Search

Abstract Introduction The integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis (AD‐ICPs) aim to bridge the gap between existing AD treatment evidence‐based guidelines and expert opinion based on daily practice by offering a structured multidisciplinary plan for patient management of AD. ICPs have the potential to enhance guideline recommendations by combining interventions and aspects from different guidelines, integrating quality assurance, and describing co‐ordination of care. Most importantly, patients can enter the ICPs at any level depending on AD severity, resources available in their country, and economic factors such as differences in insurance reimbursement systems. Methods The GA2LEN ADCARE network and partners as well as all stakeholders, abbreviated as the AD‐ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021, after which the document was circulated within all GAL2EN ADCARE centres. Results The AD‐ICPs outline the diagnostic procedures, possible co‐morbidities, different available treatment options including differential approaches for the pediatric population, and the role of the pharmacists and other stakeholders, as well as remaining unmet needs in the management of AD. Conclusion The AD‐ICPs provide a multidisciplinary plan for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient feedback in AD management, as well as addressing critical unmet needs, including improved access to care, training specialists, implementation of educational programs, assessment on the impact of climate change, and fostering a personalised treatment approach. By focusing on these key areas, the initiative aims to pave the way for a brighter future in the management of AD.

Introducción: El tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) severa es una necesidad insatisfecha, dada la limitada eficacia y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos (TSC). Dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que bloquea la señalización de las interleuquinas mediadoras de la respuesta inflamatoria involucrada en la DA. Métodos: se analizó la respuesta clínica de un grupo de pacientes de Argentina con DA severa y respuesta insuficiente y/o toxicidad a los TSC que fueron tratados con dupilumab antes de su disponibilidad comercial. Se evaluaron las escalas EASI, SCORAD, DLQI y escalas visuales analógicas de prurito y sueño, durante una mediana de 189 días de seguimiento, así como la incidencia de eventos adversos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 20 pacientes (13 varones); mediana de edad: 37,5 años; mediana de evolución de la DA: 20 años; comorbilidad atópica: 70%. El 100% habían recibido corticoides sistémicos (complicaciones graves: 20%). Los principales motivos de suspensión de los TSC fueron falta de eficacia y aparición de eventos adversos. Los puntajes de todas las escalas se redujeron significativa y sostenidamente, con respuesta clínica evidente al segundo mes de tratamiento. Al final del seguimiento, solo 3 pacientes requerían tratamiento inmunosupresor sistémico concomitante. Dupilumab fue bien tolerado, con eventos adversos leves y controlables. Discusión: el dupilumab constituye el único agente biológico con elevada eficacia demostrada en estudios clínicos y observacionales. En esta casuística, se confirmó su efectividad en pacientes con DA severa de difícil tratamiento y respuesta inadecuada a los TSC. El perfil de seguridad resultó favorable y sostenido a mediano plazo.

Abstract Background: Despite the economic burden of psoriasis for patients and societies, scant information exists regarding the impact and burden of the disease in Argentina. Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate medical resource consumption and direct health care costs for patients with moderate/severe psoriasis in Buenos Aires, Argentina from the perspective of the payer. Methods: Adults with moderate/severe psoriasis (severity was defined as receiving systemic treatment), during January 2010-January 2014, aged 18 years and older, members of the Italian Hospital Medical Care Program with at least 18 months of follow-up were included. All data on hospitalizations, drug prescription, outpatient episodes, consultations, and investigations/tests in the 12 months before inclusion in the study were considered for the estimation of medical resource consumption and direct health care costs. First-quarter 2018 costs were obtained from the IHMCP and converted into US dollars (using the January 2018 exchange rate). Results: A total of 791 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 34 ± 12 years. Almost 65% of the patients had a dermatologist as their usual source of care, 43% had internists, and 14% had rheumatologists. The average yearly direct cost was US$ 5326 (95% CI: 4125-7896) per patient per year. Study limitation: The single center design and the retrospective nature are the main limitations. Conclusion: This is the first Argentine study that evaluated the costs of moderate/severe psoriasis by taking into consideration the direct medical costs of the disease.