Search

Objectives: Advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is a rare severe neoplasm, significantly limiting the ability of patients to do daily activities among other impacts of the cancer. Many adult patients present with advanced stage disease (stages III/IV). This analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbarzine (AVD) versus ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) for the frontline treatment of stage IV HL in Italy based on data from the ECHELON-1 clinical trial. Methods: The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the National Health Service using a Markov model with three mutually exclusive health states and a lifetime time horizon. Transition probabilities were taken from the six-year follow-up data of ECHELON-1. Costs were obtained mainly from published literature and national tariffs. For all drugs, ex-factory prices net of the mandatory reductions required by law were considered. Scenarios on possible confidential drug discounts were also explored. Results: BV in combination with AVD was associated with an increase of € 44,551 in total costs of 1.03 life-years (LYs) and 0.85 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as compared with ABVD in the base-case scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental cost-utility ratio were estimated equal to € 43,179/LYs and € 52,257/QALYs, respectively, when based on ex-factory prices. BV in combination with AVD was shown to be a cost-effective option in 24 out of 36 scenarios examining possible confidential discounts (ranging from 0% to 60%) for high-cost drugs included in the analysis based on a € 41,411/QALYs threshold for severe diseases. Conclusions: Based on data from 6 years of follow-up from the ECHELON-1 trial, BV in combination with AVD has the potential to be a cost-effective option versus ABVD for the frontline treatment of stage IV HL in Italy.

Background: Dapagliflozin, approved in the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), has demonstrated attenuation of CKD progression and a reduced risk of cardio-renal outcomes and all-cause mortality (ACM) versus placebo, in addition to standard of care (SoC). The aim of this economic evaluation was to assess the potential medical care cost offsets associated with reduced rates of cardio-renal outcomes in Italy. Methods: A comparative micro-simulation model estimated the outcome-related costs of dapagliflozin plus SoC versus SoC alone over a 3-year horizon based on the DAPA-CKD trial. Incidence rates of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), hospitalizations for heart failure (hHF), acute kidney injury (AKI) and ACM were estimated for a treated population of 90,564 patients. Associated direct medical costs for non-fatal events (ESKD, hHF and AKI) were calculated using available literature and national tariffs. The analysis was restricted to outcome-associated costs and did not consider the cost of drug treatments and disease management. Results: Patients treated with dapagliflozin plus SoC experienced fewer incident events of ESKD (6,540 vs 9,751), hHF (2,146 vs 4,242), AKI (3,772 vs. 5,271) and ACM (5,780 vs 8,037) per 90,564 treated patients versus those treated with SoC alone. Reductions (–35,6%) in clinical events (ESKD, hHF and AKI) were associated with a 34.4% reduction in total costs (€ 170 million) over 3 years. The clinical effect of dapagliflozin on ESKD management accounted for a € 134.5 million reduction in total costs. Conclusion: Based on the DAPA-CKD trial, dapagliflozin may prevent cardio-renal event incidence with a positive effect upon the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS). Over three years, we estimated that dapagliflozin can reduce the Italian NHS expenditure associated with the management of ESKD, hHF and AKI events by 34.4% (€ 170 million).

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the economic consequences of the introduction of roxadustat on the market as treatment for chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anaemia in Italy. Method: A budget impact model was developed to assess the economic impact of the introduction of roxadustat for the management of patient with CKD-related anaemia. The analysis was conducted considering National Health Service (NHS) perspective and three years’ time horizon. Eligible population for the treatment with roxadustat was estimated through published literature and clinicians’ support. Direct healthcare costs included drug acquisition (list prices for base case) and administration costs, monitoring costs, cost per blood transfusion, costs related to the management of adverse events and dialysis costs. Results: The model estimated a three years expenditure associated with the management of patients with CKD-related incident anaemia in Italy of about € 260 and € 44.6 million for non-dialysis dependent (NDD) and dialysis-dependent (DD) patients respectively. The introduction of roxadustat on the market could generate a reduction in the expenditure related to the iron supplementation both for NDD and for DD patients (−€ 397,305 and −€ 50,135 over three years of the analysis, respectively) and a reduction in the pharmaceutical expenditure for NDD patients (−€ 2.3 million, −€ 7.5 million and −€ 13 million at first, second and third year of the analysis). Overall, the introduction of roxadustat could generate a saving for NHS approximately equal to € 2.3, € 7.5 and € 13 million at first, second and third year of the analysis. Conclusion: The introduction of roxadustat could generate a reduction in the expenditure for the management of patients with CKD anaemia. A scenario analysis which used tender prices for ESAs and hypothesis of confidential discount for roxadustat showed that the saving for NHS will be kept if roxadustat’s discount is greater than 60.3%.

