4 results on '"Manuel Kleinert"'
Search Results
2. How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication
- Author
-
Nate Breznau, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Hung Hoang Viet Nguyen, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Esra Akdeniz, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik Kenneth Andersen, Daniel Auer, Flavio Azevedo, Oke Bahnsen, Ling Bai, Dave Balzer, Gerrit Bauer, Paul Bauer, Markus Baumann, Sharon Baute, Verena Benoit, Julian Bernauer, Carl Berning, Anna Berthold, Felix S. Bethke, Thomas Biegert, Katharina Blinzler, Johannes Blumenberg, Licia Bobzien, Andrea Bohman, Thijs Bol, Amie Bostic, Zuzanna Brzozowska, Katharina Burgdorf, Kaspar Burger, Kathrin Busch, Juan Carlos Castillo, Nathan Chan, Pablo Christmann, Roxanne Connelly, Christian S. Czymara, Elena Damian, Eline Adriane de Rooij, Alejandro Ecker, Achim Edelmann, Christina Eder, Maureen A. Eger, Simon Ellerbrock, Anna Forke, Andrea Gabriele Forster, Danilo Freire, Chris Gaasendam, Konstantin Gavras, Vernon Gayle, Theresa Gessler, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Godefroidt, Max Grömping, Martin Groß, Stefan Gruber, Tobias Gummer, Andreas Hadjar, Verena Halbherr, Jan Paul Heisig, Sebastian Hellmeier, Stefanie Heyne, Magdalena Hirsch, Mikael Hjerm, Oshrat Hochman, Jan H. Höffler, Andreas Hövermann, Sophia Hunger, Christian Hunkler, Nora Huth, Zsofia Ignacz, Sabine Israel, Laura Jacobs, Jannes Jacobsen, Bastian Jaeger, Sebastian Jungkunz, Nils Jungmann, Jennifer Kanjana, Mathias Kauff, Salman Khan, Sayak Khatua, Manuel Kleinert, Julia Klinger, Jan-Philipp Kolb, Marta Kolczynska, John Seungmin Kuk, Katharina Kunißen, Dafina Kurti Sinatra, Alexander Greinert, Robin C. Lee, Philipp M. Lersch, David Liu, Lea-Maria Löbel, Philipp Lutscher, Matthias Mader, Joan Eliel Madia, Natalia Malancu, Luis Maldonado, Helge Marahrens, Nicole Martin, Paul Martinez, Jochen Mayerl, OSCAR Jose MAYORGA, Robert Myles McDonnell, Patricia A. McManus, Kyle Wagner, Cecil Meeusen, Daniel Meierrieks, Jonathan Mellon, Friedolin Merhout, Samuel Merk, Daniel Meyer, Leticia Micheli, Jonathan J.B. Mijs, Cristóbal Moya, Marcel Neunhoeffer, Daniel Nüst, Olav Nygård, Fabian Ochsenfeld, Gunnar Otte, Anna Pechenkina, Mark Pickup, Christopher Prosser, Louis Raes, Kevin Ralston, Miguel Ramos, Frank Reichert, Arne Roets, Jonathan Rogers, Guido Ropers, Robin Samuel, Gergor Sand, Constanza Sanhueza Petrarca, Ariela Schachter, Merlin Schaeffer, David Schieferdecker, Elmar Schlueter, Katja Schmidt, Regine Schmidt, Alexander Schmidt-Catran, Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jürgen Schneider, Martijn Schoonvelde, Julia Schulte-Cloos, Sandy Schumann, Reinhard Schunck, Juergen Schupp, Julian Seuring, Henning Silber, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Nico Sonntag, Alexander Staudt, Nadia Steiber, Nils Steiner, Sebastian Sternberg, Dieter Stiers, Dragana Stojmenovska, Nora Storz, Erich Striessnig, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Jordan Suchow, Janna Teltemann, Andrey Tibajev, Brian B. Tung, Giacomo Vagni, Jasper Van Assche, Meta van der Linden, Jolanda van der Noll, Arno Van Hootegem, Stefan Vogtenhuber, Bogdan Voicu, Fieke Wagemans, Nadja Wehl, Hannah Werner, Brenton M. Wiernik, Fabian Winter, Christof Wolf, Cary Wu, Yuki Yamada, Björn Zakula, Nan Zhang, Conrad Ziller, Stefan Zins, and Tomasz Żółtak
- Subjects
Ecological validity ,media_common.quotation_subject ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Methodology ,Behavioural sciences ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Civic and Community Engagement ,Data science ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology ,Workflow ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies ,Replication (statistics) ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Code (cryptography) ,Key (cryptography) ,Quality (business) ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Sociology ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Political Sociology ,Reliability (statistics) ,media_common - Abstract
