Search

Supplemental Figure 1. Study Design and Patient Disposition Supplemental Figure 2. Change in serum creatinine by visit Supplemental Figure 3. Change in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) by visit Supplemental Figure 4. Maximum observed value in cystatin C by visit Supplemental Figure 5. Minimum Observed Value in Neutrophils by Visit

Study disposition

Supplemental Table 1. Post-discontinuation therapies

Purpose: The phase II MONARCH 1 study was designed to evaluate the single-agent activity and adverse event (AE) profile of abemaciclib, a selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, in women with refractory hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Experimental Design: MONARCH 1 was a phase II single-arm open-label study. Women with HR+/HER2− MBC who had progressed on or after prior endocrine therapy and had 1 or 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting were eligible. Abemaciclib 200 mg was administered orally on a continuous schedule every 12 hours until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of MONARCH 1 was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Results: Patients (n = 132) had a median of 3 (range, 1–8) lines of prior systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, 90.2% had visceral disease, and 50.8% had ≥3 metastatic sites. At the 12-month final analysis, the primary objective of confirmed objective response rate was 19.7% (95% CI, 13.3–27.5; 15% not excluded); clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD≥6 months) was 42.4%, median progression-free survival was 6.0 months, and median overall survival was 17.7 months. The most common treatment-emergent AEs of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; discontinuations due to AEs were infrequent (7.6%).Conclusions: In this poor-prognosis, heavily pretreated population with refractory HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer, continuous dosing of single-agent abemaciciclib was well tolerated and exhibited promising clinical activity. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5218–24. ©2017 AACR.

Participant PIK3CA-mutation central testing results

PDF file - 121K, Table 1. Supplemental Table 1. Comparison of the Patients Analyzable for VEGFA Amplification to All Patients Enrolled on E2100 Table 2. Estimated Progression Free Survival treatment hazard ratios (arm A vs. arm B) and 95% confidence intervals for various subsets. Comparison between the cases analyzable for VEGFA amplification and all cases in E2100

Purpose: Clinically validated biomarkers for anti-angiogenesis agents are not available. We have previously reported associations between candidate VEGFA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and overall survival (OS) in E2100. The associations between tumor VEGFA amplification and outcome are evaluated here.Experimental Design: E2100 was a phase III trial comparing paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab for patients with metastatic breast cancer. FISH to assess gene amplification status for VEGFA was conducted on paraffin-embedded tumors from 363 patients in E2100. Evaluation for association between amplification status and outcomes was conducted.Results: Estrogen receptor (ER)+ or progesterone receptor (PR)+ tumors were less likely to have VEGFA amplification than ER/PR− tumors (P = 0.020). VEGFA amplification was associated with worse OS (20.2 vs. 25.3 months; P = 0.013) in univariate analysis with a trend for worse OS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.08). There was a significant interaction between VEGFA amplification, hormone receptor status, and study arm. Patients with VEGFA amplification and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) or HER2 amplification had inferior OS (P = 0.047); amplification did not affect OS for those who were ER+ or PR+ and HER2−. Those who received bevacizumab with VEGFA amplification had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.010) and OS (P = 0.042); no association was seen in the control arm. Test for interaction between study arm and VEGFA amplification with OS was not significant.Conclusion:VEGFA amplification in univariate analysis was associated with poor outcomes; this was particularly prominent in HER2+ or TNBCs. Additional studies are necessary to confirm the trend for poor OS seen on multivariate analysis for patients treated with bevacizumab. Clin Cancer Res; 19(5); 1281–9. ©2012 AACR.

Methods that support the supplemental data provided

Purpose: This single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer.Patients and Methods: Patients received 6-mg oral taselisib capsules daily plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor tissue (if available) was centrally evaluated for PIK3CA mutations. Adverse events (AE) were recorded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Tumor response was investigator-determined using RECIST v1.1.Results: Median treatment duration was 4.6 (range: 0.9–40.5) months. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, 30 (50.0%) had grade ≥3 AEs, and 19 (31.7%) experienced 35 serious AEs. Forty-seven of 60 patients had evaluable tissue for central PIK3CA mutation testing [20 had mutations, 27 had no mutation detected (MND)]. In patients with baseline measurable disease, clinical activity was observed in tumors with PIK3CA mutations [best confirmed response rate: 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4); clinical benefit rate (CBR): 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4)], PIK3CA-MND [best confirmed response rate: 14.3% (3/21; 95% CI, 3.0–36.3); CBR: 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2–47.2)], and unknown PIK3CA mutation status [best confirmed response rate: 20.0% (2/10; 95% CI, 2.5–55.6); CBR: 30.0% (3/10; 95% CI, 6.7–65.2)].Conclusions: Taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity irrespective of PIK3CA mutation status, with numerically higher objective response rate and CBR in patients with PIK3CA-mutated (vs. -MND) locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, HR-positive breast cancer. No new safety signals were reported. A confirmatory phase III trial is ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4380–7. ©2018 AACR.

Definition of adverse events of special interest (AESI)

Germline variants might predict cancer progression. Bevacizumab improves overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancers. No biomarkers are available to identify patients that benefit from bevacizumab. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was conducted in 1,520 patients from Phase III trials (CALGB 80303, 40503, 80405 and ICON7), where bevacizumab was randomized to treatment without bevacizumab. We aimed to identify genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with survival independently of bevacizumab treatment or through interaction with bevacizumab. A cause-specific Cox model was used to test the SNP-OS association in both arms combined (prognostic), and the effect of SNPs-bevacizumab interaction on OS (predictive) in each study. The SNP effects across studies were combined using inverse variance. Findings were tested for replication in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA). In the GWAS meta-analysis, patients with rs680949 in PRUNE2 experienced shorter OS compared to patients without it (P = 1.02 × 10-7 , hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-1.86), as well as in TCGA (P = .0219, HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.35). In the GWAS meta-analysis, patients with rs16852804 in BARD1 experienced shorter OS compared to patients without it (P = 1.40 × 10-5 , HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.25-1.82) as well as in TCGA (P = 1.39 × 10-4 , HR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.73-5.51). Patients with rs3795897 in AGAP1 experienced shorter OS in the bevacizumab arm compared to the nonbevacizumab arm (P = 1.43 × 10-5 ). The largest GWAS meta-analysis of bevacizumab treated patients identified PRUNE2 and BARD1 (tumor suppressor genes) as prognostic genes of colorectal and ovarian cancer, respectively, and AGAP1 as a potentially predictive gene that interacts with bevacizumab with respect to patient survival.

Purpose In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), single-agent abemaciclib demonstrated promising efficacy activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To help interpret these results and put in clinical context, we compared overall survival (OS) and duration of therapy (DoT) between MONARCH 1 and a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort. Methods The real-world chemotherapy cohort was created from a Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database based on key eligibility criteria from MONARCH 1. The chemotherapies included in the cohort were single-agent capecitabine, gemcitabine, eribulin, or vinorelbine. Results were adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical differences using Mahalanobis distance matching (primary analysis) and entropy balancing (sensitivity analysis). OS and DoT were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort (n = 281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n = 132) was identified. The MONARCH 1 (n = 108) cohort was matched to the real-world chemotherapy cohort (n = 108). Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm versus 13.6 months in the matched real-world chemotherapy cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54. The median DoT was 4.1 months in MONARCH 1 compared to 2.9 months in the real-world chemotherapy cohort with HR of 0.76. Conclusions This study demonstrates an approach to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for trial data. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and place the benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context.

Alpelisib is a selective inhibitor of PI3Kα, shown to improve outcomes for PIK3CA mutant, hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancers (MBC) when combined with antiestrogen therapy. To uncover mechanisms of resistance, we conducted a detailed, longitudinal analysis of tumor and plasma circulating tumor DNA among such patients from a phase I/II trial combining alpelisib with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) (NCT01870505). The trial's primary objective was to establish safety with maculopapular rash emerging as the most common grade 3 adverse event (33%). Among 44 evaluable patients, the observed clinical benefit rate was 52%. Correlating genetic alterations with outcome, we identified loss-of-function PTEN mutations in 25% of patients with resistance. ESR1 activating mutations also expanded in number and allele fraction during treatment and were associated with resistance. These data indicate that genomic alterations that mediate resistance to alpelisib or antiestrogen may promote disease progression and highlight PTEN loss as a recurrent mechanism of resistance to PI3Kα inhibition.

