Search

Context: Azithromycin is recommended as therapy for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, but there has not been sufficient evidence to support the benefit of azithromycin in other patients with CF.Objective: To determine if azithromycin treatment improves lung function and reduces pulmonary exacerbations in pediatric CF patients uninfected with P. aeruginosa.Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted from February 2007 to July 2009 at 40 CF care centers in the United States and Canada. Of the 324 participants screened, 260 were randomized and received study drug. Eligibility criteria included age of 6 to 18 years, a forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV(1)) of at least 50% predicted, and negative respiratory tract cultures for P. aeruginosa for at least 1 year. Randomization was stratified by age of 6 to 12 years vs 13 to 18 years and by CF center.Intervention: The active group (n = 131) received 250 mg (weight 18-35.9 kg) or 500 mg (weight > or = 36 kg) of azithromycin 3 days per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) for 168 days. The placebo group (n = 129) received identically packaged placebo tablets on the same schedule.Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was change in FEV(1). Exploratory outcomes included additional pulmonary function end points, pulmonary exacerbations, changes in weight and height, new use of antibiotics, and hospitalizations. Changes in microbiology and adverse events were monitored.Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 10.7 (3.17) years. The mean (SD) FEV(1) at baseline and 168 days were 2.13 (0.85) L and 2.22 (0.86) L for the azithromycin group and 2.12 (0.85) L and 2.20 (0.88) L for the placebo group. The difference in the change in FEV(1) between the azithromycin and placebo groups was 0.02 L (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.05 to 0.08; P = .61). None of the exploratory pulmonary function end points were statistically significant. Pulmonary exacerbations occurred in 21% of the azithromycin group and 39% of the placebo group. Participants in the azithromycin group had a 50% reduction in exacerbations (95% CI, 31%-79%) and an increase in body weight of 0.58 kg (95% CI, 0.14-1.02) compared with placebo participants. There were no significant differences between groups in height, use of intravenous or inhaled antibiotics, or hospitalizations. Participants in the azithromycin group had no increased risk of adverse events, but had less cough (-23% treatment difference; 95% CI, -33% to -11%) and less productive cough (-11% treatment difference; 95% CI, -19% to -3%) compared with placebo participants.Conclusion: In children and adolescents with CF uninfected with P. aeruginosa, treatment with azithromycin for 24 weeks did not result in improved pulmonary function.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00431964. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: We recently reported a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) that demonstrated a 6.2% improvement in the 168-d relative change in FEV[1] among azithromycin participants compared with placebo participants.Objectives: In the current analyses, heterogeneity of treatment response and the association between FEV[1] and the risk of pulmonary exacerbations were investigated.Methods: The time to first pulmonary exacerbation, hospitalization rates, and antibiotic use were compared between participants categorized by their relative change in FEV[1]% predicted (>/= 5 vs. < 5% improvement) at Day 168. Pulmonary function and exacerbation responses were compared in subgroups of participants characterized by long-term concomitant medications and baseline lung function.Measurements: All available data from the 185 randomized participants in the azithromycin trial were included in these analyses.Main Results: Compared with placebo participants, a reduced risk of pulmonary exacerbations was observed both among azithromycin participants with >/= 5% and those with < 5% relative improvement in FEV[1]. Similarly, decreased hospitalization rates and decreased use of oral quinolone and nonquinolone antibiotics were observed in azithromycin participants regardless of improvement in FEV[1]. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that overall, participants on long-term aerosolized tobramycin and/or rhDNase had worse baseline lung function, but still benefited from azithromycin, as evidenced by a lower risk of exacerbations.Conclusions: Azithromycin participants experienced benefits in exacerbation parameters regardless of FEV[1] response or subgroup. These data have implications for clinical practice and the design of clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Induced sputum has been used to study airway inflammation. We sought to determine whether markers of infection and inflammation in induced sputum were a useful and safe outcome measure in cystic fibrosis. We hypothesized that bacterial density and inflammatory content of induced sputum would decrease after antibiotic therapy. Induced sputum was assayed for bacterial density, cell count, and differential and inflammatory markers before and after treatment with intravenous antibiotics. Fifty-five of the 72 subjects enrolled (mean age +/- SD 18.2 +/- 7.9 years) completed the study. FEV1 increased by an average 0.3 +/- 0.3 L (10.4 +/- 8.7% predicted FEV1), p<0.0001; density of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus decreased by 2.4 +/- 3.1 log10 cfu/g (p<0.0005) and 4.0 +/- 2.3 log10 cfu/ml (p<0.0001), respectively; neutrophil count decreased by 0.4 +/- 0.6 log10 cells/ml (p<0.0001), interleukin-8 concentration by 0.5 +/- 1.3 log10 pg/ml (p<0.05), and neutrophil elastase by 0.4 +/- 0.7 log10 microg/ml (p<0.005). Seven of 127 (6%) sputum induction procedures showed a decrease in FEV1 of 20% or more. We conclude that markers in induced sputum may be useful, noninvasive outcome measures to assess response to therapies in cystic fibrosis studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: To determine the relationship between the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and the patient's response to parenteral antibiotic administration, we performed a retrospective analysis using data from patients in the placebo arm of a phase 3 trial of tobramycin solution for inhalation. All patients were chronically infected with P aeruginosa. Seventy-seven of the 262 patients receiving placebo experienced a pulmonary exacerbation during the trial for which they received therapy with IV tobramycin and ceftazidime. The susceptibility of the P aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime and tobramycin was determined at trial enrollment by broth microdilution.Design: The clinical response to combination antibiotic therapy was assessed by analyzing differences in spirometry before and after antibiotic administration. The FEV(1) percent predicted at the first visit after the conclusion of antibiotic administration was compared to the FEV(1) percent predicted prior to antibiotic therapy. The results were analyzed both descriptively and by regression analyses.Results: The conditions of 54 patients improved, and those of 9 patients worsened, and in 14 patients there was no change in FEV(1) with antibiotic administration. No correlation was observed between the susceptibility of P aeruginosa to tobramycin or ceftazidime and clinical response. Only the three following variables were observed to significantly correlate with FEV(1) after antibiotic treatment on regression analysis: FEV(1) prior to treatment (p < 0.0001); number of days elapsed between the previous FEV(1) measurement and the initiation of IV antibiotic therapy (p < 0.002); and the number of days elapsed between the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration and the initiation of IV therapy (p < 0.03). No significant trends were observed between the antibiotic susceptibility of P aeruginosa isolates and treatment outcomes.Conclusion: While lack of statistical significance for a trend between bacterial susceptibilities and the response to parenteral antibiotic administration does not mean that no such trend exists, the precision of the confidence intervals allows us to conclude that even if isolate antibiotic susceptibilities affect outcome, the impact would be small and not clinically relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]