1. Iterative Metaplasticity Across Timescales: How Circadian, Ultradian, and Infradian Rhythms Modulate Memory Mechanisms
- Author
-
Robert L. Spencer, Matthew J. Hartsock, and Helen K. Strnad
- Subjects
Chronobiology ,Neuronal Plasticity ,Physiology ,Computer science ,Article ,Circadian Rhythm ,Rhythm ,Infradian rhythm ,Infradian Rhythm ,Physiology (medical) ,Neuroplasticity ,Metaplasticity ,Circadian rhythm ,Neuroscience ,Ultradian rhythm - Abstract
Work in recent years has provided strong evidence for the modulation of memory function and neuroplasticity mechanisms across circadian (daily), ultradian (shorter-than-daily), and infradian (longer-than-daily) timescales. Despite rapid progress, however, the field has yet to adopt a general framework to describe the overarching role of biological rhythms in memory. To this end, Iyer and colleagues introduced the term iterative metaplasticity, which they define as the “gating of receptivity to subsequent signals that repeats on a cyclic timebase.” The central concept is that the cyclic regulation of molecules involved in neuroplasticity may produce cycles in neuroplastic capacity—that is, the ability of neural cells to undergo activity-dependent change. Although Iyer and colleagues focus on the circadian timescale, we think their framework may be useful for understanding how biological rhythms influence memory more broadly. In this review, we provide examples and terminology to explain how the idea of iterative metaplasticity can be readily applied across circadian, ultradian, and infradian timescales. We suggest that iterative metaplasticity may not only support the temporal niching of neuroplasticity processes but also serve an essential role in the maintenance of memory function.
- Published
- 2021