29 results on '"Martinez-Vila, C."'
Search Results
2. Delayed immune-related adverse events with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in melanoma
- Author
-
Owen, C.N., Bai, X., Quah, T., Lo, S.N., Allayous, C., Callaghan, S., Martínez-Vila, C., Wallace, R., Bhave, P., Reijers, I.L.M., Thompson, N., Vanella, V., Gerard, C.L., Aspeslagh, S., Labianca, A., Khattak, A., Mandala, M., Xu, W., Neyns, B., Michielin, O., Blank, C.U., Welsh, S.J., Haydon, A., Sandhu, S., Mangana, J., McQuade, J.L., Ascierto, P.A., Zimmer, L., Johnson, D.B., Arance, A., Lorigan, P., Lebbé, C., Carlino, M.S., Sullivan, R.J., Long, G.V., and Menzies, A.M.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant outbreak among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer in Europe: results from the retrospective, multicentre, OnCovid registry study
- Author
-
Pinato, DJ, Aguilar-Company, J, Ferrante, D, Hanbury, G, Bower, M, Salazar, R, Mirallas, O, Sureda, A, Plaja, A, Cucurull, M, Mesia, R, Townsend, S, Jackson, A, Dalla Pria, A, Newsom-Davis, T, Handford, J, Sita-Lumsden, A, Apthorp, E, Vincenzi, B, Bertuzzi, A, Brunet, J, Lambertini, M, Maluquer, C, Pedrazzoli, P, Biello, F, Sinclair, A, Bawany, S, Khalique, S, Rossi, S, Rogers, L, Murphy, C, Belessiotis, K, Carmona-Garcia, MC, Sharkey, R, Garcia-Illescas, D, Rizzo, G, Perachino, M, Saoudi-Gonzalez, N, Doonga, K, Fox, L, Roldan, E, Gaidano, G, Ruiz-Camps, I, Bruna, R, Patriarca, A, Martinez-Vila, C, Cantini, L, Zambelli, A, Giusti, R, Mazzoni, F, Caliman, E, Santoro, A, Grosso, F, Parisi, A, Queirolo, P, Aujayeb, A, Rimassa, L, Prat, A, Tucci, M, Libertini, M, Grisanti, S, Mukherjee, U, Diamantis, N, Fusco, V, Generali, D, Provenzano, S, Gennari, A, Tabernero, J, and Cortellini, A
- Abstract
Background The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible and escapes vaccine-induced immunity. We aimed to describe outcomes due to COVID-19 during the omicron outbreak compared with the prevaccination period and alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) waves in patients with cancer in Europe. Methods In this retrospective analysis of the multicentre OnCovid Registry study, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, who had a history of solid or haematological malignancy that was either active or in remission. Patient were recruited from 37 oncology centres from UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany. Participants were followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death or loss to follow-up, while being treated as per standard of care. For this analysis, we excluded data from centres that did not actively enter new data after March 1, 2021 (in France, Germany, and Belgium). We compared measures of COVID-19 morbidity, which were complications from COVID-19, hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and requirement of supplemental oxygen and COVID-19-specific therapies, and COVID-19 mortality across three time periods designated as the prevaccination (Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020), alpha-delta (Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021), and omicron (Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022) phases. We assessed all-cause case-fatality rates at 14 days and 28 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 overall and in unvaccinated and fully vaccinated patients and in those who received a booster dose, after adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour type, stage, and status, and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974, and is ongoing. Findings As of Feb 4, 2022 (database lock), the registry included 3820 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 between Feb 27, 2020, and Jan 31, 2022. 3473 patients were eligible for inclusion (1640 [47.4%] were women and 1822 [52.6%] were men, with a median age of 68 years [IQR 57-77]). 2033 (58.5%) of 3473 were diagnosed during the prevaccination phase, 1075 (31.0%) during the alpha-delta phase, and 365 (10.5%) during the omicron phase. Among patients diagnosed during the omicron phase, 113 (33.3%) of 339 were fully vaccinated and 165 (48.7%) were boosted, whereas among those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase, 152 (16.6%) of 915 were fully vaccinated and 21 (2.3%) were boosted. Compared with patients diagnosed during the prevaccination period, those who were diagnosed during the omicron phase had lower case-fatality rates at 14 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.32 [95% CI 0.19-0.61) and 28 days (0.34 [0.16-0.79]), complications due to COVID-19 (0.26 [0.17-0.46]), and hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (0.17 [0.09-0.32]), and had less requirements for COVID-19-specific therapy (0.22 [0.15-0.34]) and oxygen therapy (0.24 [0.14-0.43]) than did those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. Unvaccinated patients diagnosed during the omicron phase had similar crude case-fatality rates at 14 days (ten [25%] of 40 patients vs 114 [17%] of 656) and at 28 days (11 [27%] of 40 vs 184 [28%] of 656) and similar rates of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (18 [43%] of 42 vs 266 [41%] of 652) and complications from COVID-19 (13 [31%] of 42 vs 237 [36%] of 659) as those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. Interpretation Despite time-dependent improvements in outcomes reported in the omicron phase compared with the earlier phases of the pandemic, patients with cancer remain highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 if they are not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Our findings support universal vaccination of patients with cancer as a protective measure against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. Copyright (C) 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2022
4. P-274 Exploratory analysis of potential clinical, molecular and analytical prognostic factors of real-world patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single center study
- Author
-
Perez Criado, I., primary, Matas Garcia, M., additional, Delany Tijera, M., additional, Martinez Vila, C., additional, Cillan Narvaez, E., additional, and Casado Gonzalez, E., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. 2220P MOLTHY project (TTCC-2020-02): A Spanish observational study for MOLecular characterization of THYroid carcinoma
- Author
-
Baste Rotllan, N., Hernando, J., Martínez Trufero, J., Plana Serrahima, M., Rubió-Casadevall, J., Álvarez-Escolá, C., Gallardo, E., Martinez-Vila, C., López López, C., Alonso-Gordoa, T., Segura Huerta, Á.A., Cunquero Tomás, A.J., García-Álvarez, A., Ortega Izquierdo, E., Oliva, M., Teixido, C., Sanfeliu Torres, E., Durán, M., Montalbán, C., and Mesia, R.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. 900P COVID-19 in patients with head and neck cancers (HERODOTUS): An international, registry-based, cohort study
- Author
-
Psyrri, A., Kyprianou, M., Cavalieri, S., Oliva Bernal, M., Rogado, J., Pena, C., Iglesias, L., Baste Rotllan, N., Castelo, B., Fountzilas, G., Martinez-Vila, C., Cucurull Salamero, M., Triaridis, S., Diaz de Corcuera Frutos, I., Unal, E., Chua, M.L.K., H. hamid, Saba, N.F., Mesia Nin, R., and Licitra, L.F.L.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Complete response (CR) to anthracycline-based chemotherapy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated preoperatively with anthracycline and taxane-based regimens
- Author
-
Marin Alcala, M., primary, Llort Pursals, G., additional, Del Riego Ferrari, J.H., additional, Giner, J., additional, Andreu Navarro, F.X., additional, Medina, S., additional, Aparicio, O., additional, Dalmau Portulas, E., additional, Ribera Fernandez, P., additional, Oliveres, H., additional, Martinez Vila, C., additional, Cabrera Romero, J.M., additional, Segui Palmer, M.A., additional, and Fernandez Morales, L.A., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. 1138P Delayed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on anti-PD1-based therapy
- Author
-
Owen, C.N., Bai, X., Quah, T., Lo, S., Callaghan, S., Martínez-Vila, C., Bhave, P., Reijers, I., Gerard, C.L., Aspelagh, S., Xu, W., Welsh, S.J., Sandhu, S., Mangana, J., McQuade, J.L., Ascierto, P.A., Zimmer, L., Johnson, D.B., Lebbé, C., and Menzies, A.M.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. 1106P International experience of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma
- Author
-
Serra-Bellver, P., Versluis, J.M., Oberoi, H.K., Slattery, T.D., Khan, Y., Patrinelly, J.R., Pires da Silva, I., Martínez-Vila, C., Cook, N., Graham, D.M., Zhou, C., Gupta, A., Fernandez, A.M. Arance, Johnson, D.B., Long, G.V., Pickering, L., Larkin, J., Blank, C.U., and Lorigan, P.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Fulvestrant plus LHRH analogues in male with synchronous breast and prostate cancer
- Author
-
Martinez Vila, C., primary, Fernández-Morales, L.A., additional, Oliveres, H., additional, Marín, M., additional, Ribera, P., additional, Pardo, J.C., additional, Dalmau, E., additional, and Segui, M.A., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. 230P - Complete response (CR) to anthracycline-based chemotherapy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated preoperatively with anthracycline and taxane-based regimens
- Author
-
Marin Alcala, M., Llort Pursals, G., Del Riego Ferrari, J.H., Giner, J., Andreu Navarro, F.X., Medina, S., Aparicio, O., Dalmau Portulas, E., Ribera Fernandez, P., Oliveres, H., Martinez Vila, C., Cabrera Romero, J.M., Segui Palmer, M.A., and Fernandez Morales, L.A.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a subanalysis of the OnCovid registry
- Author
-
Laia Garrigós, Cristina Saura, Clara Martinez-Vila, Alberto Zambelli, Mark Bower, Barbara Pistilli, Matteo Lambertini, Diego Ottaviani, Nikolaos Diamantis, Ailsa Lumsden, Sonia Pernas, Daniele Generali, Elia Seguí, Gemma Viñas, Eudald Felip, Ana Sanchez, Gianpiero Rizzo, Armando Santoro, Alessio Cortellini, Ylenia Perone, John Chester, Maria Iglesias, Marta Betti, Bruno Vincenzi, Michela Libertini, Francesca Mazzoni, Federica Zoratto, Rossana Berardi, Annalisa Guida, Rachel Wuerstlein, Angela Loizidou, Rachel Sharkey, Juan Aguilar Company, Marta Matas, Chiara Saggia, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Emeline Colomba-Blameble, Myria Galazi, Uma Mukherjee, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Mar Marin, Carla Strina, Aleix Prat, Helena Pla, Eva Maria Ciruelos, Alexia Bertuzzi, Lucia del Mastro, Giampiero Porzio, Thomas Newsom-Davis, Isabel Ruiz, Maria Belen Delany, Marco Krengli, Vittoria Fotia, Alessandro Viansone, Neha Chopra, Margarita Romeo, Ramon Salazar, Ignacio Perez, Francesca d’Avanzo, Michela Franchi, Manuela Milani, Fanny Pommeret, Marco Tucci, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Nadia Harbeck, Daniela Ferrante, David J. Pinato, Alessandra Gennari, Garrigos, L., Saura, C., Martinez-Vila, C., Zambelli, A., Bower, M., Pistilli, B., Lambertini, M., Ottaviani, D., Diamantis, N., Lumsden, A., Pernas, S., Generali, D., Segui, E., Vinas, G., Felip, E., Sanchez, A., Rizzo, G., Santoro, A., Cortellini, A., Perone, Y., Chester, J., Iglesias, M., Betti, M., Vincenzi, B., Libertini, M., Mazzoni, F., Zoratto, F., Berardi, R., Guida, A., Wuerstlein, R., Loizidou, A., Sharkey, R., Aguilar Company, J., Matas, M., Saggia, C., Chiudinelli, L., Colomba-Blameble, E., Galazi, M., Mukherjee, U., Van Hemelrijck, M., Marin, M., Strina, C., Prat, A., Pla, H., Ciruelos, E. M., Bertuzzi, A., del Mastro, L., Porzio, G., Newsom-Davis, T., Ruiz, I., Delany, M. B., Krengli, M., Fotia, V., Viansone, A., Chopra, N., Romeo, M., Salazar, R., Perez, I., D'Avanzo, F., Franchi, M., Milani, M., Pommeret, F., Tucci, M., Pedrazzoli, P., Harbeck, N., Ferrante, D., Pinato, D. J., Gennari, A., Institut