Search

This document collates into a single document the SPEAC Spontaneous Abortion and Ectopic Pregnancy resources, including the ICD9/10-CM, MedDRA and SNOMED codes , background rates, risk factors, guidance (real time investigation, data collection, analysis and presentation) and tools (data abstraction & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria, algorithm for level of certainty determination, glossary and pictorial level of certainty algorithm).This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of Spontaneous Abortion and Ectopic Pregnancy in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization., The SPEAC project was funded in whole by CEPI.

This deliverable collates into a single document the SPEAC Sensorineural Hearing Loss resources (ICD9/10-CM, MedDRA & SNOMEDCT codes, global background incidence data, risk factors), tools (data abstraction & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria and algorithm for level of certainty determination, pictorial level of certainty algorithm) and guidance (key caveats from the published case definition, real time investigation, data collection, analysis and presentation). This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization.

Pembrolizumab plus axitinib improved efficacy over sunitinib in treatment-naive advanced renal cell carcinoma in the KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) study. However, a relatively high incidence of grade 3/4 aminotransferase elevations was observed.To further characterize treatment-emergent aminotransferase elevations in patients treated with pembrolizumab-axitinib.Patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-426 were included in this study.Three Standardized MedDRA Queries for potential hepatic disorders were used to identify patients for the hepatic event analysis subpopulation (HEAS). Alanine aminotransferase events were characterized for time to onset, time to recovery, corticosteroid use, and rechallenge with study treatment(s).The HEAS comprised 189/429 (44%) pembrolizumab-axitinib patients and 128/425 (30%) sunitinib patients. Grade 3/4 hepatic adverse events were more common in the combination arm: 22% (94/429) versus 7% (29/425); 3% (13/429) discontinued the combination due to hepatic adverse events. In the pembrolizumab-axitinib arm, 125/426 patients (29%) had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥3× upper limit of normal (ULN), with median time to onset of 84 d (range, 7-840 d). Among patients with ALT ≥3× ULN, 120/125 (96%) recovered to3× ULN following study treatment interruption/discontinuation, with a median time to recovery of 15 d (3-176 d): 68/120 (57%) received corticosteroids. One hundred patients were rechallenged with one or both study treatment(s): 45/100 (45%) had ALT ≥3× ULN recurrence, and all 45 recovered to ALT3× ULN following study treatment interruption/discontinuation. No fatal hepatic events occurred.A higher incidence of grade 3/4 aminotransferase elevations occurs with pembrolizumab-axitinib. These events should be carefully evaluated and managed with prompt study treatment interruption or discontinuation, with or without corticosteroid treatment. The decision to rechallenge with one or both drugs should be based on severity of event and thorough causality assessment.Renal cell carcinoma patients receiving pembrolizumab-axitinib are at a higher risk of liver enzyme elevations, which could be reversed with appropriate management.

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are estimated to be the fifth cause of hospital death. Up to 50% are potentially preventable and a significant number are recurrent (reADRs). Clinical decision support systems have been used to prevent reADRs using structured reporting concerning the patient's ADR experience, which in current clinical practice is poorly performed. Identifying ADRs directly from free text in electronic health records (EHRs) could circumvent this. Aim: To develop strategies to identify ADRs from free-text notes in electronic hospital health records. Methods: In stage I, the EHRs of 10 patients were reviewed to establish strategies for identifying ADRs. In stage II, complete EHR histories of 45 patients were reviewed for ADRs and compared to the strategies programmed into a rule-based model. ADRs were classified using MedDRA and included in the study if the Naranjo causality score was ≥1. Seriousness was assessed using the European Medicine Agency's important medical event list. Results: In stage I, two main search strategies were identified: keywords indicating an ADR and specific prepositions followed by medication names. In stage II, the EHRs contained a median of 7.4 (range 0.01-18) years of medical history covering over 35 000 notes. A total of 318 unique ADRs were identified of which 63 were potentially serious and 179 (sensitivity 57%) were identified by the rule. The method falsely identified 377 ADRs (positive predictive value 32%). However, it also identified an additional eight ADRs. Conclusion: Two key strategies were developed to identify ADRs from hospital EHRs using free-text notes. The results appear promising and warrant further study.

