Search

Although several different contouring instructional programs are available to radiation oncologists and trainees, very little is known about which methods and resources benefit learners most, and whether some learners may need alternate forms of instruction. This study aimed to determine the factors that were predictors of learners' success in anatomy, radiology, and contouring education.Participants in the online and face-to-face Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp completed pre- and postintervention evaluations that assessed anatomy/radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and spatial ability. Baseline factors were assessed as predictors of outcomes across multiple educational domains.One hundred and eighty (face-to-face: n = 40; online: n = 140) participants enrolled in the ARC Bootcamp, and 57 (face-to-face: n = 30; online: n = 27) participants completed both evaluations. Of the participants enrolled, 37% were female, and most were radiation oncology residents (62%). In the anatomy/radiology knowledge testing, all quartiles (based on baseline performance) improved numerically; however, the largest improvements occurred in learners with the lowest baseline scores (P.001). At the end of the Bootcamp, learners with lower-performing scores did not reach the level of learners with the highest baseline scores (Bonferroni-corrected P.001). Regarding the contouring assessment, improvements were only evident for the participants with lower-performing baseline scores (P.05). Spatial anatomy skills, as measured by the spatial anatomy task, were correlated to contouring ability. Overall, the greatest improvements were seen for learners in postgraduate year 1 to 3, those with no previous rotation experience in a given discipline, and those who attended from other programs (ie, medical physics residents and medical students).The ARC Bootcamp improved all levels of performers' anatomy and radiology knowledge but only lower-performers' contouring ability. The course alone does not help lower-performing learners reach the abilities of higher-performers. The ARC Bootcamp tends to be most beneficial for participants with less radiation oncology experience. Curriculum modifications can be made to help support ARC Bootcamp participants with lower performing scores.

The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) intervention providing integrated education for radiation oncology (RO) residents and medical physicists. To increase access, we launched an online offering in 2019. We evaluated the effect of the online course on participants' knowledge acquisition, contouring skills, and self-confidence by comparing it with the F2F course.Using modules, the online course offers content similar to that of the F2F comparator. Participants from the 2019 F2F and the 2019-2020 online course completed pre- and postevaluations assessing anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and course satisfaction.There were 180 individuals enrolled (F2F: n = 40; online: n = 140); 57 participants (F2F: n = 30; online: n = 27) completed both evaluations. The online course had a wider geographic participation (19 countries) than F2F (4 countries). F2F had primarily RO resident participation (80%), compared with online (41%). Both cohorts demonstrated similar improvements in self-confidence pertaining to anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, and interpreting radiology images (all P.001). Both the online (mean ± SD improvement: 6.6 ± 6.7 on a 40-point scale; P.001) and F2F (3.7 ± 5.7; P = .002) groups showed anatomy and radiology knowledge improvement. Only the F2F group demonstrated improvement with the contouring assessment (F2F: 0.10 ± 0.17 on a 1-point Dice scale; P = .004; online: 0.07 ± 0.16; P = .076). Both cohorts perceived the course as a positive experience (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4 on a 5-point scale; online: 4.5 ± 0.6), stated it would improve their professional practice (F2F: 4.6 ± 0.5; online: 4.2 ± 0.8), and said they would recommend it to others (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4; online: 4.4 ± 0.6).The online ARC Bootcamp demonstrated improved self-confidence, knowledge scores, and high satisfaction levels among participants. The offering had lower completion rates but was more accessible to geographic regions, provided a flexible learning experience, and allowed for ongoing education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Basic sciences are a cornerstone of undergraduate medical education (UME) as they provide a necessary foundation for the clinical sciences to be built upon and help foster trainees’ competency. However, research indicates that students’ basic science knowledge is not well retained, and as a result, students are ill-prepared, with respect to their basic science knowledge, when entering clerkship. One potential reason why students may not be prepared for clerkship is a lack of understanding as to which basic science concepts are critical for medical students to retain from pre-clerkship. We facilitated interviews with all core UME clerkship directors to establish which basic science concepts they expect students to know prior to each clerkship rotation, along with student’s basic science strengths and areas of improvement. Interviews revealed that students are expected to have some knowledge of every basic science prior to clerkship, with pharmacology being a strong focus, as many specialties deal with common drugs and classes of drugs. Additionally, general anatomy and physiology knowledge were deemed student strengths in two rotations. Clerkship directors focused on perceived areas of improvement more than perceived strengths, with the most prevalent areas being pharmacology, microbiology, and detailed anatomy. These results represent views of clerkship directors from one Canadian institution; however, since clerks rotate through institutions across Canada, this data provides the impetus for creating a national discussion to help foster standardization of UME curricula, with the overarching goal of ensuring all graduates are proficient in the necessary fundamentals as they transition into residency.

