1. Is sonographic measurement of head-perineum distance useful to predict obstetrical anal sphincter injury in case of vacuum delivery?
- Author
-
Charles Garabedian, Alix Plurien, Laure Benoit, Maeva Kyheng, Claire Thuillier, Maeva Sanchez, Anaïs Turcsak, Patrick Rozenberg, and Paul Berveiller
- Subjects
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Anal Canal ,General Medicine ,Perineum ,Delivery, Obstetric ,Lacerations ,Obstetric Labor Complications ,Cohort Studies ,Pregnancy ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Female ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Determine if head-perineum distance (HPD) measurement before vacuum extraction (VE) was predictive of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurrence.Retrospective, bicentric (Lille and Poissy, France) cohort study conducted from January 2019 to June 2020. All VE in singleton pregnancies of ≥34 weeks were included. HPD measurement was performed without compression of the tissues before each VE. The judgment criterion was the occurrence of an OASIS.Of 12 568 deliveries, VE was performed in 1093 (8.6%). Among these 1093 women undergoing VE, 675 (61.7%) with HPD measurement were included. OASIS was found in 6.5% of women (n = 44; 95% CI 4.5-8.7). HPD was not associated with OASIS (38.5 ± 12.6 mm in women with OASIS vs 37.4 ± 12.0 mm in women without; adjusted OR [aOR] per 5 mm increase = 0.92; 95% CI 0.79-1.06). Increased HPD was associated with higher risk of sequential extraction (aOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.32), extraction duration10 min (aOR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.23) and shoulder dystocia (aOR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.40).Ultrasound-measured head-perineum distance does not predict the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injury during a VE. The interest of HPD is more about predicting the success or difficulty of VE rather its specific complications.
- Published
- 2022