This study aimed to characterize adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to hydroxychloroquine in the setting of Covid-19, occurring in Italy in the period March-May 2020. The analysis of the combination therapy with azithromycin or/and lopinavir/ritonavir as well as a comparison with ADRs reported throughout 2019 was performed. ADRs collected by the Italian National Network of Pharmacovigilance were analysed for their incidence, seriousness, outcome, co-administered drugs, MedDRA classification. 306 reports were gathered for the quarter of 2020: 54 % non-serious and 46 % serious, and half of the latter required either the hospitalisation or its prolongation. However most of them were either completely recovered (26 %) or in the process of recovery (45 %), except for 9 fatal cases. Throughout 2019, 38 reports were collected, 53 % non-serious and 47 % serious, but no death had been reported. Diarrhea, prolonged QT interval and hypertransaminasemia were the most frequently ADRs reported in 2020, significantly higher than 2019 and specific for COVID-19 subjects treated with hydroxychloroquine. The logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the likelihood of serious ADR, QT prolongation and diarrhea significantly increased with hydroxychloroquine dosage. Co-administration of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine showed a positive correlation with diarrhea and hypertransaminasemia and a negative relationship with the ADR seriousness. The combination therapy with azithromycin was another independent predictor of a serious ADR. Off-label use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19, alone or in combination regimens, was associated with increased incidence and/or seriousness of specific ADRs in patients with additional risk factors caused by the infection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Diarrhea is an adverse drug reaction (ADR) widely reported with olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). Isolated case reports described this ADR with other ARBs. The present study was performed to investigate if, among the different ARBs, some drugs are more at risk of diarrhea than others. Using VigiBase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database, we performed a disproportionality analysis (case/noncase study). Cases were reports with the MedDRA PT term « diarrhea » and noncases all other reports registered during the same period in Vigibase® from April 6, 1995 to December 31, 2020. After comparison of ARBs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), the main analysis was a comparison of the diarrhea reporting risk between each ARB and the seven other ARBs. Results are reported as reporting odds ratio (ROR) adjusted on age, gender, exposure to antihypertensive, and antidiabetic drugs with their 95% confidence interval. Among the 22,429,334 deduplicated reports registered in VigiBase® during the study period, 73,507 involved ARBs, including 2119 diarrhea. The reporting risk of diarrhea was higher with ARBs than with ACEIs (ROR = 2.06 (1.55-2.17)). Diarrhea with ARBs mainly occurred in females with a mean age of 65 years. After exclusion of olmesartan (to minimize a notoriety bias), two ARBs were significantly associated with diarrhea: eprosartan (ROR = 1.93 (1.32-2.72) and telmisartan (ROR = 1.41 (1.23-1.62) but not the six others. The present study found first that diarrhea is more frequently reported with ARBs than with ACEIs and second that the risk of diarrhea differs according to the different ARBs. Diarrhea with ARBs is not a class effect.