Català de la Salut, [Garrigós L] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Saura C] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Head Breast Cancer Unit, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Martinez-Vila C] Department of Oncology, Hospital Althaia Manresa, Barcelona, Spain. [Zambelli A] Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy. [Bower M] Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. [Pistilli B] Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France. [Aguilar Company J] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica i Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Ruiz I] Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. [Pla H] Departament d'Oncologia Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), Girona, Spain, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Outcome assessment (Medical care) ,breast cancer ,COVID-19 ,COVID-19 outcomes ,OnCovid ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Breast Neoplasms [DISEASES] ,Population ,Context (language use) ,COVID-19 (Malaltia) - Mortalitat ,Disease ,técnicas de investigación::métodos epidemiológicos::recopilación de datos::estadísticas vitales::mortalidad [TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS] ,Càncer de mama ,Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/complicaciones [Otros calificadores] ,Breast cancer ,Mama - Càncer ,Internal medicine ,virosis::infecciones por virus ARN::infecciones por Nidovirales::infecciones por Coronaviridae::infecciones por Coronavirus [ENFERMEDADES] ,Medicine ,education ,COVID-19 outcome ,RC254-282 ,COVID-19 (Malaltia) - Complicacions ,Original Research ,education.field_of_study ,neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de la mama [ENFERMEDADES] ,business.industry ,Mortality rate ,Cancer ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Virus Diseases::RNA Virus Infections::Nidovirales Infections::Coronaviridae Infections::Coronavirus Infections [DISEASES] ,medicine.disease ,Comorbidity ,Oncology ,Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Data Collection::Vital Statistics::Mortality [ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT] ,Avaluació de resultats (Assistència mèdica) ,business ,Complication ,Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/complications [Other subheadings] - Abstract
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Cáncer de mama COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Càncer de mama COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Breast cancer Background: Cancer patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and mortality than the rest of the population. Breast cancer patients seem to have better prognosis when infected by SARS-CoV-2 than other cancer patients. Methods: We report a subanalysis of the OnCovid study providing more detailed information in the breast cancer population. Results: We included 495 breast cancer patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 62.6 years; 31.5% presented more than one comorbidity. The most frequent breast cancer subtype was luminal-like (n = 245, 49.5%) and 177 (35.8%) had metastatic disease. A total of 332 (67.1%) patients were receiving active treatment, with radical intent in 232 (47.6%) of them. Hospitalization rate was 58.2% and all-cause mortality rate was 20.3%. One hundred twenty-nine (26.1%) patients developed one COVID-19 complication, being acute respiratory failure the most common (n = 74, 15.0%). In the multivariable analysis, age older than 70 years, presence of COVID-19 complications, and metastatic disease were factors correlated with worse outcomes, while ongoing anticancer therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis appeared to be a protective factor. No particular oncological treatment was related to higher risk of complications. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73 (18.3%) patients had some kind of modification on their oncologic treatment. At the first oncological reassessment (median time: 46.9 days ± 36.7), 255 (51.6%) patients reported to be fully recovered from the infection. There were 39 patients (7.9%) with long-term SARS-CoV-2-related complications. Conclusion: In the context of COVID-19, our data confirm that breast cancer patients appear to have lower complications and mortality rate than expected in other cancer populations. Most breast cancer patients can be safely treated for their neoplasm during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological treatment has no impact on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 complications, and, especially in the curative setting, the treatment should be modified as little as possible. D.J. Pinato is supported by grant funding from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416) and acknowledges grant support from the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust (CTRT), infrastructural and grant support by the Cancer Research UK Imperial Centre and the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. A. Gennari is supported by the AIRC IG Grant, No. 14230, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Foundation, Milan, Italy and acknowledge also support from the UPO Aging Project.
- Published
- 2021
13. Time-Dependent COVID-19 Mortality in Patients With Cancer: An Updated Analysis of the OnCovid Registry
- Author
-
Gianpiero Rizzo, Eudald Felip, Annalisa Guida, Alessio Cortellini, Francesca Mazzoni, Rachel Sharkey, Alice Baggi, Emeline Colomba, Sabrina Rossi, Salvatore Grisanti, Federica Zoratto, David J. Pinato, Daniela Ferrante, Claudia Andrea Cruz, Giampero Porzio, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Alessandra Gennari, Alexia Bertuzzi, Gianluca Gaidano, Joan Brunet, Johann Colomba, Alessia Dalla Pria, Nadia Harbeck, Raffaele Giusti, Alberto Zambelli, Angela Loizidou, Clara Martinez-Vila, Daniele Generali, Matteo Lambertini, Isabel Ruiz-Camps, Paola Queirolo, Michela Libertini, Ana Sanchez de Torre, Ailsa Sita-Lumsden, Laura Fox, Federica Biello, Javier Marco-Hernández, Nikolaos Diamantis, Elia Seguí, Lorenza Rimassa, Nadia Saoudi-Gonzalez, Ariadna Roqué Lloveras, Armando Santoro, John D. Chester, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Carlo Tondini, Marco Krengli, Saoirse Dolly, Raquel Liñan, Elisa Roldán, Charlotte Moss, Diego Ottaviani, Fanny Pommeret, Uma Mukherjee, Andrea Patriarca, Aleix Prat, Joanne Evans, Rossana Berardi, Meera Patel, Mark Bower, Marco Tagliamento, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Juan Aguilar-Company, Lorenza Scotti, Bruno Vincenzi, Irina Earnshaw, M Carmen Carmona-García, Anna Pous, Thomas Newsom-Davis, Riccardo Bruna, Krishnie Srikandarajah, Rossella Bertulli, Josep Tabernero, Vittoria Fotia, Alessandro Parisi, Anna Sureda, Ramon Salazar, Beth Russell, Michela Franchi, Roxana Reyes, Pinato, D. J., Patel, M., Scotti, L., Colomba, E., Dolly, S., Loizidou, A., Chester, J., Mukherjee, U., Zambelli, A., Dalla Pria, A., Aguilar-Company, J., Bower, M., Salazar, R., Bertuzzi, A., Brunet, J., Lambertini, M., Tagliamento, M., Pous, A., Sita-Lumsden, A., Srikandarajah, K., Colomba, J., Pommeret, F., Segui, E., Generali, D., Grisanti, S., Pedrazzoli, P., Rizzo, G., Libertini, M., Moss, C., Evans, J. S., Russell, B., Harbeck, N., Vincenzi, B., Biello, F., Bertulli, R., Ottaviani, D., Linan, R., Rossi, S., Carmona-Garcia, M. C., Tondini, C., Fox, L., Baggi, A., Fotia, V., Parisi, A., Porzio, G., Queirolo, P., Cruz, C. A., Saoudi-Gonzalez, N., Felip, E., Roque Lloveras, A., Newsom-Davis, T., Sharkey, R., Roldan, E., Reyes, R., Zoratto, F., Earnshaw, I., Ferrante, D., Marco-Hernandez, J., Ruiz-Camps, I., Gaidano, G., Patriarca, A., Bruna, R., Sureda, A., Martinez-Vila, C., Sanchez De Torre, A., Berardi, R., Giusti, R., Mazzoni, F., Guida, A., Rimassa, L., Chiudinelli, L., Franchi, M., Krengli, M., Santoro, A., Prat, A., Tabernero, J., Van Hemelrijck, M., Diamantis, N., Gennari, A., and Cortellini, A.
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,solid cancer ,Internal medicine ,Neoplasms ,Tumor stage ,COVID-19 ,real-world data ,hematologic cancer ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Registries ,Pandemics ,Aged ,Original Investigation ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Hazard ratio ,Outbreak ,Cancer ,Infant ,medicine.disease ,Female ,Oncology ,business ,Case series - Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with cancer have improved in terms of disease management and capacity is yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE To test whether severity and mortality from COVID-19 among patients with cancer have improved during the course of the pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS OnCovid is a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with solid or hematologic cancer and COVID-19. This multicenter case series study included real-world data from 35 institutions across 6 countries (UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany). This update included patients diagnosed between February 27, 2020, and February, 14, 2021. Inclusion criteria were confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a history of solid or hematologic cancer. EXPOSURES SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Deaths were differentiated at 14 days and 3 months as the 2 landmark end points. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by stratifying patients across 5 phases (February to March 2020, April to June 2020, July to September 2020, October to December 2020, and January to February 2021) and across 2 major outbreaks (February to June 2020 and July 2020 to February 2021). RESULTS At data cutoff, 2795 consecutive patients were included, with 2634 patients eligible for analysis (median [IQR] age, 68 [18-77] years ; 52.8% men). Eligible patients demonstrated significant time-dependent improvement in 14-day case-fatality rate (CFR) with estimates of 29.8% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33) for February to March 2020; 20.3% (95% CI, 0.17-0.23) for April to June 2020;12.5% (95% Cl, 0.06-22.90) for July to September 2020; 17.2% (95% CI, 0.15-0.21) for October to December 2020; and 14.5% (95% CI, 0.09-0.21) for January to February 2021(all P < .001) across the predefined phases. Compared with the second major outbreak, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak were more likely to be 65 years or older (974 of 1626 [60.3%] vs 564 of 1008 [56.1%]; P = .03), have at least 2 comorbidities (793 of 1626 [48.8%) vs 427 of 1008 [42.4%); P = .001), and have advanced tumors (708 of 1626 [46.4%) vs 536 of 1008 [56.1%]: P < .001). Complications of COVID-19 were more likely to be seen (738 of 1626 [45.4%) vs 342 of 1008 [33.9%]; P < .001) and require hospitalization (969 of 1626 [59.8%) vs 418 of 1008 [42.1%); P < .001) and anti-COVID-19 therapy (1004 of 1626 [61.7%) vs 501of 1008 [49.7%); P < .001) during the first major outbreak. The 14-day CFRs for the first and second major outbreaks were 25.6% (95% CI, 0.23-0.28) vs 16.2% (95% CI, 0.13-0.19; P < .001), respectively. After adjusting for country, sex, age, comorbidities, tumor stage and status, anti-COVID-19 and anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 complications, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak had an increased risk of death at 14 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.32) and 3 months (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51) compared with those diagnosed in the second outbreak. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this registry-based study suggest that mortality in patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 has improved in Europe; this improvement may be associated with earlier diagnosis, improved management, and dynamic changes in community transmission over time.