Gliomas are a group of heterogeneous tumors that account for substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs to patients and healthcare systems globally. Survival varies considerably by grade, histology, biomarkers, and genetic alterations such as IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation, and treatment, but is poor for some grades and histologies, with many patients with glioblastoma surviving less than a year from diagnosis. The present review provides an introduction to glioma, including its classification, epidemiology, economic and humanistic burden, as well as treatment options. Another focus is on treatment recommendations for IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma, and glioblastoma, which were synthesized from recent guidelines. While recommendations are nuanced and reflect the complexity of the disease, maximum safe resection is typically the first step in treatment, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy using temozolomide or procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. Immunotherapies and targeted therapies currently have only a limited role due to disappointing clinical trial results, including in recurrent glioblastoma, for which the nitrosourea lomustine remains the de facto standard of care. The lack of treatment options is compounded by frequently suboptimal clinical practice, in which patients do not receive adequate therapy after resection, including delayed, shortened, or discontinued radiotherapy and chemotherapy courses due to treatment side effects. These unmet needs will require significant efforts to address, including a continued search for novel treatment options, increased awareness of clinical guidelines, improved toxicity management for chemotherapy, and the generation of additional and more robust clinical and health economic evidence.

Objective: To estimate the economic impact of the introduction of a new care system based on apomorphine and Patient Support Program for motor fluctuations (“on-off” phenomena) in patients with Parkinson’s disease which are not sufficiently controlled by oral anti-Parkinson medication in Italy. Method: A Budget Impact model was developed to evaluate the new care system in patients with Parkinson’s disease over a 3-years’ time horizon. The comparator treatments included in the analysis were treatments based on apomorphine and levodopa + carbidopa. The analysis was conducted from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Costs included in the analysis were acquisition costs and device costs. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the uncertainty of the parameters used. A break-even analysis was conducted to identify the minimum number of subjects that would need to be treated with the new care system to obtain a positive Budget Impact (World With – World Without = 0). Results: The analysis shows that the introduction of the new care system based on apomorphine could generate a cost saving incurred by the NHS of over € 5.7 million in 3 years. Break-even analysis shows that if it were possible to intercept with the new treatment at least 9 patients treated with apomorphine, there would not be an increase in costs for the NHS. Conclusion: The new care system would respond to the unmet needs of patients with Parkinson’s disease by generating a reduction in the expenditure incurred by NHS.

Introduction: The present work aims to discuss the current scenario of procedures and regulations regarding budget impact analysis/models (BIA/BIM) at regional level in Italy and to provide a standardized approach and detailed recommendations for developing these analyses. Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect existing guidelines or specific regional procedures for budget impact analysis in Italy. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework, based on the ISPOR BIA guidelines. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and to provide possible solutions to any critical issues. A list of 39 statements was developed. The survey was distributed to 69 experts who rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as more than 66% of the panel agreeing/disagreeing with any given statement. Results: Sisty-nine experts answered the questionnaire; a total of 30/39 statements achieved consensus. There was agreement on most of the statements. Time horizon to consider and costs were the issues on which no agreement was found. The results allowed the working group to define a list of good practices. Conclusion: While the structure and development of BIM are now well-known and well-applied at national level, there remains a great diversity of management of BIM tools at regional level. Consensus was reached among participating experts, as to the main characteristics, determinants and features of regional BIA/BIM in the perspective of the Italian payer.

Objective: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam compared to colistin-imipenem in the treatment of hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections caused by imipenem-resistant pathogens. The perspective was both that of the National Health Service (NHS) and the social one. Methodology: A mixed model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients capable of highlighting the impacts of the disease on the quality of life and the absorption of economic resources of the patients in analysis. Modelled patients were those with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or complicated urinal tract infection (cUTI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (GN) pathogens. The model begins with a short-term decision tree describing possible treatment routes and outcomes for patients during the hospitalization period. Patients who are healed in the decision tree enter the long-term Markov model, designed to capture the follow-up costs and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients healed over their lifetime. Results: The analysis, conducted on a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, highlights how the use of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is advantageous both in terms of diagnosis and treatment in the short term and in terms of cost-effectiveness. In fact, it is dominant compared to colistin-imipenem both in the NHS and in the social perspective since, compared to an average saving of € 2,800.15 and € 3,174.63 respectively, it would generate an increase of 4.76 years of life and of 4.12 QALYs per patient.

Objective: This paper aims to investigate the duration of the pricing & reimbursement (P&R) procedures submitted in Italy by pharmaceutical marketing authorization holders (MAH) for drugs indicated for rare diseases. Methods: All the data used in this analysis were publicly available on different sources of the Italian Ministry of Health, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and other official websites. The information was systematically collected to investigate the timeline (days) needed to complete the P&R process. The process was divided into 6 simplified steps and the median and range of days needed for each phase were estimated based on data reported in official/published documents. The analysis was stratified considering every single step of the assessment phase and included segmentation of drugs into indications for rare diseases, Orphan designation, Innovation assessment and Managed entry agreements (MEAs). Results: Overall, 181 first indication procedures were submitted to AIFA in the period considered and, of these, 167 (92.3%) were completed and 129 procedures were considered for the final analysis and the median duration of the entire process (MAH submission to final Gazette publication) was 434 days (range 176.0-918.0). The duration of procedures for rare diseases (n = 53) was longer than those for non-rare-disease procedures (n = 76) (463.0 days vs 407.5 days respectively). Among rare disease procedures, orphan designation and MEAs represent predictors for time prolongation while innovation is associated with a shorter assessment time. Conclusion: The study describes the time spent in each phase of the assessment and the appraisal process and demonstrates that uncertainty represents the main driver for the increment in the overall time.