Search

Background: Renal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions., Objective: The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method., Results and Limitations: The median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4-55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5-55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature., Conclusions: Our results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations., Patient Summary: Renal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity has been associated with improved response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. We investigated the role of body mass index (BMI) in patients from the ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) treated by dual immuno-oncology agents (IO+IO) or a combination of immuno-oncology drug and a tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with documented mRCC treated by immuno-oncology combinations were reviewed at 47 institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (OS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB), defined as the sum of the rate of partial/complete responses and stable disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with survival., Results: A total of 675 patients were included; BMI was >25 kg/m 2 in 345 patients (51%) and was associated with improved OS (55.7 vs. 28.4 months, P < .001). The OCB of patients with BMI >25 kg/m 2 versus those with BMI ≤25 kg/m 2 was significantly higher only in patients with nonclear cell histology (81% vs. 65%, P = .011), and patients with liver metastases (76% vs. 58%, P = .007), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >4 (77% vs 62%, P = .022) or treated by nivolumab plus ipilimumab (77% vs. 64%, P = .044). In the BMI ≤25 kg/m 2 subgroup, significant differences were found between patients with NLR >4 versus ≤4 (62% vs. 82%, P = .002) and patients treated by IO+IO versus IO+TKIs combinations (64% vs. 83%, P = .002)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that the prognostic significance and the association of BMI with treatment outcome varies across clinico-pathological mRCC subgroups., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The upfront treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune-based combinations. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in these patients is still debated. The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally analyze real-world data of mRCC patients receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. This sub-analysis is focused on the role of upfront or delayed partial or radical CN in three geographical areas (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, America/Asia)., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combinations from 55 centers in 19 countries. From 1152 patients in the ARON-1 dataset, we selected 651 patients with de novo mRCC. 255 patients (39%) had undergone CN, partial in 14% and radical in 86% of cases; 396 patients (61%) received first-line immune-combinations without previous nephrectomy., Results: Median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of de novo mRCC was 41.6 months and not reached (NR) in the CN subgroup and 24.0 months in the no CN subgroup, respectively (P<0.001). Median OS from the start of first-line therapy was NR in patients who underwent CN and 22.4 months in the no CN subgroup (P<0.001). Patients who underwent CN reported longer OS compared to no CN in all the three geographical areas., Conclusions: No significant differences in terms of patients' outcome seem to clearly emerge, even if the rate CN and the choice of the type of first-line immune-based combination varies across the different Cancer Centers participating in the ARON-1 project.

