Search

PURPOSE Epcoritamab is a subcutaneously administered CD3xCD20 T-cell–engaging, bispecific antibody that activates T cells, directing them to kill malignant CD20+ B cells. Single-agent epcoritamab previously demonstrated potent antitumor activity in dose escalation across B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the dose-expansion cohort of a phase I/II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03625037 ), adults with relapsed or refractory CD20+ large B-cell lymphoma and at least two prior therapy lines (including anti-CD20 therapies) received subcutaneous epcoritamab in 28-day cycles (once weekly step-up doses in weeks 1-3 of cycle 1, then full doses once weekly through cycle 3, once every 2 weeks in cycles 4-9, and once every 4 weeks in cycle 10 and thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall response rate by the independent review committee. RESULTS As of January 31, 2022, 157 patients were treated (median age, 64 years [range, 20‐83]; median of three [range, 2-11] prior therapy lines; primary refractory disease: 61.1%; prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell exposure: 38.9%). At a median follow-up of 10.7 months, the overall response rate was 63.1% (95% CI, 55.0 to 70.6) and the complete response rate was 38.9% (95% CI, 31.2 to 46.9). The median duration of response was 12.0 months (among complete responders: not reached). Overall and complete response rates were similar across key prespecified subgroups. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (49.7%; grade 1 or 2: 47.1%; grade 3: 2.5%), pyrexia (23.6%), and fatigue (22.9%). Immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 6.4% of patients with one fatal event. CONCLUSION Subcutaneous epcoritamab resulted in deep and durable responses and manageable safety in highly refractory patients with large B-cell lymphoma, including those with prior CAR T-cell exposure.

En el sector del Cerro Bayo, en la provincia de Santa Cruz, se identificó un conjunto de sitios en aleros y a cielo abierto. Esta zona se ubica en una posición estratégica entre la región cordillerana del norte de la provincia y el sector oeste del Macizo del Deseado. Desde el punto de vista geográfico, puede ser pensada como un espacio de conexión entre ambas regiones. Además, se encuentra en cercanía de dos áreas de gran importancia para la arqueología regional; Pampa del Asador y la cuenca del Río Pinturas. En este estudio se presenta el primer cuerpo de datos generado a partir de los trabajos llevados a cabo en el sitio Cerro Bayo 2. Si bien los resultados son de carácter preliminar, se pudieron hacer algunos acercamientos cronológicos y sobre la historia ocupacional del sitio. A partir del análisis de diferentes líneas de evidencia, se llegaron a conclusiones acerca de las actividades que se desarrollaron en el sitio y su vinculación con áreas cercanas.

Se presentan los resultados del análisis químico de artefactos de obsidiana del sitio Villa JMC-1 Labranza, cuenca media del Río Cautín, valles centrales del centro sur de Chile, datado aproximadamente 1000 años aP (período Alfarero temprano). Se postula que la interpretación sobre la representación de grupos químicos de obsidiana en sitios arqueológicos del área centro sur de Chile se encuentra sesgada por muestreo y limitaciones de las técnicas analíticas. Eso implicó una escasa visibilidad de grupos químicos orientales en el sector centro sur chileno que fue interpretado como evidencia del carácter limitante de la cordillera de los Andes, en disonancia con otras evidencias. La ampliación de la muestra y el uso de técnicas no destructivas sobre el total de la colección del sitio permitieron reconocer que tres de los cinco artefactos de obsidiana provienen de dos grupos químicos del sector oriental cordillerano. Algunos aspectos tecnológicos de las propiedades de las materias primas y sus modificaciones superficiales sugieren la explotación y aprovisionamiento selectivo de variedades cromáticas que posiblemente requirieron el acceso a fuentes primarias. Finalmente, se amplía la distribución espacial del grupo químico CP-LL1 y al mismo tiempo se describe su primer registro para la República de Chile.

Children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) without complete metabolic response (CMR) before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) have poor survival outcomes. CheckMate 744, a phase 2 study for CAYA (aged 5-30 years) with relapsed/refractory cHL, evaluated a risk-stratified, response-adapted approach with nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin (BV) followed by BV plus bendamustine for patients with suboptimal response. Risk stratification was primarily based on time to relapse, prior treatment, and presence of B symptoms. We present the primary analysis of the standard-risk cohort. Data from the low-risk cohort are reported separately. Patients received 4 induction cycles with nivolumab plus BV; those without CMR (Deauville score >3, Lugano 2014) received BV plus bendamustine intensification. Patients with CMR after induction or intensification proceeded to consolidation (high-dose chemotherapy/auto-HCT per protocol). Primary endpoint was CMR any time before consolidation. Forty-four patients were treated. Median age was 16 years. At a minimum follow-up of 15.6 months, 43 patients received 4 induction cycles (1 discontinued); 11 of whom received intensification, 32 proceeded to consolidation. CMR rate was 59% after induction with nivolumab plus BV, and 94% any time before consolidation (nivolumab plus BV ± BV plus bendamustine). One-year PFS rate was 91%. During induction, 18% of patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events. This risk-stratified, response-adapted salvage strategy had high CMR rates with limited toxicities in CAYA with relapsed/refractory cHL. Most patients did not require additional chemotherapy (bendamustine intensification). Additional follow-up is needed to confirm durability of disease control. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02927769.

espanolSe presentan los primeros resultados de los relevamientos realizados en la confluencia de los canadones Caracoles y Pinturas, en el noroeste de la provincia de Santa Cruz. Entre las tareas realizadas se destaca la ubicacion de los sitios identificados por Gradin y colaboradores, un primer registro del arte rupestre en uno de ellos y la realizacion de transectas dirigidas. El analisis preliminar del material litico recuperado mostro la utilizacion de rocas siliceas de muy buena calidad y de obsidiana para la confeccion de raspadores y puntas de proyectil pedunculadas. Uno de los objetivos finales de estos trabajos es identificar la profundidad temporal en el uso de este espacio particular para evaluar el papel que pudo haber tenido en la circulacion humana hacia los sectores cordilleranos. Si bien los sondeos realizados no brindaron evidencias que pudieran datarse, la presencia de fragmentos ceramicos los vincula con ocupaciones que se ubicarian en el Holoceno tardio. EnglishThe initial results of surveys carried out at the confluence of Caracoles and Pinturas canyons, in the northwest of Santa Cruz province, are presented. The tasks carried out included locating the sites identified by Gradin and collaborators, the initial recording of the rock art in one of them, and surveying using directed transects. The preliminary analysis of the recovered lithic material showed the selection of high-quality siliceous rocks and obsidian for making scrapers and stemmed projectile points. One of the ultimate goals of our research is to identify the temporal depth in the use of this particular area to evaluate the role it could have had in the human circulation towards the mountain-range area. Although the surveys did not provide datable evidence, the assemblages recovered are associated with ceramic sherds related to occupations that can be placed during the Late Holocene

