Search

Association between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has long been evaluated. Indeed, DM2 can be both an epiphenomenon of PDAC and a risk factor. The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between overall survival (OS) and antidiabetic drugs in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and DM2.Data from 232 patients were collected retrospectively from 2014 to 2021. 174 from AOU Cagliari Medical Oncology and 58 from AOU Ancona Medical Oncology. All patients received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel first-line chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between DM2, anti-diabetic medications and overall survival. Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves.Median age was 68±9, 127 (55%) were male. 138/232 (59%) patients were not affected by DM2, 94/232 (41%) were affected by DM2. 57 were insulin-treated and 37 were metformin-treated. DM2 treated patients showed an higher median overall survival (26 vs 12 months, p = 0,0002). Among DM2 patients insulin-treated and metformin-treated showed an mOS of 21 months and 33 months, respectively.Results showed a correlation between treated DM2 and higher mOS in patients with mPDAC. Limitations due to retrospective data collection must be considered. Further studies in this setting are needed.

Biliary tract cancers are rare malignancies with a poor prognosis and scarce therapeutic strategies. The significance of BRCAness in this setting is already unknown.Tissue specimens of BTC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have been analyzed through the FOUNDATIONPne assay.72/150 (48%) BRCAness mutated and 78/150 (52.0%) wild type (WT) patients were included. The most commonly mutated genes in the BRCAness mutated group were: ARID1A (N = 32, 44%), CDKN2A (N = 23, 32%), KRAS/NRAS (N = 16, 22%), CDKN2B (N = 13, 18%), BRCA2 (N = 13, 18%), PBRM1 (N = 12, 17%), ATM (N = 11, 15%), FGFR2 (N = 10, 14%), TP53 (N = 8, 11%), IRS2 (N = 7, 10%), CREBBP (N = 7, 10%) (table 3, figure 1). At the univariate analysis BRCAness mutation was associated with longer median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.95; p = 0.0254); it was not associated with longer mOS but a trend toward a benefit in survival was found (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.50-1.19; p = 0.2388). Patients with BRCAness mutation showed a higher percentage of disease control rate (77.8 vs 67.9; p = 0.04) compared to patients WT. Multivariate analysis confirmed BRCAness mutation (HR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45-0.98; p = 0.0422) as independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and a positive trend was found for OS (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.53-1.33; p = 0.3652).BRCAness BTC patients showed a better PFS compared BRCAnessWT patients after exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy. Moreover, the OS curves' trend showed in our analysis suggests that BRCAness mutated patients could benefit from a maintenance therapy with PARPi.

As underlined in the minireview by Blomstrand

Background: Information about the adherence to scientific societies guidelines in the ‘real-world’ therapeutic management of oncological patients are lacking. This multicenter, prospective survey was aimed to improve the knowledge relative to 2017-2018 recommendations of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM). Patients and methods: Treatment-naive adult patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Group A received adjuvant therapy, group B received primary chemotherapy, and group C had metastatic disease. The results on patients accrued until 31 October 2019 with a mature follow-up were presented. Results: Since July 2017, 833 eligible patients of 923 (90%) were enrolled in 44 Italian centers. The median age was 69 years (range 36-89 years; 24% >75 years); 48% were female; 93% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score of 0 or 1; group A: 16%, group B: 30%; group C: 54%; 72% Nord, 13% Center, 15% South. In group A, guidelines adherence was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 59% to 76%]; 53% of patients received gemcitabine and 15% gemcitabine þ capecitabine; median CA19.9 was 29 (range 0-7300; not reported 15%); median survival was 36.4 months (95% CI 27.5-47.3 months). In group B, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 92% to 98%); 55% of patients received nab-paclitaxel þ gemcitabine, 27% FOLFIRINOX, 12% gemcitabine, and 3% clinical trial; median CA19.9 was 337 (range 0-20220; not reported 9%); median survival was 18.1 months (95% CI 15.6-19.9 months). In group C, guidelines adherence was 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%); 71% of patients received nabpaclitaxel þ gemcitabine, 16% gemcitabine, 8% FOLFIRINOX, and 4% clinical trial; liver and lung metastases were reported in 76% and 23% of patients, respectively; median CA19.9 value was 760 (range 0-1374500; not reported 9%); median survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 9.1-11.1 months). Conclusions: The GARIBALDI survey shows a very high rate of adherence to guidelines and survival outcome in line with the literature. CA19.9 testing should be enhanced; nutritional and psychological counseling represent an unmet need. Enrollment to assess adherence to updated AIOM guidelines is ongoing.

The evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly integrated into the management of diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer as it represents an innovative and minimally invasive biomarker that could allow us to reach clinical needs not met yet in randomized clinical trials. Recent research provided an interesting overview of the role of circulating tumor DNA in gastric, biliary, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer. Data regarding upper gastrointestinal tumors are currently not practice changing. Tumor detection rates are low in the early stages, while in advanced stages ctDNA is useful for molecular tracking evaluation. Most of the evidence comes from colorectal cancer studies, where ctDNA was evaluated both in the early and advanced stages with the post-surgery minimal residual disease assessment and the response assessment, respectively. ctDNA qualifies as a promising tool in the era of precision medicine, with potential applications in the entire management of gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further evidence is needed to establish which setting may be influenced greatly by liquid biopsy in clinical practice. ispartof: WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY vol:13 issue:12 pages:980-983 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) consist of a group of highly heterogeneous malignancies that are characterized by genomic differences among tumors from different anatomic sites. The current treatment for BTC includes surgery, chemotherapy, target therapy, and immunotherapy. Although surgery remains the primary option for localized disease, representing the only potential curative treatment, a high risk of recurrence cannot be neglected. Chemotherapy has been considered the standard of care for both advanced and metastatic disease and in adjuvant settings. However, drug resistance is a major obstacle associated with chemotherapy. The development of genetic testing technologies, including next‐generation sequencing, has opened the door for the identification of drug targets and candidate molecules. A series of preclinical studies has demonstrated the role of gene mutations, abnormal signaling pathways, and immunosuppression in the pathogenesis of BTC, laying the foundation for the application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. A variety of molecularly targeted agents, including pemigatinib, have shown promising survival benefits in patients with advanced disease. The rapidly evolving role of multimodal therapy represents the subject of this review., Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) consist of a group of highly heterogeneous malignancies, which are characterized by genomic differences among tumors from different anatomic sites. A series of preclinical studies have proven the role of gene mutations, abnormal signaling pathways, and immunosuppression in the pathogenesis of BTC, laying the foundation for the application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The disappointing response to conventional cytotoxic drugs along with the genetic heterogeneity of BTC led to both immunotherapy and targeted therapy–oriented research based on the genetic characterization of BTC.

Introduction In the past, targeted therapies have not shown positive results as they have been used without adequate molecular selection of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). This has led to an expansion of research on characteristics and molecular selection to identify new effective strategies in this setting. Improved knowledge of the molecular biology of these neoplasms has highlighted their extraordinary heterogeneity and has made it possible to identify targetable gene alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 gene fusions, and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations. The FDA recently approved ivosidenib and pemigatinib for the treatment of BTCs. Areas covered We review data in the literature regarding targeted therapies for the treatment of BTCs, as well as on the prospects deriving from the extraordinary molecular heterogeneity of these neoplasms. Expert opinion At present, it is essential to evaluate the expression of the genetic alterations expressed by these neoplasms to offer patients an increasingly personalized therapeutic approach. Studies are needed to better define the limits and potentials of targeted therapies and their role in the therapeutic algorithm to improve the poor prognosis of these patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with mismatch-repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability (dMMR-MSI-H). Unfortunately, a patient’s subgroup did not benefit from immunotherapy. Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX-2) would seem to influence immunotherapy’s sensitivity, promoting the chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 14 (CXCL14) expression. Therefore, we investigated CDX-2 role as a prognostic-predictive marker in patients with mCRC MSI-H. We retrospectively collected data from 14 MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the 12-month progression-free-survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The PFS rate at 12 months was 81% in CDX-2 positive patients vs 0% in CDX-2 negative patients (p = 0.0011). The median PFS was not reached (NR) in the CDX-2 positive group versus 2.07 months (95%CI 2.07–10.8) in CDX-2 negative patients (p = 0.0011). Median OS was NR in CDX-2-positive patients versus 2.17 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.17–18.7) in CDX2-negative patients (p = 0.026). All CDX-2-positive patients achieved a disease response, one of them a complete response. Among CDX-2-negative patients, one achieved stable disease, while the other progressed rapidly (ORR: 100% vs 0%, p = 0.0005; DCR: 100% vs 50%, p = 0.02). Twelve patients received 1st-line pembrolizumab (11 CDX-2 positive and 1 CDX-2 negative) not reaching median PFS, while two patients (1 CDX-2 positive and 1 CDX-2 negative) received 3rd-line pembrolizumab reaching a median PFS of 10.8 months (95% CI, 10.8–12.1; p = 0.036). Although our study reports results on a small population, the prognostic role of CDX-2 in CRC seems confirmed and could drive a promising predictive role in defining the population more sensitive to immunotherapy treatment. Modulating the CDX-2/CXCL14 axis in CDX-2-negative patients could help overcome primary resistance to immunotherapy.

Despite continued research, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the main causes of cancer death. Interest is growing in the role of the tumour suppressors breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2—typically associated with breast and ovarian cancer—in the pathogenesis of PDAC. Indeed, both germline and sporadic mutations in BRCA1/2 have been found to play a role in the development of PDAC. However, data regarding BRCA1/2-mutant PDAC are lacking. In this review, we aim to outline the specific landscape of BRCA-mutant PDAC, focusing on heritability, clinical features, differences between BRCA1 and 2 mutations and between germline and sporadic alterations, as well as established therapeutic strategies and those that are still under evaluation.

752 Background: Glucose and other metabolites (lactates and glutamine) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) may alter the activity of the immune system cells. Cancer cells consume glucose and its decrease in the TME affects the function of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Moreover, tumor-infiltrated immunosuppressive cells and vascular endothelial cells also deplete nutrients, in the TME, enhancing an immunosuppressive environment. On the basis of the results coming from our previous works regarding lymphocytes to monocytes ratio (LMr) and diabetes, suggesting a role for each of them as predictors of better outcomes, in this study we evaluate both of them in order to establish a possible role of them as outcomes predictive factors. Methods: Data from 228 patients (pts) were collected retrospectively from 2016 to 2021: 175 from the Medical Oncology Unit of University Hospital of Cagliari; 53 from the Medical Oncology Unit, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona. All pts had stage IV disease and received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel 1st line chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc package. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between treated DM2 and lymphocytes to monocytes ratio (LMr) ≥ 4 with outcomes. Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate analysis was performed taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, LMr, NLr, LDH, Ca19.9, and metastatic sites. Results: Median age was 68 (±9), 123/228 (54%) were male, 94/232 (40,6%) were affected by DM2 (insulin or metfomin-treated) and 138 (59,4%) pts were not affected by DM2. 52/228 (23%) pts had a LMr ≥ 4, 176/228 (77%) pts had a LMr < 4. In multivariate analysis, DM2 and LM ratio ≥ 4 were found to be independent factors associated with higher overall survival. Therefore, we divided the pts into 3 groups: co-presence DM2 and LM ≥ 4 (DM+LM+); absence of DM2 and LM ≥ 4 (DM-LM-); presence of DM2 or LM ≥ 4 (DM+LM- or DM-LM+). DM+LM+ demonstrated statistically significantly higher median OS than DM+LM-/DM-LM+ and DM-LM- (not reached versus 21 versus 9 months, respectively, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, DM+LM+ showed a statistically significant better median PFS than DM+LM-/DM-LM+ and DM-LM- (11 versus 9 versus 6 months, respectively, p = 0,0036). Conclusions: Results showed a correlation between pts with DM2/LMr ≥ 4 and better outcomes. This may suggest the presence of a link between glucose metabolism and lymphocytes activation. Antidiabetic medications could promote the inhibition of Warburg effect in tumor cells, and, consequently, provide a better glucose intake to extracellular microenvironment, and immune cells, including T lymphocytes. This process leads to a higher activity of T-cells and a better treatment response. Further studies are warranted.

Background Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare but highly aggressive tumours with poor prognosis, usually detected at advanced stages. Herein, we aimed at identifying BTC-specific DNA methylation alterations. Methods Study design included statistical power and sample size estimation. A genome-wide methylation study of an explorative cohort (50 BTC and ten matched non-tumoral tissue samples) has been performed. BTC-specific altered CpG islands were validated in over 180 samples (174 BTCs and 13 non-tumoral controls). The final biomarkers, selected by a machine-learning approach, were validated in independent tissue (18 BTCs, 14 matched non-tumoral samples) and bile (24 BTCs, five non-tumoral samples) replication series, using droplet digital PCR. Results We identified and successfully validated BTC-specific DNA methylation alterations in over 200 BTC samples. The two-biomarker panel, selected by an in-house algorithm, showed an AUC > 0.97. The best-performing biomarker (chr2:176993479-176995557), associated with HOXD8, a pivotal gene in cancer-related pathways, achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity in a new series of tissue and bile samples. Conclusions We identified a novel fully efficient BTC biomarker, associated with HOXD8 gene, detectable both in tissue and bile by a standardised assay ready-to-use in clinical trials also including samples from non-invasive matrices.

Introduction Despite available treatment options, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently lethal. Recent immunotherapy strategies have failed to yield any notable impact. Therefore, research is focussed on unearthing new drug targets and therapeutic strategies to tackle this malignancy and attain more positive outcomes for patients. Areas covered In this perspective article, we evaluate the main resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the approaches to circumvent them. We also offer an assessment of concluded and ongoing trials of PDAC immunotherapy. Literature research was performed on Pubmed accessible through keywords such as: 'pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,' 'immunotherapy,' 'immunotherapy resistance,' 'immune escape,' 'biomarkers.' Papers published between 2000 and 2021 were selected. Expert opinion The tumour microenvironment is a critical variable of treatment resistance because of its role as a physical barrier and inhibitory immune signalling. Promising therapeutic strategies appear to be a combination of immunotherapeutics with other targeted treatments. Going forward, predictive biomarkers are required to improve patient selection. Biomarker-driven trials could enhance approaches for assessing the role of immunotherapy in PDAC.

Andrea Casadei Gardini,1* Marco Puzzoni,2* Francesco Montagnani,3* Giorgia Marisi,4* Emiliano Tamburini,5 Alessandro Cucchetti,6,7 Leonardo Solaini,6,7 Francesco Giuseppe Foschi,8 Fabio Conti,8 Giorgio Ercolani,6,7 Stefano Cascinu,1 Mario Scartozzi21Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; 2Department of Medical Oncology, Cagliari University Hospital, SS 554 Monserrato, CA, Italy; 3Department of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria locale di Biella, Ponderano, Italy; 4Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Italy; 5Department of Medical Oncology, Card. G. Panico Hospital of Tricase, 73039 Tricase, Italy; 6Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy; 7General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; 8Department of Internal Medicine, Degli Infermi Hospital, Faenza 48018, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this workPurpose: Sorafenib is the only approved drug in first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, the Phase III REFLECT trial proved lenvatinib not inferior to sorafenib, potentially establishing a new standard of care in this setting. The study showed that both have similar overall survivals, yet with longer time to progression for lenvatinib. Currently, the selection of one or other is not based on clinical or biological parameters for this reason we performed a network meta-analysis and we also analyzed the REFLECT trial and its implications in the current and future clinical practice.Materials and methods: We performed the meta-analysis according to the Prisma statement recommendations. HR was the measure of association for time to progression and overall survival. The pooled analysis of HR was performed using a random effect model, fixing a 5% error as index of statistical significance.Results: For HBV-positive patients, there was a clear trend in favor of lenvatinib over sorafenib (HR 0.82 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.60–1.15). For HCV-positive no differences between lenvatinib and sorafenib were observed (HR 0.91 95% CrI 0.41–2.01). The data showed that lenvatinib could be the best drug for HBV-positive patients in 59% of cases compared to only 1% of patients treated with sorafenib.Conclusion: The identification of clinical or biological markers that could predict response or resistance to treatments is needed to guide treatment decision. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that the etiology is a good candidate and this result should be validated in a specific trial.Keywords: sorafenib, hepatocellular carcinoma, randomized trial, biomarkers, erlotinib, linifanib, sunitinib, brivanib

4153 Background: Despite the most recent therapeutic achievements, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognosis and response to treatments. Among the most investigated prognostic biomarkers, the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMr) is gaining increasing interest in literature, mostly in hematological malignancies, breast cancer, bladder cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In these settings, a higher LMr allows identifying a subset of patients with a better prognosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the role of the LMr as a prognostic factor in patients affected by metastatic PDAC and to find a cut-off value able to identify a subset of patients with better prognosis and possibly susceptible to other therapeutic options. Methods: Data from 228 patients were collected retrospectively from 2014 to 2021. 175 from the Department of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital of Cagliari and 53 from the Oncology Clinic - University Hospital of Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona. All patients had metastatic PDAC and blood samples were collected before starting first-line chemotherapy. The cut-off value for LMr was calculated according to the ROC curves at 6, 12, and 18 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were then obtained for the evaluation of survivals. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed, taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, NL ratio, metastatic sites, Ca19.9 and LDH. Results: The median age was 68 y.o. (range 39-84 y.o.), 123 (54%) were males. Cut off value obtained for LMR, was 4. 156 (68,4%) patients had an LMr < 4 and 72 (31,6%) patients had an LMR ≥ 4. Patients with a ratio ≥ 4 showed a statistically significant difference in terms of median overall survival compared to patients with a ratio < 4 (23 months versus 11 months, p < 0.0001). First-line median progression-free survival was also different in patients with a value greater than or equal to 4 (11 months versus 6 months, p = 0.005), suggesting a better treatment response in the first group of patients. Finally, multivariate analysis showed that LMR ≥ 4 is an independent prognostic factor for OS ( p = 0.0005). Conclusions: The results of our study show that the lymphocyte to monocyte ratio could be an important prognostic factor in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, although the limitations of a retrospective study should be considered. Furthermore, these findings suggest the active role of the immune response in limiting disease progression, indicating a group of patients who could benefit most from a target or combined immunotherapy treatment.

e16301 Background: The association between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has long been evaluated. Indeed, DM2 can be both an epiphenomenon of PDAC and a risk factor. However, the data on the influence of DM2 and concomitant drug therapy in the progression of pancreatic neoplasms are conflicting. The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between overall survival (OS) and antidiabetic drugs in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and DM2. Methods: Data from 232 patients were collected retrospectively from 2014 to 2021. 174 from the Department of Medical Oncology of the University Hospital of Cagliari and 58 from the Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona. All patients had stage IV disease and received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel first-line chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was performed with the MedCalc package. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between DM2, anti-diabetic medications (ADMs) and median overall survival (mOS). Survival distribution was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed, taking into consideration the following prognostic factors: sex, ECOG-PS, LDH, Ca19.9, and metastatic sites. Results: The median age was 69 y.o. (range 40-84 y.o.), 127 (54,7%) were male. All patients received first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. 138 (59,4%) patients were not affected by DM2, 94/232 (40,6%) were affected by DM2. Among DM2 patients, 57 (%) were insulin-treated and 37 (%) were metformin-treated. DM2 patients showed a statistically significant higher median overall survival (26 versus 11 months, 95% CI, p = 0,0002). Furthermore, among DM2 patients insulin-treated and metformin-treated showed a mOS of 21 months and 33 months, respectively (95% CI, p = 0.0002). Finally, multivariate analysis showed that treated-DM2 is an independent prognostic factor ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: The results of our study showed a correlation between DM2 on treatment (with insulin or metformin) and higher mOSin patients with metastatic PDAC. However, the limitations due to retrospective data collection must be considered. The mechanisms underlying these findings could be explained by maintaining optimal insulin concentration and good glycemic control during treatments, or by the activity of anti-diabetic medication in neoplastic tissues. However, further studies in this setting are needed.

Background Regorafenib is a key agent in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but no validated factors predicting longer survival are available. Patients and Methods REALITY was a retrospective multicenter trial in regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with overall survival (OS) ≥ 6 months. We aimed to assess the association between clinical parameters and outcome to define a panel identifying long term survivors among regorafenib candidates. Primary and secondary endpoints were OS and progression free survival (PFS), respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with MedCalc (survival distribution: Kaplan-Meier; survival comparison: log-rank test; independent role of significant variables at univariate analysis: logistic regression). Results Hundred regorafenib-treated mCRC patients with OS ≥ 6 months were enrolled. Median OS was 11.5 m (95%CI:9.60-12.96); median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI:3.43-43.03). The absence of liver progression and of dose and/or schedule changes during the first 4 cycles (mainly for good tolerability) were independently correlated at multivariate analysis with OS (Exp(b)1.8869, P= .0277and Exp(b)2.2000, P = .0313) and PFS (Exp(b)2.1583, P = .0065 and Exp(b)2.3036, P= .0169). Patients with neither of these variables had a significantly improved OS (n = 14, 20.8 months; 95% CI:12.967-55.267) versus others (n = 86, 10 months; 95% CI:8.367-12.167; HR = 0.4902, P = .0045) and PFS (11.3 months, 95%CI:4.267-35.8 vs. 3.9 months, 95% CI:3.167-43.033; HR = 0.4648, P = .0086). Conclusion These 2 factors might allow clinicians to better identify patients more likely to benefit from regorafenib. Toxicity management remains crucial.

Background Preclinical and clinical data indicate that p53 expression might modulate the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), influencing response/resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. However, the association between p53 status and clinical outcome has not been clarified yet. Objective In our study, we evaluated the role of p53 expression in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving irinotecan/cetuximab in an exploratory and a validation cohort. Patients and Methods p53 expression was analysed in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC receiving second-line or third-line irinotecan/cetuximab. Survival distribution was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method, while the log-rank test was used for survival comparison. Results Among 120 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC included in our analysis, 52 (59%) and 19 (59%) patients showed p53 overexpression in the exploratory and validation cohort, respectively. In the exploratory cohort, low p53 expression was correlated with better median progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.39; p < 0.0001), median overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.23; p < 0.0001) and response rate (p < 0.0001). These results were confirmed by data of the validation cohort where we observed better median progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.48; p = 0.0399), median overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.26; p = 0.0027) and response rate (p =0.0007) in patients with p53 normal expression mCRC. Conclusions In our study, p53 overexpression was associated with anti-EGFR treatment resistance in patients with RAS/BRAF WT mCRC, as confirmed in a validation cohort. Larger studies are needed to validate the role of p53 and investigate EGFR cross-talk in these patients.

