Search

Introduction: Cladribine was approved for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in our country in 2018. A previous study by our group showed that its use among high efficacy therapies options has been increasing along the years., Objective: to analyze the cladribine use trend across time since its approval., Method: A retrospective cohort study was performed. People with MS (pwMS) treated with cladribine were included. Two periods were defined: P1 = 2018 - 2020 and P2 = 2021 - 2023. A comparative analysis was carry out between P1 and P2 to assess the trend of use, clinical/demographic characteristics, and effectiveness., Results: One hundred ninety- seven people with MS (pwMS) were included, mean EDSS: 2.2 ± 3.08, 72.6% female, mean age: 35.2 ± 9 years, mean disease duration: 6.6 ± 5.6 years, mean time lapse under cladribine: 26.1 ± 12.4 months. Regarding patient profile, we found significant differences between P1 and P2 in the MS evolution (p = 0.001) and EDSS ( p = 0.018) prior to initiation of cladribine. In the individualized analysis by year, we found a decrease in relapse number in the year prior to starting cladribine (p = 0.02). A higher proportion of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) was found in patients treated at P2 compared to those treated at P1 (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: An earlier use of cladribine achieved a significant increase in reaching NEDA. This learning curve in the use of cladribine allows a better identification of the candidate patient and influences the treatment effectiveness., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the institutions involved. Competing interests None of the authors present conflicts of interest in relation to this research., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background: We assessed the effectiveness, safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in real-world clinical practice in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) from Argentina., Methods: We conducted a multicenter ambispective cohort study in Argentina between September 2020 and March 2023. Changes in annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), PROs (depression, anxiety, fatigue, burden of treatment and quality of life), and safety data were collected at clinical visits performed every 6 months for at least 24 months., Results: We included 161 PwMS (64% female). DMF treatment was associated with a significant reduction in ARR from baseline after 24 months of treatment (from 0.87 to 0.23, p < 0.001). Disability progression was observed in 27.9% vs. 9.3% pre- and post-DMF, and disability improvement was found in 13% of patients from baseline to month 24. MRI activity was significantly reduced compared with baseline. Fatigue, depression, and quality of life scores were significantly improved from baseline to 24 months. Flushing was the most frequent adverse event reported in 19.2%. No significant reduction was observed in the hospitalization rate pre- and post-DMF (19.8% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.32). During follow-up, 135 (83%) patients were relapse-free, 110 (68.3%) were MRI free activity (Gad + lesion) and 108 (67%) reached NEDA., Conclusions: DMF significantly reduced disease activity in PwMS from Argentina with a good safety profile in real-world settings. A significant impact on the quality of life during follow-up was found., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the ethics committee of each participating center. Informed consent A written or verbal informed consent for the use of the anonymized data for research objectives was obtained from all participants before data collection. Conflict of interest Edgar Carnero Contentti has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., Merck, Roche, Novartis, Raffo, Amgen, TEVA, Biogen, Genzyme Corp, Biosidus, AstraZeneca, LACTRIMS, Harvard Medical School (Postgraduate Medical Education), The Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation and The Sumaira Foundation. Ricardo Alonso has received reimbursement for research grants and travel stipends from Merck, Biogen and Genzyme. Marcos Burgos has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, consultations fees, clinical trials fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Tuteur. Liliana Patrucco has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultations fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Darío Tavolini has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultations fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Edgardo Cristiano has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations and travel/accommodations stipends from Merck-Serono Argentina, Biogen-Idec Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Bayer Inc., Novartis Argentina and TEVA-Tuteur Argentina. Juan I. Rojas has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultations fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and MSIF. Berenice Silva has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Pablo Lopez has received reimbursement for research grants and travel stipends from Merck, Biogen and Genzyme. Verónica Tkachuk has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, consultations fees, clinical trials fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Tuteur. Carolina Mainella has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultations fees and travel stipends from Biogen and Merck. Geraldine Luetic has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultations fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Emanuel Silva, Felisa Leguizamon, Santiago Tizio, Marina Alonso Serena has nothing disclose., (© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Background and Purpose: The diagnostic criteria for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-IgG)-associated disease (MOGAD) were published in 2023. We aimed to determine the performance of the new criteria in Latin American (LATAM) patients compared with the 2018 criteria and explore the significance of MOG-IgG titers in diagnosis., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of LATAM (Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia) adult patients with one clinical MOGAD event and MOG-IgG positivity confirmed by cell-based assay. Both 2018 and 2023 MOGAD criteria were applied, calculating diagnostic performance indicators., Results: Among 171 patients (predominantly females, mean age at first attack = 34.1 years, mean disease duration = 4.5 years), 98.2% patients met the 2018 criteria, and of those who did not fulfill diagnostic criteria (n = 3), all tested positive for MOG-IgG (one low-positive and two without reported titer). Additionally, 144 (84.2%) patients met the 2023 criteria, of whom 57 (39.5%) had MOG-IgG+ titer information (19 clearly positive and 38 low-positive), whereas 87 (60.5%) patients had no MOG-IgG titer. All 144 patients met diagnostic supporting criteria. The remaining 27 patients did not meet the 2023 MOGAD criteria due to low MOG-IgG (n = 12) or lack of titer antibody access (n = 15), associated with the absence of supporting criteria. The 2023 MOGAD criteria showed a sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.91) and specificity of 100% compared to the 2018 criteria., Conclusions: These findings