This paper reports findings from a crowdsourced replication. Eighty-five independent teams attempted a computational replication of results reported in an original study of policy preferences and immigration by fitting the same statistical models to the same data. The replication involved an experimental condition. Random assignment put participating teams into either the transparent group that received the original study and code, or the opaque group receiving only a methods section, rough results description and no code. The transparent group mostly verified the numerical results of the original study with the same sign and p-value threshold (95.7%), while the opaque group had less success (89.3%). Exact numerical reproductions to the second decimal place were far less common (76.9% and 48.1%), and the number of teams who verified at least 95% of all effects in all models they ran was 79.5% and 65.2% respectively. Therefore, the reliability we quantify depends on how reliability is defined, but most definitions suggest it would take a minimum of three independent replications to achieve reliability. Qualitative investigation of the teams’ workflows reveals many causes of error including mistakes and procedural variations. Although minor error across researchers is not surprising, we show this occurs where it is least expected in the case of computational reproduction. Even when we curate the results to boost ecological validity, the error remains large enough to undermine reliability between researchers to some extent. The presence of inter-researcher variability may explain some of the current “reliability crisis” in the social sciences because it may be undetected in all forms of research involving data analysis. The obvious implication of our study is more transparency. Broader implications are that researcher variability adds an additional meta-source of error that may not derive from conscious measurement or modeling decisions, and that replications cannot alone resolve this type of uncertainty.
- Published
- 2021
3. Abgehängt, fremdenfeindlich, oder einfach nur unzufrieden?
- Author
-
Manuel Kleinert
- Abstract
Die AfD und ihre Wahlerschaft sind in den letzten Jahren zu einem popularen Forschungsfeld der Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung geworden. Bisherige Studien beziehen sich dabei oft auf drei unterschiedliche theoretische Ansatze: a) okonomische Deprivation, b) fremdenfeindliche Einstellungen und c) politische Unzufriedenheit. Oftmals stehen diese jedoch unverbunden nebeneinander oder werden nur in ihrer Erklarungskraft miteinander verglichen. Das Ziel dieses Beitrages besteht darin, aus einer theorieintegrierenden Perspektive diese ausgewahlten Erklarungsansatze systematisch miteinander zu verknupfen und empirisch zu uberprufen. Dieses Vorgehen ermoglicht ein besonders umfassendes Verstandnis der individuellen Ursachen fur Sympathie mit der AfD, das neben direkten auch indirekte und moderierende Einflusse spezifiziert. Die Ergebnisse von mehreren Datensatzen zeigen, dass sich okonomische Deprivation nur in geringem Mase auf die Sympathie fur die AfD auswirkt, wohl aber xenophobe Einstellungen verstarkt, die sich wiederum stark auf die AfD-Sympathie auswirken. Politische Unzufriedenheit ist dabei ein wichtiger Moderator dieser Beziehung. Auserdem zeigt sich, dass die Methode der Theorieintegration eine wertvolle Erganzung zum parallelen Theorienvergleich sein kann.
