Search

Background Preclinical data suggest some cannabinoids may exert antitumour effects against glioblastoma (GBM). Safety and preliminary efficacy of nabiximols oromucosal cannabinoid spray plus dose-intense temozolomide (DIT) was evaluated in patients with first recurrence of GBM. Methods Part 1 was open-label and Part 2 was randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Both required individualised dose escalation. Patients received nabiximols (Part 1, n = 6; Part 2, n = 12) or placebo (Part 2 only, n = 9); maximum of 12 sprays/day with DIT for up to 12 months. Safety, efficacy, and temozolomide (TMZ) pharmacokinetics (PK) were monitored. Results The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; both parts) were vomiting, dizziness, fatigue, nausea and headache. Most patients experienced TEAEs that were grade 2 or 3 (CTCAE). In Part 2, 33% of both nabiximols- and placebo-treated patients were progression-free at 6 months. Survival at 1 year was 83% for nabiximols- and 44% for placebo-treated patients (p = 0.042), although two patients died within the first 40 days of enrolment in the placebo arm. There were no apparent effects of nabiximols on TMZ PK. Conclusions With personalised dosing, nabiximols had acceptable safety and tolerability with no drug–drug interaction identified. The observed survival differences support further exploration in an adequately powered randomised controlled trial. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: Part 1– NCT01812603; Part 2– NCT01812616.

RESILIENT (NCT03088813) is a phase 2/3 study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan monotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression on/after first-line platinum-based therapy. Here, we present results from RESILIENT part 1. This open-label, single-arm, safety run-in evaluation with dose-exploration and dose-expansion phases included patients ≥18 years old with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1; those with asymptomatic central nervous system metastases were eligible. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and recommend a dose for further development. Efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). During dose exploration, 5 patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 85 mg/m2 (deemed not tolerable; dose-limiting toxicity) and 12 patients received 70 mg/m2 (deemed tolerable). During dose expansion, 13 additional patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 70 mg/m2 . Of these 25 patients (median age [range], 59.0 [48.0-73.0] years, 92.0% with metastatic disease), 10 experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea (20.0%) and neutropenia (16.0%), and 3 had serious treatment-related TEAEs, of whom 2 died. ORR was 44.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.40-65.07; 1 complete response, 10 partial responses) and median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 3.98 (1.45-4.24) months and 8.08 (5.16-9.82) months, respectively. Overall, no new safety signals were identified with liposomal irinotecan, and antitumor activity was promising. RESILIENT part 2, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan versus topotecan, is ongoing. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with few treatment options after platinum-based therapy. Administering 1 option, irinotecan, as a "liposomal" formulation, may extend drug exposure and improve outcomes. The RESILIENT part 1 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan in 25 adults with SCLC after disease progression despite platinum-based therapy. No new safety concerns were reported. The most common moderate-to-severe side effects were diarrhea (20% of patients) and neutropenia (16%). Tumors responded to treatment in 44% of patients. Average survival was 8.08 months, and time to disease progression was 3.98 months. Liposomal irinotecan trials are ongoing.

Background and Aims Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) diagnostic lays on the kidney biopsy given the absence of non-invasive biomarkers for disease demonstration and follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ten urinary inflammatory-related cytokines in the diagnostic of ATIN and its clinical distinction from acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Method Observational prospective study including 21 ATIN and 12 ATN patients, and 6 healthy controls. We determined the urinary levels of 10 inflammation-related cytokines using a multiplex bead-based Luminex assay. We registered clinical, analytical and histological data from the medical records. Results Urinary levels of I-TAC/CXCL11, CXCL10, IL-6, TNFα and MCP-1 were higher in ATIN compared to healthy controls. In contrast, healthy controls exhibited higher EGF urinary levels compared to ATIN patients. Follow-up samples available from 11/21 ATIN patients showed a significant decrease in I-TAC/CXCL11, MIG/CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels. Urinary levels of I-TAC/CXCL11, IL-6 and MCP-1 were significantly higher in ATIN compared to ATN patients, with I-TAC/CXCL11 as the best discriminatory biomarker based on its higher AUC in the ROC curve and likelihood ratio. The combinatory model of the three cytokines increased the sensitivity of the individual biomarkers in the distinction of ATIN/ATN but the best results were obtained when blood eosinophil count and leukocyturia were added to the model. We found a positive correlation of the extent of the tubulointerstitial infiltrate in kidney biopsies with the urinary concentration of I-TAC/CXCL11, MIG/CXCL9, CXCL10, IL17, IFNα, MCP1 and EGF, indicating the potential renal source of the cytokines Conclusion the higher cytokine levels in ATIN compared to ATN patients and healthy controls, the significant decline after treatment and the positive correlation of the cytokines with the grade of the inflammatory infiltrate allows us to propose I-TAC/CXCL11, CXCL10, IL6 and MCP-1 as candidate biomarkers in this disease.

