Search

CD8(+) cells from healthy, asymptomatic HIV-1-infected individuals can inhibit HIV-1 replication in naturally or acutely infected CD4(+) cells in the absence of cell killing. This CD8(+) cell noncytotoxic anti-HIV response (CNAR) is mediated by a soluble CD8(+) cell antiviral factor (CAF). CNAR/CAF inhibits HIV-1 replication by blocking viral RNA transcription. HIV transcription is regulated by a variety of cis-acting DNA sequence elements within the proviral long terminal repeat (LTR). We hypothesized that one of the HIV-1 LTR proviral DNA sequence elements that binds host cell transcriptional factors is involved in this antiviral activity. To assess this possibility, we constructed full-length infectious HIV-1 molecular clones with mutations in the LTR elements NFAT, AP-1, IL-2 homology region, and the downstream ISRE. We also tested full-length infectious molecular clones that had deletions of either the NF-kappaB or Sp1 sites of the LTR or lacked functional Tat and TAR elements. Viruses generated from these molecular clones were used to acutely infect CD4(+) cells that subsequently were either co-cultured with CD8(+) cells from individuals that exhibited strong CNAR or cultured with CAF-containing fluids. The replication of all of the mutant HIV-1 viruses tested was substantially reduced in the presence of CNAR/CAF. These findings suggest that other regions in the viral LTR or other host cell processes are involved in the transcriptional block elicited by CNAR/CAF.

The rate of HIV-1 disease progression is influenced by several factors that include pathogen and host genetic variations and the quality of antiviral immune responses. The CD8+ cell non-cytotoxic antiviral response (CNAR) substantially suppresses HIV replication in CD4+ cells and is positively associated with an asymptomatic clinical state. Traditionally, the measurement of CNAR has required several culture procedures and costly reagents. Here we report the development and validation of a screening assay for detection of CNAR that accurately identifies individuals benefiting from this response. Use of the CNAR screening assay should facilitate the evaluation of this important immune parameter in studies of HIV pathogenesis, resistance to infection, and vaccine development.

Background: CD8 T cells from healthy HIV-infected individuals inhibit HIV replication in infected CD4 T cells by a non-cytotoxic mechanism mediated by a soluble CD8 cell antiviral factor, CAF. Recently, the antimicrobial peptides, alpha-defensins, were reported to constitute CAF., Objective: To examine the antiviral activity of alpha-defensins and address their potential role in CD8 cell non-cytotoxic antiviral responses., Design and Methods: A purified mixture of human neutrophil proteins (HNP) 1-3 (alpha-defensins) was used to examine the effect of alpha-defensins on HIV virions and on HIV replication in CD4 cells treated prior to or post infection. alpha-Defensin expression was analyzed at the RNA and protein level in CD8 cells as well as in various other cell types. Antibodies to the defensins were tested for their ability to inhibit CAF activity in CD8 cell culture fluids., Results: The alpha-defensins exhibited anti-HIV activity on at least two levels: directly inactivating virus particles; and affecting the ability of target CD4 cells to replicate the virus. However, while we could demonstrate alpha-defensins in neutrophils and monocytes, we found no evidence for the production of these peptides by CD8 T cells. No messenger RNA encoding these proteins was detected in purified CD8 T cells, nor did these cells produce intracellular or extracellular alpha-defensin peptides. Moreover, antibodies specific for human alpha-defensins 1, 2, and 3 did not block the antiviral activity of CAF-active CD8 cell culture fluids., Conclusions: The alpha-defensins are not produced by CD8 cells but unexpectedly were found to be expressed in monocytes. alpha-Defensins can have anti-HIV activity but are not CD8 cell antiviral factors.

Suppressive subtractive hybridization with polymerase chain reaction was used to identify the gene(s) associated with the CD8+ cell noncytotoxic anti-HIV response. The differences in gene expression profiles of CD8+ cells from a pair of discordant HIV-positive identical twins were studied. Forty-nine genes were identified as expressed at higher levels in the CD8+ cells from the infected twin that inhibited viral replication. The differential expression of these genes was then evaluated using Q-PCR to determine if this gene expression pattern is evident in CD8+ cells from other HIV-positive subjects showing this antiviral activity. Three genes, including one unknown, were found to have significantly increased expression in antiviral CD8+ cells.

