Search

Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: There is paucity of literature comparing foot and general health status including quality of life between patients presenting with Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus and to compare the outcomes of people how had surgery in either one. We compared foot specific patient reported disability and general health status between patients presenting with Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus pre and post-surgery. Methods: All patients operated between June 2016 and December 2017 with a diagnosis of primary Hallux Valgus or Hallux Rigidus were invited to the study. Patients were grouped based on diagnosis into Group A (Hallux Valgus) and Group B (Hallux Rigidus). All patients received a Pre-Operative and post-operative questionnaire with a minimum of 6 months follow up. Differences were studied between groups for scores of MOX-FQ, EQ-5D (UK) and Foot and Ankle outcomes scores (FAOS) comparing both pre and post-operative. Results: There were 53 patients with Hallux Valgus and 46 patients with Hallux Rigidus of 1st MTPJ. Pre-operatively in MOX-FQ both groups reported similar level of pain (p=0.776), difficulty with walking/ standing (p= 0.960) and restriction with social activity because of foot symptoms (p=0.683). Following surgery both groups significantly improved in all domains (p< 0.001). Post- operatively there was no difference between both groups for MOX-FQ (pain, walking, social domains; p>0.05), EQ-5D general health score (p=0.404) and FAOS domains for pain (p=0.653), symptoms (p=0.230), ADL (p=0.587), and quality of life (p=0.876). But all scores improved significantly from pre-op to post-op for both groups (p

Category: Service improvement Introduction/Purpose: The foot and ankle services at NUTH incorporates both elective and trauma services. The elective service carries out on average 10,500- 11,000 review appointments/ year and 4000-4500 new patient appointments/year. The waiting times for new out-patient appointments were 8-14 weeks. A new pathway was designed with the aim to improve 18 week national target compliance, improve departmental efficiency, and improve patient satisfaction. Methods: A new initial assessment clinic pathways was designed were all new patients are seen in a one hour slot one stop clinic by a dedicated Extended Scope Practitioner. History and clinical examination are taken as well as initial Proms questionnaire, x-ray assessment followed by gate analysis including pain map, treadmill assessment and plantar pressure analysis. A consultant led MDT review of the finding is performed the same week where plan for treatment or further investigations is formulated. Results: A total of 1792 patients had the initial assessment through the new clinic pathway between March 2016 and March 2018. The average waiting time for the initial assessment has been gradually reduced from 14 to 3 weeks. We obtained over 96% patient satisfaction in enhancing patient experience. Conclusion: Our new clinic model has shown to improve efficiency, patient satisfaction and reduce waiting times.

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a broad term that describes a clinically heterogeneous group of arthritides of unknown cause, which begin before 16 years of age persist for more than 6 weeks. It is one of the main diseases affecting Paediatric age group Joints in a form of a chronic, long standing and debilitating disease. It is estimated that 1 in 1000 children present with JIA in the UK alone. Radiographic progression of the disease occurs early, and if not addressed may result in permanent joint destruction and poor functional outcomes. The ankle is frequently involved, but it is unclear whether this is due to synovitis, tenosynovitis. To date, no evidence of combined therapies or integrated care for juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients with F&A problems exists. Methods: JIA patients with ankle involvement presented to orthopedic foot and ankle services between 2012-2017 were include. All patients had weight bearing x-rays ankle measuring Tibio talar angle, also underwent Ankle MRI following standard hospital MRI protocols. The MRI scans were used to measure the affected areas in talus. Talus was divided into 4 anatomical regions (Anterio-medial, Anterio-lateral, posterior-medial, posterolateral). lesion involving wider areas were recorded as two or more regions accordingly, i.e.: AM and PM involvement at the same time were given yes for area of involvement in both region and recorded separately. Bilateral Ankles involvement were also recorded. Tibial growth plate involvement in these patients on the MRI scan was recorded. Demographic data was collected along with side, disease pattern, age at diagnosis and age at presentation to F&A speciality and patients requiring surgical intervention. Measurements were carried out by two in dependent orthopaedics F&A surgeons. Results: 14 patients were included in this study with a total of 17 ankles. 12 were females (N=12, 85.7%). Mean age was between 8-21 years (15.0 ± 4.08, M±SD). Time to presentation was 2.9 to 8.4 years (5.1 ± 1.4 years). 5 had Oligo-articular involvement (37.5%),9 patients had polyA (64.2%). 11/17 Right Ankles (64.7%), 3 left (21.4%). 3 bilateral (21.4%). 11/17 Ankles in Varus (64.7%), 1/17 valgus (5.8%), 5/17 neutral (29.4%). Mean Tibiotalar angle was 80° ± 13.5° (Range 49° - 100°). 12/17(70.5%) had involvement of the antero-medial part of the talus,1/17(5.8%)antero-lateral, 8/17 postero-medial(47.06%), 3/17(17.6%) postero-lateral . All the patients with postero-lateral involvement, they also had postero-medial involvement. (p=0.043). 13/17 ankles (76.4%) had tibial growth plate involvement. 5 patients (35.7%) had subsequent operations. Conclusion: This study shows a pattern of involvement in the talus and the effect this disease has on Tibiotalar alignment. This needs to be confirmed on a larger number of patients. And highlights the need for an earlier presentation of these patients to F&A surgeon to prevent the disease sequela. Further research is required to study the tibial growth plate involvement for its contribution to the varus / valgus deformity in a chronological method. Further research is also required to quantify the time frame for disease and deformity progression in the Tibiotalar Joint.