Objective Data harmonization is essential to integrate individual participant data from multiple sites, time periods, and trials for meta-analysis. The process of mapping terms and phrases to an ontology is complicated by typographic errors, abbreviations, truncation, and plurality. We sought to harmonize medical history (MH) and adverse events (AE) term records across 21 randomized clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Methods We developed and applied a semi-automated harmonization pipeline for use with domain-expert annotators to resolve ambiguous term mappings using exact and fuzzy matching. We summarized MH and AE term mapping success, including map quality measures, and imputation of a generalizing term hierarchy as defined by the applied Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) ontology standard. Results Over 99.6% of both MH (N = 37,105) and AE (N = 58,170) records were successfully mapped to MedDRA low-level terms. Automated exact matching accounted for 74.9% of MH and 85.5% of AE mappings. Term recommendations from fuzzy matching in the pipeline facilitated annotator mapping of the remaining 24.9% of MH and 13.8% of AE records. Imputation of the generalized MedDRA term hierarchy was unambiguous in 85.2% of high-level terms, 99.4% of high-level group terms, and 99.5% of system organ class in MH, and 75% of high-level terms, 98.3% of high-level group terms, and 98.4% of system organ class in AE. Conclusion This pipeline dramatically reduced the burden of manual annotation for MH and AE term harmonization and could be adapted to other data integration efforts.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) is an important part of monitoring adverse events (AEs). AIMS: To report an analysis of PMS case safety reports for tofacitinib in patients with UC METHODS: Worldwide tofacitinib PMS reports received in the Pfizer safety database from 30 May 2018 (first regulatory approval) to 25 August 2020 were analysed. The type and estimated reporting rate (RR) of serious AEs of interest, including infection, gastrointestinal, vascular, respiratory, neoplasm and cardiac events, were reviewed. Patient-years of exposure (PY) was estimated based on worldwide sales data and the calculated daily regimens of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, immediate- or extended-release formulations. RESULTS: During the 27-month reporting period, worldwide post-marketing exposure to tofacitinib was 8916 PY. Overall, 4226 case reports were received and included 12 103 AEs, of which 1839 were serious AEs (SAEs). Among the cases reported, 1141 (27.0%) included an SAE and 18 (0.4%) were fatal. The RR (per 100 PY) for SAEs of interest by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class were 3.28 for infections, 1.26 for vascular disorders, 0.74 for respiratory disorders, 0.55 for neoplasms and 0.50 for cardiac disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The types of AEs were consistent with those reported in tofacitinib clinical trials. Most reported AEs were non-serious. Limitations of PMS reports and reliance on estimated RRs due to lack of precise values for exposure, required for incidence rate calculation, should be considered when interpreting these results. ispartof: ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS vol:55 issue:3 pages:302-310 ispartof: location:England status: published

Diverse ethnic genetic populations display variability in the risk regarding anti-seizure medicine (ASM)-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, clinical and epidemiological data on ASM-induced SCARs in Asians is limited.We conducted a retrospective, post-market study until April 30, 2020 using VigiBase® for demographic characteristics, causative ASMs, complications and mortality. The study included adverse events as classified by Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries of SCARs, mainly Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and SJS/TEN overlap reported for ASMs.A total of 694,811 adverse events were reported across the world while using ASMs. Of this, skin and subcutaneous tissue adverse events were 122,885 (17.6%). Among ASM-induced skin and subcutaneous tissue adverse events, SJS, TEN, DRESS and SJS/TEN overlap represented 11,181 (9.1%), 3,645 (3.0%), 5,106 (4.1%) and 6 (0.004%) cases, respectively. Female SJS/TEN/DRESS patients were 54.1%, and 75% of them were adults (18Y). Nearly 64% of the ASM-induced SCARs were serious and culminated in death (3.5%), life-threatening conditions (11.5%), and hospitalization/prolonged hospitalization (43.5%) of patients on ASM therapy. Carbamazepine (31.6%), phenytoin (29.6%), lamotrigine (24.3%), valproic acid (6.4%) and phenobarbital (5.7%) are the most commonly used ASMs linked with SCARs. ASMs associated with significantly higher risk of SCARs in Asians were carbamazepine [n = 3265, ROR 3.55 (95% CI 3.38-3.72, P 0.0001)], lamotrigine [n = 1253, ROR 3.90 (95% CI 3.63-4.18, P 0.0001)], gabapentin [n = 85, ROR 3.58 (95% CI 2.79-4.60, P 0.0001)], pregabalin [n = 68, ROR 3.16 (95% CI 2.40-4.16, P 0.0001)], clonazepam [n = 53, ROR 3.19 (95% CI 2.31-4.41, P 0.0001)], lorazepam [n = 31, ROR 3.07 (95% CI 2.06-4.59, P 0.0001)] and acetazolamide [n = 28, ROR 3.90 (95% CI 2.45-6.21, P 0.0001)].Based on our study, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, clonazepam, lorazepam, and acetazolamide are the most common causative ASMs for SCARs in the Asian population.