Background As new treatments and technologies have been introduced in radiation oncology, the clinical roles of radiation therapists (RTs) have expanded. However, there are few formal learning opportunities for RTs. An online, anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp (ARC Bootcamp) originally designed for medical residents was identified as a prospective educational tool for RTs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an RT edition of the ARC Bootcamp on knowledge, contouring, and confidence, as well as to identify areas for future modification. Methods Fifty licensed RTs were enrolled in an eight-week, multidisciplinary, online RT ARC Bootcamp. Contouring practice was available throughout the course using an online contouring platform. Outcomes were evaluated using a pre-course and post-course multiple-choice quiz (MCQ), contouring evaluation and qualitative self-efficacy and satisfaction survey. Results Of the fifty enrolled RTs, 30 completed the course, and 26 completed at least one of the post-tests. Nineteen contouring dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were available for paired pre- and post-course analysis. RTs demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mean DSC scoring pooled across all contouring structures (mean ± SD improvement: 0.09 ± 0.18 on a scale from 0 to 1, p=0.020). For individual contouring structures, 3/15 reached significance in contouring improvement. MCQ scores were available for 26 participants and increased after RT ARC Bootcamp participation with a mean ± SD pre-test score of 18.6 ± 4.2 (46.5%); on a 40-point scale vs. post-test score of 24.5 ± 4.3 (61.4%) (p < 0.001). RT confidence in contouring, anatomy knowledge and radiographic identification improved after course completion (p < 0.001). Feedback from RTs recommended more contouring instruction, less in-depth anatomy review and more time to complete the course. Conclusions The RT ARC Bootcamp was an effective tool for improving anatomy and radiographic knowledge among RTs. The course demonstrated improvements in contouring and overall confidence. However, only approximately half of the enrolled RTs completed the course, limiting statistical power. Future modifications will aim to increase relevance to RTs and improve completion rates.

BACKGROUND The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) course designed to ensure radiation oncology residents were equipped with the knowledge and skillset to use radiation therapy techniques properly. The ARC Bootcamp was proven to be a useful educational intervention for improving learners’ knowledge of anatomy and radiology and contouring ability. An online version of the course was created to increase accessibility to the ARC Bootcamp and provide a flexible, self-paced learning environment. This study aimed to describe the instructional design model used to create the online offering and report participants’ motivation to enroll in the course and the online ARC Bootcamp's strengths and improvement areas. METHODS The creation of the online course followed the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) framework. The course was structured in a linear progression of locked modules consisting of radiology and contouring lectures, anatomy labs, and integrated evaluations. RESULTS The online course launched on the platform Teachable in November 2019, and by January 2021, 140 participants had enrolled in the course, with 27 participants completing all course components. The course had broad geographic participation with learners from 19 different countries. Of the participants enrolled, 34% were female, and most were radiation oncology residents (56%), followed by other programs (24%), such as medical physics residents or medical students. The primary motivator for participants to enroll was to improve their subject knowledge/skill (44%). The most common strength identified by participants was the course's quality (41%), and the most common improvement area was to incorporate more course content (41%). CONCLUSIONS The creation of the online ARC Bootcamp using the ADDIE framework was feasible. The course is accessible to diverse geographic regions and programs and provides a flexible learning environment; however, the course completion rate was low. Participants’ feedback regarding their experiences will inform future offerings of the online course.

Basic sciences are a cornerstone of undergraduate medical education (UME), yet research indicates that students’ basic science knowledge is not well retained. Many UME curricula are increasing the integration between the basic and clinical sciences with the goal of enhancing students’ knowledge levels; however, the impact of clerkship training on students’ basic science knowledge remains inconclusive. Thus, using clerkship directors’ expectations as framework, we aimed to assess third-year medical students’ basic science knowledge during clerkship training and evaluate the influence of clerkship training on their basic science knowledge. Using concepts deemed necessary by clerkship directors, we created a basic science assessment for each clerkship rotation. Assessments were distributed to third-year medical students as a pre- and post-test to assess their basic science knowledge prior to and at the completion of each rotation. On average, students retained ≥ 60% of relevant basic science knowledge from pre-clerkship, and neither clerkship rotation order, nor the basic science discipline being assessed, impacted students’ basic science knowledge levels. Post-test data revealed that students, on average, reinforced fundamental concepts during clerkship. Interestingly, even though lower-performing students demonstrated the greatest post-test improvement, they still left each rotation with knowledge deficits compared with their highest-performing peers, suggesting that the clinical experience of clerkship appears to be particularly beneficial for lower-performing students, in regard to enhancing their basic science knowledge. Overall, results indicate that earlier exposure to clinical learning in UME, along with integration of basic science education into clerkship, could promote students’ basic science knowledge acquisition and retention.

