Search

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent disease that has become a public health problem. Progression of CKD is associated with serious complications, including the systemic CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Laboratory, bone and vascular abnormalities define this condition, and all have been independently related to cardiovascular disease and high mortality rates. The “old” cross-talk between kidney and bone (classically known as “renal osteodystrophies”) has been recently expanded to the cardiovascular system, emphasizing the importance of the bone component of CKD-MBD. Moreover, a recently recognized higher susceptibility of patients with CKD to falls and bone fractures led to important paradigm changes in the new CKD-MBD guidelines. Evaluation of bone mineral density and the diagnosis of “osteoporosis” emerges in nephrology as a new possibility “if results will impact clinical decisions”. Obviously, it is still reasonable to perform a bone biopsy if knowledge of the type of renal osteodystrophy will be clinically useful (low versus high turnover-bone disease). However, it is now considered that the inability to perform a bone biopsy may not justify withholding antiresorptive therapies to patients with high risk of fracture. This view adds to the effects of parathyroid hormone in CKD patients and the classical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The availability of new antiosteoporotic treatments bring the opportunity to come back to the basics, and the knowledge of new pathophysiological pathways [OPG/RANKL (LGR4); Wnt-ß-catenin pathway], also affected in CKD, offers great opportunities to further unravel the complex physiopathology of CKD-MBD and to improve outcomes.

Resumen: La osteoporosis (OP) y la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) influyen independientemente en la salud ósea. Numerosos pacientes con ERC presentan una disminución de densidad mineral ósea (DMO), un elevado riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad ósea y un incremento de su morbimortalidad. Con el envejecimiento de la población estos hechos no son dependientes solo de la «osteodistrofia renal» sino también de la OP asociada. Dado que la DMO tiene capacidad predictiva en pacientes con ERC (parte I), ahora analizaremos las implicaciones terapéuticas derivadas. Análisis post hoc de estudios aleatorizados han mostrado que fármacos como alendronato, risedronato, raloxifeno, teriparatida o denosumab tienen una eficacia comparable a la población general en pacientes con una disminución leve-moderada del filtrado glomerular (especialmente ERC-3). Estos estudios tienen limitaciones, pues incluyen mayoritariamente mujeres «sanas», sin diagnóstico conocido de ERC y habitualmente con parámetros normales de laboratorio; sin embargo, también existen datos positivos preliminares en estadios más avanzados (ERC-4) y más limitados en ERC-5D. Por todo ello, al menos en ausencia de alteraciones significativas del metabolismo mineral (i.e., hiperparatiroidismo severo), el beneficio potencial de dichos fármacos debería ser considerado en pacientes que presenten un riesgo de fractura elevado o muy elevado. Es novedad importante que las nuevas guías no condicionan su uso a la práctica de una biopsia ósea previa y que el beneficio/riesgo de estos fármacos podría estar justificado. Sin embargo, debemos considerar que la mayoría de estudios no son consistentes y tienen un bajo grado de evidencia, por lo que la indicación farmacológica (riesgo/beneficio) debe ser individualizada y prudente. Abstract: Osteoporosis (OP) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both independently affect bone health. A significant number of patients with CKD have decreased bone mineral density (BMD), are at high risk of fragility fractures and have an increased morbidity and mortality risk. With an ageing population, these observations are not only dependent on “renal osteodystrophy” but also on the associated OP. As BMD predicts incident fractures in CKD patients (part I), we now aim to analyse the potential therapeutic consequences. Post-hoc analyses of randomised studies have shown that the efficacy of drugs such as alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab is similar to that of the general population in patients with a mild/moderate decline in their glomerular filtration rate (especially CKD-3). These studies have some flaws however, as they included mostly “healthy” women with no known diagnosis of CKD and generally with normal lab test results. Nevertheless, there are also some positive preliminary data in more advanced stages (CKD-4), even though in CKD-5D they are more limited. Therefore, at least in the absence of significant mineral metabolism disorders (i.e. severe hyperparathyroidism), the potential benefit of these drugs should be considered in patients with a high or very high fracture risk. It is an important change that the new guidelines do not make it a requirement to first perform a bone biopsy and that the risk/benefit ratio of these drugs may be justified. However, we must also be aware that most studies are not consistent and the level of evidence is low. Consequently, any pharmacological intervention (risk/benefit) should be prudent and individualised. Palabras clave: Osteoporosis, CKD-MBD, Densidad mineral ósea, Fracturas, ERC, DEXA, Bisfosfonatos, Denosumab, Romosozumab, Keywords: Osteoporosis, CKD-MBD, Bone mineral density, Fractures, CKD, DEXA, Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, Romosozumab

