Search

Dose to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) may be significant in patients receiving left-sided irradiation for breast cancer. We investigated if prospective contouring and avoidance of the LAD during treatment planning were associated with lower LAD dose.We reviewed dosimetric plans for 323 patients who received left whole breast or chest wall irradiation with or without internal mammary node (IMLN) coverage between 1/2014 and 1/2019 at a single institution. The LAD was contoured prospectively for 155 cases, and techniques were utilized to minimize LAD dose. Dose-volume-histograms from these patients were compared to those of 168 patients for whom the LAD was contoured retrospectively after treatment completion. EQD2 was calculated to account for fractionation differences.Compared to cases where the LAD was contoured retrospectively (n = 126), prospective LAD contouring (n = 124) was associated with lower unadjusted median max and mean LAD doses for 250 patients receiving whole-breast irradiation (WBI) without IMLN coverage: 8.5 Gy vs 5.2 Gy (p0.0001) and 3.6 Gy vs 2.7 Gy (p0.0001), respectively. EQD2 median max and mean LAD doses were also lower with prospective LAD contouring: 5.2 Gy vs 3.0 Gy (p0.0001) and 1.9 Gy vs 1.5 Gy (p0.0001), respectively. Compared to cases where the LAD was contoured retrospectively (n = 42), prospective LAD contouring (n = 31) was associated with lower max LAD doses for 73 patients with IMLN coverage: 20.4 Gy vs 14.3 Gy (p = 0.042). There was a nonsignificant reduction in median mean LAD dose: 6.2 Gy vs 6.1 Gy (p = 0.33). LAD doses were reduced while maintaining IMLN coverage (mean V90%Prospective contouring and avoidance of the LAD were associated with lower max and mean LAD doses in patients receiving WBI and with lower max LAD doses in patients receiving IMLN treatment. Further reduction in LAD dose may require stricter optimization weighting or compromise in IMLN coverage.

Purpose After definitive surgery, women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer are observed. However, some will require salvage radiation therapy for recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience using salvage radiation for recurrent endometrial cancer in patients who did not receive upfront adjuvant therapy. Methods and Materials Twenty-eight women with endometrial cancer who had undergone initial definitive hysterectomy without adjuvant therapy developed isolated local or regional recurrence and were treated with salvage radiation in our department from 2004 to 2018. Salvage radiation included whole pelvic radiation, vaginal brachytherapy, or both. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, and toxicities were recorded and analyzed. Results The median time to first recurrence was 1.7 years. First recurrences consisted of local recurrence in 23 patients, regional recurrence in 4, and both in 1. The median times from hysterectomy to first recurrence, local and regional, were 1.2 and 4.0 years, respectively. All patients underwent salvage radiation for management of their first recurrence. The median total equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions for this treatment was 67.6 Gy (37.5–81.8 Gy). Two second recurrences occurred following salvage treatment, both local recurrence, at 6.5 and 13.5 months after radiation. The 2-year rates of local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 93%, 80%, and 88%, respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated, with low rates of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. Conclusions In this group of patients, salvage radiation therapy for local or regional recurrence of endometrial cancer resulted in excellent control with low rates of acute and chronic toxicities.

OBJECTIVES Radiation is frequently added to chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer. Multiple adjuvant therapy sequencing options exist, and little data is available to compare these. We compared outcomes and toxicities after "sandwich" chemoradiation (chemotherapy, then radiation, then chemotherapy) and nonsandwich sequences (chemotherapy then radiation, radiation then chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation). MATERIALS AND METHODS We recorded baseline characteristics, adjuvant treatment details, clinical outcomes, and toxicities for stage III to IVA patients who underwent surgical staging followed by both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy at our institution. Effects of adjuvant treatment order (sandwich or nonsandwich) on these outcomes were analyzed. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS We identified 107 patients with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Five-year local, regional, and distant recurrence were 7%, 15%, and 33%; disease-free and overall survival were 61% and 68%, respectively. Outcomes did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of acute toxicity did not differ by sequence group. The overall rate of chronic toxicity was significantly lower for sandwich patients (P

