Search

BackgroundThe complex 3-dimensional (3D) nature of anatomical abnormalities in congenital heart disease (CHD) necessitates multidisciplinary group discussions centered around the review of medical images such as magnetic resonance imaging. Currently, group viewings of medical images are constrained to 2-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional displays of 3D scans. However, 2D display methods could introduce additional challenges since they require physicians to accurately reconstruct the images mentally into 3D anatomies for diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgery or other therapies. Virtual reality (VR) software may enhance diagnosis and care of CHD via 3D visualization of medical images. Yet, present-day VR developments for medicine lack the emphasis on multiuser collaborative environments, and the effect of displays and level of immersion for diagnosing CHDs have not been studied. ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracies and preferences of various display systems, including the conventional 2D display and a novel group VR software, in group discussions of CHD. MethodsA total of 22 medical trainees consisting of 1 first-year, 10 second-year, 4 third-year, and 1 fourth-year residents and 6 medical students, who volunteered for the study, were formed into groups of 4 to 5 participants. Each group discussed three diagnostic cases of CHD with varying structural complexity using conventional 2D display and group VR software. A group VR software, Cardiac Review 3D, was developed by our team using the Unity engine. By using different display hardware, VR was classified into nonimmersive and full-immersive settings. The discussion time, diagnostic accuracy score, and peer assessment were collected to capture the group and individual diagnostic performances. The diagnostic accuracies for each participant were scored by two experienced cardiologists following a predetermined answer rubric. At the end of the study, all participants were provided a survey to rank their preferences of the display systems for performing group medical discussions. ResultsDiagnostic accuracies were highest when groups used the full-immersive VR compared with the conventional and nonimmersive VR (χ22=9.0, P=.01) displays. Differences between the display systems were more prominent with increasing case complexity (χ22=14.1, P

Introduction: Electrophysiology studies and ablation procedures require strength, steadiness, and dexterity to manipulate catheters. We have previously described a novel catheter torque tool (Peritorq) that improves torqueability and stability and decreases user muscle fatigue. The objective was to evaluate measures of catheter integrity with and without the torque tool in place using multiple diagnostic and ablation catheters in an adult porcine model. Methods: Diagnostic and ablation catheters were inserted through the femoral or jugular vein into areas of the right atrium, coronary sinus (CS), and right ventricle. Electrical measurements including impedance, sensing, and capture thresholds were obtained with and without the torque tool. Ablation lesions (30 s) were given at different locations using both irrigated and nonirrigated catheters and measurements were recorded with and without the torque tool. Results: Procedures were performed in eight adult pigs. Measurements with and without the torque tool in all locations did not differ significantly using any of the catheters. With the nonirrigated ablation catheter there was a significant difference in maximum (mean 1.7 W, p =.03) and average power (mean 9.1 W, p =.04) delivery at the PS tricuspid valve, but there were no other differences with the irrigated or nonirrigated catheters. Subjective assessment by the operator revealed a substantial improvement in maneuverability, ability to transfer torque, and stability within the cardiac space. Conclusion: In an in‐vivo environment, a novel catheter torque tool subjectively improved catheter manipulation and did not have a significant impact on the integrity of electrophysiologic catheters. Further study including additional catheters and in‐vivo human testing is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]