2581 Background: The overall survival (OS) benefit observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors led to their approval in many tumor types. Given the large number of IT compounds in early clinical development, many pts are offered IT within Ph1-CT even before having exhausted standard of care (SOC) therapies. We assessed outcomes of pts receiving novel IT treatments within Ph1-CT at the Phase 1 Unit of Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a correlative series of pts with advanced/metastatic solid tumors treated with IT within Ph1-CT at ICO from January 2018 to June 2021. Primary endpoint was to assess clinical outcomes measured by median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) according to number of prior lines (PL) for recurrent/metastatic disease, grade 3-4 toxicity (G3-4 Tox) and age. Data on prior IT (yes vs no) and availability of alternative SOC were evaluated. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as complete/partial response + stable disease for ≥6 months (m). PFS/OS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used for comparisons. Median PFS of alternative SOC according to historical data was recorded by tumor type and line of treatment. Results: A total of 104 pts received IT within Ph1-CT: IT monotherapy = 39 (37.5%), IT combinations = 65 (62.5%) (IT+IT = 59 [90.8%], IT+targeted therapy = 6 [9.2%]). Median age was 54 y (42-77), 62.5% were men and all had ECOG 0-1. Four most frequent cancers were urothelial (19.2%), colorectal (15.3%), head & neck (12.5%) and glioblastoma (11.5%). Number of PL: 0 = 20 (19.2%) pts, 1 = 37 (35.6%) pts, ≥2 = 47 (45.2%) pts. Nine (8.6%) pts had received prior IT. G3-4 Tox rate for the overall population was 19.2% and for pts who had received prior IT was 33%. ORR was 11.5%; CBR was 24%. Overall mPFS and mOS were 2.7m and 8.6m, respectively. Pts with less PL had greater mPFS and mOS (p < 0.05) (Table). Pts with available alternative SOC had lower mPFS but similar mOS compared to historical SOC (2.6m vs 4.8m, 11.4m vs 11.8m, respectively). G3-4 Tox (yes vs no) and age ( < 70 vs ≥70) did not significantly impact on mOS or mPFS (p = 0.18 and p = 0.83, respectively). At end of Ph1-CT treatment, 47 (45.2%) pts worsened their ECOG status, 15 (14.4%) pts were enrolled in a subsequent trial and 22 (21.1%) pts received SOC. Conclusions: In our cohort of pts treated with novel IT within Ph1-CT, overall clinical outcomes were modest in terms of mPFS, mOS, and CBR. However, pts with less pre-treated tumors seem to achieve higher survival benefit from early treatment with IT within Ph1-CT, although this benefit remains unclear in pts with alternative SOC. [Table: see text]

e14549 Background: Immuno-Oncology (IO) has revolutionized anticancer therapeutics and changed the early drug development paradigm. Positive results and limited access to IO drugs in some countries have led to increased enrollment in IO Ph1-CT at an earlier timepoint in patients (pts) disease journey. We evaluated the impact of IO era on enrollment patterns in Ph1-CT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pts with recurrent/metastatic solid tumors enrolled in Ph1-CT from January 2018 to June 2021 at the Phase 1 Unit of Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain. The primary goal was to assess Ph1-CT enrollment patterns, including use of molecular pre-screening/personalized drug matching, and the availability of alternative standard of care (SOC). Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as complete/partial response+stable disease for ≥6 months. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier method were provided. Results: A total of 175 pts were enrolled in Ph1-CT. Median age was 54 years (range 43-75), Male:Female = 99:76, 99% had ECOG 0-1. The most prevalent tumors were: 32 (18%) breast, 31 (18%) colorectal, 25 (14%) urogenital and 23 (13%) glioblastoma multiforme. One hundred forty-six (83%) pts were enrolled in Ph1-CT with IO (alone or in combination) and 29 (17%) pts with targeted therapy (TT). Molecular pre-screening tests were required in 24 (14%) pts (22 pts IO vs 2 pts TT trial). Eleven (42%) pts were pre-screening failures. Screening failure (SF) rate was 19%, the main reason being clinical worsening for 7 (4%) pts. Thirty-three (19%) pts had an alternative SOC treatment available at time of enrollment. One hundred two (58%) pts had received ≤1 prior lines and 26 (89%) were IO-naïve. Finally, 129 (74%) out of 175 pts enrolled were treated within Ph1-CT. Out of 129 treated pts, ORR was achieved in 18 (14%) pts (3% complete response) and 44 (34%) had stable disease. CBR was observed in 36 (28%) pts. mPFS was 2.8 months and mOS was 10.9 months. Toxicity grade 3-4 occurred in 25 (19%) of pts and 6 (5%) pts had to interrupt treatment. Seventy-one (55%) pts received subsequent therapies: 22 (17%) in Ph1-CT; 49 (38%) SOC. Eleven (9%) pts received IO as subsequent therapy. Decline in ECOG status (baseline vs end of treatment) occurred in 65 (50%) pts. Conclusions: In our cohort of Ph1CT pts, there has been an increasing number of pts enrolled in IO trials compared to TT. Most pts received treatment within Ph1-CT at an earlier timepoint in the course of their disease (1st or 2nd lines). Our results suggest a clear impact of the IO era on the trends of Ph1-CT availability and enrollment patterns.