INTRODUÇÃO: As ataxias cerebelares são um extenso grupo de doenças, que causam diversos distúrbios na marcha e no equilíbrio que comprometem seriamente a qualidade de vida, sem opções de tratamento eficazes. A cinesioterapia é a base de programas multifacetados que incorporam mais de um enfoque, como o treinamento de coordenação e equilíbrio. Recentemente, a estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua (tDCS) sobre o cerebelo surgiu como uma intervenção para melhorar os distúrbios do equilíbrio. OBJETIVO: Descrever a aplicação simultânea de tDCS anódica cerebelar e cinesioterapia, em sessões múltiplas diárias para reabilitação da ataxia cerebelar. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Este relato de caso incluiu um paciente do sexo masculino, de 34 anos, com história de ataxia espinocerebelar há 10 anos. Seus principais objetivos eram melhorar a marcha e o equilíbrio. Ele apresentava ataxia axial e apendicular, dificuldades na marcha e no equilíbrio. O protocolo de estimulação do cerebelo consistiu na aplicação de tDCS por 20 minutos, 2mA, diariamente, durante duas semanas, com ânodo posicionado sobre o ínion e cátodo sobre o músculo deltóide direito. A cinesioterapia simultânea incluiu exercícios funcionais progressivos com objetivo principal de treinamento de equilíbrio. RESULTADOS: A melhora clínica foi particularmente evidenciada por uma redução de 4 pontos na Escala para Avaliação e Graduação da Ataxia após 10 sessões, enquanto a literatura recomenda a eficácia de uma nova terapia que retardaria a progressão da ataxia em 1 ponto por ano. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados sugerem que a associação entre tDCS e cinesioterapia foi eficaz neste paciente; as sessões de tDCS foram seguras e bem toleradas e podem ter desempenhado um papel na melhora nos testes funcionais. Novos estudos controlados envolvendo um número maior de pacientes são necessários para analisar os benefícios destas técnicas combinadas para maximizar a reabilitação motora nesta população.

Background: Epcoritamab, a bispecific antibody, binds to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on B cells to induce T-cell-mediated killing of CD20+ malignant B cells. For T-cell engagers, CRS is a potential adverse event. Step-up dosing (SUD) is used to mitigate potential severe CRS symptoms. Identification of optimal SUD is challenging because multiple steps of dose escalation are needed to manage CRS. Based on a dose-escalation study of epcoritamab, 2-step SUD (weekly priming and intermediate dose prior to administering the target dose) was necessary to effectively mitigate the risk of CRS. A wide range of priming (0.004-0.16 mg) and intermediate (0.0128-1.6 mg) doses for 17 combinations was explored; the 0.16/0.8/48-mg regimen was selected based on the CRS event rate. We further explored optimization of the SUD regimen using a model-based approach to inform clinical evaluation. Methods: A repeated time-to-event model was developed using pharmacokinetic and CRS event data collected in the phase 1/2 EPCORE NHL-1 monotherapy trial. The model was required to predict the onset of 1 or more CRS events (all-grade and grade ≥2) over time and to describe the impact of epcoritamab concentration on CRS risk over time and the development of tolerance after multiple doses. To capture these dynamics, the hazard function (risk of CRS event) was modeled as the product of 2 components: the first component addressed the risk of a CRS event and allowed for increasing hazard with increasing epcoritamab plasma concentrations, and the second component described the inhibition of the hazard to capture development of CRS tolerance over time after multiple doses. Simulations assessed the performance of different SUD regimens, measured by the probability of a grade ≥2 CRS event. Results: The model was able to predict the observed CRS events over time and confirmed that the SUD regimen used in the recommended phase 2 dose regimen for epcoritamab (0.16/0.8/48 mg) provided similar or better potential to reduce the risk of grade ≥2 CRS events versus other priming and intermediate dose permutations tested during dose escalation in the EPCORE NHL-1 trial. The validated model was used to further explore a large number of SUD regimens not studied in clinical trials. Based on model predictions, alternative SUD regimens can potentially lead to a small reduction in risk of grade ≥2 CRS. To further assess this, alternative SUD regimens were selected for potential clinical assessment. Conclusions: A dynamic model for CRS was successfully developed, validated, and applied to aid the optimization of an epcoritamab SUD regimen. The model-based optimization of SUD informed and narrowed down the number of doses/cohorts to be tested in clinical trials, simplified study design, and played a critical role in expediting the optimization of the epcoritamab SUD regimen. Citation Format: Tommy Li, Daniel Polhamus, Craig Thalhauser, Apurvasena Parikh, Manish Gupta, Mariana Sacchi, Steven Xu. Simplifying selection and optimization of step-up dosing of subcutaneous Epcoritamab to mitigate CRS risk using repeated time-to-event modeling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2798.

Introduction: B-cell lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease with an unmet medical need for efficacious, well tolerated, off-the-shelf therapies that can combine with standard of care (SOC) regimens. Epcoritamab is an IgG1 bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on malignant B cells, inducing activation and cytotoxic activity of T cells and enabling killing of target lymphoma cells. Epcoritamab is well suited for combination therapy due to its distinct mechanism of action from that of many SOC regimens that may lead to improved clinical responses. Herein we evaluated the longitudinal pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of epcoritamab in clinical trial patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated as monotherapy (EPCORE NHL-1: NCT03625037) and in combination with SOC therapies (EPCORE NHL-2: NCT04663347). Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL from EPCORE NHL-1 expansion phase received subcutaneous epcoritamab administered in 28-d cycles. Patients with newly diagnosed or R/R DLBCL from EPCORE NHL-2 received epcoritamab administered with a dosing schedule similar to that in EPCORE NHL-1, in combination with SOC therapies: R-CHOP, R-DHAX/C and GemOx. Biomarkers in fresh whole blood were assessed using validated flow cytometry assays. Cytokine levels in plasma were tested using a validated multiplex immunoassay. Results: Epcoritamab monotherapy induced rapid (within the first cycle), sustained depletion of circulating peripheral B cells (CD19+) in patients with detectable peripheral B cells at baseline. A similar pattern of peripheral B-cell depletion was observed for epcoritamab in combination with SOC. Approximately 24 h following the first full dose, epcoritamab monotherapy induced a moderate but transient elevation of circulating cytokines IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-10. These cytokine patterns were similar for epcoritamab in combination with SOC. Within the first 8 wk of dosing, both epcoritamab monotherapy and in combination with SOC induced a transient elevation of percentages of peripheral CD8+ T cells expressing proliferation (Ki67) and activation (HLA-DR) markers. Expansion of peripheral CD8+ T cells and their effector memory subsets was observed with epcoritamab monotherapy, as well as in combination with SOC in later cycles. Peripheral CD4+ T cells demonstrated patterns similar to most of the biomarker observations in CD8+ T cells with epcoritamab as monotherapy and in combination. Conclusion: These biomarker analyses show that the PD characteristics of epcoritamab monotherapy are maintained overall in combination with SOC therapies containing chemotherapeutic agents with or without rituximab and support the ongoing clinical studies investigating the combination of epcoritamab with SOC therapies in patients with DLBCL. Citation Format: Jimin Zhang, Han Si, Monica Wielgos-Bonvallet, David Soong, Edith Szafer-Glusman, Herve Ghesquieres, Chan Y. Cheah, Lorenzo Falchi, Joshua Brody, Mariana Sacchi, Ali Rana, Brandon Higgs, Brian Elliot, Maria Jure-Kunkel, Christopher W. Chiu. Pharmacodynamic activity of epcoritamab (GEN3013; CD3xCD20) as monotherapy is maintained in combination with standard of care therapies in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3248.