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Bone strength about the components is an important factor in Arthroplasty survival. This importance has been studied in total hip & knee replacement. However, there is paucity of literature Where little has been published regarding the quality of the bone and bone mineral content postoperatively surrounding Ankle Arthroplasty and circumstances surrounding the development of stress fracture. This prospective study used a method to quantify Bone Mineral Density BMD in different regions of the surrounding bones adjacent to tibia and talar components of uncemented Mobility ankle prosthesis, and to study the effect of loading on local ankle bone in the presence of un-cemented three components ankle replacement, by analyzing the BMD of the areas around tibia and talus before and after Mobility total ankle replacement. Methods: Twenty three Ankles (7Females, 15 Males) who underwent a Mobility Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) between March 2008 and April 2009 were included prospectively in this study. They underwent a Bone Density Scan using the DEXA HOLIGIC Scanner with the specific method designed for measuring BMD. Seven areas (R1-R7) around the prosthesis were studied (Please see attached figure). Scans were carried out pre-operatively and repeated at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. The results were also compared with clinical outcomes, using (AOFAS scores) both pre, 1 and 2 years post-op. Results: Mean age of patients was 63.3 years (SD 9, range 43 to 80). AOFAS scores showed significant improvement (from 28.8 pre-op to 78.7,76.9 at 12 and 24 months post-op respectively; p

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement as a valid treatment for end stage ankle arthritis, is gaining popularity and every year there is an increasing number of procedures. With revision rates as high as 21% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years there is a need for understanding and reporting the outcome of revision ankle replacement. Our aim was to study the patient reported outcomes following revision TAR with a minimum of 2 year follow up. Methods: All patients that underwent a revision total ankle replacement between 2012 and 2016 were included in the study. All patients received a post-operative questionnaire comprising of MOX-FQ score, EQ-5D (UK) and Foot and Ankle outcomes scores (FAOS) and patients satisfaction questionnaire with a minimum of 2 years follow up. Results: 32 patients had a revision total ankle replacement between 2012 and 2016. 2 patients were deceased therefore 30 patients were included in the study. 5 patients declined participation for completing questionnaires. We received 21 (66%) completed questionnaires. The mean MOX-FQ average domain score for pain was 58.8, walking/standing 65.8 and social function was 48.2. The mean FAOS scores were 50.7 for pain, 50.6 for symptoms, 54.9 for ADL and 28.2 for quality of life. The mean overall health score today for EQ-5D was 67.8/100. 45% of patients were satisfied with the pain relief and return to sports and recreation obtained following the operation, 48% were satisfied with the improved in daily activities. 52% were overall satisfied with the results from surgery. Conclusion: Revision total ankle replacement gives overall satisfactory results demonstrated from patients reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years following surgery.