Background Xentuzumab, an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1/IGF-2-neutralising antibody, binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting their growth-promoting signalling. Two first-in-human trials assessed the maximum-tolerated/relevant biological dose (MTD/RBD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and activity of xentuzumab in advanced/metastatic solid cancers. Methods These phase 1, open-label trials comprised dose-finding (part I; 3 + 3 design) and expansion cohorts (part II; selected tumours; RBD [weekly dosing]). Primary endpoints were MTD/RBD. Results Study 1280.1 involved 61 patients (part I: xentuzumab 10–1800 mg weekly, n = 48; part II: 1000 mg weekly, n = 13); study 1280.2, 64 patients (part I: 10–3600 mg three-weekly, n = 33; part II: 1000 mg weekly, n = 31). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred; the MTD was not reached for either schedule. Adverse events were generally grade 1/2, mostly gastrointestinal. Xentuzumab showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Total plasma IGF-1 increased dose dependently, plateauing at ~1000 mg/week; at ≥450 mg/week, IGF bioactivity was almost undetectable. Two partial responses occurred (poorly differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour). Integration of biomarker and response data by Bayesian Logistic Regression Modeling (BLRM) confirmed the RBD. Conclusions Xentuzumab was well tolerated; MTD was not reached. RBD was 1000 mg weekly, confirmed by BLRM. Xentuzumab showed preliminary anti-tumour activity. Clinical trial registration NCT01403974; NCT01317420.

Intratumoral therapies, especially Toll-like receptor agonists, can trigger both the innate and adaptive immune systems. BO-112 is a nanoplexed form of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) that induces local and systemic immunotherapeutic effects in mouse models. In a multicenter phase 1 clinical trial, repeated intratumoral administrations of BO-112 induced an increase in tumor cell necrosis and apoptosis, as well as augmented immune reactivity according to gene expression profiling. The first three cohorts receiving BO-112 as a monotherapy resulted in a recommended dose of 1 mg that could be safely repeated. Two grade 3 to 4 adverse reactions in the form of reversible thrombocytopenia were reported. In a fourth cohort of 28 patients with tumors that had primary resistance to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), the combination of intratumoral BO-112 with nivolumab or pembrolizumab was also well tolerated, and 3 patients (2 with melanoma and 1 with renal cell carcinoma) achieved partial responses, with 10 more patients having stable disease at 8 to 12 weeks. Thus, local BO-112 combined with a systemic anti-PD-1 agent might be a strategy to revert anti-PD-1 resistance.

Adequate drug distribution through tumors is essential for treatment to be effective. Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved for use in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative metastatic breast cancer. It has unusual physicochemical properties, which may significantly influence its distribution in tumor tissue. We studied the penetration and distribution of palbociclib in vitro, including the use of multicellular three-dimensional models and mathematical modeling. MCF-7 and DLD-1 cell lines were grown as single cell suspensions (SCS) and spheroids; palbociclib uptake and efflux were studied using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Intracellular concentrations of palbociclib for MCF-7 SCS (Cmax 3.22 µM) and spheroids (Cmax 2.91 µM) were 32- and 29-fold higher and in DLD-1, 13- and 7-fold higher, respectively, than the media concentration (0.1 μM). Total palbociclib uptake was lower in DLD-1 cells than MCF-7 cells in both SCS and spheroids. Both uptake and efflux of palbociclib were slower in spheroids than SCS. These data were used to develop a mathematical model of palbociclib transport that quantifies key parameters determining drug penetration and distribution. The model reproduced qualitatively most features of the experimental data and distinguished between SCS and spheroids, providing additional support for hypotheses derived from the experimental data. Mathematical modeling has the potential for translating in vitro data into clinically relevant estimates of tumor drug concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study explores palbociclib uptake and efflux in single cell suspension and spheroid models of cancer. Large intracellular concentrations of palbociclib are found after drug exposure. The data from this study may aid understanding of the intratumoural pharmacokinetics of palbociclib, which is useful in understanding how drug distributes within tumor tissue and optimizing drug efficacy. Biomathematical modelling has the potential to derive intratumoural drug concentrations from plasma pharmacokinetics in patients.