Context: Treatment options that are more tolerable, readily available, and capable of inducing deep and durable responses are needed in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Epcoritamab is a novel, subcutaneous (SC) CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody with preliminary potent antitumor activity. Objective: Report primary results from the LBCL expansion cohort in the phase 2 study of SC epcoritamab in patients with R/R B-cell NHL (EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037). Patients: Adults with R/R CD20+ LBCL were included. Patients had DLBCL (including double/triple-hit and transformed), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), primary mediastinal LBCL (PMBCL), or follicular lymphoma (FL) grade (G) 3B. As of January 31, 2022, 157 patients were treated. Interventions: Patients received epcoritamab (priming and intermediate doses followed by 48 mg) as 1-mL SC injections (QW, cycle [C] 1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: The 157 patients had a median of 3 (range, 2–11) prior lines of therapy (LOT), 61 (38.9%) received prior CAR T, 61% had primary refractory disease, and 83% were refractory to the last LOT. With a median follow-up of 10.7 mo, the overall response rate (ORR) by IRC (Lugano/PET-CT) was 63% with 39% complete response (CR). ORR/CR rates were 69%/42% for CAR T–naive patients and 54%/34% for CAR T–exposed patients. Median duration of response was 12 mo overall and not reached among complete responders. ORR was similar across prespecified subgroups of age, prior LOT, and de novo or transformed disease. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were CRS (49.7%; 31.8% G1, 15.3% G2, 2.5% G3), pyrexia (23.6%), fatigue (22.9%), neutropenia (21.7%), and diarrhea (20.4%). Ten patients (6.4%) experienced ICANS; all but one event was G1–2, and the G5 ICANS was the only treatment-related death. Conclusions: Epcoritamab is a convenient, SC, off-the-shelf therapy that demonstrated clinically meaningful, compelling efficacy including deep and durable responses in a challenging-to-treat, highly refractory LBCL population. Efficacy was observed in both CAR T–exposed and CAR T–naive patients. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous findings. Funding: This study was funded by Genmab A/S and AbbVie.

PURPOSE Nivolumab, an anti–programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated frequent and durable responses in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We report results from Cohort D of the CheckMate 205 trial, which assessed nivolumab monotherapy followed by nivolumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) for newly diagnosed cHL. METHODS Patients 18 years of age or older with untreated, advanced-stage (defined as III to IV and IIB with unfavorable risk factors) cHL were eligible for Cohort D of this multicenter, noncomparative, phase II trial. Patients received nivolumab monotherapy for four doses, followed by 12 doses of N-AVD; all doses were every 2 weeks, and nivolumab was administered at 240 mg intravenously. The primary end point was safety. Efficacy end points included objective response rate and modified progression-free survival, defined as time to disease progression/relapse, death, or next therapy. Chromosome 9p24.1 alterations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression were assessed in Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg cells in evaluable patients. RESULTS A total of 51 patients were enrolled and treated. At diagnosis, 49% of patients had an International Prognostic Score of 3 or greater. Overall, 59% experienced a grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event. Treatment-related febrile neutropenia was reported in 10% of patients. Endocrine immune-mediated adverse events were all grade 1 to 2 and did not require high-dose corticosteroids; all nonendocrine immune-mediated adverse events resolved (most commonly, rash; 5.9%). At the end of therapy, the objective response rate (95% CI) per independent radiology review committee was 84% (71% to 93%), with 67% (52% to 79%), achieving complete remission (five patients [10%] were nonevaluable and counted as nonresponders). With a minimum follow-up of 9.4 months, 9-month modified progression-free survival was 92%. Patients with higher-level Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg programmed death-ligand 1 expression had more favorable responses to N-AVD ( P = .041). CONCLUSION Nivolumab followed by N-AVD was associated with promising efficacy and safety profiles for newly diagnosed, advanced-stage cHL.

Background: Patients (pts) with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) frequently experience reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (Oerlemans et al, Ann Hematol 2011). Nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy and clinically meaningful improvement in pt-reported outcomes (PROs) in pts with relapsed/refractory cHL in cohorts A, B, and C of CheckMate 205 (NCT02181738) (Armand et al, J Clin Oncol 2018; Engert et al, ASH 2017). Nivolumab monotherapy followed by nivolumab + doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (N-AVD) demonstrated an objective response rate of 84% in newly diagnosed cHL (cohort D of CheckMate 205; Ramchandren et al, EHA 2018). We present PROs in CheckMate 205 cohort D. Methods: Pts ≥18 years of age with untreated, advanced-stage cHL, with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–1 received 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg IV Q2W) followed by N-AVD for 6 cycles (12 doses). Pts then entered the follow-up (FU) period. PROs were an exploratory endpoint, assessed using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions-3 level (EQ-5D-3L) and associated visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) in all treated pts who had both a baseline (monotherapy cycle 1) and post-baseline assessment. EQ-VAS ranges from 0–100, with higher scores indicating better HRQoL. In EQ-5D-3L, pts can report no, some, or extreme problems in each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, activity, pain, and anxiety). Results: 51 pts were treated. At baseline, median age was 37 years, 63% were male, 59% had ECOG PS of 0. 49 pts (96%) completed baseline EQ-VAS. Mean EQ-VAS scores exceeded the mean baseline score at the end of monotherapy, after 2 combination cycles, at the end of therapy, and during follow-up (Table 1). The proportion of pts reporting some or extreme problems in EQ-5D-3L was numerically lower than or similar to baseline after monotherapy for all dimensions, but was numerically higher than baseline (dimensions of mobility and activity) after 2 combination cycles, and remained close to or numerically below baseline during follow-up (dimensions of self-care, activity, pain, and anxiety). Conclusions: Pt-reported HRQoL, as assessed by observed mean EQ-VAS scores, did not deteriorate from baseline during treatment with nivolumab followed by N-AVD. Proportions of pts reporting problems in individual EQ-5D-3L dimensions were generally similar to baseline during treatment and follow-up.

This phase 1-2 study evaluated brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with nivolumab (Nivo) as first salvage therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In parts 1 and 2, patients received staggered dosing of BV and Nivo in cycle 1, followed by same-day dosing in cycles 2 to 4. In part 3, both study drugs were dosed, same day, for all 4 cycles. At end of study treatment, patients could undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) per investigator discretion. The objective response rate (ORR; N = 91) was 85%, with 67% achieving a complete response (CR). At a median follow-up of 34.3 months, the estimated progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 years was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65% to 86%) and 91% (95% CI, 79% to 96%) for patients undergoing ASCT directly after study treatment. Overall survival at 3 years was 93% (95% CI, 85% to 97%). The most common adverse events (AEs) prior to ASCT were nausea (52%) and infusion-related reactions (43%), all grade 1 or 2. A total of 16 patients (18%) had immune-related AEs that required systemic corticosteroid treatment. Peripheral blood immune signatures were consistent with an activated T-cell response. Median gene expression of CD30 in tumors was higher in patients who responded compared with those who did not. Longer-term follow-up of BV and Nivo as a first salvage regimen shows durable efficacy and impressive PFS, especially in patients who proceeded directly to transplant, without additional toxicity concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02572167.