support the diagnostic utility of the 2023 MOGAD criteria in an LATAM cohort in real-world practice, despite limited access to MOG-IgG titration., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances., Objective: To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG)., Method: A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01)., Conclusion: The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immunosuppressive therapies as azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are widely prescribed as first-line treatment to prevent relapses in NMOSD. However, the rate of response to these traditional therapies is unknown in Argentina. We aimed to describe and compare treatment failure rates in NMOSD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in NMOSD patients included in RelevarEM (a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS and NMOSD in Argentina). NMOSD patients were defined based on validate diagnostic criteria. Only NMOSD patients who received AZA or MMF for at least 6 months or RTX for at least 1 month were included. Patients who were receiving AZA, MMF, or RTX and then switched to another 1 of these 3 therapies were included if the above-mentioned criteria for each drug were fulfilled. Data on patient demographics, clinical, neuroradiological findings, and treatments administered were collected. Treatment failure was defined as any new attack/relapse that occurred despite immunosuppressive treatment., Results: We included 139 NMOSD patients who were receiving AZA (n = 105), MMF (n = 5) or RTX (n = 29) with a mean follow-up time of 41.3 ± 11.4 months and median of EDSS at treatment initiation of 3. We observed a reduction in the annualized relapse rate from pre-treatment to post-treatment of 51.1 %, 48.4 %, and 79.1 % respectively with a Hazard Risk relative to RTX (95 % CI) of 1.67 (1.34-3.54, p = 0.01) for AZA and 2.01 (1.86-4.43, p = 0.008) for MMF. AZA, MMF and RTX failure was observed in 45/105 (42.8 %), 2/5 (40 %) and 3/29 (10.3 %) patients, respectively., Conclusions: Treatment failure rates were higher for AZA and MMF than RTX in Argentinean NMOSD patients in a real-world setting. High-efficacy treatment increases the opportunity to prevent attacks of NMOSD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to assess the treatment strategies utilized in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) experiencing relapses, including their frequency, types, and response after 6 months based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving NMOSD patients from the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177). Treatment response at 6 months was categorized as "good" if the EDSS score decreased by ≥1 point after a nadir EDSS score ≤ 3, or by ≥2 points after a nadir EDSS score > 3, "poor" if the EDSS score decrease was slighter, and as "absent" if the EDSS score remained unchanged or worsened., Results: We included 120 NMOSD patients (seropositive N = 75), who experienced 250 NMOSD-related relapses and received 248 treatments. At 6 months, complete recovery was achieved in 70/98 (71.4%) and 15/19 (79%) patients, respectively. Predictors of a "good" response in our regression model were a younger age at disease onset (OR:3.54, CI95% 2.45-5.01, p < 0.0001) and a short delay from onset of relapse to treatment initiation (OR:1.56, CI95% 1.22-2.13, p = 0.004)., Conclusions: Approximately two-thirds of patients experienced complete recovery, and younger age and a short delay to start treatment were independent predictors of a "good" response., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared no potential conflict of interest with respect to this research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We aimed to assess the frequency, duration, and severity of area postrema syndrome (APS) during follow-up in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients, as well as its association with inflammatory activity and prognostic factors of APS severity in a real-world setting., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of Latin American (LATAM) NMOSD patients who had experienced APS during their follow-up. Patients from Mexico, Peru, Brazil, Colombia, Panama, Chile and Argentina patients who met 2015 NMOSD criteria were included. We evaluated data on symptom type (nausea, vomiting and/or hiccups), frequency, duration, severity (measured by APS severity scale), association with other NMOSD core relapses, and acute treatments (symptomatic and immunotherapy or plasmapheresis). Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate factors associated with APS severity (vs. mild-moderate)., Results: Out of 631 NMOSD patients, 116 (18.3%) developed APS during their follow-up. The most common APS phenotype was severe. Inflammatory activity (i.e., relapses) significantly decreased after the onset of APS. Half of the patients experienced isolated APS with a median duration of 10 days, and the most frequently used acute treatment was IV steroids. All three symptoms were present in 44.6% of the patients. APS symptoms resolved following immunotherapy. Logistic regression did not identify independent factors associated with the severity of APS., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 18.3% of NMOSD patients developed APS during the follow-up period, with most patients fulfilling criteria for severe APS. The inflammatory activity decreased after the onset of APS compared to the previous year., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Knowledge of the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in older patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) is limited due to their exclusion from clinical trials. Our purpose is to evaluate the choice of DMTs in pwMS older than 50 years old in a real-world setting., Methods: Cross-sectional study of pwMS from the Argentine MS and NMOSD Registry. We included patients under 35 and above 50 years old prescribed DMTs. Disease activity was categorized as highly active (HA) or not highly active (NHA), and DMTs were classified as low efficacy therapies (LET) or high efficacy therapies (HET)., Results: 1460 patients (65% females) were enrolled. The HA group comprised 241 patients, 198 young (82.2%) and 43 older (17.8%). The NHA group included 1219 patients, 893 young (73%) and 326 older (27%). In the NHA group, older patients received LET more frequently than younger patients (66% versus 44%; p < 0.01). In the HA group, older patients received LET in 61% of cases, whereas younger patients received HET in 71% (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: The study shows the preference of LET in older patients regardless of disease activity. However it does not demonstrate a difference in disability in older patients based on low vs high efficacy DMTs used, probably due to the design of the study. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to address this issue., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is characterized by gradual neurological deterioration without relapses. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of gender and age at disease onset on disease progression and disability accumulation in patients with this disease phenotype., Methods: Secondary data from the RelevarEM registry, a longitudinal database in Argentina, were analyzed. The cohort comprised patients with PPMS who met inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis with multilevel Bayesian robust regression modeling was conducted to assess the associations between gender, age at onset, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score trajectories., Results: We identified 125 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PPMS encompassing a total of 464 observations. We found no significant differences in EDSS scores after 10 years of disease progression between genders (-0.08; credible interval (CI): -0.60, 0.42). A 20-year difference in age at onset did not show significant differences in EDSS score after 10 years of disease progression (0.281; CI: -0.251, 0.814). Finally, we also did not find any clinically relevant difference between gender EDSS score with a difference of 20 years in age at onset (-0.021; CI: -0.371, 0.319)., Conclusion: Biological plausibility of gender and age effects does not correlate with clinical impact measured by EDSS score., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be classified according to the efficacy in which they prevent inflammatory activity. To date, there are limited data regarding the use of high-efficacy treatments (HETs) in Latin America (LATAM). We aimed to analyze the use of HETs in Argentina, focusing on the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the patients who use these treatments and the changes in the trend of use over the years., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done using the Argentina MS patient registry, RelevarEM. Patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) according to validated diagnostic criteria and under treatment with natalizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, rituximab or ocrelizumab were included., Results: Out of 2450 RRMS patients under a DMT, 462 (19%) were on HETs. One third of those patients (35%) received HETs as the first treatment. The most frequent reason for switching to HETs was treatment failure to previous DMT (77%). The time from MS diagnosis to the first HET in treatment-naive patients was less than one year (IQR: 0-1 year) and in treatment-experienced patients it was 5 years (IQR: 3-9 years). Between 2015 and 2017 (P1), 729 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 85 (11.65%) were HETs. Between 2018 and 2020 (P2), 961 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 284 (29.55%) were HETs. When comparing P2 with P1, a significant increase in the use of HETs was observed (p < 0.01). The most frequently used HETs were alemtuzumab (50.59%) in P1, and cladribine (45.20%) in P2., Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients under HET in Argentina were identified. Based on a real-world setting, we found a significant trend towards and a rapid increase in the use of HETs in clinical practice in patients with RRMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Irrestrictive research grants from Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, and Roche Argentina allowed the development and implementation of the RELEVAREM Registry. Those grants did not interfere in the development plan, variables, PI selection, patient information nor other aspects of the Registry. Authors declare no conflict of interest with the research done., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

We aimed to evaluate mortality and causes of death among Argentinean neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and identify predictors of death. Retrospective study included 158 NMOSD patients and 11 (7%) patients died after 11 years of follow-up for a total exposure time of 53,345 days with an overall incidence density of 2.06 × 10.000 patients/day (95% CI 1.75-2.68). Extensive cervical myelitis with respiratory failure (45%) was the most frequent cause of death. Older age (HR = 2.05, p  = 0.002) and higher disability score (HR = 2.30, p  < 0.001) at disease onset were independent predictors of death. We found an 11-year mortality rate of 7% in Argentinean NMOSD patients., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background: We aimed to determine the proportion of highly active multiple sclerosis patients under high-efficacy therapies (HETs) achieve no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) at 1 and 2 years, and to identify factors associated with failing to meet no evidence of disease activity 3 at 2 years., Methods: This retrospective cohort study based on Argentina Multiple Sclerosis patient registry (RelevarEM), includes highly active multiple sclerosis patients who received HETs., Results: In total, 254 (78.51%) achieved NEDA-3 at year 1 and 220 (68.12%) achieved NEDA-3 at year 2. Patients who achieved NEDA-3 at 2 years had a shorter duration of multiple sclerosis ( p  < 0.01) and a shorter time between first treatment and current treatment ( p  = 0.01). Early high-efficacy strategy patients reached NEDA-3 more frequently ( p  < 0.01). Being a naïve patient (odds ratio: 3.78, 95% confidence interval 1.50-9.86, p  < 0.01) was an independent predictor to reach NEDA-3 at 2 years. No association was found between type of HETs and NEDA-3 at 2 years when adjusted for potential confounders (odds ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval 0.51-6.06, p 0.57)., Conclusion: We found a high proportion of patients who achieved NEDA-3 at 1 and 2 years. Early high-efficacy strategy patients had a higher probability of achieving NEDA-3 at 2 years., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background: The use of telemedicine has quickly increased during of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given that unmet needs and barriers to multiple sclerosis (MS) care have been reported, telemedicine has become an interesting option to the care of these patients. The objective of these consensus recommendations was to elaborate a guideline for the management of people with MS using telemedicine in order to contribute to an effective and high-quality healthcare., Methods: A panel of Argentinean neurologist's experts in neuroimmunological diseases and dedicated to the diagnosis, management,and care of MS patients gathered virtually during 2021 and 2022 to conduct a consensus recommendation on the use of telemedicine in clinical practice in adult people with MS. To reach consensus, the methodology of "formal consensus RAND/UCLA Appropriateness method" was used., Results: Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion focusing on definitions, general characteristics and ethical standards, diagnosis of MS, follow-up (evaluation of disability and relapses of MS), identification and treatment of relapses, and finally disease-modifying treatments using telemedicine., Conclusion: The recommendations of this consensus would provide a useful guide for the proper use of telemedicine for the assessment, follow-up, management, and treatment of people with MS. We suggest the use of these guidelines to all the Argentine neurologists committed to the care of people with MS., (© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but severe neuroimmunological condition associated with a significant financial burden. NMOSD is also associated with increased health care utilization, including neurology outpatient visits, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use, long-term medication, among others. We aimed to evaluate real-world patient experiences in access to care and NMOSD burden in an Argentinean cohort., Methods: This cross-sectional study used a self-administered survey and was conducted in Argentina (2022). Patients with NMOSD were divided into three groups: private health insurance (PHI), social health insurance (SHI), and public health insurance (PHI, Ministry of Public Health). Differences in access and health care barriers were assessed., Results: One hundred patients with NMOSD (74 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 38.7 years were included. Their EDSS was 2.8 and they were followed for 5.2 years. Of them, 51%, 11%, and 13% were employed (full-time: 57.5%), currently unemployed and retired by NMOSD, respectively. 55% of them visited between 2-3 specialists before NMOSD diagnosis. Aquaporin-4-antibody and/or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody testing was requested in 91% (health insurance covered this partially in 15.3% and 32.9% of the time the test was entirely paid by patient/family). Patients with NMOSD receiving private medical care reported greater access to MRI, outpatient visits, and fewer issues to obtain NMOSD medications compared to those treated at public institutions. A longer mean time to MRI and neurology visit was found in the PHI group when compared with the other two subgroups. Regression analysis showed that private insurance (OR=3.84, p=0.01) was the only independent factor associated with appropriate access to NMOSD medications in Argentina., Conclusion: These findings suggest that barriers to access and utilization of NMOSD care services in Argentina are common. NMOSD patients experienced problems to receive NMOSD medication properly, especially those from the public sector., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest relating to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Shared decision making is a way of incorporating patients' preferences and values into the decisions regarding the treatment and follow-up plan for the condition that affects them. It is currently applied mainly in the context of chronic disorders for which there is no cure available but nevertheless many therapeutic alternatives, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Current views and opinions on shared decision making for the treatment of MS are discussed in this consensus based on a modified Delphi method that included a group of neurologists from Argentina. A set of statements was defined by the experts and seeks to serve as a guide to apply this concept in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Medical writing support was provided by Biogen. S. Batagelj is an employee of Biogen. All other authors have no conflict of interests to report. The authors were not paid for their work developing the manuscript. Views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are solely those of the authors., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The objective was to evaluate time to reach an EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 in NMOSD and MOGAD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT 03,375,177)., Methods: NMOSD patients diagnosed according to 2015 criteria and with MOGAD were identified. Patients with at least 3 years of follow-up and periodic clinical evaluations with EDSS outcomes were included. AQP4-antibody and MOG-antibody status was recorded, and patients were stratified as seropositive and seronegative for AQP4-antibody. EDSS of 4, 6, and 7 were defined as dependent variables. Log rank test was used to identify differences between groups., Results: Registry data was provided for a total of 137 patients. Of these, seventy-five presented AQP4-ab-positive NMOSD, 45 AQP4-ab-negative NMOSD, and 11 MOGAD. AQP4-ab status was determined by cell-based assay (CBA) in 72% of NMOSD patients. MOG-ab status was tested by CBA in all cases. Mean time to EDSS of 4 was 53.6 ± 24.5 vs. 63.1 ± 32.2 vs. 44.7 ± 32 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD, respectively (p = 0.76). Mean time to EDSS of 6 was 79.2 ± 44.3 vs. 75.7 ± 48.6 vs. 54.7 ± 50 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.23), while mean time to EDSS of 7 was 86.8 ± 54 vs. 80.4 ± 51 vs. 58.5 ± 47 months in seropositive, seronegative NMOSD, and MOGAD (p = 0.39)., Conclusion: No differences were observed between NMOSD (seropositive and seronegative) and MOGAD in survival curves., (© 2022. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.)

The objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 after complete vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177)., Methods: cohort study conducted between May 2021 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the appearance of infection during the follow-up time (at least three months after complete vaccination (second dose)). Data was collected through the contact between the treating physician and the patient. Specific information was requested (date, symptoms, need for hospitalization, ventilatory assistance, treatment, and evolution). The contact was made every 30 days during the period of 3 months after the full dose vaccination. A positive COVID-19 case was defined according to the definition established by the Ministry of Health in Argentina. Cumulative incidence was reported by Kaplan Meier survival curves as well as incidence density., Results: A total of 576 PwMS were included, mean age 45.2 ± 13 years, 432 (75%) RRMS, 403 (70%) were female. The mean and median time of follow-up after the second dose was 91 ± 17 and 94 ± 21 days respectively. Most frequent first and second dose received was Astra-Zeneca vaccine, followed by Sputnik V vaccine. During follow-up a total of twenty COVID-19 cases were observed for a total exposure time of 39,557 days. The overall cumulative incidence for the observed period was 3.4% (SE 0.4%) with an overall incidence density of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12). We observed more cases in woman than men with an incidence density of 6 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.9-9) vs. 3 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.2-6) respectively, but not significantly different (IRR 1.7 95% CI 0.56-7.37 p = 0.15)., Conclusion: we found an incidence density of breakthrough COVID-19 infection of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12) after vaccination in Argentina., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding this research, authorship and/or publication of this article. We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We aimed to analyze the accumulative risk of MRI and OB factors for evolution from RIS to MS in subjects included in the Argentinean MS registry (NCT03375177)., Methods: RIS subjects were identified according to RIS diagnosis criteria. Subjects were longitudinally followed with clinical and MRI at intervals of 6 months. Time from RIS identification to the first clinical event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. Multivariable Cox regression models were created to assess the independent predictive value of demographic characteristics, as well as clinical, OB and MRI data on time to the first clinical event. The single and increased risk factor of evolution of RIS was quantified., Results: A total of 88 RIS subjects, mean follow-up time 42 ± 4 months were included. 