Search

Introduction: This study investigates the runtime and costs of biventricular defibrillators (CRT-D) and biventricular pacemakers (CRT-P). Accurate estimates of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device runtime across all manufactures are rare, especially for CRT-P.Methods: Health claims data of a large nationwide German health insurance was used to analyze CRT device runtime. We defined device runtime as the time between the date of implantation and the date of generator change or removal. The median costs for implantation, change, and removal of a CRT device were calculated accordingly.Results: In total, the data set comprises 17,826 patients. A total of 4,296 complete runtimes for CRT-D devices and 429 complete runtimes for CRT-P devices were observed. Median device runtime was for CRT-D devices and 8.16 years for CRT-P devices (log-rank test p

Background While the effectiveness of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as an intervention to impact patient pathways has been established for cancer care, it is unknown for other indications. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a PROM-based monitoring and alert intervention for early detection of critical recovery paths following hip and knee replacement. Methods and findings The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is based on a multicentre randomised controlled trial encompassing 3,697 patients with hip replacement and 3,110 patients with knee replacement enrolled from 2019 to 2020 in 9 German hospitals. The analysis was conducted with a subset of 546 hip and 492 knee replacement cases with longitudinal cost data from 24 statutory health insurances. Patients were randomised 1:1 to a PROM-based remote monitoring and alert intervention or to a standard care group. All patients were assessed at 12-months post-surgery via digitally collected PROMs. Patients within the intervention group were additionally assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-surgery to be contacted in case of critical recovery paths. For the effect evaluation, a PROM-based composite measure (PRO-CM) was developed, combining changes across various PROMs in a single index ranging from 0 to 100. The PRO-CM included 6 PROMs focused on quality of life and various aspects of physical and mental health. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The intervention group showed incremental outcomes of 2.54 units PRO-CM (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.93, 4.14]; p = 0.002) for patients with hip and 0.87 (95% CI [-0.94, 2.67]; p = 0.347) for patients with knee replacement. Within the 12-months post-surgery period the intervention group had less costs of 376.43[euro] (95% CI [-639.74, -113.12]; p = 0.005) in patients with hip, and 375.50[euro] (95% CI [-767.40, 16.39]; p = 0.060) in patients with knee replacement, revealing a dominant ICER for both procedures. However, it remains unclear which step of the multistage intervention contributes most to the positive effect. Conclusions The intervention significantly improved patient outcomes at lower costs in patients with hip replacements when compared with standard care. Further it showed a nonsignificant cost reduction in knee replacement patients. This reinforces the notion that PROMs can be utilised as a cost-effective instrument for remote monitoring in standard care settings. Trial registration Registration: German Register for Clinical Studies (DRKS) under DRKS00019916., Author(s): Lukas Schöner 1,*, David Kuklinski 2,*, Laura Wittich 1, Viktoria Steinbeck 1, Benedikt Langenberger 1, Thorben Breitkreuz 3, Felix Compes 4, Mathias Kretzler 5, Ursula Marschall 6, Wolfgang Klauser [...]

