Search

Introduction: The current study aimed to investigate the rates of anxiety, clinical depression, and suicidality and their changes in health professionals during the COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and methods: The data came from the larger COMET-G study. The study sample includes 12,792 health professionals from 40 countries (62.40% women aged 39.76 ± 11.70; 36.81% men aged 35.91 ± 11.00 and 0.78% non-binary gender aged 35.15 ± 13.03). Distress and clinical depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm, respectively. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses, and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables. Results: Clinical depression was detected in 13.16% with male doctors and ‘non-binary genders’ having the lowest rates (7.89 and 5.88% respectively) and ‘non-binary gender’ nurses and administrative staff had the highest (37.50%); distress was present in 15.19%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics, and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (24.64% vs. 9.62%; p < 0.0001). Suicidal tendencies were at least doubled in terms of RASS scores. Approximately one-third of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop clinical depression was associated with a history of Bipolar disorder (RR = 4.23). Conclusions: The current study reported findings in health care professionals similar in magnitude and quality to those reported earlier in the general population although rates of clinical depression, suicidal tendencies, and adherence to conspiracy theories were much lower. However, the general model of factors interplay seems to be the same and this could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Background: Childhood trauma affects the course of mood disorders. Researchers are now considering childhood trauma as an influential factor in the treatment of mood disorders. However, the role of childhood trauma in the treatment of bipolar disorder remains understudied. Methods: The effect of childhood trauma on treatment outcomes was evaluated among participants randomised to treatment with lithium or quetiapine in the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiatives in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder (Bipolar CHOICE) study by clinician assessment. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to analyse rates of improvement in symptom severity (assessed with the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder) and functional impairment (assessed with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool). Results: A history of any childhood trauma was reported by 52.7% of the sample (N = 476). Although participants with a history of any childhood trauma presented with greater symptom severity and functional impairment at most study visits, participants with and without a history of any childhood trauma showed similar rates of improvement in symptom severity and functional impairment over the 24 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: This is the first study to explore the association between childhood trauma and treatment outcomes during treatment with lithium or quetiapine in the context of a randomised trial. In Bipolar CHOICE, a history of childhood trauma did not inhibit improvement in symptom severity or functional impairment. Nevertheless, these findings need replication across different settings.

Background: Patients with bipolar disorder have higher rates of cardiometabolic comorbidities and mortality. Although guidelines emphasize the importance of cardiovascular monitoring, few studies characterized the cardiometabolic risk profile during treatment and their relation to symptomatology and treatment response. Methods: We analyzed data from two similar 24-weeks comparative effectiveness trials, with a combined sample of 770 participants randomized to two different lithium doses, quetiapine (300 mg/day), or standard treatment without lithium. Glucose, lipids and vital signs were measured before and after 24 weeks of treatment. We calculated several cardiovascular risk scores, assessed baseline correlations and compared the four treatment arms via multiple linear regression models. Results: Higher cholesterol and LDL levels were associated with greater depression severity, showing differential correlations to specific symptoms, particularly agitation, low energy and suicidality. Those randomized to quetiapine showed a significant worsening of cardiometabolic markers during the 24-week trial. Neither baseline nor change in lipid levels correlated with differential treatment response. Limitations: Study duration was short from the perspective of cardiometabolic risk markers, and all treatment arms included patients taking adjunct antipsychotics. The trials compared quetiapine to lithium, but not to other medications known to affect similar risk factors. Conclusions: Treatment with 300 mg/day quetiapine for 24 weeks, representing a short and common dose course, resulted in increased cardiometabolic risk markers, emphasizing the importance of monitoring during mood-stabilizing treatment. The symptom-specific associations are in line with previous studies in unipolar depression, suggesting a cardiometabolic-depression link that needs to be further studied in bipolar depression.

Objective: Patients with bipolar disorder treated with lithium often require additional antipsychotics or anticonvulsants. However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of these agents as add-on to lithium has not been studied. Methods: This secondary analysis combined two similar 24-week trials on outpatients with bipolar disorder randomized to lithium (target serum level 0.4–0.6 mEq/L). Guideline-based adjunctive antipsychotics (Li+AP) and anticonvulsants (Li+AC) could be used if clinically indicated and was assessed at every study visit. Response was measured on the Clinical Global Impression scale and we performed adjusted mixed effects linear regression analyses. Analysis of variance tests compared metabolic measures including a binary diagnosis of metabolic syndrome before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Results: Among 379 outpatients (57% female, mean age 38 years, mean Clinical Global Impression 4.4), users of Li+AP ( N = 50, primarily quetiapine and aripiprazole) improved to a similar degree (mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.6, standard deviation = 1.5) as those using lithium-only (i.e. without adjunctive antipsychotics or anticonvulsants, N = 149, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.7, standard deviation = 1.4) ( p = 0.59). Users of Li+AC ( N = 107, primarily lamotrigine and valproate, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.2, standard deviation = 1.3) and users of Li+AP+AC ( N = 73, mean Clinical Global Impression improvement = 1.1, standard deviation = 1.3) showed worse response compared to lithium-only users (all p Conclusion: Despite treatment-by-indication confounding, these findings are relevant for real-world treatment settings and emphasize the need for randomized trials on this clinically important topic.