3005 Background: SHP2 transduces signals from activated receptor tyrosine kinases to downstream pathways including MAPK. TNO155 is a selective, allosteric, oral inhibitor of SHP2. Methods: CTNO155X2101 (NCT03114319) is an ongoing first-in-human, open-label dose escalation/expansion trial of TNO155 in adults with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to characterize the safety and tolerability of TNO155 and identify regimen(s) for future study. Secondary assessments included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical efficacy. Here we present data from TNO155 single agent escalation. Results: As of 10/26/2020, 118 patients received TNO155 in variable schedules: once (QD; 1.5–70 mg; n = 55) or twice daily (BID; 30–50 mg; n = 25) in a 2 weeks on/1 week off (2w/1w) cycle; or QD in a 3w/1w cycle (30–60 mg; n = 32), or continuously (40 or 50 mg QD; n = 6). The most common cancer diagnoses treated were colorectal (54%), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (16%), non-small cell lung (12%), and head & neck (8%). The median number of prior antineoplastic therapies was 4 (range 1–10). Overall 109 patients (92%) have discontinued study treatment, 94 (80%) for progressive disease and 6 (5%) for adverse events (AEs). TNO155 showed rapid absorption (median day 1 Tmax ̃1.1 hours), an effective median T½ of ̃34 hours, and near dose-proportional exposure at day 14 (power model: AUCτ beta = 1.09 [90% CI 1.02–1.16]). AEs were mostly Grade 1/2 and generally consistent with on-target effects of SHP2 inhibition. The most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (n = 33, 28%), peripheral edema (n = 31, 26%), diarrhea (n = 31, 26%), and acneiform dermatitis (n = 27, 23%). The most common treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs were decreased platelets (n = 5, 4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase, diarrhea, and decreased neutrophils (each n = 4, 3%). The best observed response was stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1, reported in 24 (20%) patients, with a median duration of SD of 4.9 months (range 1.7–29.3). Evidence of SHP2 inhibition, as measured by change in DUSP6 expression by qPCR in paired pre- vs. on-treatment tumor samples, was seen in the majority of patients treated with TNO155 doses ≥20 mg/day (≥25% reduction, 38/42 [90%]; ≥50% reduction, 25/42 [60%]). Analysis of tumor whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing data is ongoing. Conclusions: TNO155 shows favorable pharmacokinetic properties and promising early safety and tolerability data at doses with evidence of target inhibition. The optimal dose using several schedules is still under evaluation. Studies of TNO155 in combination with other agents, including nazartinib (mutant-selective EGFR inhibitor[i]), adagrasib (KRAS G12Ci), spartalizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), ribociclib (CDK4/6i), and dabrafenib (BRAFi) with LTT462 (ERKi), are ongoing (NCT03114319, NCT04330664, NCT04000529, NCT04294160). Clinical trial information: NCT03114319.

9069 Background: Most patients with extensive SCLC develop drug resistance to platinum-based 1L therapy or discontinue for other reasons, and second-line (2L) therapies are limited. RESILIENT (NCT03088813) is a two-part phase 2/3 study assessing the safety, tolerability and efficacy of 2L liposomal irinotecan monotherapy in adults with SCLC who progressed with platinum-based 1L therapy. Preliminary data from RESILIENT part 1 (cut-off May 8 2019; ≥ 12 weeks follow-up) showed that liposomal irinotecan 70 mg/m2 free base every 2 weeks was generally well tolerated and had encouraging antitumor activity (Paz-Ares et al. WCLC 2019 OA03.03). Objective response rate (ORR; secondary endpoint) was 44% (11/25). Here we report efficacy analyses in post hoc subgroups by platinum sensitivity. Methods: RESILIENT part 1 was an open-label, single-arm study comprising dose-finding and dose-expansion phases. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 y, with an ECOG performance status score of 0/1 and adequate organ function; a single line of prior immunotherapy was allowed. Participants received liposomal irinotecan 70 mg/m2 or 85 mg/m2 free base every 2 weeks, with tumor assessments every 6 weeks (RECIST v1.1). Analyses were undertaken for the dose-finding phase recommended dose (RD) in subgroups of platinum-resistant/sensitive patients (with/without progression within 90 days from completion of 1L therapy). Results: During dose finding, 5 patients received liposomal irinotecan 85 mg/m2 (deemed not tolerable; dose-limiting toxicity) and 12 received 70 mg/m2 (deemed tolerable; RD for dose-expansion phase in which 13 more patients were included). Analyses included all 25 patients receiving the RD (mean exposure, 13.95 weeks [median 14.86; SD 7.222]). In the platinum-sensitive subgroup (33.3% men; median age 62.0 y) ORR was 53.3% (8/15) and 12-week disease control rate (DCR12wks) was 60% (9/15); in the platinum-resistant subgroup (50% men, median age 58.0 y) both ORR and DCR12wks were 30% (3/10). Overall and progression-free survival (secondary endpoints) are not yet mature. Conclusions: ORR and DCR12wks were numerically higher in platinum-sensitive than in platinum-resistant patients with SCLC who had progressed with platinum-based 1L therapy before receiving 2L liposomal irinotecan 70 mg/m2 in this phase 2 study. RESILIENT part 2, an ongoing, phase 3, randomized controlled trial vs topotecan, will provide further data. Clinical trial information: NCT03088813.

TPS9081 Background: Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is often sensitive to established first-line therapies, many patients relapse and develop drug resistance, and second-line therapies are limited. RESILIENT (NCT03088813) is a two-part phase 2/3 study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan monotherapy in patients with SCLC who progressed with platinum-based first-line therapy. Preliminary data from the dose-ranging part of the study (part 1) showed that liposomal irinotecan 70 mg/m2 administered every 2 weeks was well tolerated and had promising antitumor activity (Paz-Ares et al. ASCO 2019; poster 318). Here, we present the design of the second, larger part of the study, which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan versus topotecan in the same patient population. Methods: Part 2 of RESILIENT is a phase 3, open-label study with a planned sample size of 450. Patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to intravenous liposomal irinotecan or intravenous topotecan. Liposomal irinotecan is administered every 2 weeks at 70 mg/m2 (free-base equivalent) and topotecan is administered for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks at 1.5 mg/m2. As of January 2020, 80 patients have been enrolled in part 2 of the trial. Tumor assessments are performed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and the Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology criteria for CNS lesions; symptom improvement is measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Safety assessments include monitoring for adverse events. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and proportion of patients reporting symptom improvement. Patients will continue study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study withdrawal and will then be followed for survival until death or study end (when all patients have died, withdrawn consent or are lost to follow-up). Clinical trial information: NCT03088813.