Introduction : Biliary tract cancer represents a heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by dismal prognosis and scarce therapeutic options. Area covered In the last years a growing interest in BTCs pathology has emerged, thus highlighting a significant heterogeneity of the pathways underlying the carcinogenesis process, from both a molecular and genomic point of view. A better understanding of these differences is mandatory in order to deepen the behavior of this complex disease, as well as to identify new targetable target mutations, with the aim to improve the survival outcomes. The authors decided to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent highlights on BTCs, with a special focus on the genetic, epigenetic and molecular alterations which may have an interesting clinical application in the next future. Expert opinion In the last years, the efforts resulted from international collaborations have led to the identification of new promising targets for precision medicine approaches in the BTC setting. Further investigations and prospective trials are needed, but the hope is that these new knowledge in cooperation with the new technologies and procedures including bio-molecular and genomic analysis as well radiomic studies, will enrich the therapeutic armamentarium thus improving the survival outcomes in a such lethal and complex disease.

Background Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) has recently become the gold standard treatment for fit patients with operable gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, getting a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 45%, over 23% with surgery alone. Methods RealFLOT is an Italian, multicentric, observational trial, collecting data from patients with resectable GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT. Aim of the study was to describe feasibility and safety of FLOT, pathological complete response rate (pCR), surgical outcomes and overall response rate (ORR) in an unselected real-world population. Additional analyses evaluated the correlation between pCR and survival and the prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Results Of 206 patients enrolled that received perioperative FLOT at 15 Italian centers, 124 (60.2%) received at least 4 full-dose cycles, 190 (92.2%) underwent surgery, and 142 (68.9%) started the postoperative phase. Among patients who started the postoperative phase, 105 (51.0%) received FLOT, while 37 (18%) received de-intensified regimens, depending on clinical condition or previous toxicities. pCR was achieved in 7.3% of cases. Safety profile was consistent with literature. Neutropenia was the most common G 3–4 adverse event (AE): 19.9% in the preoperative phase and 16.9% in the postoperative phase. No toxic death was observed and 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.0%. ORR was 45.6% and disease control rate (DCR) was 94.2%. Disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were significantly longer in case of pCR (p = 0.009 and p = 0.023, respectively). A trend towards better DFS was observed among MSI-H patients. Conclusions These real-world data confirm the feasibility of FLOT in an unselected population, representative of the clinical practice. pCR rate was lower than expected, nevertheless we confirm pCR as a predictive parameter of survival. In addition, MSI-H status seems to be a positive prognostic marker also in patients treated with taxane-containing triplets.

182 Background: Only few data on microsatellite instability in rectal cancer are available in literature, and dMMR role in pre-operative chemoradiotherapy response is under debate. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency and therapeutic implications of dMMR status in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer belonging to our Center. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 231 patients belonging to the Medical Oncology Unit of the University Hospital of Cagliari from 2011 to 2021. All patients were affected by locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (cT3-4 +/- N1-2). All patients included in the study underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment with capecitabine and RT long course (total dose of Gy 50.4) and subsequently underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Mismatch repair (MMR) expression was evaluated through immunohistochemistry on surgical samples. Results: Of the 231 patients, 213 were suitable for final analyzes. Patients median age was 68 years (range 34-89). 145/201 were male and 68 were female. 66 (31%) had stage II disease and 147 (69%) had stage III disease. Considering MMR, 205/213 (96%) patients had proficient mismatch repair (pMMR), while 8/213 (4%) had dMMR. In dMMR patients defective proteins were: MSH2 in 4 patients, MLH1 and PMS2 combined in 2 patients and MSH6 in 2 patient. dMMR patients showed, unlike pMMR patients, poor or no response to chemoradiotherapy. Responses were assessed through TRG evaluation (Ryan and Dworak scoring systems) on the primary tumour. 5 patients presented a TRG-3 and 3 patients showed a TRG-4, according to Ryan score. All of them had a grade 1 regression, according to Dworak. Conclusions: The results of our study, albeit with limitations related to the retrospective nature and the limited number of dMMR cases, might indicate a correlation between microsatellite instability and little or no response to preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. It would be useful to analyze the data prospectively and further evaluate MMR as a predictor of response to combined chemo-radiotherapy.[Table: see text]

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver cancer. Immunotherapy has been explored in this disease in order to improve survival outcomes. Nowadays, scientific research is focusing especially on immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), as single-agent or in combination with other immunotherapy agents, target therapies, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other agents targeting specific molecular pathways. Other immunotherapy strategies have been assessed or are under investigation in advanced HCC, namely cytokines, adoptive cell therapy, oncolytic virus, cancer vaccines. Each treatment presents specific efficacy and toxicity profiles, strictly related to their mechanism of action and to advanced HCC tumour microenvironment (TME). The aim of this review is to outline the state-of-the-art of immunotherapy in advanced HCC treatment, highlighting data on already investigated treatment strategies, safety and toxicity (including HBV/HCV-related HCC), and ongoing clinical trials focusing on new promising therapeutic weapons.

Background: In the last decade, a series of analyses failed to identify predictive biomarkers of resistance/susceptibility for anti-angiogenic drugs in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted an exploratory preplanned analysis of serum pro-angiogenic factors (SErum aNgiogenesis-cenTRAL) in 72 mCRC patients enrolled in the phase II CENTRAL (ColorEctalavastiNTRiAlLdh) trial, with the aim to identify potential predictive factors for sensitivity/resistance to first line folinic acid-fluorouracil-irinotecan regimen (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab. Methods: First-line FOLFIRI/bevacizumab patients were prospectively assessed for the following circulating pro-angiogenic factors, evaluated with ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)-based technique at baseline and at every cycle: Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1), placental derived growth factor (PlGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3), interleukin-8 (IL-8). Results: Changes in circulating FGF-2 levels among different blood samples seemed to correlate with clinical outcome. Patients who experienced an increase in FGF-2 levels at the second cycle of chemotherapy compared to baseline, had a median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) of 12.85 vs. 7.57 months (Hazard Ratio&mdash, HR: 0.73, 95% Confidence Interval&mdash, CI: 0.43-1.27, p = 0.23). Similar results were seen when comparing FGF-2 concentrations between baseline and eight-week time point (mPFS 12.98 vs. 8.00 months, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.46&ndash, 1.33, p = 0.35). Conclusions: Our pre-planned, prospective analysis suggests that circulating FGF-2 levels&rsquo, early increase could be used as a marker to identify patients who are more likely to gain benefit from FOLFIRI/bevacizumab first-line therapy.

Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) ± chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment–related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line.

Free triiodothyronine (FT3)/free thyroxine (FT4) ratio is an index estimating the peripheral activity of thyroid hormones. In a previous experience, we identified a prognostic role for FT3/FT4 ratio in chemorefractory patients treated with regorafenib. Therefore, we planned this post hoc analysis of the phase III CORRECT trial of regorafenib versus placebo.Seven hundred fifty-eight out of 760 randomised patients (503 in the regorafenib and 255 in the placebo arm) were evaluable for the present analyses, based on availability of FT3 and FT4 baseline values. Co-primary objectives were to explore the predictive role of FT3/FT4 ratio in patients treated with regorafenib compared with placebo and to validate the prognostic value of FT3/FT4 ratio in the CORRECT trial.For patients randomised to regorafenib, median overall survival (OS) was 4.0, 7.5 and 9.8 months in low, intermediate and high FT3/FT4 ratio subgroups, respectively. Hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.40 (p 0.0001) when comparing intermediate versus low and 0.32 (p 0.0001) when comparing high versus low FT3/FT4 ratio. In the placebo arm, median OS was 3.3, 5.6 and 7.7 months, in the three subgroups. HR for OS was 0.47 (p 0.0001) when comparing intermediate versus low and 0.33 (p 0.0001) when comparing high versus low. FT3/FT4 ratio retained its association with OS in the multivariate model in both arms.While rejecting the predictive effect of baseline FT3/FT4 ratio, present data strengthen the prognostic role of the ratio, pave the way for direct clinical application, underline the need for a better biological understanding and suggest possible therapeutic implications for thyroid hormones.

Introduction: The association between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has long been evaluated and the role of antidiabetic medications such as metformin has also been investigated. The objective of this study was to examine the association between insulin use and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced PDAC and DM2. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 164 patients, including an exploratory cohort of 96 patients from Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Italy, and a validation cohort of 68 patients from Medical Oncology of Modena University Hospital. Patients had metastatic disease and received a first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and, subsequently, a second-line fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapy. We performed univariate analysis to evaluate correlation between long-term diabetes and overall survival. Then we performed multivariate analysis, adjusting for sex, metastatic sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, Ca19.9 levels, N/L ratio, and lactate dehydrogenase levels at diagnosis, to confirm the independence of the variable. Results: In the exploratory cohort, DM2 was significantly associated with higher median OS at univariate analysis (16 vs 10 months; p = 0.004). This result was confirmed by validation cohort (11 months vs 6 months; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, insulin-treated patients compared with non diabetic patients showed a significantly increased survival of 4.6 months ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with insulin-treated metastatic PDAC showed better OS than non diabetic patients, as demonstrated by both cohorts. The correlation between OS and insulin-treated DM2 should be investigated further through a prospective clinical trial.