Uncertainty remains regarding the relative efficacy of maintenance pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder (BD), and available data require updating. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to consolidate the evidence from the highest quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to July 2021, overcoming the limitations of earlier reviews. The PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for double-blind RCTs involving lithium, mood stabilizing anticonvulsants (MSAs), antipsychotics, antidepressants, and other treatments. Rates of new mood episodes with test vs. reference treatments (placebo or alternative active agent) were compared by random-effects meta-analysis. Polarity index was calculated for each treatment type. Eligible trials involved ≥6 months of maintenance follow up. Of 2,158 identified reports, 22 met study eligibility criteria, and involved 7,773 subjects stabilized for 1-12 weeks and followed-up for 24-104 weeks. Psychotropic monotherapy overall (including lithium, MSAs, and second generation antipsychotics (SGA) was more effective in preventing new BD episodes than placebo (odds ratio, OR=0.42; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.34-0.51, p

Introduction A first manic episode after 50 years of age is uncommon. Late Onset Mania might be indicative of abnormalities in white matter, probably related to vascular, degenerative, or inflammatory processes. Objective To determine if patients with late onset mania have reduced white matter integrity according to Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and structural MRI. Methods Twenty-two patients with late onset mania (>50 years old) and 22 age-paired healthy subjects were included in the study. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was used as a quantitative measure of white matter integrity. Fazekas scale was assessed also to measure white matter abnormalities in the FLAIR sequence. The Frontal Assessment Battery, COGNISTAT and Trail making test A and B were used as cognitive measurements. Results According to DTI, commissural connections (left corpus callosum), and limbic connections (right and left uncinate fasciculus) were different between the patients and the comparison group. Fractional anisotropy values in the left corpus callosum showed significant correlations with neuropsychological measures, and with the Fazekas scale score. According to Fazekas scale, a pathological score in the FLAIR sequence was significantly more frequent in the patients as compared to the comparison group. Conclusions Patients with first episode mania in late life have relevant white matter abnormalities not explained by age, affecting interhemispheric and fronto-limbic networks probably related to executive functioning and emotional processing, at the level of the corpus callosum and the uncinate fasciculus. The etiology of this white matter loss of integrity in patients with late-onset mania is yet to be explored.

Background Study aims were to analyze psychopathological details of prodromes leading to first-lifetime psychotic episodes and apply them to improve prediction of final diagnoses. Methods Comprehensive records of subjects with final diagnoses of bipolar I (BD-I; n = 216), schizoaffective (SzAffD; n = 71), or psychotic major-depressive (MDD; n = 42) disorders in the Harvard-McLean First-Psychotic Episode Project were analyzed to identify psychopathological details of prodromes leading to first-lifetime episodes with psychotic features and their ability to predict final diagnoses tested with multivariable logistic regression modeling. Results While held blind to final diagnoses, we identified 84 distinct psychopathological characteristics of prodromes to first-psychotic episodes, including perceptual disturbances, affective symptoms, sleep disturbances, onset rate, and duration. Prevalence of 19 factors appeared to differ among final diagnoses, and were tested with multivariable regression modeling. Significantly and independently more associated with final diagnoses of MDD than BD-I were 7 features: suicidal ideation, somatic delusions, anorexia, lack of insomnia, older presenting age, depressive symptoms, and lack of impulsivity; 9 others were associated more with later SzAffD than MDD or BD-I: lack of insomnia, homicidal behavior, lack of excitement, visual hallucinations, command hallucinations, longer prodrome, male sex, responding to internal stimuli, and younger age at presentation. Limitations Historical-retrospective and prospective assessments may have misidentified some prodromal features, and subjects with final psychotic-MDD diagnosis were relatively few. Conclusions Psychopathological features identified during prodromes leading to first-episodes with psychotic features predicted and distinguished among final diagnoses of MDD, BD-I, and SzAffD. The findings add to growing impressions that early psychopathology has value in predicting final diagnoses of major affective and schizoaffective disorders.

Objectives Clinical staging is widely used in medicine to map disease progression, inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions; in psychiatry, however, staging remains a hypothetical construct. To facilitate future research in bipolar disorders (BD), a well-defined nomenclature is needed, especially since diagnosis is often imprecise with blurred boundaries, and a full understanding of pathophysiology is lacking. Methods Under the auspices of the International Society of Bipolar Disorders, a Task Force of international experts was convened to review, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature relevant to the development of a consensus staging model and standardize a terminology that could be used to advance future research including staging of BD and related disorders. Results Consensus opinion and areas of uncertainty or difference were identified in regard to terms referring to staging as it may apply to BD, to at-risk status and subthresholdhold stages, and to various clinical stages of BD as it is currently diagnosed. Conclusion The use of a standardized nomenclature about the clinical stages of BD will facilitate communication about research on clinical and pathological components of this heterogeneous group of disorders. The concepts presented are based on current evidence, but the template provided allows for further refinements as etiological advances come to light.

