Search

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is endoscopist dependent, and colonoscopy quality improvement programs aim to improve efficacy. This study evaluated the clinical benefit and safety of using a computer-aided detection (CADe) device in colonoscopy procedures.This randomized study prospectively evaluated the use of a CADe device at 5 academic and community centers by US board-certified gastroenterologists (n = 22). Participants aged ≥40 scheduled for screening or surveillance (≥3 years) colonoscopy were included; exclusion criteria included incomplete procedure, diagnostic indication, inflammatory bowel disease, and familial adenomatous polyposis. Patients were randomized by endoscopist to the standard or CADe colonoscopy arm using computer-generated, random-block method. The 2 primary endpoints were adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), the total number of adenomas resected divided by the total number of colonoscopies; and true histology rate (THR), the proportion of resections with clinically significant histology divided by the total number of polyp resections. The primary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach.Between January and September 2021, 1440 participants were enrolled to be randomized. After exclusion of participants who did not meet the eligibility criteria, 677 in the standard arm and 682 in the CADe arm were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. APC increased significantly with use of the CADe device (standard vs CADe: 0.83 vs 1.05, P = .002; total number of adenomas, 562 vs 719). There was no decrease in THR with use of the CADe device (standard vs CADe: 71.7% vs 67.4%, P for noninferiority.001; total number of non-neoplastic lesions, 284 vs 375). Adenoma detection rate was 43.9% and 47.8% in the standard and CADe arms, respectively (P = .065).For experienced endoscopists performing screening and surveillance colonoscopies in the United States, the CADe device statistically improved overall adenoma detection (APC) without a concomitant increase in resection of non-neoplastic lesions (THR).gov registration: NCT04754347.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by high risks of colonic and extracolonic tumors. Recent studies have suggested a rising risk for gastric cancer (GC). We sought to define the spectrum of premalignant gastric polyps in FAP, focusing on high-grade dysplasia (HGD).The gastric phenotypes of 118 patients diagnosed with FAP or attenuated FAP in our Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry were retrospectively reviewed. To analyze the clinical features associated with the diagnosis of HGD, we established an age- and sex-matched control group of FAP patients from our cohort without gastric HGD in a 4:1 ratio.The spectrum and frequency of gastric polyps in individuals with FAP included fundic gland polyps (67.9%), hyperplastic polyps/foveolar hyperplasia (19.6%), tubular adenomas (15.2%), foveolar adenomas (10.7%), and pyloric gland adenomas (6.3%). Ten patients (8.9%) exhibited gastric HGD at a mean age of 55 ± 13 years, and HGD was seen in all polyp types. When compared with control subjects, HGD was associated with a high diversity of gastric polyp histology, prior low-grade dysplasia, severe gastric polyposis, and prior Whipple surgery (P = 2.0E-5, .003, .024, and .04, respectively). Two patients (1.7%) with HGD were diagnosed with GC. However, the remaining 8 patients with HGD have been under surveillance for an average of 5.8 ± 4.5 years without progression to GC.Gastric HGD in FAP may be more common than previously appreciated. The natural history of HGD is variable, and most patients with HGD do not appear to progress to GC.