Background The impact of free triiodothyronine (FT3)/free thyroxine (FT4) ratio on survival in hospitalized geriatric patients was recently described. Up today, there are no data regarding the prognostic role of FT3/FT4 ratio in patients with advanced cancer. We evaluated the impact of FT3/FT4 ratio on survival in patients with refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with regorafenib. Methods Patients with metastatic CRC treated with regorafenib with available clinical data and baseline measurement of FT3, FT4, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were considered eligible. Exploratory analyses included subjects treated at Istituto Oncologico Veneto. A confirmatory analysis was planned based on FT3/FT4 ratio tertile results, and a validation cohort was built on data retrieved from University of Cagliari. Results In an exploratory cohort, the median overall survival in patients with low, intermediate, and high FT3/FT4 ratios, according to tertiles' value, was 4.8, 5.0, and 7.6 months, respectively (P = .003). The differences were significant in the multivariate model (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.68; P = .0003). Confirmatory results were obtained in a validation cohort, both in univariate (P = .0002) and in multivariate (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.88; P = .0118) models. Conclusions High baseline FT3/FT4 ratio is strongly associated to better outcome in patients with progressive metastatic CRC treated with regorafenib. Further investigations are ongoing to draw definitive conclusions regarding a potential predictive effect.

BRAF mutant colorectal cancer (BRAF MT CRC) is a unique category of colorectal tumour with peculiar molecular, pathological and clinical features and poor prognosis; despite recent research, BRAF mutation predictive value and standard treatment of BRAF MT CRC still have to be defined. In this review, we focused on this challenging topic. Areas covered: The potential use of BRAF mutational status among recent additional prognostic and predictive indicators and current treatment strategy in use in these patients is discussed. Moreover, implications and characteristics of new BRAF mutations other than BRAFV600E are analyzed. An in-deep outlook on the immediate future for clinical and translational research in this subgroup of patients is also presented, such as combination therapy with agents targeting the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and standard chemotherapy in order to overcome resistance. We performed a research on Pubmed typing 'BRAF mutation', 'colorectal cancer', 'predictive and prognostic value', 'targeted therapy', 'BRAF inhibition'. Expert commentary: BRAFV600E mutation represents a strong, independent negative prognostic factor in II-III stage MSS CRC and mCRC. The best treatment still has to be identified; currently, in good performance status patients, an intensive-chemotherapy-combination remains the standard of care. Further investigations are warranted to explore new horizons to change BRAF MT mCRC outcomes.

3577 Background: The rechallenge with EGFR inhibitors represents an emerging strategy for anti-EGFR pre-treated patients with RAS wild type colorectal cancer (CRC). Unfortunately definitive selection criteria for anti-EGFR rechallenge in this setting are lacking. Very recently RAS wild type status on circulating tumor DNA (ct-DNA) at the time of rechallenge along with already known clinical criteria emerged as a potential watershed for this strategy. In the present study we explored liquid biopsy-driven anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy in the clinical practice for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Ct-DNA from RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic CRC patients previously treated with an anti-EGFR containing therapy was analyzed for RAS/BRAF mutations with the aim to evaluate the rechallenge strategy with anti-EGFR. The ct-DNA was analyzed for RAS-BRAF mutations using pyro-sequencing (PyroMark Q24 MDx Workstation) and nucleotide sequencing (Genetic Analyzer ABI3130) assays. Real-time PCR (Idylla) and droplet digital PCR (QX200 System) were performed to confirm the RAS-BRAF mutation status. Several clinical variables including previous response to anti EGFR containing therapy, tumor sidedness and anti-EGFR free interval were evaluated in relation to outcome. Tumor response evaluation was performed according to RECIST 1.1. Differences between categorical variables were evaluated using the Fisher’s exact test. Survival probability over time was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Significant differences in the probability of survival between the strata were evaluated by log-rank test. Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. All patients were tested for RAS-BRAF mutations in ct-DNA. Fourteen patients (70%) showed a RAS-BRAF WT molecular profile, six patients (30%) showed a KRAS mutation. All the patients with ct-DNA RAS-BRAF WT profile underwent rechallenge with anti-EGFR. In details 11 patients (78.6%) underwent irinotecan+ cetuximab treatment, whereas 3 patients (21.4%) underwent panitumumab monotherapy. As for the outcome results to the rechallenge strategy, the median OS was 7 months (95% CI 5.0 to 13.0), the median PFS was 3 months (95% CI 2.0 to 6.0), the ORR was 27.3% with a DCR of 54.5%. Among the clinical variables evaluated as putative predictive/prognostic factors, previous response to anti-EGFR treatment was related to a not statistically significant improved OS (12 months vs 5 months HR:0.19 p: 0.06) and to a statistically significant improved ORR (75% vs 0% p:0.03). Conclusions: The rechallenge strategy with anti-EGFR confirmed to be feasible in clinical practice. The clinical outcome resulted consistent with the literature data. In addition to the molecular selection through the analysis of ct-DNA for RAS, previous response to anti EGFR treatment is confirmed as a prospective selection criteria for this therapeutic option.