Search

Objectives: Acute anterior uveitis ('uveitis') is a common axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) extramusculoskeletal manifestation. Interleukin (IL)-17 is implicated in its pathogenesis, however, there is conflicting evidence for IL-17A inhibition in uveitis management. We report pooled analyses of uveitis incidence in patients receiving bimekizumab (BKZ), a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, from phase 2b/3 trials., Methods: Data were pooled for patients receiving BKZ 160 mg or placebo in the double-blind treatment period of the phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 (NCT03928704; non-radiographic axSpA) and BE MOBILE 2 (NCT03928743; radiographic axSpA) trials. Data were separately pooled for patients treated with at least one BKZ dose in the BE MOBILE trials and their ongoing open-label extension (OLE; NCT04436640), and the phase 2b BE AGILE trial (NCT02963506; radiographic axSpA) and its ongoing OLE (NCT03355573). Uveitis rates and exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR)/100 patient-years (PYs) are reported., Results: In the BE MOBILE 1 and 2 double-blind treatment period, 0.6% (2/349) of patients receiving BKZ experienced uveitis vs 4.6% (11/237) receiving placebo (nominal p=0.001; EAIR (95% CI): 1.8/100 PYs (0.2 to 6.7) vs 15.4/100 PYs (95% CI 7.7 to 27.5)). In patients with history of uveitis, EAIR was lower in patients receiving BKZ (6.2/100 PYs (95% CI 0.2 to 34.8); 1.9%) vs placebo (70.4/100 PYs (95% CI 32.2 to 133.7); 20.0%; nominal p=0.004). In the phase 2b/3 pool (N=848; BKZ exposure: 2034.4 PYs), EAIR remained low (1.2/100 PYs (95% CI 0.8 to 1.8))., Conclusions: Bimekizumab, a dual-IL-17A/F inhibitor, may confer protective effects for uveitis in patients with axSpA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MAB: Grant/research support from UCB Pharma; consultant for Clementia, Grey Wolf Therapeutics, Incyte, Ipsen, Pfizer, Regeneron and Xinthera; speaker for Novartis and Pfizer; payment for expert testimony from Ipsen; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Incyte, Ipsen and Regeneron. MR: Speakers bureau from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; consultant of AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB Pharma. FAvG: Grants from Jacobus Stichting, Novartis, Stichting ASAS, Stichting Vrienden van Sole Mio and UCB Pharma; consultant for AbbVie, ASAS, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. NH: Consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. LSG: Consultant for Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; grant/research support from Novartis and UCB Pharma paid to institution; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Acelyrin; member of the Spondylitis Association of America Medical Scientific Advisory Board and ASAS Executive Committee. CF, KW: Employee and shareholder of UCB Pharma. AM, UM, TV, NdP: Employees of UCB Pharma. AD: Speaker for Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; consultant for BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; grant/research support from BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; member of the steering committee of GRAPPA. IvdH-B: Consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis and UCB Pharma; unrestricted grants received for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; fees received for Lectures from AbbVie, BMS, MSD and Pfizer., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Background: Various volumes of bowel preparation are used in clinical practice. There is conflicting data on the effectiveness of individual regimens. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and compliance of currently used bowel preparations with the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) performance measures using data of the Dutch nationwide colorectal cancer screening (CRC) program., Methods: In a prospective, multicenter endoscopy database, we identified all CRC screening colonoscopies performed in 15 Dutch endoscopy centers from 2016 to 2020. We excluded procedures without documented bowel preparation or the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score. Bowel preparation regimens were categorized into three groups, that is, 4-L (polyethylene glycol (PEG)), 2-L (2-L PEG with ascorbic acid) and ≤1-L volumes (sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, 1L-PEG with sodium sulfate and ascorbic acid or oral sulfate solution). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performance measures included adequate BBPS score (≥6) (>90%), cecal intubation rate (CIR, >90%), adenoma detection rate (ADR, >25%) and polyp detection rate (PDR, >40%). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for adequate BBPS and patient discomfort., Results: A total of 39,042 CRC screening colonoscopies were included. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores, CIR, ADR and PDR for 4L, 2L and ≤1L regimens all met the minimum ESGE performance measures standards. However, an adequate BBPS score was more frequently seen with 2L regimens (98.0%) as compared to 4L (97.1%) and ≤1L regimens (97.0%) (p < 0.001), respectively. In addition, CIR was higher for ≤1L (98.4%) versus 4L (97.7%) and 2L (97.9%) regimens (p = 0.001), ADR higher for lower volume (≤1L (60.0%) and 2L (61.2)) versus higher volume (4L (58.6%)) regimens (p < 0.001), and PDR higher for ≤1L (70.0%) and 2L (70.8%) versus 4L (67.2%) regimens (p < 0.001). Boston Bowel Preparation Scale for ≤1L regimens was higher when combined with bisacodyl (97.3%) than without (95.6%) (p < 0.001). Overall, bisacodyl use was independently associated with higher patient discomfort (odds ratios = 1.47, confidence intervals = 1.26-1.72)., Conclusions: Despite variations in bowel preparation volumes, all regimens meet the minimum ESGE performance measures for bowel preparation and other quality parameters. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale can be further improved if ultra low volume regimens are combined with bisacodyl. The choice for either bowel preparation volume can therefore be based on volume-tolerance and patient preference., (© 2023 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)