Seeing double can be a good thingMany human breast cancers harbor activating mutations inPIK3CA, the gene coding for the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the efficacy of PI3K inhibitors in cancer patients. Vasanet al.found unexpectedly that a subset of breast cancers harbor not one—but two—PIK3CAmutations, and the mutations occur on the same allele (see the Perspective by Toker). In model systems, the double mutations hyperactivate PI3K signaling and enhance tumor growth. Preliminary analysis of clinical trial data suggests that breast cancers with double mutations are more responsive to PI3K inhibitors than those with a single mutation.PIK3CAmutational status could help identify the breast cancer patients most likely to benefit from these drugs.Science, this issue p.714; see also p.685

Purpose: Endocrine based therapy is an effective strategy to manage hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, nearly all patients exhibit/develop either de novo or acquired resistance. While prognostic biomarkers of endocrine responsiveness are well established for the adjuvant treatment in ER+ breast cancer, less is known regarding prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response in the first line ABC setting. We sought to develop a clinical calculator based on clinical criteria for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of women with HR+/HER2- ABC who will be receiving endocrine monotherapy as first-line treatment for ABC. Methods: The development of the clinical calculator will be based on data from modern clinical trials in women with HR+/HER2- ABC. The studies to be included in the final analyses are given in Table 1. The control arm data from trials1-6 will form the training dataset (N = 1,223) and be used to construct the clinical prediction models. Variables considered include age, race, ECOG status, disease measurability, body mass index, disease-free interval, number of metastatic sites, locations of metastatic sites, prior endocrine therapy, and prior chemotherapy. Missing values will be imputed using single imputation with all variables included in the imputation model. For continuous variables, restricted cubic splines will be used to determine if non-linear effects may be more appropriate. The Lasso regression will be used as a variable selection technique to reduce the dimensionality of covariates; initially all pairwise interactions will be included in the model. Following Lasso regression, the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models will be constructed for PFS and OS including only variables retained in Lasso. The final model will be internally validated for discrimination and calibration using 10-fold cross-validation. External validation will be performed using control arm data from EGF 30008 (N = 536). Results: To date, control arm data from four trials (trials 1-4) have been received. The preliminary results presented here are based on pooled data from C40503 and LEA, for which data elements have been harmonized. Models for predicting PFS and OS have good calibration and are associated with bias-corrected C-indices of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. These models will be updated using pooled data from trials 1-6. Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrate that clinical calculators based on baseline clinical factors can provide accurate prediction of PFS and OS in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with first-line ET. If validated, these tools may be used for risk stratification in future clinical trials and to identify patients who may require more or less aggressive therapy. Table 1:Studies to be includedTrial NumberTrial NameTrial PISample Size in Control Arm1C40503Maura Dickler152 (letrozole)2LEAMiguel Martin179 (letrozole)3FACTJonas Bergh188 (anastrozole)4FALCONJohn Robertson194 (anastrozole)5S0226Rita Mehta345 (anastrozole)6MONARCH 3Matthew Goetz165 (nonsteroidal AI)7EGF 30008Stephen Johnston536 (letrozole) Citation Format: Polley M-YC, Dickler MN, Johnston S, Goetz MP, de la Haba J, Loibl S, Mehta RS, Bergh J, Roberston J, Barlow W, Liu H, Tenner K, Martin M. A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced stage breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-05.

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER positive breast cancer. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. Based on preclinical and clinical data, SERDs are expected be effective in patients harboring ESR1 mutations. Biomarker analysis was performed on plasma and tumor samples from the Phase I study of GDC-0927 in metastatic breast cancer (Dickler et al, SABCS 2017) with the goal of evaluating activity in both ESR1 mutant and wildtype tumors, and to assess ER pathway modulation. Methods: Hotspot mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, and AKT1 were analyzed in baseline, on-treatment and end of treatment plasma derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using the BEAMing assay in patients treated at multiple dose levels of GDC-0927. A subset of samples was analyzed with Foundation Medicine's next generation sequencing ctDNA assay (FACT), which covers genomic alterations in 62 commonly altered genes. Paired pre- and on-treatment biopsies were collected to assess ER pathway modulation. ER, PR, and Ki67 protein levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Gene expression analysis was performed using Illumina's RNA Access library preparation kit followed by paired-end (2x50b, 50M reads) sequencing on the HiSeq. Results: Baseline and on-treatment plasma samples were available for 40 patients. ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations were observed in 52% and 33% of patient baseline samples, respectively (BEAMing method). Mutant allele frequencies (MAF) generally declined in the first on-treatment samples collected for both ESR1 (16 out of 21 samples) and PIK3CA (7 out of 12 samples). The majority of the reductions were greater than 95% relative to baseline. Increases in ESR1 MAFs were observed in later time-points and were not associated with any particular ESR1 mutation. There were six instances for which an ESR1 mutation was detected in an on-treatment sample that was not detected in the baseline sample, three at L536P and one each at D538G, L536H, and S463P, and four out of six with MAFs close to the limit of detection. The FACT assay also detected alterations in CDH1, NF1, PTEN, and TP53 in baseline samples. The relationship between MAF changes and clinical benefit to GDC-0927 will be presented. A predefined, experimentally-derived set of ER target genes were evaluated in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy pairs from six patients. Four of the six patients showed evidence of suppression in ER pathway activity, one patient treated at the 1000 mg dose level and three at the 1400 mg dose. The degree of pathway suppression was associated with pre-treatment pathway levels and decreases of ER and Ki67 protein levels. Conclusions: We report here evidence of consistent reduction of ESR1 and PIK3CA ctDNA in patients treated with GDC-0927. ER pathway suppression was observed at both the transcript and protein level confirming pharmacodynamic activity of the SERD. Citation Format: Spoerke JM, Daemen A, Chang C-W, Giltnane J, Metcalfe C, Dickler MN, Bardia A, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Liu L, Li R, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Lackner MR. Phamacodynamic and circulating tumor DNA evaluation in a phase I study of GDC-0927, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist/ degrader (SERD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-01.

Background In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), abemaciclib demonstrated promising single-agent activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC).1 Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 19.7% (95% CI: 13.3, 27.5) and at 18 months minimum follow-up median overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months. Due to the single-arm trial design of MONARCH 1, there is a need to view these results in clinical context relative to available treatment options. This study compared the OS results of abemaciclib in MONARCH 1 vs that in a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort with similar patient and disease characteristics. Methods MONARCH 1 study design and key eligibility criteria were previously described.1 The real-world cohort was based on Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived, nationally representative (USA-based) database comprising patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction, for patients with MBC between January 1, 2011 through February 28, 2018. A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort was created based on the key eligibility criteria of MONARCH 1 and included patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2- MBC who received single-agent chemotherapy (eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) following 1-2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting, had an ECOG PS of 0-1, and no prior CDK4 & 6 therapy. The index date was the start of the eligible single-agent chemotherapy, and patients were followed from the index date until date of death, loss to follow-up, or end of the database, whichever occurred earlier. OS results were adjusted using 2 methods (Mahalanobis distance matching and entropy balancing with bootstrapping) to account for baseline demographic and clinical differences between the real-world and trial cohorts. Results A real-world cohort (n=281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n=132) was identified. A subsequent matching based on Mahalanobis distance was performed to match MONARCH 1 population (n=108) with the real-world cohort (n=108). The matched cohorts demonstrated similar patient and disease characteristics. Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm vs 13.6 months in the matched cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.77). Results of a sensitivity analysis performed using entropy balancing were consistent with an adjusted median OS of 12.7 months in the real-world cohort (n=281)with HR of 0.57 (95% CI from bootstrapping: 0.44, 0.78). Conclusion Methodological advances to adjust for potential biases, and improvements in data quality, have evolved enabling the ability to leverage a real-world cohort as an external comparator arm. This study demonstrates the ability to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for MONARCH 1. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and adequately place the clinical benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context. References Dickler et al, CCR 2017 Citation Format: Rugo H, Dieras V, Cortes J, Patt D, Wildiers H, O'Shaughnessy J, Zamora E, Yardley DY, Carter GC, Sheffield KM, Li L, Andre VA, Derbyshire RE, Li XI, Frenzel M, Huang Y-J, Dickler MN, Tolaney SM. Real-world survival of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy - A comparison with MONARCH 1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-19.

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy (ET) is an effective strategy to treat hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) but nearly all patients eventually progress. Our goal was to develop and validate a web-based clinical calculator for predicting disease outcomes in women with HR+ABC who are candidates for receiving first-line single-agent ET. METHODS: The meta-database comprises 891 patient-level data from the control arms of five contemporary clinical trials where patients received first-line single-agent ET (either aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) for ABC. Risk models were constructed for predicting 24-months progression-free survival (PFS-24) and 24-months overall survival (OS-24). Final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using ten-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Higher number of sites of metastases, measurable disease, younger age, lower body mass index, negative PR status, and prior endocrine therapy were associated with worse PFS. Final PFS and OS models were well-calibrated and associated with cross-validated time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.61 and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ABC calculator is internally valid and can accurately predict disease outcomes. It may be used to predict patient prognosis, aid planning of first-line treatment strategies, and facilitate risk stratification for future clinical trials in patients with HR+ABC. Future validation of the proposed models in independent patient cohorts is warranted.

Purpose To determine the longitudinal impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen-only treatments on the reproductive potential of women with breast cancer by using a sensitive ovarian reserve marker anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a surrogate. Methods One-hundred-and-forty-two women with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer were prospectively followed with serum AMH assessments before the initiation, and 12, 18 and 24 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy or the start of tamoxifen-only treatment. The chemotherapy regimens were classified into Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-based (AC-based) and Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate + 5-Fluorouracil (CMF). Longitudinal data were analyzed by mixed effects model for treatment effects over time, adjusting for baseline age and BMI. Results Both chemotherapy regimens resulted in significant decline in ovarian reserve compared to the tamoxifen-only treatment (p < 0.0001 either regimen vs. tamoxifen for overall trend). AMH levels sharply declined at 12 months but did not show a significant recovery from 12 to 18 and 18 to 24 months after the completion of AC-based or CMF regimens. The degree of decline did not differ between the two chemotherapy groups (p = 0.53). In contrast, tamoxifen-only treatment did not significantly alter the age-adjusted serum AMH levels over the 24-month follow up. Likewise, the use of adjuvant tamoxifen following AC-based regimens did not affect AMH recovery. Conclusions Both AC-based regimens and CMF significantly compromise ovarian reserve, without a recovery beyond 12 months post-chemotherapy. In contrast, tamoxifen-only treatment does not seem to alter ovarian reserve. These data indicate that the commonly used chemotherapy regimens but not the hormonal therapy compromise future reproductive potential. Q2 WOS:000569566700004 2-s2.0-85091042082 PMID: 32930927

Alpelisib is a selective inhibitor of PI3Kα, shown to improve outcomes for PIK3CA mutant, hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancers (MBC) when combined with antiestrogen therapy. To uncover mechanisms of resistance, we conducted a detailed, longitudinal analysis of tumor and plasma circulating tumor DNA among such patients from a phase I/II trial combining alpelisib with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) (NCT01870505). The trial’s primary objective was to establish safety with maculopapular rash emerging as the most common grade 3 adverse event (33%). Among 44 evaluable patients, the observed clinical benefit rate was 52%. Correlating genetic alterations with outcome, we identified loss-of-function PTEN mutations in 25% of patients with resistance. ESR1 activating mutations also expanded in number and allele fraction during treatment and were associated with resistance. These data indicate that genomic alterations that mediate resistance to alpelisib or antiestrogen may promote disease progression and highlight PTEN loss as a recurrent mechanism of resistance to PI3Kα inhibition.

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hormone receptor–positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients randomized to letrozole alone or letrozole plus bevacizumab in the first-line setting (CALGB 40503). Experimental Design: Blood samples were collected at pretreatment and three additional time points during therapy. The presence of ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 mL of blood was considered CTC positive. Association of CTCs with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Of 343 patients treated, 294 had CTC data and were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 39 months. In multivariable analysis, CTC-positive patients at baseline (31%) had significantly reduced PFS [HR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–1.97] and OS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.49–2.93) compared with CTC negative. Failure to clear CTCs during treatment was associated with significantly increased risk of progression (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.58–3.07) and death (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.36–4.88). CTC-positive patients who received only letrozole had the worse PFS (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.54–3.47) and OS (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.59–4.40). Median PFS in CTC-positive patients was significantly longer (18.0 vs. 7.0 months) in letrozole plus bevacizumab versus letrozole arm (P = 0.0009). Restricted mean survival time analysis further revealed that addition of bevacizumab was associated with PFS benefit in both CTC-positive and CTC-negative patients, but OS benefit was only observed in CTC-positive patients. Conclusions: CTCs were highly prognostic for the addition of bevacizumab to first-line letrozole in patients with HR+ MBC in CALGB 40503. Further research to determine the potential predictive value of CTCs in this setting is warranted.

BackgroundTo determine the longitudinal impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen-only treatments on ovarian reserve by serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in women with breast cancer.MethodsOne-hundred-and-forty-two women with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer were prospectively followed with serum AMH assessments before the initiation, and 12, 18 and 24 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy or the start of tamoxifen-only treatment. The chemotherapy regimens were classified into Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-based (AC-based) and Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate+5-Fluorouracil (CMF). Longitudinal data were analyzed by mixed effects model for treatment effects over time, adjusting for baseline age and BMI.ResultsBoth chemotherapy regimens resulted in significant decline in ovarian reserve compared to the tamoxifen-only treatment (pConclusionsBoth AC-based and CMF regimens significantly compromise ovarian reserve, which does not recover during the 12-24-month post-chemotherapy follow up. In contrast, tamoxifen treatment does not seem to alter ovarian reserve. This novel information should be valuable for fertility preservation counselling and in assessing future reproductive potential of breast cancer survivors.

Objective To assess whether woman who have BRCA mutations (WBM) experience more declines in ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, as it induces oocyte death by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, and BRCA mutations result in DNA damage repair deficiency. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting Academic centers. Patient(s) The 108 evaluable women with breast cancer were stratified into those never tested (negative family history; n = 35) and those negative (n = 59) or positive (n = 14) for a pathogenic BRCA mutation. Intervention(s) Sera were longitudinally obtained before and 12–24 months after chemotherapy treatment, assayed for antimullerian hormone (AMH), and adjusted for age at sample collection. Main Outcome Measure(s) Ovarian recovery, defined as the geometric mean of the after chemotherapy age-adjusted AMH levels compared with baseline levels. Result(s) Compared with the controls, the before chemotherapy treatment AMH levels were 24% and 34% lower in those negative or positive for BRCA mutations, consistent with accelerated ovarian aging in WBM. The WBM had a threefold difference in AMH recovery after chemotherapy treatment (1.6%), when compared with BRCA negative (3.7%) and untested/low risk controls (5.2%). Limiting the analysis to the most common regimen, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, showed similar results. These findings were mechanistically confirmed in an in vitro mouse oocyte BRCA knockdown bioassay, which showed that BRCA deficiency results in increased oocyte susceptibility to doxorubicin. Conclusion(s) Women who have pathogenic BRCA mutations are more likely to lose ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, suggesting an emphasis on fertility preservation. Furthermore, our findings generate the hypothesis that DNA repair deficiency is a shared mechanism between aging, infertility, and cancer. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00823654.