Objective In the PALOMA-2 trial, palbociclib in combination with letrozole prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and exhibited an acceptable safety profile in patients with estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). This post hoc analysis of PALOMA-2 evaluated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole in patients with preexisting conditions grouped by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) System Organ Class (SOC). Methods Postmenopausal patients without prior treatment for ABC were randomized 2:1 to receive palbociclib (125 mg/d on a 3 weeks on/1 week off schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d, continuous) or placebo plus letrozole. Patients were grouped by the following MedDRA SOC preexisting conditions: gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, metabolic, and vascular/cardiac. Median PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms within each preexisting condition subgroup. Results At baseline, 276 (41.4 %) patients had preexisting gastrointestinal disorders, 390 (58.6 %) had musculoskeletal disorders, 259 (38.9 %) had metabolic disorders, and 382 (57.4 %) had vascular/cardiac disorders. Baseline characteristics were similar between subgroups and between each arm within subgroups. Regardless of baseline preexisting condition, palbociclib plus letrozole prolonged PFS compared with placebo plus letrozole. Treatment-emergent AEs associated with palbociclib plus letrozole and dose modifications due to AEs were similar across preexisting condition subgroups. Conclusion This post hoc analysis of PALOMA-2 demonstrated a favorable effect of palbociclib on PFS and a safety profile consistent with previous observations, regardless of underlying preexisting condition. Pfizer Inc (NCT01740427)., Highlights • Preexisting conditions can affect the safety and efficacy of breast cancer therapies. • This is a post hoc analysis of patients with preexisting conditions from PALOMA-2. • Palbociclib prolonged median PFS, regardless of preexisting condition. • Within each treatment arm, AEs were similar regardless of preexisting condition.

OBJECTIVES To describe the trend in the frequency of adverse events (AE) records associated to pertussis component vaccines between January 1st, 2015 and June 30th, 2020 in infants younger than 2-years-old in Chile, by reviewing the records submitted to the AEFI NIP, stratified by DTP-vaccine type, wP or aP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective observational study including all AEFI records of DTP (either aP or wP)-containing vaccines in the described sample. A descriptive analysis was performed according to vaccine type and AEFI, using MedDRA terminology. RESULTS The total number of AEFI reports was 1,697: 815 corresponding to wP vaccines, 417 to aP vaccines, and 465 with unknown type. The reporting rates for the years 2015 to 2020 were 40.1, 56.2, 37.1, 24.7, 19.1, and 12.2 per 100,000 doses administered, respectively. The most reported AEFI were injection site erythema (42.9%), pyrexia (35.7%), and pain at the injection site (29.2%). Among all cases, 5.8% were SAEs (n = 98), 5.9% were SAEs for wP vaccines (n = 48) and 5.3% were for aP vaccines (n = 22). DISCUSSION A significant decrease in AEFI reports was observed as of 2018, the year that the DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib was introduced in the NIP.

© 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Objectives: Due to a worldwide increase in drug consumption, oral healthcare professionals are frequently confronted with patients using one or more drugs. A large number of drugs can be accompanied with adverse drug reactions in the orofacial region, amongst others of the tongue. This paper aims to give an overview of drugs that are known to be accompanied with tongue disorders. Materials and methods: The national drug information database for Dutch pharmacists, composed of scientific drug information, guidelines and summaries of product characteristics, was analysed for drug-induced tongue disorders. “MedDRA classification” and “Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes” were used to categorize the disorders. Results: The database comprises of 1645 drugs of which 121 (7.4%) are documented to be accompanied with tongue disorders as an adverse effect. Drug-induced tongue disorders are predominantly observed in the following drug categories: “nervous systems,” “anti-infectives for systemic use” and “alimentary tract and metabolism”. The most common drug-induced tongue disorders are glossitis, tongue oedema, tongue discoloration and burning tongue. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals are frequently confronted with drugs that can cause tongue disorders. The overview of drugs reported in this article supports clinicians in their awareness, diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced tongue disorders.

This deliverable collates into a single document the SPEAC Preterm Birth resources (risk factors, background rates, ICD9/10-CM, MedDRA and SNOMED codes), tools (data abstraction & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria and algorithm for level of certainty determination, pictorial level of certainty algorithm) and guidance (real time investigation, data collection, analysis and presentation). This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess Gestational Age at birth and the occurrence of Preterm Birth in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization., The SPEAC Project is funded in whole by CEPI.

