Search

From the beginnings of ITU-T H.261 to H.265 (HEVC), each new video coding standard has aimed at halving the bitrate at the same perceptual quality by redundancy and irrelevancy reduction. Each improvement has been explained by comparably small changes in the video coding toolset. This contribution aims at starting the Quality of Experience (QoE) analysis of the accumulated improvements over the last thirty years. Based on an overview of the changes in the coding tools, we analyze the changes in the quantized residual information. Visual comparison and statistical measures are performed and some interpretations are provided towards explaining how irrelevancy reduction may have led to such a huge reduction in bitrate. The interpretation of the results in terms of QoE paves the way towards an understanding of the coding tools in terms of visual quality. It may help in understanding how the irrelevancy reduction has been improved over the decades. Understanding how the differences of the residuals relate to known or yet unknown properties of the human visual system, may enable a closer collaboration between perception research and video compression research.

Several video quality metrics (VQMs) have been proposed in many publications to predict how humans perceive video quality. It is common to observe significant disagreements amongst the quality predictions of these VQMs for the same video sequence. Following an extensive literature search, we found no publicised work that has investigated if such disagreements convey useful information on the accuracy of VQMs. Herein, a measure for quantifying the disagreement between VQMs is proposed. A small-scale subjective study is carried out to assess the effectiveness of our proposal. In particular, the proposed disagreement measure is shown to be extremely effective in determining whether the quality of any given processed video sequence (PVS) can be accurately predicted by the VQMs. This type of information is particularly useful for identifying video sequences that are likely to degrade the end-user’s quality of experience (QoE). Our proposal is also useful in selecting the most effective PVSs to be employed in a subjective test. We show that the proposed disagreement measure can be effectively predicted from bitstream features. This establishes a link between the capability to accurately assess the quality of a PVS and the way it is encoded. In addition, an analysis is conducted to compare the performances of some well-known and widely used open-source metrics and two proprietary metrics. The two proprietary metrics are used by a large media company for enhancing its delivery pipeline. The outcome of this comparison highlights the suitability of the open-source VQM, Video Multi-method Assessment Fusion (VMAF), as a good benchmark quality measure for both the industrial and academic environments.

The coding tools used in image and video encoders aim at high perceptual quality for low bitrates. Analyzing the results of the encoders in terms of quantization parameter, image partitioning, prediction modes or residuals may provide important insight into the link between those tools and the human perception. As a first step, this contribution analyzes the possibility to transcode reference images of three well-known image databases, i.e. IRCCyN/IVC, LIVE and TID2013, from their original, older formats to HEVC; thus creating a homogeneous database of 327 HEVC encoded images accompanied with bitstream parameters and values obtained from objective and subjective assessments. Secondly, it analyzes some of the HEVC intra coding parameters regarding their influence on the image quality by using machine learning, namely Support Vector Machine - Regression.

This work presents a framework to facilitate reproducibility of research in video quality evaluation. Its initial version is built around the JEG-Hybrid database of HEVC coded video sequences. The framework is modular, organized in the form of pipelined activities, which range from the tools needed to generate the whole database from reference signals up to the analysis of the video quality measures already present in the database. Researchers can re-run, modify and extend any module, starting from any point in the pipeline, while always achieving perfect reproducibility of the results. The modularity of the structure allows to work on subsets of the database since for some analysis this might be too computationally intensive. To this purpose, the framework also includes a software module to compute interesting subsets, in terms of coding conditions, of the whole database. An example shows how the framework can be used to investigate how the small differences in the definition of the widespread PSNR metric can yield very different results, discussed in more details in our accompanying research paper Aldahdooh et al. (0000). This further underlines the importance of reproducibility to allow comparing different research work with high confidence. To the best of our knowledge, this framework is the first attempt to bring exact reproducibility end-to-end in the context of video quality evaluation research. Keywords: Reproducible research, Large database analysis, Video quality