Search

Summary Background The triplet FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab showed improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab. However, the actual benefit of the upfront exposure to the three cytotoxic drugs compared with a preplanned sequential strategy of doublets was not clear, and neither was the feasibility or efficacy of therapies after disease progression. We aimed to compare a preplanned strategy of upfront FOLFOXIRI followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression versus a sequence of mFOLFOX6 (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI doublets, in combination with bevacizumab. Methods TRIBE2 was an open-label, phase 3, randomised study of patients aged 18–75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, with unresectable, previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, recruited from 58 Italian oncology units. Patients were stratified according to centre, ECOG performance status, primary tumour location, and previous adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomisation system incorporating a minimisation algorithm was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) via a masked web-based allocation procedure to two different treatment strategies. In the control group, patients received first-line mFOLFOX6 (85 mg/m2 of intravenous oxaliplatin concurrently with 200 mg/m2 of leucovorin over 120 min; 400 mg/m2 intravenous bolus of fluorouracil; 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 48 h) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg intravenously over 30 min) followed by FOLFIRI (180 mg/m2 of intravenous irinotecan over 120 min concurrently with 200 mg/m2 of leucovorin; 400 mg/m2 intravenous bolus of fluorouracil; 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 48 h) plus bevacizumab after disease progression. In the experimental group, patients received FOLFOXIRI (165 mg/m2 of intravenous irinotecan over 60 min; 85 mg/m2 intravenous oxaliplatin concurrently with 200 mg/m2 of leucovorin over 120 min; 3200 mg/m2 continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 48 h) plus bevacizumab followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression. Combination treatments were repeated every 14 days for up to eight cycles followed by fluorouracil and leucovorin (at the same dose administered at the last induction cycle) plus bevacizumab maintenance until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or consent withdrawal. Patients and investigators were not masked. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival 2, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression on any treatment given after first disease progression, or death, analysed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. Study recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02339116 . Findings Between Feb 26, 2015, and May 15, 2017, 679 patients were randomly assigned and received treatment (340 in the control group and 339 in the experimental group). At data cut-off (July 30, 2019) median follow-up was 35·9 months (IQR 30·1–41·4). Median progression-free survival 2 was 19·2 months (95% CI 17·3–21·4) in the experimental group and 16·4 months (15·1–17·5) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·63–0·88; p=0·0005). During the first-line treatment, the most frequent of all-cause grade 3–4 events were diarrhoea (57 [17%] vs 18 [5%]), neutropenia (168 [50%] vs 71 [21%]), and arterial hypertension (25 [7%] vs 35 [10%]) in the experimental group compared with the control group. Serious adverse events occurred in 84 (25%) patients in the experimental group and in 56 (17%) patients in the control group. Eight treatment-related deaths were reported in the experimental group (two intestinal occlusions, two intestinal perforations, two sepsis, one myocardial infarction, and one bleeding) and four in the control group (two occlusions, one perforation, and one pulmonary embolism). After first disease progression, no substantial differences in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported between the control and experimental groups, with the exception of neurotoxicity, which was only reported in the experimental group (six [5%] of 132 patients). Serious adverse events after disease progression occurred in 20 (15%) patients in the experimental group and 25 (12%) in the control group. Three treatment-related deaths after first disease progression were reported in the experimental group (two intestinal occlusions and one sepsis) and four in the control group (one intestinal occlusion, one intestinal perforation, one cerebrovascular event, and one sepsis). Interpretation Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression seems to be a preferable therapeutic strategy to sequential administration of chemotherapy doublets, in combination with bevacizumab, for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer selected according to the study criteria. Funding The GONO Cooperative Group, the ARCO Foundation, and F Hoffmann–La Roche.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response.METHODS: KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031.FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], pINTERPRETATION: Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Purpose/Objective On September 2009: We started a randomized multicenter phase III study comparing chemoradiation (CRT) (Aldestein RTOG regimen) versus induction chemotherapy followed by Cetuximab radiation (IBRT). The main study’s aim was comparison of overall survival but no formal analyses have been made between the two arms because of low accrual and high amount of missing data. The goal of this paper is to identify the reasons of difference in accrual and quality of data among participating centers. Material/Methods Statistic: We correlated data collection quality with relevance of the centers, accrual and number of scientific papers (both specific on HNC and other topics) of each PI. We created an HNC publishing score dividing the number of HNC specific papers for the overall number of published papers. Results We observed a strong difference in the accrual of pts as well as in the quality of data among the participating centers. The accrual was independent from the quality of data since some centers with low accrual produced high quality data with an excellent follow up. We found a correlation among both number of published papers of each PI and HNC publishing score with the quality of data. Conclusion The study demonstrated that expertise in HNC is important not only to ensure a better outcomes but also to provide high quality data in phase III trials.