- Published
- 2021
14. Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 sequelae on treatment and survival of patients with cancer who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection: evidence from the OnCovid retrospective, multicentre registry study
- Author
-
David J Pinato, Josep Tabernero, Mark Bower, Lorenza Scotti, Meera Patel, Emeline Colomba, Saoirse Dolly, Angela Loizidou, John Chester, Uma Mukherjee, Alberto Zambelli, Alessia Dalla Pria, Juan Aguilar-Company, Diego Ottaviani, Amani Chowdhury, Eve Merry, Ramon Salazar, Alexia Bertuzzi, Joan Brunet, Matteo Lambertini, Marco Tagliamento, Anna Pous, Ailsa Sita-Lumsden, Krishnie Srikandarajah, Johann Colomba, Fanny Pommeret, Elia Seguí, Daniele Generali, Salvatore Grisanti, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Gianpiero Rizzo, Michela Libertini, Charlotte Moss, Joanne S Evans, Beth Russell, Nadia Harbeck, Bruno Vincenzi, Federica Biello, Rossella Bertulli, Raquel Liñan, Sabrina Rossi, Maria Carmen Carmona-García, Carlo Tondini, Laura Fox, Alice Baggi, Vittoria Fotia, Alessandro Parisi, Giampero Porzio, Maristella Saponara, Claudia Andrea Cruz, David García-Illescas, Eudald Felip, Ariadna Roqué Lloveras, Rachel Sharkey, Elisa Roldán, Roxana Reyes, Irina Earnshaw, Daniela Ferrante, Javier Marco-Hernández, Isabel Ruiz-Camps, Gianluca Gaidano, Andrea Patriarca, Riccardo Bruna, Anna Sureda, Clara Martinez-Vila, Ana Sanchez de Torre, Luca Cantini, Marco Filetti, Lorenza Rimassa, Lorenzo Chiudinelli, Michela Franchi, Marco Krengli, Armando Santoro, Aleix Prat, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Nikolaos Diamantis, Thomas Newsom-Davis, Alessandra Gennari, Alessio Cortellini, Judith Swallow, Chris Chung, Gino Dettorre, Neha Chopra, Alvin JX Lee, Christopher CT Sng, Yien Ning Sophia Wong, Myria Galazi, Sarah Benafif, Palma Dileo, Grisma Patel, Anjui Wu, Alasdair Sinclair, Gehan Soosaipillai, Eleanor Jones, Amanda Jackson, Martine Piccart, Emeline Colomba-Blameble, Claudia A Cruz, Elia Segui, David Garcia Illescas, Oriol Mirallas, Anna Carbó, Isabel Garcia, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ricard Mesia, Clara Maluquer, Francesca D'Avanzo, Giuseppe Tonini, Salvatore Provenzano, Valeria Tovazzi, Corrado Ficorella, Paola Queirolo, Raffaele Giusti, Francesca Mazzoni, Federica Zoratto, Marco Tucci, Rossana Berardi, Annalisa Guida, Sergio Bracarda, Maria Iglesias, Pinato, D. J., Tabernero, J., Bower, M., Scotti, L., Patel, M., Colomba, E., Dolly, S., Loizidou, A., Chester, J., Mukherjee, U., Zambelli, A., Dalla Pria, A., Aguilar-Company, J., Ottaviani, D., Chowdhury, A., Merry, E., Salazar, R., Bertuzzi, A., Brunet, J., Lambertini, M., Tagliamento, M., Pous, A., Sita-Lumsden, A., Srikandarajah, K., Colomba, J., Pommeret, F., Segui, E., Generali, D., Grisanti, S., Pedrazzoli, P., Rizzo, G., Libertini, M., Moss, C., Evans, J. S., Russell, B., Harbeck, N., Vincenzi, B., Biello, F., Bertulli, R., Linan, R., Rossi, S., Carmona-Garcia, M. C., Tondini, C., Fox, L., Baggi, A., Fotia, V., Parisi, A., Porzio, G., Saponara, M., Cruz, C. A., Garcia-Illescas, D., Felip, E., Roque Lloveras, A., Sharkey, R., Roldan, E., Reyes, R., Earnshaw, I., Ferrante, D., Marco-Hernandez, J., Ruiz-Camps, I., Gaidano, G., Patriarca, A., Bruna, R., Sureda, A., Martinez-Vila, C., Sanchez de Torre, A., Cantini, L., Filetti, M., Rimassa, L., Chiudinelli, L., Franchi, M., Krengli, M., Santoro, A., Prat, A., Van Hemelrijck, M., Diamantis, N., Newsom-Davis, T., Gennari, A., Cortellini, A., Swallow, J., Chung, C., Dettorre, G., Chopra, N., Lee, A. J., Sng, C. C., Wong, Y. N. S., Galazi, M., Benafif, S., Dileo, P., Patel, G., Wu, A., Sinclair, A., Soosaipillai, G., Jones, E., Jackson, A., Piccart, M., Colomba-Blameble, E., Garcia Illescas, D., Mirallas, O., Carbo, A., Garcia, I., Wuerstlein, R., Mesia, R., Maluquer, C., D'Avanzo, F., Tonini, G., Provenzano, S., Tovazzi, V., Ficorella, C., Queirolo, P., Giusti, R., Mazzoni, F., Zoratto, F., Tucci, M., Berardi, R., Guida, A., Bracarda, S., and Iglesias, M.
- Subjects
Adult ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Belgium ,COVID-19 ,Disease Progression ,Female ,France ,Germany ,Hospitalization ,Humans ,Italy ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Neoplasms ,Prevalence ,Registries ,Retrospective Studies ,Spain ,United Kingdom ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Registry study ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,OnCovid ,cancer treatment ,Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,80 and over ,In patient ,business.industry ,Cancer ,Retrospective cohort study ,Articles ,medicine.disease ,Oncology ,Research centre ,Population study ,business - Abstract
Background: The medium-term and long-term impact of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is not yet known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and their impact on the survival of patients with cancer. We also aimed to describe patterns of resumption and modifications of systemic anti-cancer therapy following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: OnCovid is an active European registry study enrolling consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with a history of solid or haematological malignancy and who had a diagnosis of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this retrospective study, patients were enrolled from 35 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, and entered into the registry at the point of data lock (March 1, 2021), were eligible for analysis. The present analysis was focused on COVID-19 survivors who underwent clinical reassessment at each participating institution. We documented prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and described factors associated with their development and their association with post-COVID-19 survival, which was defined as the interval from post-COVID-19 reassessment to the patients’ death or last follow-up. We also evaluated resumption of systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients treated within 4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis. The OnCovid study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974. Findings: 2795 patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, were entered into the study by the time of the data lock on March 1, 2021. After the exclusion of ineligible patients, the final study population consisted of 2634 patients. 1557 COVID-19 survivors underwent a formal clinical reassessment after a median of 22·1 months (IQR 8·4–57·8) from cancer diagnosis and 44 days (28–329) from COVID-19 diagnosis. 234 (15·0%) patients reported COVID-19 sequelae, including respiratory symptoms (116 [49·6%]) and residual fatigue (96 [41·0%]). Sequelae were more common in men (vs women; p=0·041), patients aged 65 years or older (vs other age groups; p=0·048), patients with two or more comorbidities (vs one or none; p=0·0006), and patients with a history of smoking (vs no smoking history; p=0·0004). Sequelae were associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 (p
- Published
- 2021
15. Previous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations and complications in patients with cancer: Results of a propensity-matched analysis of the OnCovid registry.
- Author
-
Mostaghim A, Minkove S, Aguilar-Company J, Ruiz-Camps I, Eremiev-Eremiev S, Dettorre GM, Fox L, Tondini C, Brunet J, Carmona-García M, Lambertini M, Bower M, Newsom-Davis T, Sharkey R, Pria AD, Rossi M, Plaja A, Salazar R, Sureda A, Prat A, Michalarea V, Van Hemelrijck M, Sita-Lumsden A, Bertuzzi A, Rimassa L, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Pedrazzoli P, Lee AJ, Murphy C, Belessiotis K, Diamantis N, Mukherjee U, Pommeret F, Stoclin A, Martinez-Vila C, Bruna R, Gaidano G, D'Avanzo F, Gennari A, Athale J, Eichacker P, Pinato DJ, Torabi-Parizi P, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, COVID-19 Testing, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use, Hospitalization, Registries, Retrospective Studies, COVID-19 complications, Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Objectives: To date, studies have not provided definitive answers regarding whether previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment alters outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19., Methods: The OnCovid registry (NCT04393974) was searched from February 27, 2020, to January 31, 2022, for patients who received systemic anti-cancer therapy in the 4 weeks before laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Propensity-score matching using country, vaccination status, primary tumor type, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumor stage, and remission status investigated differences in predefined clinical outcomes comparing those who had or had not received ICIs., Results: Of 3523 patients screened, 137 ICI-only and 1378 non-ICI met inclusion criteria. Before matching, ICI patients were older, male, enrolled at centers in Italy, and had histories of smoking, thoracic cancers, advanced cancer stages, and active malignancies (P ≤0.02). After matching, there were 120 ICI and 322 non-ICI patients. ICI patients had no differences (odds ratio: 95% CI) in presenting COVID-19 symptoms (0.69: 0.37-1.28), receipt of COVID-specific therapy (0.88: 0.54-1.41), 14-day (0.95: 0.56-1.61), or 28-day (0.79: 0.48-1.29) mortalities. However, ICI patients required less COVID-19-related hospitalization (0.37: 0.21-0.67) and oxygen therapy (0.51: 0.31-0.83) and developed fewer complications (0.57: 0.36-0.92)., Conclusion: In this propensity-score matched analysis, previous ICI therapy did not worsen and potentially improved COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Declarations of competing interest Alessio Cortellini received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche; and speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, and Eisai. Matteo Lambertini acted as a consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, and Seagen and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Ipsen and Sandoz outside the submitted work. Alessandra Gennari has declared consulting/advisory role for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, and Daichii Sankyo; speakers bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo; research funds: Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Roche. CMV has received travel grants and other honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Roche. Joan Brunet has declared consulting/advisory role for MSD and Astra Zenec, and support for attending meetings and/or travel for GSK. Josep Tabernero reports personal financial interest in the form of scientific consultancy role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna Inc, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Scandion Oncology, Scorpion Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc. Stocks: Oniria Therapeutics and also educational collaboration with Imedex/HMP, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Physicians Education Resource (PER). Lorenza Rimassa reports receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Servier, Taiho Oncology, Zymeworks; lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Servier; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; and institutional research funding from Agios, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks. David J Pinato received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, Eisai, Falk Foundation, travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, DaVolterra, and Astra Zeneca; research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Tagliamento M, Gennari A, Lambertini M, Salazar R, Harbeck N, Del Mastro L, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Sharkey R, Dalla Pria A, Plaja A, Jackson A, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Martinez-Vila C, Matas M, Miguel Rodriguez A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Pedrazzoli P, D'Avanzo F, Biello F, Sinclair A, Lee AJX, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Mirallas O, Pimentel I, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Guida A, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Parisi A, Aujayeb A, Prat A, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Rossi M, Zoratto F, Generali D, Saura C, Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Pinato DJ, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Female, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Pandemics, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Vaccines
- Abstract
Purpose: Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice., Methods: We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR
28 ) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis., Results: By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls., Conclusion: Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529)-related COVID-19 sequelae in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer: results from the OnCovid registry.