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Prevalence of degenerative disease of the joints of the foot is likely to be very low in the general population, as demonstrated by a previous cadaveric study (Muehleman et al. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 1997; 5 (1): 23-37). We hypothesised that the prevalence of these changes may be higher in patients presenting with ankle arthritis and we report the prevalence of these additional findings and their effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) at presentation. Methods: 247 patients presented to our unit with ankle arthritis, which later went on to require total ankle replacement and were therefore included in our local joint replacement registry. Of these, 125 had available pre-operative MRI imaging. These images were reviewed by an orthopaedic resident and consultant radiologist. Results: 93 patients had evidence of degenerative change to other joints in the foot. The mean number of other joints affected was 1.25. The most common joints affected were the subtalar (67), talonavicular (32), tarsometatarsal (28), naviculocuneiform (21) and calcaneocuboid (5) joints. 92 patients had completed pre-operative FAOS scores. Multiple ANOVA of this data demonstrated no significant difference between the group with only ankle arthritis and those with other degenerative joints in terms of pre-operative FAOS score (p >0.05). In a subset of 19 patients who had pain diagrams available, most patients did not indicate areas of pain in the regions of their other degenerative joints. Pain drawings suggested 0% TMTJ, 25% TNJ and 78% subtalar joints were symptomatic at presentation. Conclusion: Most patients presenting with ankle arthritis will have at least one additional area of significant degenerative joint disease somewhere in the foot. Many of these will not be overtly symptomatic at the time of presentation and number and location of other degenerative joints in the foot does not result in significant differences in pre-operative PROMS, from those reported in patients with only ankle arthritis.

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for end stage ankle arthritis. Achieving normal anatomical alignment has been shown to be important in long term outcomes and revision rates. Recent data from the British NJR has shown that revision rates are higher in patients with pre-operative fixed equinus. Although there is literature about surgical techniques to deal with pre-operative equinus we are not aware of any papers presenting patient outcomes. We present patient reported outcomes for our cohort of patients with pre-operative fixed equinus compared to those able to achieve a plantigrade ankle. Methods: This is a single surgeon, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases. A mobile bearing prosthesis was used (Mobility TAA system, DePuy, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA). Cases were identified from a locally held joint registry which routinely records PROMS data pre-operatively and at annual intervals post-operatively. Patients undergoing primary TAA between March 2006 and June 2014 were included, revision procedures along with those with inadequate PROMS data were excluded. PROMS scores used were FAOS (WOMAC Pain, Function and Stiffness), SF-36 scores and patient satisfaction. All pre-operative lateral weight bearing xrays were reviewed to screen for potential fixed equinus deformity (tibia-sole angle >90 degrees). Clinical records were then reviewed to confirm clinical diagnosis of fixed equinus deformity. Results: 259 cases were identified, 95 cases were excluded based on our criteria leaving 164 cases for analysis (mean follow up 61.6 months). 144 were classified as neutral and 20 as fixed equinus. The fixed equinus group were significantly younger (neutral 64.2 vs equinus 53.9, p=0.0002), there was no difference in BMI or length of follow up. There was no difference in baseline scores except WOMAC stiffness, with the fixed equinus group significantly worse (36.9 vs 25.6, p=0.0014). Final PROMS score, change from baseline and patient satisfaction was the same in all domains for both groups. There was no difference in revision rates. Conclusion: A pre-operative fixed equinus deformity does not negatively impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAA. We are not aware of any previous studies to compare results. As expected the equinus group showed higher levels of stiffness pre-operatively. Contrary to the British NJR dataset we did not find a difference in revision rates.

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Arthrodesis is a safe and effective treatment for a number of hind and midfoot conditions. However, non-union rates have historically been reported as high as 41%. A number of factors have been identified that increase non-union rates, the most notable and readily modifiable is a patient’s smoking status. Smoking rates in the UK in 2015 were 19.3% for men and 15.3% for women. We have examined the effect of smoking status (current, ex-smokers and non-smokers) on union rates for a large cohort of patients undergoing hind or midfoot arthrodesis. Methods: This is a single surgeon, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases. The surgeon’s logbook was used to identify patients undergoing any hind and midfoot arthrodesis procedures from January 2010 until September 2016. Revision procedures and charcot arthropathy cases were excluded along with cases with insufficient records available. Demographic data was collected along with: joints involved, surgical implant used, bone grafting, the use of ultrasound bone stimulation (EXOGEN, Bioventus LLC, Durham, USA) therapy, complications and final outcome with regards to union. Patients were divided according to self-reported smoking status at pre-operative assessment; current smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers. Union outcome was based on clinical notes and included patient symptoms and radiographic evidence. Delayed union was classed as union occurring after 6 months. The effect of smoking status on deep infection rates and the need for EXOGEN therapy was also analysed. Results: 381 joints were included (see image). The smoking prevalence was 14.0% (accounting for 12.3% of joints) and 32.2% ex-smokers (35.4%). The groups were comparable with regards to gender, diabetes status and BMI. Smokers were younger, had less co-morbidities and were less likely to have had multiple joints fused (p

