1. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Multienzyme Complex in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
- Author
-
Sivakumar Arumugam, Mahesh Paschapur, Shaheen Majeed, Anurag Pande, Muhammed Majeed, Furqan Ali, and Kalyanam Nagabhushanam
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Placebo-controlled study ,Enzyme Therapy ,India ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Double blind ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Internal medicine ,dyspeptic symptoms ,medicine ,Humans ,multienzyme complex ,In patient ,Dyspepsia ,Aged ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,functional dyspepsia ,Pathophysiology ,Enzymes ,safety and efficacy ,nonulcer dyspepsia ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,digestive enzymes ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Full Communications ,business - Abstract
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a highly prevalent disorder having nonspecific symptoms and varied pathophysiology. Its treatment remains a challenge as therapeutic options are limited, unsatisfactory, and elusive. Thus, safety and efficacy of DigeZyme®, a proprietary multienzyme complex (MEC), was evaluated as a dietary supplement in FD patients. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 40 patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either MEC (50 mg, TID; n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) for 60 days. Reports of adverse or serious adverse events (AEs), abnormal results of vital signs, abnormal findings during physical examination, and abnormal laboratory investigations were monitored closely. Efficacy measures were change in Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ), Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Short Form (NDI-SF), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Clinical Global Impression Severity Rating Scale (CGI-S), and Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS) at baseline and follow-up visits on day 15, 30, and 60. Supplementation with MEC was associated with statistically significant differences (P value ranging from .0401 to .0033) in all efficacy parameters compared with placebo. The between-group comparison also revealed that MEC supplement had a significantly greater effect (P
- Published
- 2018