Failure of systemic cancer treatment can be, at least in part, due to the drug not being delivered to the tumour at sufficiently high concentration and/or sufficiently homogeneous distribution; this is termed as “pharmacokinetic drug resistance”. To understand whether a drug is being adequately delivered to the tumour, “precision pharmacology” techniques are needed. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a relatively new and complex technique that allows imaging of drug distribution within tissues. In this review we address the applicability of MSI to the study of cancer drug distribution from the bench to the bedside. We address: (i) the role of MSI in pre-clinical studies to characterize anti-cancer drug distribution within the body and the tumour, (ii) the application of MSI in pre-clinical studies to define optimal drug dose or schedule, combinations or new drug delivery systems, and finally (iii) the emerging role of MSI in clinical research.

Background BO-112 is a dsRNA (poly I:C) formulated with polyethylenimine, that upon Intratumoral (IT) injection acts by activating TLR3, RIG-1 and MDA-5. This induces immunogenic cell death and potentiate systemic therapy with checkpoint inhibitors in animal models. In patients (pts), single-agent BO-112 IT increases necrosis, apoptosis and expression of pro-immune genes in solid cancers, with a manageable safety. 1 mg was the dose combined with anti-PD-1 in the current clinical trial (NCT02828098). Methods BO-112 was combined with anti PD-1 in 28 pts with solid tumors primarily resistant to anti PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). A lesion >1 cm amenable to IT injection was required. 28 pts were treated with 1 mg IT BO-112 qw x 2 or 3 doses before continuing the previous anti PD-1 combined with BO-112, until progression, limiting toxicity or up to 1y. Pre & post BO-112 biopsies from injected lesion were analysed. Response was first assessed by RECIST 1.1 at week 8-12. Results BO-112 related AEs and biological effects at interim analysis are summarized in the table. The combination was well tolerated. No deaths were associated with BO-112. Of 18 evaluable pts for response, at first assessment: 2 have achieved an objective partial response (PR) (1 melanoma and 1 renal carcinoma), with 1 of them continuing treatment; 11 patients had stable disease (SD); 5 patients progressed (PD). Additionally 6 patients progressed prior to the first evaluation, 3 died before efficacy assessments and 1 received palliative radiotherapy and was considered not evaluable. Table . 100P All G3-5 TEAEs (%) G3-4 BO-112 related TEAEs (%) Necrosis (D > 5%) (%)* CD8+ T cell infiltrate (D > 5%) (%)* *evaluable All N = 28 18 (64) 1 (4) 10 (50) 7 (35) Melanoma N = 10 7 (70) 0 5 (56) 4 (44) Non-Small lung cancer N = 13 8 (62) 1 (8) 3 (38) 1 (13) Other N = 5 3 (60) 0 2 (67) 2 (67) Conclusion BO-112 combined with anti PD-1 shows a manageable safety profile, direct antitumor effects and innate and adaptive immune system activation. Efficacy analyses suggest potential to reverse primary resistance to anti-PD1 treatment. Studies in other indications, including combination with radiotherapy, are planned. Clinical trial identification NCT02828098. Legal entity responsible for the study Bioncotech Therapeutics. Funding Bioncotech Therapeutics. Disclosure I. Marquez-Rodas: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bioncotech; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Biosequence; Research grant / Funding (institution): Idera. P. Lopez-Casas: Full / Part-time employment: Bioncotech. M. Martin: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Puma; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Tahio; Advisory / Consultancy: Pharmamar; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Daiichi. D. Tersago: Full / Part-time employment: Bioncotech. M. Quintero: Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Bioncotech. I. Melero: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Alligator; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Tusk; Advisory / Consultancy: Numab; Advisory / Consultancy: Molecular Partners; Advisory / Consultancy: F Star; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

The tumour vasculature and microenvironment is complex and heterogeneous, contributing to reduced delivery of cancer drugs to the tumour. We have developed an in silico model of drug transport in a tumour cord to explore the effect of different drug regimes over a 72 h period and how changes in pharmacokinetic parameters affect tumour exposure to the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin. We used the model to describe the radial and axial distribution of drug in the tumour cord as a function of changes in the transport rate across the cell membrane, blood vessel and intercellular permeability, flow rate, and the binding and unbinding ratio of drug within the cancer cells. We explored how changes in these parameters may affect cellular exposure to drug. The model demonstrates the extent to which distance from the supplying vessel influences drug levels and the effect of dosing schedule in relation to saturation of drug-binding sites. It also shows the likely impact on drug distribution of the aberrant vasculature seen within tumours. The model can be adapted for other drugs and extended to include other parameters. The analysis confirms that computational models can play a role in understanding novel cancer therapies to optimize drug administration and delivery.