Introduction: Mediastinal gray zone lymphoma (MGZL) is an extremely rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a predominance in young men and with features that are intermediate between nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL). Shared features of these tumor types include tumor CD30 expression and the presence of 9p24.1 chromosomal alterations with expression of programmed death 1 (PD-1) ligand. Compared with PMBL, patients (pts) with MGZL have inferior survival outcomes when treated with conventional chemotherapy (Wilson et al. Blood 2014). Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody; brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate. In the CheckMate 436 study, the combination of nivolumab and BV demonstrated a high objective response rate (ORR; 73%) and complete response (CR) rate (37%) in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) PMBL (Zinzani et al. J Clin Oncol 2019). A separate study in R/R cHL also showed impressive efficacy (ORR: 82%; CR: 61%), suggesting some complementary action between the two agents (Herrara et al. Blood 2018). A case series highlighted the clinical activity of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy in R/R MGZL (Melani et al. N Engl J Med 2017). Given the overlapping features of MGZL with PMBL and cHL, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab + BV in a separate MGZL cohort in CheckMate 436. Methods: The expansion cohort of the open-label, phase 1/2 CheckMate 436 (NCT02581631) study enrolled pts ≥ 18 years old with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and with confirmed R/R MGZL after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) or, if ineligible for auto-HCT, after ≥ 2 multi-agent chemotherapy regimens. Pts received 240 mg nivolumab (on Day 8 of Cycle 1, then Day 1 of following cycles) and 1.8 mg/kg BV (on Day 1 of each cycle) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR per the Lugano 2014 criteria and safety. Key secondary endpoints included CR rate, overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 10 pts were treated and evaluable. Median age (range) was 35 (25-72) years, with only 1 pt aged > 65 years (72 years). Six pts (60%) were male; all pts had a mediastinal mass. Pts had a median of 2 prior lines of systemic cancer therapy, and none had received prior auto-HCT. At database lock, 8 months after the last pt received the first treatment, all pts had discontinued treatment (5 due to disease progression, 3 due to maximum clinical benefit, 1 due to allogenic [allo]-HCT, and 1 due to auto-HCT). Pts received a median of 7 doses of nivolumab and 7 doses of BV. ORR per investigator was 70% (80% CI, 45-88), with 5 pts (50%) achieving CR (Table). The time to CR was 1.2-1.3 months and the duration of CR was 1.5-3.2 months before pts were censored for subsequent therapy. The 5 pts who achieved CR were bridged to hematopoietic cell transplantation (4 allo- and 1 auto-HCT) and censored (all were alive at database lock). Eight pts (89%) who were evaluable for response had tumor reduction of > 25% (Figure). At a median follow-up of 12.4 (range, 0.1-25.5) months, the 6-month OS rate was 80.0% (95% CI, 40.9-94.6). DOR and PFS could not be estimated due to earlier censoring of pts who received subsequent therapies. Nine pts (90%) experienced any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); the most common any grade TRAEs were neutropenia (n = 3; 1 grade 1, 1 grade 2, 1 experienced 4 grade 1/2 events and 1 grade 3 event) and paresthesia (n = 3; all grade 1). Three pts (30%) had grade 3-4 TRAEs. Infusion-related reaction occurred in 1 pt (grade 1). One pt had an immune-mediated AE (grade 2 maculo-papular rash, which resolved without systemic steroids). A serious drug-related AE occurred in 1 elderly pt (grade 3 febrile neutropenia). There were 3 deaths, all caused by disease progression. Conclusions: Nivolumab + BV demonstrated a high investigator-assessed ORR of 70%, with a 50% CR rate and a tolerable safety profile in pts with R/R MGZL, similar to findings in PMBL. The regimen represents a potential option for bridging to hematopoietic cell transplantation based on the brisk and frequent responses and a safety profile that compares favorably with historic data using standard chemotherapy regimens. Study support: BMS. Writing support: Jane Cheung, Caudex, funded by BMS. Figure 1 Disclosures Santoro: Takeda, Roche, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, AstraZeneca, ArQule, Lilly, Sandoz, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD: Speakers Bureau; Arqule, Sanofi: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb, SERVIER, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD, Sanofi, ArQule: Consultancy; Takeda, Roche, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, AstraZeneca, ArQule, Lilly, Sandoz, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb, SERVIER, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD, Sanofi, ArQule: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb, SERVIER, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD, Sanofi, ArQule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Moskowitz:Merck: Consultancy; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Carlo-Stella:Servier, Novartis, Genenta Science srl, ADC Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Karyopharm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics and Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Francis:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sacchi:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Current Employment. Savage:Roche (institutional): Research Funding; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Servier: Consultancy; BeiGene: Other: Steering Committee; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab was used in combination with brentuximab vedotin (BV) for evaluation of its efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory mediastinal gray zone lymphoma.

Background Outcomes for younger patients with R/R cHL are poor, particularly for those without complete metabolic response (CMR) before autologous transplant (auto-HCT). CheckMate 744 ( NCT02927769 ) is an ongoing phase 2 study for CAYA with R/R cHL, evaluating a risk-stratified, response-adapted approach using nivolumab plus BV, and for patients without CMR, BV plus bendamustine. In the initial analysis of the standard-risk cohort (R2), the regimen was well tolerated with high CMR rates before consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus auto-HCT. We report primary analysis data. Patients 5–30 years old; had first-line treatment without auto-HCT. Design Risk stratification has been described (Harker-Murray, ASH 2018). Patients received 4 induction cycles of nivolumab plus BV; patients without CMR by blinded independent central review (BICR) received BV plus bendamustine intensification. Patients with CMR at any time could proceed to consolidation off study. Response was per Lugano 2014 criteria. Primary endpoint: CMR rate (Deauville ≤3) per BICR any time before consolidation. Results 44 patients were treated in R2 (median follow-up: 20.9 months); 43 received 4 induction cycles and 11 received intensification. Median age was 16 years (range, 9–30); 24 (55%) patients had primary refractory cHL. CMR rate (90% CI) any time before consolidation was 88% (77–95) and 89% (78–95) per BICR and investigator, respectively; objective response rate (ORR) was 98% by either assessment. After 4 cycles of induction, CMR was 59% and 66% per BICR and investigator, respectively; ORR (90% CI) was 82% (70–91) and 89% (78–95), respectively. One-year progression-free survival rate by BICR was 91% (90% CI, 77–96). During induction, 8 patients (18%) experienced grade (G) 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); the most common any-grade TRAEs were nausea and hypersensitivity (20% each). One TRAE led to discontinuation (G3 anaphylaxis). Most treatment-related immune-mediated AEs were G1–2 (1 patient had 2 G3 infusion-related reactions). Conclusions This risk-stratified, response-adapted approach offers a well-tolerated salvage strategy with high CMR rates and no new safety signals for CAYA with R/R cHL. Most patients avoided bendamustine prior to consolidation. Further follow-up may confirm durability of disease control. Funding BMS. Previous presentation ASCO 2020