In HIV infection, CD8+ cells show cytotoxic and noncytotoxic anti-HIV activity. The latter function is mediated, at least in part, by a secreted antiviral protein, the CD8+ cell antiviral factor (CAF). Because antiviral effector molecules, such as perforin and granzymes, reside in the exocytic granules of CD8+ T cells, we examined the possibility that granules contain CAF-like activity. CD8+ cells from HIV-infected individuals showing strong CAF-mediated antiviral activity were induced to release their granule constituents into culture media. Within 1 hour of stimulation, high levels of granzyme B (a primary granule constituent) were found in the culture fluids of previously activated CD8+ cells. The same culture fluids contained no or very low amounts of CAF activity, as measured with HIV-infected CD4+ cells. Maximal levels of CAF activity were not observed until 5 or 7 days after stimulation, consistent with typical CAF production kinetics. In addition, extracts of granules purified from antiviral CD8+ cells did not show any CAF activity, whereas the cytoplasmic fraction of these cells showed substantial levels of antiviral activity. These findings suggest that CAF does not reside at appreciable levels in the exocytic granules of antiviral CD8+ T cells.

CD8+ cells from healthy HIV-infected individuals can suppress HIV replication in infected CD4(+) cells without killing the cells. This CD8+ cell noncytotoxic antiviral response (CNAR), observed by coculture of CD8+ cells with infected CD4+ cells, is associated with secretion of a CD8+ cell antiviral factor (CAF). In attempts to identify CAF, we discovered that certain protease inhibitors, particularly leupeptin, can block, by up to 95%, the anti-HIV activity in CD8+ cell culture fluids as well as inhibit CNAR. The effect is dose-dependent and is observed in up to 70% of the CAF and CNAR assays by using fluids and cells from several different subjects. Pretreatment of CD8+ cells with leupeptin reduces CNAR, further supporting an inhibitory effect on a CD8+ cell product. This inhibitory activity of protease inhibitors does not affect cell growth, expression of activation antigens, or viability of either CD8+ cells or the infected CD4+ cells. The results suggest that a part of the CD8+ cell noncytotoxic response involves the activity of a protease or a protein that interacts with protease inhibitors. Proteolysis of a CD8+ cell product(s) may be involved. This observation offers a promising approach for identifying the mechanism of CNARCAF activity.

CD8(+) T cells from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals can suppress HIV replication in CD4(+) cells by a noncytotoxic mechanism that inhibits the expression of viral RNA. The present study examined whether other step(s) in the virus replicative cycle could be affected by the CD8(+) cells. Culturing HIV-infected CD4(+) T cells with antiviral CD8(+) T cells did not significantly reduce the amounts of (i) early HIV DNA reverse transcripts (detected by LTR-U3/R), (ii) total nuclear HIV gag DNA, or (iii) integrated proviral DNA. However, exposure to the CD8(+) T cells did cause a reduction in the amount of multiply spliced tat and full-length gag mRNA expressed by the infected CD4(+) T cells, confirming previous observations. The levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and interleukin-2 receptor-alpha mRNA were not affected. The results support the conclusion that the noncytotoxic anti-HIV response of CD8(+) T cells, demonstrable in vitro, does not affect any of the virus replication steps leading to the integration of proviral HIV, but specifically interrupts the expression of viral RNA.

Granzymes are a family of serine proteinases commonly found in the granules of CD8+ T cells. In HIV infection, CD8+ cells show cytotoxic and noncytotoxic antiviral activities. The latter is mediated, at least in part, by a secreted CD8+ cell antiviral factor, CAF. Because of the antiviral nature of CD8+ cells, we examined the potential anti-HIV activity of free granzymes that can be found in CD8+ cell culture fluids. Pretreatment of CD4+ T cells with granzyme A or granzyme B had no effect on their susceptibility to infection with HIV, nor did incubation of the granzymes with HIV virions alter their infectivity. Continuous culture of acutely infected CD4+ T cells with granzyme A or B showed no effect on cell viability or the replication of HIV. The findings of this study suggest that free granzymes do not control HIV infection and spread in CD4+ T cells.

