Search

Objective Traditional rotation-based models of placebo nausea are limited because they do not have vehicle settings and are tied to their context. The present study introduces a new model for examining placebo-induced nausea in the laboratory that overcomes these limitations, namely, Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS). GVS stimulates the vestibular system to cause nausea through sensory mismatch with visual cues and importantly has a non-nauseating placebo setting. Using this, we tested whether conditioning could elicit placebo nausea when participants were later exposed to placebo stimulation as well as whether this placebo nausea was generalised across contexts — something that is extremely difficult to test with rotation-based models of placebo nausea. Methods Thirty healthy undergraduate students were randomised to receive either placebo GVS (controls) or active GVS during training (Context-Consistent and Context-Change). On test, all groups received placebo GVS. The controls and Context-Consistent groups were tested in the same context as training, whereas the Context-Change group was tested in a new context. Results Participants conditioned with nausea during training had significantly higher nausea symptom ratings after placebo stimulation on test than those given no conditioning. This placebo-induced nausea also generalised to a novel test context with no differences observed between the Context-Change and Context-Consistent groups. Conclusion GVS provides a new model of placebo-induced nausea that overcomes limitations to traditional rotation-based paradigms. Future studies should use this device to explore the effect of instructions and conditioning on the development of placebo nausea and to assess the efficacy of conditioning-based interventions for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the framework of further space exploration, countermeasures to combat the drawbacks of human space flights are essential. The present study focuses on the influence of microgravity on the otolith-ocular reflex and aims to test the hypothesis of artificial gravity being an adequate countermeasure for the deconditioning of the aforementioned reflex. The so-called SPIN study, commissioned by the European Space Agency, can be considered as a control experiment in the broad sense for the Neurolab mission (STS-90) during which 4 crewmembers of the space shuttle were subjected to in-flight centrifugation on the visual and vestibular investigation system (VVIS). After their nearly 16-day mission, they did not suffer from orthostatic intolerance and spatial disorientation. In addition, the relevant parameters of the otolith-ocular interaction remained unaffected. For this study cosmonauts from a long duration stay in the International Space Station that were not centrifuged in-flight were tested on the VVIS (1 g centripetal interaural acceleration) on 6 different days. Three measurements were taken about 1.5-2 months prior to launch and 3 were taken at 1, 4 and 9 days after return from space. Ocular counter-rolling was measured before, during and after rotation on the VVIS using infrared video goggles and compared pair wise using Friedman tests. The perception of verticality was monitored using an ultrasound system for perceptual evaluation. The preliminary results of 4 cosmonauts showed a surprisingly large inter-individual variability of the measurements. Although OCR and perception of verticality appeared to be influenced overall by the exposure to microgravity, the wide variability among the cosmonauts obscured any statistical significance, in particular due to one cosmonauts being inconsistent with the other 3. Despite the specificity of the tests under normal conditions, the diverse response to spaceflight of our subjects exposes the complexity of the peripheral and central neural adaptive processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bone-conducted vibration of the forehead, in the midline at the hairline (Fz) causes linear acceleration stimulation of both mastoids and results in an ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), recorded by surface electromyogram (EMG) electrodes just beneath the eyes. The early n10 component of the oVEMP is symmetrical in healthy subjects, absent in patients with bilateral vestibular loss, and in patients after unilateral vestibular loss (uVL) n10 is small or absent on the side contralateral to the uVL, but of normal amplitude on the side contralateral to the healthy ear. The n10 component probably reflects mainly otolithic function, since in the guinea pig, primary otolith irregular neurons are selectively activated by bone-conducted vibration (BCV) at low intensities (0.1 g), whereas semicircular canal primary afferents are not activated even at high intensities (10 g). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To provide the empirical basis for using ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPS) in response to Fz bone conducted vibration (BCV) stimulation to indicate vestibular function in human subjects. To show the generality of the response by testing a large number of unselected healthy subjects across a wide age range and the repeatability of the response within subjects. To provide evidence that the response depends on otolithic function. Methods: The early negative component (n10) of the oVEMP to brief BCV of the forehead, in the midline at the hairline (Fz) is recorded by surface EMG electrodes just beneath the eyes. We used a Bruel and Kjaer 4810 Mini-Shaker or a light tap with a tendon hammer to provide adequate BCV stimuli to test a large number (67) of unselected healthy people to quantify the individual differences in n10 magnitude, latency and symmetry to Fz BCV. A Radioear B-71 bone oscillator at Fz is not adequate to elicit a reliable n10 response. Results: The n10 oVEMP response showed substantial differences in amplitude between subjects, but is repeatable within subjects. n10 is of equal magnitude in both eyes with an average asymmetry around 11%. The average n10 amplitude for Mini Tone Burst BCV is 8.47μV±4.02 (sd), the average latency is 10.35ms±0.63 (sd). The amplitude of n10 decreases and its latency increases with age. Conclusions: oVEMPs are a new reliable, repeatable test to indicate vestibular and probably otolithic function. Significance: This study shows the optimum conditions for recording oVEMPs and provides baseline values for individual differences and asymmetry. oVEMPs can be measured in senior subjects without difficulty. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We recently conducted experiments where 24 seated participants were subjected (with eyes closed) to small amplitude, high-jerk impulses of linear acceleration. Responses were distributed as a continuum between two extremes. The “stiff” participants showed little movement of the head relative to the trunk, whereas the “floppy” participants showed a large head rotation in the direction opposite the sled movement. We hypothesized that the stiff behavior resulted from the spontaneous use of an imagined visual frame of reference and undertook this larger-scale study to test that idea. The distribution along the “stiff–floppy” continuum was compared with the scores on psychophysiological tests measuring vividness of imagery, visual field-dependence and motion sickness susceptibility. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the “stiffness” of individuals was loosely, but significantly related to the vividness of their imagery. However, “stiffness” was not linked to visual field-dependence or motion sickness susceptibility. Even if it explains only 20% of the variance of the data, the increase of “stiffness” with vividness of imagery fits our hypothesis. With eyes closed, stiff people may use imagined external visual cues to stabilize their head and trunk. Floppy people, who are poorer imagers, may rely more on “egocentric”, proprioceptive and vestibular inputs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

When humans are roll-tilted around the naso-occipital axis, both eyes roll or tort in the opposite direction to roll-tilt, a phenomenon known as ocular counterroll (OCR). While the magnitude of OCR is primarily determined by vestibular, somatosensory, and proprioceptive input, direction of gaze also plays a major role. The aim of this study was to measure the interaction between some of these factors in the control of OCR. Videooculography was used to measure 3D eye position during maintained whole body (en bloc) static roll-tilt in darkness, while subjects fixated first on a distant (at 130 cm) and then a near (at 30 cm) head-fixed target aligned with the subject’s midline. We found that while converging on the near target, human subjects displayed a significant reduction in OCR for both directions of roll-tilt––i.e. the interaction between OCR and vergence was not simple addition or subtraction of torsion induced by vergence with torsion induced by roll-tilt. To remove the possibility that the OCR reduction may be associated with the changed horizontal position of the eye in the orbit during symmetric convergence, we ran an experiment using asymmetric convergence in which the distant and near targets were aligned directly in front of one eye. We found the magnitude of OCR in this asymmetric convergence case was also reduced for near viewing by about the same amount as in the symmetric vergence condition, confirming that the convergence command rather than horizontal position of the eye underlies the OCR reduction, since there was no horizontal movement of the aligned eye in the orbit between fixation on the distant and near targets. Increasing vergence from 130 to 30 cm reduced OCR gain by around 35% on average. That reduction was equal in both eyes and occurred in both the symmetric and asymmetric convergence conditions. These results demonstrate the important role vergence plays in determining ocular counterroll during roll-tilt and may support the contention that vergence acts to reduce the conflict facing a stereopsis-generating mechanism. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]