In this study, we evaluated homeostatic and functional disorders of the spleen in mice inoculated with Toxoplasma gondii. The kinetics of megakaryocyte and leukocyte production, body and spleen mass and certain histopathological aspects were analyzed. There was increased (P

The climatic changes that occurred during the late Pleistocene-early Holocene in Patagonia generated a glacial retreat, which brought along with it the formation of proglacial lakes (in contact with ice) and periglacial lakes (in areas close to the glaciers). The bathymetric fluctuations of lacustrine systems throughout time have favored new areas available for population circulation and settlement. Our results showed the influence of ice masses on the palaeoenvironmental evolution with alternating glacial and proglacial environments: tillites, glacilacustrine/lacustrine environments, glacifluvial/fluvial environments, alluvial fans, and deltaic bodies. An initial diachronism was recorded in the formation of the paleolakes; the Lacustrine System Parque Nacional Perito Moreno (SL-PNPM) would have begun to form first, and then the Lacustrine System Pueyrredón – Posadas – Salitroso (SL-PPS). Between 12 and 11.7 kyr, in both sectors, the paleolakes would have reached their maximum areal extension. After 10 kyr, a regression and separation of the lacustrine systems until the acquisition of its current configuration was interpreted. This data coincides with archaeological sites located at lower elevations, closer to the current level of the coastline, both in the SL-PPS and the SL-PNPM areas. The palaeoenvironmental information indicated a synchrony in both areas in the evolution of the floristic landscape. The separation of lacustrine systems generated new available spaces and ecological niches for the establishment of vegetation which encouraged a greater heterogeneity in vegetation that could have been exploited by hunter-gatherer groups. Fil: Horta, Luis Rubén. Universidad Nacional de La Rioja; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales; Argentina Fil: Marcos, Maria Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina Fil: Sacchi, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Bozzuto, Damian Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Georgieff, Sergio Miguel. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Mancini, María V.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina Fil: Civalero, Maria Teresa. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina

En este trabajo se presentan los resultados obtenidos a partir de prospecciones y excavaciones arqueológicas realizadas en Aldea Beleiro, SO de la provincia de Chubut (Departamento de Río Senguer), entre los años 2010 y 2013. Uno de los objetivos de esta investigación es recuperar la historia de la ocupación de la región, desde su poblamiento inicial hasta los asentamientos de los primeros criollos y europeos de comienzos del siglo XX. Hasta el momento, los trabajos se centraron en el estudio del sitio Casa de Piedra (Estancia Roselló), particularmente en la excavación de su cueva principal (CP1), en donde se ha recuperado abundante material lítico y faunístico en nueve capas sedimentarias. Por su parte, los sitios que corresponden a los primeros pobladores europeos están representados por restos de estructuras construidas con distintos materiales y acusan un uso diferencial del espacio doméstico. Este trabajo se presenta con el objetivo principal de dar a conocer esta nueva área de investigación y los resultados de los fechados realizados en CP1, únicos para la zona. This paper presents the results obtained from surveys and archaeological excavations carried out in Aldea Beleiro, southwest of Chubut (Río Senguer department), between 2010 and 2013. One of the aims of this research is to recover the history of the occupation of the region, from initial settlement until the settlement of the first creoles and europeans of the early twentieth century. So far, the work focused on the study of Casa de Piedra (Ea. Rosello), particularly in the excavation of the main cave (CP1), where has been recovered abundant lithic and faunal material in nine sedimentary layers. Furthermore, the sites of the first european settlers are represented by remains of structures built with different materials and indicate a differential use of domestic space. This work is presented in order to announce this new area of research and the dates achieved in CP1, unique to the area. Fil: Castro, Analia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina Fil: Casanueva, María Laura. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina Fil: Sacchi, Mariana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Peréz de Micou, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina

This work constitutes an integration of geological, archaeological and palynological data from Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, for assessing the influence of paleogeographic and paleoclimatic changes in relation to the dynamics of human occupation during the Holocene. In order to carry out its objectives, we surveyed different archaeological sites, we collected pollen samples from two archaeological sites, and described, sampled and dated stratigraphic profiles of lake levels. A digital elevation model was also developed to reconstruct old flooded areas. Given the obtained results, we observe the influence that paleogeographic changes could have had on human occupational dynamics. These changes may have opened up new areas for both settlement and mobility. Pollen records suggest a vegetation change from grass steppe to shrub steppe during the Middle Holocene, most likely related to climate changes identified at a regional scale. Fil: Horta, Luis Rubén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Estudios Sociales; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Rioja; Argentina Fil: Marcos, Maria Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencia Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina Fil: Bozzuto, Damian Leandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina Fil: Mancini, Maria Virginia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencia Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras; Argentina Fil: Sacchi, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación. Dirección Nacional de Cultura y Museos. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano; Argentina

8013 Background: Outcomes for younger patients (pts) with R/R cHL are poor, particularly for those without complete metabolic response (CMR) before autologous transplant (auto-HCT). Nivolumab + BV has shown 67% CMR and a high 2-y PFS rate as first salvage in adults with R/R cHL. CheckMate 744 (NCT02927769) is an ongoing phase 2 study for CAYA with R/R cHL, evaluating a risk-stratified, response-adapted approach using nivolumab + BV and, for pts without CMR, BV + bendamustine. In the initial analysis of the standard-risk cohort (R2), the regimen was well tolerated with high CMR rates before consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus auto-HCT. We report data from the primary analysis. Methods: Pts were aged 5–30 y and had first-line treatment (tx) without auto-HCT. Risk stratification has been described previously (Harker-Murray, ASH 2018). Pts received 4 induction cycles of nivolumab + BV; pts without CMR by blinded independent central review (BICR) received BV + bendamustine intensification. Pts with CMR at any time could proceed to consolidation off study. Response was per Lugano 2014 criteria. Primary endpoint: CMR rate (Deauville ≤3) per BICR any time before consolidation. Results: At database lock, 44 pts were treated in R2 (median follow up: 20.9 mo); 43 received 4 induction cycles and 11 received intensification. Median age was 16 y (range 9–30); 24 (55%) pts had primary refractory cHL and 20 had relapsed cHL. CMR rates and ORR any time before consolidation and after induction are shown in Table. 1-y PFS rate by BICR was 91% (90% CI 77–96). During induction, 8 (18%) pts experienced grade (G) 3–4 tx-related adverse events (TRAEs); the most common any grade TRAEs were nausea and hypersensitivity (20% each). 1 TRAE led to discontinuation (G3 anaphylaxis). Most tx-related immune-mediated AEs were G1–2 (1 pt had 2 G3 infusion-related reactions). Conclusions: This risk-stratified, response-adapted approach offers a well-tolerated salvage strategy with high CMR rates and no new safety signals for CAYA with R/R cHL. Most pts avoided alkylator exposure prior to consolidation. Further follow up may confirm durability of disease control. Clinical trial information: NCT02927769 . [Table: see text]