8562 Background: Nal-IRI is investigated as monotherapy in patients with SCLC who progressed on or after platinum regimen. The RESILIENT study is a Part 1 study of a Phase 2/3 trial to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Irinotecan Liposome Injection in patients with SCLC. Methods: Nal-IRI is evaluated in patients ≥18 yrs with advanced SCLC with an ECOG performance status ≤1 and adequate organ function; prior exposure to immunotherapy is allowed. Safety and tolerability at dose levels of 85 mg/m2 and 70 mg/m2 are the primary endpoints, with assessment of exploratory efficacy signal. Results: At 24 Dec 2018 safety cutoff 12 patients in Part 1 received ≥1 dose of nal-IRI (Cohort 1 [C-1] at 85 mg/m2 dose n=4; Cohort 2 [C-2] at 70 mg/m2 dose n=8; median age 60.0 yrs; range 49–73 yrs). Three patients experienced ≥1 DLT (Cohort 1 n=3/4; Cohort 2 n=0/8). Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (any grade): diarrhea (91.7%), nausea (58.3%), vomiting (41.7%), decreased appetite (58%), abdominal pain (33%) manageable by antidiarrheal regimen and antiemetics; as well as fatigue (50%) and asthenia (37.5%). Overall, hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (any grade) at 16.7% and anemia (any grade) at 16.7%. At 11 Dec 2018 efficacy cutoff the best objective response was partial response (PR) at 33.3% in 4/12 patients (C-1 n=1/4; C-2 n=3/8), median time to response was 6 wks. Overall disease control rate (DCR) was 58.3%; progressive disease (PD) was observed in 2 patients (16.7%), and 3 patients were non-evaluable (25%). Conclusions: Initial assessment suggests that nal-IRI at 70 mg/m2 dose given bi-weekly is well-tolerated and has promising antitumor activity in patients with SCLC who progressed on or after platinum regimen. Part 1 dose expansion is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCTN03088813. [Table: see text]

8509 Background: Patients with stage IIIA (N2 or T4N0) are potentially curable but median overall survival is only around 15 months and complete pathologic response with conventional chemotherapy (CT) is no more than 9%. Methods: A Phase II, single-arm, open-label multicenter study of resectable stage IIIA N2-NSCLC adult patients with CT plus IO as a neoadjuvant treatment: three cycles of Nivolumab (NV) 360mg IV Q3W + paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 6 IV Q3W followed by adjuvant NV treatment for 1 year. After complete neoadjuvant therapy, tumor assessment is performed prior to surgery. Surgery is performed in the 3rd or 4th week after day 21 of the third cycle of neoadjuvant treatment. The study aims to recruit 46 pts. The primary endpoint is Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 24 months. Efficacy is explored using objective pathologic response criteria. We present final data on all patients included in this study that underwent surgical assessment. Results: At the time of submission, 46 pts had been included and 41 had undergone surgery. CT-IO was well-tolerated and surgery was not delayed in any patient. None of the pts withdrew from the study preoperatively due to progression or toxicity. 41 surgeries had been performed and all tumors were deemed resectable, with R0 resection in all cases. 34 pts (83%) achieved major pathologic response (MPR) (CI 95% 71-95%), and 24 (71%) of them had a complete pathologic response (CPR) (CI 95% 54-87%). Downstaging was seen in 90% (CI 95% 81-100%) of cases. By RECIST, 29 pts (71%) (CI 95% 56-85%) had partial response and 3 (7%) (CI 95% 0-16%) complete response. Conclusions: This is the first multicentric study to CT-IO in the neoadjuvant setting in stage IIIA. Neoadjuvant CT-IO with nivolumab in resectable IIIA NSCLC yields a high complete pathologic response rate that has never been seen previously and unsuspected by RECIST criteria. Preliminary correlative analyses in blood samples are included in a separate abstract. EudraCT Number: 2016-003732-20. Clinical trial information: NCT 03081689.

TPS9122 Background: Lung cancer (LC) is a rare disease among young adults. Polymorphisms in genes involved in carcinogenic metabolism of tobacco and/or xenobiotic metabolism have been identified in those patients. The growing use of next generation sequencing (NGS) unravelled germline mutations in genes associated with hereditary cancer in patients with LC. However, germline DNA mutations have not been systematically studied in young adults with LC. Early onset LC patients are likely to harbor actionable somatic mutations. Broad hybrid NGS can identify actionable genomic alterations in LC patients deemed driver negative by routine molecular analysis. Trial Design: This is a multicentre, prospective, single-cohort study to determine whether young patients with LC harbor germline mutations and to evaluate the impact of NGS using Foundation One platform on the therapeutic options and overall survival for this specific patient population. Major inclusion criteria: 1) patients already or newly diagnosed of non-small cell lung cancer at any stage at age < 51; 2) to have sufficient tumor sample to perform standard molecular diagnosis ( EGFR/ALK/ROS1/BRAF); 3) to provide written informed consent for the study. Methods: After signing the informed consent form, family history of cancer and smoking history will be collected and a peripheral blood sample will be obtained. Germline targeted sequencing will be carried out in our centre using a customized hereditary cancer panel (I2HCP) of 136 genes designed to cover the coding exons and intron-exon boundaries of genes associated with moderate or high risk of hereditary cancer. Patients with clinical criteria for hereditary cancer or harboring pathogenic or probably pathogenic germline alteration will be referred to the genetic counselling unit. Patients will follow the usual clinical pathway for biomarker analysis and in case of remaining tumour material it will be used for conducting comprehensive genomic profiling through Foundation One platform. When tumour material available will not be sufficient to perform NGS, a tumour re-biopsy will be considered. Enrolment begun on June 2018 and, to date, a total of 41 patients have been included in the study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with breast cancer with inoperable disease or smaller tumours who might benefit from a conservative surgery after downstaging of their disease. Nevertheless, evidence shows that preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy are equivalent in terms of long-term survival. Response and histological changes after NAC have been widely studied in invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified, but there is a paucity of characterisation of patterns of response to chemotherapy in less frequent histological types. We report extensive residual mucin deposits after chemotherapy in a woman with locally advanced breast cancer and a prominent mucinous component at diagnosis. Interestingly, residual mucin was co-located with the initial tumour, in the breast as well as in the axillary lymph nodes. The distribution of mucin may be a valuable marker of the extent of mucinous carcinomas prior to NAC.