- Author
-
Cortellini A, Tabernero J, Mukherjee U, Salazar R, Sureda A, Maluquer C, Ferrante D, Bower M, Sharkey R, Mirallas O, Plaja A, Cucurull M, Mesia R, Dalla Pria A, Newsom-Davis T, Van Hemelrijck M, Sita-Lumsden A, Apthorp E, Vincenzi B, Di Fazio GR, Tonini G, Pantano F, Bertuzzi A, Rossi S, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Pedrazzoli P, Biello F, D'Avanzo F, Lee AJX, Shawe-Taylor M, Rogers L, Murphy C, Cooper L, Andaleeb R, Khalique S, Bawany S, Ahmed S, Carmona-García MC, Fort-Culillas R, Liñan R, Zoratto F, Rizzo G, Perachino M, Doonga K, Gaidano G, Bruna R, Patriarca A, Martinez-Vila C, Pérez Criado I, Giusti R, Mazzoni F, Antonuzzo L, Santoro A, Parisi A, Queirolo P, Aujayeb A, Rimassa L, Diamantis N, Bertulli R, Fulgenzi CAM, D'Alessio A, Ruiz-Camps I, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Garcia Illescas D, Medina I, Fox L, Gennari A, Aguilar-Company J, and Pinato DJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Disease Progression, COVID-19 complications, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Neoplasms epidemiology, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Background: COVID-19 sequelae can affect about 15% of patients with cancer who survive the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection and can substantially impair their survival and continuity of oncological care. We aimed to investigate whether previous immunisation affects long-term sequelae in the context of evolving variants of concern of SARS-CoV-2., Methods: OnCovid is an active registry that includes patients aged 18 years or older from 37 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and a history of solid or haematological malignancy, either active or in remission, followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death. We evaluated the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae in patients who survived COVID-19 and underwent a formal clinical reassessment, categorising infection according to the date of diagnosis as the omicron (B.1.1.529) phase from Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022; the alpha (B.1.1.7)-delta (B.1.617.2) phase from Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021; and the pre-vaccination phase from Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020. The prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae was compared according to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation status and in relation to post-COVID-19 survival and resumption of systemic anticancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974., Findings: At the follow-up update on June 20, 2022, 1909 eligible patients, evaluated after a median of 39 days (IQR 24-68) from COVID-19 diagnosis, were included (964 [50·7%] of 1902 patients with sex data were female and 938 [49·3%] were male). Overall, 317 (16·6%; 95% CI 14·8-18·5) of 1909 patients had at least one sequela from COVID-19 at the first oncological reassessment. The prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae was highest in the pre-vaccination phase (191 [19·1%; 95% CI 16·4-22·0] of 1000 patients). The prevalence was similar in the alpha-delta phase (110 [16·8%; 13·8-20·3] of 653 patients, p=0·24), but significantly lower in the omicron phase (16 [6·2%; 3·5-10·2] of 256 patients, p<0·0001). In the alpha-delta phase, 84 (18·3%; 95% CI 14·6-22·7) of 458 unvaccinated patients and three (9·4%; 1·9-27·3) of 32 unvaccinated patients in the omicron phase had sequelae. Patients who received a booster and those who received two vaccine doses had a significantly lower prevalence of overall COVID-19 sequelae than unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (ten [7·4%; 95% CI 3·5-13·5] of 136 boosted patients, 18 [9·8%; 5·8-15·5] of 183 patients who had two vaccine doses vs 277 [18·5%; 16·5-20·9] of 1489 unvaccinated patients, p=0·0001), respiratory sequelae (six [4·4%; 1·6-9·6], 11 [6·0%; 3·0-10·7] vs 148 [9·9%; 8·4-11·6], p=0·030), and prolonged fatigue (three [2·2%; 0·1-6·4], ten [5·4%; 2·6-10·0] vs 115 [7·7%; 6·3-9·3], p=0·037)., Interpretation: Unvaccinated patients with cancer remain highly vulnerable to COVID-19 sequelae irrespective of viral strain. This study confirms the role of previous SARS-CoV-2 immunisation as an effective measure to protect patients from COVID-19 sequelae, disruption of therapy, and ensuing mortality., Funding: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AC has received consulting fees from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Roche, and speakers' fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, and Eisai. ML acted as a consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, and Seagen, and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Ipsen, and Sandoz outside the submitted work. AG declares consulting or advisory roles for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, and Daichii Sankyo; speakers' fees for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo; and research funds from Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Roche. CM-V has received travel grants and other honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, and Roche. JB has declared consulting or advisory roles for MSD and AstraZeneca, and support for attending meetings and travel from GlaxoSmithKline. OM reports personal fees from Grupo Pacifico, Kyowa Kirin, Roche, and ROVI, and travel support from Almirall, Kyowa Kirin, and Sanofi. JT reports personal financial interest in the form of scientific consultancy roles for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Scandion Oncology, Scorpion Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics, and TheraMyc; stocks in Oniria Therapeutics; and educational collaboration with Imedex/HMP, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Physicians Education Resource. LRi reports receiving consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Taiho Oncology, and Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier; travel expenses from AstraZeneca; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, and Zymeworks. AD'A has received educational support for congress attendance and consultancy fees from Roche. DJP has received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, Eisai, and the Falk Foundation; travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, DaVolterra, and Astra Zeneca; and institutional research funding from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with melanoma: results of the Spanish Melanoma Group registry.
- Author
-
Gonzalez-Cao M, Puertolas T, Martinez-Vila C, Carrera C, Maldonado Seral C, Rodríguez-Jiménez P, Sequero S, Cerezuela-Fuentes P, Feltes Ochoa R, Muñoz E, Antoñanzas Basa M, Martín-Liberal J, Soria A, Francisco Rodriguez Moreno J, Marquez-Rodas I, Lopez Criado P, Luis Manzano J, Lopez-Castro R, Ayala de Miguel P, Villalobos L, Martin Algarra S, Gonzalez-Barrallo I, Boada A, García Castaño A, Puig S, Crespo G, Luna Fra P, Aguayo Zamora C, Feito Rodríguez M, Valles L, Drozdowskyj A, Gardeazabal J, Antonio Fernandez-Morales L, Rodrigo A, Cruz R, Yelamos O, Rubio B, Mujica K, Provencio M, and Berrocal A
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Child, Adolescent, Young Adult, Adult, Middle Aged, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Male, SARS-CoV-2, Registries, COVID-19 epidemiology, Melanoma complications, Melanoma therapy, Diabetes Mellitus
- Abstract
Background: The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) developed a national registry of patients with melanoma infected by SARS-CoV-2 ("GRAVID")., Methods: The main objective was to describe the COVID-19 fatality rate in patients with melanoma throughout the pandemic, as well as to explore the effect of melanoma treatment and tumor stage on the risk of COVID-19 complications. These are the final data of the register, including cases from February 2020 to September 2021., Results: One hundred-fifty cases were registered. Median age was 68 years (range 6-95), 61 (40%) patients were females, and 63 (42%) patients had stage IV. Thirty-nine (26%) were on treatment with immunotherapy, and 17 (11%) with BRAF-MEK inhibitors. COVID-19 was resolved in 119 cases, including 85 (57%) patients cured, 15 (10%) that died due to melanoma, and 20 (13%) that died due to COVID-19. Only age over 60 years, cardiovascular disorders, and diabetes mellitus increased the risk of death due to COVID-19, but not advanced melanoma stage nor melanoma systemic therapies. Three waves have been covered by the register: February-May 2020, August-November 2020, and December 2020-April 2021. The first wave had the highest number of registered cases and COVID-19 mortality., Conclusion: Tumor stage or melanoma treatments are non-significant prognostic factors for COVID-19 mortality. During the pandemic in Spain there was a downward trend in the number of patients registered across the waves, as well as in the severity of the infection., Gov Identifier: NCT04344002., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and breakthrough infections in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer.
- Author
-
Cortellini A, Aguilar-Company J, Salazar R, Bower M, Sita-Lumsden A, Plaja A, Lee AJX, Bertuzzi A, Tondini C, Diamantis N, Martinez-Vila C, Prat A, Apthorp E, Gennari A, and Pinato DJ
- Subjects
- Humans, COVID-19 Testing, Immunity, Innate, Reinfection, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology, Hematologic Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms epidemiology, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Background: Consolidated evidence suggests spontaneous immunity from SARS-CoV-2 is not durable, leading to the risk of reinfection, especially in the context of newly emerging viral strains. In patients with cancer who survive COVID-19 prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are unknown., Methods: We aimed to document natural history and outcome from SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in patients recruited to OnCovid (NCT04393974), an active European registry enrolling consecutive patients with a history of solid or haematologic malignancy diagnosed with COVID-19., Results: As of December 2021, out of 3108 eligible participants, 1806 COVID-19 survivors were subsequently followed at participating institutions. Among them, 34 reinfections (1.9%) were reported after a median time of 152 days (range: 40-620) from the first COVID-19 diagnosis, and with a median observation period from the second infection of 115 days (95% CI: 27-196). Most of the first infections were diagnosed in 2020 (27, 79.4%), while most of reinfections in 2021 (25, 73.5%). Haematological malignancies were the most frequent primary tumour (12, 35%). Compared to first infections, second infections had lower prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms (52.9% vs 91.2%, P = 0.0008) and required less COVID-19-specific therapy (11.8% vs 50%, P = 0.0013). Overall, 11 patients (32.4%) and 3 (8.8%) were fully and partially vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 before the second infection, respectively. The 14-day case fatality rate was 11.8%, with four death events, none of which among fully vaccinated patients., Conclusion: This study shows that reinfections in COVID-19 survivors with cancer are possible and more common in patients with haematological malignancies. Reinfections carry a 11% risk of mortality, which rises to 15% among unvaccinated patients, highlighting the importance of universal vaccination of patients with cancer., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 protects from morbidity, mortality and sequelae from COVID19 in patients with cancer.
- Author
-
Pinato DJ, Ferrante D, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Salazar R, Mirallas O, Sureda A, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Maluquer C, Pedrazzoli P, Biello F, Lee AJX, Sng CCT, Liñan R, Rossi S, Carmona-García MC, Sharkey R, Eremiev S, Rizzo G, Bain HD, Yu T, Cruz CA, Perachino M, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Fort-Culillas R, Doonga K, Fox L, Roldán E, Zoratto F, Gaidano G, Ruiz-Camps I, Bruna R, Patriarca A, Shawe-Taylor M, Fusco V, Martinez-Vila C, Berardi R, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Santoro A, Delfanti S, Parisi A, Queirolo P, Aujayeb A, Rimassa L, Prat A, Tabernero J, Gennari A, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Testing, COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, Morbidity, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Background: Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccines immunogenicity in patients with cancer has been investigated, whether they can significantly improve the severity of COVID-19 in this specific population is undefined., Methods: Capitalizing on OnCovid (NCT04393974) registry data we reported COVID-19 mortality and proxies of COVID-19 morbidity, including post-COVID-19 outcomes, according to the vaccination status of the included patients., Results: 2090 eligible patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 02/2020 and 11/2021 were included, of whom 1930 (92.3%) unvaccinated, 91 (4.4%) fully vaccinated and 69 (3.3%) partially vaccinated. With the exception of a higher prevalence of patients from the UK (p = 0.0003) and receiving systemic anticancer therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis (p = 0.0082) among fully vaccinated patients, no demographics/oncological features were associated with vaccination status. The 14-days case fatality rate (CFR) (5.5% vs 20.7%, p = 0.0004) and the 28-days CFR (13.2% vs 27.4%, p = 0.0028) demonstrated a significant improvement for fully vaccinated patients in comparison with unvaccinated patients. The receipt of prior full vaccination was also associated with reduced symptomatic COVID-19 (79.1% vs 88.5%, p = 0.0070), need of COVID-19 oriented therapy (34.9% vs 63.2%, p < 0.0001), complications from COVID-19 (28.6% vs 39.4%, p = 0.0379), hospitalizations due to COVID-19 (42.2% vs 52.5%, p = 0.0007) and oxygen therapy requirement (35.7% vs 52%, p = 0.0036). Following Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) procedure no statistically significant difference according to the vaccination status was confirmed; however, all COVID-19 related outcomes were concordantly in favour of full vaccination. Among the 1228 (58.8%) patients who underwent a formal reassessment at participating centres after COVID-19 resolution, fully vaccinated patients experienced less sequelae than unvaccinated patients (6.7% vs 17.2%, p = 0.0320)., Conclusions: This analysis provides initial evidence in support of the beneficial effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: As corresponding author of the abovementioned manuscript, I declare on behalf of my co-authors the following conflict of interests: David J Pinato received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, EISAI, Falk Foundation, travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, DaVolterra and Astra Zeneca; research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS.Aleix Prat has declared personal honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo; travel, accommodations, and expenses paid by Daiichi Sankyo; research funding from Roche and Novartis; and consulting/advisory role for NanoString Technologies, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb.Matteo Lambertini acted as consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, Seagen and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Ipsen and Sandoz outside the submitted work.Joan Brunet has declared consulting/advisory role for MSD and Astra Zeneca.Alessandra Gennari has declared consulting/advisory role for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, EISAI, and Daichii Sankyo; speakers bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo; research funds: EISAI, Eli Lilly, and Roche. CMV has received travel grants and other honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis and Roche.Gianluca Gaidano has declared consulting/advisory role for Janssen, Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca and BeiGene, and speaker fees from Janssen and Abbvie.Lorenza Rimassa received consulting fees from Taiho Oncology, Servier, Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks.Joseph Tabernero reported consulting fees from Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Avvinity, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna Inc, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Scandion Oncology, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc. He also reported speaker's fees from Imedex, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education and Physicians Education Resource (PER). He also declared institutional research support from Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Debiopharm International SA, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Janssen-Cilag SA, MedImmune, Menarini, Merck Health KGAA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus NV, Mirati, Novartis Farmacéutica SA, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement, Servier, Taiho Pharma USA Inc, Spanish Association Against Cancer Scientific Foundation and Cancer Research UK.Alessio Cortellini received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche; speakers' fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis and Eisai.All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.London, April 18th, 2022., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. COVID-19 Sequelae and the Host Proinflammatory Response: An Analysis From the OnCovid Registry.
- Author
-
Cortellini A, Gennari A, Pommeret F, Patel G, Newsom-Davis T, Bertuzzi A, Viladot M, Aguilar-Company J, Mirallas O, Felip E, Lee AJX, Dalla Pria A, Sharkey R, Brunet J, Carmona-García M, Chester J, Mukherjee U, Scotti L, Dolly S, Sita-Lumsden A, Ferrante D, Van Hemelrijck M, Moss C, Russell B, Seguí E, Biello F, Krengli M, Marco-Hernández J, Gaidano G, Patriarca A, Bruna R, Roldán E, Fox L, Pous A, Griscelli F, Salazar R, Martinez-Vila C, Sureda A, Loizidou A, Maluquer C, Stoclin A, Iglesias M, Pedrazzoli P, Rizzo G, Santoro A, Rimassa L, Rossi S, Harbeck N, Sanchez de Torre A, Vincenzi B, Libertini M, Provenzano S, Generali D, Grisanti S, Berardi R, Tucci M, Mazzoni F, Lambertini M, Tagliamento M, Parisi A, Zoratto F, Queirolo P, Giusti R, Guida A, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Maconi A, Betti M, Colomba E, Diamantis N, Sinclair A, Bower M, Ruiz-Camps I, and Pinato DJ
- Subjects
- C-Reactive Protein analysis, COVID-19 Testing, Disease Progression, Humans, Lactate Dehydrogenases, Lymphocytes chemistry, Neutrophils chemistry, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Registries, Retrospective Studies, COVID-19 complications, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Fifteen percent of patients with cancer experience symptomatic sequelae, which impair post-COVID-19 outcomes. In this study, we investigated whether a proinflammatory status is associated with the development of COVID-19 sequelae., Methods: OnCovid recruited 2795 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 infection between February 27, 2020, and February 14, 2021. This analysis focused on COVID-19 survivors who underwent a clinical reassessment after the exclusion of patients with hematological malignancies. We evaluated the association of inflammatory markers collected at COVID-19 diagnosis with sequelae, considering the impact of previous systemic anticancer therapy. All statistical tests were 2-sided., Results: Of 1339 eligible patients, 203 experienced at least 1 sequela (15.2%). Median baseline C-reactive protein (CRP; 77.5 mg/L vs 22.2 mg/L, P < .001), lactate dehydrogenase (310 UI/L vs 274 UI/L, P = .03), and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR; 6.0 vs 4.3, P = .001) were statistically significantly higher among patients who experienced sequelae, whereas no association was reported for the platelet to lymphocyte ratio and the OnCovid Inflammatory Score, which includes albumin and lymphocytes. The widest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was reported for baseline CRP (AUC = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.69), followed by the NLR (AUC = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.61) and lactate dehydrogenase (AUC = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.61). Using a fixed categorical multivariable analysis, high CRP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.67 to 3.91) and NLR (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.10) were confirmed to be statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of sequelae. Exposure to chemotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of sequelae (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.91), whereas no associations with immune checkpoint inhibitors, endocrine therapy, and other types of systemic anticancer therapy were found., Conclusions: Although the association between inflammatory status, recent chemotherapy and sequelae warrants further investigation, our findings suggest that a deranged proinflammatory reaction at COVID-19 diagnosis may predict for sequelae development., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant outbreak among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer in Europe: results from the retrospective, multicentre, OnCovid registry study.
- Author
-
Pinato DJ, Aguilar-Company J, Ferrante D, Hanbury G, Bower M, Salazar R, Mirallas O, Sureda A, Plaja A, Cucurull M, Mesia R, Townsend S, Jackson A, Dalla Pria A, Newsom-Davis T, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Apthorp E, Vincenzi B, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Maluquer C, Pedrazzoli P, Biello F, Sinclair A, Bawany S, Khalique S, Rossi S, Rogers L, Murphy C, Belessiotis K, Carmona-García MC, Sharkey R, García-Illescas D, Rizzo G, Perachino M, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Doonga K, Fox L, Roldán E, Gaidano G, Ruiz-Camps I, Bruna R, Patriarca A, Martinez-Vila C, Cantini L, Zambelli A, Giusti R, Mazzoni F, Caliman E, Santoro A, Grosso F, Parisi A, Queirolo P, Aujayeb A, Rimassa L, Prat A, Tucci M, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Fusco V, Generali D, Provenzano S, Gennari A, Tabernero J, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Aged, COVID-19 Testing, Disease Outbreaks, Europe epidemiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Registries, Retrospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Neoplasms epidemiology, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Background: The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible and escapes vaccine-induced immunity. We aimed to describe outcomes due to COVID-19 during the omicron outbreak compared with the prevaccination period and alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) waves in patients with cancer in Europe., Methods: In this retrospective analysis of the multicentre OnCovid Registry study, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, who had a history of solid or haematological malignancy that was either active or in remission. Patient were recruited from 37 oncology centres from UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany. Participants were followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death or loss to follow-up, while being treated as per standard of care. For this analysis, we excluded data from centres that did not actively enter new data after March 1, 2021 (in France, Germany, and Belgium). We compared measures of COVID-19 morbidity, which were complications from COVID-19, hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and requirement of supplemental oxygen and COVID-19-specific therapies, and COVID-19 mortality across three time periods designated as the prevaccination (Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020), alpha-delta (Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021), and omicron (Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022) phases. We assessed all-cause case-fatality rates at 14 days and 28 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 overall and in unvaccinated and fully vaccinated patients and in those who received a booster dose, after adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour type, stage, and status, and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974, and is ongoing., Findings: As of Feb 4, 2022 (database lock), the registry included 3820 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 between Feb 27, 2020, and Jan 31, 2022. 3473 patients were eligible for inclusion (1640 [47·4%] were women and 1822 [52·6%] were men, with a median age of 68 years [IQR 57-77]). 2033 (58·5%) of 3473 were diagnosed during the prevaccination phase, 1075 (31·0%) during the alpha-delta phase, and 365 (10·5%) during the omicron phase. Among patients diagnosed during the omicron phase, 113 (33·3%) of 339 were fully vaccinated and 165 (48·7%) were boosted, whereas among those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase, 152 (16·6%) of 915 were fully vaccinated and 21 (2·3%) were boosted. Compared with patients diagnosed during the prevaccination period, those who were diagnosed during the omicron phase had lower case-fatality rates at 14 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·32 [95% CI 0·19-0·61) and 28 days (0·34 [0·16-0·79]), complications due to COVID-19 (0·26 [0·17-0·46]), and hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (0·17 [0·09-0·32]), and had less requirements for COVID-19-specific therapy (0·22 [0·15-0·34]) and oxygen therapy (0·24 [0·14-0·43]) than did those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. Unvaccinated patients diagnosed during the omicron phase had similar crude case-fatality rates at 14 days (ten [25%] of 40 patients vs 114 [17%] of 656) and at 28 days (11 [27%] of 40 vs 184 [28%] of 656) and similar rates of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (18 [43%] of 42 vs 266 [41%] of 652) and complications from COVID-19 (13 [31%] of 42 vs 237 [36%] of 659) as those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase., Interpretation: Despite time-dependent improvements in outcomes reported in the omicron phase compared with the earlier phases of the pandemic, patients with cancer remain highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 if they are not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Our findings support universal vaccination of patients with cancer as a protective measure against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19., Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DJP has received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, Eisai, and Falk Foundation; travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, DaVolterra, and Astra Zeneca; and research funding (to their institution) from MSD and BMS. MLa has acted as consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, Seagen, and Gilead; and has received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Ipsen, Libbs, Knight, and Sandoz. FM has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly, MSD, Takeda, and Roche; and travel support from Sanofi. SP reported that their spouse is employed by AstraZeneca. ASa has received consulting fees from Arqule, Sanofi, and Incyte; speaker's fees from Takeda, BMS, Roche, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Servier, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Arqule, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Eisai, Novartis, Bayer, and MSD; and participation on data monitoring committees for BMS, Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, and MSD. FG has received consulting fees from Novocure, BMS, PharmaMar, and Novartis; speaker's fees from Novocure; travel support from MSD, Novocure, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, PharmaMar, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; and participation on a data safety monitoring board for MSD, BMS, PharmaMar and Novartis. JH has a leadership role with Blood Cancer UK. NS-G has received speakers' fees from Amgen. GG has received consulting fees or had an advisory role for Janssen, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Roche, Incyte, and BeiGene, and reported speaker fees from Janssen and AbbVie. LRi has received consulting fees from Taiho Oncology, Servier, Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, and Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, and Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, and Zymeworks. JT reports consulting fees from Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Avvinity, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, Inspirna, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Ona Therapeutics, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Scandion Oncology, Servier, Sotio Biotech, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics, and TheraMyc; speaker's fees from Imedex, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Physicians Education Resource; and institutional research support from Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Debiopharm International, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX, Hutchison MediPharma International, Janssen-Cilag, MedImmune, Menarini, Merck Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus NV, Mirati, Novartis Farmacéutica, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement, Servier, Taiho Pharma USA, Spanish Association Against Cancer Scientific Foundation, and Cancer Research UK. MB has received speakers' fee from Eisai pharma, Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV; and has had leadership roles in the European AIDS Clinical Society, UNAIDS, WHO, and The European Hematology Association/ European Society of Medical Oncology. AC has received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and speakers' fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, and Eisai. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Persistence of long-term COVID-19 sequelae in patients with cancer: An analysis from the OnCovid registry.
- Author
-
Cortellini A, Salazar R, Gennari A, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Maluquer C, Pedrazzoli P, Lee AJ, Carmona-García M, Newsom-Davis T, Van Hemelrijck M, Plaja A, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Generali D, Bertulli R, Diamantis N, Mukherjee U, Rizzo G, Yu T, Zoratto F, Bruna R, Sureda A, Martinez-Vila C, Cantini L, Mazzoni F, Grosso F, Parisi A, Saponara M, Prat A, and Pinato DJ
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Testing, Disease Progression, Humans, Registries, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, COVID-19 complications, COVID-19 epidemiology, Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms epidemiology, Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: A significant proportion of patients with cancer who recover from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may experience COVID-19 sequelae in the early post-infection phase, which negatively affect their continuity of care and oncological outcome. The long-term prevalence and clinical impact of the post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients with cancer are largely unknown., Methods: In this study, we describe the time course of COVID-19 sequelae in patients with non-advanced cancers enrolled in the OnCovid registry., Results: Overall, 186 patients were included, with a median observation period of 9.9 months (95%CI:8,8-11.3) post-COVID-19 resolution. After a median interval of 2.3 months post-COVID-19 (interquartile range: 1.4-3.7), 31 patients (16.6%) reported ≥1 sequelae, including respiratory complications (14, 7.6%), fatigue (13, 7.1%), neuro-cognitive sequelae (7, 3.8%). The vast majority of the patients were not vaccinated prior to COVID-19. COVID-19-related sequelae persisted in 9.8% and 8% of patients 6 and 12 months after COVID-19 resolution. Persistence of sequelae at first oncological follow-up was associated with history of complicated COVID-19 (45.2% vs 24.8%, p = 0.0223), irrespective of oncological features at COVID-19 diagnosis., Conclusion: This study confirms for the first time that, in a largely unvaccinated population, post-COVID-19 syndrome can affect a significant proportion of patients with non-advanced cancer who recovered from the acute illness. COVID-19 sequelae may persist up to 12 months in some patients, highlighting the need for dedicated prevention and supportive strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Alessio Cortellini received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche; speakers’ fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis and Eisai. David J Pinato received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, BMS, Roche, EISAI, Falk Foundation, travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, DaVolterra and Astra Zeneca; research funding (to institution) from MSD and BMS. Aleix Prat has declared personal honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo; travel, accommodations and expenses paid by Daiichi Sankyo; research funding from Roche and Novartis; and consulting/advisory role for NanoString Technologies, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Matteo Lambertini acted as consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, MSD, Pfizer, Seagen and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Ipsen and Sandoz outside the submitted work. Thomas Newsom-Davis has declared consulting/advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; speakers fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Takeda and travel, accommodations and expenses paid by AstraZenca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Otsuka, Roche, and Takeda. Joan Brunet has declared consulting/advisory role for MSD and Astra Zeneca. Alessandra Gennari has declared consulting/advisory role for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, EISAI, and Daichii Sankyo; speakers bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo; research funds: EISAI, Eli Lilly, and Roche. CMV has received travel grants and other honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis and Roche. Gianluca Gaidano has declared consulting/advisory role for Janssen, Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca and BeiGene, and speaker fees from Janssen and Abbvie. Lorenza Rimassa received consulting fees from Servier, Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen; and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Zymeworks. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Time-Dependent COVID-19 Mortality in Patients With Cancer: An Updated Analysis of the OnCovid Registry.
- Author
-
Pinato DJ, Patel M, Scotti L, Colomba E, Dolly S, Loizidou A, Chester J, Mukherjee U, Zambelli A, Dalla Pria A, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Salazar R, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Tagliamento M, Pous A, Sita-Lumsden A, Srikandarajah K, Colomba J, Pommeret F, Seguí E, Generali D, Grisanti S, Pedrazzoli P, Rizzo G, Libertini M, Moss C, Evans JS, Russell B, Harbeck N, Vincenzi B, Biello F, Bertulli R, Ottaviani D, Liñan R, Rossi S, Carmona-García MC, Tondini C, Fox L, Baggi A, Fotia V, Parisi A, Porzio G, Queirolo P, Cruz CA, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Felip E, Roqué Lloveras A, Newsom-Davis T, Sharkey R, Roldán E, Reyes R, Zoratto F, Earnshaw I, Ferrante D, Marco-Hernández J, Ruiz-Camps I, Gaidano G, Patriarca A, Bruna R, Sureda A, Martinez-Vila C, Sanchez de Torre A, Berardi R, Giusti R, Mazzoni F, Guida A, Rimassa L, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Krengli M, Santoro A, Prat A, Tabernero J, Van Hemelrijck M, Diamantis N, Gennari A, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pandemics, Registries, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Importance: Whether the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with cancer have improved in terms of disease management and capacity is yet to be defined., Objective: To test whether severity and mortality from COVID-19 among patients with cancer have improved during the course of the pandemic., Design, Setting, and Participants: OnCovid is a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with solid or hematologic cancer and COVID-19. This multicenter case series study included real-world data from 35 institutions across 6 countries (UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany). This update included patients diagnosed between February 27, 2020, and February, 14, 2021. Inclusion criteria were confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a history of solid or hematologic cancer., Exposures: SARS-CoV-2 infection., Main Outcomes and Measures: Deaths were differentiated at 14 days and 3 months as the 2 landmark end points. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by stratifying patients across 5 phases (February to March 2020, April to June 2020, July to September 2020, October to December 2020, and January to February 2021) and across 2 major outbreaks (February to June 2020 and July 2020 to February 2021)., Results: At data cutoff, 2795 consecutive patients were included, with 2634 patients eligible for analysis (median [IQR] age, 68 [18-77] years ; 52.8% men). Eligible patients demonstrated significant time-dependent improvement in 14-day case-fatality rate (CFR) with estimates of 29.8% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33) for February to March 2020; 20.3% (95% CI, 0.17-0.23) for April to June 2020; 12.5% (95% CI, 0.06-22.90) for July to September 2020; 17.2% (95% CI, 0.15-0.21) for October to December 2020; and 14.5% (95% CI, 0.09-0.21) for January to February 2021 (all P < .001) across the predefined phases. Compared with the second major outbreak, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak were more likely to be 65 years or older (974 of 1626 [60.3%] vs 564 of 1008 [56.1%]; P = .03), have at least 2 comorbidities (793 of 1626 [48.8%] vs 427 of 1008 [42.4%]; P = .001), and have advanced tumors (708 of 1626 [46.4%] vs 536 of 1008 [56.1%]; P < .001). Complications of COVID-19 were more likely to be seen (738 of 1626 [45.4%] vs 342 of 1008 [33.9%]; P < .001) and require hospitalization (969 of 1626 [59.8%] vs 418 of 1008 [42.1%]; P < .001) and anti-COVID-19 therapy (1004 of 1626 [61.7%] vs 501 of 1008 [49.7%]; P < .001) during the first major outbreak. The 14-day CFRs for the first and second major outbreaks were 25.6% (95% CI, 0.23-0.28) vs 16.2% (95% CI, 0.13-0.19; P < .001), respectively. After adjusting for country, sex, age, comorbidities, tumor stage and status, anti-COVID-19 and anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 complications, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak had an increased risk of death at 14 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.32) and 3 months (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51) compared with those diagnosed in the second outbreak., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this registry-based study suggest that mortality in patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 has improved in Europe; this improvement may be associated with earlier diagnosis, improved management, and dynamic changes in community transmission over time.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 sequelae on treatment and survival of patients with cancer who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection: evidence from the OnCovid retrospective, multicentre registry study.
- Author
-
Pinato DJ, Tabernero J, Bower M, Scotti L, Patel M, Colomba E, Dolly S, Loizidou A, Chester J, Mukherjee U, Zambelli A, Dalla Pria A, Aguilar-Company J, Ottaviani D, Chowdhury A, Merry E, Salazar R, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Tagliamento M, Pous A, Sita-Lumsden A, Srikandarajah K, Colomba J, Pommeret F, Seguí E, Generali D, Grisanti S, Pedrazzoli P, Rizzo G, Libertini M, Moss C, Evans JS, Russell B, Harbeck N, Vincenzi B, Biello F, Bertulli R, Liñan R, Rossi S, Carmona-García MC, Tondini C, Fox L, Baggi A, Fotia V, Parisi A, Porzio G, Saponara M, Cruz CA, García-Illescas D, Felip E, Roqué Lloveras A, Sharkey R, Roldán E, Reyes R, Earnshaw I, Ferrante D, Marco-Hernández J, Ruiz-Camps I, Gaidano G, Patriarca A, Bruna R, Sureda A, Martinez-Vila C, Sanchez de Torre A, Cantini L, Filetti M, Rimassa L, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Krengli M, Santoro A, Prat A, Van Hemelrijck M, Diamantis N, Newsom-Davis T, Gennari A, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Belgium, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 mortality, Disease Progression, Female, France, Germany, Hospitalization, Humans, Italy, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms complications, Neoplasms drug therapy, Prevalence, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Spain, United Kingdom, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, COVID-19 complications, Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: The medium-term and long-term impact of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is not yet known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and their impact on the survival of patients with cancer. We also aimed to describe patterns of resumption and modifications of systemic anti-cancer therapy following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection., Methods: OnCovid is an active European registry study enrolling consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with a history of solid or haematological malignancy and who had a diagnosis of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this retrospective study, patients were enrolled from 35 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, and entered into the registry at the point of data lock (March 1, 2021), were eligible for analysis. The present analysis was focused on COVID-19 survivors who underwent clinical reassessment at each participating institution. We documented prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and described factors associated with their development and their association with post-COVID-19 survival, which was defined as the interval from post-COVID-19 reassessment to the patients' death or last follow-up. We also evaluated resumption of systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients treated within 4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis. The OnCovid study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974., Findings: 2795 patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, were entered into the study by the time of the data lock on March 1, 2021. After the exclusion of ineligible patients, the final study population consisted of 2634 patients. 1557 COVID-19 survivors underwent a formal clinical reassessment after a median of 22·1 months (IQR 8·4-57·8) from cancer diagnosis and 44 days (28-329) from COVID-19 diagnosis. 234 (15·0%) patients reported COVID-19 sequelae, including respiratory symptoms (116 [49·6%]) and residual fatigue (96 [41·0%]). Sequelae were more common in men (vs women; p=0·041), patients aged 65 years or older (vs other age groups; p=0·048), patients with two or more comorbidities (vs one or none; p=0·0006), and patients with a history of smoking (vs no smoking history; p=0·0004). Sequelae were associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 (p<0·0001), complicated COVID-19 (p<0·0001), and COVID-19 therapy (p=0·0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow-up of 128 days (95% CI 113-148), COVID-19 sequelae were associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·80 [95% CI 1·18-2·75]) after adjusting for time to post-COVID-19 reassessment, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 severity. Among 466 patients on systemic anti-cancer therapy, 70 (15·0%) permanently discontinued therapy, and 178 (38·2%) resumed treatment with a dose or regimen adjustment. Permanent treatment discontinuations were independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 3·53 [95% CI 1·45-8·59]), but dose or regimen adjustments were not (0·84 [0·35-2·02])., Interpretation: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely affect survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. Adjustments to systemic anti-cancer therapy can be safely pursued in treatment-eligible patients., Funding: National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DJP reports lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Eisai, and Falk Foundation; travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees from Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, DaVolterra, and Astra Zeneca; and research funding (to institution) from Merck Sharp and Dohme and Bristol Myers Squibb, outside of the submitted work. MLa acted as consultant for Roche, Novartis, Lilly, and AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work, and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, and Sandoz, outside of the submitted work. EF reports research funding to institution from Pfizer, outside of the submitted work, and travel expenses from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Esai, outside of the submitted work. TN-D reports consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda, outside of the submitted work; speakers fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche, and Takeda, outside of the submitted work; and travel, accommodation, and expenses from AstraZenca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Otsuka, Roche, and Takeda, outside of the submitted work. JB reports consulting fees for Merck Sharp and Dohme and Astra Zeneca, outside of the submitted work. APr reports personal honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme Oncology, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work; travel, accommodations, and expenses by Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work; research funding (to institution) from Roche and Novartis, outside of the submitted work; and consulting fees from NanoString Technologies, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside of the submitted work. APar reports consulting fees from Takeda and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. MT reports travel grants from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Takeda, outside of the submitted work; and honoraria as a medical writer from Novartis and Amgen, outside the submitted work. AG reports consulting fees from Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, and Daichii Sankyo, outside the submitted work; speakers bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Celgene, and Daichii Sankyo, outside the submitted work; research funds (to institution) from Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Roche, outside the submitted work; support for attending meetings or travel from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, and Roche, outside the submitted work; and personal research funding from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Foundation UPO aging project, outside the submitted work. GG reports personal research funding outside of the submitted work from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Foundation, outside the submitted work; consulting fees from Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, and BeiGene, outside the submitted work; and speaker fees from Janssen and Abbvie, outside the submitted work. LR reports consulting fees from Servier, Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi, and Zymeworks, outside the submitted work; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; travel expenses from Ipsen, outside the submitted work; and institutional research funding (to institution) from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, Fibrogen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, and Zymeworks, outside the submitted work. JT reports having a scientific consultancy role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Avvinity, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX, Hutchison MediPharma, Ikena Oncology, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics, and TheraMyc, outside of the submitted work; educational collaboration with Imedex, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education and Physicians Education Resource, outside of the submitted work; and institutional financial interest in form of financial support for clinical trials or contracted research for Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Debiopharm International, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, HalioDX, Hutchison MediPharma International, Janssen-Cilag, MedImmune, Menarini, Merck Healt, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merus, Mirati, Novartis Farmacéutica, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement, Servier, Taiho, Spanish Association Against Cancer Scientific Foundation, and Cancer Research UK, outside the submitted work. ACo reports consulting fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Roche, outside the submitted work; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, and Astellas, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a subanalysis of the OnCovid registry.
- Author
-
Garrigós L, Saura C, Martinez-Vila C, Zambelli A, Bower M, Pistilli B, Lambertini M, Ottaviani D, Diamantis N, Lumsden A, Pernas S, Generali D, Seguí E, Viñas G, Felip E, Sanchez A, Rizzo G, Santoro A, Cortellini A, Perone Y, Chester J, Iglesias M, Betti M, Vincenzi B, Libertini M, Mazzoni F, Zoratto F, Berardi R, Guida A, Wuerstlein R, Loizidou A, Sharkey R, Aguilar Company J, Matas M, Saggia C, Chiudinelli L, Colomba-Blameble E, Galazi M, Mukherjee U, Van Hemelrijck M, Marin M, Strina C, Prat A, Pla H, Ciruelos EM, Bertuzzi A, Del Mastro L, Porzio G, Newsom-Davis T, Ruiz I, Delany MB, Krengli M, Fotia V, Viansone A, Chopra N, Romeo M, Salazar R, Perez I, d'Avanzo F, Franchi M, Milani M, Pommeret F, Tucci M, Pedrazzoli P, Harbeck N, Ferrante D, Pinato DJ, and Gennari A
- Abstract
Background: Cancer patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and mortality than the rest of the population. Breast cancer patients seem to have better prognosis when infected by SARS-CoV-2 than other cancer patients., Methods: We report a subanalysis of the OnCovid study providing more detailed information in the breast cancer population., Results: We included 495 breast cancer patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 62.6 years; 31.5% presented more than one comorbidity. The most frequent breast cancer subtype was luminal-like ( n = 245, 49.5%) and 177 (35.8%) had metastatic disease. A total of 332 (67.1%) patients were receiving active treatment, with radical intent in 232 (47.6%) of them. Hospitalization rate was 58.2% and all-cause mortality rate was 20.3%. One hundred twenty-nine (26.1%) patients developed one COVID-19 complication, being acute respiratory failure the most common ( n = 74, 15.0%). In the multivariable analysis, age older than 70 years, presence of COVID-19 complications, and metastatic disease were factors correlated with worse outcomes, while ongoing anticancer therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis appeared to be a protective factor. No particular oncological treatment was related to higher risk of complications. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73 (18.3%) patients had some kind of modification on their oncologic treatment. At the first oncological reassessment (median time: 46.9 days ± 36.7), 255 (51.6%) patients reported to be fully recovered from the infection. There were 39 patients (7.9%) with long-term SARS-CoV-2-related complications., Conclusion: In the context of COVID-19, our data confirm that breast cancer patients appear to have lower complications and mortality rate than expected in other cancer populations. Most breast cancer patients can be safely treated for their neoplasm during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological treatment has no impact on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 complications, and, especially in the curative setting, the treatment should be modified as little as possible., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.J. Pinato reports personal fees from BMS (travel fees, grant to institution, and lecture fees), Eisai (consultancy, lecture fees, and occasional advisory board), H3B (consultancy and occasional advisory board), Astrazeneca (consultancy and occasional advisory board), MiNa therapeutics (consultancy), Roche (lecture fees), Viiv Healthcare (lecture fees), Bayer Healthcare (lecture fees), and Falk Foundation (lecture fees). A. Zambelli reports personal fees from Lilly (occasional advisory board and travel fees), Novartis (occasional advisory board and travel fees), Pfizer (occasional advisory board), Astrazeneca (occasional advisory board), and Roche (occasional advisory board). M. Bower reports personal fees from Gilead (lecture fees), ViiV (lecture fees), BMS (lecture fees), MSD (lecture fees), and Janssen (lecture fees). M. Lambertini reports personal fees from Roche (consultancy and travel fees), Novartis (consultancy and travel fees), Lilly (consultancy and travel fees), Astrazeneca (consultancy), Pfizer (travel fees), Sandoz (travel fees), and Takeda (travel fees). E. Felip reports personal fees from Pfizer (grant to institution) and Instituto Carlos III (research grant). A. Cortellini reports personal fees from BMS (consultancy), MSD (consultancy), Astrazeneca (consultancy and lecture fees), Roche (consultancy), Astellas (lecture fees), and Novartis (Lecture fees). F. Mazzoni reports personal fees from Roche (lecture fees), Takeda (lecture fees), MSD (lecture fees), BMS (lecture fees), Lilly (lecture fees), and Boehringer (lecture fees). M. Romeo reports personal fees from MSD (consultancy), Pfizer (travel fees), and GSK (occasional advisory board). A. Gennari reports personal fees from Astrazeneca (lecture fees), Lilly (lecture fees), Eisai (lecture fees), Pfizer (lecture fees), Novartis (lecture fees), Teva (lecture fees), and Daiichi Sankyo (lecture fees)., (© The Author(s), 2021.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Molecular Markers and Targets in Melanoma.