This deliverable replaces an earlier version of the Anaphylaxis Companion Guide (completed Feb 5, 2021) which accompanied the 2007 Anaphylaxis case definition. A new Working Group was formed in 2021 to review and revise the 2007 Anaphylaxis case definition (Anaphylaxis V-1) due to identified issues of the V-1 definition over-calling events with allergic symptoms as anaphylaxis. The new V-2 case definition was completed in September 2022, and this Companion Guide updates the previous one primarily as regards the tools for data abstraction and application to determine level of certainty. No changes were needed for the other sections including risk factors, background rates and ICD9/10-CM & MedDRA codes. This guide should replace the earlier version and can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of anaphylaxis in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization., The SPEAC Project is funded in whole by CEPI.

This deliverable collates into a single document the SPEAC MIS-C/A resources (ICD9/10-CM, MedDRA and SNOMEDCT codes), tools (data abstraction & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria and algorithm for level of certainty determination, pictorial level of certainty algorithm) and guidance (real time investigation, data collection, analysis, and presentation). This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of MIS-C/A in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization., The SPEAC project is funded in whole by CEPI.

This deliverable collates into a single document the SPEAC ARDS resources (ICD9/10 CM, MedDRA and SNOMEDCT-US codes, background incidence, risk factors), tools (Case Report & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria and algorithm for level of certainty determination, pictorial level of certainty algorithm) and guidance (real time investigation, data collection, analysis and presentation). This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of ARDS in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization., The SPEAC Project is funded in whole by CEPI.

This deliverable collates into a single document the SPEAC Thrombosis and Thromboembolism resources (Risk factors, background rates, ICD9/10-CM & MedDRA codes), tools (data abstraction & interpretation form, tabular summary of key case definition criteria and algorithm for level of certainty determination, pictorial level of certainty algorithm) and guidance (real time investigation, data collection, analysis and presentation This guide can be used by stakeholders to assess the occurrence of Thrombosis and Thromboembolism in several settings including as an adverse event following immunization. Note: this guide accompanies the Thrombosis and Thromboembolism case definition specifically. A separate guide will be prepared for Thrombocytopenia Thrombosis Syndrome., The SPEAC project is funded in whole by CEPI.

Introduction In the management of postoperative acute moderate-to-severe pain, opioids remain an important component. However, conventional opioids have a narrow therapeutic index and are associated with dose-limiting opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs) that can result in worse patient outcomes. Oliceridine, a new intravenous µ-opioid receptor agonist, is shown in nonclinical studies to be biased for G protein signaling (achieving analgesia) with limited recruitment of β-arrestin (associated with ORAEs). In two phase 3 randomized controlled studies of patients with moderate-to-severe acute pain following hard or soft tissue surgery, in which analgesia was measured using Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) from baseline over 48 and 24 h (SPID-48 and -24 respectively, oliceridine at demand doses of 0.1, 0.35, or 0.5 mg was highly effective compared to placebo, with a favorable safety profile compared to morphine. This exploratory analysis was conducted to determine whether the safety benefits seen with oliceridine persisted when adjusted for equal levels of analgesia compared to morphine. Methods Presence of at least one treatment-emergent ORAE (based on Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA]-coded events: hypoxemia, nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, or dizziness) was used as the composite safety endpoint. A logistic regression model was utilized to compare oliceridine (pooled regimens) versus morphine, after controlling for analgesia (using SPID-48 or SPID-24 with pre-rescue scores carried forward 6 h). This analysis excluded patients receiving placebo and was repeated for each study and for pooled data. Results At a given level of SPID-48 or SPID-24, patients receiving oliceridine were less likely to experience the composite safety endpoint. Although not statistically significant at the 0.05 level in the soft tissue model, the odds ratio (OR) showed a consistent numerical trend for oliceridine, being approximately half that observed with morphine in both the hard (OR 0.499; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.255, 0.976; p = 0.042) and soft (OR 0.542; 95% CI 0.250, 1.175; p = 0.121) tissue studies. Results from the pooled data were consistent with those observed in the individual studies (OR 0.507; 95% CI 0.304, 0.844; p = 0.009). Conclusion Findings from this exploratory analysis suggest that at comparable levels of analgesia, patients receiving oliceridine were less likely to experience the composite safety endpoint consisting of ORAEs compared to patients treated with morphine. Oliceridine Exhibits Improved Tolerability Compared to Morphine at Equianalgesic Conditions: Exploratory Analysis from Two Phase 3 Randomized Placebo and Active Controlled Trials- A Video (MP4 99188 kb) Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00299-0.

