Search

The lack of multi-omics cancer datasets with extensive follow-up information hinders the identification of accurate biomarkers of clinical outcome. In this cohort study, we performed comprehensive genomic analyses on fresh-frozen samples from 348 patients affected by primary colon cancer, encompassing RNA, whole-exome, deep T cell receptor and 16S bacterial rRNA gene sequencing on tumor and matched healthy colon tissue, complemented with tumor whole-genome sequencing for further microbiome characterization. A type 1 helper T cell, cytotoxic, gene expression signature, called Immunologic Constant of Rejection, captured the presence of clonally expanded, tumor-enriched T cell clones and outperformed conventional prognostic molecular biomarkers, such as the consensus molecular subtype and the microsatellite instability classifications. Quantification of genetic immunoediting, defined as a lower number of neoantigens than expected, further refined its prognostic value. We identified a microbiome signature, driven by Ruminococcus bromii, associated with a favorable outcome. By combining microbiome signature and Immunologic Constant of Rejection, we developed and validated a composite score (mICRoScore), which identifies a group of patients with excellent survival probability. The publicly available multi-omics dataset provides a resource for better understanding colon cancer biology that could facilitate the discovery of personalized therapeutic approaches.

Purpose:No biomarker to personalize treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is currently available. We assessed in LARC whether a diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore (ISB) could predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (nT) and better define patients eligible to an organ preservation strategy (“Watch-and-Wait”).Experimental Design:Biopsies from two independent cohorts (n1 = 131, n2 = 118) of patients with LARC treated with nT followed by radical surgery were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified by digital pathology to determine ISB. The expression of immune-related genes post-nT was investigated (n = 64 patients). Results were correlated with response to nT and disease-free survival (DFS). The ISB prognostic performance was further assessed in a multicentric cohort (n = 73 patients) treated by Watch-and-Wait.Results:ISB positively correlated with the degree of histologic response (P < 0.001) and gene expression levels for Th1 orientation and cytotoxic immune response, post-nT (P = 0.006). ISB high identified patients at lower risk of relapse or death compared with ISB low [HR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.78; P = 0.009]. Prognostic performance of ISB for DFS was confirmed in a validation cohort. ISB was an independent parameter, more informative than pre- (P < 0.001) and post-nT (P < 0.05) imaging to predict DFS. ISB combined with imaging post-nT discriminated very good responders that could benefit from organ preservation strategy. In the “Watch-and-Wait” cohort (n = 73), no relapse was observed in patients with ISB high (23.3%).Conclusions:ISB predicts response to nT and survival in patients with LARC treated by surgery. Its usefulness in the selection of patients eligible for a Watch-and-Wait strategy is strongly suggested.

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Tables

AIM 90Y-radioembolization using glass or resin microspheres is increasingly used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the prognostic relevance of dosimetric parameters defined with 90Y-PET-CT obtained immediately after radioembolization. METHODS Forty-five HCC patients, mostly with multiple lesions, were treated by radioembolization between 2011 and 2017. After treatment, all underwent a 90Y PET-CT with time of flight reconstruction (90Y-TOF-PET-CT). Tumor absorbed dose and cumulative tumor dose-volume histogram were calculated using a dose point Kernel convolution algorithm. The radiological tumor response was assessed using modified (m)-RECIST criteria. Progression-free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were treated with glass microspheres (73 lesions) and nineteen with resin microspheres (60 lesions). Thresholds of 118 and 61 Gy for glass and resin microspheres respectively correlate well with radiological response with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 98 and 80% and discriminate patient outcome with regard to PFS (P = 0.03 and 0.005) and OS (P = 0.003 and 0.007). Using dose volume histogram, a minimal absorbed dose of 40 Gy in 66% of the tumor volume (defined as D66) was highly predictive of radiological response (PPV = 94%), PFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0. 008), for either device. CONCLUSION Dosimetric parameters obtained using 90Y-PET-CT are predictive of tumor response, PFS and OS. In clinical practice, a systematic dosimetric evaluation using 90Y PET should be implemented to help predicting patient outcomes.

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases combined with systemic treatment aims to maximize patient survival. However, recurrence rates are very high postsurgery. In order to assess patient prognosis after metastasis resection, we evaluated the main patho‐molecular and immune parameters of all surgical specimens. Two hundred twenty‐one patients who underwent, after different preoperative treatment, curative resection of 582 metastases were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters, RAS tumor mutation, and the consensus Immunoscore (I) were assessed for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and time to relapse (TTR) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log‐rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used for uni‐ and multivariate analysis. Immunoscore and clinicopathological parameters (number of metastases, surgical margin, histopathological growth pattern, and steatohepatitis) were associated with relapse in multivariate analysis. Overall, pathological score (PS) that combines relevant clinicopathological factors for relapse, and I, were prognostic for TTR (2‐year TTR rate PS 0–1: 49.8.% (95% CI: 42.2–58.8) versus PS 2–4: 20.9% (95% CI: 13.4–32.8), hazard ratio (HR) = 2.54 (95% CI: 1.82–3.53), p

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is poor. Cetuximab and panitumumab, 2 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), improve the overall survival of patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. However, not all patients with RAS wild-type mCRC will respond to anti-EGFR mAbs. Several retrospective trials suggest that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification could be a predictive biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs in patients with metastatic RAS and RAF wild-type mCRC. Dual HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab plus lapatinib or pertuzumab has shown promising preliminary anti-tumoral efficacy in RAS wild-type mCRC. Although these findings need to be confirmed in randomized trials, the data strongly support that HER2 is an actionable gene in CRC and provide the scientific rationale to test HER2 status on a routine basis in this disease. In this review, we discuss the predictive value of HER2 activation in CRC as well as its potential role as a treatment target.

