The scientiic and technological (S&T) development of the Russian Federation is one of the government top priorities. In the context of globalization, a clear image of the country’s global S&T ranking can be helpful for decision making in science policy. The paper analyzes the main international statistical data banks which allow for cross-country comparisons of S&T capabilities and reviews various international rankings, including special innovation indices and rankings based on science and technology indicators, which provide opportunity to locate position of Russia in the global S&T and innovation landscape. The study is based on data from the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), UNESCO, international rankings relecting the countries’ readiness for a knowledge-based economy: the Global Innovation Index, the Bloomberg Innovation Index, The IMD World Competitiveness, The Global Talent Competitiveness Index, the Networked Readiness Index. The article focuses on analysis of Russia’s positions in international science, technology and innovation rankings. The discussion ends with the conclusion that despite rather high R&D expenditures and quality of human capital, R&D efectiveness and impact of S&T on the Russian economy are estimated as rather low., {"references":["RUSSIA. PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. (2016) Presidential Decree No. 624 of 01.12.2016 On the Strategy for Scientiic and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. ConsultantPlus legal reference system.","MANSFIELD, E. (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. No. 4. P. 741–766.","BLACKMAN, A. W., SELIGMAN, E. J., SOGLIERO, G. C. (1973) An innovation index based on factor analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. No. 3. P. 301–316.","HOLLIDAY, D. R., LOWITT, H. E. (1984) An integer-based blackman innovation index: Hypothesis, evidence, and implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. No. 1. P. 59–79.","NAGAOKA, S., MOTOHASHI K., GOTO, A. (2010) Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. No. 2. P. 1083–1127.","COOMBS, R., NARANDREN, P., RICHARDS, A. (1996) A literature-based innovation output indicator. Research policy. No. 3. P. 403–413.","WONGLIMPIYARAT, J. (2010) Innovation index and the innovative capacity of nations. Futures. No. 3. P. 247–253.","WONGLIMPIYARAT, J. (2009) Charting the innovation index. International journal of technology, policy and management. No. 4. P. 331–341.","REJEB, H. B., et al. (2008) Measuring innovation best practices: Improvement of an innovation index integrating threshold and synergy efects. Technovation. No. 12. P. 838–854.","LANJOUW, J. O., SCHANKERMAN, M. (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal. No. 495. P. 441–465.","KEMP, R. G. M., et al. (2003) Innovation and irm performance. The Netherlands: EIM. 67 p. Available from: http://ondernemerschap.panteia.nl/pdf-ez/h200207.pdf [Accessed: 26th May 2017].","PERANI, J., SIRILLI, G. (2008) Benchmarking of innovation activities in European countries. Foresight. No. 1. P. 4–15.","GUSEV, A. B. (2009) Formation of ratings of innovative development of Russian regions. Science. Innovations. Education. No. 8. P. 158–173.","SVIRIDOVA, N. V., SHOPYRIN, A. V. (2013) Analysis of techniques of innovative activity ratings construction. University Proceedings. Volga region. Social Sciences. No. 4. P. 341–347.","OECD. (2016) OECD Data. Russian Federation. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/russian-federation.htm [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","UNESCO. Institute for statistics. (2016) UIS. Stat. Available from: http://data.uis.unesco.org/ [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WIPO. (2017) IP Statistics Data Center. Available from: https:// www3.wipo.int/ipstats/index.htm [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WIPO. (2016) World Intellectual Property Indicators 2016. Geneve: WIPO Publication. 172 p. Available from: http://www. wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2016.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","JAMRISKO, M., LU, W. (17th January 2017) These Are the World's Most Innovative Economies. Nordic nations dominate the top 15, while South Korea reigns supreme and Russia is dealt a huge blow. Bloomberg.com. Available from: https://www. bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-17/sweden-gains-south- korea-reigns-as-world-s-most-innovative-economies [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INSEAD, WIPO. (2014) The Global Innovation Index 2014. The Human Factor in Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva: WIPO Publication. 429 p. Available from:https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/ reportpdf/gii-2014-v5.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INSEAD, WIPO. (2015) The Global Innovation Index 2015. Efective Innovation Policies for Development. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva: WIPO Publication. 453 p. Available from: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/ useriles/ile/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INSEAD, WIPO. (2016) The Global Innovation Index 2016. Winning with Global Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva: WIPO Publication. 451 p. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016. pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. (2014) The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 565 p. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/ WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf [Accessed:19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. (2015) The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 403 p. Available from: http://reports.weforum.org/global- competitiveness-report-2015-2016/ [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. (2016) The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 400 p. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitiveness Report2016-2017_FINAL.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS CENTER. (2017) World Competitiveness Ranking. Available from: http://www.imd.org/ wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world- competitiveness-yearbook-ranking/ [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","INSEAD. (2014) The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2014. Growing talent for today and tomorrow. Singapore: INSEAD. 332 p. Available from: https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/iles/ assets/dept/globalindices/docs/GTCI-2014-report.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","INSEAD. (2015) The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2015–2016. Talent Attraction and International Mobility. Fontainebleau: INSEAD. 346 p. Available from: https://www. insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/globalindices/docs/ GTCI-2015-2016-report.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","INSEAD. (2016) The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2017. Talent and Technology. Fontainebleau: INSEAD. 332 p. Available from:https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/ globalindices/docs/GTCI-2017-report.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, INSEAD. (2014) The Global Information Technology Report 2014. Rewards and Risks of Big Data. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 369 p. Available from:http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF GlobalInformationTechnology_Report_2014.pdf [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, INSEAD. (2015) The Global Information Technology Report 2015. ICTs for Inclusive Growth. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 381 p. Available from: http:// reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology-report-2015/ [Accessed: 19th April 2017].","WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, INSEAD. (2016) The Global Information Technology Report 2016. Innovating in the Digital Economy. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 317 p. Available from: http://reports.weforum.org/global-information-technology- report-2015/ [Accessed: 19th April 2017]."]}