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is increasing evidence that outcomes for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are not adversely affected by pre-operative varus deformity. There is a sparsity of evidence relating to outcomes in valgus ankle arthritis. We present our outcomes using a mobile bearing prosthesis (Mobility TAA system, DePuy, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA) with a comparison of neutral, varus and valgus ankles. Methods: This is a single surgeon, retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases. Cases were identified from a locally held joint registry which routinely records PROMS data pre-operatively and at annual intervals. Patients undergoing primary TAA between March 2006 and June 2014 were included. Rrevision procedures along with those with inadequate radiographic images for deformity analysis were excluded. Patients with inadequate PROMS data were included in the radiological analysis but not the PROMS analysis. Data collected included FAOS (Womac Pain, Function and Stiffness), SF-36 scores and patient satisfaction. Radiological data was gathered from routinely taken AP weight bearing radiographs pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively and at final follow up. Pre-operative deformity was measured between the tibial anatomical axis and a line perpendicular to the talus. Patients were classified as neutral, varus (≥10 degrees varus) or valgus (≥10 degrees valgus). Results: 230 cases (see image) underwent radiological classification (152 neutral, 60 varus, 18 valgus) and were included in the radiological analysis (mean follow-up 55.9 months). 164 cases were included in the PROMS analysis (mean follow-up 61.6 months). The groups were similar with regards to BMI and length of follow-up but neutral ankles were younger (P

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is paucity of literature on quantitative gait changes in patients with increased coronal plane deformity along with end stage ankle arthritis. We aimed to study the difference in spatial temporal parameters of gait and patient reported functional measure in patients with end stage arthritis and no coronal plane deformity vs. varus deformity of >10? Methods: All patients diagnosed with end stage arthritis between April 2016 and December 2017 underwent an objective gait assessment using Tekscan system (BioSense Medicals, UK) as part of routine clinical practice. Of this cohort, patients with bilateral ankle arthritis, previous reconstructive surgery, inflammatory arthritis, hip and knee arthritis, spinal pathology and underlying neurological conditions were excluded. Patients with unilateral ankle arthritis for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis or post traumatic arthritis were included in this study. These patients were grouped into Group A (no coronal plane deformity) vs. Group B (varus deformity of more than 10?). In these patients differences were studied between the groups for temporal spatial parameters of gait and functional disability levels measured by MOX-FQ scores. Statistical tests included normality tests, student t’tests, chi square evaluation and analysis of variance tests with SPSS. Results: Of 33 patients, 22 were in Group A (N=22) and 10 in Group B (N=10). There was no difference in mean age between groups (61.5 vs. 65.07; p=0.335; diagnosis was predominantly OA in both groups MOX-FQ: - There were similar levels of pain (p=0.570), difficulty with walking / standing (p=0.492) and restriction in social activities (p=0.869) reported Quantitative gait measures: - For spatial parameters, there was no difference between groups; p>0.05. - For temporal parameters, there was decreased step time(s) (0.67 vs. 0.61) and mid stance times (0.38 s vs. 0.30 s) in Group B; borderline statistical significance (p=0.052). - There was increase in stride velocity measured in Group B (79.1 ± 22.7 m/s) compared to Group A (64.0 ± 18.1 m/s), (p=0.05). Conclusion: - Although there were no differences in functional levels of pain, difficulty with walking / standing and restriction in social activities, measured by MOX-FQ, there were differences observed in objective gait parameters. - Patients in both groups demonstrated antalgic gait patterns; this was slightly increased in varus group. - There is a trend for reduction in temporal parameters and stride velocity in patients with end stage ankle arthritis and coronal plane deformity >10?, when compared to patients with end stage arthritis and no coronal plane deformity - Larger clinical study with increased sample size is required to confirm these findings.

