Search

The independent set reconfiguration problem (ISReconf) is the problem of determining, for given independent sets I_s and I_t of a graph G, whether I_s can be transformed into I_t by repeatedly applying a prescribed reconfiguration rule that transforms an independent set to another. As reconfiguration rules for the ISReconf, the Token Sliding (TS) model and the Token Jumping (TJ) model are commonly considered. While the TJ model admits the addition of any vertex (as far as the addition yields an independent set), the TS model admits the addition of only a neighbor of the removed vertex. It is known that the complexity status of the ISReconf differs between the TS and TJ models for some graph classes. In this paper, we analyze how changes in reconfiguration rules affect the computational complexity of reconfiguration problems. To this end, we generalize the TS and TJ models to a unified reconfiguration rule, called the k-Jump model, which admits the addition of a vertex within distance k from the removed vertex. Then, the TS and TJ models are the 1-Jump and D(G)-Jump models, respectively, where D(G) denotes the diameter of a connected graph G. We give the following three results: First, we show that the computational complexity of the ISReconf under the k-Jump model for general graphs is equivalent for all k >= 3. Second, we present a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the ISReconf under the 2-Jump model for split graphs. We note that the ISReconf under the 1-Jump (i.e., TS) model is PSPACE-complete for split graphs, and hence the complexity status of the ISReconf differs between k = 1 and k = 2. Third, we consider the optimization variant of the ISReconf, which computes the minimum number of steps of any transformation between Is and It. We prove that this optimization variant under the k-Jump model is NP-complete for chordal graphs of diameter at most 2k + 1, for any k >=3., Comment: 16 pages, 6 figures

An \emph{$\alpha$-approximate vertex fault-tolerant distance sensitivity oracle} (\emph{$\alpha$-VSDO}) for a weighted input graph $G=(V, E, w)$ and a source vertex $s \in V$ is the data structure answering an $\alpha$-approximate distance from $s$ to $t$ in $G-x$ for any given query $(x, t) \in V \times V$. It is a data structure version of the so-called single-source replacement path problem (SSRP). In this paper, we present a new \emph{nearly linear-time} algorithm of constructing a $(1 + \epsilon)$-VSDO for any directed input graph with polynomially bounded integer edge weights. More precisely, the presented oracle attains $\tilde{O}(m \log (nW)/ \epsilon + n \log^2 (nW)/\epsilon^2)$ construction time, $\tilde{O}(n \log (nW) / \epsilon)$ size, and $\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon)$ query time, where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ is the number of edges, and $W$ is the maximum edge weight. These bounds are all optimal up to polylogarithmic factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-trivial algorithm for SSRP/VSDO beating $\tilde{O}(mn)$ computation time for directed graphs with general edge weight functions, and also the first nearly linear-time construction breaking approximation factor 3. Such a construction has been unknown even for undirected and unweighted graphs. In addition, our result implies that the known conditional lower bounds for the exact SSRP computation does not apply to the case of approximation.

Consider that there are $k\le n$ agents in a simple, connected, and undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges. The goal of the dispersion problem is to move these $k$ agents to mutually distinct nodes. Agents can communicate only when they are at the same node, and no other communication means, such as whiteboards, are available. We assume that the agents operate synchronously. We consider two scenarios: when all agents are initially located at a single node (rooted setting) and when they are initially distributed over one or more nodes (general setting). Kshemkalyani and Sharma presented a dispersion algorithm for the general setting, which uses $O(m_k)$ time and $\log(k + \Delta)$ bits of memory per agent [OPODIS 2021], where $m_k$ is the maximum number of edges in any induced subgraph of $G$ with $k$ nodes, and $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of $G$. This algorithm is currently the fastest in the literature, as no $o(m_k)$-time algorithm has been discovered, even for the rooted setting. In this paper, we present significantly faster algorithms for both the rooted and the general settings. First, we present an algorithm for the rooted setting that solves the dispersion problem in $O(k\log \min(k,\Delta))=O(k\log k)$ time using $O(\log (k+\Delta))$ bits of memory per agent. Next, we propose an algorithm for the general setting that achieves dispersion in $O(k \log k \cdot \log \min(k,\Delta))=O(k \log^2 k)$ time using $O(\log (k+\Delta))$ bits. Finally, for the rooted setting, we give a time-optimal (i.e.,~$O(k)$-time) algorithm with $O(\Delta+\log k)$ bits of space per agent. All algorithms presented in this paper work only in the synchronous setting, while several algorithms in the literature, including the one given by Kshemkalyani and Sharma at OPODIS 2021, work in the asynchronous setting.

