1. Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment
- Author
-
Ritu Salani, Allison M. Quick, Jhalak Dholakia, Mara K. Kaspers, Ashley S. Felix, and Elyse Llamocca
- Subjects
Adult ,Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander ,White People ,Article ,Odds ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ethnicity ,Odds Ratio ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Healthcare Disparities ,Minority Groups ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Proportional Hazards Models ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Endometrial cancer ,Uterus neoplasm ,Hazard ratio ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Hispanic or Latino ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Endometrial Neoplasms ,Black or African American ,Survival Rate ,Population study ,Pacific islanders ,Female ,Guideline Adherence ,business ,Carcinoma, Endometrioid ,Demography - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality. OBJECTIVE: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than White women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival. STUDY DESIGN: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n=66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic White (n=57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic Black (n=4,334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n=3,263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n=1,660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio=0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.86–0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio=0.90, 95% confidence interval=0.83–0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared to non-Hispanic White women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio=1.11, 95% confidence interval=1.00–1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio=1.12, 95% confidence interval=1.08–1.15), but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic Black (hazard ratio=1.09, 95% confidence interval=0.98–1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio=0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78–1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio=0.90, 95% confidence interval=0.70–1.16) women. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic White women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Further, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have impacted the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF