Search

Background: Plasma exchange (PE) is the first-line therapy of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Several plasma preparations have been available; their equivalence in terms of outcome remains uncertain., Study Design and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the cases prospectively reported from 2005 to 2010 to the national registry established by the thrombotic microangiopathies French reference center. We analyzed 108 initial episodes of acquired idiopathic TTP in adults treated with PE, 81 with solvent/detergent (S/D) plasma, and 27 with quarantine fresh-frozen plasma (qFFP). The primary endpoint was the time to platelet (PLT) count recovery., Results: Time to PLT count recovery was not significantly different with S/D plasma versus qFFP (median, 15 days vs. 19 days, respectively; p = 0.126). Complete remission rates, exacerbations, and survival were comparable. By multivariate competitive risk (Fine-Gray) analysis, the only significant association with a shorter time to PLT count recovery was the absence of additional treatment (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-3.05; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between type of plasma and age, and for patients less than 40 years old, the use of S/D plasma was associated with a shorter time to PLT count recovery versus qFFP (median, 13 [95% CI, 9-16] days vs. 20 [95% CI, 16-64] days, respectively; p = 0.004)., Conclusion: The outcomes of acquired TTP treated with S/D plasma or qFFP seem similar and therefore both preparations can be used safely for PE in this indication. The faster response of S/D plasma observed in younger patients warrants confirmation in prospective studies., (© 2015 AABB.)

Background: The ACVBP regimen is an efficient induction regimen for poor-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) before consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. Adjunction of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (R-ACVBP) was recently found to be superior to ACVBP alone. This study assessed the impact of rituximab on stem cell mobilization in two similar consecutive groups of patients treated with ACVBP in two prospective, controlled trials., Study Design and Methods: The first trial (LNH-98B-3) involved 137 patients treated with ACVBP alone. In the second trial (LNH-03-3B), 91 patients received an R-ACVBP regimen. Stem cell mobilization was performed after a course of (R)-ACVBP., Results: The median peak numbers of blood CD34+ cell counts recorded before the first apheresis procedure in the ACVBP and R-ACVBP groups were 69×10(6) and 63×10(6) /L, respectively (p=0.55). The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected were 7.1×10(6) and 6.0×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg for the ACVBP and R-ACVBP groups, respectively (p=0.13). The median number of apheresis procedures required for gathering the minimum amount of CD34+ cells (2×10(6) /kg) was the same in the two groups., Conclusion: When compared with ACVBP alone, adjunction of rituximab does not impair stem cell mobilization., (© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.)

Background: The short-term effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) have been extensively studied, but recent reports of G-CSF-induced genetic perturbations raised concerns regarding its long-term safety. In this respect, duration of G-CSF-induced perturbations has been less studied than short-term effects and needs to be evaluated., Study Design and Methods: G-CSF mobilization-induced immunologic alterations were prospectively analyzed in a cohort of 24 healthy donors. Blood samples were taken before G-CSF administration; at the time of administration; and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and analyzed for blood cell counts and in vitro cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2, -8, and -10) and immunoglobulin production, quantified in the culture supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) after, respectively, phytohemagglutinin and pokeweed mitogen stimulation., Results: Platelet, granulocyte, monocyte, B, and dendritic blood cell counts as well as the IL-2, -8, and -10 secretion by PBMNCs, perturbed at the time of G-CSF mobilization, returned to baseline values at 1 month, with T-cell and natural killer cell counts recovering at 3 months. In vitro immunoglobulin production was increased up to 6 months after mobilization., Conclusion: Although assessment of the potential long-term risk of G-CSF administration will require prolonged observation of larger cohorts, our data show that the duration of immunologic perturbations may be more persistent than previously anticipated, especially for B-cell functional alterations. Most perturbations remain, however, transient with a return to baseline values within 1 year., (© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.)