Background While circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III colon cancer, no study has ever analysed the value of this biomarker in colon cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to fill this gap by using prospectively collected plasma samples from 80 stage III colon cancer patients, receiving one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX in the PePiTA trial. Material and Methods Samples were collected at baseline, 2 weeks and surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA, and analysed with ddPCR technology. ROC curves were applied for cut-off points, and outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS). Results After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, baseline circulating-free (cf) DNA was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.15-9.77, p = .03), and a trend towards a similar association was observed for relative cfDNA changes between baseline and surgery (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 0.94-7.05, p = .07). Among 60 ctDNA assessable patients, 25 (42%) had detectable ctDNA at baseline. While detection of ctDNA at any pre-operative timepoint was not associated with outcome, patients with ctDNA increase (change of the worst trending methylation marker >= 11%, or mean ctDNA change of NPY and WIF1 >= 0%) between baseline and surgery showed a trend towards worse 5-year DFS (HR 3.66, 95% CI: 0.81-16.44, p = .09). Conclusion This is the first study of ctDNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early-stage colon cancer. Results are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger series.

Retrospective studies reported that preoperative oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy increased pathological response (PR) in patients resected for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This multicenter prospective randomized (1/1) phase II trial evaluated PR on resected CRLM after preoperative mFOLFOX6 (arm A) or FOLFIRI (arm B) + bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response rate (MPRR), defined as the percentage of patients presenting CRLMs with mean tumor regression grade (TRG) < 3. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Out of 65 patients, 57 patients (28 and 29 in arm A/B) were resected for CRLM (one patient with lung metastases). Clinical and treatment characteristics were similar in both arms. One-month postoperative complications were 39.3%/31.0% in arm A/B (p = 0.585). MPRR and complete PR were 32.1%/20.7% (p = 0.379) and 14.3%/0.0% (p = 0.052) in arm A/B, respectively. PFS and OS were not different. Patients with PR among all CRLMs (max TRG ≤ 3; 43.8% of patients) had a lower risk of relapse (PFS: HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.204–0.840, p = 0.015) and a tendency towards better survival (OS: HR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.104–1.114, p = 0.075). The homogeneity of PR was associated with improved PFS/OS. This trial fails to demonstrate a significant increase in MPRR in patients treated with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab but confirms PR as an important prognostic factor.

Following initial success in melanoma and lung tumours, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now well recognized as a major immunotherapy treatment modality for multiple types of solid cancers. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the small subset that is mismatch-repair-deficient and microsatellite-instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) derive benefit from immunotherapy; however, the vast majority of patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) or with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC do not. Immunoscore and the consensus molecular subtype classifications are promising biomarkers in predicting therapeutic efficacy in selected CRC. In pMRR/MSS CRC, biomarkers are also needed to understand the molecular mechanisms governing immune reactivity and to predict their relationship to treatment. The continuous development of such biomarkers would offer new perspectives and more personalized treatments by targeting oncological options, including ICIs, which modify the tumour-immune microenvironment. In this review, we focus on CRC and discuss the current status of ICIs, the role of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy, and the approaches being explored to render pMMR/MSS CRC more immunogenic through the use of combined therapies.

Treatment outcomes have improved with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and small molecule inhibitors. However, many patients do not respond with single agents. Consequently, ongoing research is focused on the use of combination therapies to increase clinical efficacy by potential synergistic effects. Here, we outline ongoing trials and review the rationale and evidence for the combination of avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody (mAb), with cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) IgG1 mAb. Avelumab is approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, and in combination with axitinib for renal cell carcinoma; cetuximab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, and in combination with radiation therapy for SCCHN. Avelumab binds to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and immune regulatory cells, thus blocking its interaction with programmed death 1 and reventing T-cell suppression; cetuximab inhibits the EGFR signaling pathway, inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Both therapies have complementary mechanisms of action and may also activate the immune system to induce innate effector function through the binding of their Fc regions to natural killer (NK) cells. Furthermore, cetuximab combined with chemotherapy has been shown to induce immunogenic cell death and leads to an increase in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T and NK cells, which should synergize with the immunostimulatory effects of avelumab. Prospective studies will investigate this combination and inform future treatment strategies.

SCOPUS: le.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Protocol tittle: Study of BO-112 with pembrolizumab for colorectal or gastric/GEJ cancer with liver metastasis.Background: Gastric (GC), oesophagogastric junction (EGJC) and colorectal tumors (CRC) with microsatellite stability (MSS) are poorly responders to PD(L)-1 inhibition, due to low CD8+ T cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression. Therefore, modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) could increase disease control. In these tumors the presence of liver lesions is difficult to control because of the hepatic immune tolerance. Control of the hepatic disease could increase survival.BO-112 is a non-coding dsRNA agonist of TLR3, MDA5 and RIG-I which activates the innate and adaptative immune response, inducing apoptosis and immunogenic cell death, with a local and a systemic effect. A prior Phase I trial showed that the combination of pembrolizumab and intratumoral (IT) BO-112 has a good safety profile and encouraging activity. Study design: This is a single arm phase IIa trial to assess the efficacy of intrahepatic IT BO-112 and iv pembrolizumab in 3W cycles in patients with MSS CRC, GC or EGJ tumors. Up to 69 patients with at least one liver lesion and 2 prior lines for CRC and 1 for GC/EGJC will be enrolled. Primary endpoints: ORR and related TEAEs ≥ grade 3. Secondary endpoints: ORR (iRECIST), PFS, 6-months OS and safety. Exploratory endpoint: Changes in TME (PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration) from baseline to C2D1.Results: A total of 11 CRC and 7 GC/EGJC patients were enrolled since July 2020. This abstract focuses on the CRC patients´ biomarker expression. These patients had low PD-L1 CPS (combined positive score) expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration with a median value of 5 and 4%, respectively, in the TME at baseline. Following two IT BO-112 injections, an important increase in PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration was observed in 5 and 7 patients, respectively. PD-L1 CPS median value increased to 37.9 while CD8+ T cell infiltration median values raised to 12.9%.Conclusions: A meaningful increase in PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration was achieved in MSS CRC patients after one cycle of BO-112-pembrolizumab. Table 1.Baseline characteristics and TME changesBaseline characteristicsCRC N=11Demographics-Sex-Male-Female-Age (mean, range)7 (63.6%)4 (36.4%)55 (38-74)Location of primary tumor-Right colon-Left colon2 (36.4%)7 (63.6%)Presence of extrahepatic disease-No-YesLocation of the extrahepatic disease-Lungs-Lymph nodes-Ohers (bone, adrenal gland, peritoneum, pancreas)2 (18.2%)9 (81.8%)6 (54.5%)5 (45.5%)1 (9.1%)Molecular characteristics:-MMR status-MSS-KRAS-Wild type-Mutant -PD-L1-CPS Citation Format: Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé, Elena Élez, Andrés Muñoz, Marc Van den Eynde, Antonio Gaetano Rampoldi, Alain Hendlisz, Hans Prenen, Mercedes Rodríguez, María Teresa Cano, Marya Chaney, Helena Escuin, Vanesa Pons, Marisol Quintero, Andrés Cervantes. Phase IIa open-label clinical study of intratumoural administration of BO-112 in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer or gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT192.

Background The viral pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted cancer patient management around the world. Most reported data relate to incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe COVID-19. The safety of systemic anti-cancer therapy in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19 is unknown.Methods ONCOSARS-1 was a prospective, single-center, academic observational study. Adult patients with solid tumors treated in the oncology day unit with systemic anti-cancer therapy during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium were included. All patients (n=363) underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological testing after the peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Additionally, 141 of these patients also had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test during the pandemic. The main objective was to determine the safety of systemic cancer treatment, measured by the rate of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients.Results Twenty-two (6%) of the 363 eligible patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or serology. Of these, three required transient oxygen supplementation, but none required admission to the intensive care unit. Hematotoxicity was the only adverse event more frequently observed in SARS-CoV-2 -positive patients than in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients: 73% vs 35% (PP=0.009) even after adjusting for performance status and type of systemic treatment. Hematological adverse events led to more treatment delays for the SARS-CoV-2-positive group: 55% vs 20% (PConclusion Systemic anti-cancer therapy appeared safe in ambulatory oncology patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were, however, more treatment delays in the SARS-CoV-2-positive population, mainly due to a higher rate of hematological adverse events.

Summary Background VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1–5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117. Findings Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607–0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5–6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5–5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768–1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801–1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9–11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5–11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1). Interpretation Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

BackgroundNew and fully validated tests need to be brought into clinical practice to improve the estimation of recurrence risk in patients with colon cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the analytical performances of the Immunoscore (IS) and show its contribution to prognosis prediction.MethodsImmunohistochemical staining of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells on adjacent sections of colon cancer tissues were quantified in the core of the tumor and its invasive margin with dedicated IS modules integrated into digital pathology software. Staining intensity across samples collected between 1989 and 2016 (n=595) was measured. The accuracy of the IS workflow was established by comparing optical and automatic counts. Analytical precision of the IS was evaluated within individual tumor block on distant sections and between eligible blocks. The IS interlaboratory reproducibility (n=100) and overall assay precision were assessed (n=3). Contribution of the IS to prediction of recurrence based on clinical and molecular parameters was determined (n=538).ResultsOptical and automatic counts for CD3+ or CD8+ were strongly correlated (r=0.94, pConclusionIS is a robust and validated clinical assay leveraging immune scoring to predict recurrence risk of patient with localized colon cancer. The strong and independent prognostic value of IS should pave the way for it use in clinical practice.

3596 Background: Surgical resection of CRLM aims to maximize patient survival. However, recurrence rates remain high post-surgery. We previously reported the prognostic relevance of tumor regression grading (TRG) and HGP of resected CRLM. Several studies reported the association of tumoral heterogeneity with anti-cancer drug resistance and prognosis. This study aims to explore tumoral heterogeneity for TRG and HGP in patients resected for CRLM and its prognostic implication. Methods: Tumor homogeneity for PR and HGP was evaluated in 2 independent cohorts. Cohort 1 included 57 patients (159 CRLMs) resected after chemotherapy/bevacizumab (prospective BEV-ONCO trial). Cohort 2 included 221 patients (582 CRLMs) operated after preoperative treatment or not. TRG (1 to 5 according complete to no response), HGP (desmoplastic, pushing, replacement or mixed) were evaluated for each CRLM. Max-TRG (higher TRG among all the CRLM) was used to define PR. Homogenous TRG (TRG-h) and HGP (HGP-h) was defined when all CRLMs had the same TRG or HGP pattern. HGP homogeneous desmoplastic (HGP-hd) was defined when all CRLM had a desmoplastic HGP. TRG-h, HGP-h and HGP-hd were combined into a homogeneity score (H-score: 0 to 3, 1 point given for each parameter and summed-up). Overall survival (OS for both cohorts), progression-free survival (PFS for cohort 1) and time to relapse (TTR for cohort 2) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Patient and disease characteristics were comparable in both cohorts excepted for preoperative treatment. In cohort 1, TRG-h and HGP-h were significantly associated with a longer PFS (HR = 0.21; 95CI:0.10-0.43, p < 0.001; HR = 0.27; 95CI = 0.14-0.54, p < 0.001) and better OS (HR = 0.23; 95CI = 0.07-0.70, p = 0.010; HR = 0.32; 95CI = 0.10-0.93, p = 0.037). Interestingly, the same significant results were observed in cohort 2 for TTR (TRG-h: HR = 0.60; 95CI = 0.43-0.85, p = 0.004; HGP-h: HR = 0.68; 95CI = 0.49-0.94, p = 0.017) and OS (TRG-h: HR = 0.51;95CI = 0.33-0.80, p = 0.003; HGP-h: HR = 0.63; 95CI = 0.41-0.97, p = 0.034). HGP-h reported a significant association with TRG-h, a Max-TRG < = 3, the absence of HGP replacement and mixed, a desmoplastic pattern, and the absence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in both cohorts. H-score was significantly associated with TTR (score 1-2: HR = 0.57; 95CI = 0.38-0.85, p = 0.004; score 3: HR = 0.4; 95CI = 0.24-0.64, p < 0.001) and OS (score 3: HR = 0.31; 95CI = 0.15-0.64, p < 0.001) in univariate analysis and with OS (HR = 0.74; 95CI = 0.59-0.94, p = 0.011) in multivariate analysis (cohort 2). Conclusions: TRG-h and HGP-h are strongly associated with patient’s survival. H-score could be an easy morphological and prognostic score to assess. Validation studies are needed.

3595 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated poor efficacy in MSS mCRC. Cetuximab (anti-EGFR inhibitor) could initiate, independently from RAS mutation, an immunogenic tumor cell death and mediate antitumor immune response. In this trial, we aim to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of avelumab (anti-PDL1) combined with cetuximab and irinotecan for treatment refractory MSS mCRC and to understand its mechanisms of action through associated translational research. Methods: AVETUXIRI trial (NCT03608046) enrols MSS, chemorefractory (fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and anti-EGFR treatment if RAS wt tumor) mCRC patients in 2 cohorts (A: RAS-wt, n = 10 – B: RAS-mut, n = 13). Primary endpoints are safety and tumor response rate ((i)RECIST1.1). Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). According to a Simon 2-stage design, 23 patients have been included in the first stage of the trial. Multiplex immunofluorescence and RNA sequencing were realized on metastasis biopsies performed before, during and after the treatment. Densities of CD3+ (T cells) and CD8+ (cytotoxic) were quantified and analyzed with to generate an immunoscore (IS). RNA-seq data was used to perform differential expression analysis (DESeq2), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), deconvolution analysis (ConsensusTME) and gene ontology analysis (GO). Results:: No unexpected safety signals were observed. 3/10 tumor responses were observed in cohort A, 0/13 in cohort B. DCR was 60.0% and 61.5% in cohort A and B, respectively. 6-months PFS and 12-months OS rates were respectively 40.0% and 50.0% (cohort A) and 38.5% and 46.2% (cohort B). Independently of RAS mutation, patients with a high IS (metastasis biopsy, baseline) had significantly higher tumor shrinkage (OR = 18.67 p = 0.019), median PFS (6.9 vs 3.4 months; HR = 0.16, p = 0.002) and median OS (13.7 vs 7.9 months, HR = 0.26, p = 0.009). Similarly, tumor shrinkage and survival outcome (PFS > 6 months, OS > 12 months) were associated with upregulation of an adaptive immune response signature (including Th1, chemokine, adhesion molecules, immune checkpoints and T-cell activation genes, p. adj = 0.009) and the GSEA hallmark of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (p. adj = 0.045). Few modifications of IS and gene expression profiles were observed on the different metastasis biopsies performed overtime in the included patients. Conclusions: AVETUXIRI met its preliminary primary efficacy endpoint for RAS-wt mCRC pts, justifying its current continuation. Encouraging survival data observed in RAS-mut cohort allow the opening of a new cohort (PFS as primary endpoint). IS and adaptive immune response signature evaluated on metastases biopsies were associated with treatment efficacy and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03608046.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are well recognized as a major immune treatment modality for multiple types of solid cancers. However, for colorectal cancer (CRC), ICIs are only approved for the treatment of Mismatch-Repair-Deficient and Microsatellite Instability-High (dMMR/MSI-H) tumors. For the vast majority of CRC, that are not dMMR/MSI-H, ICIs alone provide limited to no clinical benefit. This discrepancy of response between CRC and other solid cancers suggests that CRC may be inherently resistant to ICIs alone. In translational research, efforts are underway to thoroughly characterize the immune microenvironment of CRC to better understand the mechanisms behind this resistance and to find new biomarkers of response. In the clinic, trials are being set up to study biomarkers along with treatments targeting newly discovered immune checkpoint molecules or treatments combining ICIs with other existing therapies to improve response in MSS CRC. In this review, we will focus on the characteristics of response and resistance to ICIs in CRC, and discuss promising biomarkers studied in recent clinical trials combining ICIs with other therapies.

TPS226 Background: Despite recent improvements, management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains challenging, and many patients (pts) still experience recurrence. In preclinical models, combining Rego with an anti-PD-1 inhibitor led to superior tumour growth suppression as compared with either treatment alone. In a phase I clinical trial, remarkable results were reported for the combination of Rego and Nivo in advanced MSS colorectal cancer. This synergistic effect is thought to be secondary to the anti-angiogenic effects of Rego and its potential to reduce TAMs, promote M1 macrophage conversion, and down-regulate expression of immunosuppressive factors. Building on these data, we designed a trial of Rego-Nivo with standard SCRT in the neoadjuvant setting of RC. Methods: REGINA is an academic, multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial sponsored by Institut Jules Bordet. Eligible patients are treated according to the following plan: induction phase (Nivo 240 mg IV D1&15, and Rego 80 mg PO D1-14), SCRT (D22-26), consolidation phase (Nivo 240 mg IV D29,43&57, and Rego 80 mg PO D29-49), and surgery (7-8 weeks after SCRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, ECOG PS ≤1, adenocarcinomas below the peritoneal reflection, intermediate-risk, stage II-III tumour (ie, cT3/T4aNany or cT1-2N+, no involvement/threatening of the mesorectal fascia, no involvement of lateral pelvic lymph nodes) irrespective of microsatellite instability status. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints include, among others, toxicity, compliance to treatment, pathological tumour regression grade, event-free survival, and overall survival. Subjects will be followed for recurrence and survival for 5 years after end of treatment visit. The study follows a Simon’s two-stage design (null hypothesis pCR = 12%, alternative hypothesis pCR = 24%; α= 5%, β= 20%) with a maximum of 60 pts to be enrolled. A safety interim analysis is planned after the first 6 pts have completed treatment. Serial collection of tumour, blood, and stool samples is mandatory at pre-specified time points for exploratory correlative biomarker analyses. The trial is planned to be run at 8-10 centres across Belgium. Study recruitment started in Q1 2021 and is anticipated to complete in Q3 2023. The study is funded by Bayer. Clinical trial information: NCT04503694.

