Search

Background Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are important precursors of colorectal carcinoma and interval cancer. Large SSPs (≥ 20 mm) outside the definition of serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) have not been studied in comparison with SPS. We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with large SSPs in this context. Methods Patients with at least one SSP (≥ 20 mm) were eligible. Data from three consecutive colonoscopies were used to compare clinical and endoscopic characteristics in three patient groups: SPS, a solitary large SSP, and patients with at least two SSPs without fulfilling the criteria for SPS (oligo-SSP). Data on the diagnostic colonoscopy were collected retrospectively, whereas the remaining data was collected prospectively. Results 67/146 patients (45.9 %) had SPS, 53/146 (36.3 %) had a solitary SSP, and 26/146 (17.8 %) were categorized as oligo-SSP. Personal (16.4 %, 9.4 %, and 11.5 %, respectively) and family (17.9 %, 17.0 %, and 23.1 %, respectively) history of colorectal carcinoma did not differ significantly between groups. Polyp burden was greater in SPS compared with solitary SSP but was not different from oligo-SSP (advanced adenomas: SPS 32.8 % vs. solitary SSP 9.4 % [P = 0.002] vs. oligo-SSP 34.6 % [P = 0.87]; ≥ 10 conventional adenomas: 11.9 % vs. 0 % [P = 0.01] vs. 3.8 % [P = 0.44], respectively). Dysplasia in large SSPs was frequent in all groups (41.1 % overall). SPS was recognized by referring endoscopists in only 9.0 % of cases. Conclusion Patients with oligo-SSPs have similar synchronous polyp burden and clinical characteristics as patients with SPS and may require similar surveillance. Modification of the criteria for the diagnosis of SPS to include this group seems warranted. Patients with a solitary SSP have a lower risk of synchronous polyps, including advanced adenomas. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether these patients may return to standard surveillance following complete examination and clearance of the colon.

Background and aims: Complete endoscopic resection (CER) of short-segment Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EEA) is a precise staging tool and achieves durable disease control. The major drawback is development of post-endoscopic resection esophageal stricture (PERES). No effective therapy to prevent PERES has been described. Viscous budesonide slurry (VBS) may have a role in the prevention of PERES by suppressing the post-CER inflammatory process. The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of VBS for the prevention of PERES. Methods: Prospective data were collected on patients referred for CER of HGD or EEA. After January 2012, patients routinely received VBS (two 0.5-mg/2-mL budesonide respules mixed with sucralose) twice daily for 6 weeks following each stage of the CER schedule. All patients received high dose proton pump inhibitor therapy for the duration of CER and the following 3 months. Patients had no other intervention to prevent PERES. A validated dysphagia score was used (0 – 4, no dysphagia to aphagia). Endoscopic dilation was performed for dysphagia. Patients receiving VBS were compared with historical controls. The primary endpoint was the need for dilation. Results: Between January 2008 and January 2015, 104 of 116 eligible patients completed CER. The VBS group (n = 29) and non-VBS group (n = 75) had similar patient, disease, and procedural characteristics. Dilations were needed in 13.8 % vs. 37.3 % (P = 0.03), with a median of one vs. two procedures (P = 0.01), and median dysphagia score during CER of 0 vs. 1 (P = 0.02) in the VBS and non-VBS groups, respectively. No VBS-related adverse events were noted. Conclusion: In this pilot study VBS significantly reduced PERES and shortened the dilation program after CER.

Background Real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps may lead to substantial time and cost savings and could potentially reduce complications associated with polypectomy. We prospectively assessed the utility of a novel narrow-band imaging (NBI) system with dual focus magnification (DF) in differentiating colorectal polyps in consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. Patients and Methods All procedures were carried out with a prototype 190 series Exera III NBI system with Dual Focus capability. Histology of each polyp was predicted in real time with NBI-DF based on the modified Sano's classification with a confidence level (low/high). NBI-DF diagnosis was then compared to the final (blinded) histopathology results. Primary endpoint was the accuracy of endoscopic prediction with the modified Sano's classification of all polyps when they were diagnosed with high confidence. Secondary endpoints were the accuracy of post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for diminutive polyps(≤5 mm). A total of 164 polyps in 87 patients (53 males) with a mean age of 63 (range 28–86) years were evaluated. Results 149 polyps were diagnosed with high confidence on endoscopic prediction, out of which 80 were diminutive, 31 small (6–9 mm) and 38 large (>10 mm). Overall accuracy of NBI-DF compared to final histopathology was 97%. The accuracy for post-polypectomy surveillance interval based on the endoscopic prediction was 97%. The NPV for diminutive rectosigmoid polyps for adenomatous histology was 100%. Conclusion In this preliminary feasibility study, NBI-DF permitted prediction of histology of colorectal polyps with high accuracy. In addition, both of the secondary endpoints exceeded the ASGE PIVI thresholds for the management of diminutive polyps.