Bipolar disorder often follows a set progression best described in stages where advanced stages are associated with poorer outcomes. Bipolar disorder is also often characterized by a predominance of episode polarity, where some individuals experience more depressive episodes (termed predominant depressive polarity) while others experience more hypo/manic episodes (termed predominant hypo/manic polarity). We examined the associations between staging and predominant polarity with measures of illness burden and treatment outcome utilizing data from a six-month comparative effectiveness trial of lithium and quetiapine in bipolar disorder (Bipolar CHOICE). We used number of self-reported lifetime mood (depressive and hypo/manic) episodes as a proxy for staging and ratio of depressive to manic episodes to define predominant polarity. Polarity and staging were correlated with several measures of burden of illness. Childhood abuse was correlated with more lifetime mood episodes, while more depressive episodes and depressive polarity were correlated with more anxiety disorder comorbidity. Depressive polarity was also correlated with more past trials of psychotropics, particularly antidepressants. However, neither staging nor predominant polarity moderated the randomized treatment effect of lithium vs. quetiapine. Number of depressive episodes in the past year was identified as a potential predictor of overall worse treatment outcome, regardless of medication condition. In conclusion, though staging and predominant episode polarity correlated with several measures of illness burden, they were not associated with differential treatment outcomes. This could be because many of our patients presented for treatment at advanced stages of illness and further highlights the need for early intervention in bipolar disorder.

Individuals with bipolar depression often experience functional impairment that interferes with recovery. These analyses examined the effects of cariprazine on functional outcomes in patients with ...

Fountoulakis K.N., Karakatsoulis G.N., Abraham S., Adorjan K., Ahmed H.U., Alarcón R.D., Arai K., Auwal S.S., Berk M., Bjedov S., Bobes J., Bobes-Bascaran T., Bourgin-Duchesnay J., Bredicean C.A., Bukelskis L., Burkadze A., Abud I.I.C., Castilla-Puentes R., Cetkovich M., Colon-Rivera H., Corral R., Cortez-Vergara C., Crepin P., De Berardis D., Delgado S.Z., De Lucena D., De Sousa A., Stefano R.D., Dodd S., Elek L.P., Elissa A., Erdelyi-Hamza B., Erzin G., Etchevers M.J., Falkai P., Farcas A., Fedotov I., Filatova V., Fountoulakis N.K., Frankova I., Franza F., Frias P., Galako T., Garay C.J., Garcia-Álvarez L., García-Portilla M.P., Gonda X., Gondek T.M., González D.M., Gould H., Grandinetti P., Grau A., Groudeva V., Hagin M., Harada T., Hasan T.M., Hashim N.A., Hilbig J., Hossain S., Iakimova R., Ibrahim M., Iftene F., Ignatenko Y., Irarrazaval M., Ismail Z., Ismayilova J., Jacobs A., Jakovljević M., Jakšić N., Javed A., Kafali H.Y., Karia S., Kazakova O., Khalifa D., Khaustova O., Koh S., Kopishinskaia S., Kosenko K., Koupidis S.A., Kovacs I., Kulig B., Lalljee A., Liewig J., Majid A., Malashonkova E., Malik K., Malik N.I., Mammadzada G., Mandalia B., Marazziti D., Marčinko D., Martinez S., Matiekus E., Mejia G., Memon R.S., Martínez X.E.M., Mickevičiūtė D., Milev R., Mohammed M., Molina-López A., Morozov P., Muhammad N.S., Mustač F., Naor M.S., Nassieb A., Navickas A., Okasha T., Pandova M., Panfil A.-L., Panteleeva L., Papava I., Patsali M.E., Pavlichenko A., Pejuskovic B., Da Costa M.P., Popkov M., Popovic D., Raduan N.J.N., Ramírez F.V., Rancans E., Razali S., Rebok F., Rewekant A., Flores E.N.R., Rivera-Encinas M.T., Saiz P., de Carmona M.S., Martínez D.S., Saw J.A., Saygili G., Schneidereit P., Shah B., Shirasaka T., Silagadze K., Sitanggang S., Skugarevsky O., Spikina A., Mahalingappa S.S., Stoyanova M., Szczegielniak A., Tamasan S.C., Tavormina G., Tavormina M.G.M., Theodorakis P.N., Tohen M., Tsapakis E.M., Tukhvatullina D., Ullah I., Vaidya R., Vega-Dienstmaier J.M., Vrublevska J., Vukovic O., Vysotska O., Widiasih N., Yashikhina A., Prezerakos P.E., Smirnova D.