We propose a self-stabilizing leader election (SS-LE) protocol on ring networks in the population protocol model. Given a rough knowledge $\psi = \lceil \log n \rceil + O(1)$ on the population size $n$, the proposed protocol lets the population reach a safe configuration within $O(n^2 \log n)$ steps with high probability starting from any configuration. Thereafter, the population keeps the unique leader forever. Since no protocol solves SS-LE in $o(n^2)$ steps with high probability, the convergence time is near-optimal: the gap is only an $O(\log n)$ multiplicative factor. This protocol uses only $polylog(n)$ states. There exist two state-of-the-art algorithms in current literature that solve SS-LE on ring networks. The first algorithm uses a polynomial number of states and solves SS-LE in $O(n^2)$ steps, whereas the second algorithm requires exponential time but it uses only a constant number of states. Our proposed algorithm provides an excellent middle ground between these two., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2009.10926

We investigated the computational power of a single mobile agent in an $n$-node graph with storage (i.e., node memory). Generally, a system with one-bit agent memory and $O(1)$-bit storage is as powerful as that with $O(n)$-bit agent memory and $O(1)$-bit storage. Thus, we focus on the difference between one-bit memory and oblivious (i.e., zero-bit memory) agents. Although their computational powers are not equivalent, all the known results exhibiting such a difference rely on the fact that oblivious agents cannot transfer any information from one side to the other across the bridge edge. Hence, our main question is as follows: Are the computational powers of one-bit memory and oblivious agents equivalent in 2-edge-connected graphs or not? The main contribution of this study is to answer this question under the relaxed assumption that each node has $O(\log\Delta)$-bit storage (where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of the graph). We present an algorithm for simulating any algorithm for a single one-bit memory agent using an oblivious agent with $O(n^2)$-time overhead per round. Our results imply that the topological structure of graphs differentiating the computational powers of oblivious and non-oblivious agents is completely characterized by the existence of bridge edges., Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures

We investigate the computational power of the deterministic single-agent model where the agent and each node are equipped with a limited amount of persistent memory. Tasks are formalized as decision problems on properties of input graphs, i.e., the task is defined as a subset $\mathcal{T}$ of all possible input graphs, and the agent must decide if the network belongs to $\mathcal{T}$ or not. We focus on the class of the decision problems which are solvable in a polynomial number of movements, and polynomial-time local computation. The contribution of this paper is the computational power of the very weak system with one-bit agent memory and $O(1)$-bit storage (i.e. node memory) is equivalent to the one with $O(n)$-bit agent memory and $O(1)$-bit storage. We also show that the one-bit agent memory is crucial to lead this equivalence: There exists a decision task which can be solved by the one-bit memory agent but cannot be solved by the zero-bit memory (i.e., oblivious) agent. Our result is deduced by the algorithm of simulating the $O(n)$-bit memory agent by the one-bit memory agent with polynomial-time overhead, which is developed by two novel technical tools. The first one is a dynamic $s$-$t$ path maintenance mechanism which uses only $O(1)$-bit storage per node. The second one is a new lexicographically-ordered DFS algorithm for the mobile agent system with $O(1)$-bit memory and $O(1)$-bit storage per node. These tools are of independent interest.

The \emph{$f$-fault-tolerant connectivity labeling} ($f$-FTC labeling) is a scheme of assigning each vertex and edge with a small-size label such that one can determine the connectivity of two vertices $s$ and $t$ under the presence of at most $f$ faulty edges only from the labels of $s$, $t$, and the faulty edges. This paper presents a new deterministic $f$-FTC labeling scheme attaining $O(f^2 \mathrm{polylog}(n))$-bit label size and a polynomial construction time, which settles the open problem left by Dory and Parter [PODC'21]. The key ingredient of our construction is to develop a deterministic counterpart of the graph sketch technique by Ahn, Guha, and McGreger [SODA'12], via some natural connection with the theory of error-correcting codes. This technique removes one major obstacle in de-randomizing the Dory-Parter scheme. The whole scheme is obtained by combining this technique with a new deterministic graph sparsification algorithm derived from the seminal $\epsilon$-net theory, which is also of independent interest. As byproducts, our result deduces the first deterministic fault-tolerant approximate distance labeling scheme with a non-trivial performance guarantee and an improved deterministic fault-tolerant compact routing. The authors believe that our new technique is potentially useful in the future exploration of more efficient FTC labeling schemes and other related applications based on graph sketches.

