Search

IntroductionTo enhance health and prevent secondary consequences for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), maintenance of an active lifestyle following participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is important. However, levels of physical activity often decrease after completion of a structured CR programme. Models that support long-term behaviour change with a sustained level of physical activity are imperative. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a mobile health intervention based on the Health Action Process Approach theoretical model of behaviour change in patients with CVD for 3 months after completion of a CR programme.Methods and analysisIn a feasibility trial design, we will recruit 40 participants from CR programmes at Slagelse Hospital, the City of Slagelse (municipality), or Holbæk Hospital. After completing the standard structured CR programme, each participant will create an action plan for physical activity together with a physiotherapist. Following that, participants are sent 2 weekly text messages for 3 months. The first text message prompts physical activity, and the second will check if the action plan has been followed. If requested by participants, a coordinator will call and guide the physical activities behaviour. The feasibility of this maintenance intervention is evaluated based on predefined progression criteria. Physical activity is measured with accelerometers at baseline and at 3 months follow-up.Ethics and disseminationStudy approval was waived (EMN-2021-00020) by the Research Ethics Committee of Region Zealand, Denmark. Study results will be made public and findings disseminated to patients, health professionals, decision-makers, researchers and the public.Trial registration numberNCT05011994.

People with multimorbidity (two or more medical conditions) have poorer physical and psychosocial health and higher risk of hospital admission and premature death.1 The complexity and increased burden of multimorbidity presents challenges for healthcare systems.2 Therefore, the current standard of care for patients with multimorbidity includes visiting many healthcare professionals and reviewing different pharmacological treatments with inherent risk of side effects. This is often unsatisfactory for the patients.3 Exercise is considered a core treatment for at least 26 chronic conditions. However, little is known about its effects in people with multimorbidity. To fill this gap, we performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials to investigate the benefits and harms of exercise therapy (ie, a regimen or plan of physical activities designed and prescribed …

Background To investigate the effect of behavioural interventions targeting lifestyle behaviours on physical activity, weight loss, physical function, health-related quality of life and depression in people with multimorbidity and to investigate which Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) are associated with better outcomes.Methods Systematic review of randomised controlled trials targeting lifestyle behaviours in people with multimorbidity following the Cochrane recommendations. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL up to June 19th, 2020 and screening reference list of Cochrane reviews including people with multimorbidity, ongoing systematic reviews of the MOBILIZE project, the WHO registry and citation tracking of included studies. Meta-analyses using random-effects model to assess the effect of behavioural interventions on physical activity, weight loss, physical function and health-related quality of life and depression. Meta-regression analyses and effectiveness ratios to investigate the impact of pre-specified mediators of effect estimates. Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias Tool’ 2.0 and the GRADE assessment to evaluate the overall quality of evidence.Results Fourteen papers involving 1,378 people. Behavioural interventions had little to no effect on physical activity (standardised mean difference 0.38, 95%CI -0.12 to 0.61 – very low certainty) and the effect on weight loss is uncertain (BMI mean difference -0.17, 95%CI -1.17 to 0.83 – very low certainty) at the end-treatment follow-up (mean duration 23 weeks, SD 15). Small improvements were seen in health-related quality of life (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.42 – moderate certainty) and physical function (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.73 – low certainty), and moderate improvements were seen for depression symptoms (SMD -0.70, 95%CI -0.98 to -0.42 – moderate certainty). Studies using the BCTs ‘action planning’ and ‘social support (practical)’ reported greater physical activity and weight loss. The effects of behavioural interventions diminished for all the outcomes at long-term follow-ups (mean duration of 36 weeks, SD 15).Conclusions Behavioural interventions targeting lifestyle behaviours improve health-related quality of life and physical function, and reduce depression symptoms, whereas little to no effect was achieved on physical activity and weight loss in people with multimorbidity. However, the evidence for physical activity and weight loss were of low quality and the end-treatment benefits diminished over time.Systematic review protocol Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r7pm5/