Background and Aim Diminutive polyps measuring ≤ 5 mm in size constitute 80% of polyps in the colon. We prospectively assessed the performance of high-definition white light endoscopy (hWLE) and narrow band imaging (NBI) in differentiating diminutive colorectal polyps. Methods In this prospective, multicenter study, videos of 50 diminutive polyps (31 hyperplastic, 19 adenomatous) in hWLE followed by NBI (total 100 videos) were initially obtained and placed in random order into five separate folders (each folder 20 videos). Eight endoscopists were then invited to predict the histology (each endoscopist 100 videos, 800 video assessments in all). Polyps were classified into types 1–3 (hyperplastic) and type 4 (adenoma). Feedback on individual performance was given after each folder (20 videos) was assessed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in differentiating hyperplastic from adenomatous polyps by hWLE (400 videos) and NBI (400 videos) were 67.8%, 90.7%, 81.7%, 82.1%, and 82.0%; and 82.2%, 81.5%, 73.1%, 88.2%, and 81.8%, respectively. In the pretest and post-test analysis, the accuracy with NBI improved markedly from 68.8% to 91.3% (P = 0.001) compared with hWLE, 76.3–78.8% (P = 0.850). Overall, the interobserver agreement was 0.46 for hWLE (moderate) and 0.64 for NBI (good). Conclusions NBI was as accurate as hWLE in differentiating diminutive colorectal polyps. Once a learning curve was reached, NBI achieved significantly higher accuracies with good interobserver agreement. Using a simplified classification, a didactic learning session and feedback on performance, diminutive colorectal polyps could be predicted with high accuracies with NBI.

The 2012 Digestive Disease Week (DDW; 19 – 22 May, San Diego, California, USA) received a record number of submissions on colonoscopy and colorectal cancer (CRC). Scientific presentations focused primarily on colonic polyps and can be broadly divided into polyp detection, characterization, and resection. Among the more interesting topics were the novel concept of polypectomy rate, newer-generation optical imaging technology, and advanced endoscopic resection techniques.

Objective: The advent and utility of new endoscopic imaging modalities for predicting the histology of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in real time with high accuracy appear promising and could potentially obviate the need to perform random biopsies where guidelines are poorly adhered to. We embarked on evaluating the performance characteristics of white-light endoscopy with magnification (WLE-z), narrow-band imaging with magnification (NBI-z) and a combination of both modalities. Design: This was a prospective online study with 28 endoscopists from 11 countries (Asia-Pacific region) participating as assessors. In total, 35 patients with BE were assessed using 150 slides from WLE-z and NBI-z randomly arranged using a simple classification with corresponding histology. The overall Accuracy (Acc), Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of WLE-z, NBI-z and a combination of both were calculated. Results: The overall Acc for WLE-z and NBI-z images was 87.1 % and 88.7 %, respectively. When images from the two modalities were placed side by side, the Acc increased to 90.3 %. The Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV of WLE-z were 48 %, 92 %, 45 %, and 93 % while with NBI-z, these improved to 89 %, 89 %, 56 %, and 98 %, respectively. When both imaging modalities were viewed together, they improved further to 93 %, 90 %, 61 %, and 99 %. Conclusion: The high NPV (99 %) when both WLE-z and NBI-z were used simultaneously indicates that areas with regular appearance that are diagnosed with confidence can effectively be left alone and not biopsied when performed at a skilled resourced center. This approach could potentially lead to a paradigm shift of how patients with BE are assessed.

Background and Aims Complete endoscopic resection (CER) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EEA) is a comprehensive and precise staging tool and may produce a sustained treatment response, preventing metachronous disease. There are limited data on long-term clinical outcomes and the sustainability of dysplasia eradication after CER. We aimed to describe long-term outcomes of a primary CER strategy of BE with HGD/EEA. Methods Patients with biopsy-proven HGD and EEA in short-segment BE (≤3 cm in circumferential length and ≤5 cm in maximal length) underwent staged CER by multiband mucosectomy or the cap method. The primary endpoint was remission of HGD or EEA (complete resection of HGD/EEA), dysplasia (complete resection of any dysplasia), and complete resection of intestinal metaplasia. Results Of 153 patients (126 HGD, 27 EEA; 83.7% male, median age of 66 years) considered suitable for CER, 138 met all inclusion criteria. CER was technically successful in all patients and was established after a median of 2 sessions. Covert synchronous EEA was found in 1 patient. At a mean follow-up of 40.7 months by intention-to-treat analysis, complete remission of HGD/EEA, dysplasia, and intestinal metaplasia was achieved in 98.5%, 89.1%, and 71.0%, respectively. In 47.1% of patients, CER changed the histological grade compared with pretreatment biopsies (28.1% downstaged and 19.0% upstaged). Esophageal dilation was performed in 36.8% in a mean of 2.5 sessions. At the end of follow-up, 96.4% of patients had no or minimal dysphagia and 90.6% of patients found CER an acceptable treatment. Conclusions On long-term follow-up, a primary CER strategy was a highly effective, safe, and durable treatment for HGD and EEA. Despite the need for post-CER dilation in one-third of patients, the majority found it an acceptable treatment on long-term follow-up.