This paper discusses different aspects related to the andesite and obsidian availability and circulation routes in different moments of the occupation sequence in the Pueyrredón-Posadas-Salitroso (PPS) Lake Basin in the north, and the Burmeister-Belgrano (BB) Lake Basin to the south (north-west Santa Cruz province, Argentinian Patagonia). The distribution of raw materials - both in space and time - allows us to assert that potential regional circulation routes would have been affected differentially by the palaeolakes present from the Pleistocene up until the mid-Holocene. We are taking into account three sites: Cueva Milodón Norte 1 (CMN1), located in the northeast coast of the Pueyrredón Lake, Cerro de los Indios 1 (CI1) (central portion of the PPS Basin), and Cerro Casa de Piedra 7 (CCP7) (near to the Burmeister Lake). This investigation considers six periods, based on the calibrated ranges from 73 radiocarbon dates: 17 from CI1, 14 from CMN1, and 42 radiocarbon dates from CCP7. As a result of this analysis we can conclude that, in sites with a higher density of occupation such as CI1 and CCP7, the use of obsidian (non-local rock) and andesite or basalt did not vary over time. In the case of CMN1, access to the sources of these raw materials varied according to the presence of large bodies of water, although it does not seem to have influenced the procurement of these rocks.

In this paper, a robotic telescope-centric high-school level astronomy education project, Our Solar Siblings (OSS) is outlined. The project, an LCO official education partner, was formed as an institution-independent non-profit collaboration of volunteers officially in 2014, although the first version of the curriculum materials and approach was initially first designed in 2010. We outline the five goals of the project and the three approaches (formal classroom, independent student research and providing support to similar endeavours) we implement to try and achieve these goals. The curriculum materials, a central part of the project, are outlined as are their connections to various curriculum. The independent research project aspect and recent activity is presented. The article concludes with a brief update on the OSS evaluation which drives the educational design and the project’s future directions as of 2017.

Purpose Safe, effective treatments are needed for pediatric patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Dasatinib is approved for treatment of adults and children with CML-CP. A phase I study determined suitable dosing for children with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) leukemias. Methods CA180-226/NCT00777036 is a phase II, open-label, nonrandomized prospective trial of patients < 18 years of age receiving dasatinib. There are three cohorts: (1) imatinib-resistant/intolerant CML-CP, (2) imatinib-resistant/intolerant CML in accelerated/blast phase or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 17), and (3) newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with tablets or powder for oral suspension. Major cytogenetic response > 30% for imatinib-resistant/intolerant patients and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) > 55% for newly diagnosed patients were of clinical interest. Results Of 113 patients with CML-CP, 14 (48%) who were imatinib-resistant/intolerant and 61 (73%) who were newly diagnosed remained on treatment at time of analysis. Major cytogenetic response > 30% was reached by 3 months in the imatinib-resistant/intolerant group and CCyR > 55% was reached by 6 months in the newly diagnosed CML-CP group. CCyR and major molecular response by 12 months, respectively, were 76% and 41% in the imatinib-resistant/intolerant group and 92% and 52% in newly diagnosed CML-CP group. Progression-free survival by 48 months was 78% and 93% in the imatinib-resistant/intolerant and newly diagnosed CML-CP groups, respectively. No dasatinib-related pleural or pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema, or pulmonary arterial hypertension were reported. Bone growth and development events were reported in 4% of patients. Conclusion In the largest prospective trial to date in children with CML-CP, we demonstrate that dasatinib is a safe, effective treatment of pediatric CML-CP. Target responses to first- or second-line dasatinib were met early, and deep molecular responses were observed. Safety of dasatinib in pediatric patients was similar to that observed in adults; however, no cases of pleural or pericardial effusion or pulmonary arterial hypertension were reported.

El objetivo de este trabajo es vincular la tecnología lítica y la circulación de información a través de la transmisión del conocimiento. Se utiliza como fuente de datos el análisis del material lítico de tres sitios procedentes de Patagonia Centro-Meridional, Argentina, y el análisis de material lítico experimental. Se analizan los índices de eficiencia para la talla, así como la presencia de diferentes tipos de errores que se identificaron como producto de talladores con menor experiencia. La presencia de estos tipos de materiales se relaciona con la posible presencia de redes sociales en el área analizada. Finalmente se plantea la posibilidad de identificación de los distintos sitios a partir de las actividades de talla realizadas en ellos. The aim of this paper is to link lithic technology and the flow of information through the transmission of knowledge. The analysis of lithic material from three sites of Central Southern Patagonia, Argentina, and experimental analysis of lithic material are used as data source. Efficiency ratios are analyzed, as well as the presence of different types of errors that were identified as a result of less experienced knappers. The presence of these types of materials is related to the possible presence of social networks in the area analyzed. Finally, the possibility of identifying individual sites from knapping activities is developed.