Background Overexpression and activation of tyrosine kinase Src has been linked to breast carcinogenesis and bone metastases. We showed the feasibility of combining the SRC inhibitor dasatinib with weekly paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and herein report the subsequent phase II trial. Patients and Methods Patients had received ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens for measurable, HER2-negative MBC. Patients received paclitaxel and dasatinib (120 mg daily) and were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for overall response rate (ORR), the primary end point. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A 30% ORR (n = 55) was deemed worthy of further investigation. Exploratory biomarkers included N-telopeptide (NTX) and plasma vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 as predictors of clinical benefit. Results From March 2010 to March 2014, 40 patients, including 2 men enrolled. The study was stopped early because of slow accrual. Overall, 32 patients (80%) had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and 23 (58%) had previously received taxanes. Of the 35 assessable patients, 1 (3%) had complete response and 7 (20%) partial response, resulting in an ORR of 23%. The median PFS and OS was 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-9.9) and 20.6 (95% CI, 12.9-25.2) months, respectively. As expected, fatigue (75%), neuropathy (65%), and diarrhea (50%) were common side effects, but were generally low-grade. Median baseline NTX was similar in patients who had clinical benefit (8.2 nmol BCE) and no clinical benefit (10.9 nmol BCE). Similarly, median baseline VEGF levels were similar between the 2 groups; 93.0 pg/mL versus 83.0 pg/mL. Conclusion This phase II study of dasatinib and paclitaxel was stopped early because of slow accrual but showed some clinical activity. Further study is not planned.

Purpose: This single-arm, open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer.Patients and Methods: Patients received 6-mg oral taselisib capsules daily plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor tissue (if available) was centrally evaluated for PIK3CA mutations. Adverse events (AE) were recorded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Tumor response was investigator-determined using RECIST v1.1.Results: Median treatment duration was 4.6 (range: 0.9–40.5) months. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, 30 (50.0%) had grade ≥3 AEs, and 19 (31.7%) experienced 35 serious AEs. Forty-seven of 60 patients had evaluable tissue for central PIK3CA mutation testing [20 had mutations, 27 had no mutation detected (MND)]. In patients with baseline measurable disease, clinical activity was observed in tumors with PIK3CA mutations [best confirmed response rate: 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4); clinical benefit rate (CBR): 38.5% (5/13; 95% CI, 13.9–68.4)], PIK3CA-MND [best confirmed response rate: 14.3% (3/21; 95% CI, 3.0–36.3); CBR: 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2–47.2)], and unknown PIK3CA mutation status [best confirmed response rate: 20.0% (2/10; 95% CI, 2.5–55.6); CBR: 30.0% (3/10; 95% CI, 6.7–65.2)].Conclusions: Taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity irrespective of PIK3CA mutation status, with numerically higher objective response rate and CBR in patients with PIK3CA-mutated (vs. -MND) locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, HR-positive breast cancer. No new safety signals were reported. A confirmatory phase III trial is ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4380–7. ©2018 AACR.

Background The investigation of exercise training in metastatic breast cancer has received minimal attention. This study determined the feasibility and safety of aerobic training in metastatic breast cancer. Methods Sixty-five women (age, 21-80 years) with metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer (57% were receiving chemotherapy, and >40% had ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy) were allocated to an aerobic training group (n = 33) or a stretching group (n = 32). Aerobic training consisted of 36 supervised treadmill walking sessions delivered thrice weekly between 55% and 80% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak ) for 12 consecutive weeks. Stretching was matched to aerobic training with respect to location, frequency, duration, and intervention length. The primary endpoint was aerobic training feasibility, which was a priori defined as the lost to follow-up (LTF) rate ( Results One of the 33 patients (3%) receiving aerobic training was LTF, whereas the mean attendance rate was 63% ± 30%. The rates of permanent discontinuation and dose modification were 27% and 49%, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses indicated improvements in PROs, which favored the attention control group (P values > .05). Per protocol analyses indicated that 14 of 33 patients (42%) receiving aerobic training had acceptable tolerability (relative dose intensity ≥ 70%), and this led to improvements in VO2peak and functional capacity (P values Conclusions Aerobic training at the dose and schedule tested is safe but not feasible for a significant proportion of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The acceptable feasibility and promising benefit for select patients warrant further evaluation in a dose-finding phase 1/2 study. Cancer 2018;124:2552-60. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: We profiled circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to study the biology of blood-borne metastasis and to monitor biomarker status in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Methods: CTCs were isolated from 105 patients with MBC using EPCAM-based immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cells sorting (IE/FACS), 28 of whom had serial CTC analysis (74 samples, 2–5 time points). CTCs were subjected to microfluidic-based multiplex QPCR array of 64 cancer-related genes (n = 151) and genome-wide copy-number analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH; n = 49).Results: Combined transcriptional and genomic profiling showed that CTCs were 26% ESR1−ERBB2−, 48% ESR1+ERBB2−, and 27% ERBB2+. Serial testing showed that ERBB2 status was more stable over time compared with ESR1 and proliferation (MKI67) status. While cell-to-cell heterogeneity was observed at the single-cell level, with increasingly stable expression in larger pools, patient-specific CTC expression “fingerprints” were also observed. CTC copy-number profiles clustered into three groups based on the extent of genomic aberrations and the presence of large chromosomal imbalances. Comparative analysis showed discordance in ESR1/ER (27%) and ERBB2/HER2 (23%) status between CTCs and matched primary tumors. CTCs in 65% of the patients were considered to have low proliferation potential. Patients who harbored CTCs with high proliferation (MKI67) status had significantly reduced progression-free survival (P = 0.0011) and overall survival (P = 0.0095) compared with patients with low proliferative CTCs.Conclusions: We demonstrate an approach for complete isolation of EPCAM-positive CTCs and downstream comprehensive transcriptional/genomic characterization to examine the biology and assess breast cancer biomarkers in these cells over time. Clin Cancer Res; 24(6); 1486–99. ©2018 AACR.

Background: Modulation of estrogen activity and/or synthesis is the mainstay therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ER+ BC. However, despite the effectiveness of available endocrine therapies, many patients ultimately relapse or develop resistance to these agents via estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, including mutations in ESR1 affecting the ER ligand binding domain that drive ER-dependent transcription and proliferation in the absence of estrogen. ER antagonists that are efficacious against ligand-dependent and ligand-independent, constitutively active ESR1 mutant tumors may be of substantial therapeutic benefit. GDC-0927 (formerly known as SRN-927) is a novel, potent, non-steroidal, orally bioavailable, selective ER antagonist/ER degrader (SERD) that induces tumor regression in ER+ BC patient-derived xenograft models. Methods: A phase I dose escalation study with 3+3 design was conductedin postmenopausal women with ER+ (HER2-) metastatic BC (progressing ≥ 6 months on endocrine therapy and with ≤ 2 prior chemotherapies in the advanced or metastatic setting) to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES)-PET scans. Plasma PK samples (after single dose and at steady state), CT scans, and when feasible, pre and on-study tumor biopsies were obtained Results: From March 16, 2015 to March 17, 2017 patients (pts) with a median age of 53 years (range 44-69) and a median number of prior therapies for MBC 4 (range 1-7) were enrolled at 3 total daily dose levels (600, 1000, 1400 mg) once daily (QD) given orally with fasting (n = 12). Increases in GDC-0927 exposure were approximately dose proportional. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were all grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea (54%, n = 7), diarrhea (46%, n = 6), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (39%, n = 5) and anemia, constipation, (each 31%, n = 4). Treatment interruption was required for 2 pts due to nausea and vomiting. Of those pts with FES-PET avid disease at baseline (9 of 12), all post-therapy scans showed complete or near complete (> 90%) suppression of FES uptake to background levels, including pts with ESR1 mutations. Evidence of reduced ER levels and Ki67 staining was observed in on-treatment biopsies. Five of 12 pts (1 at 600 mg and 4 at 1400 mg) were on study ≥ 24 weeks (CBR = 41.6 %) with the best overall response of stable disease with 1 patient (ESR1 mt+ D538G) on study for over 490 days. There were no dose limiting toxicities and no SAEs related to study drug. R2PD was 1400 mg and was selected for single arm dose-expansion which is now complete with last patient enrolled on March 17, 2017. Updated results from dose-escalation and dose-expansion will be presented at the meeting (N = 43). Conclusions: GDC-0927 appears well-tolerated to date with PK exposure supporting QD dosing, evidence of robust PD target engagement, and encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with advanced or metastatic ER+ BC, including pts with ESR1 mutations. Citation Format: Dickler MN, Villanueva R, Perez Fidalgo JA, Mayer IA, Boni V, Winer EP, Hamilton EP, Bellet M, Urruticoechea A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Cortes J, Martin M, Giltnane J, Gates M, Cheeti S, Fredrickson J, Wang X, Friedman LS, Spoerke JM, Metcalfe C, Liu L, Li R, Morley R, McCurry U, Chan IT, Mueller L, Milan S, Lauchle J, Humke EW, Bardia A. A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), GDC-0927, in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-10.