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: There is paucity of literature comparing foot and general health status including quality of life between patients presenting with Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus. We aimed to compare foot specific patient reported disability and general health status including higher functional activities and quality of life reported between patients presenting with Hallux Valgus and Hallux Rigidus. Methods: All patients who presented at our hospital foot and ankle clinics (between June 2016 and December 2017) with a diagnosis of primary Hallux Valgus or Hallux Rigidus were included in this prospective study. Patients with associated foot problems, bilateral presentations, h/o previous reconstructive surgeries, and underlying neurological conditions were excluded. These patients were grouped based on diagnosis into Group A (Hallux Valgus) and Group B (Hallux Rigidus). In these patients, differences were studied between groups for scores of MOX-FQ Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (Domains: Pain, Walking/Standing, Social activities), EQ-5D EuroQol (UK) and Foot and Ankle outcomes scores (FAOS) (Domains: Pain, symptoms, ADL, Recreation, Quality of Life). Statistical tests between groups included tests for normality, student t’tests and chi square tabulation tests using SPSS software. Results: MOX-FQ differences: - Both groups reported similar level of pain (59.6 ± 22.6 vs. 58.2 ± 23.3); p=0.776; Difficulty with walking/ standing (61.6 vs. 61.4 ); p= 0.960; and restriction with social activity because of foot symptoms (61.6 vs. 59.7 ); p=0.683 EQ-5D: - For mobility, both groups reported no (21.7% vs. 26.8); slight (28.2% vs. 29.2%) or moderate (34.7% vs. 31.7%) problems; p=0.931. For self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/ depression levels, there was no differences between groups; p>0.05. Mean overall general health scores was (71.3 ± 22.8) and (69.5 ± 20.8); p=0.663 FAOS: - There was no difference in mean pain score (59.6 vs. 58.2; p=0.776), symptoms (70.3 vs. 63.8; p=0.104), ADL score (p=0.587), difficulty with sport/ recreation (p=0.907) or Quality of Life (p=0.662) between groups Conclusion: - There is no difference in foot related quality of life, general health status and higher functional disability levels between patients presenting with Hallux Valgus vs. Hallux Rigidus. - The impact of these conditions on disability levels remain the same, amidst the difference in pathology

Category: Ankle Arthritis, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: There is wide array of outcome tools available for assessment of level of pain and symptoms in osteoarthritis, there are less disease and region specific outcome measures to evaluate the level of disability caused by arthritis in ankle, mid foot arthritis (including Talo-navicular joint, Calcaneo-cuboid joint and tarso metatarsal joints) and 1st Metatarso phalangeal joints. We aimed to measure the level of disability incorporating elements of physical, mental and social well-being using patient reported outcome measures as recommended by the International classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF) Methods: This is a prospective data series, patients with arthritis of ankle, mid foot or 1st MTPJ who were diagnosed in new patient clinic were asked to take part in this survey. They completed a questionnaire consisting of MOX-FQ (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire), EQ-5D (General Health Status) and FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores). Patients were grouped in to 3 groups (Group A - ankle arthritis. Group B - midfoot arthritis (either Talo navicular, Calcaneo-cuboid or TMT joint); Group C - arthritis of 1st Metatarso-phalangeal joint of the foot). The results of summary scores were calculated for responses to individual questions and compared between the groups. Demographic factors were included in the statistical analysis carried out using SPSS Version 22, Illinois. Results are reported as follows Results: There were 26 patients in (Group A); 12 patients in (Group B) and 19 patients in (Group C). There was no difference in mean age of patients between groups (p>0.05) For components in MOX-FQ, there was no difference in pain scores (p=0.353) between the groups. For difficulty with walking/standing, Group A patients reported significantly worse scores (77 ± 19.4) when compared to Group C (53.7 ± 35.5). There was no difference in scores between groups for social function component of MOX- FQ (p=0.487). For EQ-5D, although Group C patients reported higher scores they failed to achieve statistical significance (p>0.05). For FAOS, Group A patients reported significantly lower scores for pain and symptoms, ADL, ability to take part in Sports/Recreation (p=0.008) and Quality of Life (p=0.003). Conclusion: In conclusion, although patients with ankle arthritis, mid foot arthritis and 1st MTP joint arthritis report similar level of disability in terms of general health and social function, patients with ankle arthritis reported higher level of disability in terms of pain, difficulty with standing/ Walking, ability to do Activities of Daily living, ability to take part in recreational activities and overall Quality of Life.