Background: Persistent pain represents a significant burden for individuals and society, exerting a profound effect on quality of life and posing a significant strain on healthcare resources. Novel interventions are needed to reduce the impact of psychological comorbidities on people who live with pain but also to improve pain self-management. Objectives: The aim of this research was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a brief group-based ACT intervention designed to osteopathy for people who live with persistent pain and psychological comorbidities. Methods: A mixed-method approach has been utilized that comprised of qualitative interviews providing an insight into peoples’ experiences of participating and quantitative data including psychological flexibility, depression, anxiety, fear avoidance and general health status. This preliminary report will only present the qualitative findings. Results: A total of 9 participants took part in the intervention. The participants engaged well with the exercises and with the ACT model in general. Program attendance was high (4 out of the 9 participants attended all the 6 sessions, (further attendance is shown in the Supplementary file 7); all 9 took part in the post-intervention interview). Three major themes were identified from the interview data: Engaging with the ACT model, Experiences of taking part in the intervention and Perceived changes. The participants reported positive experiences: they found being able to connect with people who experience similar issues valuable and expressed that they liked the content and structure of the program. The intervention appeared to be feasible with the support of the osteopaths. Conclusion: Delivering a brief ACT-based intervention for people living with persistent pain was found to be feasible and acceptable. The collaboration between osteopaths and psychologists in supporting people who live with persistent pain demonstrates potential and should be further explored in the future.

We found two typesetting errors in the paper. The errors are insignificant and do not influence the results or interpretation of the study. The inclusion criteria for studies including people with hypertension (paragraph 2.2.1. Study design and participants) are “systolic blood pressure ≥140 and diastolic blood pressure ≥90” and not (systolic blood pressure >90 and diastolic blood pressure >140). The paragraph 3.2. Participants contains a sentence repeated twice consecutively, that is "The most common conditions reported in the 23 RCTs (3363 people). The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

AimTo quantify recruitment, retention and differential retention rates and associated trial, participant and intervention characteristics in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL from 1990 to April 20, 2020.Study selectionRCTs including people with multimorbidity comparing exercise therapy with a non-exposed comparator group reporting at least one of the following outcomes: physical function, health-related quality of life, depression symptoms, or anxiety symptoms.Data extraction and synthesisRecruitment rates (proportion of people randomised/proportion of people eligible), retention rates (proportion of people providing the outcomes of interest/proportion randomised) and differential retention rates (difference in proportion of people providing the outcomes in the intervention group and comparator group) were calculated. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled proportions. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane ´Risk of Bias tool 2.0´ for individual studies, and the GRADE approach was used to assess the overall quality of the evidence.ResultsTwenty-three RCTs with 3363 people were included. The pooled prevalence for recruitment rate was 75% (95%CI 66 to 84%). The pooled prevalence for retention rate was 90% (95%CI 86 to 94%) at the end of the intervention (12 weeks; interquartile range (IQR) (12 to 12)). Meta-regression analyses showed that increasing age and including a higher proportion of people with hypertension was associated with lower retention rates. Retention rates did not differ between the intervention and comparator groups. The overall quality of the evidence was deemed very low.ConclusionThree in four eligible people with multimorbidity were randomised to RCTs using exercise therapy, of which nine out of 10 provided end of treatment outcomes with no difference seen between the intervention and comparison groups. However, the results must be interpreted with caution due to large differences between the included studies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govCRD42020161329. Registered on 28 April 2020.