Sequences of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nef gene in virus isolates from 12 long-term survivors (LTSs) and 7 progressors were compared to determine if any association existed between the sequences and the corresponding clinical status. The sequences of at least five clones were determined for each subject. Conceptual translations of the open reading frames (ORFs) were examined with respect to a consensus with a prototypic nef sequence (HIV-1SF2) and for conservation of functionally described motifs. Premature stops were observed at equivalent, yet low, frequencies among the different clinical groups: 2 of 60 (3.33%) and 1 of 45 (2.22%) respectively. No remarkable differences in protein motifs implicated in several activities ascribed to Nef were noted. An association between nef sequence characteristics and the clinical state was not found.

CD8(+) T cells from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals can suppress HIV replication in cultured CD4(+) cells by a noncytotoxic mechanism. Efficient suppression of HIV replication (>90% reduction) does not require HLA class I or class II histocompatibility between the effector CD8(+) T cells and the infected target CD4(+) T cells. However, maximal control of HIV production occurs when the CD8(+) effector cells and CD4(+) target cells are syngeneic. In some cases, more than 20-fold fewer syngeneic CD8(+) T cells were required to achieve the same degree of HIV inhibition as HLA-mismatched CD8(+) T cells. The increased antiviral activity seen in the syngeneic setting did not map exclusively to either the HLA class I or class II locus. These findings suggest that genetic compatibility (potentially, but not necessarily, at the HLA class I and class II loci) regulates CD8(+) T-cell noncytotoxic antiviral activity against infected CD4(+) T cells.

Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decrease in CD4(+) T cells and disease progression within a decade of seroconversion. However, a small group of infected people, despite being infected by HIV for 10 or more years, remain clinically asymptomatic and have stable CD4(+) cell counts without taking antiretroviral medication. To determine why these individuals, known as long-term survivors (LTS), remain healthy, the hematological profiles, viral load and properties, HIV coreceptor genotype, and anti-HIV immune responses of these people were compared with those of individuals who have progressed to disease (Progressors) over the same time period. Unlike Progressors, LTS have a low circulating viral load and a low number of HIV-infected cells. These differences in the levels of the viral load were not associated with a dominant biologic viral phenotype, varying growth kinetics of the virus, mutation in the cellular CCR5 gene, or the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Importantly, the difference in viral load could be explained by the enhanced ability of CD8(+) cells from LTS to suppress HIV replication., (Copyright 1998 by The American Society of Hematology)

The role of beta-chemokines in HIV infection was evaluated. The kinetics of regulated upon activation of normal T cell expressed and secreted, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta production by stimulated T lymphocytes did not differ substantially between HIV-infected (asymptomatic and with AIDS) and uninfected subjects. Maximal production of these beta-chemokines by activated peripheral blood cells was higher in the infected individuals than in uninfected individuals, but no significant difference was observed between healthy infected subjects and AIDS patients. Evaluation of the effect of HIV replication on beta-chemokine production indicated that acute infection of CD4+ T cells with non-syncytia-inducing (NSI) viruses generally increased beta-chemokine production two to eightfold, whereas with SI strains, it led to decreased production. The sensitivity of an individual's virus to beta-chemokine-mediated inhibition correlated with the NSI virus phenotype and a healthy clinical state. 50% of the AIDS patients, however, had NSI viruses that were sensitive to beta-chemokines. Finally, anti-beta-chemokine-neutralizing antibodies caused a more rapid release of HIV by CD4+ T cells naturally infected by NSI, but not SI, viruses indicating that endogenously produced chemokines can affect HIV production in culture. These findings suggest that beta-chemokines may affect HIV replication when an NSI virus is involved, but provide little evidence that they substantially influence HIV infection and pathogenesis.

Herpesvirus saimiri (HVS), strain 488-77, was used to derive continuously growing transformed human CD8+ T cell lines that can suppress HIV replication in CD4+ cells via the production of an antiviral factor(s). Transformed CD8+ cell lines were obtained by HVS infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells or purified CD8- T cells from HIV-infected or uninfected individuals. Suppression of primary or laboratory isolates of HIV was mediated by factor permeation of a transwell membrane or by cell-free culture supernatants. Suppressing and nonsuppressing cell lines were IL-2-dependent for good growth and showed a similar activated cell surface phenotype. The cell lines produced varying amounts of the cytokines IL-8, IL-10, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta, but not IFN-alpha. No correlation was observed between the level of any of these cytokines and the presence or absence of antiviral activity in cell line culture supernatants. These cell lines have become an important resource for studying antiviral factors produced by CD8+ T cells from HIV-infected individuals.

