Search

ObjectiveTo assess differences in anal cancer incidence between racial/ethnic groups among a clinical cohort of men with HIV who have sex with men.DesignClinical cohort study.MethodsWe studied men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) under HIV care in CNICS. We compared anal cancer incidence between Black and non-Black men and calculated hazard ratios controlling for demographic characteristics (age, CNICS site, year of ART initiation), HIV disease indicators (nadir CD4+, peak HIV RNA), and co-infection/behavioral factors including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), tobacco smoking and alcohol abuse.ResultsWe studied 7473 MSM with HIV who contributed 41 810 person-years of follow-up after initiating ART between 1996 and 2014 in CNICS. Forty-one individuals had an incident diagnosis of anal cancer under observation. Crude rates of anal cancer were 204 versus 61 per 100 000 person-years among Black versus non-Black MSM. The weighted hazard ratio for anal cancer in Black MSM (adjusting for demographics, HIV disease factors, and co-infection/behavioral factors) was 2.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.17, 4.82) compared to non-Black MSM.ConclusionsIn this large multicenter cohort, Black MSM were at significantly increased risk for anal cancer compared to non-Black MSM. Further detailed studies evaluating factors impacting anal cancer incidence and outcomes in Black men with HIV are necessary. Inclusion of more diverse study cohorts may elucidate modifiable factors associated with increased anal cancer risk experienced by Black MSM.

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), a cause of urethritis, is a growing concern. Yet little is known about the geographic distribution of MG resistance in the United States or about its associated clinical outcomes. We evaluated the frequency of MG among men with urethritis, resistance mutations, and posttreatment symptom persistence.MethodsWe enrolled men presenting with urethritis symptoms to 6 US sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics during June 2017-July 2018; men with urethritis were eligible for follow-up contact and, if they had persistent symptoms or MG, a chart review. Urethral specimens were tested for MG and other bacterial STDs. Mutations in 23S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) loci (macrolide resistance-associated mutations [MRMs]) and in parC and gyrA (quinolone-associated mutations) were detected by targeted amplification/Sanger sequencing.ResultsAmong 914 evaluable participants, 28.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.8-33.6) had MG. Men with MG were more often Black (79.8% vs 66%, respectively),

Background: Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy improves human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) outcomes. However, achieving earlier treatment initiation is challenging for many reasons including provider awareness and clinic barriers; this study sought to understand perceptions of an early initiation program. Methods: We interviewed 10 providers from 3 HIV clinics in North Carolina (October-November 2020). We asked providers about overall perceptions of early initiation and the pilot program. We developed narrative summaries to understand individual contexts and conducted thematic analysis using NVivo. Results: Providers believed earlier initiation would signal an "extra sense of urgency" about the importance of antiretroviral therapy—a message not currently reflected in standard of care. Safety was a consistent concern. Cited implementation barriers included transportation assistance, medication sustainability, and guidance to address increased staff time and appointment availability. Conclusion: Our qualitative findings highlight the need for training on the safety of early initiation and addressing staffing needs to accommodate quicker appointments. Plain Language Summary: Doctor and clinic staff perspectives on a program to immediately start HIV treatment among patients newly diagnosed with HIV Treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is easier than ever. Starting newly diagnosed persons on HIV medication as soon as possible is a now recommended goal. However, starting patients right away can be challenging. This study interviewed doctors and clinic staff to better understand their perspectives prior to implementing a program that would provide newly diagnosed patients with HIV treatment immediately. Results showed that some doctors are worried patients will not return after receiving their medications. Providers want support for linking patients to the clinic and ensuring they will be able to receive their next dose of medication when they come in. Other providers saw the benefits of reducing HIV stigma if the program can more quickly start patients on treatment. Some providers explained that when you go to the doctor and are sick you receive medications immediately, yet for newly diagnosed patients living with HIV, patients can be told to come back a month later to start treatment. Some providers believe shifting this messaging may also help patients take their medications better. Most providers saw the need for clinics to have more same-day appointment availability to meet the needs of the new program. Overall, providers were excited about the opportunity to improve the HIV care by offering HIV medications to newly diagnosed patients immediately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) continues to develop antimicrobial resistance (AR), and treatment options are limited. ARNG surveillance aids in identifying threats and guiding treatment recommendations but has traditionally been limited to sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. Large portions of STI care is delivered outside of STI clinics, such as emergency departments (EDs). These facilities might provide additional venues to expand surveillance and outbreak preparedness.Methods: Through the Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea program, Greensboro, NC, and Indianapolis, IN, identified 4 EDs in high-morbidity areas to expand culture collection. Patient demographics, culture recovery rates, and antimicrobial susceptibility results between EDs and local STI clinics were compared along with lessons learned from reviewing programmatic policies and discussions with key personnel.Results: During the period 2018-2019, non-Hispanic Black patients were the most represented group at all 6 sites (73.6%). Age was also similar across sites (median range, 23-27 years). Greensboro isolated 1039 cultures (STI clinic [women, 141; men, 612; transwomen, 3]; EDs, 283 [women, 164; men, 119]). Indianapolis isolated 1278 cultures (STI clinic, 1265 [women, 125; men, 1139; transwomen, 1]; ED, 13 all male). Reduced azithromycin susceptibility was found at the Indianapolis (n = 86) and Greensboro (n = 25) STI clinics, and one Greensboro ED (n = 8).Implementation successes included identifying an on-site "champion," integrating with electronic medical records, and creating an online training hub. Barriers included cumbersome data collection tools, time constraints, and hesitancy from clinical staff.Conclusions: Partnering with EDs for ARNG surveillance poses both challenges and opportunities. Program success can be improved by engaging a local champion to help lead efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture is necessary to determine antimicrobial resistance, but typically requires specimen collection by clinicians. We sought to determine the sensitivity of patient-collected specimens for N. gonorrhoeae culture. Methods We performed N. gonorrhoeae cultures on paired clinician- and patient-collected specimens from the pharynx (n = 93), rectum (n = 88), endocervix/vagina (n = 89), and urethra/urine (n = 46). We calculated the percent concordance and the kappa statistics for paired-specimen results, and determined the test sensitivity for each specimen type using positivity of either specimen in a pair as a gold standard defining the presence of true infection. Results At least 1 specimen was positive in 26%, 31%, 61%, and 3% of paired samples in the pharynx, rectum, urethra/urine, and endocervix/vagina, respectively. Patient- and clinician-collected results were highly concordant at the pharynx (95%; kappa = 0.85), rectum (99%; kappa = 0.97), urethra/urine (83%; kappa = 0.87), and endocervix/vagina (100%; kappa = 1.0; P  ≤ .005 for all comparisons). Patient-collected pharyngeal and rectal swabs and urine were 92%, 96%, and 96% sensitive, while clinician-collected specimens at these anatomic sites were 87.5%, 100%, and 94% sensitive (P  > .05 for all comparisons). Among 24 urine specimens held for 4–22 hours after collection, 100% yielded concordant N. gonorrhoeae culture results, compared to immediate processing. Conclusions Patient- and clinician-collected specimens are comparably sensitive for N. gonorrhoeae culture. These findings suggest that patient-collected specimens could be used to expand the availability of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance testing for both clinical and surveillance purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]