An autonomous mobile robot system consisting of many mobile computational entities (called robots) attracts much attention of researchers, and to clarify the relation between the capabilities of robots and solvability of the problems is an emerging issue for a recent couple of decades. Generally, each robot can observe all other robots as long as there are no restrictions for visibility range or obstructions, regardless of the number of robots. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on the observation by robots; a robot cannot necessarily observe all other robots regardless of distances to them. We call this new computational model defected view model. Under this model, in this paper, we consider the gathering problem that requires all the robots to gather at the same point and propose two algorithms to solve the gathering problem in the adversarial ($N$,$N-2$)-defected model for $N \geq 5$ (where each robot observes at most $N-2$ robots chosen adversarially) and the distance-based (4,2)-defected model (where each robot observes at most 2 closest robots to itself) respectively, where $N$ is the number of robots. Moreover, we present an impossibility result showing that there is no (deterministic) gathering algorithm in the adversarial or distance-based (3,1)-defected model. Moreover, we show an impossibility result for the gathering in a relaxed ($N$, $N-2$)-defected model., Comment: 18 pages, 11 figures, will be published as a brief announcement (short version) in DISC2022

A distributed system consisting of a huge number of computational entities is prone to faults, because faults in a few nodes cause the entire system to fail. Consequently, fault tolerance of distributed systems is a critical issue. Checkpoint-rollback recovery is a universal and representative technique for fault tolerance; it periodically records the entire system state (configuration) to non-volatile storage, and the system restores itself using the recorded configuration when the system fails. To record a configuration of a distributed system, a specific algorithm known as a snapshot algorithm is required. However, many snapshot algorithms require coordination among all nodes in the system; thus, frequent executions of snapshot algorithms require unacceptable communication cost, especially if the systems are large. As a sophisticated snapshot algorithm, a partial snapshot algorithm has been introduced that takes a partial snapshot (instead of a global snapshot). However, if two or more partial snapshot algorithms are concurrently executed, and their snapshot domains overlap, they should coordinate, so that the partial snapshots (taken by the algorithms) are consistent. In this paper, we propose a new efficient partial snapshot algorithm with the aim of reducing communication for the coordination. In a simulation, we show that the proposed algorithm drastically outperforms the existing partial snapshot algorithm, in terms of message and time complexity.

We propose a self-stabilizing leader election protocol on directed rings in the model of population protocols. Given an upper bound $N$ on the population size $n$, the proposed protocol elects a unique leader within $O(nN)$ expected steps starting from any configuration and uses $O(N)$ states. This convergence time is optimal if a given upper bound $N$ is asymptotically tight, i.e., $N=O(n)$.

We consider the dispersion problem for mobile agents. Initially, k agents are located at arbitrary nodes in an undirected graph. Agents can migrate from node to node via an edge in the graph synchronously. Our goal is to let the k agents be located at different k nodes with minimizing the number of steps before dispersion is completed and the working memory space used by the agents. Kshemkalyani and Ali [ICDCN, 2019] present a fast and space-efficient dispersion algorithm with the assumption that each agent has global knowledge such as the number of edges and the maximum degree of a graph. In this paper, we present a dispersion algorithm that does not require such global knowledge but keeps the asymptotically same running time and slightly smaller memory space.