There is limited retrospective evidence addressing the utility of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0 breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) comparing overall survival (OS) in T3N0 patients treated with mastectomy alone (MTX) or with PMRT.We performed a matched-cohort analysis of NCDB breast cancer patients with pT3N0 disease who did not receive NAC, or cT3N0 patients who received NAC treated between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights.We identified 13,901 eligible patients. In the pT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 47 months for the MTX group and 50 months for the PMRT group. In the cT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 44 months for the MTX group and 46 months for the PMRT group. OS was higher in pT3N0 patients treated with PMRT compared to MTX: 7-year OS of 74% vs. 65% (P 0.001). Doubly robust multivariable analysis showed an association between PMRT and improved OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89, P 0.001). There was no benefit to PMRT in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). In the NAC cohort, PMRT did not change OS, with 7-year OS of 78% with MTX and 79% with PMRT. There was a trend of improved OS with PMRT in patients with residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.07).PMRT improves OS in patients with pT3N0 disease, but the benefit appears limited to those who do not receive AC. PMRT does not improve OS in patients with cT3N0 disease who receive NAC, but there might be a benefit in patients with a poor response to chemotherapy. However, longer follow-up may be needed to make a definitive conclusion about the benefit of PMRT in patients who receive chemotherapy.

Brachytherapy is an effective treatment modality for a wide range of malignancies. However, brachytherapy utilization for both prostate and gynecologic malignancies has significantly declined over the last 20 years in favor of external beam radiation techniques. The cause of this decline is multifactorial, with logistical challenges, lower reimbursement, and inadequate training contributing to the preference of many radiation oncologists to more frequently recommend external beam radiation therapy. While the authors recognize the application of brachytherapy to a wider range of disease presentations among which include breast, skin, head and neck, and connective tissue cancers, in this review, we will review the analyses supporting brachytherapy as a cost-effective component of the management in patients with prostate, cervix, and endometrial cancer.

Recent retrospective studies suggest improved overall survival (OS) with breast conserving therapy (BCT), including breast conserving surgery and adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy, compared to mastectomy in the modern era. The patient subset most likely to benefit from BCT remains unclear, and the role of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in this context is unknown. We compared BCT to mastectomy in early-stage, node-negative breast cancer. We further explored outcomes after stratification by RS and age.We performed a matched-cohort analysis of National Cancer Database (NCDB) patients with pT1-2, pN0, cM0 breast cancer treated between 2006 and 2014 with BCT or mastectomy. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights.We identified 144,263 eligible patients treated with BCT and 87,379 patients treated with mastectomy. After IPTW-matching, OS was higher with BCT compared to mastectomy: 5-year OS of 94.4% vs. 91.8% (P 0.001) and 7-year OS of 90% vs. 85.2% (P 0.001). Doubly robust multivariable analysis showed an association between BCT and improved OS (HR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.64-0.69, P 0.001). In a subset analysis, BCT was associated with improved OS in patients with RS25, but not patients with RS ≤25. When stratified by age, only patients50 years had improved OS with BCT.BCT is associated with improved OS compared to mastectomy in women with early-stage, node-negative breast cancer. The improvement in OS with BCT appears to be most pronounced in patients with high RS and50 years of age. Prospective validation of these findings is required.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and toxicity in patients with endometrial cancer per our institutional adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) fractionation scheme. Methods and Materials: We identified women with International Federation of Gynecology and Oncology stages I and II endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging and adjuvant high-dose-rate VBT without external beam radiation. All patients received 30 Gy in 6 fractions to the upper one-third of the vagina, prescribed to a depth of 5 mm and delivered twice weekly. Toxicities were prospectively elicited at each follow up, and rates of recurrence and survival were retrospectively assessed. Results: We identified 247 eligible patients treated between 1992 and 2018 with a median follow up of 5.8 years (range, 0.1-24.7 years). Most patients had stage I disease (52% stage IA; 37% stage IB), and 11% of patients were stage II. Deep myometrial invasion was predictive of local recurrence (P = .002). The 5-year rates of local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastases were 5%, 5%, and 7%, respectively. Five-year overall and disease-free survival were 91% and 83%, respectively. The most common grade 1 toxicities were acute fatigue (11% crude rate), urinary frequency (11%), chronic (>6 months) urinary frequency (13%), urinary incontinence (13%), and vaginal stenosis (21%). There were few grade 2 toxicities (all