Objectives To investigate the benefits and harms of exercise therapy on physical and psychosocial health in people with multimorbidity. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL from 1990 to April 20th, 2020 and Cochrane reviews on the effect of exercise therapy for each of the aforementioned conditions, reference lists of the included studies, the WHO registry and citation tracking on included studies in Web of Science. Eligibility criteria for study selection RCTs investigating the benefit of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity, defined as two or more of the following conditions: osteoarthritis (of the knee or hip), hypertension, type 2 diabetes, depression, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on at least one of the following outcomes: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), physical function, depression or anxiety. Summary and quality of the evidence Meta-analyses using a random-effects model to assess the benefit of exercise therapy and the risk of non-serious and serious adverse events according to the Food and Drug Administration definition. Meta-regression analyses to investigate the impact of pre-specified mediators of effect estimates. Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias Tool’ 2.0 and the GRADE assessment to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. Results Twenty-three RCTs with 3363 people, testing an exercise therapy intervention (mean duration 13.0 weeks, SD 4.0) showed that exercise therapy improved HRQoL (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.61) and objectively measured physical function (SMD 0.33, 95 % CI 0.17 to 0.49), and reduced depression symptoms (SMD -0.80, 95 % CI -1.21 to -0.40) and anxiety symptoms (SMD -0.49, 95 % CI -0.99 to 0.01). Exercise therapy was not associated with an increased risk of non-serious adverse events (risk ratio 0.96, 95 % CI 0.53–1.76). By contrast, exercise therapy was associated with a reduced risk of serious adverse events (risk ratio 0.62, 95 % CI 0.49 to 0.78). Meta-regression showed that increasing age was associated with lower effect sizes for HRQoL and greater baseline depression severity was associated with greater reduction of depression symptoms. The overall quality of evidence for all the outcomes was downgraded to low, mainly due to risk of bias, inconsistency and indirectness. Conclusions Exercise therapy appears to be safe and to have a beneficial effect on physical and psychosocial health in people with multimorbidity. Although the evidence supporting this was of low quality, it highlights the potential of exercise therapy in the management and care of this population.

BackgroundTo our knowledge, there is no intervention which includes personalised exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity, although these interventions may be as effective as for people with single chronic conditions. Therefore, we developed a novel intervention, including personalised exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity.MethodsWe followed the Medical Research Council framework and conducted one scoping review, five systematic reviews, two registry-based studies, one qualitative interview study and a mixed-methods feasibility study. Following an iterative approach, together with feedback from people with multimorbidity and relevant stakeholders, we developed the MOBILIZE intervention.ResultsThe intervention included 24 (60 minutes) sessions of personalised exercise therapy and 24 (30 minutes) sessions of self-management support twice a week for 12 weeks, delivered in small groups by specifically trained physiotherapists. The intervention targets physiological, psychosocial, behavioural, and contextual factors to improve health-related quality of life and physical function in people living with multimorbidity.ConclusionsWe developed a personalised exercise therapy and self-management support programme for people with multimorbidity. The intervention will be tested for its safety and effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial.

Background Exercise therapy is safe and effective in people with single conditions, but the feasibility in people with two or more conditions is unclear. Therefore, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of exercise therapy and self-management in people with multimorbidity prior to a randomised, controlled trial (RCT). Methods This was a mixed-methods feasibility study performed in two general hospitals and one psychiatric hospital. 20 adult patients (8 females; mean age (SD) 67 (6.9)) with at least two long-term conditions and a score of ≥ 3 on Disease Burden Impact Scale for at least one condition (at least moderate limitations of daily activities) and of ≥ 2 for at least one other condition. Patients with unstable health conditions, at risk of serious adverse events (SAE) or with terminal conditions were excluded. Participants received 12 weeks of exercise (18 60-min group-based and 6 home-based sessions) and self-management support (6 90-min group-based sessions) supervised by physiotherapists. Pre-defined progression to RCT criteria were the primary outcomes and included recruitment rate (acceptable 20 participants in 3 months), retention through follow-up (75% retention), compliance (75% complete > 9 of exercise and > 3 self-management sessions), outcome burden (80% do not find outcomes too burdensome), improvement in quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and function (6-min walk test; ≥ 50% experience clinically relevant improvements) and intervention-related SAEs (No SAEs). Furthermore, a purposeful sample including eleven participants and two facilitators were interviewed about their experiences of participating/facilitating. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results Recruitment rate (20 in 49 days), retention (85%), outcome burden (95%), and SAEs (0 related to intervention) were acceptable, while compliance (70%) and improvements (35% in quality of life, 46% in function) were not (amendment needed before proceeding to RCT). The intervention was found acceptable by both participants and physiotherapists with some barriers among participants relating to managing multiple chronic conditions while caring for others or maintaining a job. Physiotherapists expressed a need for additional training. Conclusions Exercise therapy and self-management are feasible in people with multimorbidity. The subsequent RCT, amending the intervention according to progression criteria and feedback, will determine whether the intervention is superior to usual care alone. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04645732 Open Science Framework https://osf.io/qk6yg/