Background: Abemaciclib is a selective and potent small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and 6, with evidence of single-agent antitumor activity, and a safety profile that enables dosing on a continuous schedule. Abemaciclib demonstrated anti-tumor activity as a single agent with a 19.7% objective response rate for women with previously treated HR+, HER2- MBC1. In the phase 1b study JPBH, abemaciclib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile when combined with endocrine or HER2 targeted agents for MBC2. Abemaciclib given BID in combination with pembrolizumab also demonstrated a tolerable safety profile in phase 1b study of stage IV NSCLC3. Methods: JPCE is a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1b study of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC or NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02779751). The study has 3 disease-specific cohorts, each with approximately 25 patients (N=75); the HR+, HER2- MBC cohort (part C) will be presented here. The primary objective was to characterize safety of the abemaciclib and pembrolizumab combination. Secondary objectives included efficacy endpoints (objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival), pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab, and changes in patient-reported pain and disease-related symptoms. Patients received 150 mg of abemaciclib orally Q12H plus pembrolizumab 200 mg as a 30-minute IV infusion on Day 1 every 21 days. Eligible patients included women with confirmed HR+, HER2- MBC who have previously received at least 1 but no more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC; are able to provide tumor tissue at baseline and at cycle 3, day 1; have measurable disease (RECIST v.1.1), adequate organ function, ECOG PS ≤1, are able to swallow oral medications; and have not received treatment with CDK4 & 6 or PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitors. Results: At the time of abstract submission, study JPCE part C cohort (HR+, HER2- MBC) was fully enrolled at 25 patients. Data to be presented include patient demographics, baseline disease characteristics, adverse events by frequency and by grade, and preliminary efficacy of the abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab combination in HR+, HER2- MBC. References: 1. Dickler et al, Clin Cancer Res. 2017 2. Goetz et al. poster presented at SABCS, 2015 3. Goldman et al. poster presented at IASLC 2016 Citation Format: Rugo HS, Kabos P, Dickler MN, John WJ, Smith I, Lu Y, Young S, Tolaney SM. A phase 1b study of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-01.

Background: There is evidence that many cancer survivors live with sexual dysfunction that impacts their quality of life. It is essential to identify factors that influence the development of sexual symptoms and understand their trajectory over time in order to guide potential interventions to treat sexual dysfunction. Most studies to date have been cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are needed to understand the change of sexual function over time. This study aims to investigate and describe the factors that impact sexual health and dysfunction in breast cancer patients during and after their cancer treatment. Methods: A longitudinal prospective trial is being conducted in premenopausal women 18-50 years of age with breast cancer being treated at MSKCC. Validated questionnaires on sexual health and function were administered to patients after they were diagnosed with breast cancer, but before they initiated cancer treatment and at one-year follow-up after initiation of primary breast cancer therapy. Demographic and treatment information was also collected. The female sexual function index (FSFI) total and individual domain scores were calculated. Baseline and 12-month scores were compared using paired t-tests. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess individual variable associations with 12-month FSFI total scores controlling for baseline scores. Results: 127 women were eligible for analysis at the time of this abstract and had a median age of 41. Eighty-nine percent of tumors were estrogen receptor positive and 24.4% were HER-2 overexpressing. Eighty-nine percent of patients received chemotherapy, 61.4% received Tamoxifen and 23% received a LHRH agonist in combination with an aromatase inhibitor. Mean FSFI total score was 20.4 at baseline and 21.2 at 12-months post diagnosis. More than half of women met FSFI criteria for sexual dysfunction (FSFI score Conclusions: Mean FSFI scores in our patients with breast cancer before and after treatment are consistent with scores from other studies looking at cancer patients and are lower than those of healthy women. In the peri-diagnosis period patients had worse sexual function that showed signs of small improvements 12 months after initiation of treatment, especially in the desire domain. Patients are being followed to see if sexual function continues to improve over time, to better understand the factors causing sexual dysfunction in these patients and to determine the best time to intervene in order to improve symptoms. Citation Format: Goldfarb SB, Kamer S, Baser R, Quistorff J, Gemignani ML, Dickler M. Improvement in sexual function over time in premenopausal women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-12.

Background: Abemaciclib is an oral, selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 & 6 that is dosed on a twice daily continuous schedule. In patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), abemaciclib has demonstrated clinical efficacy with a tolerable safety profile when administered as monotherapy in MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), in combination with fulvestrant in MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703), and in combination with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) in MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621). Inducing tumor response and delaying disease progression is of critical need in pts with liver metastases (mets). Methods: An exploratory subgroup analysis was conducted in pts with liver mets at baseline across the MONARCH 1, 2, and 3 studies. All pts had HR+, HER2- ABC. The primary endpoint of MONARCH 1 was objective response rate (ORR), and the primary endpoint of MONARCH 2 and 3 was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Analysis methods for these endpoints were previously described. Key enrollment criteria and dosing information are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Eligibility criteria and dosing information for the MONARCH 1, 2, and 3 studiesKey enrollment criteriaMONARCH 1MONARCH 2MONARCH 3Prior endocrine therapyProgressed on or after ETProgressed while receiving adjuvant or first-line ET, or ≤ 12 months from the end of adjuvant ETET naïve or disease relapse >12 months after (neo)adjuvant ETChemotherapy regimens in advanced setting1 or 200Visceral crisisNo restrictionNot permittedNot permittedDose and Schedule abemaciclib200 mg, twice daily, continuous150 mg1, twice daily, continuous150 mg, twice daily, continuousfulvestrant-500 mg, per label-anastrozole2--1 mg, dailyletrozole2--2.5 mg, daily1post-amendment; 2physician's choice of NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole); ET: endocrine therapy Results: Efficacy results of pts with liver mets are described in Table 2. The most frequent adverse events observed in pts with liver mets in MONARCH 1 were diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue and in the abemaciclib arms of MONARCH 2 and 3 were diarrhea, neutropenia, and nausea. Table 2. PFS and response rates of pts with liver mets in MONARCH 1, 2, and 3 MONARCH 1MONARCH 2 abemaciclib armMONARCH 2 placebo armMONARCH 3 abemaciclib armMONARCH 3 placebo armPts with liver mets, n93115594830PFS, HR (95% CI)N/A.45 (.31, .64).47 (.25, .87)Median PFS, months5.611.63.115.07.2ORR, n (%)20 (21.5)54 (47.0)9 (15.3)26 (54.2)6 (20.0)CBR, n (%)39 (41.9)77 (67.0)21 (35.6)32 (66.7)12 (40.0)CBR: clinical benefit rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] + stable disease ≥6 months); HR: hazard ratio; ORR: objective response rate (CR+PR); PFS: progression-free survival; pts: patients Conclusions: The results suggest that the combination of abemaciclib and endocrine therapy was an effective treatment option in pts with liver metastases, a population deriving modest benefit from single-agent endocrine therapy. Tolerability results were generally consistent with the safety populations previously reported for each study. Citation Format: Di Leo A, Dickler M, Sledge GW, Toi M, Forrester T, Nanda S, Koustenis A, Bourayou N, Johnston S. Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in patients with liver metastases in the MONARCH 1, 2, and 3 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-02.