Introduction Brentuximab vedotin (BV) targets CD30, a receptor expressed on the Reed-Sternberg cells of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Nivolumab (Nivo) restores antitumor immunity by blocking the PD-1 receptor on activated T-cells. In this phase 1/2 study, combination treatment (tx) with BV + Nivo demonstrated durable efficacy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL (Herrera, Blood 2018; NCT02572167). Biomarkers consistent with innate and adaptive immune activation were observed in the peripheral blood of pts treated with the combination regimen. Herein, we associate biomarkers in the peripheral blood with clinical response, and present follow-up results for pts who received BV + Nivo under staggered and concurrent dosing schedules. Methods Enrolled pts had cHL that relapsed or was refractory to frontline chemotherapy. In Parts 1 and 2 (staggered dosing), pts received up to 4 cycles of BV 1.8 mg/kg and Nivo 3.0 mg/kg given on Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 1, respectively, and together on Day 1 of Cycles 2-4. Pts in Part 3 (concurrent dosing) received the same dose of both agents on Day 1 of all 4 cycles. After investigators assessed response (Cheson 2014, with the incorporation of LYRIC [Cheson 2016] for pts in Part 3), pts could undergo ASCT. Results Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across all treated pts (N=91) in the staggered and concurrent dosing cohorts; median age 34 years (yrs, range; 18-69), 42% with primary refractory disease, and 30% with relapse within 1 yr of frontline therapy. All 91 pts are off-tx and have been observed through the 100-day safety reporting period. A total of 86 pts (92%) completed all 4 cycles of BV + Nivo. Early tx discontinuations were due to; AE (peripheral neuropathy and increased GGT [1 pt each]), progressive disease (PD), investigator decision, and pt decision (1 pt each). Most common AEs prior to ASCT or additional salvage therapy were nausea (52%) and infusion-related reactions (IRRs, 43%). Excluding IRRs, 14% of pts had immune-related AEs requiring tx with systemic steroids, including rash (8%), pneumonitis (4%), and AST increased, diarrhea, and Guillain-Barre syndrome (1% each). The ORR for all-treated pts was 85%, with 67% complete response (CR). A total of 67 pts (74%) underwent ASCT after tx with BV + Nivo. There were 22 pts who received additional salvage therapy after BV + Nivo (7 PD, 6 partial response, 5 stable disease, and 4 CR at EOT), 17 of whom later underwent ASCT. At a median of 22.6 months (range; 1.2, 41.2) from the start of tx, the estimated 2-yr PFS rate in all treated pts was 78%, and for pts who underwent ASCT after tx with BV + Nivo was 91% (Figure 1). At 2 years, the estimated OS rate for all treated pts was 93%. Staggered and concurrent dosing of BV + Nivo resulted in increased levels of activated and dividing CD4+ T cells, activated and dividing CD8+ T cells (concurrent dosing-only), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and circulating plasmablasts in blood. We did not observe any associations between the magnitude of these changes and clinical response. Pts with CR exhibited trends for higher pre-tx blood levels of CD30+ Tregs and CD30+ Th subsets compared to pts without CR, suggesting BV depletion of these populations may have a role in the clinical mode of action of BV + Nivo. Although pre-tx levels of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) in blood did not differentiate pts with CR from other pts, pts in the lower quartile of pre-tx CTL levels showed significantly shorter PFS than other pts, suggesting a potential association between CTLs and disease control. Changes in blood cytokine and chemokine levels were observed after BV + Nivo, including increased levels of IL-18, IP-10, I-TAC, and sCD30, and decreased levels of TARC, IL-2Ra, and IL-6. Our analyses support strong correlations between pre-tx cytokine/chemokine levels and clinical benefit including trends linking lower pre-tx levels of IL-18, I-TAC, and IL-2RA to achieving CR and longer PFS. Conclusion BV + Nivo, both staggered and current dosing, showed tolerability and high CR rates with durable remissions among pts with R/R cHL. Analysis of blood biomarkers identified trends potentially linking baseline levels of CD30+ immune cells and the baseline pt inflammatory state with the activity of BV + Nivo. Together, these encouraging results support further investigation of BV + Nivo as initial salvage therapy in pts with R/R cHL. Figure 1 Disclosures Moskowitz: Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; miRagen Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech Pharma: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Advani:Celmed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Infinity Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc./Kite Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Developments, Inc.: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys: Research Funding; Cell Medica, Ltd: Consultancy; Stanford University: Employment, Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bartlett:Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Vose:Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Grants, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Grants, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Ramchandren:Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an Abbvie company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Sandoz-Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feldman:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Portola Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Viracta: Research Funding. LaCasce:BMS: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Christian:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Moskowitz:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Brown:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Taft:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ansari:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zak:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sacchi:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Manley:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Herrera:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Introduction: The phase 2 CheckMate 205 study (NCT02181738) of nivolumab (nivo) has demonstrated high objective response rates (ORRs), durable efficacy, prolonged overall survival (OS), and an acceptable safety profile in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) after failure of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) irrespective of prior brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment (Armand et al, J Clin Oncol 2018). Atypical response patterns have been observed with checkpoint inhibitors, and clinical benefits may be experienced by pts who are treated beyond progression (TBP) as defined by conventional criteria (Cheson et al, Blood 2016; Younes et al, Ann Oncol 2017). Stable reductions in tumor burden without symptoms of active disease were seen in pts TBP in CheckMate 205, suggesting that pts might continue to derive clinical benefits from nivo beyond disease progression. As TBP was an option for some pts in CheckMate 205, we report here updated outcomes of those pts. Methods: This single-arm, multicenter study enrolled pts (age ≥18 y) with R/R cHL after failure of auto-HCT into 3 cohorts (A: BV naïve; B: BV after auto-HCT; C: BV before and/or after auto-HCT). Nivo was administered at 3 mg/kg IV every 2 wk until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (or after 1 year in complete response [CR] for cohort C). Response was assessed by 2007 International Working Group (IWG) criteria. A protocol amendment allowed pts with stable performance status and perceived clinical benefit to be TBP per investigator assessment. Tumor burden after initial progression was assessed; exploratory analyses included OS and time to next therapy (TTNT). Pts TBP were further categorized as PD-1 resistant (failure to achieve CR/partial response [PR] during initial treatment with nivo or CR/PR with subsequent progressive disease [PD] ≤90 d of response) and non-resistant pts (CR/PR followed by PD >90 d from response). Results: At data cutoff, 130 pts had PD, among whom 80 (62%) were TBP, and 50 (38%) were not (non-TBP). Demographics of pts TBP and non-TBP were similar to the overall study population, although more pts TBP had ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline (59% vs 36%) and stage IV disease at diagnosis (30% vs 22%), but fewer had B symptoms at baseline (23% vs 30%). In pts TBP vs non-TBP, the cause of initial progression was new lesions in 50 (63%) vs 23 (46%), increased total tumor burden in 17 (21%) vs 11 (22%), and non-target lesion progression in 19 (24%) vs 4 (8%) (pts could have multiple reasons for progression). ORR prior to progression was similar between TBP (54%) and non-TBP (64%) pts. At data cutoff, the median (range) doses of nivo given beyond progression was 11 (1-64) and median TBP duration was 5 (95% CI: 3, 7) mo. Nine (11%) pts TBP remained on treatment compared with 2 (4%) non-TBP. The most common reason for discontinuation was further disease progression in 55 (69%) and 28 (56%) pts TBP and non-TBP, respectively. The majority of pts TBP (37/67 evaluable pts) had stable or reduced target lesion tumor burden and most had sustained further reduction compared with the burden presented at the time of disease progression (Figure). There was no discernible difference in the response to TBP between PD-1 resistant vs non-resistant pts. Median OS for pts TBP was not reached; 1- and 2-yr OS (95% CI) was 94% (85, 97) and 87% (77, 93), respectively. Median TTNT was 20 (95% CI: 14, 24) mo for all pts TBP. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 50% of pts after progression vs 68% prior to progression. The most common TRAEs reported after progression were fatigue (8%) and increased lipase (6%). Treatment-related serious AEs after progression were reported in 2 (3%) pts: aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=1) and hypercalcemia (n=1). No deaths occurred in pts TBP. Conclusions: Among pts treated beyond investigator-assessed progression, most commonly due to development of new lesions, continued reductions in tumor burden were observed in a majority with further nivo treatment irrespective of prior PD-1 resistance status. Nivo continued to be well tolerated during TBP with no new safety signals. Pts who have stable performance status despite progression according to conventional criteria may derive continued clinical benefit from TBP. Future work will focus on identifying subsets of pts TBP who may benefit the most from continued nivo treatment. Study support: BMS. Disclosures Cohen: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuruvilla:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ansell:Celldex: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Younes:Abbvie: Honoraria; J&J: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding. Trněný:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Sandoz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board. Ramchandren:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Collins:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Zinzani:Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Boer:EISA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shipp:Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding. Sacchi:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sy:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Armand:Otsuka: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding.