39 (44.3%) and 23 (26.1%) had a new MRI lesion or a clinical event, respectively, during the follow-up. OB (HR 5.9, 95% CI 1.29-10.1, p = 0.004), infratentorial lesions (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.09-7.5) and spinal cord lesions (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.2, p = 0.01) at RIS identification were independent predictors associated with a subsequent clinical event. The accumulative risk showed that when two of the three factors (OB, infratentorial or spinal cord lesions) were present the HR was 10.4, 95% CI 4.4-22, p < 0.001, and when three factors were present, it was HR 15.6, 95% CI 5.7-28, p < 0.001 for a relapse., Conclusion: The presence of three factors significantly increased the risk of clinical event; high-risk subjects should probably be managed by a different approach than those used for individuals without high-risk factors., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Identification of triggers that potentially instigate attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) has remained challenging. We aimed to analyze the seasonality of NMOSD and MS attacks in an Argentinean cohort seeking differences between the two disorders., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of NMOSD and MS patients followed in specialized centers from Argentina and enrolled in RelevarEM, a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS/NMOSD patients. Patients with complete relapse data (date, month and year) at onset and during follow-up were included. Attack counts were analyzed by month using a Poisson regression model with the median monthly attack count used as reference., Results: A total of 551 patients (431 MS and 120 NMOSD), experiencing 236 NMOSD-related attacks and 558 MS-related attacks were enrolled. The mean age at disease onset in NMOSD was 39.5 ± 5.8 vs. 31.2 ± 9.6 years in MS (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 6.1 ± 3.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.4 years (p < 0.01), respectively. Most of the included patients were female in both groups (79% vs. 60%, p < 0.01). We found a peak of number of attacks in June (NMOSD: 28 attacks (11.8%) vs MS: 33 attacks (5.9%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.15-2.12, p = 0.03), but no differences were found across the months in both disorders when evaluated separately. Strikingly, we observed a significant difference in the incidence rate ratio of attacks during the winter season when comparing NMOSD vs. MS (NMOSD: 75 attacks (31.7%) vs MS: 96 attacks (17.2%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.21-2.01, p = 0.02) after applying Poisson regression model. Similar results were observed when comparing the seropositive NMOSD (n = 75) subgroup vs. MS., Conclusions: Lack of seasonal variation in MS and NMOSD attacks was observed when evaluated separately. Future epidemiological studies about the effect of different environmental factors on MS and NMOSD attacks should be evaluated prospectively in Latin America population., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background PPMS (primary progressive multiple sclerosis) patients represent less than 10% of MS patients in Argentina, men and women were similarly affected and most of them had a severe functional impairment. More rapid progression has been reported in males, but this is not the case in all datasets. The main objective of our study was to determine the time to EDSS (Expanded disability Status Scale) 4, 6 and 7 in PPMS patients. We also compared the times to reach these EDSS in men and women and aimed to identify factors associated with the disability progression. Method This cohort of patients with diagnosis of PPMS (n = 253) was selected from follow-up recorded in the RelevarEM registry database. Result The median times to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 were 24 (IQR 12-48), 72 (IQR 36-96) and 96 (IQR 60-120) months, respectively. Comparison of the survival curves to EDSS 4, 6 and 7 according to gender did not show significant differences (p = 0.33, p = 0.55 and p = 0.59). There is no evidence of an association between the clinical adjustment variables (sex, age >40 years at diagnosis, EDSS > 3 at onset and multifocal MS symptoms at disease onset) and the time of arrival at the EDSS 4, 6 and 7. Conclusion Severe disability was observed six years after the onset of symptoms. No association was found between the studied factors and the time to arrival to severe disability., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: There has been an increase in the number of reports of multiple sclerosis (MS) rebound activity (RA), which is usually defined as a severe disease reactivation after natalizumab or fingolimod withdrawal that exceeds pre-treatment baseline inflammatory activity. The frequency and risk factors that could predict RA remain unknown. Fingolimod is currently the most frequently prescribed disease modifying therapy for MS in Argentina, so that there is a need to determine possible predictors of RA., Objectives: To identify risk factors for developing RA after fingolimod cessation; to describe RA characteristics, management and evolution., Methods: The study was a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of patients with MS who had discontinued fingolimod and were followed up to nine months after discontinuation. Demographic, clinical and paraclinical data was extracted, including age, gender, MS phenotype, reason for discontinuation, number of relapses during the year prior to suspension, time treated with fingolimod, EDSS before, during and after rebound, MRI findings., Results: 26 cases of RA were matched 1:1 with patients without RA. The median time elapsed to RA was 50 days. 68% showed worsening of the EDSS in the evaluation at 3 months of RA. When compared with the control group, no difference was found in terms of age, gender, phenotype, EDSS at the moment of suspension, reason for discontinuation, number of relapses in the previous year, and time on therapy., Conclusion: In this case-controlled study, no risk factors could be identified to predict RA after fingolimod cessation. Further controlled, prospective, better powered studies are needed to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to examine treatment interventions implemented in patients experiencing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) attacks (frequency, types, and response)., Methods: Retrospective study. Data on patient demographic, clinical and radiological findings, and administered treatments were collected. Remission status (complete [CR], partial [PR], no remission [NR]), based on changes in the EDSS score was evaluated before treatment, during attack, and at 6 months. CR was analyzed with a generalized estimating equations (GEEs) model., Results: A total of 131 patients (120 NMOSD and 11 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated diseases [MOGAD]), experiencing 262 NMOSD-related attacks and receiving 270 treatments were included. High-dose steroids (81.4%) was the most frequent treatment followed by plasmapheresis (15.5%). CR from attacks was observed in 47% (105/223) of all treated patients. During the first attack, we observed CR:71.2%, PR:16.3% and NR:12.5% after the first course of treatment. For second, third, fourth, and fifth attacks, CR was observed in 31.1%, 10.7%, 27.3%, and 33.3%, respectively. Remission rates were higher for optic neuritis vs. myelitis (p < 0.001). Predictor of CR in multivariate GEE analysis was age in both NMOSD (OR = 2.27, p = 0.002) and MOGAD (OR = 1.53, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: This study suggests individualization of treatment according to age and attack manifestation. The outcome of attacks was generally poor., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