Background: Immuno-oncology combinations have achieved survival benefits in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally collect real-world data on the use of immuno-combinations as first-line therapy for mRCC patients., Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a cytologically and/or histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC treated with first-line immuno-combination therapies were retrospectively included from 47 International Institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB)., Results: A total of 729 patients were included; tumor histology was clear-cell RCC in 86% of cases; 313 patients received dual immuno-oncology (IO + IO) therapy while 416 were treated with IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO + TKI) combinations. In the overall study population, the median OS and PFS were 36.5 and 15.0 months, respectively. The median OS was longer with IO+TKI compared with IO+IO therapy in the 616 patients with intermediate/poor International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria (55.7 vs 29.7 months; p = 0.045). OCB was 84% for IO+TKI and 72% for IO + IO combination (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study may suggest that immuno-oncology combinations are effective as first-line therapy in the mRCC real-world context, showing outcome differences between IO + IO and IO + TKI combinations in mRCC subpopulations., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05287464., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity after resin Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients using the Bolondi subgroup classification., Methods: A total of 144 BCLC B patients were treated between 2015-2020. Patients were broken into 4 subgroups by tumor burden/liver function tests with 54, 59, 8 and 23 in subgroups 1, 2, 3 and 4. OS and PFS were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5., Results: Prior resection and chemoembolization were performed in 19 (13%) and 34 (24%) of patients. There were no deaths within 30 days. Median OS and PFS for the cohort were 21.5 and 12.4 months. Median OS was not reached for subgroup 1 at a mean 28.8 months, and was 24.9, 11.0 and 14.6 months for subgroups 2-4 (χ 2 =19.8, P=0.0002). PFS by BCLC B subgroup was 13.8, 12.4, 4.5, and 6.6 months (χ 2 =16.8, P=0.0008). The most common Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were elevated bilirubin (n=16, 13.3%) and decreased albumin (n=15, 12.5%). Grade 3 or greater bilirubin (32% vs . 10%, P=0.03) and albumin (26% vs . 10%, P=0.03) toxicity were more common in the subgroup 4 patients., Conclusions: The Bolondi subgroup classification stratifies OS, PFS and development of toxicity in patients treated with resin Y-90 microspheres. OS in subgroup 1 approaches 2.5 years and Grade 3 or greater hepatic toxicity profile in subgroups 1-3 is low., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-22-972/coif). All authors report that the study was supported by Sirtex Medical. RTG is a consultant and speaker for Sirtex Medical and serves as a proctor for Sirtex Medical. Sirtex Medical has funded travel related to these roles. ZSC has received an institutional research grant from Sirtex Medical and serves as a speaker and consultant for Sirtex Medical. JSB is a consultant for Sirtex Medical. DYS has received institutional research grants from Sirtex Medical. He is a consultant and has received support for travel/hotel/meals for meetings with Sirtex Medical. ASK has received institutional support from Sirtex Medical, Bard Medical and ABK Biomedical. JG is a consultant for Sirtex Medical and Boston Scientific. He has also received institutional grant support from Sirtex Medical. EAW is a proctor for Sirtex Medical. DBB has received institutional research support from Sirtex Medical and Guerbet. He has served as a speaker for Cook Medical and a Data Safety Monitor for Bard Medical. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 (collectively PD-[L]1) therapies are approved for many advanced solid tumors. Biomarkers beyond PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutation burden (TMB) may improve benefit prediction., Methods: Using treatment data and genomic and transcriptomic tumor tissue profiling from an observational trial (NCT03061305), we developed Immunotherapy Response Score (IRS), a pan-tumor predictive model of PD-(L)1 benefit. IRS real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) prediction was validated in an independent cohort of trial patients., Results: Here, by Cox modeling, we develop IRS-which combines TMB with CD274, PDCD1, ADAM12 and TOP2A quantitative expression-to predict pembrolizumab rwPFS (648 patients; 26 tumor types; IRS-High or -Low groups). In the 248 patient validation cohort (248 patients; 24 tumor types; non-pembrolizumab PD-[L]1 monotherapy treatment), median rwPFS and OS are significantly longer in IRS-High vs. IRS-Low patients (rwPFS adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.52, p = 0.003; OS aHR 0.49, p = 0.005); TMB alone does not significantly predict PD-(L)1 rwPFS nor OS. In 146 patients treated with systemic therapy prior to pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab rwPFS is only significantly longer than immediately preceding therapy rwPFS in IRS-High patients (interaction test p = 0.001). In propensity matched lung cancer patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab+chemotherapy, monotherapy rwPFS is significantly shorter in IRS-Low patients, but is not significantly different in IRS-High patients. Across 24,463 molecularly-evaluable trial patients, 7.6% of patients outside of monotherapy PD-(L)1 approved tumor types are IRS-High/TMB-Low., Conclusions: The validated, predictive, pan-tumor IRS model can expand PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit outside currently approved indications., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: National Comprehensive Cancer Network HCC guidelines recommend Y90 to treat BCLC-C patients only in select cases given the development of systemic regimens. We sought to identify ideal candidates for Y90 by assessing survival and toxicities in this patient group., Materials and Methods: The Radiation-Emitting Selective Internal radiation spheres in Non-resectable tumor registry is a prospective observational study (NCT: 02,685,631). Patients with advanced HCC were stratified into 3 groups based on tumor location, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and liver function. Group 1: liver isolated HCC, ECOG 0 and Child Pugh (CP) A (n = 12, 16%), Group 2: liver isolated HCC, ECOG ≥ 1 or CP B/C (n = 37, 49%), and Group 3: extrahepatic HCC with any ECOG or CP score (n = 26, 35%). Patients in any group could have macrovascular invasion. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Grade 3 + toxicities were tracked using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to determine factors affecting OS., Results: Seventy-five BCLC-C patients treated between 2015 and 2019 were reviewed. The groups were similar in age, sex, race, and ethnicity (all p > 0.05). Bilobar disease was least common in Group 1 (p < 0.001). Median OS of the entire cohort was 13.6 (95% CI 7.5-16.1) months. Median OS of Groups 1-3 were 21.8, 13.1 and 11.5 months respectively (p = 0.6). Median PFS for the cohort was 6.3 (4.8-14.7) months. Median PFS for group 1 was not reached. Mean PFS for Group 1 was 17.3 ± 4.8 months. Median PFS for Groups 2 and 3 was 6.8 and 5.9 months (X 2  = 1.5, p = 0.5). Twenty-four Grade 3 or greater toxicities developed, most commonly hyperbilirubinemia (8/75, 11%) and thrombocytopenia (2/75, 3%). The incidence of toxicities between groups was similar (all p > 0.05). Cox Proportional Hazard analysis predicted shorter OS with CP class B/C (X 2  = 6.7, p = 0.01), while macrovascular invasion (X 2  = 0.5, p = 0.5) and ECOG score of ≥ 1 (X 2  = 2.1, p = 0.3) was not associated with OS., Conclusions: OS of CPA patients with advanced HCC and performance status of 0 was 21.8 months following Y90. CP A cirrhosis is the best predictor of prolonged OS in advanced (BCLC-C) HCC., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: A subset of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), deemed as primary refractory, shows progressive disease as the best response to first-line therapy even when treated with novel immune-based combos., Objective: We aimed to assess the outcome of patients treated with second-line cabozantinib for mRCC primary refractory to first-line therapy defined as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) progression in the computed tomography scan as the best response to the upfront treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively collected data from 11 worldwide centers., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses., Results and Limitations: We collected data from 108 patients with mRCC primary refractory to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (17%), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (36%), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 31% sunitinib and 16% pazopanib). The median OS with cabozantinib was 9.11 mo, and it was 8.84 and 9.11 mo in patients primary refractory to immunocombinations and TKIs, respectively (p = 0.952). A significant difference was found between patients primary refractory to pembrolizumab plus axitinib (OS not reached) and those primary refractory to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (median OS 8.12 mo, p = 0.024). The median PFS with cabozantinib was 7.30 mo, without significant differences between patients primary refractory to immunocombinations and those primary refractory to TKIs (6.90 vs 7.59 mo, p = 0.435) or between patients primary refractory to pembrolizumab plus axitinib and those primary refractory to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (7.92 and 6.02, p = 0.509). Investigator-assessed overall response rates were 21% and 12% in patients primary refractory to first-line immunocombinations and TKIs, respectively, with a clinical benefit of 48% in the overall population., Conclusions: Our data show that cabozantinib is active in primary refractory mRCC patients regardless of which treatment is received as first-line therapy. Systemic options and prognosis of primary refractory patients with mRCC, particularly those treated with novel immune-based combos, are among the major challenges that we need to face in this field., Patient Summary: Patients primary refractory to first-line therapy are characterized by a poor prognosis. Herein, we aimed to assess the outcome of patients treated with second-line cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) primary refractory to first-line therapy. Our results suggest that cabozantinib is active in primary refractory mRCC patients., (Copyright © 2022 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Statins are widely used in an ageing population, including subjects with solid malignancies. However, no conclusive evidence is currently available on their potential influence on patients' outcome. We aimed to assess whether statin exposure affects the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab., Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with documented mRCC treated with second- or third-line nivolumab were reviewed at ten institutions from Italy, Spain and the USA. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall clinical benefit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with survival., Results: A total of 219 patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab between January 2016 and September 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this study; 59 (27%) were statin users. The median OS (34.4 versus 18.6 months, p = 0.017) and PFS (11.7 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.013) resulted apparently longer in statin users. Stratified by age, longer median OS and PFS were associated with statin exposure in both patients aged ≥70 y (median OS: 21.4 versus 10.1 months, p = 0.047; median PFS: 16.4 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.022) and &lt;70 y (median OS: 34.4 versus 21.4 months, p = 0.043; median PFS: 10.3 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.042). Overall clinical benefit resulted higher in statin users than non-users (71% versus 54%, p = 0.030)., Conclusions: Our study suggests a prognostic impact of statin use in patients receiving nivolumab for mRCC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare to have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Drug-drug interactions are a major concern in oncology and may potentially affect the outcome of patients with cancer., Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine whether the concomitant use of statins, metformin, or proton pump inhibitors affects survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line combination therapies., Methods: Medical records of patients with documented metastatic renal cell carcinoma between January 2016 and November 2021 were reviewed at 17 participating centers. This research was conducted in ten institutions, including both referral centers and local hospitals. Patients were assessed for overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall clinical benefit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the association of variables of interest with overall survival and progression-free survival., Results: A total of 304 patients receiving dual immunotherapy (51%) or immunotherapy/vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (49%) combinations were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Statin use was a significant prognostic factor for longer overall survival in a univariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.87; p = 0.016) and a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.74; p < 0.001) and was significantly associated with an overall clinical benefit (83% in statin users vs 71% in non-users; p = 0.045). Otherwise, the use of metformin or proton pump inhibitors did not affect the outcome of these patients., Conclusions: Our study suggests a prognostic impact of statin use in patients receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in specific mRCC subpopulations., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 11 centers from Italy, Spain and US. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: We collected data from 343 patients with mRCC, 123 (36%) treated with cabozantinib and 220 (64%) with nivolumab. The median OS resulted longer, but not statistically significant, with nivolumab in patients aged >70 years (21.4 vs. 15.4 months, P = .746), treated with first-line pazopanib (26.8 vs. 11.6 months, P = .450), or with good (47.0 vs. 15.5 months, P = .285) or intermediate-risk criteria (14.4 vs. 11.0 months, P = .357), while it was longer, but even not statistically significant, for cabozantinib in patients who received previous sunitinib (25.7 vs. 21.7 months, P = .638) or with bone metastases (28.4 vs. 24.4 months, P = .871). The median PFS was significantly longer with cabozantinib in patients with clear cell histology (7.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = .026) and in patients with good risk features (12.3 vs. 5.7 months, P = .022)., Conclusions: Nivolumab and cabozantinib resulted active in mRCC patients, showing distinct results when stratified into clinico-pathological features., Competing Interests: Disclosure EG has received honoraria for speaker engagements, advisory roles or funding of continuous medical education from Adacap, AMGEN, Angelini, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caris Life Sciences, Celgene, Clovis-Oncology, Eisai, Eusa Pharma, Genetracer, Guardant Health, HRA-Pharma, IPSEN, ITM-Radiopharma, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, Merck KGaA, MSD, Nanostring Technologies, Natera, Novartis, ONCODNA (Biosequence), Palex, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Servier, Taiho, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. EG has received research grants from Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare to have no conflicts of interest. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The primary endpoint of MOUSEION-01 was to assess overall survival (OS) in male and female patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors versus control treatments, calculating the pooled OS Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) in both groups. 37 randomized phase III studies and 22646 patients (16382 men and 6264 women) were included. In patients treated with immunotherapy (as monotherapy or in combination with other agents), the pooled OS HR was 0.78 (0.75-0.82) and 0.77 (95 % CI, 0.72-0.83) in male and female subjects, respectively. The pooled HR for OS in male patients treated with single-agent immunotherapy versus control was 0.77 (95 % CI, 0.70-0.85), while this benefit was smaller in female patients (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.73-0.9). Our findings highlight that high-quality trials accounting for potential confounders are needed before being able to suggest a real effect of the patient's gender on immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in different settings., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent the standard of care as first- or second-line treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide and are known to affect gut microbiota, which is gaining interest in its association with outcomes for patients on ICIs., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PPIs on outcomes in RCC patients receiving immunotherapy., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients with metastatic RCC who received the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab for first-line treatment (Cohort 1) or single-agent nivolumab for second-line or third-line treatment (Cohort 2) from five international centers with expertise in the treatment of RCC. Data about clinicopathological characteristics, PPI use, and outcome on ICIs were collected. Endpoints of the study were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Two hundred and eighteen patients (71% male, median age 61 years) were included in the analysis, 62 in Cohort 1 (including 25 patients receiving PPIs) and 156 in Cohort 2 (including 88 patients receiving PPIs), and were followed up for a median of 42 months. In Cohort 1, no difference was observed in ORR (48% vs 57%; p = 0.203), PFS (12.2 vs 8.5 months; p = 0.928), or OS (not reached [NR] vs 27.3 months; p = 0.84). In Cohort 2, no difference was observed in ORR (32% vs 28%; p = 0.538), PFS (6.7 vs 9.0 months; p = 0.799), or OS (16.0 vs 26.0 months; p = 0.324)., Conclusions: In patients with RCC, concomitant PPI use did not seem to affect survival outcomes on ICIs, either as combination therapy or monotherapy., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation is a highly aggressive form of kidney cancer., Objective: We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 16 worldwide centers. Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: We collected data from 66 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma receiving cabozantinib as second-line (51%) or third-line (49%) therapy. The median progression-free survival from the start of cabozantinib was 7.59 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.75-17.49) and was longer in male patients (8.81 vs 5.95 months, p = 0.042) and in patients without bone metastases (7.59 vs 5.11 months, p = 0.010); the median overall survival was 9.11 months (95% CI 7.13-23.80). At the multivariate analysis, female sex (hazard ratio = 1.81; 95% CI 1.02-3.37, p = 0.046), bone metastases (hazard ratio = 2.62; 95% CI 1.34-5.10, p = 0.005), and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria (hazard ratio = 3.04; 95% CI 1.54-5.99, p = 0.001) were significant predictors of worse overall survival., Conclusions: Our data show that cabozantinib is active in pretreated patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Biomarkers are needed in this field to select patients for multi-kinase inhibitors or other options., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for treatment selection in patients with advanced cancer; however, tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here, we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecutively received samples., Materials and Methods: We conducted a post hoc, nonprespecified analysis of 32,048 consecutive tumor tissue samples received for StrataNGS, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based comprehensive genomic profiling (PCR-CGP) test, as part of an ongoing observational trial (NCT03061305). Sample characteristics and PCR-CGP performance were assessed across all tested samples, including exception samples not meeting minimum input quality control (QC) requirements (< 20% tumor content [TC], < 2 mm 2 tumor surface area [TSA], DNA or RNA yield < 1 ng/µL, or specimen age > 5 years). Tests reporting ≥ 1 prioritized alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered successful. For prostate carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, tests reporting ≥ 1 actionable or informative alteration or meeting TC and sequencing QC were considered actionable., Results: Among 31,165 (97.2%) samples where PCR-CGP was attempted, 10.7% had < 20% TC and 59.2% were small (< 25 mm 2 tumor surface area). Of 31,101 samples evaluable for input requirements, 8,089 (26.0%) were exceptions not meeting requirements. However, 94.2% of the 31,101 tested samples were successfully reported, including 80.5% of exception samples. Positive predictive value of PCR-CGP for ERBB2 amplification in exceptions and/or sequencing QC-failure breast cancer samples was 96.7%. Importantly, 84.0% of tested prostate carcinomas and 87.9% of lung adenocarcinomas yielded results informing treatment selection., Conclusion: Most real-world tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer desiring CGP are limited, requiring optimized CGP approaches to produce meaningful results. An optimized PCR-CGP test, coupled with an inclusive exception testing policy, delivered reportable results for > 94% of samples, potentially expanding the proportion of CGP-testable patients and impact of biomarker-guided therapies., Competing Interests: Scott A. Tomlins Employment: Strata Oncology Leadership: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Astellas Medivation, Strata Oncology Research Funding: Astellas Medivation Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am a coinventor on a patent issued to the University of Michigan on ETS gene fusions in prostate and am included in the royalty stream. The diagnostic field of use was licensed to Hologic/Gen-Probe (who sublicensed some rights to Ventana/Roche) and is licensed to LynxDx. I am a coinventor on a patent issued to Strata Oncology related to MSI determination and checkpoint inhibitor benefit Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Strata Oncology, Genzyme Daniel H. Hovelson Employment: Strata Oncology Elizabeth C. Dees Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Strata Oncology, G1 Therapeutics Research Funding: Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Merck, H3 Biomedicine, Meryx Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: G1 Therapeutics Mark E. Burkard Consulting or Advisory Role: Pointcare genomics, Strata Oncology, Novartis Research Funding: AbbVie, Strata Oncology, Puma Biotechnology, Loxo, Merck, Arcus Ventures, Apollomics, Elevation Oncology, Genentech Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have a patent for implantable/localized drug delivery device that can sample the tumor microenvironment and deliver drug, I have a patent for a method to detect recombination events with CRISPR-mediated editing, and I have a patent for conducting expansion microscopy without specialized equipment Michael Guarino Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: McKesson, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BMS, De Novo Pharmaceuticals Marc R. Matrana Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology Speakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck, Eisai, Genentech, Janssen, Exelixis Eddy S. Yang Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Lilly Research Funding: Lilly, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, Puma Biotechnology Benjamin M. Parsons Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca Speakers' Bureau: Amgen, Celgene, AstraZeneca Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/795031 Michael A. Thompson Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Doximity Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, VIA Oncology, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Strata Oncology, Syapse, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AbbVie, GRAIL, Epizyme, Janssen Oncology Research Funding: Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, TG Therapeutics, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, AbbVie, PrECOG, Strata Oncology, Lynx Biosciences, Denovo Biopharma, ARMO BioSciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate, Peer Review for Plasma Cell Dyscrasias (Editor: Robert Kyle) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Syapse Other Relationship: Doximity Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/192826/summary William J. Edenfield Consulting or Advisory Role: Chimerix Suresh Nair Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Moderna Therapeutics, Novavax, Biontech, Gilead Sciences Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Nektar Adedayo Onitilo Consulting or Advisory Role: Kite, a Gilead company, Envision Communications Speakers' Bureau: GlaxoSmithKline, Puma Biotechnology, Kite/Gilead, AbbVie Robert Siegel Research Funding: Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, GRAIL, Altor BioScience, Galera Therapeutics, Apollomics, Strata Oncology, Arcus Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cancer Insight, Puma Biotechnology, Conjupro Biotherapeutics, Razor Genomics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics Other Relationship: American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) William J. Irvin Research Funding: Merck, Altor BioScience, Odonate Therapeutics, Boston Biomedical, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Altor BioScience, AstraZeneca Arvinda Padmanabhan Speakers' Bureau: Clovis Oncology, Roche Anneliese Gonzalez Research Funding: Novartis, Radius Health, Astellas Pharma Paul Harms Research Funding: Q32 Bio Jennifer Hipp Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology Consulting or Advisory Role: PathAI Kat Kwiatkowski Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Epizyme, Loxo, Editas Medicine, Intuitive Surgical Khalis Mitchell Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati Therapeutics Javed Siddiqui Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology, LynxDx Hana Vakil Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology D. Bryan Johnson Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology Daniel R. Rhodes Employment: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Leadership: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am paid royalties from the University of Michigan on license revenues related to a patent on prostate cancer gene fusions No other potential conflicts of interest were reported. Scott A. Tomlins Employment: Strata Oncology Leadership: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Consulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Astellas Medivation, Strata Oncology Research Funding: Astellas Medivation Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am a coinventor on a patent issued to the University of Michigan on ETS gene fusions in prostate and am included in the royalty stream. The diagnostic field of use was licensed to Hologic/Gen-Probe (who sublicensed some rights to Ventana/Roche) and is licensed to LynxDx. I am a coinventor on a patent issued to Strata Oncology related to MSI determination and checkpoint inhibitor benefit Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Strata Oncology, Genzyme Daniel H. Hovelson Employment: Strata Oncology Elizabeth C. Dees Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Strata Oncology, G1 Therapeutics Research Funding: Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Merck, H3 Biomedicine, Meryx Pharmaceuticals Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: G1 Therapeutics Mark E. Burkard Consulting or Advisory Role: Pointcare genomics, Strata Oncology, Novartis Research Funding: AbbVie, Strata Oncology, Puma Biotechnology, Loxo, Merck, Arcus Ventures, Apollomics, Elevation Oncology, Genentech Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have a patent for implantable/localized drug delivery device that can sample the tumor microenvironment and deliver drug, I have a patent for a method to detect recombination events with CRISPR-mediated editing, and I have a patent for conducting expansion microscopy without specialized equipment Michael Guarino Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: McKesson, ARMO BioSciences, AstraZeneca, BMS, De Novo Pharmaceuticals Marc R. Matrana Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology Speakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck, Eisai, Genentech, Janssen, Exelixis Eddy S. Yang Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, Lilly Research Funding: Lilly, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, Puma Biotechnology Benjamin M. Parsons Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Amgen, AstraZeneca Speakers' Bureau: Amgen, Celgene, AstraZeneca Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/795031 Michael A. Thompson Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Doximity Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, VIA Oncology, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Strata Oncology, Syapse, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AbbVie, GRAIL, Epizyme, Janssen Oncology Research Funding: Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, TG Therapeutics, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, AbbVie, PrECOG, Strata Oncology, Lynx Biosciences, Denovo Biopharma, ARMO BioSciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate, Peer Review for Plasma Cell Dyscrasias (Editor: Robert Kyle) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Syapse Other Relationship: Doximity Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/192826/summary William J. Edenfield Consulting or Advisory Role: Chimerix Suresh Nair Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Moderna Therapeutics, Novavax, Biontech, Gilead Sciences Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Nektar Adedayo Onitilo Consulting or Advisory Role: Kite, a Gilead company, Envision Communications Speakers' Bureau: GlaxoSmithKline, Puma Biotechnology, Kite/Gilead, AbbVie Robert Siegel Research Funding: Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, GRAIL, Altor BioScience, Galera Therapeutics, Apollomics, Strata Oncology, Arcus Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cancer Insight, Puma Biotechnology, Conjupro Biotherapeutics, Razor Genomics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics Other Relationship: American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) William J. Irvin Research Funding: Merck, Altor BioScience, Odonate Therapeutics, Boston Biomedical, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Altor BioScience, AstraZeneca Arvinda Padmanabhan Speakers' Bureau: Clovis Oncology, Roche Anneliese Gonzalez Research Funding: Novartis, Radius Health, Astellas Pharma Paul Harms Research Funding: Q32 Bio Jennifer Hipp Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology Consulting or Advisory Role: PathAI Kat Kwiatkowski Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Epizyme, Loxo, Editas Medicine, Intuitive Surgical Khalis Mitchell Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati Therapeutics Javed Siddiqui Consulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology, LynxDx Hana Vakil Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology D. Bryan Johnson Employment: Strata Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology Daniel R. Rhodes Employment: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Leadership: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Strata Oncology, Javelin Oncology Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am paid royalties from the University of Michigan on license revenues related to a patent on prostate cancer gene fusions No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of immune-related adverse effect (irAE) management, as well as for other indications in cancer treatment. Previous studies evaluating whether CS affect immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) efficacy compared patients receiving CS versus no CS. However, there is a paucity of clinical data evaluating the timing of concomitant CS and CPI efficacy., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients who received CS during CPI treatment at a single institution. Patients were in two cohorts based on timing of initiation of CS (≥2 months vs <2 months after initiating CPI). Patient characteristics, irAEs, cancer type, treatment type, treatment response/progression per RECIST V.1.1, and survival data were collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods estimated HRs for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) along with overall survival (OS)., Results: We identified 247 patients with metastatic cancer who received CS concurrently with CPIs. The median time on CS was 1.8 months. After adjusting for treatment type, tumor type, brain metastases, and irAEs, those treated with CS ≥2 months after starting CPI had a statistically significant longer PFS (HR=0.30, p<0.001), and OS (HR 0.34, p<0.0001) than those who received CS <2 months after starting CPI. Objective response rate (ORR) for patients on CS ≥2 months was 39.8%, versus ORR for patients <2 months was 14.7% (p value =<0.001) CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that early use of CS during CPI treatment significantly hinders CPI efficacy. This data needs to be validated prospectively. Future studies should focus on the immune mechanisms by which CSs affect T-cell function early in the CPI treatment course., Competing Interests: Competing interests: There are no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: The incidence of kidney cancer is increasing; it could be counteracted with new ways to predict and detect it. We aimed to implement an artificial neural network in order to predict new cases of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) in the population using population rate, obesity, smoking incidence, uncontrolled hypertension, and life expectancy data in the United States., Patients and Methods: Statistics were collected on US population numbers, life expectancy, obesity, smoking, and hypertension. We used MATLAB R2018 (MathWorks) software to implement an artificial neural network. Data were repeatedly and randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) subsets., Results: The number of new RCC cases will grow from 44,400 (2020) to 55,400 (2050), an increase of +24.7%. Our data show that preventing hypertension would have the greatest impact on reduction of the incidence, estimated at -775 and -575 cases per year in 2020 and in 2030, respectively. The prevention of obesity and smoking would have a more limited impact, estimated at -64 and -180 cases per year in 2020 and in 2030, respectively, for obesity, and -173 and -21 cases per year in 2020 and in 2030, respectively, for smoking., Conclusions: Our predictions underline the need for accurate studies on RCC-related risk factors to reduce the incidence., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We analyzed the clinical and pathological features of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with cabozantinib stratified by body mass index (BMI). We retrospectively collected data from 16 worldwide centers involved in the treatment of RCC. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses. We collected data from 224 patients with advanced RCC receiving cabozantinib as second- (113, 5%) or third-line (111, 5%) therapy. The median PFS was significantly higher in patients with BMI ≥ 25 (9.9 vs. 7.6 months, p < 0.001). The median OS was higher in the BMI ≥ 25 subgroup (30.7 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.003). As third-line therapy, both median PFS (9.2 months vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.029) and OS (39.4 months vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.039) were longer in patients with BMI ≥ 25. BMI was a significant predictor for both PFS and OS at multivariate analysis. We showed that a BMI ≥ 25 correlates with longer survival in patients receiving cabozantinib. BMI can be easily assessed and should be included in current prognostic criteria for advanced RCC.

