Search

Matthew Harlin,1,&ast; Craig Chepke,2,3,&ast; Frank Larsen,4,&ast; Karimah S Bell Lynum,5,&ast; Sanjeda R Chumki,5,&ast; Heather Fitzgerald,6,&ast; Pedro Such,7,&ast; Jessica Madera-McDonough,8,&ast; Murat Yildirim,7,&ast; Moeen Panni,8,&ast; Stephen R Saklad9,&ast; 1Quantitative Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Early Phase & Translational Medicine, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA; 2Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3Excel Psychiatric Associates, Huntersville, NC, USA; 4Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modelling & Simulation, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark; 5US Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA; 6Medical Affairs, Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA; 7Medical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark; 8Global Medical Affairs, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA; 9Division of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, San Antonio, TX, USA&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Matthew Harlin, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., 508 Carnegie Center Dr, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA, Tel +1-240-683-3055, Email Matthew.Harlin@otsuka-us.comAbstract: Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a novel long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of aripiprazole monohydrate for administration once every 2 months, developed for the treatment of schizophrenia or maintenance monotherapy treatment of bipolar I disorder in adults (indication will vary by country). Aripiprazole lauroxil 1064 mg (AL 1064) is an LAI formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil, an aripiprazole prodrug, for administration once every 2 months, indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. This analysis provides an indirect comparison of aripiprazole plasma concentrations following multiple doses of either formulation. Clinical trial data were used to determine average steady-state aripiprazole plasma concentration (Cavg,ss), maximum aripiprazole plasma concentration (Cmax), and other pharmacokinetic parameters of either formulation following four administrations (96 patients received Ari 2MRTU 960; 28 patients received AL 1064). All pharmacokinetic parameters were considered in the context of a minimum aripiprazole therapeutic concentration (Cmin) of ≥ 95 ng/mL. An exposure–response analysis using data from two Phase III trials of aripiprazole once-monthly (an aripiprazole monohydrate LAI, administered monthly), showed that patients with a Cmin ≥ 95 ng/mL are 4.41 times less likely to relapse than patients with a Cmin < 95 ng/mL. A similar analysis has not been performed for AL 1064. However, consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring recommend a range of 100– 350 ng/mL for aripiprazole. Following four administrations, mean (standard deviation [SD]) Cavg,ss over the 2-month dosing interval was 263 (133) ng/mL for Ari 2MRTU 960 and 140.7 (57.3) ng/mL for AL 1064. Mean (SD) Cmax during the fourth dosing interval was 342 (157) ng/mL for Ari 2MRTU 960 and 188.8 (79.8) ng/mL for AL 1064. This indirect comparison showed that, following four administrations, Ari 2MRTU 960 and AL 1064 delivered mean aripiprazole plasma concentrations that remained above the minimum therapeutic concentration of aripiprazole over the 2-month dosing interval.Keywords: antipsychotic, bipolar I disorder, long-acting injectable, schizophrenia

The purpose of this summary is to explain key findings from a study that included people with schizophrenia, as described in two separate articles (see the 'Further Information' section for more details). The study compared a new formulation of aripiprazole, given as an injection once every 2 months, with a once‑monthly injection of aripiprazole., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

The purpose of this summary is to explain key findings from a study that included people with bipolar I disorder, as described in two separate articles (see the 'Further Information' section for more details). The study compared a new formulation of aripiprazole, given as an injection once every 2 months, with a once‑monthly injection of aripiprazole., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Objective: Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a new long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulation for administration every 2 months. A randomized, open-label, 32-week trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Ari 2MRTU 960 in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder (per DSM-5 criteria). This secondary analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of Ari 2MRTU 960 in the subpopulation of patients with schizophrenia., Methods: Patients were randomized to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 every 56 ± 2 days (4 injections scheduled) or aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) every 28 ± 2 days (8 injections scheduled). Data were collected during August 2019-July 2020 across 16 US sites. Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability, evaluated throughout. Secondary endpoints for efficacy in patients with schizophrenia included change from baseline at week 32 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression - Severity, and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment - Short Form scores, along with Clinical Global Impression - Improvement at week 32., Results: Patients with schizophrenia were randomized to Ari 2MRTU 960 (n = 92) or AOM 400 (n = 93). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between Ari 2MRTU 960 (66.3%) and AOM 400 (63.4%). The most frequently reported TEAE was increased weight (Ari 2MRTU 960: 21.7%; AOM 400: 18.3%). Patients in both treatment groups remained clinically stable throughout, with minimal change from baseline observed in efficacy parameters at week 32., Conclusions: Ari 2MRTU 960 was well tolerated in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia, with efficacy similar to AOM 400., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04030143., (© Copyright 2023 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a new long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulation for administration every 2 months. A 32-week trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Ari 2MRTU 960 in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder (BP-I) (per DSM-5 criteria). This secondary analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of Ari 2MRTU 960 in the subpopulation of patients with BP-I., Methods: Patients with BP-I were randomized to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 ( n  = 40) every 56 ± 2 days (4 injections scheduled) or aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400; n  = 41) every 28 ± 2 days (8 injections scheduled). Data were collected during August 2019-July 2020 across 16 US sites. Primary safety endpoints included reported adverse events (coded by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term), injection site reactions (assessments included a Visual Analog Scale [VAS] to evaluate patient-reported injection-site pain), and motoric symptoms. Secondary endpoints for efficacy included change from baseline at Week 32 in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment - Short Form (SWN-S) scores, and Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 32., Results: The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between Ari 2MRTU 960 (82.5% [33/40]) and AOM 400 (87.8% [36/41]; p  = .5468). The most frequently reported TEAE was increased weight (Ari 2MRTU 960: 25.0% [10/40]; AOM 400: 26.8% [11/41]; p  = 1). Injection-site pain was experienced by more patients in the Ari 2MRTU 960 group (25% [10/40]) versus the AOM 400 group (7.3% [3/41]; p  = .0622). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) VAS scores for patient-reported injection-site pain following the last injection were 1.2 (2.07) for Ari 2MRTU 960 group and 1.3 (2.19) for AOM 400 ( p  = .9479) (VAS scale range 0-100 [no pain-extreme pain]). No notable improvement or decline from baseline was observed in motoric symptoms in either treatment group. Patients in both treatment groups remained clinically stable for the entire 32-week trial duration, with minimal difference between treatment groups in the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at Week 32 in the YMRS Total ( p  = .8995), MADRS Total ( p  = .3185), and CGI-BP scores ( p  = .8485), and in mean CGI-I score ( p  = .7960). LS mean change from baseline in SWN-S score was greater for Ari 2MRTU 960 than for AOM 400 at Week 32 ( p  = .0169)., Conclusions: Ari 2MRTU 960 was well tolerated in patients with BP-I, with efficacy similar to AOM 400., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04030143.