This paper presents a randomized self-stabilizing algorithm that elects a leader $r$ in a general $n$-node undirected graph and constructs a spanning tree $T$ rooted at $r$. The algorithm works under the synchronous message passing network model, assuming that the nodes know a linear upper bound on $n$ and that each edge has a unique ID known to both its endpoints (or, alternatively, assuming the $KT_{1}$ model). The highlight of this algorithm is its superior communication efficiency: It is guaranteed to send a total of $\tilde{O} (n)$ messages, each of constant size, till stabilization, while stabilizing in $\tilde{O} (n)$ rounds, in expectation and with high probability. After stabilization, the algorithm sends at most one constant size message per round while communicating only over the ($n - 1$) edges of $T$. In all these aspects, the communication overhead of the new algorithm is far smaller than that of the existing (mostly deterministic) self-stabilizing leader election algorithms. The algorithm is relatively simple and relies mostly on known modules that are common in the fault free leader election literature; these modules are enhanced in various subtle ways in order to assemble them into a communication efficient self-stabilizing algorithm., Comment: An extended abstract version of this manuscript has been accepted for publication in DISC 2020

We consider the leader election problem in population protocol models. In pragmatic settings of population protocols, self-stabilization is a highly desired feature owing to its fault resilience and the benefit of initialization freedom. However, the design of self-stabilizing leader election is possible only under a strong assumption (i.e. the knowledge of the \emph{exact} size of a network) and rich computational resources (i.e. the number of states). Loose-stabilization, introduced by Sudo et al [Theoretical Computer Science, 2012], is a promising relaxed concept of self-stabilization to address the aforementioned issue. Loose-stabilization guarantees that starting from any configuration, the network will reach a safe configuration where a single leader exists within a short time, and thereafter it will maintain the single leader for a long time, but not forever. The main contribution of the paper is a time-optimal loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol. While the shortest convergence time achieved so far in loosely-stabilizing leader election is $O(\log^3 n)$ parallel time, the proposed protocol with design parameter $\tau \ge 1$ attains $O(\tau \log n)$ parallel convergence time and $\Omega(n^{\tau})$ parallel holding time (i.e. the length of the period keeping the unique leader), both in expectation. This protocol is time-optimal in the sense of both the convergence and holding times in expectation because any loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol with the same length of the holding time is known to require $\Omega(\tau \log n)$ parallel time.

In the population protocol model, many problems cannot be solved in a self-stabilizing way. However, global knowledge, such as the number of nodes in a network, sometimes allows us to design a self-stabilizing protocol for such problems. In this paper, we investigate the effect of global knowledge on the possibility of self-stabilizing population protocols in arbitrary graphs. Specifically, we clarify the solvability of the leader election problem, the ranking problem, the degree recognition problem, and the neighbor recognition problem by self-stabilizing population protocols with knowledge of the number of nodes and/or the number of edges in a network.

We consider the minimal k-grouping problem: given a graph G=(V,E) and a constant k, partition G into subgraphs of diameter no greater than k, such that the union of any two subgraphs has diameter greater than k. We give a silent self-stabilizing asynchronous distributed algorithm for this problem in the composite atomicity model of computation, assuming the network has unique process identifiers. Our algorithm works under the weakly-fair daemon. The time complexity (i.e., the number of rounds to reach a legitimate configuration) of our algorithm is O(nD/k) where n is the number of processes in the network and \diam is the diameter of the network. The space complexity of each process is O((n +n_{false})log n) where n_{false} is the number of false identifiers, i.e., identifiers that do not match the identifier of any process, but which are stored in the local memory of at least one process at the initial configuration. Our algorithm guarantees that the number of groups is at most $2n/k+1$ after convergence. We also give a novel composition technique to concatenate a silent algorithm repeatedly, which we call loop composition., Comment: This is a revised version of the conference paper [6], which appears in the proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking (ICDCN), ACM, 2017. This revised version slightly generalize Theorem 1

This paper shows that every leader election protocol requires logarithmic stabilization time both in expectation and with high probability in the population protocol model. This lower bound holds even if each agent has knowledge of the exact size of a population and is allowed to use an arbitrarily large number of agent states. This lower bound concludes that the protocol given in [Sudo et al., SSS 2019] is time-optimal in expectation.

