1. Species selection determines carbon allocation and turnover in Miscanthus crops: Implications for biomass production and C sequestration.
- Author
-
Briones MJI, Massey A, Elias DMO, McCalmont JP, Farrar K, Donnison I, and McNamara NP
- Subjects
- Biomass, Poaceae physiology, Crops, Agricultural, Soil, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide
- Abstract
Growing Miscanthus species and hybrids has received strong scientific and commercial support, with the majority of the carbon (C) modelling predictions having focused on the high-yield, sterile and noninvasive hybrid Miscanthus × giganteus. However, the potential of other species with contrasting phenotypic and physiological traits has been seldom explored. To better understand the mechanisms underlying C allocation dynamics in these bioenergy crops, we pulse-labelled (
13 CO2 ) intact plant-soil systems of Miscanthus × giganteus (GIG), Miscanthus sinensis (SIN) and Miscanthus lutarioriparius (LUT) and regularly analysed soil respiration, leaves, stems, rhizomes, roots and soils for up to 190 days until leaf senescence. A rapid isotopic enrichment of all three species was observed after 4 h, with the amount of13 C fixed into plant biomass being inversely related to their respective standing biomass prior to pulse-labelling (i.e., GIG < SIN < LUT). However, both GIG and LUT allocated more photoassimilates in the aboveground biomass (leaves+stems = 78 % and 74 %, respectively) than SIN, which transferred 30% of fixed13 C in its belowground biomass (rhizomes+roots). Although less fixed13 C was recovered from the soils (<1 %), both rhizospheric and bulk soils were signficantly more enriched under SIN and LUT than under GIG. Importantly, the soils under SIN emitted less CO2 , which suggests it could be the best choice for reaching C neutrality. These results from this unique large-scale study indicate that careful species selection may hold the success for reaching net GHG mitigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: N.P. McNamara, D.M.O. Elias reports financial support was provided by Natural Environment Research Council. K. Farrar, I. Donninson reports financial support was provided by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF