Search

Background and Aims: Objective monitoring and effective early treatment using a treat-to-target approach are key to improving therapeutic outcomes in IBD patients. This study aimed to assess adherence to objective monitoring (clinical, biomarkers, and endoscopy) and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective, multicenter study included consecutive IBD patients starting on adalimumab therapy between January 2019 and December 2020. Disease activity, assessed by the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), partial Mayo, C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FCAL), and endoscopy were evaluated at adalimumab initiation and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Therapeutic drug monitoring, changes in treatment, drug sustainability, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: 104 IBD patients were enrolled (78.8% CD, median age 34.3 years, disease duration 9 years). During the 12 months follow-up, high adherence to clinical activity assessment was observed in both CD (81.3%- 87.7%) and UC patients (76.5-90.9%). CRP measurement decreased over time in both CD (37.3%-54.9%) and UC (29.4%-50.0%). The adherence to serial FCAL monitoring was low in CD (22.7-31.3%) and UC patients (17.6-56.0%). UC patients had higher adherence to early endoscopic assessment (

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, which impacts the quality of life, work productivity and social activities of patients. Diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) is one of several subtypes, and accounts for approximately one third of all cases. Currently available treatments are typically unable to alleviate the cardinal symptoms of IBS-D, including abdominal pain and diarrhea, and a clinical unmet need remains for an effective treatment which simultaneously relieves multiple symptoms. Patients may benefit from a multipronged, individualized approach, including dietary modifications, and psychological and pharmacological therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the available and upcoming treatment options for IBS-D in Canada, with reference to the recently updated Canadian IBS consensus guidelines. Initial treatment approaches include lifestyle modifications, dietary modifications, and non-prescription therapies such as peppermint oil. While some medications such as tricyclic antidepressants are also used to treat IBS-D symptoms, eluxadoline and rifaximin are the only two pharmacological therapies approved for the treatment of IBS-D in Canada. Key clinical trial data for the currently available pharmacological options are presented to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of these agents

Background and Aims: This study assessed the efficacy of maintenance treatment with multimatrix mesalazine following achievement of complete or partial remission after induction treatment with high-dose multimatrix mesalazine. Methods: In this phase 3b/4, open-label, multicentre, prospective, single-arm study, patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis were treated with multimatrix mesalazine 4.8g/day once daily for 8 weeks [induction phase]. At Week 8, those who achieved complete or partial remission, based on predefined clinical and endoscopic criteria, were eligible to receive 12 months of multimatrix mesalazine 2.4g/day once daily maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in complete remission at Month 12. Results: A total of 717 patients received induction treatment; 25.9% and 39.3% of patients achieved complete and partial remission, respectively, at Week 8. A total of 461 patients entered the maintenance phase. The likelihood of remaining in/achieving complete remission at Month 12 was higher for patients who entered the maintenance phase in complete remission compared with those who began maintenance in partial remission [47.8% vs 26.0%; p < 0.001]. At Month 12, mucosal healing [endoscopy score ≤ 1] was demonstrated in 76.4% [139/182] and 63.5% [176/277] of those who were in complete and partial remission, respectively, at the end of induction. Conclusion: Patients achieving complete remission before dose reduction were more likely to remain in remission at Month 12.

The present paper is an update to and extension of the previous systematic review on the primary care management of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia (UD). The original publication of the clinical management tool focused on the initial four- to eight-week assessment of UD. This update is based on new data from systematic reviews and clinical trials relevant to UD. There is now direct clinical evidence supporting a test-and-treat approach in patients with nondominant heartburn dyspepsia symptoms, and head-to-head comparisons show that use of a proton pump inhibitor is superior to the use of H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in the initial treatment of Helicobacter pylori-negative dyspepsia patients. Cisapride is no longer available as a treatment option and evidence for other prokinetic agents is lacking. In patients with long-standing heartburn-dominant (ie, gastroesophageal reflux disease) and nonheartburn-dominant dyspepsia, a once-in-a-lifetime endoscopy is recommended. Endoscopy should also be considered in patients with new-onset dyspepsia that develops after the age of 50 years. Conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetylsalicylic acid and cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors can all cause dyspepsia. If their use cannot be discontinued, cotherapy with either a proton pump inhibitor, misoprostol or high-dose H2RAs is recommended, although the evidence is based on ulcer data and not dyspepsia data. In patients with nonheartburn-dominant dyspepsia, noninvasive testing for H pylori should be performed and treatment given if positive. When starting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for a prolonged course, testing and treatment with H2RAs are advised if patients have a history of previous ulcers or ulcer bleeding.

Aim : To investigate the efficacy of two omeprazole triple therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, ulcer healing and ulcer relapse during a 6-month treatment-free period in patients with active duodenal ulcer. Methods : This was a double-blind, randomized study in 15 centres across Canada. Patients (n = 149) were randomized to omeprazole 20 mg once daily (O) or one of two 1-week b.d. eradication regimens: omeprazole 20 mg, metronidazole 400 mg and clarithromycin 250 mg (OMC) or omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC). All patients were treated for three additional weeks with omeprazole 20 mg once daily. Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy after 4 weeks of study therapy. H. pylori eradication was determined by a 13C-urea breath test and histology, performed at pre-entry, at 4 weeks after the end of all therapy and at 6 months. Results : The intention-to-treat (intention-to-treat) analysis contained 146 patients and the per protocol (per protocol) analysis, 114 patients. The eradication rates were (intention-to-treat/per protocol): OMC—85% and 92%, OAC—78% and 87% and O—0% (O). Ulcer healing (intention-to-treat) was greater than 90% in all groups. The differences in the eradication and relapse rates between O vs. OMC and O vs. OAC were statistically significant (all, P

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) opened the doors to new insight and therapy for peptic ulcer disease. Earlier eradication treatment modalities based on bismuth compounds, with or without additional antimicrobials, were not well accepted mainly because of the, at least hypothetical, risks for neurological and/or renal side effects. The first proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, had been proven as a very effective short-term anti-ulcer therapy, but after withdrawal of the drug, the recurrence rate was high. theoretically, acid suppression was believed to increase the H. pylori infestation as the environment became more neutral. On the other hand, acid suppression could increase the effect of acid labile antimicrobials. This was not investigated before the studies presented in this thesis were performed.A small pilot study (Paper I) in 24 patients showed that 7 out of 8 patients treated for fourteen days with omeprazole 40 mg o.m. + amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d. were cleared of H. pylori, while it remained in 7/8 patients on omeprazole as monotherapy and in 2/7 patients on amoxicillin as monotherapy. However, the eradication rates 4 weeks after treatment were 5/8, 0/8 and 1/7 in the three groups, respectively. These results were confirmed in a large study (Paper II) comprising 248 consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer disease. All had an initial treatment period for two weeks with omeprazole 40 mg o.m., followed by continued omeprazole in combination with amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d. or amoxicillin placebo for a further two weeks. In the dual therapy group, 54% of patients were H. pylori eradicated compared to 4% in the omeprazole mono therapy group. Furthermore, the duodenal ulcer relapse rate was significantly lower in the combination group compared to the monotherapy group (p

Context Maintenance therapy for Crohn disease features the use of immunosuppressive drugs, which are associated with an increased risk of infection. Identification of safe and effective maintenance strategies is a priority. Objective To determine whether the oral administration of omega-3 free fatty acids is more effective than placebo for prevention of relapse of Crohn disease. Design, Setting, and Patients Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (Epanova Program in Crohn's Study 1 [EPIC-1] and EPIC-2) conducted between January 2003 and February 2007 at 98 centers in Canada, Europe, Israel, and the United States. Data from 363 and 375 patients with quiescent Crohn disease were evaluated in EPIC-1 and EPIC-2, respectively. Interventions Patients with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of less than 150 were randomly assigned to receive either 4 g/d of omega-3 free fatty acids or placebo for up to 58 weeks. No other treatments for Crohn disease were permitted. Main Outcome Measure Clinical relapse, as defined by a CDAI score of 150 points or greater and an increase of more than 70 points from the baseline value, or initiation of treatment for active Crohn disease. Results For EPIC-1, 188 patients were assigned to receive omega-3 free fatty acids and 186 patients to receive placebo. Corresponding numbers for EPIC-2 were 189 and 190 patients, respectively. The rate of relapse at 1 year in EPIC-1 was 31.6% in patients who received omega-3 free fatty acids and 35.7% in those who received placebo (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.19; P = .30). Corresponding values for EPIC-2 were 47.8% and 48.8% (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.21; P = .48). Serious adverse events were uncommon and mostly related to Crohn disease. Conclusion In these trials, treatment with omega-3 free fatty acids was not effective for the prevention of relapse in Crohn disease. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: EPIC-1: NCT00613197, EPIC-2: NCT00074542