The appropriateness of substituting sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with residual lymph node (LN) disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare survival following SLND and ALND in breast cancer patients with residual LN disease. We analyzed NCDB patients, treated between 2006 and 2014, with cT1–3, cN1, cM0 breast cancer and residual disease in 1–3 axillary LNs (ypN1) following NAC. Patients were grouped into those who received SLND (defined as removal of ≤ 4 LNs) and RNI, or ALND and RNI. Patients were matched for all patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. We identified 1313 eligible patients in the ALND group and 304 patients in the SLND group. For the matched cohorts, SLND was associated with significantly lower survival in both univariate and doubly robust multivariable analyses (MVA) (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.2, P

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Across training programs, resident evaluations are based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) Six Core Competencies: practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI), patient care (PC), systems-based practice (SBP), medical knowledge (MK), interpersonal communication skills (ICS), and professionalism (PR). With few studies on resident assessment within radiation oncology (RO), we analyze characteristics of the existing assessment methods. We also analyze factors involved in the evaluations of faculty by residents. We hypothesize that both faculty and resident evaluations vary significantly in length and criteria used. MATERIALS/METHODS Twelve academic RO residency programs provided evaluation forms: faculty resident evaluation (FRE), n = 12, and resident faculty evaluation (RFE), n = 11. Data on the frequency and types of questions were collected. Questions were coded into 9 categories for RFE: teaching skills, patient care, personal qualities (approachability, responsiveness, demeanor and attitude), result of rotation (assessing the degree to which faculty increased knowledge, desire to learn and independent inquiry by end of rotation), knowledge, mentoring skills, learning climate, research, and communication. Analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences between institutions and between categories. RESULTS Across all institutions, FRE was based on the Six Core Competencies with an average of 19 questions (standard deviation (SD) 11, range 5-47) in total. PR had the most questions (mean 3.7, SD 2.9) followed by PC (mean 3.3, SD 2.8). SBP and PBLI had the fewest questions. ANOVA did not show significant variation in the number of questions between the categories (F = 0.78, P = 0.6). There was a significant difference in the mean number of questions used for assessing the competencies across institutions (F = 6.6, P < 0.01). RFE varied in length, formatting, and content of evaluations across institutions (F = 7.8, P < 0.01). Teaching and personal qualities were evaluated the most with 9/11 institutions posing ≥1 question about these factors. The mean +/- SD for RFE questions per category was personal quality 4.3 +/- 3.1, teaching skills 3.9 +/- 2.0, communication 3.7 +/- 3.0, result of rotation 3.7 +/- 2.1, knowledge 3.5 +/- 2.6, patient care 2.7 +/- 1.5, mentoring skills 2.7 +/- 1.5, learning climate 2.0 +/- 0.6, research 2.0 +/- 1.0. CONCLUSION FRE is primarily based on ACGME core competencies for RO. However, RFE varies by institution. Standardized criteria should be developed for RFE to obtain feedback that can be used to improve residency programs. This study is part of a larger project collecting resident and faculty perspectives with the goal to ultimately develop consensus FRE and RFE recommendations.

Purpose/Objective(s) Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) can reduce treatment time and spare normal breast tissue. Techniques for APBI include applicator-based, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), and interstitial implant-based. Data comparing these various APBI modalities and associated outcomes are lacking in the literature. We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with APBI to compare treatment techniques and report outcomes. Materials/Methods Patients treated with APBI between 1990 and 2019 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, clinical and pathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed using a single-institution database. Outcomes were updated through August 2020. Statistical methods included Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test of independence, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results A total of 926 APBI cases were analyzed, a majority of which were invasive ductal carcinoma (50.6%). Comparing applicator-based to EBRT, IORT, and implant-based, there was no difference in overall survival, freedom from local recurrence, or freedom from mastectomy (Table 1). 5-, 10-, and 25-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was 1.5% (0.87-2.5%), 3.3% (2.3-4.7%), and 5.2% (3.9-6.7%), with no difference between treatment techniques. The median follow-up time was 121.6 months (66-165.7 months). Cosmesis was good/excellent in 91%, 84%, and 93%, for applicator, EBRT, and interstitial techniques, respectively. Late toxicities assessed included pigmentary changes, telangiectasias, induration/fibrosis, and fat necrosis. The majority of late toxicities were none or Grade 1, with less than 10% of patients experiencing Grade 2 or greater toxicity. Conclusion With our 30-year single-institution APBI experience using various treatment techniques, long term outcomes of both disease control and local morbidity demonstrate that the various APBI techniques are equally effective for suitable early-stage breast cancer patients. As evolving radiotherapy paradigms incorporate more shortened time-course treatments, these results affirm that APBI remains a viable alternative for such favorable patients.