BACKGROUND We evaluated the impact of center expertise, in terms of number of patients treated, on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS We performed a pooled analysis including data from 6 randomized trials in head and neck SCC conducted in Italy. We evaluated the association between OS or PFS and the number of patients recruited by the center. RESULTS The outcome of 903 patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed (median follow-up 76 months). The hazard ratio (HR) comparing the third and the first quartiles of the distribution of number of patients per center showed an advantage in PFS (HR 0.59, range 0.53-0.65, P

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous disease often presenting at an already advanced stage. Cisplatin chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease, although its efficacy varies according to different studies. Thus, treatment selection is a challenge, especially in older patients, who frequently have several comorbidities. Moreover, the majority of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease are unsuitable for local treatment, either surgery or radiation therapy. The only treatment option for them is systemic therapy, but prognosis remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than 12 months. Methods: A group of Italian key opinion leaders in the field of HNSCC gathered several times in 2018 in order to retrieve a set of statements to help clinicians in their daily decision-making process for the treatment of patients with different scenarios of HNSCC. Results and Conclusion: The panel agreed on 22 statements that were identified as “good clinical points” based on the available literature or after discussion of the most relevant aspect of the underlying diseases when no international consensus was available. The panel identified a number of possible scenarios (namely 71) in which these statements may be helpful to guide decision-making for the best treatment selection.

Background Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Dose-dense should be the preferred schedule of administration. However, its long-term benefit is unknown. Methods In the Italian multicentre Phase 3 randomised MIG-1 trial, node-positive and high-risk node- negative breast cancer patients were randomised to receive six cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen administered every 3 (FEC21) or 2 (FEC14) weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Results From 1992 to 1997, 1214 patients were included. Median follow-up was 15.8 years. In all, 15-year OS was 71% and 68% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.89; p = 0.25). In all, 15-year EFS was 47% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.87; p = 0.18). In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, among patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours, 15-year OS was 70% and 65% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.06); 15-year EFS was 58% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.96). Conclusions Updated results from the MIG-1 study are numerically in favour of dose-dense chemotherapy, and suggest a long-term benefit of this approach in high-risk early breast cancer patients.

Die Erfahrung von Ubel, Schmerz und Leid unterschiedlicher Natur bleibt niemandem erspart. Daher wundert es nicht, dass die Existenz solcher negativen Sachverhalte (kurz: Ubel) seit Anbeginn der Philosophie problematisiert wird. Der Umgang mit dem Problem des Ubels nimmt unterschiedliche Formen an, je nachdem in welchem philosophischen und weltanschaulichen Rahmen es formuliert wird.

Summary Background There are few effective treatment options for patients with recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pembrolizumab showed antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in early-phase trials. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study at 97 medical centres in 20 countries. Patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease (or both), or whose disease recurred or progressed within 3–6 months of previous multimodal therapy containing platinum for locally advanced disease, were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four per stratum with an interactive voice-response and integrated web-response system to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks intravenously or investigator's choice of standard doses of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab intravenously (standard-of-care group). The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02252042, and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings Between Dec 24, 2014, and May 13, 2016, 247 patients were randomly allocated to pembrolizumab and 248 were randomly allocated to standard of care. As of May 15, 2017, 181 (73%) of 247 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 207 (83%) of 248 patients in the standard-of-care group had died. Median overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·4 months (95% CI 6·4–9·4) with pembrolizumab and 6·9 months (5·9–8·0) with standard of care (hazard ratio 0·80, 0·65–0·98; nominal p=0·0161). Fewer patients treated with pembrolizumab than with standard of care had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (33 [13%] of 246 vs 85 [36%] of 234). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypothyroidism with pembrolizumab (in 33 [13%] patients) and fatigue with standard of care (in 43 [18%]). Treatment-related death occurred in four patients treated with pembrolizumab (unspecified cause, large intestine perforation, malignant neoplasm progression, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and two patients treated with standard of care (malignant neoplasm progression and pneumonia). Interpretation The clinically meaningful prolongation of overall survival and favourable safety profile of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma support the further evaluation of pembrolizumab as a monotherapy and as part of combination therapy in earlier stages of disease. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improves locoregional control and overall survival of locoregionally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) when compared to radiotherapy alone, but this approach is hampered by significant toxicity. Therefore, alternative ways to enhance the radiation effects are worth investigating. Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine), in addition to its activity against a variety of solid tumors, including SCCHN, is one of the most potent radiosensitizers, and it has an overall favorable safety profile. In this paper, the clinical experience with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation in the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN is reviewed.We conducted a review of the literature on the clinical experience with radiotherapy combined with either single-agent gemcitabine or gemcitabine/cisplatin-based polychemotherapy for the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN. We also searched abstracts in databases of major international oncology meetings from the last 20 years. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for complete response rate and grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate.A total of 13 papers were eligible for the literature review. For schedules using a gemcitabine dose intensity (DI) below 50 mg/m(2) per week, the complete response rate was 86% (95% CI, 74%-93%) with grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%) and acceptable late toxicity. In one of the studies employing such low DIs, survival data were provided showing a 3-year overall survival of 50%. Compared with DI ≥50 mg/m(2) per week, there was no difference in the complete response rate (71%; 95% CI, 55%-83%; p = .087) but a significantly higher (p.001) grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%), often leading to treatment interruptions (survival data provided in 8 studies; 3-year overall survival, 27%-63%). Late toxicity comprising mainly dysphagia was generally underreported, whereas information about xerostomia and skin fibrosis was scarce.This review highlights the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine and suggests that even very low dosages (less than 50 mg/m(2) per week) provide a sufficient therapeutic ratio and therefore should be further investigated. Refinements in radiation schemes, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, in combination with low-dose gemcitabine and targeted agents, such as cetuximab, are currently being investigated.Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) has become the standard treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). This approach is hampered by significant toxicity. This paper reviews the studies using gemcitabine as an alternative radio-sensitizer for CCRT in patients with LAHNC. In this capacity, despite its mild intrinsic toxicity, gemcitabine comes with high rates of severe mucositis when used in dosages exceeding 50 mg/m(2) per week. CCRT with low-dose gemcitabine provides a sufficient therapeutic ratio, combining clinical activity, similar to the higher-dose regimens, with lower toxicity. Further investigation is warranted.

Freilich nimmt der Umgang mit dem Problem des Ubels unterschiedliche Formen an, je nachdem in welchem philosophischen und weltanschaulichen Rahmen es formuliert wird. Neben unterschiedlichen Formulierungen, die Argumente aus dem Ubel annehmen konnen, sind auch unterschiedliche Antworten erforderlich. In diesem Kapitel findet sich eine systematische Einfuhrung in den Themenkomplex des Problems des Ubels.

In diesem Kapitel wird detailliert aufgezeigt, welche Schwachpunkte solche Argumente haben und inwieweit auch Humesche Argument von einer skeptischen Entgegnung betroffen sein konnen. Es werden sowohl formale wie auch inhaltliche Kritikpunkte ausgearbeitet und verallgemeinert. Abschliesend wird eine systematische Ubersicht der moglichen Einwande gegen Humesche Argumente aus dem Ubel geliefert.

In diesem Kapitel wird auf Rowes wenig beachtetes Bayesianisches Argument eingegangen. Das Argument wird prasentiert, analysiert, wohlwollend rekonstruiert und schlieslich aus formalen und inhaltlichen Grunden zuruckgewiesen.

Im folgenden Kapitel mochte ich Argumente aus dem Ubel besprechen, die keinen schwer rechtfertigbaren Schritt von den uns bekannten moralischen Rechtfertigungsgrunden fur die Zulassung eines Ubels zu allen moglichen Rechtfertigungsgrunden enthalten. Paul Draper hat zwei Argumente vorgestellt, die von dieser Kritik nicht betroffen sind und als „Humean Arguments“ bezeichnet. Humesche Argumente aus dem Ubel sind dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie das Ubel in der Welt wie ein zu erklarendes Datum behandeln. Solche Argumente werden deshalb auch „explanatorische Argumente (aus dem Ubel)“ genannt. Solche Argumente behaupten im Grunde, dass eine mit dem Theismus nicht konsistente Theorie eine hohere Erklarungskraft (auch: Vorhersageleistung) fur die Daten (hier: die Existenz ubler Sachverhalte) bietet.

Im Folgenden werde ich Einwande gegen die empirische Pramisse prasentieren, die sich auf ein allgemeines epistemisches Prinzip berufen, das von seinen Vertretern „Condition for Reasonable Epistemic Access“ bezeichnet und griffig mit „CORNEA“ abgekurzt wurde. Ursprunglich als Antwort auf Rowes Aufsatz von 1979 entwickelt, ist das CORNEA-Prinzip noch eng an das Prinzip der Verlasslichkeit (Principle of Credulity, := PC) gekoppelt. Spater wird CORNEA als Bedingung weiterentwickelt, die in beinahe beliebigen epistemischen Kontexten Anwendung findet. Fur sich allein genommen stellt die Annahme von CORNEA noch keine Widerlegung der empirischen Pramisse dar.

Induction chemotherapy prior to planned definitive local therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma has been studied for at least three decades but the debate on its role is still open. Recent landmark studies, including those presented at outstanding meetings and those still ongoing on induction chemotherapy in different clinical situations, are critically reviewed. Data confirm that a docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) based induction chemotherapy may be considered in clinical practice as one of the possible options when a larynx preservation strategy is attempted. On the contrary, current data do not support the use of induction chemotherapy before a planned surgical intervention for advanced oral cavity and oropharyngeal tumors. Currently, for patients with locoregionally advanced unresectable disease, concomitant chemo-radiation remains the standard of care in waiting for results of the few ongoing studies that hopefully will clarify the role of induction TPF before either concomitant chemo-radiation or bio-radiation.