Early screening for gastrointestinal cancers may enable detection of anomalies at very early stages before neoplasia permeates into the deeper submucosal layer and beyond. All detected lesions should be studied further to gain valuable information. While most newer electronic image enhancing modalities perform no better than white light endoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasia, there are many options available for assistance in defining the microvascular architecture of colorectal polyps. Advanced endoscopic imaging and a step-by-step methodological approach can often aid in the characterization of colorectal polyps before a decision is made to proceed with endoscopic resection.

Real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps may lead to substantial time and cost savings and could potentially reduce complications associated with polypectomy. We prospectively assessed the utility of a novel narrow-band imaging (NBI) system with dual focus magnification (DF) in differentiating colorectal polyps in consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy.All procedures were carried out with a prototype 190 series Exera III NBI system with Dual Focus capability. Histology of each polyp was predicted in real time with NBI-DF based on the modified Sano's classification with a confidence level (low/high). NBI-DF diagnosis was then compared to the final (blinded) histopathology results. Primary endpoint was the accuracy of endoscopic prediction with the modified Sano's classification of all polyps when they were diagnosed with high confidence. Secondary endpoints were the accuracy of post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for diminutive polyps(≤ 5 mm). A total of 164 polyps in 87 patients (53 males) with a mean age of 63 (range 28-86) years were evaluated.149 polyps were diagnosed with high confidence on endoscopic prediction, out of which 80 were diminutive, 31 small (6-9 mm) and 38 large (10 mm). Overall accuracy of NBI-DF compared to final histopathology was 97%. The accuracy for post-polypectomy surveillance interval based on the endoscopic prediction was 97%. The NPV for diminutive rectosigmoid polyps for adenomatous histology was 100%.In this preliminary feasibility study, NBI-DF permitted prediction of histology of colorectal polyps with high accuracy. In addition, both of the secondary endpoints exceeded the ASGE PIVI thresholds for the management of diminutive polyps.

Diminutive polyps measuring ≤ 5 mm in size constitute 80% of polyps in the colon. We prospectively assessed the performance of high-definition white light endoscopy (hWLE) and narrow band imaging (NBI) in differentiating diminutive colorectal polyps.In this prospective, multicenter study, videos of 50 diminutive polyps (31 hyperplastic, 19 adenomatous) in hWLE followed by NBI (total 100 videos) were initially obtained and placed in random order into five separate folders (each folder 20 videos). Eight endoscopists were then invited to predict the histology (each endoscopist 100 videos, 800 video assessments in all). Polyps were classified into types 1-3 (hyperplastic) and type 4 (adenoma). Feedback on individual performance was given after each folder (20 videos) was assessed.The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in differentiating hyperplastic from adenomatous polyps by hWLE (400 videos) and NBI (400 videos) were 67.8%, 90.7%, 81.7%, 82.1%, and 82.0%; and 82.2%, 81.5%, 73.1%, 88.2%, and 81.8%, respectively. In the pretest and post-test analysis, the accuracy with NBI improved markedly from 68.8% to 91.3% (P = 0.001) compared with hWLE, 76.3-78.8% (P = 0.850). Overall, the interobserver agreement was 0.46 for hWLE (moderate) and 0.64 for NBI (good).NBI was as accurate as hWLE in differentiating diminutive colorectal polyps. Once a learning curve was reached, NBI achieved significantly higher accuracies with good interobserver agreement. Using a simplified classification, a didactic learning session and feedback on performance, diminutive colorectal polyps could be predicted with high accuracies with NBI.