Depressive episodes, the most frequent episodes in bipolar disorder, contribute in large part to poor functional outcomes. Very few treatments, however, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of bipolar depression. Cariprazine, a broad-spectrum dopamine antagonist/partial agonist with dopamine D3/D2 (preferring D3) and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist properties, was recently approved. A review of the literature suggests that it is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar depression.

IntroductionApproved therapeutics for bipolar depression are associated with a range of undesirable side effects. Lumateperone (LUMA), a mechanistically novel antipsychotic that simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission, is FDA-approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. The efficacy of LUMA in bipolar depression was previously established in two Phase 3 trials, as monotherapy (NCT03249376) and as adjunctive to lithium or valproate (NCT02600507).A recent Phase 3 multi-center trial, Study 401 (NCT02600494) investigated the efficacy and safety of LUMA in bipolar depression and comprised a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period and a 6-month open-label extension (OLE) period. Here, we report the results of the OLE period, examining long-term safety.MethodsPatients, aged 18–75 years, with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder who were experiencing a major depressive episode (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] Total score ≥20 and a Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version, Severity [CGI-BP-S] score ≥4) were eligible for Study 401. Patients who completed the double-blind study were eligible for direct rollover into the OLE or were re-screened if completing the double-blind period prior to the initiation of the OLE. During the OLE, LUMA 42 mg was administered once-daily in the evening for 25 weeks.The primary objective was safety and tolerability of LUMA as measured by incidences of adverse events (AEs) and changes in laboratory parameters, cardiometabolic measurements, electrocardiogram (ECG), and vital signs. The secondary objective was improvement/maintenance of symptoms of depression as measured MADRS and CGI-BP-S Total scores.ResultsA total of 127 patients were enrolled in the OLE, with 74 (58.3%) completing the study. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 73 patients (57.5%) with 54 (42.5%) experiencing a drug-related TEAE. TEAEs that occurred in ≥5% of patients were headache, dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, somnolence, anxiety, and irritability. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Extrapyramidal-symptom-related TEAEs were rare. Most patients who had normal metabolic laboratory values at baseline remained normal during the treatment period. Mean changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, ECG, and body morphology were minimal. Symptoms of depression improved as measured by the mean change from baseline to Day 175 in MADRS Total score (−8.9) and CGI-BP-S Total score (−2.3).ConclusionIn patients with bipolar depression, long-term LUMA treatment was generally well tolerated with low risk of extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, and cardiometabolic effects. These data further support the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of LUMA in patients with bipolar depression.FundingIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.

Objective Treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for bipolar disorder, including bipolar I disorder (BD-I), is common. This review evaluated real-world utilization patterns with oral SGAs in the United States (US) for bipolar disorder (and BD-I specifically when reported) and economic burden associated with these patterns. Methods Structured, systematic searches of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database identified primary research studies (published 2008-2018) describing real-world SGA use in adults with bipolar disorder/BD-I. Results Among 769 studies screened, 39 met inclusion criteria. Most studies (72%) were analyses of commercial or Medicare/Medicaid claims databases. Patient-related (eg, demographic, comorbidities) and disease-related (eg, mania, psychosis) factors were associated with prescribed SGA. Suboptimal utilization patterns (ie, nonadherence, nonpersistence, treatment gaps, medication switching, and discontinuation) were common for patients treated with SGAs. Also common were SGAs prescribed with another psychotropic medication and SGA combination treatment (use of ≥2 SGAs concurrently). Suboptimal adherence and SGA combination treatment were both associated with increased health care resource use (HCRU); suboptimal adherence was associated with higher total direct medical and indirect costs. Limitations Different definitions for populations and concepts limited between-study comparisons. Focusing on SGAs limits contextualizing findings within the broader treatment landscape (eg, lithium, anticonvulsants). Given the nature of claims data, prescribing rationale (eg, acute episodes vs maintenance) and factors influencing observed utilization patterns could not be fully derived. Conclusion Despite increased use of SGAs to treat bipolar disorder over the last decade, reports of suboptimal utilization patterns of SGAs (eg, nonadherence, nonpersistence) were common as was combination treatment. Patterns of SGA use associated with additional HCRU and/or costs were suboptimal adherence and SGA combination treatment; economic consequences associated with other utilization patterns (eg, nonpersistence) were unclear. Strategies to improve SGA treatment continuity, particularly adherence, may improve clinical and economic outcomes among people living with bipolar disorder.

Patients who experience bipolar depression have diverse demographic and clinical characteristics that have the potential to impact treatment. The efficacy of cariprazine in bipolar I depression was evaluated in patient subgroups defined by baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Post hoc analyses of data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in bipolar I depression (NCT01396447, NCT02670538 and NCT02670551) evaluated mean change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores for pooled cariprazine 1.5–3 mg/d versus placebo in subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics. The least-squares mean difference in MADRS total score change from baseline was statistically significant for cariprazine 1.5–3 mg/d versus placebo in all patient subgroups analyzed (P

To evaluate morbidity during long-term follow-up with clinical treatment of affective and schizoaffective disorder subjects followed from hospitalization for first major psychotic episodes.We followed adult subjects systematically at regular intervals from hospitalization for first-lifetime episodes of major affective and schizoaffective disorders with initial psychotic features. We compiled % of days with morbidity types from detailed records and life charts, reviewed earliest antecedent morbidities, compared both with final diagnoses and initial presenting illness types, and evaluated morbidity risk factors with regression modeling.With final diagnoses of bipolar-I (BD-I, n = 216), schizoaffective (SzAffD, 71), and major depressive (MDD, 42) disorders, 329 subjects were followed for 4.47 [CI: 4.20-4.47] years. Initial episodes were mania (41.6%), mixed states (24.3%), depression (19.5%), or apparent nonaffective psychosis (14.6%). Antecedent morbidity presented 12.7 years before first episodes (ages: SzAffD ≤ BD-I MDD). Long-term % of days ill ranked SzAffD (83.0%), MDD (57.8%), BD-I (45.0%). Morbidity differed by diagnosis and first-episode types, and was predicted by first episodes and suggested by antecedent illnesses. Long-term wellness was greater with BD-I diagnosis, first episode not mixed or psychotic nonaffective, rapid onset, and being older at first antecedents, but not follow-up duration.Initially, psychotic BD-I, SzAffD, or MDD subjects followed for 4.47 years from first hospitalization experienced much illness, especially depressive or dysthymic, despite ongoing clinical treatment. Antecedent symptoms arose years before index first episodes; antecedents and first episode types predicted types and amounts of long-term morbidity, which ranked: SzAffD MDDBD-I.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder with subtypes characterized by episodes of mania, hypomania, and/or depression. BD is associated with substantial economic burden, and the bipolar I disorder (BD-I) subtype is associated with high medical costs. This review further evaluated the economic burden of BD and BD-I in the United States (US), describing health-care resource utilization (HCRU) and sources of direct medical and indirect costs. Data were obtained from systematic searches of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Citations were screened to identify primary research studies (published 2008-2018) on the economic burden of BD/BD-I or its treatment in real-world settings. Reported costs were converted to 2018 US dollars. Of identified abstracts (N=4111), 56 studies were included. The estimated total annual national economic burden of BD/BD-I was more than $195 billion, with approximately 25% attributed to direct medical costs. Individuals with BD/BD-I used health-care services more frequently and had higher direct medical costs than matched individuals without the disease. Drivers of higher direct costs included frequent psychiatric interventions, presence of comorbid medical/psychiatric conditions, and both suboptimal medication adherence and clinical management. Indirect costs (eg, unemployment, lost work productivity for patients/caregivers) accounted for 72-80% of the national economic burden of BD/BD-I. Different definitions for study populations and cost categories limited comparisons of economic outcomes. This review builds on existing literature describing the economic burden of BD and confirmed cost drivers of BD/BD-I. Improved clinical management of BD/BD-I and associated comorbidities, together with better medication adherence, may reduce health-care costs and improve patient outcomes.

Background Bipolar disorder is a heritable disorder, and we aimed to assess the impact of family history of mental disorders in first-degree relatives on the severity and course of bipolar disorder. Methods The Bipolar CHOICE (lithium versus quetiapine) and LiTMUS (optimized treatment with versus without lithium) comparative effectiveness studies were similar trials among bipolar disorder outpatients studying four different randomized treatment arms for 24 weeks. Patients self-reported on six severe mental disorders among first-degree relatives. We performed ANOVA and linear regression regarding disease severity measures, sociodemographic and cardiometabolic markers and mixed effects linear regression to evaluate treatment response. Results Among 757 patients, 644 (85.1%) reported at least one first-degree relative with a severe mental disorder (mean=2.8; standard deviation=2.2; range=0-13). Depression (67.1%), alcohol abuse (51.0%) and bipolar disorder (47.0%) were the most frequently reported disorders. Familial psychiatric history correlated with several disease severity measures (hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and earlier onset) and sociodemographic markers (lower education and household income) but not with cardiometabolic markers (e.g. cholesterol or waist circumference) or cardiovascular risk scores, e.g. the Framingham risk score. Patients with familial psychiatric history tended to require more psychopharmacological treatment (p=0.054) but responded similarly (all p>0.1) to all four treatment arms. Conclusions Our findings indicate that familial psychiatric history is common among outpatients with bipolar disorder and correlates with disease severity and sociodemographic measures. Patients with a greater familial psychiatric load required more intense treatment but achieved similar treatment responses compared to patients without familial psychiatric history.

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) studies have examined glutamatergic abnormalities in schizophrenia, mostly in single voxels. Though the critical brain nodes remain unknown, schizophrenia involves networks with broad abnormalities. Hence, glutamine plus glutamate (Glx) and other metabolites were examined with whole-brain 1H-MRS, in early schizophrenia. Three dimensional 1H-MRS was acquired in young schizophrenia subjects (N = 36, 19 antipsychotic-naive and 17 antipsychotic-treated) and healthy controls (HC, N = 29). Glx (as well as N-acetylaspartate, choline, myo-inositol and creatine) group contrasts from all individual voxels that met spectral quality, were analyzed in common brain space, followed by cluster-corrected level alpha-value (CCLAV ≤ 0.05). Schizophrenia subjects had lower Glx in the left superior (STG) and middle temporal gyri (16 voxels, CCLAV = 0.04) and increased creatine in two clusters involving left temporal, parietal and occipital regions (32, and 18 voxels, CCLAV = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Antipsychotic-treated and naive patients (vs HC) had similar Glx reductions (8/16 vs 10/16 voxels respectively, but CCLAV’s > 0.05). However, creatine was higher in antipsychotic-treated vs HC’s in a larger left hemisphere cluster (100 voxels, CCLAV = 0.01). Also in treated patients, choline was increased in left middle frontal gyrus (18 voxels, CCLAV = 0.04). Finally in antipsychotic-naive patients, NAA was reduced in right frontal gyri (19 voxels, CCLAV = 0.05) and myo-inositol was reduced in the left cerebellum (34 voxels, CCLAV = 0.02). We conclude that data-driven spectroscopic brain examination supports that reductions in Glx in the left STG may be critical to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Postmortem and neuromodulation schizophrenia studies focusing on left STG, may provide critical mechanistic and therapeutic advancements, respectively.

Background Lithium and quetiapine can cause weight gain, but their comparative longer term anthropometric effects are unknown, as are the potential moderating effects of baseline binge-eating (BE) behavior. Methods We assessed 6 month changes in body weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference in 482 adults with DSM-IV bipolar disorders who participated in a comparative effectiveness study of lithium and quetiapine with evidence-based adjunctive treatment (Bipolar CHOICE). Anthropometric measurements were obtained at baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks. BE behavior was defined as affirmative responses to MINI items M1 and M3 at baseline. Data were analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures approach, adjusted for baseline values of dependent measures. Results On average, body weight and BMI increased over 6 months with lithium and quetiapine. However, those treated with quetiapine experienced greater increases from baseline in body weight (peak change, + 3.6 lbs. vs. + 1.4 lbs.) and BMI (peak change, + 0.6 kg/m2 vs. + 0.3 kg/m2), starting at 2 weeks (group x time, F8,3052= 2.9, p = 0.003 for body weight, F8,3052= 3.0, p = 0.002 for BMI). Significant increases in waist circumference were observed only with quetiapine. The relationship between drug treatment and changes in body weight (group x time x binge eating status, F1,2770= 2.0, p = 0.002), BMI (F1,2767= 2.0, p = 0.002), and waist circumference (women only, F25,1621= 2.9, p Limitations Bipolar CHOICE was not designed to study anthropometric outcomes. Conclusions Greater changes in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference occurred with quetiapine- versus lithium-based treatment over 6 months of treatment. The effects of study drugs on these anthropometric measures were moderated by BE behavior at baseline.

This exploratory retrospective study assessed demographic and hospital utilization characteristics of patients presenting with methamphetamine use to an urban psychiatric emergency service in New Mexico. De-identified data from patients presenting to PES from 2011 to 2015 were extracted from our health system. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population. We employed bivariate analyses to assess the relationship between methamphetamine use and patient demographics. Methamphetamine use increased faster than any other drug tested during the study’s time period. Compared to non-methamphetamine patients, methamphetamine use was associated with a shorter PES stay when the patient was in the PES more than 12 h. Patients with methamphetamine use are increasingly seeking emergency psychiatric evaluations. Methamphetamine use may impact certain racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic classes disproportionately. Further health service delivery studies are needed to develop clear, evidence-based interventions and policy recommendations to address the methamphetamine crisis in the United States.

The aim of the study was to systematically review the hard evidence alone, concerning lithium efficacy separately for the phases and clinical facets of Bipolar disorder (BD). The PRISMA method was followed to search the MEDLINE for Randomized Controlled trials, Post-hoc analyses and Meta-analyses and review papers up to August 1st 2020, with the combination of the words 'bipolar', 'manic', 'mania', 'manic depression' and 'manic depressive' and 'randomized'. Trials and meta-analyses concerning the use of lithium either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents in adults were identified concerning acute mania (Ν=64), acute bipolar depression (Ν=78), the maintenance treatment (Ν=73) and the treatment of other issues (N = 93). Treatment guidelines were also identified. Lithium is efficacious for the treatment of acute mania including concomitant psychotic symptoms. In acute bipolar depression it is efficacious only in combination with specific agents. For the maintenance phase, it is efficacious as monotherapy mainly in the prevention of manic while its efficacy for the prevention of depressive episodes is unclear. Its combinations increase its therapeutic value. It is equaly efficacious in rapid and non-rapid cycling patients, in concomitant obsessive-compulsive symptoms, alcohol and substance abuse, the neurocognitive deficit, suicidal ideation and fatigue The current systematic review provided support for the usefulness of lithium against a broad spectrum of clinical issues in Bipolar disorder. Its efficacy is comparable to that of more recently developed agents.

