Search

Real‐world data (RWD) and real‐world evidence (RWE) are now being routinely used in epidemiology, clinical practice, and post‐approval regulatory decisions. Despite the increasing utility of the methodology and new regulatory guidelines in recent years, there remains a lack of awareness of how this approach can be applied in clinical pharmacology and translational research settings. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (ASCPT) held a workshop on March 21st, 2023 entitled "Advancing the Utilization of Real‐World Data (RWD) and Real‐World Evidence (RWE) in Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Research." The work described herein is a summary of the workshop proceedings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law in 2016, real‐world data (RWD) and real‐world evidence (RWE) have attracted great interest from the healthcare ecosystem globally. The potential and capability of RWD/RWE to inform regulatory decisions and clinical drug development have been extensively reviewed and discussed in the literature. However, a comprehensive review of current applications of RWD/RWE in clinical pharmacology, particularly from an industry perspective, is needed to inspire new insights and identify potential future opportunities for clinical pharmacologists to utilize RWD/RWE to address key drug development questions. In this paper, we review the RWD/RWE applications relevant to clinical pharmacology based on recent publications from member companies in the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) RWD Working Group, and discuss the future direction of RWE utilization from a clinical pharmacology perspective. A comprehensive review of RWD/RWE use cases is provided and discussed in the following categories of application: drug–drug interaction assessments, dose recommendation for patients with organ impairment, pediatric plan development and study design, model‐informed drug development (e.g., disease progression modeling), prognostic and predictive biomarkers/factors identification, regulatory decisions support (e.g., label expansion), and synthetic/external control generation for rare diseases. Additionally, we describe and discuss common sources of RWD to help guide appropriate data selection to address questions pertaining to clinical pharmacology in drug development and regulatory decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the liver being the primary site for clearance of xenobiotics utilizing a myriad of mechanisms ranging from cytochrome P450 enzyme pathways, glucuronidation, and biliary excretion, there is a dearth of information available as to how the severity of hepatic impairment (HI) can alter drug absorption and disposition (i.e., pharmacokinetics [PK]) as well as their efficacy and safety or pharmacodynamics (PD). In general, regulatory agencies recommend conducting PK studies in subjects with HI when hepatic metabolism/excretion accounts for more than 20% of drug elimination or if the drug has a narrow therapeutic range. In this tutorial, we provide an overview of the global regulatory landscape, clinical measures for hepatic function assessment, methods to stage HI severity, and consequently the impact on labeling. In addition, we provide an in-depth practical guidance for designing and conducting clinical trials for patients with HI and on the application of modeling and simulation strategies in lieu of dedicated trials for dosing recommendations in patients with HI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review aimed to evaluate the clinical success of clopidogrel dosing based on CYP2C19 genotype and to identify the relevant additional factors that may be useful for consideration by the clinician when dosing individuals with clopidogrel. The results indicated that genotype‐guided dosing in individuals with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is frequently practiced, although the advantages remain controversial. Demographic factors, such as age, ethnicity, and some comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, can potentially contribute to further refinement of clopidogrel dosage but additional clinical studies to guide these practices are required. Drugs that are CYP2C19 or CYP3A4 inhibitors may reduce the effectiveness of clopidogrel and should be carefully considered during co‐administration. In particular, as stated in the clopidogrel label, concomitant use with strong or moderate CYP2C19 inhibitors, such as omeprazole, should be avoided. Increased exposure and response to clopidogrel has been observed in smokers. Noteworthy, a very recent study has shown that smoking cessation in clopidogrel patients may result in reduced response and carries the risk of high on‐clopidogrel platelet reactivity. Recent studies have shown clinically significant increases in exposure to CYP2C8 substrates (repaglinide, dasabuvir, and desloratadine) and a CYP2B6 substrate (s‐sibutramine) following co‐administration with clopidogrel, indicating that therapeutic strategies with clopidogrel should avoid these drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various regulatory authorities such as the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), the United States Food and Drug administration (FDA), and the Canadian Drug and Health Agency (CDHA) are emphasizing on the purity requirements and the identification of impurities in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). The various sources of impurity in pharmaceutical products are - reagents, heavy metals, ligands, catalysts, other materials like filter aids, charcoal, and the like, degraded end products obtained during \ after manufacturing of bulk drugs from hydrolysis, photolytic cleavage, oxidative degradation, decarboxylation, enantiomeric impurity, and so on. The different pharmacopoeias such as the British Pharmacopoeia, United State Pharmacopoeia, and Indian Pharmacopoeia are slowly incorporating limits to allowable levels of impurities present in APIs or formulations. Various methods are used to isolate and characterize impurities in pharmaceuticals, such as, capillary electrophoresis, electron paramagnetic resonance, gas-liquid chromatography, gravimetric analysis, high performance liquid chromatography, solid-phase extraction methods, liquid-liquid extraction method, Ultraviolet Spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, supercritical fluid extraction column chromatography, mass spectrometry, Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and RAMAN spectroscopy. Among all hyphenated techniques, the most exploited techniques for impurity profiling of drugs are Liquid Chromatography (LC)-Mass Spectroscopy (MS), LC-NMR, LC-NMR-MS, GC-MS, and LC-MS. This reveals the need and scope of impurity profiling of drugs in pharmaceutical research.