TPS3620 Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody–drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody (trastuzumab) linked to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor (DXd). T-DXd has been approved to treat HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (United States, Japan, Europe) and advanced gastric cancer (United States, Japan). It is currently being evaluated in other solid tumor types including colorectal cancer. The phase 2 DESTINY-CRC01 study included patients with RAS wild-type mCRC, with median 4 (range, 2-11) prior lines of therapy. Preliminary results in patients with HER2-overexpressing (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) mCRC showed T-DXd treatment (6.4 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 3 weeks [Q3W]) resulted in a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 45.3% (24/53; 95% CI, 31.6%-59.6%) and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.1 months-not evaluable; Siena J Clin Oncol. 2020;38[15]:4000). Activity was also seen in patients treated with prior anti-HER2 therapy. Although 5.4-mg/kg and 6.4-mg/kg doses of T-DXd have shown clinical efficacy in multiple cancer indications, the lower dose has not yet been tested in patients with HER2-overexpressing mCRC. Preliminary data also suggest T-DXd may be active in RAS mutant mCRC, unlike other anti-HER2 therapies. The DESTINY-CRC02 study aims to determine efficacy and safety of T-DXd in patients with HER2-overexpressing, RAS wild-type or mutant mCRC at 5.4-mg/kg and 6.4-mg/kg doses. Methods: DESTINY-CRC02 (NCT04744831) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel phase 2 study that will be conducted in 2 stages. Eligible patients (≥18 years; ≥20 years in Japan, Taiwan, and Korea) will have HER2-overexpressing (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic CRC and have previously received chemotherapy, anti-EGFR therapy, anti-VEGF treatment, and/or anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, as clinically indicated. Prior anti-HER2 therapy will be allowed. In stage 1, patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive T-DXd IV Q3W at a dose of 5.4 mg/kg (n = 40; arm 1) or 6.4 mg/kg (n = 40; arm 2). Randomization will be stratified by ECOG PS (0 or 1), HER2 status (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+), and RAS status (wild-type or mutant). After stage 1 enrollment is complete, eligible patients in stage 2 (n = 40) will receive T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg until disease progression or other treatment discontinuation criteria are met. The study is actively enrolling and aims to enroll 120 patients across 60 sites. The primary objective is to assess efficacy of T-DXd at the 5.4-mg/kg and 6.4-mg/kg doses, with a primary end point of confirmed ORR by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points include investigator-assessed ORR, PFS, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT04744831.

Purpose: No biomarker to personalize treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is currently available. We assessed in LARC whether a diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore (ISB) could predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (nT) and better define patients eligible to an organ preservation strategy (“Watch-and-Wait”). Experimental Design: Biopsies from two independent cohorts (n1 = 131, n2 = 118) of patients with LARC treated with nT followed by radical surgery were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified by digital pathology to determine ISB. The expression of immune-related genes post-nT was investigated (n = 64 patients). Results were correlated with response to nT and disease-free survival (DFS). The ISB prognostic performance was further assessed in a multicentric cohort (n = 73 patients) treated by Watch-and-Wait. Results: ISB positively correlated with the degree of histologic response (P < 0.001) and gene expression levels for Th1 orientation and cytotoxic immune response, post-nT (P = 0.006). ISB high identified patients at lower risk of relapse or death compared with ISB low [HR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.78; P = 0.009]. Prognostic performance of ISB for DFS was confirmed in a validation cohort. ISB was an independent parameter, more informative than pre- (P < 0.001) and post-nT (P < 0.05) imaging to predict DFS. ISB combined with imaging post-nT discriminated very good responders that could benefit from organ preservation strategy. In the “Watch-and-Wait” cohort (n = 73), no relapse was observed in patients with ISB high (23.3%). Conclusions: ISB predicts response to nT and survival in patients with LARC treated by surgery. Its usefulness in the selection of patients eligible for a Watch-and-Wait strategy is strongly suggested.

The consensus Immunoscore is a routine assay quantifying the adaptive immune response within the tumor microenvironment. Its evaluation in the primary tumor of patients with stages I/II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) has prognostic value that has been confirmed in multiple studies. For metastatic patients, the evaluation of the consensus Immunoscore within resected metastases also significantly predicts the recurrence and survival of Stage IV patients. Since recurrence rates post-surgery are still very high, it is important to best evaluate risk parameters using the main patho-molecular and immune parameters. After preoperative treatment and curative resection of 582 metastases from 221 patients, clinico-pathological parameters, RAS mutation, and Immunoscore within metastases were assessed. Immunoscore and clinico-pathological parameters (number of metastases, surgical margin, histopathological growth pattern, and steatohepatitis) were associated with relapse in multivariable analysis. A Pathological Score (PS) that combines relevant clinico-pathological factors for relapse and Immunoscore was significantly (P