Purpose Supporting the provision of intensive care medicine through telehealth potentially improves process quality. This may improve patient recovery and long-term outcomes. We investigated the effectiveness of a multifaceted telemedical programme on the adherence to German quality indicators (QIs) in a regional network of intensive care units (ICUs) in Germany. Methods We conducted an investigator-initiated, large-scale, open-label, stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial enrolling adult ICU patients with an expected ICU stay of [greater than or equal to] 24 h. Twelve ICU clusters in Berlin and Brandenburg were randomly assigned to three sequence groups to transition from control (standard care) to the intervention condition (telemedicine). The quality improvement intervention consisted of daily telemedical rounds guided by eight German acute ICU care QIs and expert consultations. Co-primary effectiveness outcomes were patient-specific daily adherence (fulfilled yes/no) to QIs, assessed by a central end point adjudication committee. Analyses used mixed-effects logistic modelling adjusted for time. This study is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03671447). Results Between September 4, 2018, and March 31, 2020, 1463 patients (414 treated on control, 1049 on intervention condition) were enrolled at ten clusters, resulting in 14,783 evaluated days. Two randomised clusters recruited no patients (one withdrew informed consent; one dropped out). The intervention, as implemented, significantly increased QI performance for 'sedation, analgesia and delirium' (adjusted odds ratio (99.375% confidence interval [CI]) 5.328, 3.395-8.358), 'ventilation' (OR 2.248, 1.198-4.217), 'weaning from ventilation' (OR 9.049, 2.707-30.247), 'infection management' (OR 4.397, 1.482-13.037), 'enteral nutrition' (OR 1.579, 1.032-2.416), 'patient and family communication' (OR 6.787, 3.976-11.589), and 'early mobilisation' (OR 3.161, 2.160-4.624). No evidence for a difference in adherence to 'daily multi-professional and interdisciplinary clinical visits' between both conditions was found (OR 1.606, 0.780-3.309). Temporal trends related and unrelated to the intervention were detected. 149 patients died during their index ICU stay (45 treated on control, 104 on intervention condition). Conclusion A telemedical quality improvement program increased adherence to seven evidence-based German performance indicators in acute ICU care. These results need further confirmation in a broader setting of regional, non-academic community hospitals and other healthcare systems., Author(s): Claudia D. Spies [sup.1], Nicolas Paul [sup.1], Christine Adrion [sup.2], Elke Berger [sup.3], Reinhard Busse [sup.3], Ben Kraufmann [sup.4], Ursula Marschall [sup.5], Simone Rosseau [sup.6], Claudia Denke [sup.1], Henning [...]

Background: Vitamin‐K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non‐VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer‐acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials. Methods: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation‐naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding. Results: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching‐cohort (PSM‐cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM‐cohort, 5‐year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un‐weighted and three different weighted Fine–Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort. Conclusions: In this large real‐world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The outcome data and predictors for mortality among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) affected by COVID-19 are limited. A more detailed understanding may aid in implementing targeted prevention measures in potential future pandemic events. Methods: Based on nationwide administrative health insurance data, all the recorded in-hospital cases of patients with CHD with COVID-19 in 2020 were analyzed. The demographics, treatment details, as well as 30-day mortality rate were assessed. The associations of the patients' characteristics with death were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 403 patients with CHD were treated in- hospital for COVID-19 in 2020. Of these, 338 patients presented with virus detection but no pneumonia whilst, 65 patients suffered from associated pneumonia. The cohort of patients with pneumonia was older (p = 0.04) and presented with more cardiovascular comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (p = 0.08), although this parameter did not reach a statistically significant difference. The 30-day mortality rate was associated with highly complex CHD (odds ratio (OR) 7.81, p = 0.04) and advanced age (OR 2.99 per 10 years, p = 0.03). No child died of COVID-related pneumonia in our dataset. Conclusions: COVID-19 infection with associated pneumonia chiefly affected the older patients with CHD. Age and the complexity of CHD were identified as additional predictors of mortality. These aspects might be helpful to retrospectively audit the recommendations and guide health politics during future pandemic events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opioids are highly effective drugs but need close monitoring to avoid harm to patients. The aim of this study was to analyze how guideline recommendations are met for (i) the avoidance of the concomitant use of anxiolytics, hypnotics, or sedatives; (ii) the prescribing of laxatives in long-term opioid treatment; (iii) the co-prescribing of drugs to control the emetic effect of opioids; (iv) pretreatment with non-opioids; and (v) screening for depression when initiating opioids. The results are based on a routine data analysis of a large German health insurance fund. Different study populations of noncancer patients (18+ years old) treated with opioids were analyzed: 10.4% of the opioid recipients in 2021 received at least one concomitant prescription with anxiolytics, hypnotics, or sedatives; 69.3% of those with long-term opioid treatment received at least one laxative prescription. Of those with first-time opioid prescriptions, 4.8% received an antiemetic drug; 47.3% of those with a newly initiated opioid therapy received a non-opioid prescription within three months before the start of the opioid therapy; and 22.0% of patients with incident opioid prescription had at least one documentation of a depression diagnosis within three months of the first prescription. There is an urgent need to improve opioid prescribing to avoid risky combinations and adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]