Effects of octreotide (1.25 micrograms/kg subcutaneously) on colonic tone and visceral perception were evaluated in 10 IBS patients, using a barostat and compared to placebo in a double-blind crossover study. Colonic sensory thresholds were also studied in healthy controls for comparison with IBS patients. Colonic tone was reflected by variations in volume of the barostat balloon. Baseline volume was 117 +/- 38 ml and was not modified by placebo (122 +/- 40 ml) or octreotide (106 +/- 42 ml). After the meal, maximal decrease in balloon volume was 75 +/- 4% following placebo (P0.001) beginning after 9 +/- 3 min and lasting 136 +/- 17 min. Following octreotide, the maximal decrease was 69 +/- 16% (NS vs placebo), after 10 +/- 3 min and lasting 140 +/- 22 min. In the second part, discomfort and pain thresholds were evaluated during isobaric distensions (4 mm Hg increments, 5-min duration, 5-min interval with return to pressure 0 between each). The pressure inducing discomfort was 21.2 +/- 5.9 mm Hg following placebo vs 29.6 +/- 6.6 mm Hg following octreotide (P0.01). The pressure inducing pain was 24.8 +/- 7.3 mm Hg following placebo vs 33.2 +/- 7.3 mm Hg following octreotide (P0.01). In healthy subjects, discomfort and pain were induced by colonic distensions at a mean intraballoon pressure of 32.7 +/- 5.8 mm Hg and 36.7 +/- 3.9 mm Hg, respectively. Compliance curves were not different following placebo and octreotide. Octreotide significantly increases thresholds for visceral perception in IBS patients without modifying compliance during distension nor colonic tone.

To study the role of abnormal visceral perception in the pathophysiology of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), we evaluated colonic tone and visceral perception during intracolonic distension using a flaccid balloon connected to a computerized barostat and placed in the descending colon of IBS patients and healthy controls. In the first part of the study, basal colonic tone and response to pharmacological (neostigmine and glucagon) and physiological (1000-kcal meal) stimuli were recorded in nine IBS patients. Colonic tone increased by 72±27% after injection of neostigmine and decreased by 88±62% after glucagon. After the meal, the maximal increase in colonic tone was 76±31% with the total response to the meal lasting 109.7±32.0 min. In the second part of the study, symptomatic responses (discomfort and pain thresholds) and pressure variations were evaluated during two different methods of distension (stepwise and intermittent) in a randomized order in the nine IBS patients and six healthy controls. Each distension method was repeated twice in IBS patients to study reproducibility. In IBS patients, the mean discomfort threshold volume was 172±76 ml when using stepwise and 167±43 ml when using intermittent distension. The mean pain threshold volume was 250±25 ml when using stepwise and 211±22 ml when using intermittent distension, this difference being statistically significant (P

The symptoms of functional dyspepsia are still unexplained. To evaluate the possible role of abnormal visceral perception, we studied the symptomatic responses and the pressure variations during progressive gastric distension in 10 female healthy control subjects (mean age 33.6 years) and in 10 female patients with functional dyspepsia (mean age 35.2 years). A rubber balloon was positioned 4 cm below the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and inflated with progressively larger volumes of air by steps of 50 ml; pressures at the gastric fundus and at the LES were continuously recorded by perfused manometric catheters. Each subject was studied on two separate occasions after randomized double-blind administration of either placebo or 20 mg of domperidone. Symptomatic responses and the manometric data were analyzed at the time of the initial recognition of distension (bloating step) and at the time of reporting pain or up to a maximum of 700 ml of balloon inflation (pain or 700-ml step). On placebo, the volumes of gastric distension were more than two times lower in patients than in control subjects at the bloating step (185±32 ml vs 470±40 ml,P=0.001) and at the pain or 700-ml step (265±54 ml vs 600±34 ml,P