Object Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for vertebral metastases has emerged as a promising technique, offering high rates of symptom relief and local control combined with low risk of toxicity. Nonetheless, local failure or vertebral instability may occur after spine SBRT, generating the need for subsequent surgery in the irradiated region. This study evaluated whether there is an increased incidence of surgical complications in patients previously treated with SBRT at the index level. Methods Based upon a retrospective international database of 704 cases treated with SBRT for vertebral metastases, 30 patients treated at 6 different institutions were identified who underwent surgery in a region previously treated with SBRT. Results Thirty patients, median age 59 years (range 27–84 years) underwent SBRT for 32 vertebral metastases followed by surgery at the same vertebra. Median follow-up time from SBRT was 17 months. In 17 cases, conventional radiotherapy had been delivered prior to SBRT at a median dose of 30 Gy in median 10 fractions. SBRT was administered with a median prescription dose of 19.3 Gy (range 15–65 Gy) delivered in median 1 fraction (range 1–17) (median EQD2/10 = 44 Gy). The median time interval between SBRT and surgical salvage therapy was 6 months (range 1–39 months). Reasons for subsequent surgery were pain (n = 28), neurological deterioration (n = 15) or fracture of the vertebral body (n = 13). Open surgical decompression (n = 24) and/or stabilization (n = 18) were most frequently performed; Five patients (6 vertebrae) were treated without complications with vertebroplasty only. Increased fibrosis complicating the surgical procedure was explicitly stated in one surgical report. Two durotomies occurred which were closed during the operation, associated with a neurological deficit in one patient. Median blood loss was 500 ml, but five patients had a blood loss of more than 1 l during the procedure. Delayed wound healing was reported in two cases. One patient died within 30 days of the operation. Conclusion In this series of surgical interventions following spine SBRT, the overall complication rate was 19%, which appears comparable to primary surgery without previous SBRT. Prior spine SBRT does not appear to significantly increase the risk of intra- and post-surgical complications.

Purpose We examined the distribution of pretreatment nodal metastases to the level I axilla (Ax-L1) to assess the appropriateness of current breast atlases and provide guidelines in relationship to easily identifiable anatomic landmarks for accurate delineation of this lymph node (LN) basin. Methods and Materials Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and biopsy-proven metastatic Ax-L1 LNs were identified. We related the location of each LN to its most adjacent rib and its distance from the bottom of the humeral head, axillary vessels, and a line connecting the anterior aspects of the pectoralis and latissimus dorsi muscles (P-L line). LNs were mapped onto a representative planning computed tomography scan, and their distribution was used to validate the current Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness breast atlases. Furthermore, we examined metastases to a subregion encompassing the superolateral Ax-L1, irradiation of which correlates highly with lymphedema. Results We identified 106 eligible patients with 107 biopsied LNs. All LNs fell between the second and fifth ribs (mean, 3.8 ± 0.56). Mean distance from the inferior aspect of the humeral head was 4.3 ± 1.6 cm (range, 0.3-8.4). Mean distance from the inferior aspect of the axillary vessels was 2.9 ± 1.5 cm (range, –0.6 to 5.4). Mean distance from the P-L line was 0.01 ± 1.9 cm (range, –2.2 to 2.4); negative and positive values denote medial or lateral to the P-L line. A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group–compliant Ax-L1 consensus contour, created from contours by 4 attending breast radiation oncologists, partially or fully missed 45% of mapped LNs. European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology– and Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness–compliant Ax-L1 similarly missed 46% and 34% of mapped LNs, respectively. LNs were most frequently missed in the lateral direction. The superolateral Ax-L1 encompassed 9.3% of the mapped LNs. Conclusions A significant percentage of at-risk Ax-L1 tissue falls outside current contouring atlases. We propose expansion of the recommended Ax-L1 borders, most notably in the lateral direction.

BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the spine provides superior tumor control, but vertebral compression fractures are increased and the pathophysiological process underneath is not well understood. Data on histopathological changes, particularly after salvage SBRT (sSBRT) following conventional irradiation, are scarce. OBJECTIVE To investigate surgical specimens after sSBRT and primary SBRT (pSBRT) regarding histopathological changes. METHODS We assessed 704 patients treated with spine SBRT 2006 to 2012. Thirty patients underwent salvage surgery; 23 histopathological reports were available. Clinical and histopathological findings were analyzed for sSBRT (69.6%) and pSBRT (30.4%). RESULTS Mean time to surgery after sSBRT/pSBRT was 8.3/10.3 mo (P = .64). Reason for surgery included pain (sSBRT/pSBRT: 12.5%/71.4%, P = .25), fractures (sSBRT/pSBRT: 37.5%/28.6%, P = .68), and neurological symptoms (sSBRT/pSBRT: 68.8%/42.9%, P = .24). Radiological tumor progression after sSBRT/pSBRT was seen in 71.4%/42.9% (P = .2). Most specimens displayed viable/proliferative tumor (sSBRT/pSBRT: 62.5%/71.4%, P = .68 and 56.3%/57.1%, P = .97). Few specimens showed soft tissue necrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 20%/28.6%, P = .66), osteonecrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 14.3%/16.7%, P = .89), or bone marrow fibrosis (sSBRT/pSBRT: 42.9%/33.3%, P = .69). Tumor bed necrosis was more common after sSBRT (81.3%/42.9%, P = .066). Radiological tumor progression correlated with viable/proliferative tumor (P = .03/P = .006) and tumor bed necrosis (P = .03). Fractures were increased with bone marrow fibrosis (P = .07), but not with osteonecrosis (P = .53) or soft tissue necrosis (P = .19). Neurological symptoms were common with radiological tumor progression (P = .07), but not with fractures (P = .18). CONCLUSION For both, sSBRT and pSBRT, histopathological changes were similar. Neurological symptoms were attributable to tumor progression and pathological fractures were not associated with osteonecrosis or tumor progression.

Although whole breast irradiation (WBI) represents the standard radiotherapy technique in breast conserving therapy, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has emerged as an option to reduce treatment duration with comparable clinical outcomes. The purpose of this analysis is to present long-term clinical outcomes between WBI and APBI.A total of 3009 patients were treated with breast conserving therapy at a single institution between 1980 and 2012. Among them, 2528 patients received WBI and 481 received APBI (interstitial or balloon based). A matched-pair analysis was performed with patients matched by age (±3 years), stage (T-stage vs. T1 vs. T2), and estrogen receptor status (+/-). All patients had a minimum of 12 months follow-up. A total of 274 matches (ratio 1:1) were made.No differences between groups were noted with respect to clinicopathologic features; WBI patients demonstrated a trend for slightly larger tumors (1.3 vs. 1.1 cm, P=0.06). At 10 years, no differences were noted with respect to rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (4% vs. 4%, P=0.11), regional recurrence (1% vs. 1%, P=0.20), contralateral breast failure (9% vs. 3%, P=0.06), or distant metastases (3% vs. 6%, P=0.47) for WBI and APBI, respectively. In addition, 10-year disease-free survival (93% vs. 91%, P=0.10) and overall survival (83% vs. 75%, P=0.34) were similar. Long-term cosmesis was good to excellent in 94% of WBI patients versus 95% of APBI patients (P=0.78).At 10 years, no differences in recurrence or survival were found between patients undergoing WBI or brachytherapy-based APBI.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify factors contributing to an increased risk for vertebral compression fracture (VCF) following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal tumors. METHODS A total of 594 tumors were treated with spinal SBRT as primary treatment or re-irradiation at 8 different institutions as part of a multi-institutional research consortium. Patients underwent LINAC-based, image-guided SBRT to a median dose of 20 Gy (range 8–40 Gy) in a median of 1 fraction (range 1–5 fractions). Median patient age was 62 years. Seventy-one percent of tumors were osteolytic, and a preexisting vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was present in 24% of cases. Toxicity was assessed following treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression method to determine parameters predictive for post-SBRT VCF. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 10.1 months (range 0.03–57 months), 80% of patients had local tumor control. At the time of last imaging follow-up, at a median of 8.8 months after SBRT, 3% had a new VCF, and 2.7% had a progressive VCF. For development of any (new or progressive) VCF following SBRT, the following factors were predictive for VCF on univariate analysis: short interval from primary diagnosis to SBRT (less than 36.8 days), solitary metastasis, no additional bone metastases, no prior chemotherapy, preexisting VCF, no MRI used for target delineation, tumor volume of 37.3 cm3 or larger, equivalent 2-Gy-dose (EQD2) tumor of 41.8 Gy or more, and EQD2 spinal cord Dmax of 46.1 Gy or more. Preexisting VCF, solitary metastasis, and prescription dose of 38.4 Gy or more were predictive on multivariate analysis. The following factors were predictive of a new VCF on univariate analysis: solitary metastasis, no additional bone metastases, and no MRI used for target delineation. Presence of a solitary metastasis and lack of MRI for target delineation remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS A VCF following SBRT is more likely to occur following treatment for a solitary spinal metastasis, reflecting a more aggressive treatment approach in patients with adequately controlled systemic disease. Higher prescription dose and a preexisting VCF also put patients at increased risk for post-SBRT VCF. In these patients, pre-SBRT cement augmentation could be considered to decrease the risk of subsequent VCF.

Purpose We report the outcomes associated with 3 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy regimens used as monotherapy for favorable-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Four hundred ninety-four patients with stage ≤T2b prostate cancer, Gleason score ≤7, and prostate-specific antigen levels ≤15 ng/mL underwent HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy. Of those, 319 received 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 79 received 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 96 received 27 Gy in 2 fractions. Acute and chronic genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were defined as side effects occurring ≤6 and >6 months, respectively, after radiation therapy (RT) and were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The time to toxicity was calculated from the date of RT completion. Variables were analyzed with χ2 test. P values Results The median overall follow-up time was 4 years (range, 5.5, 3.5, and 2.5 years for 38 Gy, 24 Gy, and 27 Gy, respectively, P Conclusions The acute and chronic toxicity profiles associated with these 3 HDR brachytherapy schedules were similar and were well tolerated. Acceptable grade 2, minimal grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 toxicities were seen. This, combined with the fact that the clinical outcomes were similar, leads to the conclusion that all 3 regimens may be acceptable options for the management of low-risk to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Brachytherapy-based APBI (bAPBI) shortens treatment duration and limits dose to normal tissue. While studies have demonstrated similar local control when comparing bAPBI and whole breast irradiation using intensity modulated radiotherapy (WBI-IMRT), comparison of late side effects is limited. Here, we report chronic toxicity profiles associated with these two treatment modalities.1034 patients with early stage breast cancer were treated at a single institution; 489 received standard-fractionation WBI-IMRT between 2000 and 2013 and 545 received bAPBI (interstitial 40%, applicator-based 60%) between 1993 and 2013. Chronic toxicity was evaluated ≥6 months utilizing CTCAE version 3.0; cosmesis was evaluated using the Harvard scale.Median follow-up was 4.6 years (range 0.1-13.4) for WBI-IMRT versus 6.7 years (range 0.1-20.1) for bAPBI (p0.001). Compared to WBI-IMRT, bAPBI was associated with higher rates of ≥grade 2 seroma formation (14.4% vs 2.9%, p0.001), telangiectasia (12.3% vs 2.1%, p = 0.002) and symptomatic fat necrosis (10.2% vs 3.6%, p0.001). Lower rates of hyperpigmentation were observed (5.8% vs 14.5%; p = 0.001). Infection rates were similar (3.3% vs 1.3%, p = 0.07). There was no difference between rates of fair (6.1% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.30) or poor (0.2% vs. 0.5%, p = NS) cosmesis. Mastectomy rates for local recurrence (3.1% for WBI-IMRT and 1.2% for bAPBI, p = 0.06), or for other reasons (0.8% and 0.6%, p = 0.60) were similar between groups.With 5-year follow-up, WBI-IMRT and bAPBI are associated with similar, acceptable rates of toxicity. These data further support the utilization of bAPBI as a modality to deliver adjuvant radiation in a safe and efficacious manner.

