Search

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, complex inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that presents significant therapeutic challenges. Despite the availability of a wide range of treatments, many patients experience primary non-response, secondary loss of response, or adverse events, limiting the overall effectiveness of current therapies. Clinical trials often report response rates below 60%, partly due to stringent inclusion criteria. Emerging therapies that target novel pathways offer promise in overcoming these limitations. This review explores the latest investigational drugs in phases I, II, and III clinical trials for treating both luminal and perianal CD. We highlight promising therapies that target known mechanisms, including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and IL-23 selective inhibitors. In addition, we delve into novel therapeutic strategies such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, miR-124 upregulators, anti-fractalkine (CX3CL1), anti-TL1A, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists, TGFBRI/ALK5 inhibitors, anti-CCR9 agents, and other innovative small molecules, as well as combination therapies. These emerging approaches, by addressing new pathways and mechanisms of action, have the potential to surpass the limitations of existing treatments and significantly improve CD management. However, the path to developing new therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is fraught with challenges, including complex trial designs, ethical concerns regarding placebo use, recruitment difficulties, and escalating costs. The landscape of IBD clinical trials is shifting toward greater inclusivity, improved patient diversity, and innovative trial designs, such as adaptive and Bayesian approaches, to address these challenges. By overcoming these obstacles, the drug development pipeline can advance more effective, accessible, and timely treatments for CD. Plain language summary: Crohn's disease: hope on the horizon with new therapies in development Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that affects millions of people worldwide. Many people with CD do not respond well to current treatments, and researchers are looking for new options. Clinical trials are research studies that test new drugs and treatments. They are carefully designed to protect the safety of participants. Several new approaches to treating CD are currently undergoing clinical trials. These include drug candidates in various stages of development, from early research to large-scale phase III trials. Cellular therapies are also being tested, involving the injection of cells locally or intravenously to promote healing. Crohn's disease (CD) is a long-term condition that causes inflammation in the digestive tract. It can be difficult to treat, as current medications don't always work for everyone, and some people experience side effects or stop responding to treatment over time. Even in clinical trials, where new treatments are tested, less than 60% of patients show positive responses. Researchers are working on new treatments that target different pathways involved in Crohn's disease. This review looks at drugs being tested in early to late-stage clinical trials. Some of these drugs target well-known pathways, like JAK inhibitors and IL-23 blockers, while others focus on newer areas, such as specific receptors or molecules involved in inflammation. These emerging therapies aim to provide better, longer-lasting relief for patients. However, developing new treatments isn't easy. Clinical trials for Crohn's disease face many challenges, including complicated trial designs, ethical concerns about using placebos, difficulties in recruiting enough patients, and high costs. To overcome these issues, researchers are exploring more flexible and inclusive trial methods, which could help bring new treatments to patients more quickly and efficiently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileo-anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) remains the preferred surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, complications like pouchitis can occur. This study aimed to describe patients who underwent IPAA for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at Padua Hospital from 2005 to 2023 and identify risk factors for pouchitis. Secondary objectives included evaluating the effectiveness of biological therapy in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP), Crohn's disease of the pouch (CDP), and Crohn's-like inflammation of the pouch (CDLPI), and assessing risk factors for pouch failure. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included 109 patients whose data were collected from medical records. Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze associations between preoperative and postoperative factors and outcomes such as acute pouchitis and pouch failure. The effectiveness of biological therapy was assessed by measuring changes in the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) and the Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) over a 12-month treatment period. Results: Univariate logistic regression revealed significant associations between preoperative extraintestinal manifestations (OR 3.569, 95% CI 1.240–10.720), previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease (OR 10.675, 95% CI 1.265–90.089), and transmural inflammation at cross-sectional imaging before surgery (OR 3.453, 95% CI 1.193–9.991) with an acute pouchitis risk. Pouch failure was significantly associated with a previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease (OR 9.500, 95% CI 1.821–49.571) and post-surgical fistulas (OR 41.597, 95% CI 4.022–430.172). Biological therapy led to a significant reduction in the PDAI score in patients with CARP, decreasing from a median of 10 to 4 (p = 0.006). Similarly, in patients with CDP or CDLPI, the mPDAI score was significantly reduced from a median of 9 to 1 (p = 0.034), with remission achieved in 5/6 (83.3%) of these patients. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the management of IPAA patients and highlights the importance of early identification and treatment of risk factors for pouchitis and failure. Biological therapy demonstrated significant effectiveness in reducing disease activity in patients with CARP, CDP, and CDLPI, suggesting its role as a crucial component in managing these complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The esophagus, traditionally viewed as a sterile conduit, is now recognized as a dynamic habitat for diverse microbial communities. The emerging evidence suggests that the esophageal microbiota plays an important role in maintaining esophageal health and contributing to disease. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the current knowledge on the esophageal microbiota composition, its variation between healthy individuals and those with esophageal diseases, and the potential mechanisms through which these microorganisms influence esophageal pathology. A systematic literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies published up to July 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed original research articles that used molecular techniques to characterize the esophageal microbiota in human subjects, comparing healthy individuals with patients affected by esophageal conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis, and esophageal cancer. The primary outcomes were the composition and diversity of the esophageal microbiota, and the secondary outcomes included the correlations between microbial profiles and disease states. The esophageal microbiota of healthy individuals was dominated by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly Streptococcus. Conversely, the esophageal microbiota is considerably altered in disease states, with decreased microbial diversity and specific microbial signatures associated with these conditions, which may serve as biomarkers for disease progression and as targets for therapeutic intervention. However, the heterogeneous study designs, populations, and analytical methods underscore the need for standardized approaches in future research. Understanding the esophageal microbiota's role in health and disease could guide microbiota-based diagnostics and treatments, offering novel avenues for managing esophageal conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Only limited real-life data on the long-term outcomes of CD patients treated with UST are available. This study assessed UST's long-term effectiveness and safety in a large population-based cohort of moderate to severe CD patients. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study that included both naïve and biologic-experienced patients treated with UST who achieved clinical remission or clinical response after at least one year of treatment. Clinical activity was scored according to the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI). The primary endpoints were the maintenance or achievement of clinical remission after a further 12-month period of treatment, defined as an HBI of ≤5, and safety. Other endpoints included steroid-free remission, mucosal healing (MH), steroid discontinuation, and the need for treatment optimization during the follow-up. Results: Out of 562 CD patients, after an overall 24-month follow-up, clinical remission was present in 450 (80.0%) patients, and at 12 months, clinical remission was observed in 417/437 (95.4%) patients; 33/125 (26.4%) showed clinical response at 12 months (p = 0.000). A total of 38/103 (36.9%) patients achieved MH. Only 2.1% (12/562), 3% (17/562), and 1.1% (6/562) of patients required surgery, optimization, and re-induction, respectively. Adverse events occurred in eight patients (1.42%). According to a multivariate analysis, the only predictor of long-term remission was the presence of remission at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.000). Conclusions: Long-term treatment with UST presents good efficacy and safety profiles in CD patients, especially for patients who achieve remission after one year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be a valuable strategy for optimizing biologic therapies, among which are anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In particular, reactive TDM has been shown to manage treatment failures more cost-effectively than empirical dose adjustments for anti-TNF drugs. However, several challenges currently impede the widespread adoption of TDM in clinical practice, particularly addressing the delay between sample collection and result availability. To overcome this limitation, the use of point-of-care technology tests (POCTs) is a potential solution. Point-of-care technology tests are medical diagnostic tests performed at the site of patient care to provide immediate results, allowing for quicker decision-making and treatment. The current standard of care (SOC) for drug level measurement relies on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a method that is time-consuming and requires specialized personnel. This study aims to evaluate a novel, user-friendly, and efficient POCT method (ProciseDx Inc.) and compare its performance with the SOC ELISA in assessing infliximab and adalimumab levels in blood samples from IBD patients. Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, we collected blood samples from IBD patients, both CD and UC, receiving infliximab (87 IBD patients; 50% UC and 50% CD) or adalimumab (60 patients; 14% UC and 48% CD) and we analyzed the blood's drugs levels using both the ProciseDx Analyzer POC and the SOC ELISA. We examined the correlation between the two methods using statistical analyses, including the Deming regression test. Additionally, we assessed the ease of use, turnaround time, and overall practicality of the POCT in a clinical setting. Results: The ProciseDx test demonstrated a strong correlation with the SOC ELISA for measuring both infliximab and adalimumab levels. In particular, the overall correlation between the ProciseDx POCT and the ELISA assessments showed an r coefficient of 0.83 with an R squared value of 0.691 (95% CI 0.717–0.902) for IFX measurements, and an r coefficient of 0.85 with an R squared value of 0.739 (95% CI 0.720–0.930). Conclusions: the ProciseDx POC test offers significantly faster turnaround times and is more straightforward to use, making it a viable alternative for routine clinical monitoring. Despite its promising potential, further refinement and validation of the ProciseDx test are necessary to ensure its effectiveness across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. Future research should focus on optimizing the POC tests' performance and evaluating its long-term impact on IBD management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Data on resilience, the ability to recover from adversity, in coeliac disease (CeD) are lacking. Aim. To assess the degree of resilience in patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet (GFD), and its association with clinical features, sociodemographic factors, psychological morbidity, and quality of life (QOL). Methods. A cross-sectional multicentre Italian study was conducted on adult CeD patients between May 2022 and April 2023. Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Coeliac Disease-specific Quality of Life Scale (CD-QOL), the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory scale (STAI-Y), and the Beck Depression Inventory scale (BDI) were used to evaluate resilience, QOL, anxiety, and depression, respectively. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with the degree of resilience. Results. A total of 305 patients (221 F, mean age at CeD diagnosis 36 ± 16 years) on a long-term GFD (median 8 years, IQR 3–17) were enrolled. A total of 298/305 patients (98%) had a high level of resilience (CD-RISC ≥ 35). At univariate analysis, resilience was statistically associated with male gender (p = 0.03), age at enrolment (p = 0.02), marital status (p = 0.03), QOL (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), and depression (p < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, trait anxiety (STAI-Y2, p < 0.001) and depression (BDI, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of lower levels of resilience. Conclusions. Higher trait anxiety predicts lower levels of resilience. Targeted interventions in this subgroup of patients may be helpful for their management and follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) have a peak incidence between the second and fourth decades of life and can affect women's reproductive life. Objectives: Our study aimed to assess the impact of IBD on the reproductive life of female patients with this condition. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Women with IBD followed at our IBD Unit and a group of healthy controls were enrolled. Data on reproductive life were collected using a dedicated questionnaire. Results: The study included 457 women, of whom 228 had IBD, and 229 age-matched healthy controls. No differences were found in the use of contraceptives, infertility, and endometriosis. The risk of spontaneous and voluntary abortions was significantly higher in IBD patients than in healthy controls [odds ratio (OR) 2 and 3.62, respectively]. The risk of obstetrical complications in the IBD population was more than six times higher in patients who experienced disease reactivations during pregnancy than in those with persistent remission [OR 6.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51–31.28]. Finally, we found that the chances of breastfeeding were 66% lower in patients with IBD than in controls (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.91). Conclusion: Our study underlines the negative impact of IBD on women's reproductive life, supporting the need for proactive preconception counseling. Plain language summary: Reproductive life in IBD women Summarise the established knowledge on this subject Most women with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases are affected during their reproductive years. Women with IBD have fear, uncertainty, and poor knowledge of how the disease can impact their reproductive life. What are the significant and/or new findings of this study? Higher prevalence of abortions in women with IBD. Confirmed adverse pregnancy outcomes in the case of IBD activity. A lower chance of breastfeeding in women with IBD. Pro-active counselling is needed, which start from the moment of conception choice, with correct management of the pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Celiac disease (CeD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder triggered by the ingestion of gluten, affecting around 1% of the global population. It is a multifactorial disease involving both genetics and environmental factors. Nowadays, the only available treatment for CeD is a life-long gluten-free diet (GFD), which can cause a significant burden for patients, since symptoms and mucosal injury can persist despite apparent compliance with a GFD. This could also lead to psychological consequences and affect the quality of life of these patients. Thankfully, recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of CeD and the availability of various targets have made it feasible to explore pharmaceutical treatments specific to CeD. Recently, the FDA has highlighted the unmet needs of adult patients on a GFD who experience ongoing symptoms attributed to CeD and also show persistent duodenal villous atrophy. This review will outline the limitations of a GFD, describe the targets of potential novel treatment of CeD and provide an overview of the primary clinical trials involving oral and injectable agents for a non-dietary treatment of CeD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most adverse reactions to food are patient self-reported and not based on validated tests but nevertheless lead to dietary restrictions, with patients believing that these restrictions will improve their symptoms and quality of life. We aimed to clarify the myths and reality of common food intolerances, giving clinicians a guide on diagnosing and treating these cases. We performed a narrative review of the latest evidence on the widespread food intolerances reported by our patients, giving indications on the clinical presentations, possible tests, and dietary suggestions, and underlining the myths and reality. While lactose intolerance and hereditary fructose intolerance are based on well-defined mechanisms and have validated diagnostic tests, non-coeliac gluten sensitivity and fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol (FODMAP) intolerance are mainly based on patients' reports. Others, like non-hereditary fructose, sorbitol, and histamine intolerance, still need more evidence and often cause unnecessary dietary restrictions. Finally, the main outcome of the present review is that the medical community should work to reduce the spread of unvalidated tests, the leading cause of the problematic management of our patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophageal chemical clearance has been evaluated with the post‐reflux swallow‐induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index. The factors triggering PSPW in Gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) have not yet been investigated. This multicenter study was aimed at evaluating the characteristics of reflux episodes associated with PSPW occurrence in patients with typical GERD symptoms. Methods: Impedance‐pH tracings from patients with typical reflux symptoms were analyzed. Sixteen healthy subjects were included for comparison. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of PSPW events. Key results: Impedance‐pH tracings from 60 patients and 16 healthy subjects were evaluated. A total of 3454 refluxes were recorded. In patients, comparing reflux episodes followed with those not followed by a PSPW, significantly higher proportions of acid (79% vs. 74%, p: 0.02), mixed (47% vs. 32%, p: 0.0001) and proximal refluxes (34% vs. 20%, p: 0.0001) were observed. A multivariate analysis, acid (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.05–1.6), mixed (OR: 2, 95% CI: 1.6–2.3), and proximal (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.7–2.5) refluxes were independently associated with PSPWs. Reflux episodes followed by a PSPW were characterized by a significantly higher bolus clearing time [(mean ± SD) 41 s ± 6 s vs. 30 s ± 5 s, p < 0.05] whereas nadir pH value of reflux events preceding PSPWs was tangentially but not significantly lower [(mean ± SD) 2.61 ± 1.22 vs. 2.74 ± 1.26, p: 0.057]. Conclusions and inferences: Acid, mixed and proximal refluxes, and their duration are key factors in eliciting PSPWs. PSPW represents a response to reflux directly related to the potential harmfulness of reflux contents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Crohn's disease (CD) is a complex, chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by unpredictable flare-ups and periods of remission. Despite advances in treatment, CD remains a significant health burden, leading to substantial direct healthcare costs and out-of-pocket expenses for patients, especially in the first-year post-diagnosis. The impact of CD on patients' quality of life is profound, with significant reductions in physical, emotional, and social well-being. Despite advancements in therapeutic options, including biologics, immunomodulators, and small molecules, many patients struggle to achieve or maintain remission, leading to a considerable therapeutic ceiling. This has led to an increased focus on novel and emerging treatments. This context underscores the importance of exploring advanced and innovative treatment options for managing refractory CD. By examining the latest approaches, including immunomodulators, combination therapies, stem cell therapies, and emerging treatments like fecal microbiota transplantation and dietary interventions, there is an opportunity to gain a comprehensive understanding of how best to address and manage refractory cases of CD., Competing Interests: Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino has served as speaker for Abbvie, Agave, AGPharma, Alfasigma, Aurora Pharma, CaDiGroup, Celltrion, Dr Falk, EG Stada Group, Fenix Pharma, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, JB Pharmaceuticals, Innovamedica/Adacyte, Malesci, MayolyBiohealth, Omega Pharma, Pfizer, Reckitt Benckiser, Sandoz, SILA, Sofar, Takeda, Tillots, Unifarco; has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Agave, Alfasigma, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, DiademaFarmaceutici, Dr. Falk, Fenix Pharma, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, JB Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Nestlè, Reckitt Benckiser, Regeneron, Sanofi, SILA, Sofar, Synformulas GmbH, Takeda, Unifarco; he received research support from Pfizer, Reckitt Benckiser, SILA, Sofar, Unifarco, Zeta Farmaceutici. Fabiana Zingone has served as a speaker for EG Stada Group, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Unifarco, Malesci, and Kedrion and has served as a consultant for Galapagos. Brigida Barberio has served as a speaker for Abbvie, Agave, Alfasigma, AGpharma, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sofar, Takeda, and Unifarco. Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino and Brigida Barberio are co-senior authors. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 Bertin et al.)

Background: There is no consensus on the recommended duration of and optimal time to stop azathioprine (AZA) therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Determining the optimal duration and cessation time can help to balance the risks of long-term intake with the possibility of relapse after cessation., Aim: To describe the events following AZA cessation., Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed to examine data from adult patients affected by IBD who were followed at the University of Padua and had started but then discontinued AZA between 1995 and 2022. Data on therapy duration, reasons for cessation, and type of relapse after cessation were collected. Cox regression models were used to estimate the risk of relapse in different subgroups., Results: A total of 133 ulcerative colitis patients and 141 Crohn's disease patients were included. Therapy with AZA was stopped in the 1 st year in approximately 34% of patients but was continued for more than 10 years in approximately 10% of cases. AZA discontinuation was due to primary failure or disease relapse in 30% of patients and due to disease remission in 25.2% of patients. Most of the remaining cases stopped AZA therapy due to side effects (primarily clinical intolerance, cytopenia, and pancreatic disease). Patients who stopped AZA for clinical remission had an 83% lower risk of relapse during the observation time than other groups, with a relapse-free rate of 89% after 1 year and 79% after 2 years., Conclusion: AZA administration is effective and safe, but it requires careful monitoring for potential minor and major side effects. Only 10% of patients who achieved remission with AZA needed a new treatment within 1 year of drug interruption., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)