Search

Background and Objectives: Computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT KUB) is essential for evaluating urinary stones but also exposes patients to significant radiation. The scanning field should be minimized to only the necessary area to limit this radiation exposure. This study aims to assess the extent of CT KUB overscanning in renal colic procedures and identify the appropriate vertebral level for starting CT KUB scans. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 299 adult patients who underwent CT KUB examinations for kidney stone assessment was performed. To assess overscanning, the number of excess slices above the pole of the highest kidney and under the pubic symphysis was measured on the axial image of each patient. To allow for potential human error, a maximum acceptable level of overscanning was set at 10%. Results: This study found that only 31% of the scans met the target of less than 10% of overscanning superior to the highest kidney and inferior to the pubic symphysis. In comparison, overscanning was present in 69% of the scans, mainly at a superior level, resulting in higher radiation exposure for patients. Conclusions: A significant number of the scans exhibited unnecessary overscanning beyond the highest kidney, prompting us to propose using the upper border of the T10 vertebral body as a potential reference point to establish the upper margin for a CT KUB scan. This study suggests using T10 and the pubic symphysis as reliable landmarks to accurately determine the scan length. Starting CT KUB scans from the T10 vertebral body to the pubic symphysis allows for imaging of the entire urinary tract, minimizing unnecessary overscanning and reducing patient irradiation.

Background and Objectives: The increasing use of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) examinations, also known as panCT, in emergency departments for trauma patients has raised concerns about potential overuse and the associated risk of unnecessary radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to examine the utilization patterns and findings of panCT scans performed over one year at a major academic hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 531 stable trauma adult patients who underwent panCT scans in 2023. De-identified data for each patient, including the radiology report, age, gender, and total dose-length product (DLP) of the panCT scan, were retrieved and reviewed. Radiology reports were classified based on the findings as negative (no acute traumatic injuries) or positive, with positive reports further subclassified based on injury location. Injury severity scores (ISS) were also calculated based on the findings of the radiology reports. Statistical analysis was performed using the Python programming language to assess any association between the independent variables (age and gender) and the dependent variable (report findings: negative or positive). Results: About 57% (n = 303) of the panCT scans included in the analysis were negative. The chi-squared test and logistic regression revealed a significant association between age and report finding (negative or positive), while no association with gender was found. One-third of positive cases (n = 72) had injuries only in the head and neck (H&N) region, and another one-third (n = 72) had injuries only in chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) region. Most cases (n = 373; 70%) had an ISS between 1 and 8, which is a mild score. Conclusions: This study showed a high rate of negative panCT scans, suggesting potential overuse of panCT. The study results highlight the need for more selective CT imaging approaches in emergency settings. Following evidence-based guidelines and decision-support tools could promote appropriate utilization of panCT scans, reducing unnecessary radiation exposure while ensuring that high-risk patients in emergency setting receive appropriate imaging.