Search

Supplemental Tables and Figures

We conducted next-generation DNA sequencing on 335 biliary tract cancers and characterized the genomic landscape by anatomic site within the biliary tree. In addition to frequent FGFR2 fusions among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), we identified FGFR2 extracellular domain in-frame deletions (EID) in 5 of 178 (2.8%) patients with IHCC, including two patients with FGFR2 p.H167_N173del. Expression of this FGFR2 EID in NIH3T3 cells resulted in constitutive FGFR2 activation, oncogenic transformation, and sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. Three patients with FGFR2 EIDs were treated with Debio 1347, an oral FGFR1/2/3 inhibitor, and all showed partial responses. One patient developed an acquired L618F FGFR2 kinase domain mutation at disease progression and experienced a further partial response for 17 months to an irreversible FGFR2 inhibitor, futibatinib. Together, these findings reveal FGFR2 EIDs as an alternative mechanism of FGFR2 activation in IHCC that predicts sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors in the clinic.Significance:FGFR2 EIDs are transforming genomic alterations that occur predominantly in patients with IHCC. These FGFR2 EIDs are sensitive to FGFR inhibition in vitro, and patients with these alterations benefited from treatment with FGFR inhibitors in the clinic.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2355

We conducted next-generation DNA sequencing on 335 biliary tract cancers and characterized the genomic landscape by anatomic site within the biliary tree. In addition to frequent FGFR2 fusions among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), we identified FGFR2 extracellular domain in-frame deletions (EID) in 5 of 178 (2.8%) patients with IHCC, including two patients with FGFR2 p.H167_N173del. Expression of this FGFR2 EID in NIH3T3 cells resulted in constitutive FGFR2 activation, oncogenic transformation, and sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. Three patients with FGFR2 EIDs were treated with Debio 1347, an oral FGFR1/2/3 inhibitor, and all showed partial responses. One patient developed an acquired L618F FGFR2 kinase domain mutation at disease progression and experienced a further partial response for 17 months to an irreversible FGFR2 inhibitor, futibatinib. Together, these findings reveal FGFR2 EIDs as an alternative mechanism of FGFR2 activation in IHCC that predicts sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors in the clinic.Significance:FGFR2 EIDs are transforming genomic alterations that occur predominantly in patients with IHCC. These FGFR2 EIDs are sensitive to FGFR inhibition in vitro, and patients with these alterations benefited from treatment with FGFR inhibitors in the clinic.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2355

Purpose: Emerging evidence implicates the microbiome in the development of pancreatic cancer. We investigated whether increased levels of microbial-related metabolites in circulation are associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Methods: We applied metabolomics profiling to sera from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cohort to quantify and build a model based on 14 microbial-related metabolites. The study involved samples collected from 172 subjects within five years prior to diagnosis and 863 matched controls. Data from five PLCO centers were used for training and from two centers for validation and model selection. The model was subsequently tested using samples from three independent centers. The contributions of non-microbial-associated metabolites as well as CA19-9 was also assessed. Results: A 3-marker microbial-related metabolite panel yielded in the PLCO testing set an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.53-0.76) for 5-year probability of pancreatic cancer. Five additional non-microbial metabolites were identified that when combined with the microbiome panel yielded an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88) for 5-year probability of pancreatic cancer in the PLCO testing set. The combined metabolite panel and CA19-9 yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) for 2-year probability of pancreatic cancer in the PLCO testing set, which was improved compared to CA19-9 alone (AUC: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82), p< 0.001). Conclusion: We developed a metabolite panel derived in part from the microbiome for risk assessment of pancreatic cancer, which has relevance to prevention and early detection. Citation Format: Johannes F. Fahrmann, Ehsan Irajizad, Ana Kenney, Tiffany Tang, Jody Vykoukal, Ranran Wu, Jennifer B. Dennison, Marta Sans Escofet, James P. Long, Maureen Loftus, John A. Chabot, Michael D. Kluger, Fay Kastrinos, Lauren Brais, Ana Babic, Kunal Jajoo, Linda S. Lee, Thomas E. Clancy, Kimmie Ng, Andrea Bullock, Jeanine M. Genkinger, Anirban Maitra, Kim-Anh Do, Bin Yu, Brian M. Wolpin, Samir Hanash. Contribution of the microbiome to a metabolomic signature predictive of risk for pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P076.

Background & Aims There is substantial interest in liquid biopsy approaches for cancer early detection among subjects at risk, using multi-marker panels. CA19-9 is an established circulating biomarker for pancreatic cancer; however, its relevance for pancreatic cancer early detection or for monitoring subjects at risk has not been established. Methods CA19-9 levels were assessed in blinded sera from 175 subjects collected up to 5 years before diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and from 875 matched controls from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. For comparison of performance, CA19-9 was assayed in blinded independent sets of samples collected at diagnosis from 129 subjects with resectable pancreatic cancer and 275 controls (100 healthy subjects; 50 with chronic pancreatitis; and 125 with noncancerous pancreatic cysts). The complementary value of 2 additional protein markers, TIMP1 and LRG1, was determined. Results In the PLCO cohort, levels of CA19-9 increased exponentially starting at 2 years before diagnosis with sensitivities reaching 60% at 99% specificity within 0 to 6 months before diagnosis for all cases and 50% at 99% specificity for cases diagnosed with early-stage disease. Performance was comparable for distinguishing newly diagnosed cases with resectable pancreatic cancer from healthy controls (64% sensitivity at 99% specificity). Comparison of resectable pancreatic cancer cases to subjects with chronic pancreatitis yielded 46% sensitivity at 99% specificity and for subjects with noncancerous cysts, 30% sensitivity at 99% specificity. For prediagnostic cases below cutoff value for CA19-9, the combination with LRG1 and TIMP1 yielded an increment of 13.2% in sensitivity at 99% specificity (P = .031) in identifying cases diagnosed within 1 year of blood collection. Conclusion CA19-9 can serve as an anchor marker for pancreatic cancer early detection applications.