Search

Background The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) is a measure of quality of life (QoL) impacts in hyperhidrosis (HH). Objectives We aimed to establish score banding systems for the HidroQoL total score for specific contexts representing different severity/impact categories by using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) as anchors, including data from 357 patients from a phase III clinical trial. Methods We used the HDSS, the established DLQI score bands and two single items (items 5 and 7) of the DLQI as anchors for the creation of banding systems for the HidroQoL. These anchors were chosen via consensus among an expert group according to relevance to patient experience. Due to the distribution of the HDSS and the single DLQI item 7, receiver operating characteristic curves were computed in order to create an optimal cut-off value of the HidroQoL total score. For the DLQI banding system and the single DLQI item 5, we created a banding system for the HidroQoL based on the distribution of their different categories. Results A score of 30 and greater is proposed as the cut-off value for sweating that 'always interferes in daily activities', based on the HDSS as anchor. In terms of overall skin QoL effects, score bands of 0–6, 7–18, 19–25, 26–32 and 33–36 represent 'no effect', 'small effect', 'moderate effect', 'very large effect' and 'extremely large effect' on the patient's life, respectively. Conclusions In this study, we propose different banding systems for four different contexts: skin-specific QoL (DLQI banding), HH severity (HDSS), working and studying (single DLQI item 7) and social and leisure activities (single DLQI item 5). These banding systems and cut-off values can be used in clinical research and practice to place the patients in different severity categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A study from the USA found a mean DLQI score of 4-9 (SD 6-6) in atopic dermatitis.[8] However, in these two studies, patients with mild disease severity were also included and therefore the mean DLQI scores might not be comparable. A previous study assessed the mean DLQI scores in different dermatological conditions.[3] For example, in psoriasis a mean DLQI score of 8-9 (SD 6-3) was found, and in pruritus the mean DLQI score was 10-5 (SD 5-8). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) assesses quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by different dermatological conditions.[3] Therefore, the DLQI can be used to capture the burden of HH in affected patients. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Pruritus reduces quality of life and may occur at different sites of the body. To alleviate pruritus, lipid replenishing and rehydration of the skin is often unsatisfactory. Thus, products with additional antipruritic effects are needed. Objectives: Antipruritic effects and cosmetic properties of two different emulsions, water-in-oil (w/o) or oil-in-water (o/w), and a shampoo containing a lipophilic Echinacea purpurea root extract (Ec.-extract) were assessed in adults suffering from pruritus. Methods: Adults (n = 55) with pruritus of the body applied a w/o emulsion for 2 weeks. In a separate study, adults (n = 33) with a pruritic scalp applied an o/w-emulsion for 4 weeks. In a third study, shampoo (n = 34) was applied for 4 weeks. Objective (erythema, dryness, and papules) and subjective (intensity, duration, and burden of pruritus) parameters were assessed. Results: Treatment with the w/o emulsion significantly reduced erythema and dryness (P [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL ©) is a well-developed patient-reported outcome measure assessing the quality of life (QoL) impacts in hyperhidrosis, which has proven very good measurement properties, such as structural validity and internal consistency., Objectives: We aimed to investigate responsiveness over time and estimate values for meaningful within-person change (MWPC) towards symptom improvement for different measurement time points (4 and 12 weeks), extending the existing validity evidence in patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis., Methods: Data (from a phase IIIb clinical trial) was collected at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, week 28, week 52, and week 72. For the assessment of responsiveness, HidroQoL change scores were correlated with corresponding change scores of the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the gravimetric sweat production based on a-priori formulated hypotheses. Furthermore, it was tested whether the different HDSS change score groups differed significantly from each other over time and whether the HidroQoL was sensitive towards these group differences over time. This was extended by the calculation of matched-pair tests and effect sizes to test significance for each change group separately. For the estimation of MWPC thresholds towards symptom improvement, different anchor-based and integrated approaches were used., Results: In total, the sample was composed of 357 patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. For the assessment of responsiveness, 5 out of 14 a-priori hypotheses regarding the correlation of the change scores could be confirmed, whereas the rejected hypotheses only marginally differed from the expected values. Furthermore, regarding responsiveness, the HidroQoL showed sensitivity towards symptom improvement at each measurement time point. Effect sizes were large as expected (d ≥ 0.806). MWPC thresholds towards symptom improvement were proposed for two measurement time points: 5 (week 4) and 6 (week 12). Increasing MWPC values over time were observed., Conclusion: This study extends the evidence for the longitudinal validity of the HidroQoL up to 72 weeks and proposed MWPC thresholds for different time intervals (4 and 12 weeks) after baseline, aiding interpretability. Results concur with findings from previous validation studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) is a measure of quality of life (QoL) impacts in hyperhidrosis (HH)., Objectives: We aimed to establish score banding systems for the HidroQoL total score for specific contexts representing different severity/impact categories by using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) as anchors, including data from 357 patients from a phase III clinical trial., Methods: We used the HDSS, the established DLQI score bands and two single items (items 5 and 7) of the DLQI as anchors for the creation of banding systems for the HidroQoL. These anchors were chosen via consensus among an expert group according to relevance to patient experience. Due to the distribution of the HDSS and the single DLQI item 7, receiver operating characteristic curves were computed in order to create an optimal cut-off value of the HidroQoL total score. For the DLQI banding system and the single DLQI item 5, we created a banding system for the HidroQoL based on the distribution of their different categories., Results: A score of 30 and greater is proposed as the cut-off value for sweating that 'always interferes in daily activities', based on the HDSS as anchor. In terms of overall skin QoL effects, score bands of 0-6, 7-18, 19-25, 26-32 and 33-36 represent 'no effect', 'small effect', 'moderate effect', 'very large effect' and 'extremely large effect' on the patient's life, respectively., Conclusions: In this study, we propose different banding systems for four different contexts: skin-specific QoL (DLQI banding), HH severity (HDSS), working and studying (single DLQI item 7) and social and leisure activities (single DLQI item 5). These banding systems and cut-off values can be used in clinical research and practice to place the patients in different severity categories., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)