An effective atomic cross-chain swap protocol is introduced by Herlihy [Herlihy, 2018] as a distributed coordination protocol in order to exchange assets across multiple blockchains among multiple parties. An atomic cross-chain swap protocol guarantees; (1) if all parties conform to the protocol, then all assets are exchanged among parties, (2) even if some parties or coalitions of parties deviate from the protocol, no party conforming to the protocol suffers a loss, and (3) no coalition has an incentive to deviate from the protocol. Herlihy [Herlihy, 2018] invented this protocol by using hashed timelock contracts. A cross-chain swap is modeled as a directed graph D = (V,A). Vertex set V denotes a set of parties and arc set A denotes a set of proposed asset transfers. Herlihy's protocol uses the graph topology and signature information to set appropriate hashed timelock contracts. The space complexity of the protocol (i.e., the total number of bits written in the blockchains in a swap) is O(|A|^2). The local time complexity of the protocol (i.e., the maximum execution time of a contract in a swap to transfer the corresponding asset) is O(|V||L|), where L is a feedback vertex set computed by the protocol. We propose a new atomic cross-chain swap protocol which uses only signature information and improves the space complexity to O(|A||V|) and the local time complexity to O(|V|).

In this paper, the leader election problem in the population protocol model is considered. A leader election protocol with logarithmic stabilization time is given. Given a rough knowledge m of the population size n such that m >= \log_2 n and m=O(log n), the proposed protocol guarantees that exactly one leader is elected from n agents within O(log n) parallel time in expectation and the unique leader is kept forever thereafter. The number of states per agent of the protocol is O(log n)., Comment: 16 pages

We consider the problem of aggregating data in a dynamic graph, that is, aggregating the data that originates from all nodes in the graph to a specific node, the sink. We are interested in giving lower bounds for this problem, under different kinds of adversaries. In our model, nodes are endowed with unlimited memory and unlimited computational power. Yet, we assume that communications between nodes are carried out with pairwise interactions, where nodes can exchange control information before deciding whether they transmit their data or not, given that each node is allowed to transmit its data at most once. When a node receives a data from a neighbor, the node may aggregate it with its own data. We consider three possible adversaries: the online adaptive adversary, the oblivious adversary , and the randomized adversary that chooses the pairwise interactions uniformly at random. For the online adaptive and the oblivious adversary, we give impossibility results when nodes have no knowledge about the graph and are not aware of the future. Also, we give several tight bounds depending on the knowledge (be it topology related or time related) of the nodes. For the randomized adversary, we show that the Gathering algorithm, which always commands a node to transmit, is optimal if nodes have no knowledge at all. Also, we propose an algorithm called Waiting Greedy, where a node either waits or transmits depending on some parameter, that is optimal when each node knows its future pairwise interactions with the sink.

This paper demonstrates the usefulness of distributed local verification of proofs, as a tool for the design of self-stabilizing algorithms.In particular, it introduces a somewhat generalized notion of distributed local proofs, and utilizes it for improving the time complexity significantly, while maintaining space optimality. As a result, we show that optimizing the memory size carries at most a small cost in terms of time, in the context of Minimum Spanning Tree (MST). That is, we present algorithms that are both time and space efficient for both constructing an MST and for verifying it.This involves several parts that may be considered contributions in themselves.First, we generalize the notion of local proofs, trading off the time complexity for memory efficiency. This adds a dimension to the study of distributed local proofs, which has been gaining attention recently. Specifically, we design a (self-stabilizing) proof labeling scheme which is memory optimal (i.e., $O(\log n)$ bits per node), and whose time complexity is $O(\log ^2 n)$ in synchronous networks, or $O(\Delta \log ^3 n)$ time in asynchronous ones, where $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of nodes. This answers an open problem posed by Awerbuch and Varghese (FOCS 1991). We also show that $\Omega(\log n)$ time is necessary, even in synchronous networks. Another property is that if $f$ faults occurred, then, within the requireddetection time above, they are detected by some node in the $O(f\log n)$ locality of each of the faults.Second, we show how to enhance a known transformer that makes input/output algorithms self-stabilizing. It now takes as input an efficient construction algorithm and an efficient self-stabilizing proof labeling scheme, and produces an efficient self-stabilizing algorithm. When used for MST, the transformer produces a memory optimal self-stabilizing algorithm, whose time complexity, namely, $O(n)$, is significantly better even than that of previous algorithms. (The time complexity of previous MST algorithms that used $\Omega(\log^2 n)$ memory bits per node was $O(n^2)$, and the time for optimal space algorithms was $O(n|E|)$.) Inherited from our proof labelling scheme, our self-stabilising MST construction algorithm also has the following two properties: (1) if faults occur after the construction ended, then they are detected by some nodes within $O(\log ^2 n)$ time in synchronous networks, or within $O(\Delta \log ^3 n)$ time in asynchronous ones, and (2) if $f$ faults occurred, then, within the required detection time above, they are detected within the $O(f\log n)$ locality of each of the faults. We also show how to improve the above two properties, at the expense of some increase in the memory.