The objectives of the present study were to describe the frequency of aggressive multiple sclerosis (aMS) as well as to compare clinical and radiological characteristics in aMS and non-aMS patients included in RelevarEM (NCT03375177)., Methods: The eligible study population and cohort selection included adult-onset patients (≥18 years) with definite MS. AMS were defined as those reaching confirmed EDSS ≥ 6 within 5 years from symptom onset. Confirmation was achieved when a subsequent EDSS ≥ 6 was recorded at least six months later but within 5 years of the first clinical presentation. AMS and non-aMS were compared using the χ2 test for categorical and the Mann-Whitney for continuous variables at MS onset and multivariable analysis was performed using forward stepwise logistic regression with baseline characteristics at disease onset., Results: A total of 2158 patients with MS were included: 74 aMS and 2084 non-aMS. The prevalence of aMS in our cohort was 3.4% (95%CI 2.7-4.2). AMS were more likely to be male (p = 0.003), older at MS onset (p < 0.001), have primary progressive MS (PPMS) phenotype (p = 0.03), multifocal presentation (p < 0.001), and spinal cord as well as infratentorial lesions at MRI during disease onset (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively)., Conclusion: 3.4% of our patient population could be considered aMS. Men, patients older at symptom onset, multifocal presentation, PPMS phenotype, and spinal cord as well as brainstem lesions on MRI at clinical presentation all had higher odds of having aMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no data regarding COVID-19 in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients in Latin America., Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients included in RELACOEM, a LATAM registry of MS and NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19., Methods: RELACOEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational registry of MS and NMOSD patients who suffer COVID-19 and Dengue in LATAM. Inclusion criteria to the registry were either: (1) a biologically confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis based on a positive result of a COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test on a nasopharyngeal swab; or (2) COVID-19-typical symptoms (triad of cough, fever, and asthenia) in an epidemic zone of COVID-19. Descriptive statistics were performed on demographic and clinical variables. The cohort was later stratified for MS and NMOSD and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with hospitalizations/intensive critical units (ICU) admission., Results: 145 patients were included in the registry from 15 countries and 51 treating physicians. A total of 129 (89%) were MS patients and 16 (11%) NMOSD. 81.4% patients had confirmed COVID-19 and 18.6% were suspected cases. 23 (15.8%) patients were hospitalized, 9 (6.2%) required ICU and 5 (3.4 %) died due to COVID-19. In MS patients, greater age (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.25) and disease duration (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.14-1.69) were associated with hospitalization/ICU. In NMOSD patients, a greater age (54.3 vs. 36 years, p=<0.001), increased EDSS (5.5 vs 2.9, p=0.0012) and disease duration (18.5 vs. 10.3 years, p=0.001) were significantly associated with hospitalization/ICU., Conclusion: we found that in MS patients, age and disease duration was associated with hospitalization and ICU admission requirement, while age, disease duration and EDSS was associated in NMOSD., Competing Interests: Disclosure of conflicts of interest Edgardo Cristiano has received fees for consultations as a scientific advisory board member and for travel to meetings, conferences, and clinical trials of the following companies: Avanir, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. Juan Ignacio Rojas has received honoraria from Novartis as a scientific advisor. He has received travel grants and attended courses and conferences on behalf of Merck-Serono Argentina, Novartis Argentina. Liliana Patrucco has received honoraria for scientific and research grants from Teva Tuteur, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, and Bayer Schering. Ricardo Alonso and Berenice Silva has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi -Genzyme and Roche. Orlando Garcea has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi -Genzyme and Roche. Liesbet M. Peeters has no personal pecuniary interests to disclose, other than being the chair of The MS Data Alliance (MSDA), which receives income from a range of corporate sponsors, recently including: Biogen, BristolMyersSquibb (formerly Celgene), Canopy Growth Corporation, Genzyme, Icometrix, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, QMENTA, Quanterix, Roche. The rest of authors declares no conflict of interest with the study project., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of cannabis to treat some symptoms of neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), has increased worldwide. We aimed to assess the use of cannabis in patients with MS (PwMS) from Argentina, its reasons and patients' perceptions on the management of MS symptoms. Additionally, we assessed their association with socio-demographic and clinical aspects., Methods: A cross-sectional online survey that included 281 PwMS from Argentina was conducted. Screening instruments: Demographics and clinical data, health-related QoL (MS Impact Scale-29), Fatigue Severity Scale, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sleep disorders, physical disability (self-administrated Expanded Disability Status Scale) and medical or recreational cannabis use were evaluated. A logistic regression model was carried out., Results: Current users (cannabis was used within the past year) was reported in 34.2% and former users (had tried cannabis but not used it within the past year) in 22.7%. Daily cannabis use was reported in 31.3% (current + former users) of the studied cohort, 41.9% started their use after MS diagnosis and 54.3% of them had never discussed about cannabis use with their neurologist. Recreational use was reported in 47.5%. Younger (age below 30 years) PwMS (OR = 2.39, p = 0.03), presence of chronic pain (OR = 2.42, p = 0.002) and current alcohol intake (OR = 3.33, p = 0.001) were predictors of current cannabis use in our multivariate model., Conclusion: A high prevalence of use of cannabis in PwMS from Argentina was observed. Demographic, symptoms and lifestyle factors predict cannabis use. Identifying the presence and severity of these conditions would contribute to a better MS management and treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any potential financial conflict of interest relating to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-ab) have been described in aquaporin-4-antibodies(AQP4-ab)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. We