Background No evidence exists to recommend a specific chemotherapy regimen in young breast cancer patients. We performed a pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients and its impact on the risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea. Patients and methods In the MIG1 study, node-positive or high-risk node-negative patients were randomised to 6 cycles of fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (dose-dense) or 3 (standard-interval) weeks. In the GIM2 study, node-positive patients were randomised to 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval EC or FEC followed by 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval paclitaxel. Using individual patient data, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival by means of a Cox proportional hazards model and the odds ratio for treatment-induced amenorrhoea through a logistic regression model were calculated for each study. A meta-analysis of the two studies was performed using the random effect model to compute the parameter estimates. Results A total of 1,549 patients were included. Dose-dense chemotherapy was associated with a significant improved overall survival as compared to standard-interval chemotherapy (HR, 0.71; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.54–0.95; p = 0.021). The pooled HRs were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54–1.12) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40–1.06) for patients with hormone receptor-positive and -negative tumours, respectively (interaction p = 0.330). No increased risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea was observed with dose-dense chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80–1.25; p = 0.989). Conclusion Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered the preferred treatment option in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients.

IntroductionSurgical resection offers the best chance of cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective to obtain curative resection in patients with multiple, bilobar CRLMs that are unresectable in a single procedure. Up to now TSH has been the prerogative of dedicated liver surgery centers. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of TSH also in community hospitals.MethodsOf 294 patients operated on for CRLMs between September 1997 and June 2012 in 2 district community hospitals (belonging to the same regional healthcare district), 43 (14.6%) were scheduled for TSH. Thirty-eight/43 received neoadjuvant and/or bridge chemotherapy (2 neoadjuvant only, 4 neoadjuvant and bridge, 32 bridge only).ResultsThe mean follow-up was 35.74 ± 29.53 months. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 31.4%, with a median survival time of 31 months. Twenty-nine patients completed the planned procedure (OS: 42.9%; median 47 months), while 14 did not because of disease progression (OS: 0%; median 13 months). No operative mortality occurred within the first 90 days either after the first or second stage.ConclusionsOur results suggest good efficacy and safety of TSH even when performed in a community hospital setting. Shifting patient selection from neoadjuvant to bridge chemotherapy had no impact on outcome once the clearing of the liver had been achieved. In patients presenting with synchronous CRLMs, simultaneous colorectal resection and clearing of the less involved hemiliver as the first surgical step is feasible without any negative impact on outcome.

Background: The phase III EXTREME study demonstrated that combining cetuximab with platinum/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) significantly improved overall survival in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) compared with platinum/5-FU alone. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate elevated tumor EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker in EXTREME study patients. Patients and methods: Dual-color FISH was used to determine absolute and relative EGFR copy number. Models of differing stringencies were used to score and investigate whether increased copy number was predictive for the activity of cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU. Results: Tumors from 312 of 442 patients (71%) were evaluable by FISH and met the criteria for statistical analysis. A moderate increase in EGFR copy number was common, with high-level amplification of the gene occurring in a small fraction of tumors (∼11%). Considering each of the models tested, no association of EGFR copy number with overall survival, progression-free survival or best overall response was found for patients treated with cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU. Conclusion: Tumor EGFR copy number is not a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab plus platinum/5-FU as first-line therapy for patients with R/M SCCHN.

Background: A phase III trial demonstrated that cetuximab is the first agent in 30 years to improve survival when added to platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-fluorouracil) first line for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). This analysis of the trial assessed the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL). Patients and methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-H&N35) module were used to assess QoL. Results: Of 442 patients randomly assigned, 291 (QLQ-C30) and 289 (QLQ-H&N35) patients completed at least one evaluable questionnaire. For QLQ-C30, cycle 3 and month 6 mean scores for platinum–fluorouracil plus cetuximab were not significantly worse than those for platinum–fluorouracil. Pattern-mixture analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the global health status/QoL score in the cetuximab arm (P = 0.0415) but no treatment differences in the social functioning scale. For QLQ-H&N35, the mean score for the cetuximab arm was not significantly worse than that for the chemotherapy arm for all symptom scales at all post-baseline visits. At cycle 3, some symptom scores significantly favored the cetuximab arm (pain, swallowing, speech problems, and social eating). Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to platinum–fluorouracil does not adversely affect the QoL of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN.

Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Induction chemotherapy may improve the results further by enhancing both loco-regional and distant control. Fifty patients with untreated, stage IV (UICC 1992) undifferentiated NPC were initially treated with three courses of epidoxorubicin, 90 mg/m(2), day 1 and cisplatin, 40 mg/m(2), days 1 and 2, every three weeks and then underwent three courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-4 and fluorouracil, 200mg/m(2)/day, days 1-4 (weeks 1, 4, 7), alternated to three splits of radiation (week 2-3, 5-6, 8-9-10) up to 70 Gy. All patients but one received 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy. Toxicities from induction chemotherapy were grade III or IV mucositis (2%), grade III or IV nausea/vomiting (22%), grade III or IV hematological toxicity (6%). At the end of induction phase 12% of CRs, 84% of PRs were recorded. Toxicities from alternating chemo-radiotherapy were grade III or IV mucositis (30%), grade III or IV nausea/vomiting (8%), grade III or IV hematological toxicity (24%). Overall, 86% of CRs and 14% of PRs were observed. Four-year progression free survival and overall survival rates are 71% and 81%, respectively. In a small number of patients studied, no correlation between the level of EGFR overexpression and outcomes was detected. In locally advanced UNPC our combined program including induction chemotherapy followed by alternating chemo-radiotherapy is active and gives promising long-term outcomes with acceptable toxicity and optimal patients' compliance. This program merits to be tested in a phase III trial.

Background In order to improve our cisplatin–5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based alternating chemo-radiotherapy regimen, in 1996 we started an investigational program to explore a modified alternating regimen including gemcitabine given both with radiosensitizing and cytotoxic intent. Materials and methods Based on our previous feasibility trial, we conducted a second study testing the feasibility and activity of the following schedule: gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 2–5 (weeks 1, 4, 7 and 10) alternated with three courses of radiotherapy (RT) (weeks 2–3, 5–6 and 8–9) with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. Gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 was also administered on the Monday of each week of RT. Results Forty-seven patients with stage IV (41 patients) unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN) or who had relapsed after surgery (6 patients) were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Eight patients (18%) did not complete the treatment. Main grade 3–4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (44%); neutropenia with fever (12%); thrombocytopenia (37%); anemia (30% grade 3). One patient died in therapy due to sepsis. Most patients needed hospitalization and tube-feeding or parenteral nutrition. However, 44% of patients had a weight loss >10%. Thirty-four patients had a complete response (72%). Three partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate, 79%). At a median follow-up of 38 months actuarial 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 43%, 39% and 64%, respectively. Data of locoregional control favorably compare with those from our database of patients treated with alternating cisplatin–fluorouracil and radiation within controlled clinical trials (64% versus 40%). Conclusions The inclusion of gemcitabine into an alternating regimen seems to improve the results achievable with the original alternating program in stage IV patients. However, due to the high acute toxicity correlated, this intensive regimen should be managed by institutions well trained in multidisciplinary treatments.

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone or concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation. The National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa (IST) was the coordinator of two multicentre randomised trials comparing an alternating chemotherapy and radiation approach to radiotherapy alone with standard fractionation (HN-8 trial: 157 patients) or accelerated fractionation (HN-9 trial: 136 patients) in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A single database of the two studies was created and a univariate analysis was performed. The Cox regression model, adjusted for the effect of other prognostic factors, was used to test the impact of the treating institution on survival. Three-year overall survival was 46% for patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation at the coordinating centre and 27% for those treated with the same approach at the affiliated centres (P=0.0001). No difference was detected between patients treated with radiation alone at the coordinating centre or outside (23% versus 21%: P=0.52). The hazard ratio of death for patients treated at the affiliated centres with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation was 2.15 (95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.45-3.18), while it was 1.003 (95% C.I. 0.65-1.55) for those treated with radiation alone. In our experience, the treating institution had a significant impact only on the prognosis of patients treated with the multidisciplinary approach. This finding has implications, both in terms of clinical research and clinical practice.

The adverse effects of radiation therapy, often integrated with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies, on the skin include severe acute and chronic dermatitis associated with pain, discomfort, itching, and burning, and may heavily affect patients' quality of life. The management of these skin adverse effects in head and neck cancer patients (HNCPs) are very heterogeneous due to the lack of shared rigorous classification systems and evidence based treatments. A multidisciplinary group of head and neck cancer specialists from Italy met with the aim of reaching a consensus on a clinical definition and management of dermatitis in HNCPs treated with radiotherapy with or without systemic therapies in order to improve skin toxicity management. The Delphi Appropriateness Method was used. External expert reviewers then evaluated the conclusions carefully according to their area of expertise. This paper offers contains seven clusters of statements about the management of dermatitis in HNCPs and a review of recent literature on these topics. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Alternating chemoradiotherapy was shown by our institution to be superior to standard radiation in patients with nonsurgical squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). Gemcitabine has shown in vitro and in vivo radiosensitizing properties, synergistic activity with cisplatin, and cytotoxic activity against SCC-HN. Thus, the authors tested the feasibility and antitumoral activity of a modified alternating chemoradiotherapy program that includes gemcitabine. Fourteen patients with stage IV (nine patients) or relapsed after surgery (five patients) unresectable SCC-HN were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The treatment plan consisted of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, weeks 1 and 5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, day 5, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 5, 6, 7. Radiation was administered during weeks 2, 3, and 4 and 6, 7, and 8 with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. At the end of the combined therapy, patients had to receive two additional courses of cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day, and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, for 5 days every 21 days. All the patients are evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. Main grade III-IV toxicities and frequencies were: neutropenia (79%), neutropenia with fever (50%), thrombocytopenia (57%), anemia (35%), mucositis (100%), and cutaneous toxicity (14%). Ten patients (71%) had a weight loss greater than 10%. All but two patients needed hospitalization and tube feeding or parenteral nutrition. The median relative dose intensity of gemcitabine actually delivered was 83%. Two patients died 1 month after the end of treatment before the final evaluation. One patient died of sepsis during the additional cisplatin and fluorouracil courses before response assessment. Ten patients reached a complete response (intention to treat: 71%), and 1 patient had a partial response (9%). At a median follow-up of 34 months, the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival are 41% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 3-year locoregional control is 70%. Considering the expected poor prognosis of the enrolled patients, this combined regimen showed an impressive antitumoral activity, but the severity of acute local and hematologic toxicity correlated makes the exportation of this regimen unproposable. However, the activity observed warrants the exploration of different, less toxic, chemo-radiotherapy programs including gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low-total-dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the same chemoradiotherapy approach with high-total-dose partly accelerated radiotherapy. METHODS During 6 years, 136 consecutive patients with previously untreated unfavorable Stage II or Stage III–IV (International Union Against Cancer) SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg/m2 of body surface area per day for 5 consecutive days) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2 per day for 5 consecutive days; weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) alternated with three 2-week courses of radiotherapy (20 grays [Gy] per course, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week; ALT, 70 patients) or to partly accelerated radiotherapy with final concomitant boost technique (75 Gy/40 fractions in 6 weeks; partly accelerated radiotherapy [PA-RT], 66 patients). RESULTS At the median follow-up of 60 months (range, 30–102 months), no statistical differences were observed in overall survival, progression free survival, or locoregional control between the 2 treatments. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and progression free survival were 37% and 35%, respectively, in the ALT group and 29% and 27%, respectively, in PA-RT group. The median overall survival and progression free survival were 24 and 15 months, respectively, in the ALT arm and 18 and 11 months, respectively, in PA-RT arm. Actuarial 3-year locoregional control rates were 32% in the ALT group and 27% in the PA-RT group. At multivariate analysis, tumor classification was the only factor that emerged as a significant independent variable affecting overall survival. Patients treated in the PA-RT arm experienced higher Grade 3+ (World Health Organization) acute skin and mucosal reactions than patients in the ALT arm. Moreover, local late mucosal and skin toxicities occurred more often in patients treated with PA-RT. CONCLUSIONS This trial failed to disclose statistically significant differences in the outcome of patients treated with either ALT or PA-RT. Therefore, definitive conclusions could not be made. However, acute skin effects and late mucosal and skin toxicities above the clavicles appeared to be significantly lower with chemoradiotherapy. Cancer 2001;92:2856–67. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: To investigate the impact of pretreatment and treatment-related factors on local-regional control and overall survival rates in advanced (III and IV stage) head and neck cancer patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy, a selected group of 115 patients who had PS ≤ 1 and received a total dose of radiotherapy (RT) within ± 5% of that planned, was analyzed. Methods and Materials: Patients were planned to receive 4 cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil) alternated with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions). However, mainly due to systemic toxicity, about 30% of the patients received less than 90% of the planned combined chemotherapy total dose (CCTD). Based on differences in treatment planning and delivery, patients were divided into two groups. For living patients, median follow-up is 34 months (range: 24–111 months). Results: At multivariate analysis, RT technique ( p = 0.008), N stage ( p = 0.010) and CCTD ( p = 0.027) were independent predictors of LRC. Compared to each favorable subset (RR = 1), the relative risks of LRC failure were 2.18 (95% CI: 1.21–3.91), 2.23 (95% CI: 1.11–4.50) and 2.23 (95% CI: 1.15–4.31) for patients without improved dose distribution and treatment delivery, with bilateral nodes or nodes greater than 6 cm, and with a CCTD lower than 90%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, only RT treatment was found to be an independent predictor ( p = 0.037), with an RR of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.02–2.53) for patients without improved dose distribution and treatment delivery. Conclusion: Optimal delivery of RT dose is crucial in patients with advanced head and neck tumors, even if they receive chemotherapy as part of their treatment. This study also suggests that chemotherapy total dose may play a role in patient outcome, but this must be confirmed prospectively.

6022Background: The impact of centre expertise on outcome of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients (pts) treated with chemotherapy (CT) +/- radiotherapy (RT) has been sparsely evaluated. Pts selectio...

