Search

Objectives: To compare the effects of whole‐body vibration (WBV) and aerobic exercise on the hormonal profile and inflammatory status in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS). Methods: A prospective, randomized, pre–post‐test, single‐blind, controlled trial was conducted in 105 women diagnosed with PMS. They were randomized into three equal groups. All women received magnesium and vitamin B complex supplementation once daily. WBV training was added three times per week to the WBV group. The aerobic exercise group added aerobic exercise three times per week, while the control group received no additional intervention. The Premenstrual Syndrome Questionnaire (PMSQ) was used to assess PMS symptoms. Blood analysis was performed to measure hormone assays (estradiol, progesterone, prolactin, and cortisol) and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein at the start and after the end of the treatment program. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between WBV and aerobic exercise according to PMSQ and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (P = 0.99 and P = 0.98, respectively), but there was a statistically significant difference between both groups in cortisol, progesterone, prolactin, and estradiol (P = 0.001), with more favor given to the WBV group. Conclusion: WBV and aerobic exercise have positive effects on women with PMS, with more favor given to WBV. Synopsis: Whole‐body vibration and aerobic exercise have positive effects in women with premenstrual syndrome with more favor to whole‐body vibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Obstetric venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a life-threating burden and it is one of the major causes of maternal morbidity and mortality with an increased incidence throughout the last decades. The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of VTE, types of prophylaxis received, and factors determining prophylaxis in women at VTE risk during pregnancy and puerperium at a tertiary hospital for 1 year.Methods: This is a prospective study that was carried out at Minia maternity university hospital, Egypt during the period from June 2018 to June 2019. The study included women attended the hospital at risk of VTE as per the RCOG guidelines. Full history, patient characteristics, and VTE risk factors were assessed.Results: During the study period, a total of 901 women attended the hospital and perceived at risk of VTE (298 cases during pregnancy and 603 cases during puerperium), about half of them were mild in intensity. They comprise 8.22% of the total deliveries during the study period (n = 10,956). About two-thirds of them (71.5%) had a cesarean delivery. Varicose veins were found in 209 cases (23.2%), previous VTE in 189 cases (21.0%), previous superficial vein thrombosis was recorded in 240 cases (26.6%) and previous arterial ischemic events in 83 cases (9.2%). The vast majority of patients (99.6%) received the pharmacological type of prophylaxis (55.6% of them received unfractionated heparin and the rest of them 43.9% received Aspirin). Only six cases developed VTE from the total included cases with an incidence of 0.55/1000 maternities (0.055%). Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) and cesarean delivery were significant factors that determine VTE prophylaxis with an odds ratio of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.20-2.35, p < .01) and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.49-2.80, p < .01), respectively.Conclusion: The incidence of women perceived at VTE risk was 8.22%, about half of them were mild in intensity. The risk of VTE was higher during the postpartum period than that during pregnancy. The incidence of VTE was 0.55/1000 overall maternities (0.055%). The pharmacological type of prophylaxis was the predominant used type. Obesity and cesarean delivery were significant factors determining VTE prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effect of early and delayed pushing during the second stage of labour in women with occipitoposterior (OP) malposition. It included 184 nulliparous women with OP position randomised to early pushing in which women were allowed to push within one hour after full cervical dilatation or delayed pushing in which women were asked not to push for maximum of three hours or start pushing when the vertex was visible. The primary outcome was successful vaginal delivery. The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the early pushing group (80.4 vs. 60.9%, p=.004) while the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (30.4 vs. 15.4%) and CS (8.7 vs. 4.3%) was significantly higher in the delayed pushing group. Women in the delayed pushing group showed a significantly longer duration of the second stage (129.4 ± 7.5 vs. 61.6 ± 15.3 minutes, p<.001) and shorter duration of pushing (219.8 ± 74.8 vs. 693.9 ± 145.2 seconds, p<.001).The rate of 2nd and 3rd degree perineal lacerations (19.6 and 13% vs. 5.4 and 8.7% respectively, p=.013) and vaginal tears (41.3 vs. 8.7%, p<.001) was significantly higher in the early pushing group. We concluded that early pushing during the second stage of labour is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and vaginal and perineal lacerations. Clinical trial registration NCT03121274. What is already known on this subject? Occipitoposterior malposition is common during delivery especially in primigravida and is associated with higher rates of instrumental delivery and caesarean section. It can be managed through early or delayed pushing. What the results of this study add? Early pushing is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery, perineal and vaginal tears, shorter duration of second stage of labour, shorter duration of pushing, lower rates of both instrumental vaginal delivery and caesarean section. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early pushing during the second stage of labour is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and vaginal and perineal lacerations in women with OP malposition and should be tried and not delaying the pushing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of rectal misoprostol with intrauterine misoprostol in the reduction of blood loss during and after cesarean delivery. Methods: Ninety‐eight pregnant women, all candidates for elective cesarean delivery, were equally randomized into two groups: the rectal group (received preoperative misoprostol rectally) and the intrauterine group (received intrauterine misoprostol after the delivery of the placenta). The primary outcome was the estimated blood loss (EBL) during cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of excessive blood loss (>1000 mL) within the first 24 hours postoperatively and the occurrence of any maternal or fetal side effects. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding either the EBL (693.12 ± 139.09 vs 692.39 ± 132.83; P=0.979) or the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage (>1000 mL) (6.1% vs 4.1%; P=0.99. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were significantly higher in the intrauterine group compared to the rectal group. Conclusion: Insertion of intrauterine misoprostol is as effective as rectal insertion in reducing blood loss during and after cesarean delivery; however, it has a safer neonatal outcome and is more convenient when administered during cesarean delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03723031. Intrauterine insertion of misoprostol is safer, more convenient, and as effective as rectal insertion in reducing blood loss during and after cesarean delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]