Ageing populations and the increase in long-term conditions have contributed to a rise in the number of people living with multimorbidity (defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions in the same individual), who often experience difficulties related to polypharmacy, treatment burden, competing priorities and poor coordination of care. Self-management education programs are increasingly included as an essential component of interventions to improve outcomes in this population. However, understanding how interventions support self-management in patients with multimorbidity is paramount. Recent developments in the design of health behaviour interventions have highlighted the importance of classifying intervention components (behaviour change techniques (BCT) and mapping these intervention components on to mechanisms of change.This scoping review will focus on mapping the literature and identifying BCTs used in interventions that primarily target health behaviours and include educational or self- management elements in relation to people living with multimorbidity.The scoping review process will be guided by the framework for conducting scoping reviews developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (Peters et al., 2015). We will search electronic databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, clinical registries and grey literature for RCTs of interventions targeting health-related behaviours in people with multimorbidity published between 1990-2019. Patient-centred interventions that include patient education and/or self-management will be included. Two researchers will screen the studies retrieved by the search and code the BCTs present in the studies selected.The interventions will be clustered by type, target behaviour/s and combinations of chronic conditions they address. A breakdown of the frequency and specific combinations of BCTs used across trials and for each targeted behaviour will be presented. A narrative synthesis will highlight important aspects of the studies included. We anticipate that the results will be available in February 2020.The findings of this scoping review will help inform the development of a novel intervention for people with multimorbidity.

Background To investigate the effect of in-person delivered behavioural interventions in people with multimorbidity and which behaviour change techniques (BCTs), targeting lifestyle behaviours, are associated with better outcomes. Methods Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL and screened reference list of reviews including people with multimorbidity, registries, and citation tracking of included studies. Meta-analyses using random-effects model to assess the effect of behavioural interventions and meta-regression analyses and effectiveness ratios to investigate the impact of mediators on effect estimates. Cochrane ‘Risk of Bias Tool’ 2.0 and the GRADE assessment to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. Results Fourteen studies involving 1,378 people. Behavioural interventions had little to no effect on physical activity (standardised mean difference 0.38, 95% CI −0.12–0.87) and the effect on weight loss was uncertain (BMI mean difference −0.17, 95% CI −1.1–0.83) at the end-treatment follow-up. Small improvements were seen in health-related quality of life (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.42) and physical function (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.12–0.73), and moderate improvements were seen for depression symptoms (SMD −0.70, 95% CI −0.97–0.42). Studies using the BCTs ‘action planning’ and ‘social support (practical)’ reported greater physical activity and weight loss. Conclusions Behavioural interventions targeting lifestyle behaviours may improve health-related quality of life and physical function, and reduce depression, whereas little to no effect was achieved on physical activity and weight loss in people with multimorbidity. However, the evidence for physical activity and weight loss were of low quality and the end-treatment benefits diminished over time.

Background Behavior change and exercise are considered critical for successful self-management in people with multimorbidity, however, little is known about people’s needs, experiences, and preferences. Purpose The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the perspectives of people living with multimorbidity, healthcare professionals, relatives, and patient advocates in relation to self-management and exercise behavior. Research design Analysis was carried out by means of a hybrid inductive-deductive approach using Framework Analysis that enabled the subsequent use of the COM-B model in relation to the study of exercise behavior specifically. Study sample We conducted 17 interviews (9 focus groups; 8 key informants) with 48 informants from four groups (22 people living with multimorbidity, 17 healthcare professionals, 5 relatives, and 5 patient advocates). Data analysis Through an inductive Framework analysis, we constructed three themes: Patient education, supporting behavior change, and lack of a “burning platform.” Subsequent deductive application of the COM-B profile (applied solely to data related to exercise behavior) unveiled a variety of barriers to exercise and self-management support (pain, fatigue, breathlessness, lack of motivation, financial issues, accessibility, decreased social support). Results Overall, the four groups shared common understandings while also expressing unique challenges. Conclusions Future interventions and/or policies targeting exercise behavior in people living with multimorbidity should address some of the barriers identified in this study.