Search

Objectives Numerous biological variation (BV) studies have been performed over the years, but the quality of these studies vary. The objectives of this study were to perform a systematic review and critical appraisal of BV studies on glycosylated albumin and to deliver updated BV estimates for glucose and HbA1c, including recently published high-quality studies such as the European Biological Variation study (EuBIVAS). Methods Systematic literature searches were performed to identify BV studies. Nine publications not included in a previous review were identified; four for glycosylated albumin, three for glucose, and three for HbA1c. Relevant studies were appraised by the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC). Global BV estimates were derived by meta-analysis of BIVAC-compliant studies in healthy subjects with similar study design. Results One study received BIVAC grade A, 2B, and 6C. In most cases, the C-grade was associated with deficiencies in statistical analysis. BV estimates for glycosylated albumin were: CVI=1.4% (1.2–2.1) and CVG=5.7% (4.7–10.6), whereas estimates for HbA1c, CVI=1.2% (0.3–2.5), CVG=5.4% (3.3–7.3), and glucose, CVI=5.0% (4.1–12.0), CVG=8.1% (2.7–10.8) did not differ from previously published global estimates. Conclusions The critical appraisal and rating of BV studies according to their methodological quality, followed by a meta-analysis, generate robust, and reliable BV estimates. This study delivers updated and evidence-based BV estimates for glycosylated albumin, glucose and HbA1c.

Objectives The estimates of biological variation (BV) have traditionally been determined using direct methods, which present limitations. In response to this issue, two papers have been published addressing these limitations by employing indirect methods. Here, we present a new procedure, based on indirect methods that analyses data collected within a multicenter pilot study. Using this method, we obtain CVI estimates and calculate confidence intervals (CI), using the EFLM-BVD CVI estimates as gold standard for comparison. Methods Data were collected over a 18-month period for 7 measurands, from 3 Spanish hospitals; inclusion criteria: patients 18–75 years with more than two determinations. For each measurand, four different strategies were carried out based on the coefficient of variation ratio (rCoeV) and based on the use of the bootstrap method (OS1, RS2 and RS3). RS2 and RS3 use symmetry reference change value (RCV) to clean database. Results RS2 and RS3 had the best correlation for the CVI estimates with respect to EFLM-BVD. RS2 used the symmetric RCV value without eliminating outliers, while RS3 combined RCV and outliers. When using the rCoeV and OS1 strategies, an overestimation of the CVI value was obtained. Conclusions Our study presents a new strategy for obtaining robust CVI estimates using an indirect method together with the value of symmetric RCV to select the target population. The CVI estimates obtained show a good correlation with those published in the EFLM-BVD database. Furthermore, our strategy can resolve some of the limitations encountered when using direct methods such as calculating confidence intervals.

Resumen Introducción El objetivo de este estudio es comprobar la evolución de las especificaciones de la prestación analítica (EPA) utilizadas en programas de garantía externa de la calidad (EQA) y el papel de un programa de categoría 1 en la vigilancia de la estandarización de la prestación de los laboratorios clínicos en España. Métodos Se ha revisado la bibliografía sobre tipos de especificaciones de la calidad usados en programas de otros países y se ha comprobado su evolución; se ha comparado el posible impacto de distintas EPA empleadas en ocho países en la toma de decisiones clínicas con tres ejemplos de magnitudes: sodio, tirotropina (TSH) y tiempo de tromboplastina parcial activado (TTPA). Resultados Se ha evidenciado la estandarización entre métodos analíticos comprobando si los resultados medios se desvían respecto al valor de referencia certificado del control dentro de las EPA derivadas de la variación biológica (VB). Las EPA usadas en EQA han evolucionado desde el estado del arte hacia la VB. Si se aplican los resultados que se aceptarían con algunas EPA se podrían producir decisiones clínicas erróneas. Conclusiónes En España, solo 2 de las 18 magnitudes biológicas estudiadas se pueden considerar bien estandarizadas. Sería necesaria una colaboración más estrecha entre los laboratorios y proveedores de sistemas analíticos para resolver las discrepancias.