Advancements in molecular profiling and endocrine therapy (ET) have led to more focused clinical attention on precision medicine. These advances have expanded our understanding of breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis and hold promising implications for the future of therapy. The estrogen receptor-α is a predominant endocrine regulatory protein in the breast and in estrogen-induced BC. Successful targeting of proteins and genes within estrogen receptor (ER) nuclear and nonnuclear pathways remains a clinical goal. Several classes of antiestrogenic agents are available for patients with early, advanced, or metastatic BC, including selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and a selective ER degrader. Clinical development is focused upon characterizing the efficacy and tolerability of inhibitors that target the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/akt murine thymoma viral oncogene (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR) signaling pathway or the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) cell cycle pathway in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative BC who have demonstrated disease recurrence or progression. De novo and acquired resistance remain a major challenge for women with BC receiving antiestrogenic therapy. Therefore, sequential combination of targeted ET is preferred in these patients, and the ever-increasing understanding of resistance mechanisms may better inform the selection of future therapy. This review describes the intricate roles of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and CDK4/6 pathways in intracellular signaling and the use of endocrine and endocrine-based combination therapy in BC.Implications for PracticeThe foundational strategy for treating hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative, advanced breast cancer includes the use of endocrine therapy either alone or in combination with targeted agents. The use of combination therapy aims to downregulate cell-signaling pathways with the intent of minimizing cellular “crosstalk,” which can otherwise result in continued tumorigenesis or progression through redundant pathways. This review provides the clinician with the molecular rationale and clinical evidence for these treatments and refers to evidence-based guidelines to inform the decision-making process.

Background The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay determines the benefit of adding chemotherapy to endocrine therapy for patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The RS risk groups predict the likelihood of distant recurrence and have recently been associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR). This study analyzed clinicopathologic features of patients with low RS and LRR. Methods In our institutional database, we identified 1396 consecutive female patients with lymph node negative, ER+/HER2- invasive breast carcinoma and low RS (

Objective Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to VEGF, has shown efficacy in ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancer in addition to several other solid tumors. Serious side effects include hypertension, proteinuria, bowel perforation, and thrombosis. We tested the hypothesis that genetic variation in hypertension-associated genes is associated with bevacizumab-induced hypertension (BIH). Methods Patients with solid tumors treated with bevacizumab in combination with other therapy were identified from six clinical trials. Haplotype-tagging (ht) SNPs for 10 candidate genes associated with hypertension were identified through the International Hapmap Project. Germline DNA was genotyped for 103 htSNPs using mass spectrometry. Bevacizumab toxicities were identified from clinical trial reports. Haplotypes were reconstructed from diploid genotyping data and frequencies were compared using standard two-sided statistical tests. Results The study included 114 patients with breast, lung, ovarian, or other cancers, of whom 38 developed BIH. WNK1 , KLKB1 , and GRK4 were found to contain single loci associated with BIH. Haplotype analysis of WNK1 , KLKB1 , and GRK4 identified risk haplotypes in each gene associated with grade 3/4 BIH. A composite risk model was created based on these haplotypes. Patients with the highest risk score were the most likely to develop grade 3/4 BIH (OR=6.45; P =0.005; 95%CI, 1.86–22.39). Conclusions We concluded that genetic variation in WNK1 , KLKB1 , and GRK4 may be associated with BIH. These genes are biologically plausible mediators due to their role in blood pressure control, regulating sodium homeostasis and vascular tone. This preliminary risk model performed better than population-based risk models and when further validated may help risk-stratify patients for BIH prior to initiating therapy.

Background Genomic profiling is increasingly incorporated into oncology research and the clinical care of cancer patients. We sought to determine physician perception and use of enterprise-scale clinical sequencing at our center, including whether testing changed management and the reasoning behind this decision-making. Patients and methods All physicians who consented patients to MSK-IMPACT, a next-generation hybridization capture assay, in tumor types where molecular profiling is not routinely performed were asked to complete a questionnaire for each patient. Physician determination of genomic ‘actionability’ was compared to an expertly curated knowledgebase of somatic variants. Reported management decisions were compared to chart review. Results Responses were received from 146 physicians pertaining to 1932 patients diagnosed with 1 of 49 cancer types. Physicians indicated that sequencing altered management in 21% (331/1593) of patients in need of a treatment change. Among those in whom treatment was not altered, physicians indicated the presence of an actionable alteration in 55% (805/1474), however, only 45% (362/805) of these cases had a genomic variant annotated as actionable by expert curators. Further evaluation of these patients revealed that 66% (291/443) had a variant in a gene associated with biologic but not clinical evidence of actionability or a variant of unknown significance in a gene with at least one known actionable alteration. Of the cases annotated as actionable by experts, physicians identified an actionable alteration in 81% (362/445). In total, 13% (245/1932) of patients were enrolled to a genomically matched trial. Conclusion Although physician and expert assessment differed, clinicians demonstrate substantial awareness of the genes associated with potential actionability and report using this knowledge to inform management in one in five patients. Clinical Trial number NCT01775072.

Purpose: The phase II MONARCH 1 study was designed to evaluate the single-agent activity and adverse event (AE) profile of abemaciclib, a selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, in women with refractory hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Experimental Design: MONARCH 1 was a phase II single-arm open-label study. Women with HR+/HER2− MBC who had progressed on or after prior endocrine therapy and had 1 or 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting were eligible. Abemaciclib 200 mg was administered orally on a continuous schedule every 12 hours until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of MONARCH 1 was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Patients (n = 132) had a median of 3 (range, 1–8) lines of prior systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, 90.2% had visceral disease, and 50.8% had ≥3 metastatic sites. At the 12-month final analysis, the primary objective of confirmed objective response rate was 19.7% (95% CI, 13.3–27.5; 15% not excluded); clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD≥6 months) was 42.4%, median progression-free survival was 6.0 months, and median overall survival was 17.7 months. The most common treatment-emergent AEs of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; discontinuations due to AEs were infrequent (7.6%). Conclusions: In this poor-prognosis, heavily pretreated population with refractory HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer, continuous dosing of single-agent abemaciciclib was well tolerated and exhibited promising clinical activity. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5218–24. ©2017 AACR.

The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay predicts the likelihood of distant recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Data on the RS of special histologic subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma with favorable prognosis are limited. We reviewed our institutional database to identify patients with special histologic subtypes of breast cancer associated with favorable prognosis and available RS results. Our cohort consists of fifty-seven women: thirty-three patients with pure mucinous carcinoma (MC), ten with tubular carcinoma (TC), nine with encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC), and five with solid papillary carcinoma (SPC). Most (44/57, 77.2%) carcinomas had low RS (≤17), and none had high RS (≥31). All EPCs had low RS, but other subtypes had RS 18–30. Higher RS was associated with lower progesterone receptor (PR) expression by immunohistochemistry and lower PR mRNA scores (P ≤ 0.007). No morphologic feature (tumor grade, biopsy site changes, cellular stroma, inflammatory cells) was associated with RS ≥ 18. At a median follow-up of 40 months, the distant recurrence-free survival was 100%. One patient with SPC developed locoregional recurrence at 22 months. As the largest series to date, our study raises the question of whether the RS assay is necessary for breast cancers with favorable histology. Reflex testing of node-negative, ER+/HER2− breast cancers may be deferred for these special histologic subtypes, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary discussions between breast pathologists and other members of the breast cancer team.