Osteoporosis (OP) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both independently affect bone health. A significant number of patients with CKD have decreased bone mineral density (BMD), are at high risk of fragility fractures and have an increased morbidity and mortality risk. With an aging population, these observations are not only dependent on “renal osteodystrophy” but also on the associated OP. As BMD predicts incident fractures in CKD patients (part I), we now aim to analyze the potential therapeutic consequences. Post hoc analyses of randomized studies have shown that the efficacy of drugs such as alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene, teriparatide and denosumab is similar to that of the general population in patients with a mild/moderate decline in their glomerular filtration rate (especially CKD-3). These studies have some flaws however, as they included mostly “healthy” women with no known diagnosis of CKD and generally with normal lab test results. Nevertheless, there are also some positive preliminary data in more advanced stages (CKD-4), even though in CKD-5D they are more limited. Therefore, at least in the absence of significant mineral metabolism disorders (i.e. severe hyperparathyroidism), the potential benefit of these drugs should be considered in patients with a high or very high fracture risk. It is an important change that the new guidelines do not make it a requirement to first perform a bone biopsy and that the risk/benefit ratio of these drugs may be justified. However, we must also be aware that most studies are not consistent and the level of evidence is low. Consequently, any pharmacological intervention (risk/benefit) should be prudent and individualized. Resumen: La osteoporosis (OP) y la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) influyen independientemente en la salud ósea. Numerosos pacientes con ERC presentan una disminución de densidad mineral ósea (DMO), un elevado riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad ósea y un incremento de su morbimortalidad. Con el envejecimiento de la población estos hechos no son dependientes solo de la «osteodistrofia renal» sino también de la OP asociada. Dado que la DMO tiene capacidad predictiva en pacientes con ERC (parte I), ahora analizaremos las implicaciones terapéuticas derivadas. Análisis post hoc de estudios aleatorizados han mostrado que fármacos como alendronato, risedronato, raloxifeno, teriparatida o denosumab tienen una eficacia comparable a la población general en pacientes con una disminución leve-moderada del filtrado glomerular (especialmente ERC-3). Estos estudios tienen limitaciones, pues incluyen mayoritariamente mujeres «sanas», sin diagnóstico conocido de ERC y habitualmente con parámetros normales de laboratorio; sin embargo, también existen datos positivos preliminares en estadios más avanzados (ERC-4) y más limitados en ERC-5D. Por todo ello, al menos en ausencia de alteraciones significativas del metabolismo mineral (i.e., hiperparatiroidismo severo), el beneficio potencial de dichos fármacos debería ser considerado en pacientes que presenten un riesgo de fractura elevado o muy elevado. Es novedad importante que las nuevas guías no condicionan su uso a la práctica de una biopsia ósea previa y que el beneficio/riesgo de estos fármacos podría estar justificado. Sin embargo, debemos considerar que la mayoría de estudios no son consistentes y tienen un bajo grado de evidencia, por lo que la indicación farmacológica (riesgo/beneficio) debe ser individualizada y prudente. Keywords: Osteoporosis, CKD-MBD, Bone mineral density, Fractures, CKD, DEXA, Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, Romosozumab, Palabras clave: Osteoporosis, CKD-MBD, Densidad mineral ósea, Fracturas, ERC, DEXA, Bisfosfonatos, Denosumab, Romosozumab

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide in which the kidneys lose many abilities, such as the regulation of vitamin D (VD) metabolism. Moreover, people with CKD are at a higher risk of multifactorial VD deficiency, which has been extensively associated with poor outcomes, including bone disease, cardiovascular disease, and higher mortality. Evidence is abundant in terms of the association of negative outcomes with low levels of VD, but recent studies have lowered previous high expectations regarding the beneficial effects of VD supplementation in the general population. Although controversies still exist, the diagnosis and treatment of VD have not been excluded from nephrology guidelines, and much data still supports VD supplementation in CKD patients. In this narrative review, we briefly summarize evolving controversies and useful clinical approaches, underscoring that the adverse effects of VD derivatives must be balanced against the need for effective prevention of progressive and severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Guidelines vary, but there seems to be general agreement that VD deficiency should be avoided in CKD patients, and it is likely that one should not wait until severe SHPT is present before cautiously starting VD derivatives. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the goal should not be the complete normalization of parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. New developments may help us to better define optimal VD and PTH at different CKD stages, but large trials are still needed to confirm that VD and precise control of these and other CKD-MBD biomarkers are unequivocally related to improved hard outcomes in this population.