Background We aimed to study the probability of bipolar depression response at 24 weeks given initial non-response. Methods We combined two multi-site, 24-week trials including similar populations following the same evidence-based guidelines randomizing patients to lithium or quetiapine. Additional mood-stabilizing treatment was possible if clinically indicated. We report cumulative proportions of response (>50% improvement in MADRS) and remission (MADRS Results We included 592 participants with bipolar depression (mean 39 years, 59% female, mean MADRS 25). Among 393 (66%) participants without response after 2 weeks, 46% responded by 24 weeks; for 291 (49%) without response at 4 weeks, 40% responded and 33% remitted by 24 weeks; for 222 (38%) without a response at 6 weeks, 36% responded and 29% remitted by 24 weeks; for 185 (31%) without a response at 8 weeks, 29% responded and 24% remitted by 24 weeks. Rates were similar for participants who had started an additional mood-stabilizing drug during the first 6 or 8 weeks. Conclusions Among patients with bipolar depression and non-response after 6 weeks treatment, representing an adequate bipolar depression trial, only one-third responded by 24 weeks. These results highlight the need for better treatment alternatives for non-responders to evidence-based treatments for bipolar depression.

Bipolar disorder presents with significant phenotypic heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bipolar disorder, type I (BDI) subjects could be meaningfully classified into homogeneous groups according to activity, sleep, and circadian characteristics using latent profile analysis (LPA). We hypothesized that distinct BDI sub-groups would be identified based primarily on circadian-associated markers.105 individuals with BDI were included in the study. Seventeen activity, sleep, and circadian characteristics were assessed via actigraphy and clinical assessments. LPA was conducted to stratify our sample into homogenous sub-groups. Differences between groups on demographic, clinical, activity, sleep, and circadian characteristics were explored.Two distinct groups were identified, a High Chronobiological Disturbance group (HCD) (56%, N = 59) and a Low Chronobiological Disturbance group (LCD) (41%; N = 46). Circadian variables were the defining characteristics in sub-group determination. Large effect sizes and magnitudes of association were noted in circadian variables between HCD and LCD sub-groups. Several circadian rhythm variables accounted for a large percentage of the variance between HCD and LCD sub-groups. No differences were noted between sub-groups on demographic characteristics and the psychiatric medications currently in use. Mood state did not significantly impact sub-group differences.The protocol was cross-sectional in design. Longitudinal studies are required to determine the stability of the identified sub-groups.LPA was able to identify sub-groups in BDI with circadian variables being the most distinguishing factors in determining sub-group class membership. Future research should explore the role that circadian characteristics can play in defining sub-phenotypes of bipolar disorder.

The primary objectives of this study were to examine referral sources and demographic, clinical, and socioenvironmental characteristics of Hispanics referred to and enrolled in a program of coordinated specialty care (Early CSC program) for first-episode psychosis, to compare them with characteristics of other referred and enrolled racial-ethnic groups, and to identify factors associated with enrollment in the program.A retrospective review was conducted for all individuals referred to and enrolled in the Early CSC program over a 2-year period. Extracted data included referral sources and demographic and clinical characteristics. Zip code-level data from publicly available sources were cross-referenced with individual records. Nonparametric tests and appropriate secondary analysis were used to determine significant differences across racial-ethnic groups referred to (N=180) or enrolled in (N=75) the Early CSC program. A random forest model was used to determine which factors or interacting factors were associated with enrollment among the eligible referrals (N=114).Hispanic individuals were more likely to be referred from inpatient or outpatient mental health providers and not from other community sources. Among eligible Hispanic referrals, those who lived in areas with a lower percentage of Spanish speaking in the home were more likely to enroll in services, compared with those who lived in areas with a higher percentage of Spanish speaking.Continued exploration of factors associated with referral and enrollment in CSC programs for the growing Hispanic ethnic group in the United States can help determine best steps for developing these programs.