- Published
- 2021
4. The Crowdsourced Replication Initiative: Investigating Immigration and Social Policy Preferences. Executive Report
- Author
-
Nate Breznau, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik Kenneth Andersen, Daniel Auer, Flavio Azevedo, Oke Bahnsen, Dave Balzer, Gerrit Bauer, Paul Bauer, Markus Baumann, Sharon Baute, Verena Benoit, Carl Berning, Julian Bernauer, Anna Berthold, Felix Bethke, Thomas Biegert, Katharina Blinzler, Johannes Blumenberg, Thijs Bol, Licia Bobzien, Andrea Bohman, Amie Bostic, Zuzanna Brzozowska, Katharina Burgdorf, Kaspar Burger, Kathrin Busch, Juan Carlos Castillo, Nathan Chan, Pablo Christmann, Roxanne Connelly, Christian S. Czymara, Elena Damian, Achim Edelmann, Alejandro Ecker, Maureen A. Eger, Simon Ellerbrock, Anna Forke, Andrea Gabriele Forster, Konstantin Gavras, Vernon Gayle, Chris Gaasendam, Theresa Gessler, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Godefroidt, Alexander Greinert, Martin Groß, Max Grömping, Stefan Gruber, Tobias Gummer, Andreas Hadjar, Jan Paul Heisig, Sebastian Hellmeier, Stefanie Heyne, Magdalena Hirsch, Mikael Hjerm, Oshrat Hochman, Jan H. Höffler, Andreas Hövermann, Nora Huth, Sophia Hunger, Christian Hunkler, Zsofia Ignacz, Laura Jacobs, Jannes Jacobsen, Bastian Jaeger, Sebastian Jungkunz, Nils Jungmann, Mathias Kauff, Manuel Kleinert, Julia Klinger, Jan-Philipp Kolb, Marta Kolczynska, John Kuk, Katharina Kunißen, Dafina Kurti, Philipp M. Lersch, Lea-Maria Löbel, Philipp Lutscher, Matthias Mader, Joan Eliel Madia, Natalia Cornelia Malancu, Luis Maldonado, Helge Marahrens, Nicole Martin, Paul Martinez, Jochen Mayerl, OSCAR Jose MAYORGA, Patricia A. McManus, Cecil Meeusen, Daniel Meierrieks, Jonathan Mellon, Friedolin Merhout, Samuel Merk, Daniel Meyer, Leticia Micheli, Jonathan Mijs, Cristóbal Moya, Marcel Neunhoeffer, Daniel Nüst, Olav Nygård, Fabian Ochsenfeld, Gunnar Otte, Anna Pechenkina, Christopher Prosser, Louis Raes, Kevin Ralston, Miguel Ramos, Arne Roets, Jonathan Rogers, Guido Ropers, Robin Samuel, Gergor Sand, Ariela Schachter, Merlin Schaeffer, David Schieferdecker, Elmar Schlueter, Katja Schmidt, Regine Schmidt, Alexander Schmidt-Catran, Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jürgen Schneider, Martijn Schoonvelde, Julia Schulte-Cloos, Sandy Schumann, Reinhard Schunck, Juergen Schupp, Julian Seuring, Henning Silber, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Nico Sonntag, Alexander Staudt, Nadia Steiber, Nils Steiner, Sebastian Sternberg, Dieter Stiers, Erich Striessnig, Dragana Stojmenovska, Nora Storz, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Janna Teltemann, Andrey Tibajev, Brian B. Tung, Giacomo Vagni, Jasper Van Assche, Meta van der Linden, Jolanda van der Noll, Arno Van Hootegem, Stefan Vogtenhuber, Bogdan Voicu, Fieke Maria Antoinet Wagemans, Kyle Wagner, Nadja Wehl, Hannah Werner, Brenton M. Wiernik, Fabian Winter, Christof Wolf, Yuki Yamada, Björn Zakula, Conrad Ziller, Stefan Zins, Nan Zhang, Tomasz Żółtak, and Hung Hoang Viet Nguyen
- Subjects
Open science ,Political Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Immigration ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Communication ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Crowdsourcing ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Political Science ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology ,Sociology ,Political science ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social Statistics ,Social statistics ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Communication ,Social policy ,media_common ,Social Statistics ,business.industry ,Communication ,Public relations ,Replication (computing) ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social Statistics ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology ,bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences ,business - Abstract
In an era of mass migration, social scientists, populist parties and social movements raise concerns over the future of immigration-destination societies. What impacts does this have on policy and social solidarity? Comparative cross-national research, relying mostly on secondary data, has findings in different directions. There is a threat of selective model reporting and lack of replicability. The heterogeneity of countries obscures attempts to clearly define data-generating models. P-hacking and HARKing lurk among standard research practices in this area.This project employs crowdsourcing to address these issues. It draws on replication, deliberation, meta-analysis and harnessing the power of many minds at once. The Crowdsourced Replication Initiative carries two main goals, (a) to better investigate the linkage between immigration and social policy preferences across countries, and (b) to develop crowdsourcing as a social science method. The Executive Report provides short reviews of the area of social policy preferences and immigration, and the methods and impetus behind crowdsourcing plus a description of the entire project. Three main areas of findings will appear in three papers, that are registered as PAPs or in process.
- Published
- 2019
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.