Objective: To examine the rates of adverse surgical outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) compared to patients undergoing radical nephrectomy in the nonmetastatic setting using a large administrative database., Methods: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) who underwent a radical nephrectomy between 2011 and 2016 were included. Patients were stratified by the preoperative variable of presence or absence of metastatic cancer. Perioperative outcomes were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between patients with metastatic cancer and perioperative morbidity and 30-day mortality., Results: There were 15,869 total patients included in this analysis of whom 1322 (8%) patients had metastatic cancer. Of the entire cohort, the majority of patients were over 60 years old (58%) and 9621 (61%) were male. Seventy-three of the patients were Caucasian. Patients with metastatic cancer had more minor (P< .01) and major (P< .01) complications, a higher rate of reoperation (P< .01), and a higher rate of unplanned readmissions (P< .01). Finally, the cohort with metastatic cancer had a higher rate of postoperative 30-day mortality (P< .01) than patients without metastatic cancer., Conclusion: Patients undergoing a CN have significantly worse perioperative outcomes than patients undergoing a radical nephrectomy without evidence of metastases. Careful surgical risk stratification and appropriate patient counseling should be undertaken when selecting candidates for CN., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To identify the optimum response criteria for first-line targeted pazopanib therapy in patients with mRCC using solid tumor response criteria and clinical risk factors., Methods: Pre- and post-treatment CTs of patients (n = 43) with mRCC treated with first-line pazopanib therapy were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment response was evaluated with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Choi, modified Choi (mChoi), revised Choi (rChoi), MASS (Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure), 10% threshold criteria, and subjective assessment. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium clinical risk factors were also used to define response groups. Response evaluations were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using log-rank test., Results: Patients with partial response (PR) by mChoi and rChoi had longer OS than those with stable disease (SD) (P < 0.001). Responders by 10% threshold criteria also had better OS, without or combined with clinical criteria. Patients with PR by rChoi, mChoi, RECIST v1.1, MASS criteria, and by subjective assessment had longer PFS than those with SD. rChoi and mChoi criteria best delineated the difference in PFS for patients with PR versus SD, without or combined with clinical criteria., Conclusion: For mRCC patients treated with pazopanib, OS and PFS for PR and SD groups were best predicted by rChoi and mChoi criteria, without or combined with clinical risk factors. 10% threshold criteria also predicted OS and PFS, whereas RECIST did so only in a limited number of patients.

Background: Clinical research studies often integrate precision medicine technologies and techniques, offering novel treatment opportunities for patients but also posing significant challenges for regulatory authorities and local institutional review boards (IRBs) as they attempt to protect patient safety and privacy. Methods: We review the basics of precision medicine and discuss how IRBs are addressing new challenges associated with the era of precision medicine. Results: Precision medicine trials rely on genomic testing for inclusion criteria and investigational drug therapy choices. The vast amounts of complex information that can be obtained from basic genetic sequencing tests must be stored, analyzed, and interpreted, creating challenges for clinicians, researchers, and regulatory staff who are concerned with complex ethical, security, and legal issues surrounding patients' personal genetic data in the digital age. All members of the IRB face a rapidly changing environment. The traditional areas of primary concern, such as patient privacy, terminology, and financial benefits, have been joined by issues associated with precision medicine, such as accelerated US Food and Drug Administration drug approval, multiple informed consent form modifications, increasing length and complexity of informed consent forms, and participant genetic privacy. The challenge to the IRB is to remain focused on the prior areas of significance while also adapting the evaluation process to the novel science of precision medicine. Conclusion: In this era of exponentially increasing big data and easy-to-access genetic sequencing data, IRBs will be tasked with adapting their processes and adjusting to the new technology and its corresponding complexities. Such adaptation has always been required of IRBs, but now it will need to occur rapidly as technology and data analysis capabilities accelerate., (©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).)

Cabozantinib is approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, prognostic factors are still lacking in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in RCC patients treated with second- or third-line cabozantinib. A multicenter retrospective real-world study was conducted, involving 32 worldwide centers. A total of 237 patients with histologically confirmed clear-cell and non-clear-cell RCC who received cabozantinib as second- or third-line therapy for metastatic disease were included. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-strategy failure (TTSF) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses.The median PFS and OS of cabozantinib were 7.76 months (95% CI 6.51-10.88) and 11.57 months (95% CI 10.90-not reached (NR)) as second-line and 11.38 months (95% CI 5.79-NR) and NR (95% CI 11.51-NR) as third-line therapy. The median TTSF and OS were 11.57 and 15.52 months with the sequence of cabozantinib-nivolumab and 25.64 months and NR with nivolumab-cabozantinib, respectively. The difference between these two sequences was statistically significant only in good-risk patients. In the second-line setting, hemoglobin (Hb) levels (HR= 2.39; 95% CI 1.24-4.60, p = 0.009) and IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium) group (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.87, p = 0.037) were associated with PFS while ECOG-PS (HR = 2.33; 95%CI, 1.16-4.69, p = 0.018) and Hb levels (HR = 3.12; 95%CI 1.18-8.26, p = 0.023) correlated with OS at multivariate analysis, while in the third-line setting, only Hb levels (HR = 2.72; 95%CI 1.04-7.09, p = 0.042) were associated with OS. Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study.This real-world study provides evidence on the presence of prognostic factors in RCC patients receiving cabozantinib.

Objective: To investigate whether patients requiring dialysis are a higher risk surgical population and would experience more perioperative adverse events even when undergoing a perceived less invasive operation as a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). LRN is generally a well-tolerated surgical procedure with minimal morbidity and mortality. Prior to transplantation, dialysis patients will often have to undergo a LRN to remove a native kidney with a suspicious mass., Materials and Methods: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent a LRN between 2011 and 2016 were included. Patients were stratified by the need for preoperative dialysis 2 weeks prior to surgery, and perioperative outcomes were compared. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association between the need for preoperative dialysis and perioperative risk., Results: There were 8315 patients included in this analysis of which 445 (5.4%) patients required preoperative dialysis. Patients who required preoperative dialysis had more minor (P <.0001) and major (P = .0025) complications, a higher rate of return to the operating room (P = .002), and a longer length of stay (P <.0001) than those patients not requiring preoperative dialysis. In a multivariate analysis, the need for preoperative dialysis was independently associated with adverse perioperative outcomes (OR= 1.45, CI = 1.08-1.95, P = .015)., Conclusion: Patients requiring preoperative dialysis were more likely to experience a perioperative complication and have a longer length of stay. For LRNs performed prior to transplantation, further risk stratification is needed, and treatment sequencing may need to be reconsidered., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The phase II ABOUND.PS2 study (NCT02289456) assessed safety/tolerability of a first-line modified nab -paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2., Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS 2 received four cycles of nab -paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5 day 1 q3w (induction). Patients without progression received nab -paclitaxel monotherapy (100 mg/m 2 days 1 and 8 q3w) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: percentage of patients discontinuing induction due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)., Results: 11/40 treated patients (27.5%; 95% CI, 14.60-43.89) discontinued chemotherapy induction due to TEAEs; 16/40 (40.0%) continued nab -paclitaxel monotherapy. Median progression-free and overall survival were 4.4 (95% CI, 2.99-7.00) and 7.7 (95% CI, 4.93-13.17) months. Grade 3/4 TEAEs during induction included neutropenia (22.5%), anemia (17.5%), thrombocytopenia (5.0%), and peripheral neuropathy (2.5%)., Conclusion: This nab -paclitaxel-based regimen was tolerable in patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS 2, with efficacy comparable to historical chemotherapy data.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the prognostic value of various solid tumor response criteria as well as the additive value of clinical risk factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Materials and Methods: Two sets of CT scans (pretreatment scans and scans obtained 1-3.5 months after treatment) were reviewed for 57 patients with metastatic RCC treated with pazopanib in the salvage setting. Tumor response on the posttherapy scan was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and Choi, modified Choi (mChoi), MASS (Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure), and 10% threshold criteria. In addition, combined Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk factors plus imaging criteria were used to define response groups. Response evaluations using these criteria were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with use of the log-rank test., Results: Patients classified as having progressive disease (PD) on the basis of RECIST, mChoi, and MASS criteria had a significantly worse OS than patients with stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR). With the addition of MSKCC risk factors, all groups with PD defined by combined criteria had significantly worse OS. For 37 patients with no or one MSKCC risk factor, response groups defined by Choi, mChoi, MASS, and 10% threshold criteria did not differ in PFS or OS. However, among 20 patients with two to three MSKCC risk factors, those classified as having PR had longer PFS than did those with SD and had longer OS than did those with PD., Conclusion: For patients with advanced RCC for which prior therapies have failed, the prognostic value of various imaging-based tumor response criteria differs on the basis of the MSKCC clinical risk status.

Background: Late relapse with presentation of metastatic disease >5 years after nephrectomy with curative intent is a known behavior of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but data on outcomes, especially regarding targeted therapies, are limited. In this study, we analyze clinicopathologic features and response to targeted therapy in patients with late-relapse metastatic RCC (mRCC)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data on consecutive patients treated with targeted therapy for mRCC diagnosed >5 years after nephrectomy with curative intent., Results: A total of 24 patients (100% clear cell histology, median age 72 years, 83% males, all with prior nephrectomies) met inclusion criteria; 71% had favorable risk, and 25% had intermediate risk by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria. The estimated median overall survival for all patients was 60.5 months, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 71.78% (95% confidence interval, 47.98%-84.77%). All patients were treated with targeted therapy; first-line treatments included pazopanib (46%), sorafenib (25%), sunitinib (17%), and cytokine (13%), with no significant difference in time to treatment failure between therapies. Median time on first-line therapy was 19.7 months; 67% of patients received second-line treatment. Metastases were detected at considerable rates in sites considered historically uncommon, such as the pancreas, adrenal glands, and soft tissue., Conclusion: Patients with late-relapse mRCC treated with targeted therapy had prolonged survival that compared favorably to historical controls, and metastases in uncommon sites were noted.