Introduction: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is among the most common malignancies in adolescents and young adults. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are standard for most patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. Current salvage therapies are associated with excessive toxicity and variable complete remission rates (Harker-Murray et al, Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014). Novel regimens that increase remission rates and reduce late effects of therapy are needed, particularly for young patients. Nivolumab (nivo) is a fully human IgG4 anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate. In a phase 1/2 study of adults with R/R cHL, the combination of nivo + BV was well tolerated, with a high response rate as first salvage regimen (Herrera et al, Blood 2018). CheckMate 744 (AHOD1721; NCT02927769) is the first risk-stratified, response-adapted, phase 2 study of nivo + BV, followed by BV + bendamustine for suboptimal response, in children, adolescents, and young adults with R/R cHL with low or standard risk of relapse. Here we report preliminary, investigator (INV)-assessed results from the standard-risk (R2) cohort. Methods: This open-label study enrolled patients aged 5-30 years with pathologically confirmed cHL, excluding nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL, after failure/non-response to first-line therapy and without prior ASCT. Stratification to R2 was based on refractory disease or early relapse; B symptoms, extranodal disease, or extensive disease with radiation therapy (RT) contraindicated at relapse; relapse in a prior RT field; or stage IIIB or IV at initial diagnosis. Patients in R2 received induction (IND) with 4 cycles of nivo + BV. Patients without complete metabolic response (CMR; Deauville score 1-3) received intensification (INT) with 2-4 cycles of BV + bendamustine. Patients with CMR after IND or INT discontinued study treatment, proceeded to HDCT/ASCT, and entered follow-up. Tumors were assessed by INV and blinded independent central review (BICR) per Lugano 2014 criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2014) every 2 treatment cycles. Treatment decisions were based on BICR assessment. The primary endpoint was CMR rate by BICR prior to HDCT/ASCT. Secondary endpoints included INV-assessed response and safety. Results: At database lock (DBL), 32 patients in R2 had entered IND. Median age was 16 y (range 9-30), 78% were aged Conclusion: For children, adolescents, and young adults with standard-risk R/R cHL prior to ASCT, this risk-stratified, response-adapted approach using nivo, BV, and bendamustine resulted in high CMR rates and was well tolerated, making it a promising novel salvage therapy. Most evaluated patients achieved CMR with IND (nivo + BV); all 6 who went to INT (BV + bendamustine) achieved CMR. Updated results based on a planned interim analysis including more patients and BICR-assessed response data will be presented. Study support: Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb in collaboration with Children's Oncology Group (COG) and EuroNet group. Disclosures Leger: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brugieres:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Financial support for SIOP meeting in 2016. Galderisi:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sacchi:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jou:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Other: company stock ownership.

Introduction: Genetic alterations at 9p24.1 resulting in overexpression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) ligands are near-universal in cHL (Roemer et al, J Clin Oncol 2016); cHL may thus be uniquely sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Nivolumab (nivo), an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was associated with an objective response rate (ORR) of 69% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL after auto-HCT and irrespective of prior brentuximab vedotin (BV) in the phase 2 CheckMate 205 study (Armand et al, J Clin Oncol 2018; NCT02181738). Whether some patient (pts) can derive very long clinical benefit, whether depth of response predicts long-term outcome, whether treatment (Tx) can be interrupted in complete remission (CR), and whether the safety profile of nivo in R/R cHL changes with prolonged Tx all remain unclear. We therefore present an updated analysis of CheckMate 205, focusing on long-term efficacy and safety. Methods: This international, single-arm, multi-cohort study enrolled pts aged ≥18 y with R/R cHL after auto-HCT. Pts were BV naïve (Cohort A), had prior BV failure after auto-HCT (Cohort B), or had received BV before and/or after auto-HCT (Cohort C). Pts received nivo 3 mg/kg every 2 wk until disease progression (PD)/unacceptable toxicity. Pts in Cohort C discontinued nivo after 1 y in CR and could resume if they relapsed within 2 y of the last dose. Primary endpoint was ORR per independent radiology review committee (IRC); additional endpoints included duration of response (DOR) per IRC, progression-free survival (PFS) per IRC, overall survival (OS), and safety. Time to next Tx (TTNT: time from first dose to next systemic Tx or death) was an exploratory post-hoc analysis. Responses were assessed using International Working Group 2007 criteria. Results: In total, 243 pts were enrolled to Cohorts A (n=63), B (n=80), and C (n=100). Baseline characteristics have been previously described (Armand et al, J Clin Oncol 2018). At data cut-off, minimum follow-up was 31 mo and 49 pts (20%) were still on Tx; the most common reason for discontinuation was PD (35%). Median duration of Tx was 14 mo. ORR per IRC was 71% (65%, 71%, 75% in Cohorts A, B, C, respectively) with a best overall response (BOR) of CR in 21% (32%, 14%, 20% in Cohorts A, B, C, respectively). Among 51 pts who achieved CR, 20 had CR as the first response and 31 improved from partial remission (PR), mostly (n=28/31) within 1 year of first PR. Median time to response was 2 mo, and to CR was 4 mo. Within the first 6, 12, and 18 mo, 68%, 71%, and 71% of pts, respectively, achieved a response. Median DOR was 18 mo overall, and was 32 and 13 mo in pts with a BOR of CR and PR, respectively. Among responders, 64%, 44%, 31%, and 21% of pts had a DOR of at least 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo, respectively. Overall, 11 pts in Cohort C discontinued with persistent investigator-assessed CR; 2 reinitiated nivo due to PD. Median (95% CI) PFS per IRC among all pts was 15 (11-19) mo (Figure A), and was 17, 12 and 15 mo in Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Median OS was not reached in any cohort; 24-mo OS rates were 90%, 86%, and 86% in Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively, and were similar among pts in CR, PR, or with stable disease (SD; Figure B). Median TTNT was 29, 27, and 20 mo in Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. The most common Tx-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade (G) were fatigue (24%), diarrhea (16%), and rash (12%), each Conclusions: With the longest phase 2-3 study follow-up of a checkpoint inhibitor in R/R cHL to date, nivo was associated with frequent and durable responses regardless of BV Tx history. More than 1 in 5 responders remained in response ≥2 years later. With extended follow-up, additional pts achieved CR in all cohorts. Pts with CR had longer PFS than pts with PR or SD. However, pts with both PR and SD had prolonged OS, unlike pts with PD, which may suggest that clinical benefit duration is not well predicted by conventional response criteria. Nivo continued to be well tolerated, with no new safety signals. Characteristics of long-term responders will be presented. Study support: BMS. Medical writing: A Gill, Caudex, funded by BMS Figure. Figure. Disclosures Armand: Infinity: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Adaptive: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding. Younes:Celgene: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Zinzani:PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Collins:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Ramchandren:Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cohen:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Boer:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EISA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuruvilla:Lundbeck: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Trněný:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding; Sandoz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory board. Shipp:Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sacchi:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sumbul:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Ansell:Trillium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.