aimed to evaluate the percentage of AQP4-ab-negative NMOSD patients who are positive for MOG-ab in a cohort of Argentinean patients included in RelevarEM (Clinical Trials registry number NCT03375177)., Methods: RelevarEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational multiple sclerosis (MS) and NMOSD registry in Argentina. Of 3031 consecutive patients (until March 2020), 165 patients with phenotype of suspected NMOSD, whose relevant data for the purpose of this study were available, were included. Data on demographic, clinical, paraclinical and treatment in AQP4-ab (positive, negative and unknown) and MOG-ab (positive and negative) patients were evaluated., Results: A total of 165 patients (79 AQP4-Ab positive, 67 AQP4-Ab negative and 19 unknown) were included. Of these, 155 patients fulfilled the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. Of 67 AQP4-Ab-negative patients, 36 (53.7%) were tested for MOG-Ab and 10 of them (27.7%) tested positive. Serum AQP4-ab levels were tested by means of cell-based assay (CBA) in 48 (35.2%), based on tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assays in 58 (42.6%) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 4 (2.9%). All MOG-ab were tested by CBA. Optic neuritis (90%) was the most frequent symptom at presentation and optic nerve lesions the most frequent finding (80%) in neuroimaging of MOG-ab-associated disease. Of these, six (60%) patients were under immunosuppressant treatments at latest follow-up., Conclusion: We observed that 27.7% (10/36) of the AQP4-ab-negative patients tested for MOG-ab were positive for this antibody, in line with results from other world regions., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: The identification, diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) show significant differences between health care professionals in Argentina., Aim: To provide consensus recommendations on the management of patients with SPMS in Argentina to optimize patient care., Development: A panel of expert neurologists from Argentina dedicated to the diagnosis and care of multiple sclerosis patients gathered during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the diagnosis and treatment of SPMS patients in Argentina. To achieve consensus, the methodology of 'formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method' was used. Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. Recommendations focused on how to define SPMS and how to follow SPMS patients., Conclusion: The recommendations of this consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the care of SPMS patients in Argentina.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic immune-mediated neurological disorder in young adults, more frequently found in women than in men. Therefore, pregnancy-related issues have become an object of concern for MS professionals and patients. The aim of this work was to review the existing data to develop the first Argentine consensus for family planning and pregnancy in MS patients., Methods: A panel of expert neurologists from Argentina engaged in the diagnosis and care of MS patients met both virtually and in person during 2019 to carry out a consensus recommendation for family planning and pregnancy in MS. To achieve consensus, the procedure of the "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used., Results: Recommendations were established based on published evidence and expert opinion focusing on pre-pregnancy counseling, pregnancy, and postpartum issues., Conclusion: The recommendations of these consensus guidelines are intended to optimize the management and treatment of MS patients during their reproductive age in Argentina., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Nora Fernández Liguori has received consulting fees from Biogen Argentina, Novartis Argentina and Genzyme Argentina, as a lecturer from Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Genzyme Argentina and Biogen Argentina, and collaboration for attendance to national and international congresses from Biogen Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Merck Argentina, Bayer Argentina, Gador and Roche Argentina. Ricardo Alonso has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina and Roche Argentina. María Eugenia Balbuena has received personal compensation for speaking from Roche, professional travel/accommodation stipends from Merck, Novartis and Teva and funding for research from Genzyme and Novartis. Andrés Barboza has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Novartis, Teva, Gador, Raffo, Biosidus and Synthon-Bagó. Santiago Bestoso has received personal compensation for speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Gador and Genzyme. Marcos Burgos has received personal compensation for speaking from Merck, Novartis, Raffo, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, Roche and for research from Novartis and Biogen. Fernando Cáceres has received fees for being a member of advisory boards, for research, being a speaker and for traveling/accommodation for scientific medical meetings of the following companies: Novartis, Teva, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme and Merck. Edgar Carnero Contentti has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Teva Argentina, Roche Argentina and Bayer Argentina. Adriana Carrá has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Bayer; Biogen; Biosidus; Genzyme; Merck; MS Synthon-Bago; Novartis; Roche; Teva, Tuteur. Edgardo Cristiano received consulting fees, funding for advisory boards and educational support from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis and Roche. Norma Deri has received personal compensation for advisory boards for Bayer Argentina, Bayer Latinoamerica, Bayer Global, Merck Serono Argentina, Merck Serono Global, Genzyme Argentina, Genzyme Latinoamerica, Genzyme Global and Sanofi Global; for travel/ accommodation from Schering, Bayer, Serono, Merck Serono, Novartis, Biogen Idec, Teva-Tuteur, Teva and Roche; for research from Bayer Argentina, Biogen Idec Argentina,Genzyme Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Roche Argentina, Teva Argentina and Sanofi Argentina and for educational presentations from Bayer Argentina, Merck Serono Argentina and Genzyme Argentina. Marcela Fiol has received personal compensation for developing educational presentations, serving on a scientific advisory board from Merck-Serono Argentina, Sanofi Genzyme Argentina, TEVA-Tuteur Argentina and has received travel/accommodations stipends from Merck-Serono Argentina, Sanofi Genzyme Argentina, Biogen INC, Bayer Inc, Novartis, TEVA-Tuteur Argentina, ROCHE Argentina. María Inés Gaitán has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, from Roche Argentina, Merck Argentina, Biogen Argentina, Sanofi-Genzyme Argentina, Bayer Inc Argentina and Novartis Argentina, and has received travel/accommodations stipends from Merck Argentina, Biogen Argentina, Roche Argentina, Novartis Argentina, and TEVA Argentina. Orlando Garcea has received personal compensation for consulting and speaking from Bayer, Merck, Biogen, Novartis and Genzyme. Mario Javier Halfon has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Biogen Argentina, Merck Argentina, Roche, Gador, Novartis, and Genzyme Argentina. Javier Hryb has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, and travel grants to congresses from Teva, Merck, Biogen, Roche, Tuteur, Synthon Bago and Novartis. Miguel Jacobo has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congresses from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Genzyme Novartis, Teva, Bayer, Raffo and Gador. Eduardo Knorre has received personal compensation for professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Bagó, Tuteur and Roche. Pablo López has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on scientific advisory boards, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche and Bayer. Jimena Miguez has received personal compensation for professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche and for speaking from Merck, Novartis and Roche. Pedro Nofal has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congress from Novartis, Biogen, Merck Serono, Raffo, Genzyme, Gador and Bayer Schering. Raúl Piedrabuena has received personal compensation for the development of educational activities, serving on a scientific advisory board and research from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche and Teva. Cecilia Pita has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congress from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis and Roche. Juan Ignacio Rojas has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Berenice Silva has received economic retribution for the development of educational, scientific activities and travel grants to congresses from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Genzyme, TEVA, Bayer, Tuteur and Roche. Vladimiro Sinay has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Biosidus, Gador, Tuteur and Raffo/ Asofarma. Adriana Tarulla reports personal fees for speaking and support for travel to meetings from Bayer,Biogen Idec,Biosidus,Gador,Ivax-Teva,Merck Serono and Roche, out-side the submitted work. Darío Tavolini has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva. Santiago Tizio has received professional travel accommodation stipends from Merck-Serono, Synthon Bago, Biogen-Idec, TEVA, Genzyme, Novartis and Roche; reimbursement for developing educational presentations from Biogen-Idec and Novartis and honoraria for advisory services from Merck-Serono, and Novartis. Verónica Tkachuk: has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Biogen, Roche, Merck, TEVA, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer y Raffo. Carlos Vrech has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Synthon Bago, Gador and Genzyme. Maria Célica Ysrraelit has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Roche and Bayer Argentina. Liliana Patrucco has received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Roche. Has received travel grants and attended courses and conferences on behalf of Merck-Serono, Genzyme and Roche. All the other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The objective of this study was to describe and compare the baseline epidemiological data of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients included in RelevarEM (Clinical Trials registry number NCT03375177)., Methods: RelevarEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational MS and NMOSD registry in Argentina. Epidemiological and comorbidity data from MS and NMOSD patients were described and compared. For comorbidities, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was used to calculate the burden at entry. CCI was stratified in 0 and ≥ 1 and described for the entire cohort., Results: A total of 1588 and 75 MS and NMOSD patients (respectively) were included. For MS patients, the mean age was 42 ± 7 years, female sex 65.3%, mean EDSS 2, and mean disease duration 8 ± 6 years. In NMOSD, the mean age was 40 ± 7 years, female sex 78.7%, mean disease duration 5 ± 3.5 years, and mean EDSS 2.5. The most frequent MS phenotype was RRMS in 82.4%. In MS, the CCI was 0 in 85.8.2% while ≥ 1 was in 14.2% of patients. Regarding phenotype stratification, CCI ≥ 1 was 3.9% in CIS, 13.5% in RRMS, 28.7% in SPMS, and 17.4% in PPMS (p < 0.001 between groups). In NMOSD, the CCI was 0 in 64% while ≥ 1 was in 36%. The MS/NMOSD ratio found was 21/1., Conclusions: This is the first analysis of the longitudinal Argentinean registry of MS and NMOSD describing and comparing conditions that contributes to provide reliable real-world data in the country.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a low prevalence in Argentina. However, MS has a high burden of disease, which implies frequent neurological visits, magnetic resonance images (MRI) use and chronic MS medication during follow-up, with a high impact on the healthcare system. Therefore, MS care is essential to optimize disease management and improve patients' outcome. We aimed to evaluate the access and barriers to MS care and identified differences in treatment and management of MS patients over a period of 12 months in an Argentinean cohort., Methods: A cross-sectional study based on a self-administered survey was carried out from August to December 2017 in 13 provinces from Argentina. MS patients (n = 219) were divided into three groups as follows: prepaid health insurance (PHI), social health insurance (SHI) and state-run health insurance (SRHI, Public Health Ministry) and they were assessed in order to detect differences in employment, access and barriers to MS care (neurological visit, MRI use and MS medication)., Results: A total of 185 (84.5%) MS patients were employed (full-time: 59%), 34 (15.5%) were currently unemployed and 15 (6.8%) retired by MS. In addition, 132 had SHI, 45 PHI and 40 SRHI. No statistical differences were found in disease severity, frequency of neurological visit, waiting time for neurological visit as well as frequency and waiting time for MRI use. MS patients with SRHI experienced a longer waiting time (first prescription and during follow-up) and inappropriate delivery of MS medication during follow-up compared to MS patients with PHI and SHI. A total of 8/45 (17.7%) in PHI, 17/40 (42.5%) in SRHI and 25/132 (18.9%) in SHI did not receive the MS medication as properly as prescribed for their neurologists. PHI was independently associated with appropriate delivery of MS medication (OR = 0.81, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: This study showed that MS patients had access barriers to receive MS medication properly, especially those with SRHI (public sector)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite that different registries already exist in various countries in Europe and North America, no ongoing nationwide registry exists in Latin America (LATAM), a region where the disease behaves differently than in other regions. The objective of this document is to describe the methodology behind RelevarEM, the first nationwide MS registry in Argentina and LATAM. METHODS: In this article, we described the creation, implementation and data management of the nationwide MS registry in Argentina. The registry contains information on the structure, ethical aspects, implementation and variables of the registry (Clinical Trials registry number NCT NCT03375177). CONCLUSION: RelevarEM is the first MS nationwide registry in Argentina, as well as in LATAM, with the objective of providing reliable real-world data of MS in the country., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)