To date, the specific role of "in-field" crusting exudation on pain and on activity of daily living (ADL) in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients undergoing treatment with cetuximab and radiochemotherapy has been neglected. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the role of crusting exudation on the severity of pain and ADL METHODS: Thirty-seven of the 45 HNSCC patients enrolled in the alternating radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and cetuximab trial were evaluated in this study. The main radiodermatitis signs (the intensity of erythema, the extension of dry, and moist desquamation and of necrosis)--including crusting exudation severity--pain, ADL, and radiodermatitis scores were registered at least weekly during and after treatment. The correlation between crusting exudation and pain or ADL was evaluated.The "in-field" crusting exudation score seemed to have the strongest correlation with pain (Spearman's rho = 0.897; p0.001) and the most intense influence on it (Co-B = 0.715; 95% C.I. = 0.643-0.787). However, it seemed to have a weaker correlation with ADL than the other clinical radiodermatitis signs.Crusts have the strongest correlation with pain in patients with Cetuximab-related radiation dermatitis. Moreover, the presence of crusts can lead operators to misclassify dermatitis as score 4, causing unnecessary delays or interruptions in treatment.

BACKGROUND The administration of granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) should allow an increase in the doses of chemotherapy for patients with advanced cancers of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eleven patients with histologically proven relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck entered this Phase I study based on the combination of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day for 5 days), escalating doses of 5-fluorouracil, both given by intravenous injection from day 1 to 5, and GM-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg from day 8 to day 19. RESULTS The maximum tolerated 5-fluorouracil dosage was 300 mg/m2 i.v. bolus for 5 consecutive days q. 3 weeks. Thrombocytopenia was the limiting factor to further increase of 5-fluorouracil dosage. Moderate to severe stomatitis were quite rare despite the increased dose of the antimetabolite. GM-CSF was well tolerated: no significant local or systemic side effects attributable to this drug were recorded. CONCLUSIONS Adding GM-CSF to the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil allowed to increase 5-fluorouracil dose up to 50% over the conventional dosage. Further increase of the dose was precluded by the development of severe thrombocytopenia.

Background Intensification of chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unlikely due to toxicity. Cetuximab combined either with radiotherapy or with chemotherapy showed favourable toxic profile with positive results in both combinations. Therefore, cetuximab could intensify chemoradiation without worsening toxicity. We conducted a phase II study of chemoradiation and cetuximab. Patients and methods Eligible patients had stage III–IV M0 HNSCC. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day × 5 days) and fluorouracil (200 mg/m2/day × 5 days) rapidly alternated to three split courses of radiotherapy up to 70 Gy and concurrent weekly cetuximab. The primary end point of the study was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Fourty-five patients were enrolled: median age was 56 years, 38 had stage IV disease and 40 nodal involvement. CR occurred in 32 patients (71%). PFS and OS was 21+ months and 32.6+, respectively. Acute grade 3–4 toxic effects were in the expected range, but grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 33 patients. Conclusions The combination of cetuximab, cisplatin, fluorouracil and radiotherapy leads to a very high proportion of CR and it is feasible with toxic effects similar to those expected by radiochemotherapy. The only unexpected toxicity was skin toxicity: grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 73% of the patients.

Between 1983 and 1986, the National Institute for Cancer Research in Genoa and affiliated institutions conducted a randomized study to compare two different ways of combining chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT). One hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive neoadjuvant CT followed by definitive RT (treatment arm A) or alternating CT and RT. In treatment arm A, RT consisted of 70 Gy to the involved areas and 50 Gy to the uninvolved neck at 2 Gy/fraction, five fractions per week. In treatment arm B, RT consisted of 60 Gy to involved areas and 50 Gy to the uninvolved neck in three courses of 20 Gy each, 2 Gy/fraction, ten fractions/2 weeks alternated with four courses of CT. CT consisted of vinblastine 6 mg/m2 intravenously followed 6 hours later by bleomycin 30 IU intramuscularly, day 1; methotrexate 200 mg intravenously, day 2; leucovorin rescue, day 3. CT was repeated every 2 weeks up to four courses. The same CT was used in both treatment arms of the study. Fifty-five patients were entered in treatment arm A and 61 in treatment arm B. Complete responses were 7/48 and 19/57 in treatment arms A and B, respectively (P less than 0.03). Four-year progression-free survival was 4% in treatment arm A and 12% in treatment arm B (P less than 0.02), and four-year survival was 10% in A and 22% in B (P less than 0.02). Mucosal tolerance was significantly worse in treatment arm B (P less than 0.00004). The subgroup analysis shows the major improvement of alternating CT and RT in patients with the worst prognostic characteristics.