Background: Pazopanib is associated with increased progression-free survival (PFS) in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and has become a standard of care in this disease. The drug is used in metastatic non-clear-cell RCC, but data on outcomes in this setting are limited., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis of records of consecutive metastatic non-clear-cell RCC patients who received pazopanib in front-line and salvage settings between November 2009 and November 2012. Tumor response rate was assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. PFS and overall survival (OS) times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods., Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified with non-clear-cell metastatic RCC, 9 received pazopanib in the front-line setting, 20 in the salvage setting after progression of disease with other targeted therapies. Seven patients (24%) had papillary RCC, 4 (14%) had chromophobe, 5 (17%) had unclassified histopathology, and 13 (45%) had other subtypes including collecting duct, translocation Xp11.2, and various subtypes with sarcomatoid differentiation. All patients discontinued pazopanib before analysis. Median PFS was 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.7-NA [not available]) in the front-line group, and 4 months (95% CI, 2.1-9.9) in the salvage group. Median OS was 31 months (95% CI, 9.2-NA) in the front-line group, and 13.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-NA) in the salvage group., Conclusion: Pazopanib showed efficacy in patients with metastatic non-clear-cell RCC in the front-line and salvage settings. Toxicity was mild to moderate and manageable. Further studies are needed to evaluate pazopanib's role in non-clear-cell RCC in terms of efficacy and safety., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) of the kidney are exceedingly rare. Given the rarity of this neoplasm and the complexity associated with its management, information regarding treatment and outcome is warranted., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with ESFT of the kidney who were treated at MDACC between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2011. Descriptive statistics were used., Results: Thirteen patients were identified (median age, 33 y; male:female 11:2). Common presenting symptoms were back pain, flank pain, and hematuria. Six patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Initial diagnostic biopsy was performed in 6 patients. Immunohistochemistry showed strong positivity for CD99 (mic2) and cytogenetic analysis demonstrated evidence of EWSR1 fusion gene in 8 cases. Nine patients underwent nephrectomy. Frequently used chemotherapy regimens consisted of vincristine, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide. Median overall survival was 17.2 months. Three patients were alive at the time of analysis, at 2, 7, and 11 years from diagnosis (the latter without evidence of disease)., Conclusions: Renal ESFT carry a guarded prognosis with limited response to therapy and short median overall survival. For patients with metastatic disease, diagnostic biopsy and sarcoma-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended as upfront therapeutic strategy. The role of nephrectomy in the metastatic setting is unclear. Future studies with novel therapies are needed.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in a 'real-world' setting in unselected patients, as data regarding unselected patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) treated with first-line pazopanib are limited., Patients and Methods: We reviewed records of patients with metastatic ccRCC treated with first-line pazopanib from 1 November 2009 through to 1 November 2012. Cox models were fitted to evaluate the association of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with patient co-variables., Results: In all, 88 patients were identified; 74 were evaluable for response: two (3%) had a complete response, 27 (36%) a partial response, 36 (49%) had stable disease and nine (12%) had progressive disease. The median PFS was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7-18.3]. PFS was correlated with a Karnofsky Performance Status score of <80 [hazard ratio (HR) 3.26, P < 0.001] and serum lactate dehydrogenase of >1.5 × upper limit of normal (HR 3.25, P = 0.014). The median OS was 29.1 months (95% CI 20.2-not reached). The OS was correlated with brain metastasis (HR 2.55, P = 0.009), neutrophilia (HR 1.179, P = 0.018), and anaemia (HR 3.51, P < 0.001). There were no treatment-related deaths. In all, 53 patients received second-line therapy [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) in 22 patients, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) in 22 patients, and other therapy in nine patients]; the median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI 3.3-25.7) with VEGFR-TKI and 5 months (95% CI 3.5-15.2) with mTORi (P = 0.41); the median OS was 19.9 months (95% CI 12.9-not reached) and 14.2 months (95% CI 8.1-not reached), from initiation of second-line VEGFR-TKI or mTORi, respectively (P = 0.37)., Conclusions: In this retrospective study, first-line pazopanib confirmed its efficacy in metastatic ccRCC. Trends for longer PFS and OS were seen with VEGFR-TKI compared with mTORi after first-line pazopanib., (© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To identify the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with pancreatic metastases (PM) treated with either pazopanib or sunitinib and assess whether PM is an independent prognostic variable in the current therapeutic environment., Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with mRCC in an outpatient clinic was carried out for the period January 2006 to November 2011. Patient characteristics, including demographics, laboratory data and outcomes, were analysed. Baseline characteristics were compared using chi-squared and t-tests and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Predictors of OS were analysed using Cox regression., Results: A total of 228 patients were reviewed, of whom 44 (19.3%) had PM and 184 (81.7%) had metastases to sites other than the pancreas. The distribution of baseline characteristics was equal in both groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of previous nephrectomy, diabetes and number of metastatic sites in the PM group. Four patients had isolated PM, but the majority of patients (68%) with PM had at least three different organ sites of metastases, as compared with 29% in patients without PM (P < 0.01). The distribution of organ sites of metastases was similar, excluding the pancreas, in those with and those without PM (P > 0.05). The median OS was 39 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 24-57, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.42-0.94; P = 0.02) for patients with PM, compared with 26 months (95% CI 21-31) for patients without PM (P < 0.01). CSS was 42 months (95% CI 30-57) in the PM group and 27 months (95% CI 22-33) in the control group (P = 0.05)., Conclusions: Despite a higher number of affected organ sites in the PM cohort, mRCC behaviour in this cohort appears to be more indolent, as demonstrated by a higher median OS. These findings suggest that host or tumour features associated with PM may represent a less aggressive tumour phenotype., (© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Innate and adaptive immunity are both involved in prostate cancer (PCa) carcinogenesis and progression. On this scenario, several immunotherapeutic approaches have been proposed and are presently under extensive investigation in PCa patients. Among emerging immune targets, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4), anti-Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-Programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) agents seem to represent the most promising candidate for these patients, together with oncolytic viruses and vaccines, used alone or in combined strategies. In this review, we focused on emerging immunotherapeutic approaches in patients with PCa, showing the rational for their association with current standard therapies including anti-androgen agents, chemo- or radiation therapy.

Emerging immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoints and tumor associated antigens are leading to important clinical advances and providing a new weapon in patients with prostate (PCa) and bladder cancer (BC) and, in particular, with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The possibility to integrate these agents in the current therapeutic scenario or genitourinary tumors, both in sequential or combined approaches, relies on a more profound comprehension of the protumorigenic activity of the immune system and of the mechanisms of cancer-related immunosuppression. In this regards, neutrophils, T and B lymphocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are implicated in the pathogenesis, progression and development of drug resistance in genitourinary tumors. This review is an overview on the recent insights concerning the role of immune cells in this context.

Bladder cancer treatment, namely systemic therapy, was dominated in the last three decades due to the absence of newer therapeutic options other than chemotherapy regimens. Chemotherapy, by itself, both in first and second-line seems to have achieved the modest plateau of its possibilities at the cost of non-negligible toxicity. Targeted therapies, which changed the therapy of many different tumors, seem rather ineffective in bladder cancer. More recently, a new generation of Immunotherapy based regimens represent the most promising avenue for the future systemic treatment of bladder cancer. Checkpoint inhibition, namely PD1/PD-L1 pathway inhibition, showed impressive results in many other tumor types and are expected to become a major player in the treatment of bladder cancer. Other immunotherapy strategies such as fusion proteins represent distant, although promising, options. A brief overview of the current status of bladder cancer immunotherapy is presented.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most immunoresponsive human cancers. High-dose IL-2 and Interferon-α were once the principle therapies for metastatic RCC, however they had harsh-tolerance profiles and limited response rates. In the last decade, targeted therapies have supplanted cytokine therapy due to higher response rates and more favorable toxicity profiles. Emerging immunotherapies targeting the PD-1 receptor and PD-L1 ligand have shown promising results. Likewise, other novel targeted immunotherapies are currently under evaluation. The safety profiles and response rates of new generation immunotherapies are encouraging and justify the progression of clinical trials. However, longer follow-up data are needed to confirm these promising results. In addition, it is still unclear if an optimal sequence or combinations of new immunotherapies paired with current targeted therapies will emerge.