The aim of this study was to compare fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) for the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with stage IV breast cancer undergoing systemic therapy. Sixty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first- or second-line systemic therapy in prospective clinical trials were included. Response to treatment was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for CE-CT and by PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), respectively. All responders by RECIST (n = 22) were also responders by PERCIST, but 40% (17/43) of non-responders by RECIST were responders by PERCIST. Responses according to RECIST and PERCIST both correlated with PFS, but PERCIST showed a significantly higher predictive accuracy (concordance index for PFS: 0.70 vs. 0.60). One-year PFS for responders vs. non-responders by RECIST was 59% vs. 27%, compared to 63% vs. 0% by PERCIST. Four-year DSS of responders and non-responders by RECIST was 50% and 38%, respectively (p = 0.2, concordance index: 0.55) as compared to 58% vs. 18% for PERCIST (p

Background: The combination of taxanes with trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) for first line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment per physician's choice with anti-HER2 therapy after second line therapy is associated with a median PFS of 3 months. While continued use of H in therapeutic combinations after progression on H-based therapy is common, the efficacy of continuing HP-based treatment after progression on P-based therapy is unknown. Methods: This is a single arm phase II trial of gemcitabine (G) with HP. Eligible patients had HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or FISH ≥ 2.0) MBC with prior HP-based treatment and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies. Patients received G (1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a q 3 week (w) cycle, and H (8 mg/kg load → 6 mg/kg) and P (840 mg load → 420 mg) q3w. The primary endpoint is PFS at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include OS, safety and tolerability. An exploratory endpoint is to compare PFS by RECIST criteria versus 18-F FDG-PET response criteria. Using a Simon optimal 2-stage design, 21 patients were enrolled in stage 1. The successful 3-month PFS rate for stage 1 was set at 57% to allow accrual to stage 2 for a total of 45 patients. The study therapy will be considered successful if at least 27/45 (60%) patients are progression free at 3 months. Results: As of June 9, 2016, 28 patients are enrolled; 21 are evaluable at 3 months and 7 have not had 3-month evaluation. At 3 months, 16/21 (76%) are progression free; 5 patients have progressed. The 3 month-PFS results for evaluable patients will be updated. There are no cardiac or febrile neutropenic events to date. Initially, 5 of 22 (23%) patients required G dose reduction (4 due to grade 3 neutropenia and 1 due to grade 3 vomiting) and the study was amended to lower initial G dose to 1000 mg/m2. Conclusions: The preliminary 3 month-PFS is 76% (95% CI 55% to 89%) in evaluable patients, and updated data will be presented. These findings suggest clinical benefit when P is continued beyond progression. Citation Format: Iyengar NM, Smyth L, Lake D, Gucalp A, Singh JC, Traina TA, DeFusco P, Dickler MN, Fornier MN, Goldfarb S, Jhaveri K, Modi S, Troso-Sandoval T, Argolo D, Jack K, Ulaner G, Jochelson M, Baselga J, Norton L, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Phase II study of gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab for HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer after prior pertuzumab-based therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-34.

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) estimates the likelihood of distant recurrence and the benefit from chemotherapy in patients with early-stage node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast carcinoma. The use of the assay resulted in a substantial reduction in adjuvant chemotherapy usage. In this study, we reviewed the outcome of patients with node-negative, ER+/HER2- breast cancer and low recurrence score treated at our center to further verify the prognostic value of the assay. Design: We identified breast cancer patients treated at our center between 09/2008 and 08/2013 with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and known RS. We reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, RS, treatment and outcome data. The Institutional Review Board approved the study. Results: We identified 1406 consecutive patients with early stage node negative ER+/HER2- breast cancer and low RS [RS 0-10: 510 (36%), RS 11-17: 896 (64%)] in the study period. The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 56 years (range 22-90). Sixty-three (4%) patients were Conclusion: Our results suggest that young age ( Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the 6 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast carcinoma of recurrence score Citation Format: Wen HY, Krystel-¬Whittemore M, Patil S, Pareja F, Bowser ZL, Dickler M, Norton L, Morrow M, Hudis C, Brogi E. Breast carcinoma with 21-gene recurrence score lower than 18: Rate of distant metastases in a large series with clinical follow-up [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-14.

Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is frequently dysregulated in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC), with activating mutations of PIK3CA detected in ~35–45% of patients (pts). Acquired mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes estrogen receptor α, may be associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Taselisib is a potent and selective PI3K inhibitor, with greater selectivity against mutant PI3Kα isoforms than wild-type (WT) via a unique mechanism. In phase I studies, taselisib plus fulvestrant had clinical activity and manageable tolerability in pts with HR-positive BC. We report exploratory analyses of PIK3CA and ESR1 from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Methods: In this phase II, open-label, single-arm study (PMT4979g; NCT01296555), pts were postmenopausal with HER2-negative, HR-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC and progression or non-response to ≥1 prior endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Pts received taselisib (6 mg capsule orally, daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, then Day 1 of each 28-day cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PIK3CA-mutation testing on archival tumor tissue used the cobas® PIK3CA Mutation Test. The Sysmex Inostics' BEAMing Digital PCR platform was used for ctDNA analysis of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations (pre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 1). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in all pts and those with PIK3CA mutations. ORR was confirmed complete response (cCR) and confirmed partial response (cPR). CBR was cCR, cPR, or stable disease for ≥6 months. Secondary endpoints included safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory biomarker analysis. Results: 60 pts were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years (range 31–82). In the metastatic setting, pts had received prior chemotherapy (21.7%) and prior hormonal therapy (50.0%). 86.7% of pts had received prior treatment with an AI. 45 pts had PIK3CA mutation status from archival tumor tissue and ctDNA testing; concordance was 86.7% (39/45). ctDNA analysis, vs archival tumor tissue testing, identified 4 pts and 9 pts with PIK3CA mutations from pts with WT and unknown PIK3CA mutation status, respectively. Based on ctDNA analysis (N=60), 13 pts (21.7%) had mutations in both ESR1 and PIK3CA, 21 pts (35.0%) were 'mutation not detected' (MND) for both genes, 8 (13.3%) had ESR1 mutations and PIK3CA MND, and 18 (30.0%) had ESR1 MND and PIK3CA mutations. In pts with measurable disease at baseline, confirmed responses (all partial) were: PIK3CA mutation, 38.1% (8/21); PIK3CA MND, 8.7% (2/23); all pts, 22.7% (10/44). CBRs were: PIK3CA mutation, 42.9%; PIK3CA MND, 17.4%; all pts, 29.5%. ORR and CBR from ctDNA analyses were similar to archival tumor tissue data. Conclusions: ctDNA analysis identified PIK3CA mutations in pts with previously unknown or WT mutation status from archival tumor tissue; ORR and CBR were similar to those from archival tumor tissue suggesting that PIK3CA mutation testing from ctDNA may be used as a surrogate when tissue is unavailable. 21.7% of pts had mutations in both ESR1 and PIK3CA. Citation Format: Dickler MN, Saura C, Oliveira M, Richards DA, Krop IE, Cervantes A, Stout TJ, Jin H, Savage HM, Wilson TR, Baselga J. Phase II study of taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Analysis by PIK3CA and ESR1 mutation status from circulating tumor DNA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-01.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of a non-hormonal hyaluronic acid (HLA) vaginal gel in improving vulvovaginal estrogen-deprivation symptoms in postmenopausal women with a history of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) cancer. METHODS: For this single-arm, prospective longitudinal trial, we identified disease-free patients with a history of HR+ breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors or HR+ endometrial cancer treated with surgery and postoperative radiation. Participants used HLA daily for the first 2 weeks, and then 3x/week until weeks 12–14; dosage was then increased to 5x/week for non-responders. Vulvovaginal symptoms and pH were assessed at 4 time points (baseline [T1]; 4–6 weeks [T2]; 12–14 weeks [T3]; 22–24 weeks [T4]) with clinical evaluation, the Vaginal Assessment Scale (VAS), Vulvar Assessment Scale (VuAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and Menopausal Symptom Checklist (MSCL). RESULTS: Of 101 patients, mean age was 55 years (range, 31–78), 68% (n=69) were partnered, and 60% (n=61) were sexually active. In linear mixed models, VAS/VuAS scores significantly improved at all assessment points (all p6.5) decreased from 26% at T1 to 19% at T4 (p=.18). CONCLUSIONS: HLA moisturization improved vulvovaginal health/sexual function of cancer survivors. While HLA administration 1–2x/week is recommended for women in natural menopause, a 3–5x/week schedule appears to be more effective for symptom relief in cancer survivors.

ObjectivesThe National Cancer Institute (NCI) National Clinical Trials Network performs phase II and III clinical trials, which increasingly rely on the submission of diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks for biomarker assessment. Simultaneously, advances in precision oncology require that clinical centers maintain diagnostic specimens for ancillary, standard-of-care diagnostics. This has caused tissue blocks to become a limited resource for advancing the NCI clinical trial enterprise and the practice of modern molecular pathology.MethodsThe NCI convened a 1-day workshop of multidisciplined experts to discuss barriers and strategic solutions to facilitate diagnostic block submission for clinical trial science, from the perspective of patient advocates, legal experts, pathologists, and clinical oncologists.ResultsThe expert views and opinions were carefully noted and reported.ConclusionsRecommendations were proposed to reduce institutional barriers and to assist organizations in developing clear policies regarding diagnostic block submission for clinical trials.