Background and Aims Recent case series and retrospective studies have raised concerns that patients who receive direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at increased risk of developing varicella-zoster virus infection (VZV reactivation). We investigated the relationship between DAA treatment and VZV reactivation by analyzing pooled participant-level data from 37 clinical trials of DAA agents. Methods We obtained demographic, adverse event, and laboratory data from 13,816 participants in 37 clinical trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for approval of DAA agents for treatment of HCV infection. Participants received DAAs (n = 12,249), placebo (n = 997), pegylated interferon (n = 243), or a combination of DAAs and pegylated interferon (n = 327). Occurrence of VZV reactivation was identified using systematically reported adverse event data. HCV virologic response was evaluated by measurement of HCV RNA. Results VZV reactivation occurred in 9.9 cases per 1000 person-years of DAA treatment (95% CI, 6.8–14.0 per 1000 person years) and 13.8 cases per 1000 person-years of placebo (95% CI, 3.5–37.5 per 1000 person years). No participants in the pegylated interferon or combination DAA and pegylated interferon groups experienced VZV reactivation. Within the placebo-controlled trials there was no significant difference in VZV reactivation between DAA treatment and placebo. VZV reactivation was associated with age older than 40 years, female sex, and HIV coinfection. We did not find an association between time of virologic response and time to VZV reactivation. Conclusion In an analysis of data from 37 trials, we found no evidence for an association between DAA treatment for HCV infection and increased risk of VZV reactivation.

Shukui Qin,1 Rui-Hua Xu,2 Lin Shen,3 Jianming Xu,4 Yuxian Bai,5 Lei Yang,6 Yanhong Deng,7 Zhen-dong Chen,8 Haijun Zhong,9 Hongming Pan,10 Weijian Guo,11 Yongqian Shu,12 Ying Yuan,13 Jianfeng Zhou,14 Nong Xu,15 Tianshu Liu,16 Dong Ma,17 Changping Wu,18 Ying Cheng,19 Donghui Chen,20 Wei Li,21 Sanyuan Sun,22 Zhuang Yu,23 Peiguo Cao,24 Haihui Chen,25 Jiejun Wang,26 Shubin Wang,27 Hongbing Wang,28 Ning Wang,29 Bin Zhang,29 Qiang Zhang,29 Weiguo Su,30 Xiaojun Guo,30 Jin Li31 1Cancer Center, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Medical Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, People’s Republic of China; 6Department of Medical Oncology, Nantong Cancer Hospital, Nantong, People’s Republic of China; 7Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 8Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China; 9Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 10Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 11Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 12Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 13Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 14Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 15Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 16Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 17Department of Medical Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 18Department of Medical Oncology, The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, People’s Republic of China; 19Department of Medical Oncology, Jilin Province Cancer Hospital, Changchun, People’s Republic of China; 20Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated First People’s Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 21Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China; 22Department of Medical Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China; 23Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; 24Department of Medical Oncology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China; 25Department of Medical Oncology, Liuzhou Worker’s Hospital, Liuzhou, People’s Republic of China; 26Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 27Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Beijing University, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China; 28Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China; 29Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 30Hutchison MediPharma Limited, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 31Department of Medical Oncology, Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jin LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tongji University Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +8613761222111Email lijin@csco.org.cnObjective: The aim of the present subgroup analysis of the FRESCO trial is to determine the efficacy and hepatotoxicity of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with metastatic CRC with liver metastasis (CRLM) who were receiving third-line or posterior-line therapy.Methods: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated through Cox proportional hazards model. Hepatotoxicity was coded using the standardized MedDRA queries of hepatic failure, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and other liver injury-related conditions and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events grades. The efficacy of fruquintinib in patients with CRLM was evaluated in various subgroups.Results: A total of 287 (69.0%) patients with metastatic CRC had liver metastasis (LM, fruquintinib: 185 and placebo: 102). Median OS in patients with CRLM was significantly prolonged with fruquintinib compared with placebo (8.61 months vs 5.98 months; HR=0.59, 95% CI, 0.45– 0.77, P< 0.001). In patients with CRLM, the incremental median PFS for patients in the fruquintinib-treated group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (median PFS: 3.71 vs.1.84 months; HR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.17– 0.30; P< 0.001). Compared with placebo, significant improvements in OS were observed with fruquintinib in LM patients regardless of lung metastasis, prior target therapy, and K-RAS status. In patients with CRLM, treatment-emergent hepatotoxicities of any grade occurred in 7 (3.8%) patients in the fruquintinib group vs 2 (2.0%) in the placebo group.Conclusion: Fruquintinib demonstrated a statistically significant increase in OS and PFS as compared with placebo in Chinese patients with CRLM. The hepatotoxicity of fruquintinib was less reported, and comparable with placebo in patients with CRLM.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02314819.Keywords: colorectal cancer, FRESCO trial, fruquintinib, liver metastasis