Background: Aripiprazole 2-month ready-to-use 960 mg (Ari 2MRTU 960) is a new long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulation for gluteal administration every 2 months, currently being investigated for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder (BP-I). The objectives of this trial were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Ari 2MRTU 960, and the similarity of aripiprazole plasma concentrations following administration of Ari 2MRTU 960 or aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400), in adults with schizophrenia or BP-I., Methods: This was a 32-week open-label study. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 every 56 ± 2 days (four injections scheduled) or AOM 400 every 28 ± 2 days (eight injections scheduled). Participants received overlapping oral antipsychotic treatment with the first administration of study drug (there was no oral overlap for participants stabilized on AOM 400). Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated throughout the study. Primary safety endpoints included reported adverse events, injection site reactions, and extrapyramidal symptoms. Primary PK endpoints were plasma concentration of aripiprazole 56 days after the fourth dose of Ari 2MRTU 960 and 28 days after the eighth dose of AOM 400, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from Day 0 to 56 postdose after the fourth dose of Ari 2MRTU 960, or AUC from Day 0 to 28 after the seventh and eighth doses of AOM 400., Results: Of the 266 participants enrolled (schizophrenia, n = 185; BP-I, n = 81), 132 were randomized to receive Ari 2MRTU 960 and 134 were randomized to receive AOM 400. The majority (66.2%) of participants were male; 72.9% were Black or African American, and mean age was 47.3 years; demographic characteristics and baseline disease characteristics were generally well balanced between groups. Study completion rate was 77.3% in the Ari 2MRTU 960 group and 68.7% in the AOM 400 group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between Ari 2MRTU 960 (71.2%) and AOM 400 (70.9%). The most frequently reported TEAEs were increased weight (Ari 2MRTU 960: 22.7%; AOM 400: 20.9%) and injection-site pain (Ari 2MRTU 960: 18.2%; AOM 400: 9.0%). The geometric means ratio (GMR) of aripiprazole plasma concentrations on the last day following the final dosing for Ari 2MRTU 960 versus AOM 400 was 1.011 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.893-1.145), and the GMR of aripiprazole plasma exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) over the fourth Ari 2MRTU 960 dosing interval versus the seventh and eighth AOM 400 dosing intervals was 1.006 (90% CI 0.851-1.190)., Conclusions: Ari 2MRTU 960 was generally well tolerated in adults with schizophrenia or BP-I, with a safety profile comparable with that of AOM 400, and aripiprazole exposure equivalent to that with AOM 400 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04030143, registered on 23 July 2019)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose/background: Centanafadine is an inhibitor of norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin reuptake transporters under investigation for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)., Methods/procedures: Two phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d centanafadine sustained-release tablets versus placebo included adults (18-55 years of age) with a diagnosis of ADHD. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline at day 42 in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) total score and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale, respectively., Findings/results: Subjects randomized in study 1 (centanafadine 200 mg/d, n = 149; centanafadine 400 mg/d, n = 149; placebo, n = 148) and study 2 (centanafadine 200 mg/d, n = 145; centanafadine 400 mg/d, n = 143; placebo, n = 142) had moderate to severe ADHD (mean AISRS total score, 38.7 [SD, 6.8] across both studies). At day 42, statistically significant least-squares mean differences in AISRS total score were observed in favor of centanafadine versus placebo in study 1 (200 mg/d: -3.16, P = 0.019; 400 mg/d: -2.74, P = 0.039) and study 2 (200 mg/d: -4.01, P = 0.002; 400 mg/d: -4.47, P = 0.001). Effect sizes versus placebo were -0.28 for 200 mg/d and -0.24 for 400 mg/d in study 1 and -0.37 for 200 mg/d and -0.40 for 400 mg/d in study 2. The overall rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was low, but there was a small increase in TEAE occurrence with increasing dose. Incidences of serious TEAEs and abuse potential-related AEs were low., Implications/conclusions: These are the first large-scale studies to demonstrate the efficacy and safety profiles of 200 mg/d and 400 mg/d centanafadine in adults with ADHD., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)