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of Immunoscore in patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) and to analyze its association with the effect of chemotherapy on time to recurrence (TTR). METHODS An international study led by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer evaluated the predefined consensus Immunoscore in 763 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage III CC from cohort 1 (Canada/United States) and cohort 2 (Europe/Asia). CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte densities were quantified in the tumor and invasive margin by digital pathology. The primary end point was TTR. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) status, and predictive value of efficacy of chemotherapy. RESULTS Patients with a high Immunoscore presented with the lowest risk of recurrence, in both cohorts. Recurrence-free rates at 3 years were 56.9% (95% CI, 50.3% to 64.4%), 65.9% (95% CI, 60.8% to 71.4%), and 76.4% (95% CI, 69.3% to 84.3%) in patients with low, intermediate, and high immunoscores, respectively (hazard ratio [HR; high v low], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.71; P = .0003). Patients with high Immunoscore showed significant association with prolonged TTR, OS, and DFS (all P < .001). In Cox multivariable analysis stratified by participating center, Immunoscore association with TTR was independent (HR [high v low], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.67; P = .0003) of patient’s sex, T stage, N stage, sidedness, and microsatellite instability status. Significant association of a high Immunoscore with prolonged TTR was also found among MSS patients (HR [high v low], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.62; P = .0003). Immunoscore had the strongest contribution χ2 proportion for influencing survival (TTR and OS). Chemotherapy was significantly associated with survival in the high-Immunoscore group for both low-risk (HR [chemotherapy v no chemotherapy], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.71; P = .0011) and high-risk (HR [chemotherapy v no chemotherapy], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77; P = .0015) patients, in contrast to the low-Immunoscore group ( P > .12). CONCLUSION This study shows that a high Immunoscore significantly associated with prolonged survival in stage III CC. Our findings suggest that patients with a high Immunoscore will benefit the most from chemotherapy in terms of recurrence risk.

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is based upon the assumption that metastases are homogeneous within a patient. A comprehensive analysis of all metastases of each patient revealed the heterogeneity of the colorectal metastatic disease and its clinical impact. Complex tumor-immune interrelations shape the metastatic landscape. Adaptive immune cells and Immunoscore quantified in a random metastatic biopsy predict clinical outcome and their evaluation in the tumor microenvironment of the least infiltrated metastasis most accurately predict long-term survival. The adaptive immune cell infiltration was more informative than tumor regression and pathological response to predict long-term survival. These results highlight the clinical utility of Immunoscore for patient management. The immune response within the tumor microenvironment is an essential diagnostic criterion for colorectal cancer that has recently been integrated into the international WHO classification of Digestive System Tumors.

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells (CAR-Ts) are an exciting new cancer treatment modality exemplified by the recent regulatory approval of two CD19-targeted CAR-T therapies for certain B cell malignancies. However, this success in the hematological setting has yet to translate to a significant level of objective clinical responses in the solid tumor setting. The reason for this lack of translation undoubtedly lies in the substantial challenges raised by solid tumors to all therapies, including CAR-T, that differ from B cell malignancies. For instance, intravenously infused CAR-Ts are likely to make rapid contact with cancerous B cells since both tend to reside in the same vascular compartments within the body. By contrast, solid cancers tend to form discrete tumor masses with an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment composed of tumor cells and non-tumor stromal cells served by abnormal vasculature that restricts lymphocyte infiltration and suppresses immune function, expansion, and persistence. Moreover, the paucity of uniquely and homogeneously expressed tumor antigens and inherent plasticity of cancer cells provide major challenges to the specificity, potency, and overall effectiveness of CAR-T therapies. This review focuses on the major preclinical and clinical strategies currently being pursued to tackle these challenges in order to drive the success of CAR-T therapy against solid tumors., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Introduction Circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III CC treated with surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. No study, however, has ever analysed the prognostic value of this biomarker in CC patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and early, on-treatment changes of cfDNA and ctDNA in stage II-III CC pts who were treated with one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy in the PePiTA trial. Methods PePITA was a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II trial aiming to test in vivo tumour chemosensitivity as assessd by metabolic response using 18F-FDG PET/CT scan of early stage CC and to evaluate its association with survival outcome (NCT00994864). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline and 2 weeks (ie, after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy). cfDNA was isolated with the QIAmp circulating nucleic acid kit (Qiagen), and quantified with the Qubit fluorometer (Life-Technologies). cfDNA samples were bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research), with NPY and WIF1 being selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA and analysed with digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Data from ddPCR were processed with the QuantaSoft V1.6 software (BioRad). The primary outcome measure was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses, Kaplan-Meier method, cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used. Statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS for MacOS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc). Results 80 pts were included (ypStage I-II 56%, ypStage III 44%). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 3-year DFS was 80% (95%CI 71.2-90.8) and 5-year OS 84% (95%CI 75.2-94.9). Pts with high (≥1.2 ng/µl) baseline cfDNA level had worse 3-year DFS (48% vs 80%; HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.02-7.25; p=0.036) and 5-year OS (71% vs 90%; HR 5.36, 95%CI 1.14-25.28; p=0.017) than those with low baseline cfDNA level. In a multivariable analysis (including sex, ypStage and CEA), baseline cfDNA was the only factor showing a trend towards statistical significance (HR DFS 2.6, 95%CI 0.96-7.01; p=0.059; HR OS 4.65, 95%CI 0.97-22.32; p=0.055). Early changes of cfDNA (Δ ≥11%) after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy failed to predict survival (HR DFS 1.08, 95%CI 0.42-2.81; p=0.873; HR OS 0.68, 95%CI 0.19-2.39; p=0.543). ctDNA analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions For the first time, we have shown that baseline cfDNA may predict survival outcome in early stage CC pts treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pending confirmation in larger series, testing for cfDNA at baseline could help select high-risk pts who may benefit from neoadjuvant, FOXTROT-like, treatment strategies. Citation Format: Giacomo Bregni, Elena Trevisi, Chiara Senti, Andrea Pretta, Caroline Vandeputte, Pashalina Kehagias, Elena Acedo Reina, Amélie Deleporte, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Philippe Vergauwe, Marc Van den Eynde, Guido Deboever, Jos Janssens, Gauthier Demolin, Stephane Holbrechts, Marylene Clausse, Thierry De Grez, Marc Peeters, Lionel D'Hondt, Karen Geboes, Tatiana Besse-Hammer, Alexis Buggenhout, Françoise Rothé, Patrick Flamen, Alain Hendlisz, Francesco Sclafani. Prognostic value of baseline and early changes of circulating cell-free (cf)DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer (CC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 28.