Purpose Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). Methods All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. Results In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. Conclusion The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments.

Background:. Taxanes are an essential class of antineoplastic agents used to treat various cancers and are a fundamental cause of hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, other adverse events, such as bone marrow toxicity and peripheral neuropathy, can lead to chemotherapy discontinuation. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of taxanes in the real world. Methods:. Taxane-associated adverse events were identified by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Preferred Terms and analyzed and compared by mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pharmacovigilance database from January 2004 to December 2019. Reported adverse events, such as hypersensitivity reaction, bone marrow toxicity, and peripheral neuropathy, were analyzed with the following signal detection algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and logistic regression methods. Adverse outcome events and death outcome rates were compared between different taxane groups using Pearson's χ2 test, whereas significance was determined at P < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results:. A total of 966 reports of hypersensitivity reactions, 1109 reports of bone marrow toxicity, and 1374 reports of peripheral neuropathy were analyzed. Compared with paclitaxel and docetaxel, bone marrow toxicity following the use of nab-paclitaxel had the highest ROR of 6.45 (95% two-sided CI, 6.05–6.88), PRR of 5.66, (χ2 = 4342.98), information component of 2.50 (95% one-sided CI = 2.34), and empirical Bayes geometric mean of 5.64 (95% one-sided CI = 5.34). Peripheral neuropathy following the use of nab-paclitaxel showed a higher ROR of 12.78 (95% two-sided CI, 11.55–14.14), PRR of 12.16 (χ2 = 4060.88), information component of 3.59 (95% one-sided CI = 3.25), and empirical Bayes geometric mean of 12.07 (95% one-sided CI = 11.09). Conclusions:. The results showed that bone marrow toxicity and peripheral neuropathy were the major adverse events induced by taxanes. Nab-paclitaxel exhibited the highest potential for taxane-associated adverse events. Further research in the future is warranted to explain taxane-associated adverse effects in real-world circumstances.

A scoping review assessing the prevalence of adverse event terminologies may facilitate the choice of the terminology programs by trialists, researchers, and clinicians in the absence of legal mandates for reporting about harms from research studies. No scoping review to date has assessed the types and prevalence of medical terminologies in use for RCTs, observational studies, and other sources describing drug interventions. Our results will add to the literature a description of utilized adverse event terminologies to provide researchers and trialists a summary of adverse event terminology sources and diseases described by them to inform journal editors and funding bodies to the multiple choices of adverse event terminologies, which can present a bias.

International audience; Aims: The major cardiovascular (CV) adverse effects observed with sipuleucel-T from large multi-institutional clinical trials included thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure in up to 0.3% of patients with CV risk factors. The incidence, outcomes, and mechanisms in real-world clinical settings of these CV adverse effects to date have not been fully elucidated. Our study identified a patient with sipuleucel-T-induced inflammatory cardiomyopathy, which led to the identification of CV adverse effects associated with sipuleucel-T from a large pharmacovigilance database and elucidation of its potential mechanisms.Methods and results: Using the MedDRA term 'cardiac disorders' (System Organ Class level), CV adverse events associated with sipuleucel-T versus all other drugs were reviewed from VigiBase, a large pharmacovigilance database. Disproportionality analysis was calculated by the information component (IC), a Bayesian disproportionality indicator. A positive IC025 (IC 95% lower end credibility interval) value (>0) is the traditional threshold used in statistical signal detection at the Uppsala Monitoring Centre. From VigiBase, the total number of CV adverse drug reaction reported with sipuleucel-T was 306 out of a total of 22 980 104 adverse drug reactions in VigiBase on 10/25/2020. MedDRA preferred terms levels were grouped into major CV adverse drug reaction categories where we observed significant reports of myocardial ischaemia, supraventricular tachycardia (particularly atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter), congestive heart failure, and valvular disorders. Myocardial ischemia included acute myocardial infarction (IC025 2.3) with n = 4/26 (15%) of these individual case safety reports considered fatal. Among patients with 'cardiac failure congestive' (IC025 1.5), 11 of these 43 cases (26%) were fatal with 42 (98%) of these cases considered to be solely due to sipuleucel-T.Conclusions: Patients with CV risk factors who are receiving sipuleucel-T may be at higher risk for congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia, and supraventricular tachycardia. Electrocardiograms during weekly sipuleucel-T infusions and left ventricular function monitoring with echocardiogram should be considered in these patients. Our findings are suggestive of another rare presentation of T-cell-mediated CV toxicity with cancer immunotherapy.