Large laterally spreading lesions (LSL) in the colon and rectum can be safely and effectively removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, many patients still undergo surgery. Endoscopic treatment may be more cost effective. We compared the costs of endoscopic versus surgical management of large LSL.We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study of consecutive patients referred to 1 of 7 academic hospitals in Australia for the management of large LSL (≥ 20 mm) from January 2010 to December 2013. We collected data on numbers of patients undergoing EMR, actual endoscopic management costs (index colonoscopy, hospital stay, adverse events, and first surveillance colonoscopy), characteristics of patients and lesions, outcomes, and adverse events, and findings from follow-up examinations 14 days, 4-6 months, and 16-18 months after treatment. We compared data from patients who underwent EMR with those from a model in which all patients underwent surgery without any complications. Event-specific costs, based on Australian refined diagnosis-related group codes, were used to estimate average cost per patient.EMR was performed on 1489 lesions (mean size, 36 mm) in 1353 patients (mean age, 67 years; 52.1% male). Total costs involved in the endoscopic management of large LSL were US $6,316,593 and total inpatient hospitalization length of stay was 1180 days. The total cost predicted for the surgical management group was US $16,601,502, with a total inpatient hospitalization length of stay of 4986 days. Endoscopic management produced a potential total cost saving of US $10,284,909; the mean cost difference per patient was US $7602 (95% confidence interval, $8458-$9220; P.001). Inpatient hospitalization length of stay was reduced by 2.81 nights per patient (95% confidence interval, 2.69-2.94; P.001).In a large multicenter study, endoscopic management of large LSL by EMR was significantly more cost-effective than surgery. Endoscopic management by EMR at an appropriately experienced and resourced tertiary center should be considered the first line of therapy for most patients with this disorder. This approach is likely to deliver substantial overall health expenditure savings. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01368289.

s e t w y c w i i i m t s The 2012 Digestive Disease Week (DDW; 19-22 May, San Diego, California, USA) received a record number of submissions on colonoscopy and colorectal cancer (CRC). Scientific presentations focused primarily on colonic polyps and can be broadly divided into polyp detection, characterization, and resection. Among the more interesting topics were the novel concept of polypectomy rate, newer-generation optical imaging technology, and advanced endoscopic resection techniques.

Preliminary Feasibility Study Using a Novel Narrow Band Imaging System With Dual Focus Magnification Capability in Differentiating Colorectal Polyps Rajvinder Singh*, William Tam, Mahesh Jayanna, Nazree Nordeen Gastroenterology, Division of Medicine, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia Introduction: Advances in endoscopic imaging with real time diagnosis of colorectal polyps may lead to substantial time and cost savings and could potentially reduce complications associated with polypectomy and endoscopic resection. We prospectively assessed the utility of a novel Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) system with dual focus magnification (DF) in differentiating colorectal polyps. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing a colonoscopy for any indication were invited to participate. All procedures were performed with a prototype 190 series Exera III NBI system (Olympus Co. Ltd, Japan) with DF capability. The NBI image has been brightened by 150% and the DF function enables magnification of upto 70X. Both are push button techniques and image enhancement with magnification occurs within 1-2 seconds. Histology of each polyp which was detected was predicted in real time with NBI-DF based on the modified Sano’s capillary network (cn) pattern; Type I: absent cn (hyperplastic polyp), Type II: cn present, surrounding mucosal glands (adenoma), Type IIIa: high density cn with turtousity and lack of uniformity (high grade dysplasia/ intramucosal cancer) and Type IIIb: nearly avascular cn (invasive cancer). This was followed by polypectomy, endoscopic or surgical resection. NBI-DF diagnosis was then compared to the final (blinded) histopathology results. The primary end point was the Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of neoplastic (Sano’s II, IIIa & IIIb) vs. non neoplastic polyps (Sano’s I). In addition, we also assessed a novel concept of ’endoscopic resectability’ of these polyps (Sano’s II/ IIIa vs. Sano’s I, IIIb). Results: A total of 44 polyps [mean size (range): 8.1 (3-40) mm] in 25 patients (17 males), with a mean age (range): 65.9 (43-83) years] have been evaluated to date. Twenty six polyps were located in the left colon (spleenic flexure and beyond) and 18 in the right. According to the Paris classification, 33 polyps were type Is, 6 Ip, 3 IIa and 2 IIa c. The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in differentiating neoplastic from non neoplastic polyps was 97%, 91%, 97% and 91% respectively. The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in differentiating endoscopic resectability was 97%, 91%, 97% and 91% respectively. Conclusion: In this preliminary feasibility study, NBI-DF permitted prediction of histology of colorectal polyps with high Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV. This approach may allow prompt decisions to be made if a polyp should be left in situ (Sano’s I), endoscopically resected (Sano’s II/IIIa) or biopsied and sent for further surgical intervention (Sano’s IIIb).