- Author
-
Teixido C, Castillo P, Martinez-Vila C, Arance A, and Alos L
- Subjects
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Biomarkers, Tumor metabolism, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use, Melanoma genetics, Melanoma metabolism, Melanoma pathology, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Mutation, Phenotype, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Skin Neoplasms genetics, Skin Neoplasms metabolism, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor antagonists & inhibitors, Melanoma drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Melanoma develops as a result of several genetic alterations, with UV radiation often acting as a mutagenic risk factor. Deep knowledge of the molecular signaling pathways of different types of melanoma allows better characterization and provides tools for the development of therapies based on the intervention of signals promoted by these cascades. The latest World Health Organization classification acknowledged the specific genetic drivers leading to melanoma and classifies melanocytic lesions into nine distinct categories according to the associate cumulative sun damage (CSD), which correlates with the molecular alterations of tumors. The largest groups are melanomas associated with low-CSD or superficial spreading melanomas, characterized by frequent presentation of the BRAF V600 mutation. High-CSD melanomas include lentigo maligna type and desmoplastic melanomas, which often have a high mutation burden and can harbor NRAS , BRAF non-V600E, or NF1 mutations. Non-CSD-associated melanomas encompass acral and mucosal melanomas that usually do not show BRAF , NRAS , or NF1 mutations (triple wild-type), but in a subset may have KIT or SF3B1 mutations. To improve survival, these driver alterations can be treated with targeted therapy achieving significant antitumor activity. In recent years, relevant improvement in the prognosis and survival of patients with melanoma has been achieved, since the introduction of BRAF / MEK tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of molecular pathways and discuss current and potential therapeutic targets in melanoma, focusing on their clinical relevance of development.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Determinants of enhanced vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 in UK patients with cancer: a European study.
- Author
-
Pinato DJ, Scotti L, Gennari A, Colomba-Blameble E, Dolly S, Loizidou A, Chester J, Mukherjee U, Zambelli A, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Galazi M, Salazar R, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Mesia R, Sita-Lumsden A, Colomba J, Pommeret F, Seguí E, Biello F, Generali D, Grisanti S, Rizzo G, Libertini M, Moss C, Evans JS, Russell B, Wuerstlein R, Vincenzi B, Bertulli R, Ottaviani D, Liñan R, Marrari A, Carmona-García MC, Sng CCT, Tondini C, Mirallas O, Tovazzi V, Fotia V, Cruz CA, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Felip E, R Lloveras A, Lee AJX, Newsom-Davis T, Sharkey R, Chung C, García-Illescas D, Reyes R, Sophia Wong YN, Ferrante D, Marco-Hernández J, Ruiz-Camps I, Gaidano G, Patriarca A, Sureda A, Martinez-Vila C, Sanchez de Torre A, Rimassa L, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Krengli M, Santoro A, Prat A, Tabernero J, V Hemelrijck M, Diamantis N, and Cortellini A
- Subjects
- Aged, COVID-19 therapy, Comorbidity, Europe epidemiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, SARS-CoV-2, United Kingdom epidemiology, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, COVID-19 epidemiology, Neoplasms complications
- Abstract
Background: Despite high contagiousness and rapid spread, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to heterogeneous outcomes across affected nations. Within Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK) is the most severely affected country, with a death toll in excess of 100,000 as of January 2021. We aimed to compare the national impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the risk of death in UK patients with cancer versus those in continental EU., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the OnCovid study database, a European registry of patients with cancer consecutively diagnosed with COVID-19 in 27 centres from 27th February to 10th September 2020. We analysed case fatality rates and risk of death at 30 days and 6 months stratified by region of origin (UK versus EU). We compared patient characteristics at baseline including oncological and COVID-19-specific therapy across UK and EU cohorts and evaluated the association of these factors with the risk of adverse outcomes in multivariable Cox regression models., Findings: Compared with EU (n = 924), UK patients (n = 468) were characterised by higher case fatality rates (40.38% versus 26.5%, p < 0.0001) and higher risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.36-1.99]) and 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis (47.64% versus 33.33%; p < 0.0001; HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.33-1.88]). UK patients were more often men, were of older age and have more comorbidities than EU counterparts (p < 0.01). Receipt of anticancer therapy was lower in UK than in EU patients (p < 0.001). Despite equal proportions of complicated COVID-19, rates of intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation, UK patients with cancer were less likely to receive anti-COVID-19 therapies including corticosteroids, antivirals and interleukin-6 antagonists (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses adjusted for imbalanced prognostic factors confirmed the UK cohort to be characterised by worse risk of death at 30 days and 6 months, independent of the patient's age, gender, tumour stage and status; number of comorbidities; COVID-19 severity and receipt of anticancer and anti-COVID-19 therapy. Rates of permanent cessation of anticancer therapy after COVID-19 were similar in the UK and EU cohorts., Interpretation: UK patients with cancer have been more severely impacted by the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic despite societal risk mitigation factors and rapid deferral of anticancer therapy. The increased frailty of UK patients with cancer highlights high-risk groups that should be prioritised for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Continued evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement D.J.P. received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Bayer Healthcare, travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for MiNA Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche and AstraZeneca and research funding (to the institution) from MSD and BMS. A.P. has declared personal honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo; travel, accommodations and expenses paid by Daiichi Sankyo; research funding from Roche and Novartis and a consulting/advisory role for NanoString Technologies, Amgen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. T.N-D. has declared a consulting/advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Takeda and travel, accommodations and expenses paid by AstraZenca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD, Otsuka, Roche and Takeda. J.B. has declared a consulting/advisory role for MSD and AstraZeneca. PPS has declared a consulting/advisory role for Sanofi and AbbVie. A.P. has declared a consulting/advisory role for Takeda and Sanofi. MP has declared a consulting/advisory role for Gilead and Bayer. A.G. has declared a consulting/advisory role for Roche, MSD, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, EISAI and Daiichi Sankyo; is on the speaker's bureau for Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Teva, Gentili, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Celgene and Daiichi Sankyo and declared research funds from EISAI, Eli Lilly and Roche. C.M.-V. has received travel grants and other honoraria from BMS, MSD, Novartis and Roche. L.R. received consulting fees from Amgen, ArQule, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Hengrui, Incyte, Ipsen, IQVIA, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche, Sanofi and Zymeworks; lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Roche and Sanofi; travel expenses from Ipsen and institutional research funding from Agios, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Eisai, Exelixis, FibroGen, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Nerviano Medical Sciences, Roche and Zymeworks. J.T. reports personal financial interest in form of a scientific consultancy role for Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Genentech, Inc., HalioDX SAS, Ikena Oncology, IQVIA, Imedex, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, NeoPhore, Novartis, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc. A.C. received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche and speakers' fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis and Astellas. All the remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Ki67 expression as a predictor of chemotherapy outcome in low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
- Author
-
Grabowski JP, Martinez Vila C, Richter R, Taube E, Plett H, Braicu E, and Sehouli J
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous pathology, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous surgery, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Organoplatinum Compounds administration & dosage, Ovarian Neoplasms pathology, Ovarian Neoplasms surgery, Young Adult, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous drug therapy, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous metabolism, Ki-67 Antigen biosynthesis, Ovarian Neoplasms drug therapy, Ovarian Neoplasms metabolism
- Abstract
Objective: Low-grade serous ovarian cancers characterize a unique clinical pattern and lower chemotherapy responsiveness. The expression level of Ki67 is associated with differences in prognosis; however, this has not yet been evaluated in regard to predicting the outcome of therapy., Methods: Patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancers were identified in an institutional database. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to find cut-off values of Ki67 to discriminate patients with residual tumor mass after surgery from maximal debulked patients: therapy response and therapy-free interval (TFI)., Results: A total of 68 patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer were identified. All patients underwent surgery. 61 (89.7%) patients received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy; of these 61 patients, 13 (21.3%) had residual mass (>0 mm) after primary cytoreduction and 11 (18%) received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Ki67 ≥3.6% was associated with higher risk of residual mass after surgery (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.45 to 45.18; p=0.017). Patients with Ki67 <3.6% showed a therapy-free interval of ≥6 months more often (OR 13.9, 95% CI 1.62 to 118.40; p=0.016). In the multivariate analysis of TFI <6 months, including CA125, age at diagnosis, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and ascites, Ki67 <3.6% remained a significant prognostic factor (OR 18.8, 95% CI 1.77 to 199.09; p=0.015). Chemotherapy responsiveness was evaluated in 21 patients who had residual disease and/or received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Ki67 ≥4.0% (OR 44.1, 95%CI 2.36-825.17, p = 0.011) was related to a significantly higher response rate (complete and partial response)., Conclusions: This is the first study to show an association between Ki67 expression and chemotherapy response, duration of TFI to platinum-based chemotherapy as well as outcome of surgery in low-grade serous ovarian cancers. Further prospective trials should use Ki-67 as a stratification factor to explore the effect of chemotherapy and endocrine strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.