Objective In 2018, the Pharmacological Risk Assessment Committee alerted to a potential relationship between accumulated hydrochlorothiazide dosage and the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. To study this relationship we used data from the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System for Medicinal Products of Human Use. Materials and methods Following a case search for every thiazide potentially associated with (SMQ/MedDRA) "Malignant Skin Neoplasms and not Otherwise Specified Skin Neoplasms", a series of disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Registered adverse drug reactions and disproportionality through the reported odds ratio were the main outcome measures. Results For basal cell carcinoma, reporting odds ratio was 4.8 (2.2 - 10.7); squamous cell carcinoma 3.2 (0.9 - 10.5); malignant melanoma, 0.8 (0.2 - 3.5). We found both disproportionality and association between hydrochlorothiazide and basal cell carcinoma, but none of these were found regarding malignant skin melanoma. In the case of squamous cell carcinoma, the lower confidence interval limit was below 1, thus the disproportionality value was not statistically significant. The accumulated hydrochlorothiazide dose was 36,714 mg for basal cell carcinoma; 98,288 mg for squamous cell carcinoma; and 38,444 mg for malignant melanoma. Conclusion The results in Spain, where sun exposure is significant, are consistent with the data in the Pharmacological Risk Assessment Committee's alert, which were obtained in Denmark for both basal cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma. However, the results for squamous cell carcinoma did not reach statistical significance, although the reporting odds ratio value suggested a potential relationship between hydrochlorothiazide and squamous cell carcinoma.

AIM Dimethyl fumarate and nicotinic acid activate the hydroxy-carboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCA2 ) and induce flushing. It is not known whether HCA2 mediates other adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to these two substances. This study aims to compare ADRs associated with dimethyl fumarate and nicotinic acid, and to discuss whether they are HCA2 -mediated. METHODS We identified spontaneous reports of suspected ADRs to dimethyl fumarate and nicotinic acid in the European Adverse Drug Reaction Database (EudraVigilance). These reports were analysed at different hierarchical levels of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In addition, we screened murine organs for HCA2 expression. RESULTS Similarities in the ADR profile of dimethyl fumarate and nicotinic acid included "gastrointestinal signs and symptoms" (odds ratio [OR] 0.8 [0.6-1.1]), "hepatobiliary investigations" (OR 1.3 [0.7-2.5]) and "anxiety disorders and symptoms" (OR 0.9 [0.3-2.2]) in High Level Group Terms; "diarrhoea (excluding infective)" (OR 1.2 [0.7-1.8]) and "liver function analyses" (OR 1.3 [0.7-2.6]) in High Level Terms; and "diarrhoea" (OR 1.2 [0.7-2.0]) and "vomiting" (OR 0.9 [0.4-1.7]) in Preferred Terms. In analogy, HCA2 was expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and central nervous system (CNS) of murine organs. A discrepant ADR profile was seen for "lymphopenia" (n = 777) at the preferred term level (only reported for dimethyl fumarate) and "blood glucose increased" (more often reported for nicotinic acid; OR 0.1 [0.0-0.5]). CONCLUSION The gastrointestinal ADRs common to both substances may be mediated by HCA2 . Other ADRs not common to both substances are compound or indication-specific reactions and likely do not involve HCA2 .