Lymphoid tissues from asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals, as compared with symptomatic HIV-infected subjects, show limited histopathological changes and lower levels of HIV expression. In this report we correlate the control of HIV replication in lymph nodes to the non-cytolytic anti-HIV activity of lymphoid tissue CD8+ cells. Five subjects at different stages of HIV-related disease were studied and the ability of their CD8+ cells, isolated from both lymphoid tissue and peripheral blood, to inhibit HIV replication was compared. CD8+ cells from lymphoid tissue and peripheral blood of two HIV-infected long-term survivors suppressed HIV replication at a low CD8+:CD4+ cell ratio of 0.1. The CD8+ cells from the lymphoid tissue of a third asymptomatic subject suppressed HIV replication at a CD8+:CD4+ cell ratio of 0.25; the subject's peripheral blood CD8+ cells showed this antiviral response at a lower ratio of 0.05. The lymphoid tissue CD8+ cells from two AIDS patients were not able to suppress HIV replication, and the peripheral blood CD8+ cells of only one of them suppressed HIV replication. The plasma viremia, cellular HIV load as well as the extent of pathology and virus expression in the lymphoid tissue of the two long-term survivors, were reduced compared with these parameters in the three other subjects. The data suggest that the extent of anti-HIV activity by CD8+ cells from lymphoid tissue relative to peripheral blood correlates best with the clinical state measured by lymphoid tissue pathology and HIV burden in lymphoid tissues and blood. The results add further emphasis to the importance of this cellular immune response in controlling HIV pathogenesis.

Noncytotoxic CD8+ T cells may play a critical role in preventing progression to disease following human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. This antiviral response, mediated by a novel CD8+ T-cell antiviral factor (CAF), occurs soon after infection and is maintained in asymptomatic individuals. Here, Jay Levy and colleagues propose that this antiviral activity represents a natural cellular immune reaction that controls HIV production and protects the host from potential harmful effects of cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

CD8+ cells from long-term survivors [LTS; infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) for 10 or more years and having CD4+ cell counts of > or = 500 cells per microliters] have a 3-fold greater ability to suppress HIV replication than do CD8+ cells from patients who have progressed to disease (progressors) during the same time period. A change in the pattern of cytokines produced in the host from those that typically favor cell-mediated immunity (T helper 1, TH1 or type 1) to those that down-regulate it (T helper 2, TH2 or type 2) was investigated as a cause of this reduced CD8+ cell anti-HIV function. Treatment of CD8+ cells from LTS with the TH1 cytokine interleukin (IL)-2 enhanced their anti-HIV activity, whereas exposure of these cells to TH2 cytokines IL-4 or IL-10 reduced their ability to suppress HIV replication and to produce IL-2. IL-2 could prevent and reverse the inhibitory effects of IL-4 and IL-10. Moreover, prolonged exposure of CD8+ cells from some progressors to IL-2 improved the ability of these cells to suppress HIV replication. These observations support previous findings suggesting that strong CD8+ cell responses play an important role in maintaining an asymptomatic state in HIV infection. The data suggest that the loss of CD8+ cell suppression of HIV replication associated with disease progression results from a shift in cytokine production within the infected host from a TH1 to a TH2 pattern. Modulation of these cytokines could provide benefit to HIV-infected individuals by improving their CD8+ cell anti-HIV activity.

CD8+ cells from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals suppress HIV replication in cultured CD4+ cells by a noncytolytic mechanism that involves a secreted CD8(+)-cell antiviral factor (CAF). The results of this study suggest that CD8+ cells, as well as CAF, arrest HIV replication at the level of viral transcription. Culturing naturally infected CD4+ cells actively producing HIV with autologous CD8+ cells or a 50% dilution of culture fluids from these cells results in a > 80% reduction in the number of cells expressing HIV antigens and RNA. This effect was observed within 2 days after exposure to CD8+ cells but required 6 days in the presence of CAF-containing culture fluids to reach the same extent of HIV suppression. Northern blot analysis of CD4+ cell extracts revealed that all viral RNA species (unspliced and single and double spliced) were reduced in quantity to a similar extent. CAF-containing culture fluids also had a direct inhibitory effect on HIV long terminal repeat (LTR)-driven transcription in HIV-infected 1G5 cells carrying an LTR-luciferase construct. Suppression of basal levels of LTR-driven transcription was not detected. Thus, the results suggest that the noncytolytic CD8+ cell antiviral activity observed in HIV infection exerts its effects, at least in part, by specifically interrupting HIV transcription. These findings could help in developing therapies for HIV infection.