In this paper, we consider the partial gathering problem of mobile agents in asynchronous unidirectional rings equipped with whiteboards on nodes. The partial gathering problem is a new generalization of the total gathering problem. The partial gathering problem requires, for a given integer $g$, that each agent should move to a node and terminate so that at least $g$ agents should meet at the same node. The requirement for the partial gathering problem is weaker than that for the (well-investigated) total gathering problem, and thus, we have interests in clarifying the difference on the move complexity between them. We propose three algorithms to solve the partial gathering problem. The first algorithm is deterministic but requires unique ID of each agent. This algorithm achieves the partial gathering in $O(gn)$ total moves, where $n$ is the number of nodes. The second algorithm is randomized and requires no unique ID of each agent (i.e., anonymous). This algorithm achieves the partial gathering in expected $O(gn)$ total moves. The third algorithm is deterministic and requires no unique ID of each agent. For this case, we show that there exist initial configurations in which no algorithm can solve the problem and agents can achieve the partial gathering in $O(kn)$ total moves for solvable initial configurations, where $k$ is the number of agents. Note that the total gathering problem requires $\Omega (kn)$ total moves, while the partial gathering problem requires $\Omega (gn)$ total moves in each model. Hence, we show that the move complexity of the first and second algorithms is asymptotically optimal.

Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. This paper focus on systems that are both self-stabilizing and Byzantine tolerant. We consider the well known problem of constructing a maximum metric tree in this context. Combining these two properties is known to induce many impossibility results. In this paper, we provide first two impossibility results about the construction of maximum metric tree in presence of transients and (permanent) Byzantine faults. Then, we provide a new self-stabilizing protocol that provides optimal containment of an arbitrary number of Byzantine faults.

A self-stabilizing is naturally resilient to transients faults (that is, faults of finite duration). Recently, a new class of protocol appears. These protocols are self-stabilizing and are moreover resilient to a limited number of permanent faults. In this article, we interest in self-stabilizing protocols that tolerate very hard permanent faults: Byzantine faults. We introduce two new scheme of Byzantine containment in self-stabilizing systems. We show that, for the problem of BFS spanning tree construction, the well known self-stabilizing protocol min+1 provides without significant modification the best Byzantine containment with respect to these new schemes., Comment: 13es Rencontres Francophones sur les Aspects Algorithmiques de T\'el\'ecommunications (AlgoTel) (2011)

Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. We consider the well known problem of constructing a maximum metric tree in this context. Combining these two properties leads to some impossibility results. In this paper, we provide two necessary conditions to construct maximum metric tree in presence of transients and (permanent) Byzantine faults.

Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. We consider the well known problem of constructing a breadth-first spanning tree in this context. Combining these two properties proves difficult: we demonstrate that it is impossible to contain the impact of Byzantine nodes in a strictly or strongly stabilizing manner. We then adopt the weaker scheme of topology-aware strict stabilization and we present a similar weakening of strong stabilization. We prove that the classical $min+1$ protocol has optimal Byzantine containment properties with respect to these criteria.

Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. Combining these two properties proved difficult: it is impossible to contain the spatial impact of Byzantine nodes in a self-stabilizing context for global tasks such as tree orientation and tree construction. We present and illustrate a new concept of Byzantine containment in stabilization. Our property, called Strong Stabilization enables to contain the impact of Byzantine nodes if they actually perform too many Byzantine actions. We derive impossibility results for strong stabilization and present strongly stabilizing protocols for tree orientation and tree construction that are optimal with respect to the number of Byzantine nodes that can be tolerated in a self-stabilizing context.

Self-stabilization is an versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed system that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. We consider the well known problem of constructing a maximum metric tree in this context. Combining these two properties prove difficult: we demonstrate that it is impossible to contain the impact of Byzantine nodes in a self-stabilizing context for maximum metric tree construction (strict stabilization). We propose a weaker containment scheme called topology-aware strict stabilization, and present a protocol for computing maximum metric trees that is optimal for this scheme with respect to impossibility result.