3600 Background: ctDNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III CC treated with surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). No study, however, has ever analysed the prognostic value of this biomarker in CC patients (pts) treated with NACT. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and early changes of cf/ctDNA in stage II-III CC pts who were treated with one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX CT in the PePiTA trial. Methods: PePiTA was a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II trial testing in vivo tumour chemosensitivity of early stage CC (as assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT-based metabolic response to one cycle of NA FOLFOX) and its association with long-term outcome (NCT00994864). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline, 2 weeks after one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT, and before surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA and analysed with digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Data from ddPCR were processed with the QuantaSoft v1.6 software (Bio-Rad). Survival outcome measures were 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS). ROC curve analyses, Kaplan-Meier method, cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS v25.0 (SPSS Inc.). Results: 80 pts were included (44 ypStage I-II and 36 ypStage III). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 5-year DFS and 6-year OS were 68% (95%CI 52-84) and 84% (95%CI 74-94), respectively. Pts with high (≥1600 ng/ml) baseline cfDNA had worse 6-year OS (HR 6.45, 95%CI 1.61-25.84; p = 0.008). Early changes of cfDNA after one cycle of NA FOLFOX CT failed to predict survival (HR DFS 0.96, 95%CI 0.38-2.43; p = 0.92; HR OS 0.62, 95%CI 0.16-2.50; p = 0.50). At baseline, 25 out of 60 (42%) ctDNA-assessable patients were positive. Detectable ctDNA at baseline (HR DFS 2.06, 95%CI 0.65-6.49; p = 0.22; HR OS 3.11, 95%CI 0.57-16.99; p = 0.19) or at any timepoint before surgery (HR DFS 1.65, 95%CI 0.54-5.04; p = 0.38; HR OS 2.80, 95%CI 0.54-14.44; p = 0.22) was not significantly associated with survival. A trend toward a significant association between ctDNA increase at surgery and 5-year DFS was found (HR 3.66, 95%CI 0.81-16.44; p = 0.09). Data on the correlation between early changes of cf/ctDNA and 18F-FDG PET/CT-based metabolic response will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: For the first time, we have shown that baseline cfDNA may predict survival outcome in early stage CC pts treated with NACT. Pending confirmation in larger series, testing for cfDNA at baseline could help select high-risk pts who may benefit from FOxTROT-like, NACT treatment strategies. While analysis of ctDNA in this setting did not appear useful to predict prognosis, these results might be secondary to the small sample size.

Chemotherapeutic advances have enabled successful cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expansion in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of combining liver surgery (LS) with HIPEC and CRS (which remains controversial) and its impact on overall survival (OS) rates. From 2007 to 2015, a total of 77 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer. Twenty-five of these patients underwent concomitant LS for suspicion of liver metastases (LM; group 2), and were compared with patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC only (group 1). Demographic and clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. Among the group 2 patients, two underwent major hepatectomies, six underwent multiple wedge resections, 16 underwent single wedge resections (one with radiofrequency ablation), and one underwent radiofrequency ablation alone. For groups 1 and 2, median peritoneal cancer index was 6 and 10 (range 0–26; p = 0.08), complication rates were 15.4 and 32.0 % (Dindo–Clavien ≥3; p = 0.15), and median follow-up was 34.2 and 25.5 months (range 0–75 and 3–97), respectively. One group 2 patient died of septic shock after 66 days. Pathology confirmed LM in 21 patients in group 2 (four with benign hepatic lesions were excluded from long-term outcome analysis). Two-year OS rates were 89.5 and 70.2 % (p = 0.04), and 2-year recurrence-free survival rates were 38.3 and 13.4 % (p = 0.01) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Simultaneous surgery for colorectal LM and PC is both feasible and safe, with low postoperative morbidity. Further longer-term studies would help determine its impact on patient survival.

80 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated poor efficacy in MSS mCRC. Previous research indicate that cetuximab (anti-EGFR chimeric monoclonal antibody) could initiate, independently from RAS mutation, an immunogenic tumor cell death and mediate antitumor immune response. In this trial, we aim to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-PDL1 avelumab (AVE) combined with cetuximab (CET) and irinotecan (IRI) for treatment refractory MSS mCRC. Methods: AVETUXIRI (NCT03608046) is a multicenter academic study recruiting MSS, BRAFV600E wt, mCRC patients (pts) refractory to standard treatment (fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and anti-EGFR treatment if RAS wt tumor) in 2 cohorts (cohort A: RAS wt – cohort B: RAS mut). In both cohorts, patients receive CET (400 mg/m2 W1, 250 mg/m2 W2, 500 mg/m2/2 weeks from W3), IRI (180 - 150 mg/m2/2 weeks from W1) and AVE (10 mg/kg/2 weeks starting from W3). Primary endpoints are overall response rate (ORR), defined as partial or complete response (PR or CR) according (i)RECIST1.1, and safety. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (DCR), PFS and OS. Based on a Simon 2-stage design for ORR in each cohort (cohort A: P0=0.15, P1=0.33 / cohort B: P0=0.09, P1=0.25 / α = 0.1, β = 0.2 in both cohorts), 10 and 13 patients are required in the first stage of cohort A and B respectively. At least 2 pts have to reach PR or CR in each cohort to allow the continuation of the trial in the 2nd stage. Results: Between Oct 2018 and Jan 2020, 23 patients (median age 62 y-old, 86.9% male 78.3% left-sided, 91.3% synchronous mCRC) have been included in the first stage of the trial. No major or unexpected safety events were observed. 21.7% (5/23) of pts presented grade 3 diarrhea, all related to IRI, with complete resolution after IRI dose reduction or interruption. A reduced starting dose of IRI (150 mg/m2) was amended (09/2019) for the last included 8 pts without any grade 3-4 diarrhea occurrence. Grade 1-2 hypothyroidism was the only immune-related side effect. 3 PR were observed in cohort A and none in cohort B. DCR was 60.0% (6/10) and 61.5% (8/13) in cohort A and B respectively. Median PFS and OS were respectively 4.2 and 12.7 months (cohort A) and 3.8 and 14.0 months (cohort B). 6 months-PFS rate was 40.0% and 38.5% in cohort A and B. 12 months-OS rate was 53.3% and 57.7% in cohort A and B. The median follow-up of patients was 9.2 months. Conclusions: The AVETUXIRI trial met its primary efficacy endpoint for RAS wt mCRC pts justifying the study continuation in cohort A (2nd stage). No PR was observed in RAS-mut cohort. Nevertheless, encouraging data of DCR, PFS and OS observed in RAS mut cohort allow the opening of a new cohort for RAS-mut mCRC (cohort C) with PFS as primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT03608046.