Acute HIV infection is accompanied by a sharp rise in virus titres that soon fall, but the role of humoral and cellular immunity is not clear in the control of initial virus replication. We have found seven HIV-1 infected subjects who had CD8 T-cell non-cytolytic anti-HIV activity in plasma many months before neutralising antibodies can be detected. We observed an inverse relation between the extent of this CD8 cell response and the level of plasma viraemia in some subjects. These results suggest that a cellular immune response controls viral replication soon after HIV infection.

CD8+ T cell suppression of HIV replication in vitro was evaluated over 1-2 years in 12 HIV-infected individuals receiving daily dosages of Zidovudine (AZT) and in 9 untreated subjects. In the 12 AZT-treated patients, the level of CD8+ cell antiviral activity increased an average of 6.6-fold above pretreatment levels. These increases in antiviral activity observed were only transient in 6 of the subjects, returning to pretreatment levels, or lower, over the study period. In the other 4 subjects, the CD8+ cell antiviral response remained elevated at the end of the study period. The changes in CD8+ cell responses did not correlate with observed alterations in the absolute number or the percentage of CD4+ or CD8+ peripheral blood lymphocytes. Untreated HIV-infected subjects generally showed a gradual decrease in the CD8+ cell response over time to as much as 16-fold below baseline and in contrast to the treated group, these changes correlated with similar changes in CD4+ cell counts (P = 0.02). The average level of CD8+ cell antiviral activity observed over the entire study period was more than 2-fold above baseline in the 12 AZT-treated subjects, whereas it was more than 3-fold below baseline in the untreated subjects (P = 0.0001). Culturing CD8+ cells in the continued presence of AZT (1 microM) showed no effect on the ability of the cells to inhibit replication of an AZT-resistant HIV-1 strain. The results suggest that AZT therapy can have a beneficial effect, albeit often of limited duration, on CD8+ T cell function in HIV-infected individuals.

CD8+ cells from HIV-infected individuals inhibit HIV replication in cultured CD4+ cells by a nonlytic, non-MHC-restricted mechanism. The activity appears to be mediated in part by a soluble antiviral factor (CAF) secreted by the CD8+ cells. In an attempt to identify this factor a large panel of recombinant cytokines was examined for their effect on HIV replication in CD4+ cells. In addition to interferon-alpha and -beta, TNF alpha, TGF beta, and IL-8 reduced virus replication in a dose-dependent fashion. In some cases, the effect of the cytokine was also dependent on the HIV infection assay used to measure it. Antibodies against the inhibitory cytokines, as well as antibodies against TNF beta, IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IL-4, and IL-6 did not inactivate the antiviral effect of CAF. The data suggest that CAF does not have identity with known antiviral cytokines and therefore CAF may be a novel antiviral factor.

We have examined the relation of cell surface marker phenotype to the anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) function of CD8+ cells from individuals at various clinical stages of HIV infection. Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that the most significant changes in cell surface phenotype was found within the CD8+ cell subset expressing HLA-DR and CD28. These changes in the levels of CD28 and HLA-DR expression on CD8+ cells were found to be related to antiviral activity and have clinical relevance based on three pieces of evidence: (1) strong CD8+ cell antiviral responses were associated in infected individuals with high levels of HLA-DR+ and CD28+ subsets; (2) CD8+ cell anti-HIV activity in vitro resides predominantly in the separated CD8+ cell subsets that express HLA-DR or CD28; and (3) in longitudinal studies, CD8+ cell anti-HIV activity decreased as an individual progressed from a healthy state to an AIDS condition. Taken together, the data suggest that the CD8+ cell subset identified phenotypically as a CD8+ CD28+ HLA-DR+ cell is responsible for natural anti-HIV activity. Longitudinal studies should determine if alterations in this subset can be used as a prognostic indicator for disease progression.