Multiple lymphomatous polyposis (MLP) is a rare condition in which non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), typically mantle cell lymphoma, presents as multiple mucosal polyps of the intestine. We present the case of a 66-year-old man who presented with newly acquired polyps throughout the colon, detected by endoscopy. Endoscopic biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. The patient underwent treatment on a research protocol. Our case illustrates the importance of considering MLP or other forms of NHL in elderly patients found to have multiple gastrointestinal polyps, especially those who have a history of clear colonoscopy within the previous one to two years.

Several novel recurrent mutations of histone modifying and chromatin remodeling genes have been identified in renal cell carcinoma. These mutations cause loss of function of several genes located in close proximity to VHL and include PBRM1, BAP1 and SETD2. PBRM1 encodes for BAF180, a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, and is inactivated in, on average, 36% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Mutations of BAP1 encode for the histone deubiquitinase BRCA1 associated protein-1, and are present in 10% of ccRCCs. They are largely mutually exclusive with PBRM1 mutations. Mutations to SETD2, a histone methyltransferase, occur in 10% of ccRCC. BAP1- or SETD2-mutated ccRCCs have been associated with poor overall survival, while PBRM1 mutations seem to identify a favorable group of ccRCC tumors. This review describes the roles of PBRM1, BAP1 and SETD2 in the development and progression of ccRCC and their potential for future personalized approaches.

Introduction: Limited data are available regarding patients with renal cell carcinoma and ESRD treated with TTs. The objective of this study was to explore the tolerability and safety of TT in patients with mRCC and ESRD., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with mRCC and ESRD treated at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 2002 to 2012. Patient characteristics including demographic, histology, treatment, and adverse events are reported. Duration of treatment (TOT) was determined from date of drug initiation to discontinuation. Overall survival (OS) was determined from initiation of TT to death. Statistics are descriptive., Results: Fourteen patients were identified. Ten patients had clear-cell histology and 4 had papillary histology. The median number of TTs per patient was 3 (range, 1-4) with median TOT of 28 months for all TTs. Eighty-eight percent of all toxicities were Grade 1 to 2; no Grade 4 toxicities were noted. Treatment discontinuations included 3 patients treated with sorafenib due to hand-foot syndrome, intolerable fatigue, and squamous cell skin cancer development; 2 patients treated with pazopanib due to intolerable fatigue and increased transaminase levels; and 1 patient treated with everolimus due to pneumonitis. Eight patients died from progressive disease. Median OS from initiation of TT was 28.5 months and 35 months from time of diagnosis., Conclusion: Toxicities were mild to moderate and consistent with those reported in previous studies. TTs appear to be safe, well tolerated and produce antitumor response in patients with mRCC and ESRD receiving dialysis., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Outcomes and safety data with pazopanib after targeted therapy (TT) are limited., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated records of consecutive patients with metastatic ccRCC who had progressive disease (PD) after TT and received pazopanib from November 2009 through November 2011. Tumour response was assessed by a blinded radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST). PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods., Results: Ninety-three patients were identified. Median number of prior TTs was 2 (range, 1-5). There were 68 events (PD or death). Among 85 evaluable patients, 13 (15%) had a partial response. Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.5-9.7); median OS was 18.1 months (95% CI: 10.26-NA). Common adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (44%), elevated transaminases (35%), diarrhoea (30%), hypothyroidism (18%), nausea/vomiting (17%), anorexia (14%) and hypertension exacerbation (14%); 91% of AEs were grade 1/2. Eleven patients (12%) discontinued therapy due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths., Concluding Statement: Pazopanib demonstrated efficacy in patients with metastatic ccRCC after PD with other TTs. Toxicity overall was mild/moderate and manageable., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related death for males in the United States. Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing became widely used by the late 1980s, augmenting the digital rectal exam. This led to a decline in the percentage of prostate cancer cases that were metastatic at diagnosis and a decrease in prostate cancer mortality. But some argued it led to overtreatment of prostate cancers as well. Recently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations against routine prostate cancer screening in asymptomatic patients. The recent recommendations have created much controversy among medical professionals, patient advocate groups, and the general public. Most prostate cancer screening recommendations from professional organizations agree that an informed discussion and review of each individual patient's clinical situation should drive the decision to screen or not to screen, but the current USPSTF recommendations largely remove patient and provider autonomy in this regard. They do not contribute toward personalized screening based on individualized patient risk profiles, characteristics, and preferences.

Insights into the biology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) have identified multiple pathways associated with the pathogenesis and progression of this cancer. This progress has led to the development of multiple agents targeting these pathways, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and the mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus. With the exception of temsirolimus, phase 3 trials tested these agents in patients with clear-cell histology; therefore, their efficacy in non-CCRCC is unclear. To date, there is no established effective therapy for patients with advanced non-CCRCC. This article focuses on treatment options for metastatic non-CCRCC., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Insights into renal cell carcinoma (RCC) biology have greatly expanded the treatment armamentarium for metastatic RCC (mRCC). Since 2005, six targeted agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of mRCC, and many new targeted therapies are in development. A number of novel VEGF Inhibitors/Multi-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors are currently in various stages of development. New targeted agents with novel mechanisms of action are also being studied, including Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Angiopoietin/TIE-2 inhibitors, Carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors, vaccines, and others. In addition to combining currently available immunologic therapies with emerging agents, researchers are also developing novel immunologic therapies to treat mRCC, including those that block Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4). Several trials evaluating combinations and sequential therapy of targeted agents have been published, and several others are underway. Trials of special mRCC populations, including poor-risk disease, non-clear cell RCC (NCC-RCC), and papillary type RCC are further refining the use of targeted treatments. As new targeted agents emerge and therapies with novel mechanisms of action are developed, the treatments options available for metastatic RCC are expected to increase. New therapies will likely have fewer detrimental side effects and better efficacy, leading to better quality of life for patients.

More than 60% of the adult US population now meets the criteria for being overweight or obese. Gastric bypass surgery has become a popular and effective way to combat this medical problem. Despite the success of these procedures, they are associated with many complications, including malnutrition, neurological compromise, and vitamin deficiency. Research has determined that even with multivitamin supplementation for life, a large percentage of bypass patients develop vitamin deficiencies. We present a case of beriberi after Roux-en-Y bypass that illustrates the importance of close follow up. A thorough review of vitamin deficiencies in this unique patient population is explored. Vitamin supplementation and treatment recommendations are compiled from the most up-to-date sources. Even patients on regular supplements should be closely monitored for vitamin deficiencies. Patient education regarding vitamin supplementation is vital; it should begin prior to surgery and continue throughout the postoperative period and beyond.

Diverticular disease is common and thought to result from structural abnormalities of the colonic wall, disordered intestinal motility, or deficiencies of dietary fiber. Signs and symptoms of inflammation include fever, abdominal pain, and leukocytosis.