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Topographic pain mapping has gained popularity during 20th century, providing opportunities for patients to demonstrate spatial distribution of pain. Despite this, evidence of clinical application in orthopaedics remains largely limited to spinal pathologies. We investigate how clinician interpretation of routine radiological studies compares to patient pain mapping in ankle arthritis. Methods: Between 2014 and 2016 we identified 21 patients ultimately diagnosed with ankle arthritis, who underwent comprehensive gait analysis (including topographic pain mapping) on referral to our institution. Patients were requested to map up to three pain areas, assigning a visual analogue score (VAS) of 0-10, to signify severity of pain in each area. A consultant orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon, and orthopaedic trainees undertook blinded evaluation of relevant radiological studies, estimating patients’ mapping and VAS scores on the basis of radiological pathology. For the purpose of analysis findings were applied to five distinct regions around the ankle: three anterior (antero-medial; central; and antero-lateral), lateral and medial. Results were correlated between the different assessors, as well as to the patients’ pain mapping, using Spearman’s Rho & Kendall Tau correlation statistics, significance taken as p=0.05). Correlation to patient pain mapping was even poorer, with radiological assessment consistently over- estimating symptom severity (p=>0.05). Conclusion: There is a statistically strong correlation between topographic pain mapping and radiological evaluation of ankle arthritis. We strongly recommend that additional pathology around the ankle is excluded by use of pre-operative MRI imaging prior to surgery for ankle arthritis. Pain from ankle arthritis appears to mask additional soft tissue pathology surrounding the ankle noted on MRI scan.

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Pilon fractures of the distal tibia are high energy injuries often occurring in a young patient cohort. Despite optimal acute fracture management, post traumatic osteoarthritis of the tibiotalar joint is a common corollary. Standard treatment is by way of tibiotalar arthrodesis, however the lack of motion at the ankle afforded by this treatment is often poorly tolerated by patients and can lead to arthrosis of adjacent joints. Total ankle replacement (TAR) offers an attractive pain relieving and motion preserving option for this patient subgroup. Here we report the two-year patient reported outcome measures for a cohort of patients undergoing TAR for osteoarthritis secondary to tibial pilon fracture and compare them to the outcomes for other indications for total ankle replacement. Methods: The results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for TAR performed between March 2006 and November 2014 by a single surgeon at a single institution in the United Kingdom were reviewed. Data collected included Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) (WOMAC pain/stiffness/function); SF-36 General Health Questionnaire; number of comorbidities; self- reported BMI and patient satisfaction scores. Time points for data collection were pre-operatively and then at one and two years post-operatively. Clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed to highlight the indication for TAR and were categorised into the following sub-groups: osteoarthritis (OA); rheumatoid arthritis (RA); arthritis following pilon fracture; arthritis following ankle fracture; and post-traumatic arthritis without previous fracture (PTOA). FAOS and SF-36 were analysed using a general linear model to assess variance and by way of repeated measures ANOVA. Demographic data was assessed using student t-test and chi- squared analysis. Patient satisfaction scores were evaluated using cross-tabulation and chi-squared examination. Results: The pilon fracture group had the youngest average age and highest BMI (56.5 years; mean BMI 31.6). There was no statistically significant difference in number of reported comorbidities between subgroups (p>0.05). Significant improvement in FAOS pain, function and stiffness scores was seen in all subgroups from pre-operatively to one year post-operatively (p=0.01, 0.05 and 0.03 respectively). No further statistically significant improvement in the same scores was seen at two years. SF-36 analysis demonstrated similar results for all subgroups. There was general improvement in all parameters except for general health (p=0.890 at one year) and reduction in physical function in the RA group from first to second post-operative years (p=0.046). Patient satisfaction survey showed similar results for all subgroups. Conclusion: Our study has demonstrated that statistically significant improvement is seen in FAOS pain, function and stiffness scores in all subgroups of patients undergoing TAR by one year post surgery and that this improvement is maintained by two year follow up. There was no major difference in any of the reported outcomes between subgroups by two years post-operatively, suggesting that TAR performed for arthritis secondary to pilon fracture is a realistic alternative to tibio-talar arthrodesis.