Search

Simple Summary: The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is still controversial. In this systematic review, we sought to investigate the safety and the postoperative and long-term outcomes of this technique. MIS for PHC is feasible, with safe postoperative and oncological outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these results, especially in the long term, since the evidence is still limited. Surgery and postoperative systemic chemotherapy represent the standard treatment for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) for hepatobiliary procedures has spread worldwide in the last two decades. Since resections for PHC are technically demanding, the role of MIS in this field is yet to be established. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC, to evaluate its safety and its surgical and oncological outcomes. A systematic literature review on PubMed and SCOPUS was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Overall, a total of 18 studies reporting 372 MIS procedures for PHC were included in our analysis. A progressive increase in the available literature was observed over the years. A total of 310 laparoscopic and 62 robotic resections were performed. A pooled analysis showed an operative time ranging from 205.3 ± 23.9 and 840 (770–890) minutes, and intraoperative bleeding between 101.1 ± 13.6 and 1360 ± 809 mL. Minor and major morbidity rates were 43.9% and 12.7%, respectively, with a 5.6% mortality rate. R0 resections were achieved in 80.6% of patients and the number of retrieved lymph nodes ranged between 4 (3–12) and 12 (8–16). This systematic review shows that MIS for PHC is feasible, with safe postoperative and oncological outcomes. Recent data has shown encouraging results and more reports are being published. Future studies should address differences between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Given the management and technical challenges, MIS for PHC should be performed by experienced surgeons, in high-volume centers, on selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uterine leiomyomas represent the gynecological neoplasm with the highest prevalence worldwide. This apparently benign pathological entity may permeate into the venous system causing the so-called intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus (IVL). IVL may seldom extend to large caliber veins and reach the right cardiac chambers or pulmonary arteries and cause signs of right sided congestive heart failure and sudden death. Due to its low incidence, however, IVL with intracardiac extension is often misdiagnosed resulting in deferred treatment. No consensus has been obtained regarding the standard surgical approach to be used for this rare condition. We describe the case of a massive pelvic recurrence of uterine leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension and provide a review of the literature, analyzing management and surgical outcomes.Case Presentation: We present the case of a 46-year-old premenopausal woman presenting with lower-extremity edema, recurrent syncopes and a history of subtotal hysterectomy for multiple uterine fibroids. She was diagnosed with pelvic recurrence of uterine leiomyomatosis and IVL with cardiac involvement. A two-stage surgical excision of the intracardiac-intracaval mass and pelvic leiomyomatosis was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and no evidence of recurrence was observed on follow-up.Conclusions: By virtue of the rarity of the present pathology, awareness is widely scarce and diagnosis is often delayed. Early recognition is difficult due to initial aspecific and subtle clinical manifestations. Nevertheless, suspicion should be held high in premenopausal women with known history of uterine leiomyomata, presenting with cardiovascular symptoms and evidence of a free-floating mass within the right cardiac chambers. In-depth imaging is crucial for defining its anatomical origin and relations. Prompt surgical treatment with radical excision of pelvic and intravenous leiomyomatosis guarantees favorable outcomes and excellent prognosis with low rates of recurrence, whereas delayed diagnosis and treatment exposes to increased risk of congestive heart failure and sudden death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an effective treatment to control tumor growth and improve survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The role of TARE in downstaging patients to liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the downstaging efficacy of TARE for intermediate and advanced HCC., Methods: Intention-to-treat analysis with multistate modeling was performed. Patients moved through 5 health states: (1) from TARE to listing, (2) from TARE to death without listing, (3) from listing to LT, (4) from listing to death without LT, and (5) from transplant to death. Factors affecting the chance of death after TARE were considered to stratify outcomes., Results: Two hundred fourteen patients underwent TARE. Of those, 43.9% had radiological response, 29.9% were listed, and 22.8% were transplanted. The probability of being alive without LT was 40.5% 1 y after TARE and 11.5% at 5 y. The chance of being listed was 9.4% at 1 y and 0.9% at 5 y. The probability of dying after TARE without LT was 38% at 1 y and 73% at 5 y. The overall survival of patients receiving LT was 61% at 5 y after transplant. Tumor beyond up-to-seven criteria, alfafetoprotein >400 ng/mL, and albumin-bilirubin ≥2 were associated with death. Three risk groups were associated with different response, chances of being listed, and receiving LT. Median survival was 3 y for low-risk, 1.9 y for intermediate-risk, and 9 mo for high-risk patients (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In intermediate and advanced HCC, TARE allows for a 44% chance of response, 30% downstaging, and 23% probability of permitting LT. Patient's and tumor's characteristics allow for risk stratification and predict survival from TARE., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)