Search

Recent studies have indicated uncertainty about the performance limit states of seismically isolated buildings in very large earthquakes, especially if the isolator displacement demands exceed the seismic gap and induce pounding. Previous research has shown the benefit of providing phased supplemental damping that does not affect the isolation system response in a design event. A phased passive control device, or gap damper, was designed, fabricated, and experimentally evaluated during shake table testing of a quarter scale base-isolated three-story steel frame building. Identical input motions were applied to system configurations without a gap damper and with a gap damper, to directly assess the influence of the gap damper on displacement and acceleration demands. The gap damper was observed to reduce displacement demands by up to 15% relative to the isolated system without the gap damper. Superstructure floor accelerations increased substantially because of damper activation, but were limited to a peak of about 1.18 g. The gap damper reduces displacement most effectively if the ground motion contains one or more of the following characteristics: the spectral displacement increases with increasing period near the effective period of the isolation system, the motion is dominated by a single large pulse rather than multiple cycles at a consistent intensity, and the motion has a dominant component aligned with a major axis of the structure. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY Base isolation systems generally perform well under design-level ground motions to reduce both interstory drift and acceleration demands. During a maximum considered earthquake, however, large displacements in the base level may cause pounding between the structure and perimeter moat wall, which can lead to very high acceleration in the superstructure. A phased passive control device, or 'gap damper', has been conceived to control base isolator displacement during extreme events while having no effect on the isolation system performance for earthquakes up to design level. It is by introducing an appropriate initial gap that the device triggers additional energy dissipation during large earthquakes to limit displacements. Various combinations of hysteretic and viscous damping mechanisms are utilized to provide desired additional energy dissipation. A numerical study that assesses the ability of various gap damper models to reduce the base displacement by at least 25% while limiting the acceleration increase at the roof level that results from the sudden engagement of a damping device is devised. The energy dissipation level provided by the damper is optimized to provide the best possible performance. For base isolation systems with effective periods of isolation in the 2.5-3.0 s range, gap damper models incorporating a viscous dashpot are very effective in controlling displacement, whereas gap dampers restricted to a hysteretic damping mechanism are ineffective. The gap damper is less effective for systems with longer periods of isolation (3.5-4.0 s) because the lower target acceleration in this range is more difficult to meet. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SUMMARY The concept of the hybrid passive control system is studied analytically by investigating the seismic response of steel frame structures. Hybrid control systems consist of two different passive elements combined into a single device or system. The hybrid systems investigated in this research consist of a rate-dependent damping device paired with a rate-independent energy dissipation element. The innovative configurations exploit individual element strengths and offset their weaknesses through multiphased behavior. A nine-story, five-bay steel moment-frame was used for the analysis. Six different seismic resisting systems were analyzed and compared. The conventional systems included a special moment-resisting frame (SMRF) and a dual SMRF-buckling-restrained brace (BRB) system. The final four configurations are hybrid passive systems. The different hybrid configurations utilize a BRB and either a high-damping rubber damper or viscous fluid damper. The analyses were run in the form of an incremental dynamic analysis. Several damage measures were calculated, including maximum roof drift, base shear, and total roof acceleration. The results demonstrate the capability of hybrid passive control systems to improve structural response compared with conventional lateral systems and to be effective for performance-based seismic design. Each hybrid configuration improved some aspect of structural response with some providing benefits for multiple damage measures. The multiphased nature provides improved response for frequent and severe seismic events. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]