Background: Eri & Cap are active as single agents in metastatic breast cancer, but the combination appears particularly active & well tolerated clinically. We explored the hypothesis that normalisation of tumor vasculature by Eri seen in preclinical models may enhance delivery of Cap to the tumor when given in combination. Methods: Mice bearing MDA-MD-231 xenografts were treated with Cap 540mg/kg p.o. day 1 alone or following Eri 1mg/kg i.v. on day -8 then sacrificed on day 1 at 15min, 30min, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h or 24h after Cap (n=3/ time point). Concentrations of Cap & its metabolites (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5DFCR; 5-Fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine, 5DFUR; 5-Fluorouracil, 5FU; 5-Fluorouridine, 5FUrd; & 5-Fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, 5FdUrd) in plasma, tumor, skin & muscle were analysed by LC-MS/MS. Half the tumor was reserved to study Cap distribution using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging with haem imaged as a surrogate marker for tumour vasculature. Results: We found no differences in the plasma, skin, muscle or tumor PK profiles of Cape & its metabolites with the addition of Eri (Table 1). In both treatment arms intratumoral concentrations of 5DFUR, 5FU, 5FUrd & 5FdUrd appeared higher in tumors while those of Cape & 5DFCR appeared higher in normal healthy tissues. To mitigate the variability in tumor Cape concentrations between animals, we also expressed the results as the ratio of drug concentration in tumour:healthy tissue but again found no apparent effect of Eri on intratumoral drug concentrations. Analyses of drug distribution are on-going & will be presented. Conclusion: No clear effect of Eri on intratumoral concentrations of Cape or its metabolites was seen. We are exploring potential differences in tumour drug distribution. Citation Format: Maria Jove Casulleras, Jade Spencer, Paul Loadman, Malcolm Clench, Steve Shnyder, Patricia Cooper, Cristina Russo, Amanda Race, Ramon Salazar, Chris Twelves. Preclinical intratumoral pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine (Cap) given +/- eribulin (Eri) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4926.

8521Background: The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy (CT-IO) has a high response rate and longer survival in unselected patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC...

Tamoxifen (TAM) remains the adjuvant therapy of choice for pre-menopausal women with ERα-positive breast cancer. Resistance and recurrence remain, however, a major challenge with many women relapsing and subsequently dying. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis is involved in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression to endocrine resistant disease, but there is very little data on the expression and potential role of IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP) during acquisition of the resistant phenotype. The aim of this study was to determine the expression and functional role of IGFBP-2 and -5 in the development of TAM resistance (TamR) in vitro and to test retrospectively whether they were predictive of resistance in a tissue microarray of 77 women with primary breast cancers who relapsed on/after endocrine therapy and 193 who did not with long term follow up. Reciprocal expression of IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5 was observed at both mRNA and protein level in TamR cells. IGFBP-2 expression was increased by 10-fold while IGFBP-5 was decreased by 100-fold, compared to TAM-sensitive control cells. shRNA-mediated silencing of IGFBP-2 in TamR cells restored TAM sensitivity suggesting a causal role for this gene in TamR. While silencing of IGFBP-5 in control cells had no effect on TAM sensitivity, it significantly increased the migratory capacity of these cells. Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemical data failed, however, to demonstrate an effect of IGFBP2 expression in endocrine-relapsed patients. Likewise, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5 expression failed to show any significant associations with survival either in patients relapsing or those not relapsing on/after endocrine therapy. By contrast, in silico mining of a separate published dataset showed that in patients who received endocrine treatment, loss of expression of IGBP-5 was significantly associated with worse survival. Overall these data suggest that co-ordinated and reciprocal alteration in IGFBP-2 and -5 expression may play a role in the acquisition of endocrine resistance.