The extent of antiviral activity exhibited in vitro by CD8+lymphocytes from individuals infected by HIV-1 correlates significantly with their clinical status. CD8+ lymphocytes from asymptomatic subjects were found to inhibit HIV-1 replication by 90% or greater at effector/target (E/T) ratios ranging from as low as 0.05 to 0.25. CD8+ cells from 17 of 19 (89%) of these subjects suppressed replication at an E/T ratio of 0.10 or less. CD8+ lymphocytes from symptomatic patients (non-AIDS) inhibited HIV-1 replication at E/T ratios ranging from 0.05 to 1.0, and CD8+ cells from 8 of 13 (62%) required ratios greater than 0.10. As a group, patients with AIDS exhibited the lowest degree of anti-HIV activity with their CD8+ lymphocytes. The effective range of E/T ratios from AIDS patients was 0.10-2.0, and 9 of 10 (90%) required E/T ratios greater than 0.25. This anti-HIV activity exhibited by CD8+ cells also correlated significantly with the subject's peripheral blood CD4+ cell count. The relative extent of CD8+ cell anti-HIV-1 activity was not found dependent on variations in the CD4+ target cells and viruses used. These findings suggest that the decreased CD8+ cell antiviral activity is related to progression to disease in HIV-infected individuals.

We have previously shown that immunization of C57BL/10 (H-2b) mice with the tobacco mosaic virus protein (TMVP) or with its tryptic peptide number 8, representing residues 93-112 of TMVP, induces T cells which proliferate in vitro in response to TMVP and peptide 8. In contrast, immunization of congenic B10.BR (H-2k) mice with either TMVP or with peptide 8 induces T cells which respond in vitro to the homologous but not the heterologous antigen. The capacity to exhibit cross-reactivity between TMVP and peptide 8 on the T cell level has been shown to be under major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-linked genetic control. The lack of cross-reactivity has been attributed to the inability of the H-2k APC to present the appropriate epitope to T cells. In the present paper, we report results of a comparative analysis of the role of structural aspects of the epitope on the proliferative T cell responses from TMVP and peptide 8-immune C57BL/10 (H-2b) and B10.BR (H-2k) mice. Utilizing a panel of synthetic peptides representing portions of peptide 8 and a panel of peptide-protein conjugates, we have determined that peptide 8-immune T cells of the H-2k strain appear to recognize a single epitope within peptide 8, located at its N-terminus. In contrast, in the H-2b strain, both TMVP and peptide 8-immune T cells appear to recognize two overlapping epitopes within peptide 8; one located in the middle region and the other toward the N-terminus. Experiments with H-2b T cells revealed that random amino acids added to the carboxyl or amino-terminus of nonstimulatory peptides can confer activity to these peptides, demonstrating limited specificity of interaction between antigen and Iab. Results of experiments dealing with fixation of antigen-presenting cells suggest that TMVP requires processing in order to be recognized by peptide 8-immune H-2b proliferative T cells whereas peptide 8 does not. Taken together the results suggest that the T cell responsiveness to TMVP and peptide 8 exhibited by these two congenic strains H-2b and H-2k is not only controlled by the strains MHC but is also influenced by antigen processing. Antigen processing may eliminate a potential epitope for the primary induction and the secondary stimulation of B10.BR T cells.

Work summarized herein describes two congenic strains of mice, C57BL/10 and B10.BR, which differ at the I-A region of the MHC where C57BL/10 and B10.BR are I-Ab and I-Ak respectively. Using various antigens to stimulate, in vitro, primed T lymphocytes, studies on the responsiveness of these two strains to immunization with TMVP and with its tryptic peptide number 8 representing residues 93-112 of the protein are described. These studies revealed that in the C57BL/10 strain TMVP and peptide 8 exhibit cross reactivity on the T-cell level, whereas in the B10.BR strain these two antigens do not exhibit such cross reactivity. Further studies revealed that the cross reactivity is mapped to the I-A region of the MHC with cross reactivity between TMVP and peptide 8 exhibited in mice with I-Ab (referred to as cross reactive-CR) but not with I-Ak (referred to as non cross reactive-NCR). Cell depletion and reconstitution experiments revealed that cross reactivity (or the lack thereof) could be attributed to antigen presenting cells (APC). A profound difference between the strains was also expressed on the level at which their immune T-cells reacted in vitro to stimulation by various derivatives of peptide 8. The studies suggest that the strains differ in their responsiveness to the various orientations in which the T-cell epitope(s) are presented. Assuming that TMVP, but not peptide 8, is altered during processing by APC and assuming that antigen processing by APC of CR and NCR is similar, the difference which the strains exhibit in recognizing different orientations of the epitope may account for the difference in the cross reactivity between TMVP and peptide 8 exhibited by these strains. Further investigations revealed that the strains also differ in their response to pre-immunization with TMVP prior to immunization with peptide 8. Whereas preimmunization of the C57BL/10 (CR) mice with TMVP did not affect subsequent response to immunization with peptide 8, preimmunization of B10.BR (NCR) mice with TMVP suppressed the response to subsequent immunization with peptide 8. It is suggested that the presentation of the T-cell epitope(s) in the correct orientation by the appropriate Ia is crucial for the activation of T helper cells but that such presentation does not play a decisive role in the activation of T suppressor cells.

