Search

Licensed vaccines against the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), an emerging pathogen of concern, are lacking. The modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector-based vaccine MVA-MERS-S, expressing the MERS-CoV-spike glycoprotein (MERS-S), is one of 3 candidate vaccines in clinical development and elicits robust humoral and cellular immunity. Here, we identified for the first time a MERS-S–specific CD8+ T-cell epitope in an HLA-A*03:01/HLA-B*35:01-positive vaccinee using a screening assay, intracellular cytokine staining, and in silico epitope prediction. As evidence from MERS-CoV infection suggests a protective role of long-lasting CD8+ T-cell responses, the identification of epitopes will facilitate longitudinal analyses of vaccine-induced T-cell immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein is synthesized as a large precursor protein and must be activated by proteolytic cleavage into S1 and S2. A recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) expressing native, full-length S protein (MVA-SARS-2-S) is currently under investigation as a candidate vaccine in phase I clinical studies. Initial results from immunogenicity monitoring revealed induction of S-specific antibodies binding to S2, but low-level antibody responses to the S1 domain. Follow-up investigations of native S antigen synthesis in MVA-SARS-2-S-infected cells revealed limited levels of S1 protein on the cell surface. In contrast, we found superior S1 cell surface presentation upon infection with a recombinant MVA expressing a stabilized version of SARS-CoV-2 S protein with an inactivated S1/S2 cleavage site and K986P and V987P mutations (MVA-SARS-2-ST). When comparing immunogenicity of MVA vector vaccines, mice vaccinated with MVA-SARS-2-ST mounted substantial levels of broadly reactive anti-S antibodies that effectively neutralized different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Importantly, intramuscular MVA-SARS-2-ST immunization of hamsters and mice resulted in potent immune responses upon challenge infection and protected from disease and severe lung pathology. Our results suggest that MVA-SARS-2-ST represents an improved clinical candidate vaccine and that the presence of plasma membrane-bound S1 is highly beneficial to induce protective antibody levels., Introduction All COVID-19 vaccines licensed to date include the complete SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein as key antigen to elicit protective immune responses. Trimers of this large viral surface protein form [...]

Background: MERS-CoV is a respiratory pathogen with a case-fatality rate of 36%, and for which no vaccines are currently licensed. MVA-MERS-S is a candidate vaccine based on recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA). In this study, the safety, immunogenicity, and optimal dose schedule of MVA-MERS-S was assessed in individuals with previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccines., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 1b clinical trial at two university medical centres in Germany and the Netherlands. Healthy volunteers aged 18-55 years were assigned by computer randomisation to receive three intramuscular injections of 10 7 or 10 8 plaque-forming units (PFU) of MVA-MERS-S, with two treatment groups each of either 28-day or 56-day intervals between the initial two doses, and one control arm that received only placebo, at a ratio of 2:2:2:2:1. The third dose was given after 224 days. The sponsor, clinical and laboratory staff, and participants were masked to both vaccine dose and dosing interval. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the all participants who had received at least one injection; daily solicited vaccine reactions were recorded after each dose for 7 days, unsolicited adverse events for 28 days, and serious adverse events throughout the study. The secondary outcome was humoral immunogenicity, measured with vaccine-induced geometric mean antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates, analysed in all participants who received at least three allocated treatments. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04119440) and is completed., Findings: Between 26 July, 2021, and 3 March, 2022, 244 volunteers were screened, 177 of whom were eligible and 140 were randomly assigned either to the 28-day 10 7 PFU group (n=32), 56-day 10 7 PFU group (n=31), 28-day 10 8 PFU group (n=31), 56-day 10 8 PFU group (n=30), or placebo group (n=16). In total, 178 doses were administered of 10 7 PFU of MVA-MERS-S, 174 of 10 8 PFU, and 164 doses of placebo, and 139 participants received at least one injection. 73 (53%) were female and 66 (48%) were male. No serious vaccine-related adverse events occurred. Solicited local reactions were mild in 288 (93%, 95% CI 90-96) of 309 reports and consisted primarily of pain or tenderness. Pain or tenderness (of any severity) occurred after 69 (39%, 32-46) of 178 10 7 PFU injections, 138 (79%; 73-85) of 174 10 8 PFU injections, and 18 (11%; 7-11) of 164 placebo injections. Of 595 reported solicited systemic reactions, 479 (81%, 77-83) were graded as mild. Systemic reactions of any grade occurred after 77 (43%; 36-51) 10 7 PFU injections, 102 (59%; 51-66) 10 8 PFU injections, and 67 (41%; 34-49) of 164 placebo injections. At 28 days after the second dose, MERS-CoV neutralising antibodies were highest for participants assigned to 56-day 10 8 PFU, with geometric mean ratios of 7·2 (95% CI 3·9-13·3) for the 56-day 10 8 PFU group versus the 28-day 10 8 PFU group (p<0·0001), 3·9 (2·1-7·2) for the 56-day 10 8 PFU group versus the 56-day 10 7 PFU group (p=0·0031), and 5·4 (2·9-10·0) for the 56-day 10 8 PFU group versus the 28-day 10 7 PFU group (p=0·0003)., Interpretation: MVA-MERS-S was safe and immunogenic in individuals with previous and concurrent SARS-CoV-2 exposure. The second vaccination with the 10 8 PFU dose of MVA-MERS-S elicited a stronger humoral immune response when administered 56 days after the first dose than a 28-day interval. Further studies are needed to verify these findings in groups at risk for MERS-CoV exposure, and at risk of severe disease, including older individuals and those with relevant comorbidities., Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the German Centre for Infection Research, and the German Research Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AF became a full-time employee of BioNTech in January, 2024, after completion of this study. CD has been the translational immunology lead at the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) since November, 2022, with responsibilities separate from her role in the present study. BLH is named as an inventor on a patent related to MERS-CoV. SB and GS are named as inventors on a patent for a novel MERS-CoV vaccine. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Licensed vaccines against the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), an emerging pathogen of concern, are lacking. The modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector-based vaccine MVA-MERS-S, expressing the MERS-CoV-spike glycoprotein (MERS-S), is one of 3 candidate vaccines in clinical development and elicits robust humoral and cellular immunity. Here, we identified for the first time a MERS-S-specific CD8+ T-cell epitope in an HLA-A*03:01/HLA-B*35:01-positive vaccinee using a screening assay, intracellular cytokine staining, and in silico epitope prediction. As evidence from MERS-CoV infection suggests a protective role of long-lasting CD8+ T-cell responses, the identification of epitopes will facilitate longitudinal analyses of vaccine-induced T-cell immunity., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. T. W. received consulting fees and honoraria from Gilead Sciences and Merck Sharp Dome. All other authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The RTS,S/AS02A malaria vaccine is based on the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP), which is O-fucosylated on the sporozoite surface. We determined whether RTS,S/AS02A-induced immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies recognize vaccine-like nonfucosylated PfCSP better than native-like fucosylated PfCSP. Similar to previous vaccine trials, RTS,S/AS02A vaccination induced high anti-PfCSP IgG levels associated with malaria protection. IgG recognition of nonfucosylated and fucosylated PfCSP was equivalent, suggesting that PfCSP fucosylation does not affect antibody recognition. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00197041., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)