Objectives: To clarify the clinical features preceding the onset of bipolar disorder (BD) has become a public health priority for the prevention of high morbidity and mortality. BD remains frequently under‐ or misdiagnosed, and under‐ or mistreated, often for years. Methods: We assessed the predictive value of precursors and prodromes of BD. We assessed precursors of first‐lifetime manic or hypomanic episodes with/without mixed features in retrospective and prospective studies. The task force evaluated and summarized separately assessments of familial risk, premorbid personality traits, retrospective, and prospective studies. Results: Cyclothymic features, a family history of BD, retrospectively reported at‐ tenuated manic symptoms, prospectively identified subthreshold symptoms of hypomania, recurrence of depression, panic anxiety and psychotic features, have been identified as clinical precursors of BD. The prodromal symptoms like [hypo] mania often appears to be long enough to encourage early identification and timely intervention. Conclusions: The predictive value of any risk factor identified remains largely un‐ known. Prospective controlled studies are urgently needed for prevention and ef‐ fective treatment.

Individuals with bipolar depression often experience functional impairment that interferes with recovery. These analyses examined the effects of cariprazine on functional outcomes in patients with bipolar I disorder.Prespecified analyses of data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trial of cariprazine in bipolar I depression (NCT01396447) evaluated mean changes from baseline to week 8 in Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) total score.There were 393 patients with bipolar I disorder (placebo = 132; cariprazine: 1.5 mg/d = 135, 3 mg/d = 126) in the FAST analysis population. Statistically significant differences were noted for cariprazine 1.5 mg/d versus placebo in mean change from baseline in FAST total score (At week 8, statistically significant improvements in FAST outcomes were observed for cariprazine versus placebo in patients with bipolar I depression; more consistent results were noted for 1.5 mg/d than 3 mg/d. In addition to improving bipolar depression symptoms, these results suggest that cariprazine may improve functional outcomes.

Background Incomplete suicidality coding in administrative claims data is a known obstacle for observational studies. With most of the negative outcomes missing from the data, it is challenging to assess the evidence on treatment strategies for the prevention of self-harm in bipolar disorder (BD), including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. There are conflicting data from studies on the drug-dependent risk of self-harm, and there is major uncertainty regarding the preventive effect of monotherapy and drug combinations. Objective The aim of this study was to compare all commonly used BD pharmacotherapies, as well as psychotherapy for the risk of self-harm, in a large population of commercially insured individuals, using self-harm imputation to overcome the known limitations of this outcome being underrecorded within US electronic health care records. Methods The IBM MarketScan administrative claims database was used to compare self-harm risk in patients with BD following 65 drug regimens and drug-free periods. Probable but uncoded self-harm events were imputed via machine learning, with different probability thresholds examined in a sensitivity analysis. Comparators included lithium, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants (MSAs), second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), and five classes of antidepressants. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were built for individual treatment regimens and for any pharmacotherapy with or without psychosocial interventions (“psychotherapy”). Results Among 529,359 patients, 1.66% (n=8813 events) had imputed and/or coded self-harm following the exposure of interest. A higher self-harm risk was observed during adolescence. After multiple testing adjustment (P≤.012), the following six regimens had higher risk of self-harm than lithium: tri/tetracyclic antidepressants + SGA, FGA + MSA, FGA, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + SGA, lithium + MSA, and lithium + SGA (hazard ratios [HRs] 1.44-2.29), and the following nine had lower risk: lamotrigine, valproate, risperidone, aripiprazole, SNRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), “no drug,” bupropion, and bupropion + SSRI (HRs 0.28-0.74). Psychotherapy alone (without medication) had a lower self-harm risk than no treatment (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.52-0.60; P=8.76×10-58). The sensitivity analysis showed that the direction of drug-outcome associations did not change as a function of the self-harm probability threshold. Conclusions Our data support evidence on the effectiveness of antidepressants, MSAs, and psychotherapy for self-harm prevention in BD. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02893371; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02893371

Background: Adjunctive antidepressants are frequently used for bipolar depression but their clinical efficacy has been studied in few trials and little is known about how co-occurring manic symptoms affect treatment response. Methods: Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (N = 482) and Lithium Treatment Moderate-Dose Use Study (N = 281) were similar comparative effectiveness trials on outpatients with bipolar disorder comparing four different randomized treatment arms with adjunctive personalized guideline-based treatment for 24 weeks. Adjunctive antidepressant treatment could be used if clinically indicated and was assessed at every study visit. Adjusted mixed effects linear regression analyses compared users of antidepressants to nonusers overall and in different subcohorts. Results: Of the 763 patients, 282 (37.0%) used antidepressant drugs during the study. Antidepressant users had less improvement compared to nonusers on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder and on measures of depression. This was particularly true among patients with co-occurring manic symptoms. Exclusion of individuals begun on antidepressants late in the study (potentially due to overall worse response) resulted in no differences between users and nonusers. We found no differences in treatment effects on mania scales. Conclusions: In this large cohort of outpatients with bipolar disorder, clinically indicated and guideline-based adjunctive antidepressant treatment was not associated with lower depressive symptoms or higher mania symptoms. The treatment-by-indication confounding due to the nonrandomized design of the trials complicates causal interpretations, but no analyses indicated better treatment effects of adjunctive antidepressants.