Limited 5-year data exist on clinical outcomes and toxicities for patients undergoing 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) APBI.Two hundred five patients were treated with 3D-CRT APBI between August, 2000 and December, 2011. Cases with1 year of follow-up were analyzed for cosmesis, chronic toxicities, and clinical outcomes. Outcome by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Panel (CP) group were also compared. Rates of excellent and good cosmesis for 3D-CRT were evaluated over time for stability.One hundred ninety-two patients were evaluated; median follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 1.0-11.2 years). Seventy-two patients (37.5%) were categorized as ASTRO CP subgroup 'suitable,' 89 (46.4%) 'cautionary,' and 31 (16.1%) 'unsuitable.' At 5 years, the rate of IBTR, regional recurrence, distant metastases, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were 0%, 0%, 2%, 99%, and 92%, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of patients had excellent cosmesis, 44% good cosmesis, 15% fair cosmesis, and 4% poor cosmesis. No statistically significant differences in excellent (37% vs. 37%; P = .99) or good (49% vs. 37%; P = .28) cosmesis were noted between patients with5 years follow-up and those with ≥ 5 years follow-up. The rates of grade III fibrosis and telangiectasia were 7.5% and 7.6%, respectively.In the largest group of patients published to date using 3D-CRT to deliver APBI, no local recurrences were noted at 5 years. More than 80% of patients had excellent or good cosmesis.

Purpose Limited outcomes exist in patients who develop an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate these outcomes and patterns of failure in our cohort of patients undergoing APBI. Methods and Materials A total of 534 patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated with APBI between 1993 and 2010. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related variables were analyzed. Clinical outcomes, including further IBTR, regional recurrence, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed. Results Eighteen (3.3%) patients developed an IBTR, for a 5-year actuarial rate of 2.0%; 14 (77.8%) of the recurrences were thought to represent new primary cancers. After IBTR, 13 (72.2%) patients were managed with salvage mastectomy and 4 (22.2%) patients with a second attempt at breast-conserving therapy. Five-year rates of disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival after salvage mastectomy for IBTR were 81%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. In the 4 patients treated with a second attempt at breast-conserving therapy, no IBTR, axillary failure, regional recurrence, or distant metastases were noted at 5 years. Conclusions IBTRs that developed after APBI resulted in excellent clinical outcomes comparable with those observed after whole-breast irradiation.

Management of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at a single institution was reviewed to determine long-term clinical outcomes after treatment with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Data from all patient-cases with DCIS who received BCT between 1980 and 1993 were reviewed. Patient demographics and pathologic factors were analyzed for their effect on outcomes, including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and survival. BCT included breast-conserving surgery followed by external-beam radiotherapy to the whole breast, with 86 % of patients receiving a lumpectomy cavity boost. The median dose to the whole breast was 50 Gy and 60.4 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. A total of 129 cases were evaluated; the median follow-up was 19.3 years. Twenty-one patients developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), 76.2 % of which were invasive (n = 16). Fourteen recurrences (66 %) were within the same breast quadrant (true recurrence), while an additional 7 cases developed an IBTR elsewhere in the breast. True recurrences were more prevalent in women

Limited long-term data exist regarding outcomes for patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), particularly, when stratified by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Statement (CS) risk groups. The purpose of this analysis is to present 5- and 7-year outcomes following APBI based on CS groupings. A total of 690 patients with early-stage breast cancer underwent APBI from 1993 to 2012, receiving interstitial brachytherapy (n=195), balloon-based brachytherapy (n=290), or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (n=205) at a single institution. Patients were stratified into suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable groups with 5-year outcomes analyzed. Seven-year outcomes were analyzed for a subset with follow-up of ≥2 years (n=625). Median follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 0.1 to 20.1 y). Patients assigned to cautionary and unsuitable categories were more likely to have high-grade tumors (21% to 25% vs. 9%, P=0.001), receive chemotherapy (15% to 38% vs. 6%, P