Objective Data from a trial of first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI (folinic acid, infusional 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) in metastatic colorectal cancer were retrospectively analysed to investigate the effects of primary tumour location and early tumour shrinkage on outcomes. Methods Patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer from a single-arm, open-label phase II study (NCT00508404) were included. Tumours located from the splenic flexure to rectum and in the caecum to transverse colon were defined as left- and right-sided, respectively. Baseline characteristics were summarised by primary tumour location and the effects of primary tumour location on outcomes—including objective response rate, resection rate, depth of response, duration of response and progression-free survival—were analysed. Progression-free survival and objective response rate were analysed by early tumour shrinkage status. Results Primary tumour location was determined in 52/69 (75%) patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer; 45 (87%) had left-sided disease. Median progression-free survival was longer in patients with left-sided tumours (11.2 vs. 7.2 months for right-sided disease) and more of these patients experienced early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% (53% vs. 29%). Early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. More patients with early tumour shrinkage ≥ 30% achieved a partial or complete response. Objective response rate, duration of response, depth of response and resection rates were similar in patients with left- and right-sided tumours. Conclusions This analysis has confirmed a prognostic effect of primary tumour location in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI. Early tumour shrinkage was associated with improved progression-free survival irrespective of tumour location. In right-sided disease, early tumour shrinkage may identify a subgroup of patients who might respond to panitumumab. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00508404.

We examined how the immune microenvironment molds tumor evolution at different metastatic organs in a longitudinal dataset of colorectal cancer. Through multiplexed analyses, we showed that clonal evolution patterns during metastatic progression depend on the immune contexture at the metastatic site. Genetic evidence of neoantigen depletion was observed in the sites with high Immunoscore and spatial proximity between Ki67+ tumor cells and CD3+ cells. The immunoedited tumor clones were eliminated and did not recur, while progressing clones were immune privileged, despite the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Characterization of immune-privileged metastases revealed tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic mechanisms of escape. The lowest recurrence risk was associated with high Immunoscore, occurrence of immunoediting, and low tumor burden. We propose a parallel selection model of metastatic progression, where branched evolution could be traced back to immune-escaping clones. The findings could inform the understanding of cancer dissemination and the development of immunotherapeutics.

Celyad recently initiated several clinical trials with the CYAD-01 product, a natural killer group 2D (NKG2D)-based chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), in both solid and hematologic tumor types. This review discusses the unique properties of CYAD-01, expecting to provide a new paradigm to fight against solid tumors.

Contains fulltext : 193579.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: The estimation of risk of recurrence for patients with colon carcinoma must be improved. A robust immune score quantification is needed to introduce immune parameters into cancer classification. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of total tumour-infiltrating T-cell counts and cytotoxic tumour-infiltrating T-cells counts with the consensus Immunoscore assay in patients with stage I-III colon cancer. METHODS: An international consortium of 14 centres in 13 countries, led by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, assessed the Immunoscore assay in patients with TNM stage I-III colon cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set, an internal validation set, or an external validation set. Paraffin sections of the colon tumour and invasive margin from each patient were processed by immunohistochemistry, and the densities of CD3+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the tumour and in the invasive margin were quantified by digital pathology. An Immunoscore for each patient was derived from the mean of four density percentiles. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic value of the Immunoscore for time to recurrence, defined as time from surgery to disease recurrence. Stratified multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between Immunoscore and outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. Harrell's C-statistics was used to assess model performance. FINDINGS: Tissue samples from 3539 patients were processed, and samples from 2681 patients were included in the analyses after quality controls (700 patients in the training set, 636 patients in the internal validation set, and 1345 patients in the external validation set). The Immunoscore assay showed a high level of reproducibility between observers and centres (r=0.97 for colon tumour; r=0.97 for invasive margin; p

e15622 Background: The REACHIN trial met its primary endpoint of improving PFS for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated with regorafenib (R) as compared to placebo (P): Median (m) PFS for R was 3.0 months (mo) (95% CI: 2.3-4.9) and 1.5 mo (95% CI : 1.2-2.0) for P with an HR= 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29-0.81), p=0.005 (Demols A et al, ASCO-GI 2019, Abstr 345). We exploratory analyzed the benefit of R according to tumor location: intra-hepatic (ICC), extra-hepatic (ECC), gallbladder (GB) or peri-hilar (PH). Methods: Tumor locations were recorded at randomization of patients in REACHIN (NCT02162914), a multicenter double-blinded P-controlled randomized phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of R in patients with locally advanced (non resectable) and metastatic histologically proven BTC, progressing after gemcitabine-platinum. We analyzed mPFS according to tumor location and their respective 95% CI. Results: 66 patients were randomized and the mPFS data are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Most of the patients had ICC location (64%). The mPFS in the P arm is similar according to the tumor location. Despite its exploratory value and the small number of patients per tumor location, R seems superior to P in ICC, GB and PH. Data in ECC are not conclusive. Additional biomarkers (FGFR, NGS analysis) are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02162914. [Table: see text]