We have previously shown that sc immunization of C57BL/10 (H-2b) mice with the tobacco mosaic virus protein (TMVP) or with its tryptic peptide number 8, representing residues 93-112 of TMVP, induces T cells which proliferate in vitro in response to TMVP and to peptide 8. In contrast, immunization of B10.BR (H-2k) mice either with TMVP or with peptide 8 induces T cells which respond in vitro to the homologous but not the heterologous Ag. In the present article , we report that in the B10.BR (H-2k) strain, ip prepriming with (TMVP) 7 days prior to sc immunization with peptide 8 causes a drastic reduction in the in vitro proliferative response of peptide 8-specific T cells while no such effect is seen in the congenic C57BL/10 (H-2b) strain. This suppression of T cell responsiveness can be transferred with TMVP-primed spleen cells. Moreover, deleting T cells from the transferred spleen cells abrogates the suppressive effect. In both H-2 haplotypes, ip prepriming with peptide 8 causes suppression of the proliferative T cell response induced by subsequent immunization with peptide 8. This prepriming has no effect on the response to TMVP immunization of B10.BR mice but does effect the response of C57BL/10 mice. Using various synthetic peptides to analyze the specificity of the suppression, we have determined that (1) T cells involved in the suppression of the proliferative T cell response to a single peptide determinant do not suppress the proliferative T cell response to other determinants on the protein antigen and (2) these T cells with suppressor function, and proliferating T cells which are ultimately regulated, can exhibit specificity for the same epitope. These studies suggest that there may exist fundamental differences as to how T cells which participate in suppression an proliferating T cells (which include mainly T helper cells) recognize protein antigens.

The protein Ag, tobacco mosaic virus protein, (TMVP) and its tryptic peptide number 8 (residues 93-112 of the protein) exhibit cross-reactivity on the T cell level in some strains of mice (e.g., C3H.SW, C57BL/10); these strains are termed cross-reactive (CR). In other strains such as A/J or B10.BR, no cross-reactivity is exhibited; these strains are termed non-cross-reactive (NCR). Genetic experiments indicated that the cross-reactivity is dominant and that it is mapped to the I-A or I-E region of the MHC, with cross-reactivity exhibited by the I-Ab haplotype but not by I-Ak or I-Ek. Cell reconstitution experiments have indicated that the non-cross-reactivity is associated with the inability of the NCR APC to present Ag. Analysis of the area(s) on peptide 8 which serve(s) as epitope revealed that both strains recognize an overlapping area consisting of 11 amino acid residues in the middle of peptide 8 (residues 97-107), which by itself is nonstimulatory to TMVP- or peptide 8-immune T cells of the CR or the NCR strains. However, the addition of a few amino acid residues of the sequence of peptide 8 to this area converts it to a complete stimulatory epitope. Additivity experiments revealed that the CR strain contains two major T cell populations each recognizing this middle region of peptide 8 when elongated by a few amino acids N-terminally and C-terminally, respectively. In contrast, the NCR strain contains one major T cell population recognizing elongation only N-terminally. Because TMVP (but not peptide 8) requires processing before presentation to T cells, it is postulated that, during processing of TMVP, there occur alterations in the area of the proximal three or four N-terminal amino acids of the region consisting of peptide 8, destroying the only region containing the T cell epitope recognized by the NCR strain, hence TMVP and peptide 8 do not exhibit cross-reactivity in this strain. The same alterations of TMVP still leave intact an epitope consisting of amino acid residues C-terminal to the altered area which is recognized by the CR strain, hence the cross-reactivity exhibited by this strain. The results suggest that the difference in cross-reactivity on the T cell level between TMVP and peptide 8 exhibited by the strains may be due to differences in the orientation of presentation and the subsequent cell recognition of an epitope contained within peptide 8.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)