Background: The ligamentum mucosum is composed of dense regular connective tissue and traverses from the distal femur to the infrapatellar fat pad. While the gross and histologic morphology has been studied, there is currently no evidence concerning the biomechanical properties of the ligamentum mucosum and the potential of anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical, mechanical and histological properties of the ligamentum mucosum. Methods: Dissections were performed on cadaveric knee specimens (N = 18) and histological analysis (n = 6) was performed to define the anatomical characteristics of the ligamentum mucosum using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, and immunohistochemical methods. Biomechanical testing (n = 5) was conducted to determine the tensile properties of the ligamentum mucosum. The peak load at failure, stiffness, and strain were analyzed. Results: Sixty-four percent of the knees had a ligamentum mucosum and the histological analysis confirmed it to be composed of dense regular connective tissue. Small peripheral nerves were identified in the junction between the ligamentum mucosum and the fat pad. The average (SD) peak force of failure, stiffness, and strain were 31.9 N (19.0), 5.1 N/mm (3.59), and 0.83 (0.14), respectively. Conclusions: The tensile strength and stiffness of the ligamentum mucosum is considerably less than the primary stabilizers of the knee joint. Based on these findings, it is improbable that the ligamentum mucosum has a meaningful effect on the kinematics of the extensor mechanism; perturbations of the tissue and the connected infrapatellar fat pad could potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of anterior knee pain. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Purpose: Simulation-based medical education is an effective tool for medical teaching, but simulation-based medical education deployment in radiation oncology (RO) is limited. Flexible nasopharyngoscopy (FNP), an essential skill for RO residents, requires practice that typically occurs on volunteer patients, introducing the potential for stress and discomfort. We sought to develop a high-fidelity simulator and intervention that provides RO residents the opportunity to develop FNP skills in a low-pressure environment. Methods and Materials: Computed tomography images were used to create an anatomically accurate 3-dimensional–printed model of the head and neck region. An intervention incorporating didactic instruction, multimedia content, and FNP practice on the model was designed and administered to RO residents attending the Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp. Participants completed pre- and postintervention evaluations of the training session and model fidelity, and self-assessments of FNP skill and confidence performing FNP. Participants were video recorded performing FNP pre- and postintervention. Videos were scored by a blinded observer on a predefined rubric. Changes in scores were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Twenty-four participants from 17 institutions and 4 countries completed the intervention, 50% were women, and most were senior residents. Postintervention, FNP confidence and FNP performance improved significantly (mean ± standard deviation on a 10-point scale: 1.8 ± 1.8, P < .001; 2.2 ± 2.0, P < .001, respectively). Participants felt the model was helpful (mean ± standard deviation on a 5-point scale: 4.2 ± 0.6), anatomically correct (4.1 ± 0.9), and aided in spatial comprehension (4.3 ± 0.8). Overall satisfaction for the intervention was high (4.3 ± 0.8). Participants strongly agreed the intervention should be integrated into RO training programs (4.3 ± 0.8). Conclusions: A 3-dimensional–printed model and associated intervention were effective at improving FNP performance and the teaching method was rated highly by participants. RO residents may benefit from broader dissemination of this technique to improve trainee performance.

© 2017, European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA). Purpose: The purpose of the current investigation was to characterize biomechanical differences between the supra- and infra-meniscal sections of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). We hypothesized that the supra-meniscal fibers of the ALL would be stronger and stiffer than the infra-meniscal fiber. Methods: Nine cadaveric knee specimens [mean (SD) age = 79 (14.6) years] were dissected to identify the borders of the ALL while maintaining the anatomy of the lateral meniscus. The specimens were randomly assigned to either a supra-meniscal (the ALL below the meniscus was sectioned leaving only the supra-meniscal ALL intact) or an infra-meniscal (the ALL above the meniscus was sectioned leaving only the infra-meniscal attachment intact) group. The specimens were potted into dental cement such that the ALL was pulling laterally on the meniscus when the specimens were secured within an Instron materials testing machine. The specimens were subjected to a tensile failure test at 1 mm/s. The load at failure and stiffness were calculated from the force–displacement curves, while peak stress was calculated by normalizing the peak force to the cross-sectional area of the ALL. Furthermore, one intact knee specimen was used to perform a histological analysis on the two ALL sections using Masson’s Trichome staining. Results: The infra-meniscal ALL had a significantly (p = 0.03) higher load to failure (195.0 vs. 132.1 N) and was significantly (p = 0.03) stiffer than the supra-meniscal fibers (24.8 vs. 12.3 N/mm). The relatively similar cross-section areas also resulted in the infra-meniscal sections having a greater peak stress (p = 0.04) (11.1 vs. 5.4 MPa). Histological analysis showed relatively consistent fiber orientation with similar organization noted throughout the fibers. Conclusions: The ALL-meniscal construct that includes the infra-meniscal fibers was significantly stronger and stiffer than the construct that includes the supra-meniscal fibers. The infra-meniscal ALL is another important component of the anterolateral complex of the knee, and should be considered when presented with an ACL and/or meniscal injury.