Introduction: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints often only weakly correlate. This analysis investigates how different progression events impact on OS, using data from two phase 3 studies with eribulin in women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In Study 301, 1102 women with ≤2 prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC were randomized to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days). Study 305/EMBRACE enrolled 762 patients following two to five prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC, randomized to eribulin (as above) or treatment of physician's choice. We analyzed OS and PFS post hoc for patients whose disease progressed due to development of "new" metastases, growth of pre-existing lesions, and patients with no reported disease progression. Results: In both clinical studies, development of new metastases was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.0001). The time to development of new metastasis or death was significantly longer with eribulin than the comparator in Study 305 (p = 0.0017), but not in Study 301 (p = 0.46). Significantly longer OS was observed in the eribulin compared with the comparator arm for the new metastases subgroup in Study 301 (p = 0.008), but not in Study 305 (p = 0.16), compared with other progression subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with MBC progressing with new metastases have a worse prognosis than those whose disease progresses due to growth of existing lesions or patients with no reported disease progression. These findings have potentially important implications for the interpretation of clinical study data and clinical practice., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Introduction: Pre-clinical drug development does not routinely assess drug penetration beyond use of the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line as an in vitro model of the intestinal barrier to evaluate potential drug absorption. Detailed in vivo tumour pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are unusual. However, the ability of a drug to reach its target plays a key role in drug efficacy. Here we present a methodology to study drug PK in disaggregated cells and in a 3D cell culture model (spheroids) using 5FU and palbociclib. The comparison of these 2 drugs is of interest taking into account their different mechanisms and chemical properties, logP 0.58 and 2.12 respectively. Knowledge of cellular uptake and efflux in disaggregated cells and 3D models together with intracellular binding characteristics is vital to optimise a better drug delivery. Experimental procedures: MCF-7 and DLD-1 cells were used for cellular and spheroid experiments. Spheroid growth was optimized to produce a spheroid of 300-400µm diameter at day 4. Drug uptake: 1x106 cells or 30 spheroids/time point were exposed to 10µM 5FU or 0.1µM of palbociclib for different time durations. For 5FU, drug uptake at 100µM was also monitored to detect 5FU metabolites. Drug efflux: 1x106 cells were exposed first to 100µM 5FU or 0.1µM of palbociclib for 60min then, drug media removed, substituted by fresh media and sample over a 4h period. Drug concentration inside cells and in the fresh media was measured. Drug concentrations were measured using HPLC-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. Results: 5FU achieves intracellular steady state within 5-10min in cells and spheroids with equal concentrations inside and outside the cell/spheroids. Intracellular metabolites of 5FU were only seen with 100µM treatment and had a similar PK characteristics to 5FU. 5FU drug efflux experiments showed that efflux occurred rapidly within 5min achieving a new equilibrium with 30% of 5FU remaining inside the cells. 5FUrd was also detected extracellularly after 1h in the fresh media, showing that cells have both 5FU and metabolite efflux. In contrast, palbociclib cellular uptake had an initial intracellular drug concentration peak at 5-10min which then plateaued. Interestingly, total intracellular concentrations of palbociclib were over 30 times higher compared to the external media drug at steady state. Spheroid and efflux experiments of palbociclib are on-going and will be presented. Conclusions: Our results suggest that both drugs penetrate quickly in cancer cells. Palbociclib intracellular concentrations were 30 times higher than the external media suggesting excessive intracellular binding while 5FU achieve equal concentrations between the inside and outside of the cell. These data and methodology may be useful to allow generation of mathematical models to improve drug delivery design. Citation Format: Maria Jove, Paul Loadman, Jade Spencer, Lava Sulayman, Jo Wicks, Amanda Race, Chris Twelves. Intracellular pharmacokinetics of 5FU and palbociclib: Uptake and efflux in disaggregated cells and 3D models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4205. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4205

e15582 Background: Some patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have an indolent course. Since new target agents are not exempt from toxicity, initial active surveillance (AS) wi...

441 Background: Some patients (pt) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have an indolent course. Treatment toxicities can worsen quality of life. Active surveillance (AS) in paucisymptomatic pts is an option often used but few data is available. Our aim is to analyze the impact of initial AS in a sequential therapy strategy in terms of overall survival (OS). Methods: Data frompt diagnosed with mRCC from January 2005 to December 2013 in 3 centres of Spain were retrospectively analyzed. AS subgroup was defined as pt with ≥6 months (m) between diagnosis and first-line (L) treatment (tto) start. A descriptive analysis and median OS (mOS) were performed comparing pt with or without AS (AS vs. tto 1 year from diagnosis to M1, positively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that AS before starting first L of tto is not a detrimental action in a selected population of mRCC pt with good risk characteristics allowing them to remain free of therapy’s toxicity during a long time period.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains central to the treatment of all subtypes of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We review evidence-based chemotherapy options for women with MBC after an anthracycline and a taxane including re-challenge with anthracycline or taxane, capecitabine, eribulin and ixabepilone as a single agent or combination with capecitabine (not approved in the EU); and the vinca alkaloid vinflunine as single agent or combined with either capecitabine/gemcitabine (also not approved EU or USA). Etirinotecan pegol, comprising irinotecan bound to polyethylene glycol by a biodegradable linker, is a new cytotoxic agent for patients with MBC that has achieved encouraging response rates in phase II studies; it has been further evaluated in the phase III BEACON trial. New cytotoxics should address novel targets or modes of delivery, achieve meaningful improvements in outcomes and seek to identify predictive biomarker(s)., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published