Background The addition of gemcitabine may be a reasonable way to enhance the activity of the alternating cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiation regimen considered the referring approach for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck at the National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa. Methods Three courses of cisplatin, 20mg/m 2 /day and 5-fluorouracil, 200mg/m 2 /day, days 1–5 (weeks 1, 4, and 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiotherapy at standard fractionation (weeks 2–3, 5–6, 8–9) up to 60Gy, and gemcitabine, 50mg/m 2 on monday of each week of radiation, were administered to 47 patients with stage IV (42 patients) or relapsed after surgery (5 patients), SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx. Results Eighty-five percent of the patients completed the planned treatment. Main grade 3–4 acute toxicities were: mucositis (40%), neutropenia (26%) and thrombocytopenia (30%). Twenty-seven patients reached a complete response (57%). Seven partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate: 72%). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 50%, 43% and 54%, respectively. Conclusions The addition of gemcitabine at low dose to our referring alternating regimen is feasible and very active. It may improve the long-term outcomes despite an acceptable increase of acute mucoseal toxicity.

The aim of this multicenter trial was to test the feasibility and the activity of a three-drug combination where paclitaxel is added to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients with metastatic or relapsed SCC-HN unsuitable for further loco-regional radical treatment, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were eligible to receive paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 (3-hr infusion) day 1, CDDP 25 mg/m2/day and 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day bolus on days 1, 2, 3 every three weeks up to a maximum of five courses. Fourty-seven patients were enrolled by five Institutions in Italy. Main grade III-IV toxicities were: neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (6%), anemia (4%), diarrhea (2%), mucositis (2%). Six patients had a complete response (13.3%) and eight a partial response (17.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival are 4.1 and 7.9 months. One-year progression free survival and overall survival are 16% and 29%. This three-drug regimen has an excellent safety profile. The activity in the palliation of recurrent SCC-HN, however, does not appear to be improved in comparison with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin and paclitaxel regimens. Recent studies indicate a more promising role of taxanes including triplets in the induction therapy of previously untreated patients.

Aims and background Radiation-induced permanent xerostomia occurs frequently in patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated by parallel opposed lateral fields. An ipsilateral technique by using co-planar multiple-field arrangement was designed to restrict treatment to the primary tumor and neck on the same side for patients with selected lateralized squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Methods From November 2001 till December 2002, 30 patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of tonsillar fossa, retro-molar trigone, alveolar ridge and oropharyngeal lateral wall were included in this investigational trial and treated with an ipsilateral multiple field technique: in detail, oblique opposed two upper half fields were planned ipsilaterally to the squamous cell carcinoma site to cover PTV1 and PTV2, whereas an anterior-lower half field was planned to encompass the lower neck node area above clavicles. On CT scans, the contralateral parotid gland was outlined as organ at risk and the contralateral upper lymph node area was contoured as volume of interest. In selected cases, convergent oblique two wedge-pair half fields were added to opposed oblique two-field technique in order to cover only PTV2: generally, in these patients, PTV1 received 1.8 Gy per fraction and PTV2 2.2 Gy per fraction up to total doses of 54 Gy and 66 Gy, respectively. Results Ten patients received radical radiotherapy, 9 patients radical alternating chemo-radiotherapy, and 11 patients adjuvant radiotherapy. At the end of treatment, unilateral confluent mucositis was recorded in 13 (43%) patients and unilateral moist skin epidermolysis in 14 (46%) patients. Six months after the end of radiotherapy, grade 0 xerostomia was recorded in 20 (67%) patients. No patient experienced grade 2+ xerostomia. At a median follow-up of 12 months, 26 (86%) patients were alive and well; 2 patients (6%) developed contralateral neck node failure, both 4 months after the end of ipsilateral radiotherapy. Conclusions These results, although preliminary, suggest that by using an ipsilateral radiotherapy technique, symptomatic xerostomia may be avoided in selected patients with lateralized squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck without an increased short-term risk of contralateral nodal failure.

Background To report local long-term morbidity after concomitant boost radiotherapy (AFRT) or alternating chemoradiotherapy (CTRT), we analyzed the toxicity data recorded in 168 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated at our institution within phase II-III studies. Patients and Methods All patients enrolled in three consecutive phase II-III studies and followed for a minimum of three months after the end of treatment were included in the present analysis. Local late reactions were scored prospectively. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or more (2-4) late local toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC was taken as endpoint. The median follow-up is 32.0 months (range, 3.3-138.1 months). For living patients the minimum and median follow-up are 12.1 and 69.3 months, respectively. Results The five-year actuarial incidence of grade 2+ and grade 3+ toxicity are 56.7 ± 5% and 21 ± 4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, acute mucositis grade, complementary surgery, primary site and performance status proved to be independent predictive factors of grade 2+ late toxicity with P values of Conclusions A substantial proportion of surviving patients develops late complications, although severe irreversible reactions occur in a minority of patients. Acute local toxicity can be used to predict local late toxicity that arises within five years of the end of treatment.