Search

Internal snapping hip is a syndrome caused by recurrent subluxation of the iliopsoas tendon. There is little agreement regarding the impinging sites responsible for the jerky motion of the tendon. Thus far, the lesser trochanter, anterior capsule, and iliopectineal eminence are considered the most likely catching sites.We report an unusual case in which a calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris direct head impinged against the overlying iliacus muscle, resulting in a painful coxa saltans. The exclusive involvement of the direct head hid the calcium deposit on standard radiographs, whereas MRI suggested but poorly showed the tendon disease. Dynamic ultrasonography and CT scanning allowed a precise diagnosis and subsequent treatment with CT-guided steroid injection.Calcific tendinitis of the rectus anterior direct head has not been reported as a possible cause of snapping hip; involvement of the direct head in rectus anterior calcific tendinitis was described in one case.Our case shows the rectus anterior direct head may be involved in the etiology of coxa saltans. Theoretically any thickening of the tendon might activate the same pathomechanism. Physicians should consider this possible new cause of internal snapping hip when the most common ones have been excluded, especially as it may be managed easily with steroid injection.

Synovial sarcoma is a rare malignant mesenchymal tumour of soft tissues. It accounts for 8-10% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. The clinical symptoms at onset are often subtle and the course of the disease is slow. Therefore, diagnostic imaging is essential for the early diagnosis of a malignant tumoral lesion. The aim of this study was to assess the role and usefulness of the different imaging procedures in the diagnosis of synovial sarcoma and to present their findings.Between 1985 and 2002, we retrospectively reviewed 35 patients (21 men and 14 women, aged 14-66 years) with synovial sarcoma treated in the Orthopaedic Oncological Surgery Division of our hospital. All patients had previously undergone conventional radiography, B-mode ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.Conventional radiography showed indirect signs of the neoplasm including soft-tissue swelling, calcifications and bone erosions. Ultrasound allowed the detection of focal nodular lesions but was non-specific in distinguishing malignant features. CT after intravenous injection of contrast medium demonstrated inhomogeneous enhancement in 90% of cases, suggesting an alteration in tumour microcirculation. In all cases examined, MRI enabled detection of the intrinsic structural alterations of the mass indicative of an aggressive lesion.Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI provide useful information on the intrinsic structure of the neoplasm, suggesting a presumptive diagnosis. Furthermore, they are necessary for tumour staging, surgical planning and follow-up. The definitive diagnosis is provided by biopsy and histology.