Activating mutations in

Fluorine-18-labeled 1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-Fluciclovine) is a leucine analog radiotracer that depicts amino acid transport into cells. 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT visualizes malignancy including prostate cancer, invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC) and invasive lobular breast cancers (ILC). It has not been shown whether changes in 18F-Fluciclovine avidity reflect changes in tumor burden resulting from treatment. This prospective clinical trial evaluates changes in 18F-Fluciclovine-avidity compared to breast cancer therapy response, as determined by residual tumor burden on pathology. Methods: Twenty-four women with a new diagnosis of locally advanced IDC (n = 18) or ILC (n = 6) underwent 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT before and after the completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy. SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion avidity (TLA) were obtained for the primary breast tumor, axillary lymph nodes, and extra-axillary lymph nodes on each exam, and corrected for background 18F-Fluciclovine avidity. The relationship between changes in 18F-Fluciclovine-avidity and percent reduction of tumor on pathology was assessed using Spearman’s Rank correlation. Results: The median decrease in18F-fluciclovine SUVmax corrected of the primary breast lesions was 99% (range 33-100%). The median reduction in tumor on pathology was 92% (range 10-100%). Changes in 18F-Fluciclovine-avidity were strongly correlated with percent reduction of tumor on pathology (Spearman’s rho 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56-0.90, p

BACKGROUND A 21-gene expression assay (Oncotype DX recurrence score [RS]) that uses reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction is used clinically in patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast carcinoma (ER+/HER2- BC) to determine both prognosis with tamoxifen therapy and the usefulness of adding adjuvant chemotherapy. Use of the assay is associated with reductions in overall chemotherapy use. The current study examined the treatments and outcomes in patients with low RS. METHODS The authors reviewed the institutional database to identify patients with lymph node-negative, ER+/HER2- BC who were treated at the study institution between September 2008 and August 2013 and their 21-gene RS results. RESULTS A total of 1406 consecutive patients with lymph node-negative ER+/HER2- BC and a low RS were identified (510 patients had an RS of 0-10 and 896 patients had an RS of 11-17). The median age at the time of diagnosis of BC was 56 years; 63 patients (4%) were aged

Objectives: This is a single-arm prospective longitudinal clinical trial investigating the feasibility of using a non-hormonal hyaluronic acid (HLA) vaginal gel (Hydeal-D) to improve estrogen deprivation vaginal health symptoms in postmenopausal women with a history of hormone receptor-positive cancer. Methods: Preliminary data from an ongoing clinical trial were examined. Demographics, medical information, and clinical assessment from breast cancer patients enrolled on study at baseline (n=23) and at 4-6 weeks (n=18) are presented. Eligible participants included those with a history of breast cancer receiving treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) at the time of enrollment. Furthermore, participants could not have evidence of disease and had to have completed treatment for at least 3 months and no longer than 5 years (excluding AIs). Study participants were instructed to use HLA daily for 2 weeks, then 3 times per week for 12-14 weeks. Study outcomes include: pelvic exam results as recorded on a clinician evaluation form with the Vaginal Assessment Scale (VAS); patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ), Sexual Self-Schema Scale, and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI); PROMIS sexual function items; and exploratory items. Results: The mean age was 56 years (range, 42-75). Seventy-four percent (17/23) were married or living with a partner. Fifty-seven percent (13/23) reported sexual activity with a partner at baseline, which was 72% (13/18) at 4-6 weeks. On the VAS, 65% (15/23) reported symptoms of severe dryness at baseline and 61% (14/23) reported severe dyspareunia; these reported symptoms decreased to 6% (1/18) and 6% (1/18), respectively, at 4-6 weeks. Vaginal pH scores were greater than 6.5 in 30% (7/23) at baseline; by 4-6 weeks, only 22% (4/18) had a pH in this elevated range. At baseline, 78% (18/23) had minimal moisture and 22% (5/23) had no vaginal moisture seen on exam; by 4-6 weeks, 11% (2/18) had normal moisture and 89% (16/18) had minimal moisture. Pain with pelvic exams declined over time—87% (20/23) had pain at baseline, with 22% (5/23) rating it as severe, and 78% (14/18) had pain at 4-6 weeks, with none of the women rating their pain as severe. Forty-eight percent (11/23) indicated confidence about future sexual activity at baseline, which was 56% (10/18) at 4-6 weeks. Level of concern about sexual/vaginal health was measured on a scale of 0-10, with greatest concern rated as a 9 or 10. Sixty-one percent (14/23) of the women fell into this range at baseline; the percentage decreased to 28% (5/18) at 4-6 weeks. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest that an HLA vaginal gel may improve vaginal/sexual health issues and concerns of breast cancer survivors both in their perceived symptoms and on clinical exam; however, further study is needed to examine if these promising trends continue over time and to determine the ideal frequency of product administration. Citation Format: Carter J, Seidel B, Stabile C, Dickler M, Goldfrank D, Baser R, Goldfarb S. Feasibility of a non-hormonal vaginal moisturizer in postmenopausal cancer survivors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-06.

Background: Abemaciclib, a small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, induces G1 cell cycle arrest in Rb-proficient human cancers.1 The clinical safety profile of abemaciclib enables continuous oral dosing to achieve sustained target inhibition, resulting in single-agent antitumor activity against multiple human cancers. The drug also reaches relevant concentrations in the central nervous system and, in patients taking the drug orally, can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.2 For women with previously treated hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), abemaciclib as a single agent achieved a six-month clinical benefit rate of 61.1% and an objective response rate of 33.3%.3 Clinical trials investigating abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant4 or aromatase inhibitors5 have led to randomized Phase 3 studies for women with HR+ breast cancer.6,7 Methods: This Phase 1b study (NCT02057133) with multiple cohorts evaluates safety and tolerability of abemaciclib combined with endocrine or HER2-targeted therapies for MBC. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of abemaciclib when given in combination with other therapies. Cohorts were opened to enrollment sequentially. Patients with HR+ HER2 negative MBC received abemaciclib orally every 12 hours (Q12H) in combination with the following standard therapies daily until progression: letrozole (Part A), anastrozole (Part B), tamoxifen (Part C), exemestane (Part D), or exemestane plus everolimus (Part E). Patients with HER2 positive MBC received abemaciclib orally Q12H in combination with trastuzumab every 21 days until progression (Part F). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0 and tumor response was assessed radiographically using RECIST v1.1. Results: Abemaciclib has been combined with multiple targeted therapies for the treatment of women with MBC. We previously reported safety and early efficacy results for the combinations of abemaciclib with letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus.5 Due to limited follow-up at that time, the efficacy results were not mature. Safety, PK, and efficacy results with approximately 6 months of additional follow-up will be reported across all parts of the study. The most common treatment-emergent AEs include effects on the gastrointestinal and hematopoietic systems. Consistent with previously reported results for both single-agent abemaciclib and the combination of abemaciclib with fulvestrant, tumor responses have been observed among women receiving abemaciclib in combination with targeted therapies for MBC. Conclusions: This study for women with MBC demonstrates the potential for abemaciclib to be combined with therapies targeting specific signaling pathways. References: 1Gelbert et al. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(5):825-37. 2Shapiro et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2500). 3Tolaney et al. SABCS 2014: Abstract 763. 4Patnaik et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 534). 5Tolaney et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 522). 6Llombart et al. SABCS 2014: OT1-1-07 (MONARCH 2, NCT02107703). 7Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr TPS624) (MONARCH 3, NCT02246621). Citation Format: Goetz MP, Beeram M, Beck T, Conlin AK, Dees EC, Dickler MN, Helsten TL, Conkling PR, Edenfield WJ, Richards DA, Turner PK, Cai N, Chan EM, Pant S, Becerra CH, Kalinsky K, Puhalla SL, Rexer BN, Burris HA, Tolaney SM. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, combined with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for women with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-25.