Resumen Objetivos A lo largo de los años se han publicado numerosos artículos sobre variación biológica (VB) de diferente calidad. Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron realizar una revisión sistemática y una evaluación crítica de los estudios de VB para albúmina glicosilada y proporcionar datos actualizados de VB para glucosa y HbA1c, incluyendo prestigiosos estudios recientemente publicados como el Estudio de Variación Biológica Europea (EuBIVAS). Métodos Se hizo una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática para identificar estudios sobre VB, encontrándose 9 estudios no incluidos en la primera revisión: 4 para albúmina glicosilada, 3 para glucosa y 3 para HbA1c. Se realizó una evaluación crítica de los estudios relevantes, utilizando la herramienta Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC). Se obtuvieron los estimados globales de VB mediante meta-análisis de los estudios que cumplían los requisitos BIVAC, realizados en individuos sanos con estudios de diseño similar. Resultados Un estudio recibió el grado A, dos el B y 6 el C. en la mayoría de los casos el grado C se asoció a deficiencias en el análisis estadístico de los datos. Los estimados de VB para albúmina glicosilada fueron: CVI = 1,4%(1,2–2,1) y CVG = 5,7%(4,7–10,6); para HbA1c, CVI = 1,2%(0,3–2,5), CVG = 5,4%(3,3–7,3) y para glucosa, CVI = 5,0%(4,1–12,0), CVG = 8,1%(2,7–10,8) no difirieron de los estimados globales previamente descritos. Conclusiones La evaluación crítica y clasificación de los estudios de VB a tenor de su calidad metodológica, seguido de un meta-análisis, genera estimados de VB robustos y fiables. Este estudio proporciona datos de VB para albúmina glicolisada, glucosa y HbA1c actualizados y basados en la evidencia científica.

Background Objective interpretation of laboratory test results used to diagnose and monitor diabetes mellitus in part requires the application of biological variation data (BVD). The quality of published BVD has been questioned. The aim of this study was to quality assess publications reporting BVD for diabetes-related analytes using the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC); to assess whether published BVD are fit for purpose and whether the study design and population attributes influence BVD estimates and to undertake a meta-analysis of the BVD from BIVAC-assessed publications. Methods Publications reporting data for glucose, HbA1c, adiponectin, C-peptide, fructosamine, insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), insulin, lactate and pyruvate were identified using a systematic literature search. These publications were assessed using the BIVAC, receiving grades A, B, C or D, where A is of highest quality. A meta-analysis of the BVD from the assessed studies utilised weightings based upon BIVAC grades and the width of the data confidence intervals to generate global BVD estimates. Results BIVAC assessment of 47 publications delivered 1 A, 3 B, 39C and 4 D gradings. Publications relating to adiponectin, C-peptide, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, lactate and pyruvate were all assessed as grade C. Meta-analysis enabled global BV estimates for all analytes except pyruvate, lactate and fructosamine. Conclusions This study delivers updated and evidence-based BV estimates for diabetes-related analytes. There remains a need for delivery of new high-quality BV studies for several clinically important analytes.

Background The objective of the present study was to examine the evolution of the analytical performance specifications (APS) used in External Quality Assurance (EQA) schemes, as well as the efficacy of a category 1 EQA scheme in monitoring the harmonization of clinical laboratory results in Spain. Methods A review of the literature on the types of quality specifications used in schemes in other countries and their evolution was performed. In addition, a comparative analysis of the potential impact that different APS from eight countries had on clinical decision-making was made based on three measurands: sodium, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Results Harmonization of analytical methods was demonstrated by assessing whether average results deviated from the certified reference value of control materials within the APS derived from biological variation (BV). The APS used in EQA have evolved from state-of-the-art models to BV. Poor clinical decision-making would occur if the results accepted by some APS were applied. Conclusions In Spain, only 2 of the 18 measurands studied are considered to be well harmonized. Closer collaboration between laboratories and analytical system providers would be required to resolve discrepancies.

A proposal to calculate and use the reference change value (RCV) as an objective guide for interpreting the numerical results obtained in clinical laboratory serial testing is introduced in this study.A database showing the results of a compilation of 191 publications on biological variation and including information on a number of analytes provided the standardized criterion based on biology for calculating the RCVs.For each of the 261 analytes included in the study, the RCV was determined using Harris's formula, replacing analytical imprecision with the desirable specification of analytical quality based on half the within-subject biological variation at 95% probability levels. The result is a guide for a common criterion to identify clinically significant changes in serial results.The RCV concept is an approach that can be offered by laboratories to assess changes in serial results. The RCV data in this study are presented as a point of departure for a widely applicable objective guide to interpret changes in serial results.