To investigate the impact of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) prostate cancer after either external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or the combination of EBRT with low-dose rate brachytherapy boost (combo).Between 1998 and 2008, 467 patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT (n = 326) or combo (low-dose rate to 90-108 Gy using I-125 followed by EBRT) (n = 141). Freedom from biochemical failure, freedom from metastasis (FFM), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival were evaluated.Combo patients were younger (66 vs. 72 years, p0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 3.7 vs. 4.4, p0.001). EBRT patients had higher tumor stages (T3-4: 30% vs. 21%, p = 0.03) and lower Gleason scores (8-10: 61% vs. 75%, p = 0.01). Androgen deprivation therapy use was similar between cohorts (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.5), but EBRT patients had longer androgen deprivation therapy use (median 14 vs. 12 months, p = 0.05). GP5 predicted worse FFM (p0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.8-6.2]) and CSS (p0.001, HR 5.9, 95% CI 2.7-12.9) for the EBRT group, but not for the combo group (p = 0.86, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.1-2.4 for metastasis and p = 0.5, HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.33-8.0 for CSS). In those with GP5 (n = 143), combo was associated with improved outcomes in all endpoints. On univariate analysis, 5-year outcomes for combo vs. EBRT were as follows: freedom from biochemical failure 89% vs. 65%, FFM 89% vs. 67%, CSS 93% vs. 78%, and overall survival 88% vs. 67% (p0.05 for all).Combo was associated with improved outcomes for men with GP5 prostate cancer. This highlights the importance of local therapy, especially in patients with the highest pathologic grade disease.

To compare reimbursement and cost efficacy between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques.Four hundred fifty-three patients were treated with APBI using either 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT, n=207) or balloon-based brachytherapy (BB) [single-lumen (SL, n=161) and multilumen (ML, n=85)] between March 2000 and October 2011. To evaluate cost-effectiveness, reimbursement by treatment technique was calculated based on 2011 Medicare schedules. Facility costs were generated by technique based on ICD-9 codes. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER), which compares cost with clinical outcomes, were calculated according to the difference in reimbursement to the criteria being evaluated.With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the 5-year rate of local recurrence was 1.9% for all patients (3D-CRT, 0%; BB, 4.1%; P=0.23). When pooled, BB patients had a significant improvement in excellent/good cosmesis (91.6% vs. 80.0%; P=0.03). Rates of combined grade 2 or higher dermatitis, hyper/hypopigmentation, pain, or fibrosis per technique were 62%, 28%, and 34% for 3D-CRT, SL, and ML patients, respectively (P=0.26). The ICER per percent improved cosmesis for SL/ML was $519/$850 based on reimbursement and $301/$643 based on cost compared with 3D-CRT.On the basis of ICER, brachytherapy for APBI is a cost-effective option with regard to cosmesis and toxicity. This economic analysis suggests the increased cost of applicator-based brachytherapy may be justified in appropriately selected patients.

45 Background: To assess if partial vs whole breast irradiation (RT) in treatment of the various biological (bio-) subtypes of breast cancer would lead to differing clinical results, a match pair analysis of APBI vs WBI was undertaken. Methods: Between 3/1993 and 9/2013 all breast CA patients (pts) treated at one institute with either APBI or WBI were matched 1:1 by follow-up (FU) +/- 15 yrs, stage and bio-subtype. This yielded 772 pts of whom 640 were luminal A, 42 luminal B, 58 triple neg (TNBC), 6 HER2+, and 26 triple +. Outcomes were analyzed across the various bio-subtypes for all the pts (APBI + WBI), APBI alone and WBI alone. The endpoints assessed were local recurrence (LR), true recurrence/marginal miss (TR/MM), elsewhere failure (EF), regional recurrence (RR), distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), and contralateral breast failure (CLBF). Results: Mean age was 66 (32-94) with a mean FU of 5.2 years (0.1-18.3). Regarding systemic therapy, 75% received endocrine Rx, while chemotherapy was documented in 21%. For all pts (APBI+WBI) there was no significant difference across the various bio-subtypes with respect to 5, 10 and 15 yr actuarial LR, TR/MM, EF, RR, DM, DFS and CLBF. Likewise, for the 386 APBI-alone treated pts, no significant difference was found between the various bio-subtypes for all the same endpoints reported. However, for the 386 WBI pts, a significant difference was seen in the 15-year actuarial LR between luminal A and TNBC (1.5% vs 7.4%, p = 0.007). Significance was also found in the 15-year actuarial DFS between luminal A/B and TNBC (98.0%, 95.2%; 86.0%, respectively, p = 0.009). Conclusions: In comparing partial to whole breast RT across the various biological subtypes of breast CA, APBI is at least as effective as WBI. However, the retrospective nature of this study along with the limited numbers of pts in the HER2+ and triple + subsets are weaknesses which are acknowledged to exist in this dataset. The addition of further pts in all the biological subtypes, particularly the HER2+ and triple + subsets, along with results from randomized trials incorporating biomarker data will be needed to substantiate these findings.