Introduction Current external quality assurance schemes have been classified into six categories, according to their ability to verify the degree of standardization of the participating measurement procedures. SKML (Netherlands) is a Category 1 EQA scheme (commutable EQA materials with values assigned by reference methods), whereas SEQC (Spain) is a Category 5 scheme (replicate analyses of non-commutable materials with no values assigned by reference methods). Aim The results obtained by a group of Spanish laboratories participating in a pilot study organized by SKML are examined, with the aim of pointing out the improvements over our current scheme that a Category 1 program could provide. Method Imprecision and bias are calculated for each analyte and laboratory, and compared with quality specifications derived from biological variation. Results Of the 26 analytes studied, 9 had results comparable with those from reference methods, and 10 analytes did not have comparable results. The remaining 7 analytes measured did not have available reference method values, and in these cases, comparison with the peer group showed comparable results. The reasons for disagreement in the second group can be summarized as: use of non-standard methods (IFCC without exogenous pyridoxal phosphate for AST and ALT, Jaffe kinetic at low-normal creatinine concentrations and with eGFR); non-commutability of the reference material used to assign values to the routine calibrator (calcium, magnesium and sodium); use of reference materials without established commutability instead of reference methods for AST and GGT, and lack of a systematic effort by manufacturers to harmonize results. Conclusions Results obtained in this work demonstrate the important role of external quality assurance programs using commutable materials with values assigned by reference methods to correctly monitor the standardization of laboratory tests with consequent minimization of risk to patients.

The aim of this communication is to highlight the specific aspects of external quality assessment schemes that need to be discussed in a European context: target values, transferability of results and accredit of laboratories. The Spanish situation is presented here. The most reliable way to provide target values is to analyse the control samples by reference methods. However, it is not possible for the majority of national schemes and other approaches are presently used: the verification of consensus means is a practicable solution adopted in Spain. An initial network involving selected routine laboratories has been developed, to attain transferability of results. The traceability of routine calibrators from certified reference materials should be demonstrated. To accredit laboratories for licensing is a complex activity that should consider many aspects, results from the national quality assessment scheme bring one. A scoring system is being used in Spain for guidance, and the complete guidelines are under preparation.

A database with reliable information to derive definitive analytical quality specifications for a large number of clinical laboratory tests was prepared in this work. This was achieved by comparing and correlating descriptive data and relevant observations with the biological variation information, an approach that had not been used in the previous efforts of this type. The material compiled in the database was obtained from published articles referenced in BIOS, CURRENT CONTENTS, EMBASE and MEDLINE using "biological variationlaboratory medicine" as key words, as well as books and doctoral theses provided by their authors. The database covers 316 quantities and reviews 191 articles, fewer than 10 of which had to be rejected. The within- and between-subject coefficients of variation and the subsequent desirable quality specifications for precision, bias and total error for all the quantities accepted are presented. Sex-related stratification of results was justified for only four quantities and, in these cases, quality specifications were derived from the group with lower within-subject variation. For certain quantities, biological variation in pathological states was higher than in the healthy state. In these cases, quality specifications were derived only from the healthy population (most stringent). Several quantities (particularly hormones) have been treated in very few articles and the results found are highly discrepant. Therefore, professionals in laboratory medicine should be strongly encouraged to study the quantities for which results are discrepant, the 90 quantities described in only one paper and the numerous quantities that have not been the subject of study.

The commutability of calibrators and accuracy control materials affects the traceable link between patient sample results and standards. We sought to identify the repercussions of commutability on various aspects of laboratory practice (calibration, control of bias and accuracy assessment) and to discover the solutions that can reduce the problems produced by non-commutability with presently available resources. Ten serum constituents, ten comparison procedures and 37 analytical procedures were studied. The information concerning accuracy and bias provided from materials found to be commutable in previous works was challenged with native serum results for each routine and reference method compared, using Passing-Bablok regression and decision limits derived from biological variation. We found that: (1) Use of commutable control materials did not assure reliable information on the bias (systematic component of analytical error) of analytical procedures, and (2) Results from native serum and commutable controls were very highly concordant, indicating that these materials provide a good indication of the inaccuracy (total analytical error) of results. We suggest that the performance of individual laboratories would be better evaluated by occasional use of native sera with values assigned by reference methods in EQAS schemes. Moreover, our findings support the idea that manufacturers should assign values to calibrators using reference methods and native sera to reduce matrix effects and promote traceability.